Subscriber access provided by READING UNIV
Letter
Organic Photovoltaics with Stacked Graphene Anodes Ehsan Keyvani-Someh, Zachariah Hennighausen, William Lee, Rachna C. K. Igwe, Mohamed E Kramdi, Swastik Kar, and Hicham Fenniri ACS Appl. Energy Mater., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.7b00020 • Publication Date (Web): 12 Dec 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on December 12, 2017
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
ACS Applied Energy Materials is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Applied Energy Materials
Organic Photovoltaics with Stacked Graphene Anodes Ehsan Keyvani-Someh,1 Zachariah Hennighausen,4 William Lee,1 Rachna C. K. Igwe,1 Mohamed Elamine Kramdi,1, Swastik Kar,4 and Hicham Fenniri1-3,* 1
Department of Chemical Engineering, 2Department of Bioengineering, 3Department of
Chemistry and Chemical Biology, 4Department of Physics, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115-5000 KEYWORDS: Organic photovoltaics, graphene, stacking, transparent electrodes, thin films
*Corresponding author:
[email protected] ACS Paragon Plus Environment
1
ACS Applied Energy Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 2 of 15
ABSTRACT Graphene has recently been used to achieve power conversion efficiencies (PCE) equal to those of ITO-based devices, although they remain a challenging and costly replacement for ITO. Herein, we employed chemical vapor deposition (CVD) to grow graphene islands and transferred them onto a transparent substrate. The resulting stacked graphene films were characterized by Raman and UV-Vis spectroscopy, and conductivity measurements. Solar cells fabricated with stacked graphene (1-4 layers)/PEDOT:PSS/P3HT:PCBM/Ca/Al architecture showed an enhancement of PCE as a function of the number of stacked layers. The highest efficiency was measured for the double-layered graphene anode because of its optimal conductance and transmittance. This work establishes that readily prepared layered graphene islands are a viable and economical substitute for ITO.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
2
Page 3 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Applied Energy Materials
To overcome some of the limitation of inorganic solar cells, organic photovoltaics (OPVs) have been introduced because of their mechanical flexibility, light weight, solution processability, recyclability, and affordability, which could fulfill key requirements needed for an alternative energy source to supplement or replace current electrical systems.1-4 Indium tin oxide (ITO) is the most common electrode material in OPV devices because of its high transmittance and conductivity.5,6 Since it is the costliest component of the architecture, it remains a significant hindrance to the fabrication of solar cells.
Graphene with high
conductivity, electron mobility, and transparency has all the ingredients for a viable replacement material.7,8 Although several groups reported equal or higher power conversion efficiency (PCE) for high quality graphene anodes compared to ITO-based devices, the high cost associated with producing these graphene electrodes limits their large scale adoption.9-12
To expedite the
fabrication and extend the life of graphene-based electrodes, chemical vapor deposition (CVD) was performed on a copper foil and the CVD-grown graphene was transferred onto a transparent substrate.13-16 Reported PCEs for CVD-grown graphene-based OPVs were much lower than ITObased solar cells due to the formation of graphene islands and the difficulty in preventing folding during film transfer.17,18 We reasoned that stacking multiple graphene layers would enhance the conductivity by increasing surface coverage and decreasing sheet resistance.19-23 In this report, we establish an efficient and simple stacking method of CVD-grown graphene films and investigate their effectiveness in bulk hetero-junction OPVs. Graphene fabrication. The quality of the CVD-grown graphene was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and optical microscopy. A typical SEM micrograph (Figure 1a) of a single layer of graphene (light gray areas) shows incomplete surface coverage as well as the formation of small folded domains. Although all of the CVD and transfer parameters were kept
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
3
ACS Applied Energy Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 4 of 15
identical, different sheet formations were observed in each sample, while the degree of coverage and physical properties were consistent across samples. A schematic representation of overlapping islands in a two-layer stack (Figure 1b, upper islands in grey and lower islands in black). The optical image of a 2-layer graphene film (Figure 1c) shows full coverage as well as folded domains resulting in randomly-distributed thicker areas (bright spots). As anticipated, as the number of layers increases, graphene films absorb more light and the film turn darker. Spectroscopic and conductivity measurements. The effect of CVD growth conditions on graphene film thickness was examined using Raman spectroscopy
as
transmittance
and
this
parameter
affects
Figure 1. (a) SEM micrograph of a single conductivity.
