Partnerships in Chemical Research and Education - ACS Publications

discussion on BP's Extramural Research Award program as a means to complement and extend internal R&D programs through fundamental research. A...
0 downloads 0 Views 739KB Size
Chapter 9

University—Industry Research Partnerships A Corporate Perspective

Downloaded by NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV on November 5, 2012 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: November 18, 1992 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1992-0478.ch009

J. D. Burrington BP Research, Warrensville Research Center, Cleveland, OH 44128

In t h e p a s t t e n y e a r s , t h e r e has been a surge in t h e level o f i n d u s try-funded university r e s e a r c h , d r i v e n by b o t h t h e financial e n v i r o n ment and a renewed realization o f t h e synergistic m i s s i o n s o f b o t h enterprises. The n a t u r e and e x t e n t o f t h e benefits d e r i v e d will depend on t h e joint ability o f b o t h p a r t i e s t o r e c o g n i z e t h e i r r e s p e c t i v e e x p e c t a t i o n s and t o a d j u s t key parameters which d e f i n e t h e partn e r s h i p t o maximize t h e probability o f m e e t i n g e x p e c t a t i o n s . A c o r p o r a t e p e r s p e c t i v e on these i s s u e s and a description o f the major p r o gram t y p e s funded by BP in t h e U.S. will be p r e s e n t e d , i n c l u d i n g a d i s c u s s i o n on BP's E x t r a m u r a l R e s e a r c h Award program as a means t o complement and extend internal R&D programs through fundamental research.

A historical account o f U.S university-industry p a r t n e r s h i p s over the p a s t 70 y e a r s has been r e c e n t l y d i s c u s s e d (1.) and is summarized below. I n d u s t r y - f u n d e d u n i v e r s i t y r e s e a r c h o f t h e 1920's and 30's was domi n a t e d by f o u n d a t i o n p h i l a n t h r o p h y , d r i v e n by t h e attitude t h a t c o r p o r a t e funds s h o u l d be used solely to benefit mankind and t h a t t h e academic m i s s i o n must remain uncompromised by a n y t h i n g b u t a "strict" division between its r e s e a r c h f u n c t i o n and t h e industrial l a b o r a t o r y . The postwar y e a r s o f t h e 1940 s and 5 0 s saw a boom i n government f u n d i n g f o r r e s e a r c h . These f u n d s , however, began t o encourage c o r p o r a t e - u n i v e r s i t y a l l i a n c e s , w h i l e m a i n t a i n i n g a s e p a r a t e academic r e s e a r c h e n t i t y , a t r e n d which c o n t i n u e d i n t o t h e 7 0 s . f

f

T

0097-6156/92/0478-0087$06.00/0 © 1992 American Chemical Society

In Partnerships in Chemical Research and Education; McEvoy, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1992.

88

PARTNERSHIPS IN CHEMICAL RESEARCH AND EDUCATION

Downloaded by NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV on November 5, 2012 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: November 18, 1992 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1992-0478.ch009

