8 Past, Present, and Future Application of Paper and Thin-Layer Chromatography for Determining Pesticide Residues
Downloaded by TUFTS UNIV on October 2, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1971 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1971-0104.ch008
MELVIN
E. GETZ
Entomology Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Md. 20705
The past and present uses of paper and thin-layer tography fication
have been confined and semiquantitative
optical
scanning
techniques analysis
have endeavored
can be
tographic
uniform
application
tative
method
residue
The
in
precision
and
upon uniformity
spotting
of samples
of chromogenic
were undertaken
of analysis
Developments
and refinements
are dependent
new investigations
identiin
spotting
to show that these methods
quantitative.
layer, uniform
chroma-
to qualitative
estimation.
instrumentation
of this approach and
largely
would
of
and
reagents.
so an alternate be available
for
of
accuracy chromastandards, These quantipesticide
analysis.
* T p h e effect o n the e n v i r o n m e n t of pesticides a n d t h e i r residues has b e c o m e a g r o w i n g c o n c e r n of the scientific c o m m u n i t y a n d the g e n e r a l public ( J ) .
Pesticides e m b r a c e a l a r g e v a r i e t y of c h e m i c a l s , i n c l u d i n g
insecticides, f u n g i c i d e s , h e r b i c i d e s , r o d e n t i c i d e s , n e m a t o c i d e s , a n d m o l luscicides.
S i n c e these c o m p o u n d s
are toxic i n n a t u r e , m a n y countries
regulate t h e i r use b y l a w a n d specify h o w m u c h r e s i d u e c a n b e left i n a food product.
I n o r d e r to enforce s u c h r e g u l a t i o n s , s o p h i s t i c a t e d a n a -
l y t i c a l m e t h o d s h a v e h a d to b e d e v e l o p e d . I n a d d i t i o n to f o o d analysis, the e n v i r o n m e n t is m o n i t o r e d to m e a s u r e the degree of c o n t a m i n a t i o n that m i g h t b e c a u s e d b y the use of pesticides. T h e s e projects
e n t a i l s a m p l i n g of w i l d life, w a t e r sources, a n d soils.
W e a l t h y countries c a n u t i l i z e h i g h l y s o p h i s t i c a t e d a n d expensive e q u i p m e n t , s u c h as gas c h r o m a t o g r a p h y c o u p l e d w i t h mass s p e c t r o m e t r y , f o r r e s i d u e d e t e r m i n a t i o n a n d i d e n t i f i c a t i o n . H o w e v e r , since there is i n t e r 119
Biros; Pesticides Identification Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1971.
120
PESTICIDES
IDENTIFICATION
n a t i o n a l c o n c e r n a b o u t the use of p e s t i c i d e s , there is a n e e d f o r a r e l i a b l e a n a l y t i c a l m e t h o d t h a t is s i m p l e a n d i n e x p e n s i v e . P a p e r a n d t h i n - l a y e r c h r o m a t o g r a p h y are t w o s u c h a p p r o a c h e s .
The
t e c h n i q u e s are s i m p l e a n d r e q u i r e i n e x p e n s i v e e q u i p m e n t . I f one chooses the p r o p e r solvents, adsorbents, a n d c h r o m o g e n i c reagents, residues c a n b e i s o l a t e d o n a sheet of c h r o m a t o g r a p h i c p a p e r or a t h i n l a y e r of a d sorbent. T h e t y p e of r e s i d u e c a n t h e n b e d e t e r m i n e d b y c o m p a r i s o n w i t h reference s t a n d a r d s . T h e a p p l i c a t i o n s of these t e c h n i q u e s are r e v i e w e d i n this p a p e r . T h e a u t h o r s p e r s o n a l experiences are p r e s e n t e d w i t h a l o o k i n t o f u t u r e a p p l i Downloaded by TUFTS UNIV on October 2, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1971 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1971-0104.ch008
cations, i n p a r t i c u l a r , q u a n t i t a t i v e d e t e r m i n a t i o n s b y o p t i c a l s c a n n i n g methods.
Review Paper Chromatography.
T h e first i m p o r t a n t step for a n y p e s t i c i d e
r e s i d u e m e t h o d o l o g y is to extract the r e s i d u e f r o m the substrate a n d i s o late i t i n a p u r e e n o u g h state so that i t c a n b e i d e n t i f i e d a n d m e a s u r e d . T h i s p u r i f i c a t i o n step is c a l l e d " c l e a n - u p , " a n d there is a great q u a n t i t y of l i t e r a t u r e c o n c e r n i n g the different a p p r o a c h e s ( 2 , 3, 4, 5,
6).
