Subscriber access provided by University of Sunderland
Characterization of Natural and Affected Environments
Oxygen consumption and organic matter remineralization in two subtropical, eutrophic coastal embayments Hongjie Wang, Xinping Hu, Michael Wetz, and Kenneth C Hayes Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02971 • Publication Date (Web): 22 Oct 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on October 24, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 40
Environmental Science & Technology
1
Oxygen consumption and organic matter remineralization in two subtropical,
2
eutrophic coastal embayments
3
Hongjie Wang1, Xinping Hu1, Michael Wetz2, Kenneth Hayes2
4
1. Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences, Texas A&M University – Corpus
5
Christi
6
2. Department of Life Sciences, Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi
7
Manuscript prepared for Environmental Science & Technology
8 9 10
*
Corresponding author:
Xinping Hu (
[email protected], Tel: 361-825-3395)
11 12
Keyword
13
Dissolved Oxygen, Hypoxia, Stable Isotopes, Estuary, Lagoon, Eutrophication
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
1
Environmental Science & Technology
14 15
Page 2 of 40
Abstract There is a strong need to understand sources of organic matter to coastal lagoons, as
16
these systems often have long water residence times, are susceptible to eutrophication,
17
and display symptoms such as low oxygen conditions. We found that the integrated
18
dissolved oxygen (DO) consumption in the water column accounted for 67~73% of total
19
DO consumption in two eutrophic coastal lagoons (Baffin Bay and Oso Bay) in the
20
northwestern Gulf of Mexico. δ13C of particulate organic carbon (δ13CPOC) showed
21
temporal variations that corresponded with hydrological condition changes in Baffin Bay
22
but less temporal changes in Oso Bay, whereas the lower δ15NPON values in Baffin Bay
23
indicated more of agricultural influence than in Oso Bay, where urban sewage influences
24
dominated. Based on closed-system incubation experiments, water column respiration in
25
Baffin Bay was driven by the respiration of a combination of phytoplankton, carbon from
26
nearshore and benthic macrophytes, and other allochthonous organic carbon sources
27
depending on hydrological conditions. However, respiration of algal carbon dominated
28
DO consumption in Baffin Bay sediments. In comparison, Oso Bay water column
29
respiration was largely attributed to the degradation of phytoplankton, the growth of
30
which was sustained by nutrient discharge from wastewater treatment plants in the
31
watershed. Contrasting to the water column, seagrass and saltmarsh carbon appeared to
32
be the primary organic carbon source that drove DO consumption in Oso Bay sediments.
33
These observations highlight the complexity of organic carbon sources that contribute to
34
DO consumption in estuaries affected by human activities, especially in systems with
35
long water residence times that can retain both organic matter and nutrients for extended
36
periods of time.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
2
Page 3 of 40
Environmental Science & Technology
37
Table of Contents (TOC)/Abstract Art
Baffin Bay Water -10
Water column POC Water column DOC
-13
Remineralized OC
13C
-16 -19 -22 -25 -28 -31 10 38
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Salinity
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
3
Environmental Science & Technology
39
Page 4 of 40
1. Introduction
40
Cultural eutrophication is a major environmental threat facing coastal ecosystems
41
worldwide 1-3. Over the past ~50 years, nutrient loading to the coastal zone has
42
substantially increased, resulting in symptoms such as persistent algal blooms and bottom
43
water hypoxia (i.e., water dissolved oxygen or DO < 2 mg L-1) 1, 4, 5. Located in a semi-
44
arid subtropical region, coastal embayments along the northwestern Gulf of Mexico
45
(nwGoM) are affected by climate change (i.e., long-term water temperature increase),
46
land use changes, increasing human freshwater demand, and eutrophication 6-8. One
47
consequence of these large-scale changes is bottom water hypoxia, which has been
48
observed in a number of estuaries in this region as far back as in 1988 6, 9-11. In some
49
instances, hypoxic conditions have led to fish kills 9 (unpubl. Texas Parks & Wildlife fish
50
kill report). Studies have also shown that hypoxia reduces benthic infauna abundance 10-
51
12
52
, thus elucidating the mechanisms that drive hypoxia formation is important. In general, coastal hypoxia is driven by a combination of warm water temperature,
53
high organic matter loading, and water column stratification 5, 13-15. However, despite the
54
well-documented increase in nutrient and organic matter loading and concomitant
55
increase in the prevalence of phytoplankton blooms in many coastal systems 1, 3, 5, 16, 17,
56
the source(s) of organic matter that fuels microbial respiration-induced DO consumption
57
is not always clear because of the diverse organic matter origins in these systems 18-20.