In the p a s t 10 t o 15 y e a r s , a s i g n i f i c a n t i n c r e a s e , i n r e a l terms, i n i n d u s t r i a l f u n d i n g f o r u n i v e r s i t i e s has o c c u r r e d , n e a r l y t r e b l i n g from $330 MM i n 1977 t o $890 MM i n 1988, and more than d o u b l i n g as a p e r c e n t o f t o t a l u n i v e r s i t y r e s e a r c h over the p e r i o d , from 3% t o over 7% ( F i g u r e s l a and l b , b o t h f i g u r e s i n 1988 d o l l a r s ) . It i s t h i s l a t e s t surge i n f u n d i n g which has g e n e r a t e d the most i n t e r e s t i n the development o f u n i v e r s i t y - i n d u s t r y p a r t n e r s h i p s . The f a c t o r s s u r r o u n d i n g t h e s e new developments, t h e i r i m p l i c a t i o n s f o r f u t u r e R&D i n the U.S., and examples o f how u n i v e r s i t y r e s e a r c h programs a r e t a i l o r e d w i t h i n BP f o r mutual b e n e f i t a r e p r e s e n t e d below. Recent Trends The i n c r e a s i n g l e v e l of i n d u s t r y - s p o n s o r e d u n i v e r s i t y r e s e a r c h can be p a r t l y u n d e r s t o o d by the environment which has a m p l i f i e d i t s v a l u e to b o t h p a r t n e r s . I n d u s t r y has been under i n c r e a s i n g p r e s s u r e to r a t i o n a l i z e i t s r e s e a r c h and r e c o v e r c o s t s from i t s o p e r a t i n g u n i t s , r e s u l t i n g i n an i n t e n s i f i e d f o c u s o f i t s i n - h o u s e r e s o u r c e s on a p p l i e d R&D. U n i v e r s i t i e s , on the o t h e r hand, a r e f e e l i n g the e f f e c t s o f f e d e r a l d e f i c i t r e d u c t i o n s , which c r e a t e the need to seek a l t e r n a t e sources of funding. The r e s u l t i s t h a t i n d u s t r y i s now b e a r i n g a g r e a t e r p e r c e n t a g e o f t o t a l b a s i c r e s e a r c h f u n d i n g , i n c r e a s i n g from 14% i n 1977 to n e a r l y 20% i n 1989, an i n c r e a s e o f $1.5 b i l l i o n ( i n 1988 d o l l a r s , F i g u r e 2 ) . I n d u s t r i a l f u n d i n g t o u n i v e r s i t i e s as a p e r c e n t a g e o f b a s i c i n d u s t r i a l r e s e a r c h has a l s o i n c r e a s e d over t h i s p e r i o d from 19% to 27% ( T a b l e 1 ) . Thus, w h i l e u n i v e r s i t y r e s e a r c h i s s t i l l o n l y 4% o f i n d u s t r y ' s t o t a l R&D spend, i t i s becoming a more s i g n i f i c a n t p a r t of i t s b a s i c r e s e a r c h p o r t f o l i o . But a s i d e from the u n d e r l y i n g f i n a n c i a l environment, t h e r e i s a l s o a renewed r e c o g n i t i o n o f the complementary m i s s i o n o f academia and i n d u s t r y and o f the synergy t h a t can r e s u l t t h r o u g h c o l l a b o r a t i o n . The academic m i s s i o n and i n f r a s t r u c t u r e , which i s geared toward edu c a t i o n and fundamental c o n t r i b u t i o n s t o s c i e n c e and e n g i n e e r i n g , c r e a t e an environment and a c u l t u r e which i s h e a v i l y l e v e r a g e d by p u b l i c funds f o r the h i g h e s t q u a l i t y , c o s t - e f f e c t i v e b a s i c r e s e a r c h . I n d u s t r i a l p a r t i c i p a t i o n encourages development o f c u r r i c u l a and r e s e a r c h which a r e r e l e v a n t t o commerical a p p l i c a t i o n w h i l e s i m u l t a n e o u s l y p r o v i d i n g a p e r s p e c t i v e on the c r i t i c a l t e c h n i c a l c h a l l e n g e s i n i n d u s t r y and the need f o r i n t e r d i s c i p l i n a r y r e s e a r c h . The i n c r e a s i n g r e c o g n i t i o n , e s p e c i a l l y among academics, t h a t b o t h money and t e c h n i c a l i n t e r a c t i o n a r e c r i t i c a l t o s u c c e s s f u l c o l l a b o r a t i v e programs r e i n f o r c e s the importance f o r i n d u s t r y to e n t e r i n t o a p a r t n e r s h i p w i t h u n i v e r s i t i e s , and n o t m e r e l y f u n c t i o n as a f u n d i n g source. Tailoring

Programs

While these g e n e r a l b e n e f i t s a r e r e c o g n i z e d g l o b a l l y , the j u s t i f i c a t i o n f o r i n d i v i d u a l programs must be based on the s p e c i f i c e x p e c t -

In Partnerships in Chemical Research and Education; McEvoy, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1992.

9.

University-Industry Research Partnerships

BURRINGTON

$1988 Billions

Downloaded by NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV on November 5, 2012 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: November 18, 1992 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1992-0478.ch009

A

1958

1963

1968

1973

Industry:

1978

1983

$330 MM

ES

F«d«rol



StoU/Loeol

fZ2

Own Fundi

ISS

Othtr

1988

$890 MM

EBB Induttry

Β

CSS r*d«ral E223 Own Îundi

CZD SioU/Lecel fS3

EBB Indutlry

0th«r

Figure 1. Academic R & D expenditures by source. ^4,Total expenditure; B, Distribution. Source: " S c i e n c e , T e c h n o l o g y and t h e Academic E n t e r p r i s e : S t a t e s , Trends and I s s u e s " , The G o v e r n m e n t - U n i v e r s i t y - I n d u s t r y R e s e a r c h R o u n d t a b l e , N a t i o n a l Academy P r e s s , Washington, DC, O c t o b e r , 1989.