As
the
graphene layer showing incomplete surface
transmittance decreases, less light can reach the coverage. (b) Schematic representation of 2 active layer of the solar cell, resulting in lower overlapping graphene layers. (c) Optical image of 2 overlapping graphene layers on efficiency. On the other hand, the stacking glass substrate. The inset shows single (black increases surface coverage, which is essential for arrows) and double layers (white arrows). The generating a conductive layer.22 Thus, striking a bright spots result from partially folded graphene islands. balance between transparency and surface coverage
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
4
Page 5 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Applied Energy Materials
is crucial.26 The ratio of 2D to G bands in the Raman spectra is a direct measure of the number of graphene layers in the film (Figure 2a). As the intensity and width of these characteristic vibrations changes with film thickness (i.e. peaks broaden/weaken with the number of stacked graphene layers), we can directly and quantitatively assess the success of our CVDgenerated graphene transfer using standard Raman spectroscopy (Figure 2a).24 The absorbance of the samples was measured by UV-Vis spectroscopy (Figure 2b) and the transmittance was found to remain constant across
the
entire
visible
spectrum.
Transparency values went from 93.8 ± 5.9% (1 layer), 89.29 ± 3.4% (2 layers), 75.53 ±
Figure 2. (a) Raman spectra of graphene based on the number of transfers. As the number of the
3.3% (3 layers), 61.9 ± 5.6% (4 layers). In layers increases, 2D/G bands ratio decreases. (b) addition,
the
absorption
hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl)
of
Poly
(P3HT),
(3- Transmittance of stacked graphene samples across the
the visible spectrum. (c) Average sheet resistance of stacked graphene decreases most significantly
electron donor used in our studies, is in the after the second transfer. range of 400 to 700 nm where stacked graphene shows high transparency.25 Finally, The resistance of the samples was measured by calibrated 2-point probe. Graphene samples showed
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
5
ACS Applied Energy Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 6 of 15
Figure 3. a) Fabricated organic solar cell, from anode to cathode: graphene anode on a glass substrate, PEDOT:PSS (hole injection layer), P3HT:PCBM (photoactive layer), calcium (electron transport layer), and aluminum cathode.
b) Current density versus Voltage of
graphene-based OPVs. ohmic behavior through the entire sweep range. The average sheet resistance (Rs) was measured for the stacked graphene (Figure 2c) and was found to decrease as the number of layers increased (1 layer: 49.35 KΩ/sq, 2 layers: 28.99 KΩ/sq, 3 layers: 24.16 KΩ/sq, 4 layers: 19.5 KΩ/sq). Our results confirm that sheet resistance does not decrease significantly after the second deposition cycle and therefore the 2-layers film appeared to be an optimal compromise between good transparency and sheet resistance. OPV fabrication and characterization. Organic solar cells with the following architecture graphene/PEDOT:PSS/P3HT:PCBM/Ca/Al as well as the corresponding control devices with ITO as transparent anode were fabricated as shown in Figure 3a, and their PCE’s were measured. Figure 3b shows I-V measurements of the fabricated solar cells with graphene anodes and the corresponding data is summarized in Table 1. The PCE of the single layer graphene samples were found to be ca. 10 fold lower compared to ITO-based samples as a result of lower
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
6
Page 7 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Applied Energy Materials
short circuit current. The significantly lower current density of graphene compared to ITO results in less efficient charge transfer from the active layer to graphene and increased charge recombination, which leads to lower current generation. For the same reasons, the open circuit voltage is also lower for all graphene-based OPVs (ca. 59-73% of Voc for ITO-based devices). However, stacking increased the Voc, FF, and Jsc. Overlapping graphene islands therefore provide better coverage on the anode side, which promotes hole extraction. Table 1. PCE parameters for graphene and ITO based OPVs Anode
Voc
Jsc
FF
PCE