O n c e the r e s i d u e has b e e n i s o l a t e d i n a f a i r l y p u r e state, i t c a n b e further resolved and identified b y chromatography.
Paper chromatog-
r a p h y , w h i c h w a s i n t r o d u c e d b y C o n s d e n et al. ( 7 ) i n 1944, w a s the first technique used.
I n i t i a l l y , i t w a s chiefly a n art, since i t d e p e n d e d
on
m a n i p u l a t i o n s of t h e i n d i v i d u a l investigators. B y 1957, s u p p l i e r s of c h r o m a t o g r a p h i c p a p e r s s t a r t e d to m a n u f a c t u r e a h i g h - q u a l i t y p r o d u c t .
It
w a s at this t i m e that M i t c h e l l ( 8 ) d e v e l o p e d p a p e r c h r o m a t o g r a p h y i n t o a s c i e n c e b y s e t t i n g u p a systematic a p p r o a c h for d e t e r m i n i n g o p t i m u m c o n d i t i o n s for r e s o l u t i o n a n d s e n s i t i v i t y . H i s w o r k w i t h i m m o b i l e — m o b i l e p h a s e c h r o m a t o g r a p h y ( 9 ) d e m o n s t r a t e d that p e s t i c i d e separations c o u l d b e o b t a i n e d w i t h a w i d e d e g r e e of r e s o l u t i o n a n d
flexibility.
O n e of the first l a b o r a t o r y groups to a p p l y p a p e r
chromatography
as a n i d e n t i f i c a t i o n a n d e s t i m a t i o n t e c h n i q u e was t h a t of M i i l l e r et (10).
I n 1957, at the C o n t r o l L a b o r a t o r y i n B a s e l , his g r o u p
al.
developed
a n e x t r a c t i o n a n d c l e a n - u p p r o c e d u r e f o r a f e w o r g a n o c h l o r i n e a n d org a n o p h o s p h o r u s insecticides a n d t h e n d e t e r m i n e d the q u a n t i t y of r e s i d u e w i t h reverse phase p a p e r c h r o m a t o g r a p h y .
Similar procedures were f o l -
l o w e d b y M c K i n l e y a n d M a h o n i n C a n a d a (11) States (12).
a n d M i l l s i n the U n i t e d
T h i s first series of p a p e r s t r i g g e r e d w i d e a p p l i c a t i o n s of
p a p e r m e t h o d s for r e s i d u e d e t e r m i n a t i o n s (13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21,
20,
22). T h i n - L a y e r Chromatography. A f e w years after the i n t r o d u c t i o n of
p a p e r c h r o m a t o g r a p h y , the p r i n c i p l e s of t h i n - l a y e r c h r o m a t o g r a p h y w e r e
Biros; Pesticides Identification Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1971.
8.
GETZ
Paper and Thin-Layer
121
Chromatography
demonstrated by M e i n h a r d and H a l l (23).
K i r c h e n e r et al. (24)
d u c e d t h e i n i t i a l t h i n - l a y e r c o a t i n g t e c h n i q u e s . S o l a et al. (25)
intro-
w e r e the
first g r o u p to s h o w t h a t insecticides c o u l d b e c h r o m a t o g r a p h e d b y this t e c h n i q u e , w i t h W a l k e r a n d B e r o z a (26)
presenting data obtained b y a
c o m p r e h e n s i v e c o v e r a g e of a l a r g e n u m b e r of solvents w i t h m a n y types of i n s e c t i c i d e s . T h e successful a p p l i c a t i o n of t h i n - l a y e r c h r o m a t o g r a p h y to determine multiple organochlorine
a n d organophosphorus
f o o d p r o d u c t s was a c c o m p l i s h e d b y K o v a c s (27,
residues i n
28).
E x c e l l e n t r e v i e w s of T L C t e c h n i q u e s as a p p l i e d to pesticides h a v e
Downloaded by TUFTS UNIV on October 2, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1971 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1971-0104.ch008
been written by C o n k i n (29)
and by Abbot and Thomson
(30).
Personal Techniques C l e a n - u p . C h a r c o a l is the f a v o r i t e a d s o r b e n t f o r the first steps i n t h e author's c l e a n - u p p r o c e d u r e s
(31,
32).
