Subscriber access provided by CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY
Article
Occupational Exposure to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon of Wildland Firefighters at Prescribed and Wildland Fires Kathleen Navarro, Ricardo Cisneros, Elizabeth Noth, John R. Balmes, and S. Katharine Hammond Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • Publication Date (Web): 12 May 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 13, 2017
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 25
Environmental Science & Technology
1
Occupational Exposure to Polycyclic Aromatic
2
Hydrocarbon of Wildland Firefighters at Prescribed
3
and Wildland Fires
4
5
Kathleen M. Navarro1,*, Ricardo Cisneros2, Elizabeth M. Noth1, John R. Balmes1, S. Katharine
6
Hammond1
7 8
1. Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California,
9
Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
10
2. School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts, University of California, Merced, Merced,
11
CA
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Corresponding Author: Kathleen Navarro School of Social Sciences, Humanities & Arts 5200 N. Lake Road SSM 361A Merced, CA 95343 E-mail:
[email protected] Phone: 408-644-0186
TOC Abstract Art
1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64
Abstract
2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 25
Page 3 of 25
Environmental Science & Technology
65
Wildland firefighters suppressing wildland fires or conducting prescribed fires work long shifts
66
during which they are exposed to high levels of wood smoke with no respiratory protection.
67
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are hazardous air pollutants formed during incomplete
68
combustion. Exposure to PAHs was measured for 21 wildland firefighters suppressing two
69
wildland fires and 4 wildland firefighters conducting prescribed burns in California. Personal air
70
samples were actively collected using XAD4-coated quartz fiber filters and XAD2 sorbent tubes.
71
Samples were analyzed for 17 individual PAHs through extraction with dichloromethane and gas
72
chromatograph-mass spectrometer analysis. Naphthalene, retene, and phenanthrene were
73
consistently the highest measured PAHs. PAH concentrations were higher at wildland fires
74
compared to prescribed fires and were highest for firefighters during job tasks that involve the
75
most direct contact with smoke near an actively burning wildland fire. Although concentrations
76
did not exceed current occupational exposure limits, wildland firefighters are exposed to PAHs
77
not only on the fire line at wildland fires, but also while working prescribed burns and while off-
78
duty. Characterization of occupational exposures from wildland firefighting is important to
79
understand better any potential long-term health effects.
80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94
Introduction
3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
95
Over the past 10 years approximately 63 million hectares in the United States have been burned
96
by wildland fires. In 2015 27,000 wildland firefighters employed by the federal government
97
worked to suppress wildland fires over 4 million hectares, the highest amount of forested land
98
burned in the last decade.1,2 Prescribed fires are intentionally ignited, low-intensity fires used for
99
land management and ecological benefit and can reduce risks of future wildland fires.3 Annually
100
in the United States, roughly 900,000 hectares are treated with prescribed fire.1 Wildland
101
firefighters suppressing wildland fires or conducting prescribed burns often work long hours, are
102
exposed to high levels of wood smoke. 4,5
103 104
Wildland fires emit large amounts of air pollutants known to cause adverse health effects.
105
Previous studies of wildland firefighters have shown that wood smoke exposure is associated
106
with increases in airway responsiveness, decreases in lung function, and a significant cross-shift
107
difference in circulating cytokine levels.5,6 Gaughan et al. reported that some wildland
108
firefighters had acute lung function decline after exposure to fine smoke particles.7 Past exposure
109
assessments of wildland fires have measured levels of fine and respirable particulate matter
110
(PM2.5, PM4), acrolein, benzene, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, formaldehyde, crystalline
111
silica, total particulates, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).4,8 Currently in the United
112
States, wildland firefighters do not wear respiratory protection, as is not currently practical given
113
the physically demanding nature of wildland firefighting.4,5 De Vos et al. 2009, evaluated the
114
use of the negative pressure half face air purifying respirators with organic vapor and
115
formaldehyde filters and reported that they were effective in reducing exposures and provided
116
protection for firefighter’s airway. However, these firefighters only wore respiratory protection
4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 25
Page 5 of 25
Environmental Science & Technology
117
for 2 hours, not representative of a full shift (12-16 hours), did not perform any firefighting tasks,
118
and were not protected against carbon monoxide exposure.9