In Partnerships in Chemical Research and Education; McEvoy, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1992.

89

PARTNERSHIPS IN CHEMICAL RESEARCH AND EDUCATION

90

Downloaded by NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV on November 5, 2012 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: November 18, 1992 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1992-0478.ch009

$1988 Billions

1953

1959

1965

1971

1977

Industry: ÉS3 Federal fZ3

Β

1983

1989

$1.8B $3.3B

EEB Induifry

Acodemlc/StaU

EE3 CHh«r

Percent

100%

mm®®®**

100%

80%

60%

40%

20%

1953

1959

1965

Industry: federal ÉZ2 Acodémlc/Slofe

1971

1977 1

4

%

1983

1989

20%

EEE9 Indutfry Other

Figure 2. U.S. basic research expenditures. A, Total level; B, Distribution. Source: " S c i e n c e , T e c h n o l o g y and t h e Academic E n t e r p r i s e : S t a t e s , Trends and I s s u e s " , The G o v e r n m e n t - U n i v e r s i t y - I n d u s t r y R e s e a r c h R o u n d t a b l e , N a t i o n a l Academy P r e s s , Washington, DC, O c t o b e r , 1989.

In Partnerships in Chemical Research and Education; McEvoy, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1992.

9.

BURRINGTON

University-Industry Research Partnerships

91

Downloaded by NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV on November 5, 2012 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: November 18, 1992 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1992-0478.ch009

ations of each partner. The expected outcome and the nature of the research planned should be a r t i c u l a t e d early i n the discussions. These w i l l serve as the basis for mutual agreement and w i l l be c r i t i c a l i n defining the type of partnership and i t s key parameters, including assignment of i n t e l l e c t u a l property r i g h t s , i n d i r e c t costs, and mechanisms for interactions and measurement of r e s u l t s . An understanding or agreement can be derived on this basis to handle a range of expectations and research a c t i v i t i e s , as discussed below. Examples of types of university research which f a l l within general categories of the nature of research and the expected outcome, as shown i n Figure 3, w i l l serve as a framework for this discussion. Major Program Types Graduate fellowships are an excellent way for a university to enhance i t s c a p a b i l i t y for research and education without s a c r i f i c i n g any rights to freely publish results or to i n t e l l e c t u a l property and, i f the research i s fundamental and the sponsor i s not expecting any competitive technology, without overhead costs. However, these arrangements generaly involve smaller funding levels for limited periods, and can sometimes be lacking i n the sponsor's technical p a r t i c i p a t i o n and i t s a b i l i t y to provide s p e c i f i c applications. Contract research, on the other hand, involves applied research, a commercial outlet for the r e s u l t s , and a framework for strong sponsor i n t e r a c t i o n , since the sponsor i s expecting competitive technology to r e s u l t . However, i t may, i n some cases, be too focused to take f u l l advantage of the academic's expertise or to address s t r a t egic technical issues. While i t solves a s p e c i f i c technical problem for the sponsor, i t does not usually add to the technology base of the u n i v e r s i t y . A currently popular means of combining the favorable aspects of both of these above types i s the University Center Program concept. A prominent example of this i s the NSF Engineering Research Center Program, but many other smaller departmental i n t e r d i s c i p l i n a r y centers now e x i s t . These programs usually fund applied research for generation of generic technology, which can attract multiple sponsorship, and i n many cases i s matched by federal or state d o l l a r s . These centers have provided a means for industry to gain access to large interdepartmental resources, whose infrastructures and f a c i l i t i e s are leveraged by public funds. The centers also provide a means of monitoring technology and access to students with m u l t i d i s c i p l i n ary t r a i n i n g . However, exclusive sponsorship usually requires addi t i o n a l arrangements and funding and the cost and bureaucracy associated with the center's overhead can be s i g n i f i c a n t . BP's Extramural Research (EMRA) Program BP Research p r t i c i p a t e s i n a l l of these programs through i t s Univers i t y Liaison Office at the Warrensville Research Center near Cleveland, Ohio. However, we also recognize that gaps s t i l l e x i s t , p a r t -

In Partnerships in Chemical Research and Education; McEvoy, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1992.