I t is a n excellent d e c o l o r i z i n g
agent a n d removes m u c h of the l a r g e - m o l e c u l e interferences.
W h e n it
was i n i t i a l l y u s e d , there was a p r o b l e m of r e p r o d u c i b i l i t y . H e a v y m e t a l cations, e s p e c i a l l y i r o n , w e r e c h e l a t i n g w i t h or t y i n g u p the insecticides
Figure 1. Paper chromatogram of different concentrations of a mixture of methyl parathion (A), Methyl Trithion (B), and carbophenothion (C); also, 1-gram aliquots of cleaned-up samples of control squash and wax beans Paper: Whatman #1 20- X 20-cm Immobile phase: 20% dimethylformamide Mobile phase: 2,2,4-trimethylpentane Chromogenic reagent: p-nitrobenzylpyridine
Biros; Pesticides Identification Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1971.
Downloaded by TUFTS UNIV on October 2, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1971 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1971-0104.ch008
122
PESTICIDES
Figure 2.
Paper chromatogram of 10 fig of carbophenothion its oxidative metabolites
IDENTIFICATION
(Trithion)
and
Paper: Whatman #3MM 20- X 20-cm Immobile phase: 10% soybean oil Mobile phase: 40% acetonitrile in distilled water Chromogenic reagent: silver nitrate-bromcresol green
so that n o n e or o n l y p a r t of t h e m w e r e b e i n g e l u t e d . A s i m p l e treatment w i t h h y d r o c h l o r i c a c i d t i e d u p the m e t a l ions a n d r e p r o d u c i b l e results w e r e o b t a i n e d t h e n f r o m the different w o o d charcoals.
Both column
e l u t i o n a n d b a t c h w i s e c l e a n - u p t e c h n i q u e s are u s e d . If there is a significant a m o u n t of o i l y m a t e r i a l left after the d e c o l o r i z i n g step, a second
t r e a t m e n t is necessary, i n v o l v i n g a s m a l l - v o l u m e
l i q u i d - l i q u i d partition (33).
T h i s a p p r o a c h has w o r k e d w e l l for o r g a n o -
chlorine and organophosphorus
insecticides.
S p o t t i n g . T h e present investigations of this l a b o r a t o r y are d i r e c t e d t o w a r d m a k i n g t h i n - l a y e r a n d p a p e r t e c h n i q u e s q u a n t i t a t i v e b y the use of o p t i c a l s c a n n i n g . I n p a r t i c u l a r , a p p l i c a t i o n s of the reflectance s c a n n i n g d e v i c e of B e r o z a et al. (34)
are b e i n g e x p l o r e d . V a r i a t i o n s i n the a p p l i -
c a t i o n of samples a n d standards to the c h r o m a t o g r a p h i c m e d i a h a v e a p r o n o u n c e d effect on the l i n e a r i t y of s t a n d a r d curves a n d d o not
give
good reproducibility. F o r q u a l i t a t i v e w o r k a n d the first q u a n t i t a t i v e s c a n n i n g t e c h n i q u e s , the s a m p l e w a s e v a p o r a t e d to dryness i n a c e n t r i f u g e t u b e a n d t h e n trans-
Biros; Pesticides Identification Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1971.
8.
GETZ
Paper and Thin-Layer
123
Chromatography
f e r r e d to the c h r o m a t o g r a m w i t h a s p o t t i n g p i p e t t e .
Several rinsings
w e r e p e r f o r m e d w i t h a v o l a t i l e solvent s u c h as ether or c h l o r o f o r m .
The
reference s t a n d a r d w a s u s u a l l y s p o t t e d w i t h a f e w fd of solvent. T h e
final
r e s u l t w a s a diffuse spot for the s a m p l e a n d a t i g h t spot for the s t a n d a r d . A f t e r d e v e l o p m e n t of t h e c h r o m a t o g r a m a n d v i s u a l i z a t i o n of the spots, i t w a s d i f f i c u l t to m a k e a n a c c u r a t e c o m p a r i s o n w i t h the s t a n d a r d . T h i s p r o b l e m is m i n i m i z e d b y the use of a n a u t o m a t i c spotter d e s i g n e d b y G e t z (35).
T h i s s p o t t i n g d e v i c e , a l l o w i n g c o m p l e t e c o n t r o l of
the i n i t i a l spot size of b o t h s a m p l e a n d s t a n d a r d b y the a p p r o p r i a t e c h o i c e of solvents a n d a i r flow, is a n i m p r o v e m e n t over a n e a r l i e r d e s i g n
Downloaded by TUFTS UNIV on October 2, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1971 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1971-0104.ch008
b y B e r o z a et al.