119 120
PAHs are a class of compounds consisting of two or more fused benzene rings.10 They are
121
hazardous air pollutants formed during incomplete combustion and are known mutagens and
122
carcinogens. The International Agency for Research on Cancer has listed benzo[a]pyrene as a
123
human carcinogen, benz[a]anthracene and dibenzo[a,h]anthracene as probable human
124
carcinogens and benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[j]fluoranthene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, chrysene,
125
and naphthalene as possible human carcinogens.11–13 Exposure to PAHs has also been associated
126
with cardiopulmonary mortality and decreased immune function.14,15 Past occupational health
127
studies found that exposure to PAHs was associated with a higher risk of lung and bladder cancer
128
and skin cancer from dermal exposure to PAHs.16,17
129 130
Lower molecular weight PAHs exist in the environment in the gas phase or partitioned between
131
the gas and particle phases, while higher molecular weight PAHs exist in the particle phase.8 Past
132
studies have demonstrated that open-air burning of wood generates more gas-phase than particle-
133
phase PAHs.18–20 Only a few studies have characterized personal exposures to PAHs during
134
wildland fires. Materna et al. measured PAH concentrations in northern California during three
135
wildfire seasons (1986-1989) and reported highest mean concentrations for pyrene, phenanthrene
136
and fluoranthene. A National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Health
137
Hazard Evaluation Report completed in 1994, detected acenaphthene, anthracene, and
138
naphthalene in the gaseous phase and acenaphthene, anthracene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, and
139
fluoranthene in the particulate phase in the breathing zone of wildland firefighters in Yosemite
5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
140
National Park.21 During prescribed burning of wood piles, Robinson et al. detected only gas-
141
phase naphthalene, phenanthrene, and fluorene in personal air samples.22
142 143
The objective of our study was to characterize exposures to PAHs of wildland firefighters
144
suppressing wildland fires and conducting prescribed fires.
145 146
Methods
147
Study Participants and Location. The study population consisted of members of an
148
Interagency Hotshot Crew (IHC), a Wildland Fire Engine Crew, and participants of a prescribed
149
fire training event. Prescribed fire samples were collected in October 2014 and 2015 at two
150
annual trainings hosted by the Mid-Klamath Watershed Council and The Nature Conservancy in
151
the Klamath River region of northern California. All prescribed burns conducted were broadcast
152
burns, where fire was applied directly to a predetermined area and is confined to that space.
153
Wildland fire samples were collected at two fires, during day shifts of the Willow Fire from July
154
26, 2015 - August 1, 2015 and during night shifts at the Rough Fire from September 1 - 5, 2015.
155
The Willow Fire burned 2,307 ha (5,702 ac) in the Sierra National Forest.23 The Rough Fire
156
burned over 61,000 ha (151,623 ac) in Kings Canyon National Park, Sequoia National Forest,
157
Sierra National Forest, and adjoining state and private lands.24
158 159
Wildland firefighters perform a variety of job tasks to suppress fires; these include operating a
160
fire engine, fire line construction, holding, patrol, staging, mop-up, and firing operations. Engine
161
operators work as a part of an engine crew and operate the diesel pumps that provide water to
162
crews working near the fire. Fire line construction involves clearing vegetation and digging or
6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 25
Page 7 of 25
Environmental Science & Technology
163
scrapping down to mineral soil with hand tools to create a break in fuels to stop the spread of a
164
fire. Crew members engaged in holding walk along the active fire and check that it has not
165
crossed the fire line; if it has, suppression tactics are used to control the fire, while patrol
166
involves inspecting an inactive fire perimeter. Often crews will wait at a location near the fire to
167
hear where they have been assigned (staging). After the fire has been controlled, crews will
168
extinguish any burning material by digging out the burning material or applying water to stop
169
any smoldering material that may re-ignite a fire (mop-up). Ignition of fuels with torches filled
170
with a 3:2 diesel/unleaded gasoline mixture is used at prescribed fires, and often in wildland fire
171
suppression (firing). Additionally, when working on a large wildland fire, firefighters will sleep
172
and eat at a base camp that provides logistical support (incident command base) and is situated
173
close to the fire. Firefighters working at the Willow Fire performed the following job tasks:
174
engine operator, fire line construction, holding, mop-up and firing. At the Rough Fire,
175
firefighters performed the following job tasks: engine operator, holding, patrol, and staging.
176 177
The study protocol was approved by the UC Berkeley Committee for Protection of Human
178
Subjects and informed consent was obtained from each study participant.
