Occupational Health Impacts Due to Exposure to ... - ACS Publications

Oct 30, 2016 - Environmental Science & Technology. Kijko, Margni, Partovi-Nia, Doudrich, and Jolliet. 2015 49 (14), pp 8741–8750. Abstract: Accordin...
2 downloads 3 Views 1MB Size
Subscriber access provided by CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY

Article

Occupational health impacts due to exposure to organic chemicals over an entire product life cycle Gaël Kijko, Olivier Jolliet, and Manuele Margni Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b04434 • Publication Date (Web): 30 Oct 2016 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on October 31, 2016

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 27

Environmental Science & Technology

Occupational health impacts due to exposure to organic chemicals over an entire product life cycle Gaël Kijko†*, Olivier Jolliet‡, Manuele Margni,† †

CIRAIG, Polytechnique Montréal, Chemical Engineering Department, 3333 Chemin QueenMary, Suite 310, P.O. Box 6079, Station Centre-ville, Montréal, QC, Canada, H3C 3A7 ‡

Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA

1

* Corresponding author: Phone: +1 (514)340-4711 ext. 4122. E-mail: [email protected]

2

Abstract

3

This article presents an innovative approach to include occupational exposures to organic chemicals in

4

life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) by building on the characterization factors set out in Kijko et al.

5

(2015) to calculate the potential impact of occupational exposure over the entire supply chain of product

6

or service. Based on an economic input-output model and labor and economic data, the total impacts

7

per dollar of production are provided for 430 commodity categories and range from 0.025 to 6.6

8

Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALY) per million dollar of final economic demand. The approach is

9

applied on a case study assessing human health impacts over the life cycle of a piece of office furniture.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

10

It illustrates how to combine monitoring data collected at the manufacturing facility and averaged sector

11

specific data to model the entire supply chain. This paper makes the inclusion of occupational exposure

12

to chemicals fully compatible with the LCA framework by including the supply chain of a given

13

production process and will help industries focus on the leading causes of human health impacts and

14

prevent impact shifting.

15

Introduction

16

Life cycle assessment (LCA) aims to provide decision makers with meaningful information on the

17

potential environmental impacts of different product systems in a life cycle perspective1 with the aim to

18

avoid impact shifting from one activity to another or from one life cycle stage to another2. Human health

19

(HH) impact is among the indicators considered in life cycle impact assessment (LCIA)2,with a primary

20

focus on assessing the potential impacts associated with chemicals or particulate matter emitted

21

outdoors3-5. Despite recent research efforts to integrate the occupational environment into the LCIA

22

framework

23

there is growing interest in LCIA to better account for the potentially high near-field exposures to

24

chemicals emitted in the direct vicinity of the exposed population13. Efforts to develop methods

25

integrating near-field exposures in LCA have been based on developing LCA-adapted indoor

26

compartmental models to assess the impacts of exposure to chemicals based on indoor emission data

27

during the production phase11,

28

Other methods quantify the dermally-mediated impacts of chemicals in personal care products22, 23.

29

Recently, the USEtox model, a scientific consensus model used for characterizing environmental

30

dispersion and impact of chemicals24, published its 2.0 version including a one-box indoor model for

31

near-field including household and occupational settings.

6-12

, current LCA studies have paid little attention to occupational exposure. Nevertheless,

14-19

and the product use (e.g. during cooking20, for wood products21).

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 27

Page 3 of 27

Environmental Science & Technology

32

However, intake fraction predictions and emission-based impact modeling in occupational settings

33

remain a challenge to perform over multiple industry sectors since a) workplace chemical emissions

34

during the manufacturing stage of a product are not always known or the data are not publicly available

35

as are the characteristics of the emission location; b) impacts will occur throughout the entire

36

manufacturing supply chain (unlike use phase near-field exposures, which are often clearly delineated

37

for the LCA of a given product) and c) worker populations vary by industry, worksite and workplace

38

practice. In the absence of a way to systematically apply these methods in LCA, another operational

39

method must be developed to cover the entire supply chain.