Single transfer
0.33 ± 0.07
4.09 ± 1.30
0.25 ± 0.03
0.34 ± 0.04
Double transfer
0.39 ± 0.03
5.21 ± 0.70
0.42 ± 0.03
0.89 ± 0.07
Triple transfer
0.40 ± 0.03
5.00 ± 1.30
0.41 ± 0.05
0.82 ± 0.10
Quadruple transfer
0.41 ± 0.20
4.90 ± 1.00
0.36 ± 0.02
0.74 ± 0.04
ITO
0.56 ± 0.01
11.6 ± 1.00
0.54 ± 0.02
3.56 ± 0.30
The highest PCE achieved for graphene cells was obtained for a 2-layer stacked graphene film (Table 1). For 3 and 4 graphene layers, the PCE is slightly lower and it is anticipated that the trend will continue. As stacking more than 2 layers is not significantly improving PCE, increasing the number of layers would negatively impact the transmittance which would have a larger effect on lowering the PCE.27 We anticipate however that improved graphene preparation and device fabrication conditions (controlled atmosphere, better surface coverage and overlap between graphene layers) would significantly improve the PCE. Our studies have shown that stacked graphene could be a cost-effective and viable replacement for ITO. Indeed, for every 1 W of power produced with an ITO-based device, commercial graphene-based devices and stacked graphene-based devices of the same cost would produce ca.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
7
ACS Applied Energy Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 8 of 15
0.02 W and 1.5 W, respectively (Table S1, supporting information). When estimating our costs, we factored-in materials, equipment, and labor costs, and then added a 10% overhead for unexpected spending (e.g. calibrations, instrumental errors). The main reasons for the costeffectiveness of our devices relative to commercial graphene devices stems from our ability to relax our design requirements in three key areas: (a) graphene single layer coverage does not need to be extensive. While commercial graphene has 95% monolayer coverage, our devices require ca. 85% monolayer coverage, (b) polycrystalline graphene is acceptable for our OPVs, and (c) nucleation sites with bi- or tri-layer graphene are also acceptable. Following these relaxed criteria, our straightforward and inexpensive procedure allowed us to fabricate devices with high reproducibility. In summary, CVD-grown graphene was assembled on glass to generate a conducting anode layer as a potential replacement for ITO in OPVs. Stacking graphene layers resulted in improved conductance. PCE was optimal for 2-layer graphene films, as more layers resulted in decreased transmittance and did not impart significantly better conductance. The graphene anodes produced with our method are more than 80 times more cost-effective (PCE/cost) than commercially available graphene and 50% less costly than ITO-based devices (Table S2). In addition, ITO’s brittle nature does not allow for the fabrication of flexible solar cells, which can be solved using graphene.28,29 Finally, we envision that the use of Langmuir-Blodgett technology to generate continuous graphene films from graphene islands would further improve the conductivity of the graphene anodes and the PCE of the resulting OPVs; work to demonstrate this approach is in progress in our laboratories. Supporting Information. Optical microscopy images, fabrication procedures, cost analysis. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
8
Page 9 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Applied Energy Materials
AUTHOR INFORMATION Corresponding Author Hicham Fenniri:
[email protected] ACKNOWLEDGMENT We acknowledge the support of Northeastern University and the National Science Foundation (NSF ECCS CAREER 1351424 to SK). ABBREVIATIONS ITO, Indium tin oxide; OPV, Organic photovoltaic; PCE, Power conversion efficiency; CVD, Chemical
vapor
deposition;
UV-Vis,
Ultraviolet-visible;
PEDOT:PSS,
poly
(3,4-
ethylenedioxythiophene) poly styrene sulfonate ; P3HT, Poly (3-hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl)
;
PCBM, Phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester ; Al, Aluminum; SEM, Scanning electron microscopy; Rs, Sheet resistance; FF, Fill factor; Voc, Open circuit voltage; Jsc, Short circuit current density; HIL, Hole injection layer; ETL, Electron transport layer, Cu, Copper; PMMA, Poly methyl methacrylate. REFERENCES (1)
El Chaar, L.; Lamont, L. a.; El Zein, N. Review of Photovoltaic Technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2011, 15, 2165–2175.