92

PARTNERSHIPS IN CHEMICAL RESEARCH AND EDUCATION

Table I

Downloaded by NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV on November 5, 2012 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: November 18, 1992 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1992-0478.ch009

INDUSTRY-FUNDED UNIVERSITY RESEARCH

1977 2.7% 19%

As % of total industry research As % of basic industry research SOURCE:

1988 4% 27%

Reference!

Competitive

BP

Technology

Extramural

(proprietary)

Research

Research Expense Contract Research

(full overhead)

Award Funding

Expected Outcome

Unrestricted

Generic Technology (non-proprietary)

Fellowships, PYIs Other Grants

Research Centers (e.g., ERCs)

and/or Matched with Public Funds (no overhead)

Fundamental (knowledge seeking)

Applied (problem solving)

Nature of Research

Figure 3. Major types of University research partnerships and key parameters.

In Partnerships in Chemical Research and Education; McEvoy, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1992.

9.

BURRINGTON

University-Industry Research Partnerships

93

Downloaded by NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV on November 5, 2012 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: November 18, 1992 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1992-0478.ch009

i c u l a r l y i s s t r a t e g i c a r e a s where l o n g e r - t e r m b a s i c r e s e a r c h i s c r i t i c a l t o t h e g e n e r a t i o n o f c o m p e t i t i v e t e c h n o l o g y f o r one o r more of BP's b u s i n e s s e s . The EMRA program was d e s i g n e d t o p r o v i d e an i n t e g r a l component o f a r e s e a r c h base i n a r e a s o f s t r a t e g i c and business relevance. The EMRA program i s a p a r t n e r s h i p d e s i g n e d t o c a p t u r e t h e b e n e f i t s of academic freedom and commercial s i g n i f i c a n c e t o BP. While BP chooses t h e a r e a s where i t needs t o c o n c e n t r a t e , t h e EMRA p r i n c i p a l i n v e s t i g a t o r s a c t u a l l y w r i t e the p r o p o s a l s . In t h i s task, the academics a r e g i v e n t h e freedom t o pursue t h e approaches which w i l l take advantage o f t h e i r s t r e n g t h s i n a d v a n c i n g t h e s c i e n t i f i c unders t a n d i n g n e c e s s a r y t o overcome c r i t i c a l t e c h n i c a l b a r r i e r s which l i m i t t h e s t a t e o f t h e a r t . The r e s u l t i s t h e development o f s t r o n g c o n t a c t s which academics w o r k i n g i n a r e a s o f i n t e r e s t t o BP which enhance n o t o n l y t h e u n i v e r s i t y f u n d i n g base, b u t a l s o t h e awareness of t h e r e l e v a n c e o f i t s r e s e a r c h t o i n d u s t r y and o f i t s r e s e a r c h e r s to p r a c t i c a l , m u l t i d i s c i p l i n a r y problems. I n t u r n , these s t r o n g academic l i n k s p r o v i d e a key component o f B P s fundamental r e s e a r c h base and keep BP s c i e n t i s t s a t t h e " f r o n t i e r s " o f t h e i r d i s c i p l i n e . 1

The EMRA p r o p o s a l s a r e developed by a p r o c e d u r e i n which, a f t e r an i n t e r n a l review, s e l e c t e d p r o s p e c t i v e p r i n c i p a l i n v e s t i g a t o r s a r e asked t o p r o v i d e t h e i r p e r s p e c t i v e on how fundamental r e s e a r c h s h o u l d be advanced t o a d d r e s s a s i g n i f i c a n t t e c h n i c a l problem o f strategic significance. Thus, t h e EMRA n o t o n l y complements BP R e s e a r c h , b u t a l s o advances t h e r e s e a r c h g o a l s o f t h e p r i n c i p a l i n v e s t i g a t o r , and i s w r i t t e n by t h e p r i n c i p a l i n v e s t i g a t o r , w i t h g e n e r a l guidance on p o t e n t i a l a p p l i c a t i o n s . EMRA f u n d i n g i s i n t e n d e d t o c o v e r a t h r e e - y e a r at l e a s t one f u l l - t i m e r e s e a r c h e r , i n a d d i t i o n v e s t i g a t o r ' s time. The program r e c o g n i z e s t h e p u b l i s h and t o share i n t h e b e n e f i t s r e s u l t i n g e s t a b l i s h e s a mechanism f o r s t r o n g i n t e r a c t i o n the EMRA team and f o r r e v i e w o f r e s u l t s .