40

In addition to emissions-based impact modeling in occupational environments, other methods

41

developed to address occupational health in LCA can be classified into two categories. The first one

42

includes methods that use reported fatal and nonfatal occupational injury and illness data to calculate

43

generic characterization factors for each economic sector6-10, 25, 26. These methods are limited by the

44

data: nonfatal injury and illness data are contingent on both declaration and acknowledgement and

45

therefore induce a significant risk of undercounting6. Moreover, these methods do not provide chemical-

46

specific characterization factors, but only aggregated sector-specific industry values for all reported

47

injuries and illnesses. The second category regroups methods combining measured occupational

48

concentrations and the number of hours worked in the environment to directly determine intake, thus

49

overcoming the need to gather sector-specific emissions parameters14. Several articles in the

50

occupational health and safety and LCIA fields use this method, which generally focuses on a single

51

process or industry17, 19, 27-29. Relying on measured occupational concentrations in the workplace, Kijko et

52

al. proposed a method that provides, for each U.S. industrial sector, the chemical-specific impacts per

53

blue collar worker30 hour (BCWH) in the sector31. Blue collar workers are “manual industrial workers”

54

while white collar workers that are “persons whose job is professional or clerical and usually salaried”32.

55

The characterization factors (in DALY/BCWH), or hour-based impact intensities, developed by Kijko et al.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

56

account for 235 organic chemicals and their occupational impacts in a given manufacturing sector.

57

However, supply chain occupational impacts attributable to chemical exposures across the product life

58

cycle are not yet characterized. In this article, occupational impacts due to exposure to organic chemicals

59

occurring at the manufacturing facility producing a given product or commodity are considered to be

60

generated by emissions occurring in the sector itself, while supply chain impacts are generated by the

61

activities along the supply chains upstream the manufacturing sector (i.e. all activities of the product

62

supply chain excluding the manufacturing facility). To calculate these supply chain impacts for a given

63

product, the inventory of BCWH worked in each sector per considered functional unit (FU) must first be

64

determined. Major life cycle inventory databases such as ecoinvent33 are based on physical amounts and

65

do not provide the number of hours worked. Input-Output (IO) databases use currencies as base units34

66

but could be extended to calculate hours worked in an industry supply chain. Social LCA, and working

67

hours have, for example, been considered and integrated into the Social Hotspot Database35. Labor

68

hours (calculated using IO model) have been used to calculate to characterize international labor and

69

wage flows36. This research uses BCWH worked across the entire supply chain to inform both the

70

inventory in LCA and the calculation of impacts per hour worked.

71

This article aims to expand the scope of previous studies, in particular Kijko et al. (2015)31 and make it

72

possible to characterize potential human health impacts attributable to occupational exposures to

73

chemicals across the entire supply chain. More specifically, we aim to: (a) develop an approach to

74

compute BCWH worked throughout the supply chain per functional unit; (b) provide recommendations

75

to account for available measured data and generic data generated with IO for the supply chain; (b)

76

illustrate the application of the approach in an LCA case study that integrates human health impacts

77

from occupational exposure to organic chemicals throughout the entire life cycle and compares them to

78

other sources of human health impacts; and (d) calculate and compare manufacturing facility and supply

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 27

Page 5 of 27

Environmental Science & Technology

79

chain occupational impacts of organic chemicals per US dollars for each commodity manufactured in the

80

US;.

81

Methodology

82

By convention, in the following equations, characters with an upper arrow represent vectors and bold

83

characters represent matrices. The notation  correspond to the diagonal matrix based on vector .

84

Roman characters represent scalars. The $ symbol refers to US dollars. DALY is a unit developed by

85

Murray et al37 that serves to compare human health impacts that would be impractical to compare

86

otherwise (such as cancer and non-cancer impacts). For practical reasons, in this paper we only provide

87

aggregated results (cancer DALY and non-cancer DALY). Characterization factors (CF) for cancer cases,

88

non-cancer cases and aggregated DALY are provided in supporting information (see SI.xlsx).