(2)
Capasso, A.; Salamandra, L.; Faggio, G.; Dikonimos, T.; Buonocore, F.; Morandi, V.; Ortolani, L.; Lisi, N. Chemical Vapor Deposited Graphene-Based Derivative As HighPerformance Hole Transport Material for Organic Photovoltaics. ACS Applied Materials and Interface 2016, 8, 23844-23853.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
9
ACS Applied Energy Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
(3)
Page 10 of 15
Schaffer, C. J.; Schlipf, J.; Dwi Indari, E.; Su, B.; Bernstorff, S.; Müller-Buschbaum, P. Effect of Blend Composition and Additives on the Morphology of PCPDTBT:PC71BM Thin Films for Organic Photovoltaics. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces 2015, 7, 21347–21355.
(4)
Morse, G. E.; Gantz, J. L.; Steirer, K. X.; Armstrong, N. R.; Bender, T. P. Pentafluorophenoxy Boron Subphthalocyanine (F5BsubPc) as a Multifunctional Material for Organic Photovoltaics. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces 2014, 6, 1515–1524.
(5)
Elshobaki, M.; Anderegg, J.; Chaudhary, S. Efficient Polymer Solar Cells Fabricated on poly(3,4-Ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate)-Etched Old Indium Tin Oxide Substrates. ACS applied materials & interfaces 2014, 6, 12196–12202.
(6)
Wang, J.; Zhang, J.; Meng, B.; Zhang, B.; Xie, Z.; Wang, L. Facile Preparation of Molybdenum Bronzes as an Efficient Hole Extraction Layer in Organic Photovoltaics. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces 2015, 7, 13590–13596.
(7)
Gomez De Arco L, Zhang Y, Schlenker CW, Ryu K, Thompson ME, Z. C. Continuous, Highly Flexible, and Transparent Graphene Films by Chemical Vapor Deposition for Organic Photovoltaics. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 2865–2873.
(8)
Mansour, A. E.; Dey, S.; Amassian, A.; Tanielian, M. H. Bromination of Graphene: A New Route to Making High Performance Transparent Conducting Electrodes with Low Optical Losses. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2015, 7, 17692–17699.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
10
Page 11 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Applied Energy Materials
(9)
Park, H.; Chang, S.; Zhou, X.; Kong, J.; Palacios, T.; Gradečak, S. Flexible Graphene Electrode-Based Organic Photovoltaics with Record-High Efficiency. Nano Letters 2014, 14, 5148–5154.
(10)
Chang, J. K.; Lin, W. H.; Taur, J. I.; Chen, T. H.; Liao, G. K.; Pi, T. W.; Chen, M. H.; Wu, C. I. Graphene Anodes and Cathodes: Tuning the Work Function of Graphene by Nearly 2 eV with an Aqueous Intercalation Process. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces 2015, 7, 17155–17161.
(11)
Wu, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, L.; Gao, W.; Zhang, T.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Yu, W. W. Colloidal PbSe Solar Cells with Molybdenum Oxide Modified Graphene Anodes. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces 2015, 7, 21082–21088.
(12)
Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhong, Y.; Zhu, F.; Loh, K. P. Large Area, Continuous, FewLayered Graphene as Anodes in Organic Photovoltaic Devices. Applied Physics Letters 2009, 95, 129–132.
(13)
Babichev, A. V.; Rykov, S. A.; Tchernycheva, M.; Smirnov, A. N.; Davydov, V. Y.; Kumzerov, Y. A.; Butko, V. Y. Influence of Substrate Microstructure on the Transport Properties of CVD-Graphene. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces 2016, 8, 240–246.
(14)
Tsai, L. W.; Tai, N. H. Enhancing the Electrical Properties of a Flexible Transparent Graphene-Based Field-Effect Transistor Using Electropolished Copper Foil for Graphene Growth. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces 2014, 6, 10489–10496.
(15)
Tien, D. H.; Park, J. Y.; Kim, K. B.; Lee, N.; Choi, T.; Kim, P.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Seo, Y. Study of Graphene-Based 2D-Heterostructure Device Fabricated by All-Dry
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
11
ACS Applied Energy Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 12 of 15
Transfer Process. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces 2016, 8, 3072–3078. (16)
Gao, L.; Ni, G.-X.; Liu, Y.; Liu, B.; Castro Neto, A. H.; Loh, K. P. Face-to-Face Transfer of Wafer-Scale Graphene Films. Nature 2014, 505, 190–194.
(17)
Chen, W.; Gui, X.; Liang, B.; Liu, M.; Lin, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Tang, Z. Controllable Fabrication of Large-Area Wrinkled Graphene on a Solution Surface. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces 2016, 8, 10977–10984.