179 180
Exposure Assessment. Gas-phase and particle-bound PAH samples were collected using a
181
XAD2 sorbent tube and a 37mm closed face cassette (SKC, Inc. Eighty Four, PA) with two
182
quartz fiber filters (PallFlex Tissuquartz) in series impregnated with XAD4, respectively.25–27 Air
183
was drawn through the cassettes using SKC Airchek 52 sampling pumps (SKC, Inc. Eighty Four,
184
PA) at 1.5 – 2 L/min and the XAD2 sorbent tubes using PAS-500 Micro Air Samplers (Spectrex,
185
Redwood City, Ca) sampled at 0.2 L/min. To verify flow rates, pumps were calibrated before
7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
186
and after each sampling event with representative sampling media using a Defender 510 DryCal
187
(Mesa Labs, Inc. Butler, NJ).
188 189
Sampling pumps were placed inside the pack and cassettes and XAD2 sorbent tubes were placed
190
as close to the breathing zone as possible, on the shoulder straps of each firefighter’s gear pack,
191
to prevent interference with work tasks. These packs contain emergency fire shelters, food, and
192
water and are required to be worn while firefighters are working on an active fire. Depending on
193
work schedule and location, pumps were started when crews left the incident command base
194
(ICB) or when they arrived to their work location for the day on the wildland or prescribed fire.
195 196
At the end of each shift, participants self-reported the job duty they performed during the
197
majority of their work shift and rated the smoke conditions they experienced (none, mild,
198
moderate, severe).7 Participants were also asked if they used a chainsaw during the work shift,
199
which could potentially add to their PAH exposure.
200 201
Laboratory Analysis and Quality Control. Prior to coating with XAD4, filters were baked at
202
800 °C for three hours to remove contaminants. Coated filters were stored in baked amber jars
203
until sampling. Filters were extracted by sonication in dichloromethane followed by filtration
204
under vacuum. XAD2 sorbent tubes were extracted by shaking in dichloromethane (2 mL) for
205
one hour. All analyses were performed on a gas chromatograph (Hewlett Packard model 6890)
206
equipped with a 30 m (50%-Phenyl) methylpolysiloxane-fused silica capillary column and a
207
5972 Mass Selective Detector operated in selected ion-monitoring mode. XAD2 sorbent tubes
208
were analyzed for naphthalene (NAP). Filters were analyzed for 17 PAHs: acenaphthylene
8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 25
Page 9 of 25
Environmental Science & Technology
209
(ACY), acenaphthene (ACE), fluorene (FLU), phenanthrene (PHE), anthracene (ANT),
210
fluoranthene (FLT), pyrene (PYR), and retene (RET), benz[a]anthracene (BAA), chrysene
211
(CHR), benzo[b]fluoranthene (BBF), benzo[k]fluoranthene (BKF), benzo[a]pyrene (BAP),
212
indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene (ICP), dibenz[a,h]anthracene (DBA), and benzo[ghi]perylene (BGP).
213
Sorbent tubes and filters were tested for adequate recoveries with spiked samples for the full
214
extraction and analysis procedure. The spiked recovery of naphthalene on sorbent tube was
215
114%. The mean spiked recovery for the 17 PAH measured by filter was 96%, with individual
216
PAH recoveries ranging from 78% to 127%. PAH concentrations of individual PAHs measured
217
by sorbent tubes and filters were summed for statistical analysis. However, some personal
218
samples consisted of only a filter sample and were not paired with a sorbent tube, so NAP
219
concentrations were not measured.
220 221
During the first analyses of a set of samples, selected XAD sorbent tubes and filters were
222
checked for breakthrough. If there was evidence of breakthrough, the front and back sections of
223
all filters or tubes from that sampling event were analyzed separately and the amount of
224
breakthrough was quantified. We determined breakthrough by whether the amount of each
225
analyte in the back filter or tube was greater than 25% of the total amount of analyte detected in
226
both the front and back filters or sections of sorbent tubes. Field blanks for filter cassettes (n=2-
227
4) and XAD sorbent tubes (n=2-4) were collected at each sampling event to examine
228
contamination of sampling media in the field or during transport. All samples were adjusted for
229
blank concentrations by media type and event. Blank correction for the 16 PAHs on the filters
230
was generally low with all blank mass less than 16 ng, except for fluorene at the Rough Fire. The
231
blank correction for fluorene on filters at the Rough Fire was high – 37 ng – but the
9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
232
concentrations at the Rough Fire were, on average, a magnitude higher. The blank correction
233
for naphthalene collected by sorbent tubes was 7 to 18 ng. The LQ was determined for each PAH
234
and day of laboratory analysis. The average LQ was 2.6 ng (typically 3.7 ng m-3) with a range of
235
1.0 – 5.3 ng (1.71 – 7.14 ng m3). To perform statistical analyses, samples that were less than the
236
LQ were assigned the LQ divided by 2.
