Paramagnetic shift reagents. Nature of the ... - ACS Publications

Cambridge CB2 1EW, United Kingdom. Received August 26, 1971. Abstract: Evidence is presented which indicates that in dry carbon tetrachloride solution...
0 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size
5325

Paramagnetic Shift Reagents. The Nature of the Interactions Jeremy K. M. Sanders, S. W. Hanson, and Dudley H. Williams*

Contribution from the University Chemical Laboratory, Cambridge CB2 IEW, United Kingdom. Received August 26, 1971 Abstract : Evidence is presented which indicates that in dry carbon tetrachloride solution Ln(DPM)3 samples may exist mostly in dimeric form. Theoretical analyses for adducts of various stoichiometries are given, and it is shown that data for Ln(DPM)3-inducedshifts are best explained by the formation of 1:1 substrate-shift reagent adducts. The analysis is extended to bifunctional compounds and substrate mixtures where the relative degree of coordination changes with shift reagent concentration ; these theoretical predictions have been confirmed by experimental observations. A fluorinated shift reagent, Eu(PTA)3, is described, with particular reference to its apparent ability to yield either 2 :1 or 1 :1 adducts, depending on the nature of the substrate and the relative concentrations of the reactants. The change in geometry associated with stoichiometry changes can lead to dramatic variations in the proton shift ratios of the substrate, and it is demonstrated that the shift reagent changes the magnitude of its magnetic anisotropy in this compound. Methods for the determination of equilibrium constants are given, and their physical significanceis discussed. Most polar substrates have apparent equilibrium constants of 1001000. The use of hydrated lanthanide nitrates in aqueous or polar solution as a new class of shift reagents for the functionality X-0- (where X is RCO, R3N+,R3P+or R3As+) is described, the major species in solution apparently being 2 :1 or 3 :1 adducts. Significant covalent character in this latter interaction is inferred from large contact contributions to 31P shifts. Examples are described where angular variable changes lead to reversals in the direction of the induced shift for both &lassesof shift reagent. All these results are combined to give a consistent picture of the nature of Ln(DPM)3adducts, and, somewhat less satisfactorily, of the nitrate adducts.

I

n the short time since the earliest announcements1v2 of the nmr shift properties of E U ( D P M ) ~ (l),some 80 reports of the properties and applications of 1 and other lanthanide analogs have appeared. Some of these reports have concentrated on improving our knowledge of the shift p0wers,~-7 while many have actually applied them to the solution of chemical probl e m ~ . * - ' ~The most important applications to date seem to be (i) the location of deuterium within a molecule,* (ii) determination of stereochemistry in small ring systems,9"0 (iii) configurations of oximes, l 1 (iv) structural determinations,12and (v) studies of the conformations of complexed substrate^.'^ In addition, there are potential uses of shift reagents in the assignment of 13C nmr spectra, l 4 and tris(3-pivaloyl-d-camphorato)eu(1) C. C. Hinckley,J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 91, 5160(1969). (2) J. K. M. Sanders and D. H. Williams, Chem. Commun., 422 (1970). (3) J. K. M. Sanders and D. H. Williams, J . Amer. Chem. Soc., 93, 641 (1971), and references therein. ( 4 ) K . K . Anderson and 3 . 3 . Uebel, TetrahedronLett., 5253 (1970). (5) C. Beaute, 2. W. Wolkowski, and N. Thoai, ibid., 817, 821 (1971). (6) L. Tomic, 2. Majerski, M. Tomic, and D. E. Sunko, Chem. Commun., 719 (1971). (7) C. C. Hinckley, M. R. Klotz, and F. Patil, J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 93,2417(1971). (8) C. P. Casey and C. R. Cyr, ibid., 93, 1280 (1971); E. Vedejs and M. F. Salomon, ibid., 92, 6965 (1970); I(. Tori, Y. Yoshimura, and R. Muneyaki, TetrahedronLett., 333 (1971). (9) J. R. Corfield and S. Trippett, Chem. Commun., 721 (1971); J. D. McKinny, L. H. Keith, A. Alford, and C. E. Fletcher, Can. J. Chem., 49, 1993 (1971); P. Belanger, C. Freppel, D. Tizane, and J.-C. Richer, ibid., 49, 1985 (1971); T. Okutani, A. Morimoto, T. Kakeno, and K. Masuda, TetrahedronLett., 1115 (1971); K. C. Yee and W. G. Bentrude, ibid., 2775 (1971); H.-D. Scharf and M.-H. Feilen, ibid., 2745 (1971); G. M. Whitesides and J. San Filippo, J . Amer. Chem. Soc., 92, 6611 (1970); L. J. Altmann, R. C. Kowerski, and H. C. Rilling, ibid., 93, 1782(1971). (10) M. R. Willcott, J. F. M. Oth, J. Thio, G. Plincke, and G. Schroder, TerrahedronLett., 1579 (1971). (11) 2. W. Wolkowski, ibid., 825(1971). (12) I