Organophosphorus Flame Retardants and Plasticizers in Building and

Sep 3, 2017 - Key Laboratory of Industrial Ecology and Environmental Engineering (MOE), School of Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian Univers...
6 downloads 27 Views 798KB Size
Subscriber access provided by Karolinska Institutet, University Library

Article

Organophosphorus flame retardants and plasticizers in building and decoration materials and their potential burdens in newly decorated houses in China Yan Wang, Minmin Hou, Qiaonan Zhang, Xiaowei Wu, Hongxia Zhao, Qing Xie, and Jingwen Chen Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03367 • Publication Date (Web): 03 Sep 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on September 3, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 31

Environmental Science & Technology

1

Organophosphorus flame retardants and plasticizers in building and decoration

2

materials and their potential burdens in newly decorated houses in China

3

Yan Wang

4

Qing Xie †, Jingwen Chen

5



†,









*, Minmin Hou , Qiaonan Zhang , Xiaowei Wu , Hongxia Zhao , †

Key Laboratory of Industrial Ecology and Environmental Engineering (MOE),

6

School of Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology,

7

Dalian 116024, China

8 9 10

* Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-411-84707965; Fax: +86-411-84707965

11 12

1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

13

Abstract

14

Organophosphorus flame retardants (OPFRs) have been increasingly used in

15

various building and decoration materials to fulfill fire safety standards since the

16

phasing out of polybrominated diphenyl ethers. We determined OPFR concentrations

17

in the most commonly used building and decoration materials available in local

18

markets and online in China. The OPFR concentrations varied significantly, from

19

14.78 ng/g (putty powder) to 9,649,000 ng/g (expanded polystyrene panel (EPS)).

20

Relatively high concentrations of OPFRs were found in foam samples, followed by

21

non-woven and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) wallpaper, PVC pipes, sealing materials,

22

boards, and paints. Low concentrations were found mostly in wall decoration powders,

23

suggesting that no OPFRs had been added to these powders. Tris(1-chloro-2-propyl)

24

phosphate and tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate were the most detected

25

halogenated OPFRs, while tri-n-butyl phosphate and tris(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate

26

were the dominant non-halogenated OPFRs, implying that they are commonly used in

27

building and decoration materials. The estimated OPFR burden in interior decoration

28

using non-woven wallpaper was 330- and 2,110-fold higher than that using latex paint

29

and diatomite, respectively. The emission periods of OPFRs from non-woven and

30

PVC wallpaper may be greater than 13 years. We estimated that the total burden of

31

OPFRs for decoration using wallpaper in newly decorated houses in China is ~63 t/y.

32

Significantly high concentrations of OPFRs in interior decoration materials, especially

33

non-woven wallpaper, pose potential health risks to the people using the buildings.

34 2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 31

Page 3 of 31

Environmental Science & Technology

35

Keywords: Organophosphorus flame retardants; Plasticizers; OPEs; Decoration

36

materials; Wallpaper

37 38

Abstract Graphic

39 40 41

3

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

42

1. Introduction

43

Due to their persistence, bioaccumulation, and toxicity (Kefeni et al., 2011;

44

Vonderheide et al., 2008), penta- and octa-polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs)

45

were listed as the persistent organic pollutants (POPs) by the Stockholm Convention

46

in 2009, and are gradually being phased out from the market (Abbasi et al., 2016;

47

Stasinska et al., 2014). Organophosphorus flame retardants (OPFRs) have been widely

48

used as suitable alternatives in consumer products and building materials in recent

49

years. The total annual global consumption of OPFRs was 210,000 tons in 2004

50

(Möller et al., 2012), while the yield of OPFRs in China reached 70,000 tons in 2007

51

and is projected to increase by 15% annually (Wei et al., 2015). OPFRs are frequently

52

present as additives rather than chemically bonded to the final products, which allows

53

their easy release into the environment via abrasion, volatilization, and leaching

54

during their lifetime (Marklund et al., 2003; Wei et al., 2015). Hence, OPFRs have

55

been widely detected in various environmental matrices, including air, water,

56

sediment, and soil (Mihajlović et al., 2011; Rodil et al., 2012; Salamova et al., 2014),

57

as well as air and dust in indoor environments (He et al., 2015; Marklund et al.,

58

2005a). Furthermore, OPFRs have also been detected in human breast milk (Kim et al.,

59

2014; Sundkvist et al., 2010) and blood (Zhao et al., 2016). Human exposure to

60

OPFRs occurs mainly via inhalation, ingestion, and dermal absorption in the indoor

61

environment where people typically spend over 20 h per day (Hou et al., 2016).

