Optimization of Parameters for the Generation of Hydrogen in

Nov 17, 2017 - The generation of hydrogen in steam gasification can be improved by combining slow pyrolysis and steam gasification. The study investig...
0 downloads 10 Views 3MB Size
Subscriber access provided by READING UNIV

Article

Optimization of parameters on the generation of hydrogen in combined slow pyrolysis and steam gasification of biomass Prakash Parthasarathy, Sheeba Narayanan, Selim Ceylan, and Nugroho Agung Pambudi Energy Fuels, Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b02429 • Publication Date (Web): 17 Nov 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on November 21, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Energy & Fuels is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 42

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

1

Optimization of parameters on the generation of hydrogen in combined slow

2

pyrolysis and steam gasification of biomass

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Prakash Parthasarathya, K. Sheeba Narayanana1, Selim Ceylanb, Nugroho Agung Pambudic a Fossil and Alternate Fuel Processing Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli-620 015, Tamil Nadu, India b Ondokuz Mayıs University; Faculty of Engineering, Chemical Engineering Department, Samsun, Turkey c International Institute for Carbon-Neutral Energy Research (I²CNER), Kyushu University, Japan ABSTRACT

11

The generation of hydrogen in steam gasification can be improved by combining slow pyrolysis-

12

steam gasification. The study investigates the effect of controlling parameters of slow pyrolysis-

13

steam gasification on the generation of hydrogen. In the work, some native biomass wastes were

14

first slow pyrolyzed and then the generated chars were steam gasified to generate hydrogen. In

15

slow pyrolysis, factors such as temperature, solid residence time and particle size were

16

optimized. Whilst in steam gasification, variables such as gasification temperature, residence

17

time, steam to biomass ratio, catalysts, composition of catalysts, sorbents, composition of

18

sorbents and effective catalyst-sorbent composition were optimized. Through slow pyrolysis, it

19

was ensured that only high-quality char was available to steam gasification. It was found that the

20

highest gasification temperature yielded the maximum hydrogen. It was noticed that an optimal

21

residence time and steam to biomass ratio was essential to generate maximum hydrogen.

22

Amongst the selected catalysts, KCl generated the maximum hydrogen. Of the selected sorbents,

23

CaO offered the maximum hydrogen. The combination of catalyst-sorbent (KCl-CaO) yielded

24

the maximum hydrogen. It was also observed that an optimal quantity of catalyst, sorbent, and

25

catalyst sorbent was needed to generate maximum hydrogen.

26

Keywords: Biomass, Slow pyrolysis, Steam gasification, Hydrogen 1

Corresponding author: Tel: 91 431 2503113, Fax: 91 431 2500133 Email: [email protected] 1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

27

2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 42

Page 3 of 42

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

28

Energy & Fuels

1. Introduction

29

As the fossil fuels are finite, polluting and pricey, the search for sustainable, harmless and

30

inexpensive fuels has become intense worldwide. Since last two decades, hydrogen has been

31

projected as the future of the fuel due to its varied advantages. Hydrogen is the fuel that has the

32

highest calorific value (120 MJ/kg)1. It is the only fuel which, when burnt releases no harmful

33

products. Also, hydrogen can be used as direct as well as intermediate storage fuel. As a direct

34

fuel, hydrogen is employed in fuel cell technology and in internal combustion engines. Hydrogen

35

is employed as an intermediate storage fuel in the production of gasoline, methanol, ethanol and

36

other value-added chemicals. Depending on the application, hydrogen can be used either as a

37

gaseous or liquid fuel, thus making it a versatile fuel.

38

Hydrogen is generated from sources such as natural gas, liquid hydrocarbons, coal and

39

biomass.

Processes

such

as

electrochemical,

photochemical,

photo-catalytic,

photo-

40

electrochemical, thermochemical and biochemical are employed to generate hydrogen from these

41

sources2. Among the various sources, only biomass generate hydrogen directly. The rest of the

42

sources make use of electricity to electrolyze water into hydrogen. Further, biomass could

43

generate hydrogen sustainably.

44

Currently, the recovery of hydrogen from biomass is performed by two energy

45

conversion methods such as biochemical and thermochemical method3. Biochemical methods are

46

more appropriate for starch and sugar rich feedstock. However, they are not suited to convert

47

lignocellulosic biomass4. Conversely, thermochemical methods can effectively treat lignin rich

48

biomass. Also, the cost involved with the generation of hydrogen in thermochemical methods is

49

more economical than biochemical methods5.