237 238
Statistical Methods. Characteristics of participants and samples collected from participants are
239
presented in Table 1. PAHs were summed to create summary measures by the number of fused
240
benzene rings. We created summary metrics for low molecular weight PAHs (Σ3 ring PAH),
241
medium molecular weight PAHs (Σ4 ring PAH), high molecular weight PAHs (Σ5-6 ring PAH),
242
and a total PAH metric of 3 through six ring PAHs, composed of 15 PAHs (Σ15 PAH). These
243
summary measures did not include naphthalene or retene. The geometric mean (GM) and
244
geometric standard distribution (GSD) were calculated for each PAH analyte and summary PAH
245
metrics. We used SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC) and R v. 3.1.0 (R Foundation, Vienna,
246
Austria) for all data cleaning, calculations, and graphical processing.
247 248
Results
249 250
Twenty-five wildland firefighters participated in personal air sampling; 15 were members of an
251
IHC, 6 were members of an engine crew and 4 were members of a prescribed burn crew (Table
252
1). Participants working at wildland fires were primarily males (85%) and worked the day shift
253
(71%), while approximately half of the participants working at prescribed fires were male. Only
254
three participants (10%) at wildland fires used a chainsaw while working. All participants were
10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 25
Page 11 of 25
Environmental Science & Technology
255
non-smokers. When asked to rate their smoke exposure, participants at wildland fire and
256
prescribed fires mostly rated their smoke exposure during their work shift as mild and moderate.
257
A small subset of wildland fire participants (14%) rated their smoke exposure as severe.
258 259
The summary metrics of the PAH concentrations are reported in Table 2. Arithmetic mean and
260
standard deviation for each sampling event can be found in the Supplemental Information (Table
261
S.2). Table S.1 presents the sampling time and number of samples collected for each of personal
262
exposure sampling events. Distribution of each PAH analyte and Σ15 PAH exposures by job
263
tasks performed at prescribed fire and wildland fires are presented in Figures 1 and 2,
264
respectively
265 266
Prescribed Fire. Participants at prescribed fires reported performing firing, holding, and mop-up
267
tasks (N=3 for each task) and also twice performing a combination firing and holding tasks.
268
Personal job task samples had mean sampling times that ranged from 340 to 439 minutes (Table
269
S.2).
270 271
The PAH analyses of samples collected at prescribed fires revealed that lower molecular weight
272
PAHs were detected more frequently and at higher concentrations compared to higher molecular
273
weight PAHs. With the exception of anthracene, all 2 and 3-ring PAHs were detected in at least
274
73% of all the samples. Detection of 4, 5, and 6-ring PAHs ranged from 33% to 73% of all
275
samples collected. The GM for Σ3 ring PAH was 135 ng m-3 and contributed the most to the Σ15
276
PAH GM of 265 ng m-3 compared to the GM for Σ4 ring PAH (54 ng m-3) and Σ5-6 ring PAH
277
(25 ng m-3). The GMs of the highest concentration of PAHs measured were 669 ng m-3, 76 ng m-
11
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
278
3
, and 50 ng m-3 for NAP, RET, and PHE, respectively. NAP concentrations ranged from less
279
than 4 ng m-3 to 5073 ng m-3 and NAP was consistently was the highest measured PAH. NAP
280
GM concentration was 2.5 times higher than the Σ15 PAH GM.
281 282
PAH exposures measured at prescribed fires were found to vary by job task (Figure 1).
283
Firefighters performing firing and holding during the same shift at prescribed fires were
284
consistently exposed to significantly higher levels of PAHs compared to those doing a single task
285
-- firing, holding, or mop-up. Firing had higher concentrations of ACY, ACE, and FLT
286
compared to holding or mop-up. Firefighters performing mop-up had higher distributions of
287
PHE, FLU, and RET concentrations. Across all job categories, naphthalene was the highest
288
measured PAH with a median ranging from 304 ng m-3 for holding to 2918 ng m-3 for
289
firing/holding. When comparing Σ15 PAH across job task, firing/holding had the highest
290
median, followed by firing, holding, and mop-up.