62

Chlorinated OPFRs are suspected carcinogens, while tricresyl phosphate (TCrP) and

63

tributyl phosphate (TnBP) have been shown to be potential thyroid hormone 4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 31

Page 5 of 31

Environmental Science & Technology

64

disruptors and can cause reproductive toxicity (van der Veen and de Boer, 2012;

65

Zhang et al., 2016).

66

Previous studies found an increase in organic flame retardant (OFR)

67

concentrations in indoor air when OFR-containing products were installed in the room

68

(Muenhor and Harrad, 2012) and demonstrated significant relationships between

69

housing characteristics (e.g., number of consumer products and flooring materials)

70

and PBDE and hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) levels in indoor air (de Wit et al.,

71

2012), as well as OPFR levels in indoor dust (Araki et al., 2014). Furthermore,

72

significant associations have been detected between OFR levels in house dust and

73

their burdens in the human body (Stapleton et al., 2012a; Wu et al., 2007). Building

74

decoration materials and household products are postulated sources of OFRs in indoor

75

air and dust (Allen et al., 2008; Marklund et al., 2005a). Given the health concerns, it

76

is important to investigate the use and application of OFRs in common household

77

goods and decoration materials to evaluate their health risks.

78

There have been few studies related to OFR levels, particularly OPFR levels, in

79

consumer products. Most studies have focused on plastics from electronic appliances

80

(Abbasi et al., 2016; Vojta et al., 2017), polyurethane foams (PUFs) for furniture and

81

upholsteries (Cooper et al., 2016; Stapleton et al., 2009; Stapleton et al., 2011;

82

Stapleton et al., 2012b), and textiles (Ionas et al., 2015; Shin and Baek, 2012). Only a

83

few studies have evaluated the OFRs in interior housing decoration materials, which

84

are key sources of OFRs in the indoor environment (Ingerowski et al., 2001; Kajiwara

85

et al., 2011; Vojta et al., 2017). Ingerowski et al. (2001) found high levels of tris 5

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

86

(1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TCPP) and tris (2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP) in

87

wood-preservation coatings, foam fillers, floor sealing materials, and wallpaper in

88

Germany, whereas the highest concentrations of triphenyl phosphate (TPhP) were

89

detected in wallpaper in Japan (Kajiwara et al., 2011). Meanwhile, high levels of

90

HBCDs have been found in mounting and sealant foam, oriented strand board, and

91

other composite woods in Europe (Vojta et al., 2017).

92

However, there is still a lack of information regarding the species and

93

concentrations of OPFRs used in various indoor building and decoration materials,

94

especially in China. Therefore, in this study, we determined the concentrations of 10

95

OPFRs in various commonly used interior decoration materials, categorized as

96

wallpaper, latex paints, sealing materials, wall decoration powders, foams, line pipes,

97

and board materials, to identify the common types of OPFRs currently used and the

98

potential OPFR sources in the indoor environment. Furthermore, the OPFR burdens in

99

newly decorated houses related to human exposure were also estimated for different

100

wall decoration materials.

101 102

2. Materials and methods

103

2.1 Sample collection

104

A total of 56 samples were divided into seven categories: wallpaper (12), wall

105

decoration powders (5), latex paints (6), sealing materials (13), boards (14), PVC

106

pipes and boxes (4), and foam materials (2). Each type of material included two to

107

seven different famous and popular brands or prices. Some samples were purchased 6

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 31

Page 7 of 31

Environmental Science & Technology

108

directly from markets in Dalian or from Chinese online shops, while others were

109

obtained from neighbors who were decorating their houses from January to May of

110

2016. Each sample consisted of 3-5 subsamples collected from 1-3 houses or 1-2

111

online shops. Details for the samples are presented in Supporting Information (SI)

112

Table S1.

113 114

2.2 Sample preparation and extraction

115

Wallpaper and foam samples were directly cut into pieces (