58
Such complexity hinders the understanding of hypoxia formation mechanisms and thus
59
prevents developing effective mitigation strategies.
60
In many estuaries, organic matter derived from in situ production is believed to be
61
the dominant carbon source that supports water column respiration. Consequently, efforts
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
4
Page 5 of 40
Environmental Science & Technology
62
have been put forth to control inorganic nutrient loading5, 21-27. However, most coastal
63
areas also receive significant allochthonous organic matter loading. Organic matter
64
derived from municipal wastewater discharge, manure-based agricultural operations, and
65
concentrated animal waste operations may be highly labile, and can be rapidly
66
remineralized once it enters the coastal water bodies 18, 19, 28-30.
67
In oceanographic and geochemical studies, stable nitrogen isotopic composition
68
(δ15N) of organic matter is an indicator of trophic levels and thus can be used to show
69
anthropogenic influences 31, 32. Meanwhile, stable carbon isotopic composition (δ13C) of
70
organic matter is often used to identify carbon sources 33-36. Given the complexity of
71
organic carbon sources and their differences in lability, an alternative approach to
72
identify the oxygen-consuming reactant is to use δ13C of the respiration produced CO2
73
(δ13Cacc) 25, 37-40.
74
In this study, we measured water column and surface sediment DO consumption
75
rates, determined δ13C of particulate organic carbon (δ13CPOC), dissolved organic carbon
76
(δ13CDOC), remineralized organic carbon (δ13COCx), as well as δ15N of particulate organic
77
nitrogen (δ15NPON) in two lagoonal estuaries that differ in watershed land use but both
78
experience seasonal hypoxia 6, 7. Finally, we discussed the organic carbon sources that
79
controlled DO consumption in these systems. This study represents an effort that meets
80
the need of understanding the drivers of hypoxia in coastal lagoons, which typically have
81
long water residence times and are highly susceptible to impacts from both human
82
activities in the watershed (land use change and nutrient loading) and climate change41, 42.
83
2. Method
84
2.1 Study area
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
5
Environmental Science & Technology
85
We examined two south Texas lagoonal estuaries in the nwGoM, Baffin Bay and
86
Oso Bay (Fig. 1). Both bays are undergoing eutrophication, as exemplified by a long-
87
term increase in nutrient and chlorophyll a (Chl a) concentrations and incidence of
88
episodic hypoxia 6, 7, 43. In addition, Baffin Bay has also experienced prolonged (multi-
89
year), dense blooms of the “brown tide” alga, Aureoumbra lagunensis 6, 44. Water
90
residence time in Baffin Bay is about one year and freshwater input is on average less
91
than evaporation, thus the water is often hypersaline 45. Oso Bay is a sub-embayment of
92
Corpus Christi Bay to the north and is influenced by rapid urbanization, and its
93
freshwater predominantly comes from wastewater treatment plants (a total of three) 7.
94
The average water depths in Baffin Bay and Oso Bay are ~ 2 m and 1 m, respectively.
95
2.2 Field sampling
96
Page 6 of 40
Water samples were collected at each station using a horizontal Van Dorn sampler
97
and dispensed into 1-L precombusted borosilicate glass bottles. Near surface water
98
(sampling depth 20-30 cm) was collected monthly (during 11/2014 - 09/2016 at nine
99
stations in Baffin Bay and during 08/2014 - 09/2016 at six stations in Oso Bay, Fig. 1) for
100
DO, Chl a concentration, stable isotope analysis of particulate and dissolved organic
101
matter. Both near surface water and bottom water (within 20-30 cm from the sediment-
102
water interface) for oxygen consumption incubations were also collected in Baffin Bay
103
(stations BB3 and BB6). Only surface water at Station Oso Ward was collected given the
104
shallow water depth (~1 m) (Fig. 1). Duplicate sediment cores (~20 cm) were collected at
105
these three stations for the sediment DO consumption incubation using a custom-made
106
corer following the design of Gardner and McCarthy 46.