(18)
Sun, Z.; Raji, A. R. O.; Zhu, Y.; Xiang, C.; Yan, Z.; Kittrell, C.; Samuel, E. L. G.; Tour, J. M. Large-Area Bernal-Stacked Bi-, Tri-, and Tetralayer Graphene. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 9790–9796.
(19)
Choi, Y. Y.; Kang, S. J.; Kim, H. K.; Choi, W. M.; Na, S. I. Multilayer Graphene Films as Transparent Electrodes for Organic Photovoltaic Devices. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 2012, 96, 281–285.
(20)
Lee, S.; Yeo, J.-S.; Ji, Y.; Cho, C.; Kim, D.-Y.; Na, S.-I.; Lee, B. H.; Lee, T. Flexible Organic Solar Cells Composed of P3HT:PCBM Using Chemically Doped Graphene Electrodes. Nanotechnology 2012, 23, 344013.
(21)
Park, J. S.; Cho, S. M.; Kim, W.-J.; Park, J.; Yoo, P. J. Fabrication of Graphene Thin Films Based on Layer-by-Layer Self-Assembly of Functionalized Graphene Nanosheets. ACS applied materials & interfaces 2011, 3, 360–368.
(22)
Kim, K.; Bae, S. H.; Toh, C. T.; Kim, H.; Cho, J. H.; Whang, D.; Lee, T. W.; Özyilmaz, B.; Ahn, J. H. Ultrathin Organic Solar Cells with Graphene Doped by Ferroelectric
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
12
Page 13 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Applied Energy Materials
Polarization. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces 2014, 6, 3299–3304. (23)
Tsen, A. W.; Brown, L.; Havener, R. W.; Park, J. Polycrystallinity and Stacking in CVD Graphene. Accounts of Chemical Research 2013, 46, 2286–2296.
(24)
Zhao, H.; Lin, Y. C.; Yeh, C. H.; Tian, H.; Chen, Y. C.; Xie, D.; Yang, Y.; Suenaga, K.; Ren, T. L.; Chiu, P. W. Growth and Raman Spectra of Single-Crystal Trilayer Graphene with Different Stacking Orientations. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 10766–10773.
(25)
Chen, D.; Nakahara, A.; Wei, D.; Nordlund, D.; Russell, T. P. P3HT/PCBM Bulk Heterojunction Organic Photovoltaics: Correlating Efficiency and Morphology. Nano Letters 2011, 11, 561–567.
(26)
Choe, M.; Lee, B. H.; Jo, G.; Park, J.; Park, W.; Lee, S.; Hong, W. K.; Seong, M. J.; Kahng, Y. H.; Lee, K.; Lee, T. Efficient Bulk-Heterojunction Photovoltaic Cells with Transparent Multi-Layer Graphene Electrodes. Organic Electronics: physics, materials, applications 2010, 11, 1864–1869.
(27)
Hsu, C. L.; Lin, C. Te; Huang, J. H.; Chu, C. W.; Wei, K. H.; Li, L. J. Layer-by-Layer graphene/TCNQ Stacked Films as Conducting Anodes for Organic Solar Cells. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 5031–5039.
(28)
Seo, H. K.; Park, M. H.; Kim, Y. H.; Kwon, S. J.; Jeong, S. H.; Lee, T. W. Laminated Graphene Films for Flexible Transparent Thin Film Encapsulation. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces 2016, 8, 14725–14731.
(29)
Yin, J.; Zhou, H.; Liu, Z.; Nie, Z.; Li, Y.; Qi, X.; Chen, B.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X. Indium-
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
13
ACS Applied Energy Materials 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 14 of 15
and Platinum-Free Counter Electrode for Green Mesoscopic Photovoltaics through Graphene Electrode and Graphene Composite Catalysts: Interfacial Compatibility. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces 2016, 8, 5314–5319.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
14
Page 15 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Applied Energy Materials
Table of Content. Fabrication of multi-layer graphene. CVD-grown graphene on Cu was transferred to a transparent substrate such as glass or PET. By repeating the transfer and deposition of graphene on top of another graphene layer, multi-layer graphene was fabricated.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
15