50

Thermochemical methods of hydrogen generation are basically centered on two

51

processes, namely pyrolysis, and gasification. Pyrolysis and gasification have been practiced by 3

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

52

mankind since ages to generate energy, fuels and value-added chemicals6,7. The thermochemical

53

route offers three modes of hydrogen generation from biomass8. The three modes are fast

54

pyrolysis of biomass superseded by subsequent steam reforming of bio-oil, supercritical water

55

gasification of biomass, and steam gasification of biomass. The process of fast pyrolysis

56

generates less hydrogen yield. Supercritical water gasification is still to be proven and at present,

57

its H2 production cost is not economical. Relative to other two processes, steam gasification

58

generates more hydrogen. Furthermore, steam gasification is an established technology. Hence,

59

in this study steam gasification was chosen.

60

The performance of steam gasification could be enhanced by integrating slow pyrolysis-

61

steam gasification techniques. The integration of these two processes : improve thermal

62

efficiency, generate high quality syngas, augment hydrogen yield, and decrease tar yield9–11.

63

There are many literatures on slow pyrolysis of biomass, steam gasification of biomass, and

64

steam gasification of char12–16. However, investigation on slow pyrolysis-steam gasification of

65

biomass aimed at improving hydrogen yield has not been done yet. Henceforth, in the current

66

study, the influence of slow pyrolysis-steam gasification parameters on hydrogen generation was

67

studied. In slow pyrolysis, the effect of temperature, solid residence time and particle size on

68

char generation was investigated. In steam gasification, the influence of gasification temperature,

69

residence time, steam to biomass ratio (S/B), catalysts (NaCl, K2Cr2O7 and KCl), composition of

70

catalysts, sorbents (Al2O3, CaCl2, CaO) composition of sorbents and effective catalyst-sorbent

71

composition on hydrogen generation was studied.

72

2. Materials and Methods

73

2.1.Biomass and Characterization of samples

74

The photographs of the selected biomass source are presented in Figure 1. Though wheat

75

is not cultivated in Tamilnadu, usage of wheat husk as fodder is a common practice here. The 4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 42

Page 5 of 42

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

76

collected biomass wastes were sundried until the moisture content was below 15 %. The true

77

density of samples was measured using pycnometer. ASTM E873-06 was followed to measure

78

the bulk density of samples. The mean particle diameter of the samples was determined as

79

followed elsewhere17. The proximate analysis was done in line to ASTM D3173, ASTM D3174

80

and ASTM D3175 standards. An Elementar Vario EL III analyzer was used to perform elemental

81

analysis. The higher heating value (HHV) of samples was determined using a correlation

82

followed elsewhere18. Table 1. presents the results of density, particle size, proximate, ultimate,

83

and heating value analysis of the samples. The ash analysis was done using FEI ESEM Quanta

84

200 scanning electron microscope (SEM) with Energy Dispersive X-ray analysis (EDAX)

85

detector. The major mineral composition present in the ash of samples is presented in Table 2.

86

The analysis procedures employed elsewhere was followed to determine the wet chemical

87

analysis of the samples19,20. The results of wet chemical analysis are presented in Table 3.

88

2.2.Bench scale slow pyrolysis

89

Before performing the combined slow pyrolysis-steam gasification, it was necessary to

90

determine the effective operating conditions suitable for generating optimized char yield in slow

91

pyrolysis. Hence, bench scale slow pyrolysis experiments were conducted first. Experiments

92

were performed in a tubular reactor and the heat for the system was supplied using a tubular

93

furnace. For every experimental run, exactly 5 g of samples were loaded into the reactor.

94

Nitrogen gas of purity 99.95 % was purged for 15 min into the system before and after pyrolysis.

95

The char collected after was quantified and taken for further analysis. Pyrolysis is the process in

96

which the volatiles are liberated, and carbon content of the feed is enriched. For char to be used

97

as fuel, the carbon content should be greater than 75 %21. Hence, in this study, pyrolysis

98

parameters were optimized till high quality char (≥75 % carbon content) was obtained. This 75

99

% carbon content includes primarily fixed carbon and some amount of volatile carbon22. 5

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

100

First, slow pyrolysis experiments were performed at different temperatures of 300, 350, 400,

101

450, 500 and 550 °C at a residence time of 30 min using samples of average particle size (refer

102

Table 1). Then, with an optimized temperature of char yield (75 % carbon content), experiments

103

were conducted at a varying solid residence time of 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 min with samples

104

of average particle size. Finally, with optimized temperature and solid residence time,

105

experiments were conducted changing feedstock particle size of 90