program and t o i n v o l v e to the p r i n c i p a l i n u n i v e r s i t y ' s need t o from EMRA's. I t a l s o o f BP s c i e n t i s t s w i t h

The program has been i n e f f e c t f o r about t e n y e a r s i n t h e U.K. I t was i n i t i a t e d l a s t y e a r i n t h e U.S. and has been r e c e i v e d w i t h e n t h u s i a s m by t h e academic community. A t t h e time o f t h i s w r i t i n g , 15 EMRA's have been p l a c e d i n t h e U.S. The EMRA concept p r o v i d e s a n o t h e r o p t i o n f o r u n i v e r s i t y - i n d u s t r y p a r t n e r s h i p s , where s p e c i f i c s t r a t e g i c t e c h n i c a l problems and where an a p p r o p r i a t e p r i n c i p a l i n v e s t i g a t o r and a r e l e v a n t a p p r o a c h t o a d v a n c i n g t h e u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f t h e u n d e r l y i n g phenomena c a n be i d e n t i fied. While BP i n America has t r a d i t i o n a l l y funded a l l t h e major types o f u n i v e r s i t y r e s e a r c h programs d i s c u s s e d above, t h e EMRA p r o gram has a l r e a d y become an i m p o r t a n t p a r t o f BP's U n i v e r s i t y R e s e a r c h p o r t f o l i o (Figure 4 ) .

In Partnerships in Chemical Research and Education; McEvoy, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1992.

Downloaded by NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV on November 5, 2012 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: November 18, 1992 | doi: 10.1021/bk-1992-0478.ch009

94

PARTNERSHIPS IN C H E M I C A L R E S E A R C H A N D E D U C A T I O N

Figure 4. BP-University liaison, 1990 U.S. program distribution. Prospects While the spectrum o f o p i n i o n on the t o p i c o f u n i v e r s i t y - i n d u s t r y p a r t n e r s h i p s i s b r o a d , most p a r t i c i p a n t s and o b s e r v e r s agree t h a t t h e r e i s v a l u e i n these new c o l l a b o r a t i o n s . However, t h e r e i s l i t t l e c o n c r e t e e v i d e n c e t h a t the enhanced a c t i v i t y over the p a s t ten y e a r s has c r e a t e d r e a l v a l u e , improved our c o m p e t i t i v e n e s s as a n a t i o n , o r g e n e r a t e d new j o b s . While t h e s e a r e the u l t i m a t e meas u r e s o f the p a r t n e r s i n v e s t m e n t s , i t i s s t i l l too e a r l y t o a p p l y the c r i t e r i a t o most programs. 1

As t h e s e programs mature, t h e s e q u e s t i o n s w i l l i n t e n s i f y and become more f r e q u e n t . We s h o u l d thus now be working t o ensure t h a t t h e a p p r o p r i a t e d a t a a r e c o l l e c t e d which w i l l comprise a d e f i n i t i v e case. F o r now, t h e s e p a r t n e r s h i p s c a n c e r t a i n l y be j u d g e d a s u c c e s s i n terms o f t h e i n c r e a s i n g number o f s t u d e n t s a b l e t o d e a l w i t h i n t e r d i s c i p l i n a r y problems, the enhanced t e c h n i c a l i n t e r a c t i o n s among academics and i n d u s t r i a l s c i e n t i s t s , the d i f f u s i n g o f i s s u e s s u r r o u n d i n g the " i n c o m p a t i b i l i t y " o f t h e i r r e s p e c t i v e c u l t u r e s , and t h e renewed awareness o f o u r i n t e r d e p e n d e n c e i n the p r o c e s s o f i n n o v a tion.

Literature Cited 1. New Alliances and Partnerships in American Science and Engineering; The Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable, National Academy Press: Washington, DC; 1986. 2. Science, Technology and the Academic Enterprise: Status, Trends and Issues; The Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable, National Academy Press: Washington, DC; October, 1989. RECEIVED June 6,1991

In Partnerships in Chemical Research and Education; McEvoy, J.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1992.