89

Expanding the framework: worker health impacts over the entire supply chain

90

The starting point for this paper is the framework developed by Kijko et al.31, where human health

91

impact for effect e due to occupational exposure to chemical c in sector s (Decs, in DALY/FU) is calculated

92

as the product of the characterization factor per BCWH worked, for effect e (carcinogens or non-

93

carcinogen) due to exposure to chemical c in sector s ( , in DALY/h in the North American Industry

94

Classification System - NAICS38) and the number of hours worked in this sector s (ℎ , h):

95

 =  × ℎ

96

The  and corresponding uncertainty ranges were calculated based on measured occupational

97

concentrations from the US Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA),

98

which covers 235 chemicals in 430 industrial sectors. The total potential impact in the US manufacturing

99

industry amounts to 775 000 DALY. The global burden of disease (GBD) evaluates many risk factors

(1)

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 6 of 27

100

including occupational risks39,

40

101

tetrachloroethylene and trichloroethylene to be coherent with the GBD methodology, the total potential

102

impact in the US manufacturing industry due to exposure to organic chemicals is 300 000 DALY with

103

3 376 DALY attributed to occupational exposure to benzene. The 2005 GBD evaluates the impact of

104

occupational exposure to benzene at 5 762 DALY and occupational exposure to all carcinogens at

105

397 000 DALY39. For a more detailed analysis of the characterization factors for manufacturing facility

106

exposures, refer to Kijko et al. 201531.

107

We now extend this framework to calculate the BCWH worked in each sector over the entire supply

108

chain including the manufacturing sector. Based on Leontief’s work, the IO analysis is widely used in LCIA

109

to model the supply chain41-43 (e.g. CEDA model34) or coupled with process modeling in hybrid methods44,

110

yielding the total commodity production needed (vector , in $/FU, in the IO tables classification)45.

111



 = ( − ) × 

112

, as per the IO framework46. ( − ) The vector  may be calculated as the product of ( − ) and 

113

is composed of columns representing the total commodity production needed to produce one dollar of

114

 is the final demand vector per FU at the value of the column commodity ($/$ in IO classification). 

115

manufacturing stage ($/FU in IO classification).

116

The total commodity production may be combined with an intervention matrix : a matrix providing the

117

dollar-based work intensity (number of BCWH worked in each industry, NAICS classification) per $ of

118

commodity-specific production values (IO classification) to obtain the total BCWH worked in each NAICS

119

sector.

120

 ℎ =  × 

. When excluding potential cancer impacts from styrene,

(2)

(3)

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 7 of 27

Environmental Science & Technology

121

, we obtain the impact for effect e By combining equation 3 with equation 1 and 2, for final demand 

122

due to the occupational exposure of workers to chemical c over the entire supply chain of commodity,

123

including the manufacturing sector (  , in DALY/FU):

124

  × ℎ =   ×  ×  =   ×  × ( − ) ×   ×   = 2 

 =

125

 is the vector of characterization factor for each IO commodity (in DALY/$ or cases/$) Where 2

126

provided in supporting information (see SI.txt for the detailed factors by chemical-commodity couple or

127

SI.xlsx for the aggregated factors by IO sector). A method to calculate the impact in each IO commodity

128

or NAICS sector is described in supporting information (see Equation S1 to S16 in SI.1 and SI.2.).

129

To build the  matrix, we started with a binary matrix  of elements  !"# mapping the BCWH

130

from the NAICS classification (as rows, m sectors) into the IO classification (as columns, n sectors) using

131

conversion data from the US Bureau of Economic Analysis47. Seeing as several NAICS sectors must be

132

mapped to multiple IO sectors due to different definitions of sector boundaries, BCWH were

133

proportionally split to the total production ($, class_IO) of the IO sectors to which they are mapped. We

134

obtained a normalized conversion matrix $%&' of elements  !()*+ "# :

135

 !()*+ "# = ∑2

136

# is the total production of the IO sector j ($).

137

Then, using the same industry as technology construct used in the CEDA IO model34 we convert the IO

138

sectors into IO commodities:

139

 ×  × :9  8 × $%&' × 9  = 567

)(,-. ×/.

(4)

(5)

134()(,-1 ×/1 )

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

(6)

Environmental Science & Technology

140

 the diagonal matrix of the inverse of IO primary industry total output (1/$).  is the make With 9

141

matrix with IO sectors as rows and IO commodities as columns. Each element !"# provides the total

142

 is the diagonal matrix based on the inverse of total primary output of commodity ; per sector