291 292
Wildland Fire. A total of 28 XAD4-coated filters and 21 XAD-2 sorbent tubes were collected as
293
personal samples at wildland fires. Participants sampled at wildland fires mostly constructed fire
294
line (8) and performed mop-up (8) and holding (5). Personal job task samples had mean
295
sampling times that ranged from 186 to 778 minutes (Table S.1). PAHs with 2, 3 or 4 fused
296
benzene rings were consistently detected above the LQ, with the percent detected ranging from
297
75% to 100%. PAHs with 5 or 6 fused benzene rings were detected in only 29% to 75% of
298
samples collected. Breakthrough on filters was detected for ACY, ACE, FLU, PHE, ANT, FLT,
299
(all 3-ring PAHs) and PYR (a 4-ring PAH), which indicates that those samples could have been
300
an underestimate of the true concentration.
12
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 25
Page 13 of 25
Environmental Science & Technology
301 302
During wildland firefighting, Σ15 PAH mean concentration was 586 ng m-3 and ranged from 88
303
ng m-3 to 7925 ng m-3. When comparing GM concentration by molecular weight, NAP was
304
highest 3189 ng m-3 followed by Σ3 ring PAHs (429 ng m-3), Σ4 ring PAH (90 ng m-3) and Σ5-6
305
ring PAH (38 ng m-3) molecular weight PAHs. NAP and RET had the highest GM concentration
306
of all PAHs detected, 3189 ng m-3 and 3,641 ng m-3, respectively. RET was the highest single
307
measured PAH (24,562 ng m-3). PHE was also detected at elevated concentrations (GM = 210 ng
308
m-3) followed by FLU (GM = 77 ng m-3) and ACY (GM = 72 ng m-3).
309 310
Firefighters were exposed to different concentrations of PAHs based on their job task (Figure 2).
311
Firefighters performing holding, patrol, and staging tasks often had higher measured
312
concentrations of PAHs compared to firefighters performing fire line construction, firing, and
313
mop-up tasks. NAP was consistently the highest measured PAH across all job tasks, and had a
314
median concentration of 8358 ng m-3 and 3946 ng m-3 for holding and patrol tasks respectively
315
and a measured concentration of 6258 ng m-3 staging. Firefighters performing holding and patrol
316
tasks were exposed to elevated levels of benzo[a]pyrene compared to other job tasks. When
317
compared by job task, holding had the highest median for Σ15 PAH of 322 ng m-3, ranging from
318
182 to 7935 ng m-3 . Not including NAP and RET concentrations, firefighters performing engine
319
operator, holding, mop-up, patrol, and staging duties were predominantly exposed to PHE.
320
Firefighters performing firing operations were predominately exposed to FLU when compared to
321
the other 15 PAHs. Across all job tasks, the 3-ring PAHs had higher concentrations compared to
322
the 4-ring and 5-6 ring PAHs.
323
13
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Environmental Science & Technology
324
Discussion
325 326
Our study objectives were to quantify personal exposures to PAHs of firefighters exposed to
327
smoke at wildland and prescribed fires as well as off-duty at base camps (“staging”). Generally,
328
firefighters working at both wildland and prescribed fires categorized their smoke exposure as
329
mild to moderate. We detected measurable concentrations of 17 PAHs in personal samples on
330
firefighters at prescribed and wildland fires. NAP, RET, and PHE were consistently the highest
331
measured PAHs at all sampling scenarios. Lower molecular weight PAHs (Σ3ring PAH) were
332
2.5 to 11 times higher compared to Σ4 and Σ5-6 ring PAHs and contributed the most mass to the
333
Σ15 PAH metric at wildland and prescribed fires.
334 335
Our measured concentrations of PAHs were consistent with those reported by Materna et al. for
336
12 particle-phase PAHs (4 – 257 ng m-3).18,28 However, the PAH concentrations measured by
337
Reh et al. in Yosemite National Park (range 600 – 35,900 ng m-3) were higher than our measured
338
GMs and were closer to our measured maximum concentrations. Participants in that study were
339
from two Type 1 crews (N=5) and performed firing, holding, and mop-up tasks. Robinson et al.
340
evaluated PAH exposure at prescribed burning of piles, where debris is piled together and
341
burned, and were able to detect only NAP, FLU, and PHE concentrations between