107
2.3 Oxygen consumption incubation
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
6
Page 7 of 40
Environmental Science & Technology
108
Due to logistical constraints, fewer surface water incubations were carried out than
109
those using bottom waters for Baffin Bay. DO consumption rate (Kwater, unit in mmol O2
110
m-3 day-1) was measured in duplicate at in situ temperature in the dark for 24 hours using
111
250 mL pre-combusted BOD bottles under magnetic stirring. DO in the BOD bottle was
112
continuously monitored and recorded using calibrated YSITM ProODO optical oxygen
113
sensors every two minutes (Fig. S1). Assuming that the average water depths were 2 m in
114
Baffin Bay and 1 m in Oso Bay and that the water columns were well mixed, we
115
calculated the integrated water column DO consumption rates (mmol m-2 day-1) by
116
multiplying the Kwater in bottom water by the average water depths.
117
After all sediment cores were transported to the lab, all cores were allowed to settle
118
for at least 4 hours, then the overlying water was aerated using an air pump (about 30
119
mins) to make sure that DO saturation was close to 100% prior to incubations. Each core
120
tube was sealed at the top using a plastic plate without headspace (Fig. S1), which was
121
equipped with a motor that drove a suspended magnetic stir bar underneath and a port
122
that allowed insertion of a ProODO optical oxygen sensor. The cores were incubated at in
123
situ temperature in a circulating water bath. In both water and sediment incubations, DO
124
concentration decreased linearly with time, thus a simple linear regression was used to
125
calculate DO consumption rate 47. DO consumption rate at the sediment-water interface
126
was calculated based on the difference between the total DO consumption rate (Ktotal,
127
mmol O2 m-3 day-1) during sediment core incubation and that from water incubation only
128
(Kwater, mmol O2 m-3 day-1) following Eq. 1 (h is the thickness of the overlying water in
129
the incubating cores).
130
,
= (K
−K
)×h
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
(1)
7
Environmental Science & Technology
131
Page 8 of 40
An example of how the water and sediment DO consumption rate was calculated is
132
included in the Supplementary Information (Fig. S2, Table S1). Note that we did not
133
directly measure Kwater from November 2014 to June 2015 but used the averaged Kwater
134
for each bay during the entire study period for these months.
135
2.4 Organic carbon source incubation
136
Seasonal organic carbon source incubations from December 2014 to August 2016
137
were carried out using both water and sediment samples from stations BB3, BB6, and
138
Oso Ward. Briefly, the water was distributed into seven 40 ml FisherbrandTM borosilicate
139
glass EPA vials with Teflon-lined silicone septa without headspace. The vials were
140
incubated in the dark at room temperature (~22°C). Every other day, one vial was taken
141
to arrest the microbial process by injecting 100 μL saturated HgCl2, then the water
142
samples for stable isotope analysis (i.e., δ13C of dissolved inorganic carbon, or DIC) were
143
transferred into separate storage vessels. The δ13CDIC samples were stored in 2-ml
144
borosilicate autosampler vials (Restek®) with natural rubber septa lined open-top
145
aluminum caps. For sediment incubations, the surface 1-2 cm sediment was first
146
homogenized with bottom water, and then the sediment slurry was filled into seven 40 ml
147
EPA vials. One vial was sacrificed per day for water extraction, and the overlying water
148
was filtered through 0.45 μm sterile nylon disc filters into separate vials for DIC, δ13CDIC,
149
and calcium analyses. The DIC and Ca2+ samples were stored in 4-ml borosilicate vials,
150
which were tightly closed using phenolic screw caps with PTFE-faced rubber liner. All
151
samples were stored at 4°C until analysis, typically within 2 months of collection.
152 153
The δ13CDIC in the incubation samples were linearly related to the reciprocal of the DIC concentration ([DIC]-1), with the intercept of the regression representing the δ13C of
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
8
Page 9 of 40
Environmental Science & Technology
154
the accumulated DIC (δ13Cacc) during the incubation process 38, 39, 48. In sediment
155
incubations, δ13Cacc signal may include contributions from both the remineralized organic
156
carbon (δ13COCx) and carbonate dissolution (δ13CIC) (Eq. 2). Assuming all dissolved
157
carbonate was CaCO3, then the isotope mass balance in sediment incubations is:
158
δ C
159
The DIC increase due to carbonate dissolution was assumed to be the same as the
160
increase in calcium concentration ([Ca2+]) during the incubation. Then, fIC was calculated
161
as ratio of [Ca2+] increase and DIC concentration increase.
162
2.5 Analytical methods
= (1 − f ) × δ C
+f ×δ C
(2)
163
Field temperature, salinity, and DO were recorded using a pre-calibrated YSITM
164
Professional Plus multisonde. Chl a samples were collected and analyzed following the
165
protocol in Wetz et al. 7. DIC concentration was measured using infrared detection
166
following acid extraction on an Apollo® AS-C3 DIC analyzer with the analytical
167
precision of better than 0.1%. Certified reference material from Dr. A. Dickson's lab
168
(Scripps Institution of Oceanography) was used to calibrate the DIC analyzer. [Ca2+] was
169
determined using a Metrhom® automatic titrator in conjunction with a Ca2+ ion-selective
170
electrode for endpoint detection. The analytical precision was 0.2% 39. δ13CDIC was
171
determined on a Thermo Fisher Delta VTM isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS) with a
172
GasBench II preparation module for trace gas samples, and the analytical precision was
173
±0.1‰. Samples for δ13CPOC and δ15NPON analyses were collected by filtering water
174
samples through precombusted (at 450°C) 47-mm Whatman® GF/F filters. The filters
175
were then acidified using HCl fume for 4 hours to remove carbonate minerals. The
176
decarbonated filters were dried overnight at 65°C, and then were analyzed on a Thermo
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
9
Environmental Science & Technology
Page 10 of 40
177
FlashEA® 1112 elemental analyzer coupled IRMS 49. Isotopic values were calibrated
178
using chitin standards (Sigma Chemical), which were calibrated to a NIST stable isotope
179
(USGS 40) standard. The precision was ±0.1‰. The δ13CDOC of selected filtrates from the
180
previous step was obtained using the combination of an Aurora 1030C high temperature
181
catalytic conversion DOC analyzer, a molecular sieve trap and a continuous flow IRMS.
182
USGS 61 caffeine and USGS 62 caffeine were used as standards in the DOC analysis.
183
The precision of δ13CDOC analysis was ±0.2‰ 50.
184
3. Results
185
3.1. Temporal variations of salinity and temperature
186
Water temperature reflected clear seasonal patterns in both Baffin Bay and Oso Bay
187
(Fig. 2a). Higher temperatures (23.1°C - 30.2°C) were observed from April to October,
188
and lower temperature (12.8°C - 20.5°C), from November to March. Salinity in Baffin
189
Bay (Fig. 2b) was the highest (54.5) in August 2014. Afterwards, it decreased sharply
190
from February 2015 to June 2015, due to a series of strong flooding events. Salinity
191
increased from June to September, and stayed in a relatively narrow range (34.6±4.6)
192
from October 2015 to November 2016. In comparison, salinity in Oso Bay was generally
193
lower than that in Baffin Bay.
194
DO displayed a clear seasonal pattern that can be linked to temperature in both
195
Baffin Bay and Oso Bay, with lowest levels observed in the warmer months and highest
196
levels in cooler months (Fig. 2c&d). Relatively low oxygen (27°C, 48.6±18.3 mmol O2 m-2 day-1) than under cooler condition (