(6).
C h r o m a t o g r a p h i c M e d i a a n d S o l v e n t Systems. # 3 M M 20- X
Whatman # 1
and
2 0 - c m papers are u s e d for p a p e r c h r o m a t o g r a p h y .
The
reverse phases of M i t c h e l l ( 9 )
g i v e excellent results for the o r g a n o c h l o -
rine and parent organophosphorus G e t z (36)
insecticides.
T h e reverse phases
of
successfully resolve the o x i d a t i v e m e t a b o l i t e s of the o r g a n o -
Figure 3. Thin-layer chromatogram of different concentrations of a mixture of methyl parathion (A), Methyl Trithion (B), and carbophenothion (C); also, 1-gram aliquots of cleaned-up samples of control squash and wax beans Plate: Brinkman prepared silica gel, 250 my Solvent: 70% 2,2,4-trimethylpentane, 25% acetone, 5% Chromogenic reagent: p-nitrobenzylpyridine
chloroform
Biros; Pesticides Identification Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1971.
Downloaded by TUFTS UNIV on October 2, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1971 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1971-0104.ch008
124
PESTICIDES
Figure
4.
Thin-layer
IDENTIFICATION
chromatogram of actual organochlorine nursery soils
residues in
Plate: Eastman silica gel sheet Solvent: 90% 2,2,4-trimethylpentane, 10% methylene chloride Chromogenic reagent: silver nitrate-phenoxyethanol
p h o s p h o r u s i n s e c t i c i d e s . F i g u r e 1 represents some o r g a n o p h o s p h o r u s i n secticides c h r o m a t o g r a p h e d w i t h a n o n a q u e o u s m o b i l e phase, a n d F i g u r e 2 represents the o x i d a t i v e m e t a b o l i t e s of
carbophenothion
chromato-
g r a p h e d b y a n aqueous system. S i l i c a g e l , a l u m i n a , F l o r i s i l , cellulose, a n d p o r o u s glass are u s e d for p r e p a r i n g 20- X 2 0 - c m glass plates. C a l c i u m sulfate, c o l l o i d a l s i l i c a , a n d c o l l o i d a l a l u m i n a are u s e d as b i n d e r s . C o m m e r c i a l l y - p r e p a r e d plates also h a v e b e e n used. T h e solvent systems a n d adsorbents i n v e s t i g a t e d b y G e t z a n d W h e e l e r ( 3 7 ) are u s e d for i d e n t i f y i n g o r g a n o p h o s p h o r u s insecticides. T h e o r g a n o c h l o r i n e insecticides are r e s o l v e d b y a l u m i n a a n d s i l i c a g e l , u s i n g the solvent systems of K o v a c s ( 2 7 ) , W a l k e r a n d B e r o z a ( 2 6 ) , a n d B e r o z a et al
(38).
F i g u r e 3 shows s e p a r a t i o n of some o r g a n o p h o s p h o r u s insecticides b y t h i n - l a y e r c h r o m a t o g r a p h y , a n d F i g u r e 4 shows a c h r o m a t o g r a m of some o r g a n o c h l o r i n e insecticides i n s o i l extracts. D e v e l o p m e n t is c a r r i e d o u t i n tanks w i t h o u t liners, for
experience
has s h o w n t h a t the shape of the spot is m o r e s y m m e t r i c a l i f there is n o l i n e r present, e s p e c i a l l y w h e n b i n a r y or t e r n a r y solvent systems are used. Chromogenic Reagents.
I n o r d e r to d e t e r m i n e the R values of p u r e f
insecticides, a n y t y p e of reagent m a y b e u s e d to v i s u a l i z e the m i g r a t e d spot.
B u t w h e n this reagent is u s e d for a c t u a l r e s i d u e d e t e r m i n a t i o n s ,
t h e r e m a y b e n o n r e s i d u e spots f o r m e d b y extractives f r o m the substrate. T h e r e f o r e , i t is d e s i r a b l e t h a t the c h r o m o g e n i c reagents b e as selective as possible.
Biros; Pesticides Identification Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1971.
8.
GETZ
Paper and Thin-Layer
125
Chromatography
F o r d e t e c t i n g t h e p r e s e n c e o f o r g a n o c h l o r i n e c o m p o u n d s , a n acetone s o l u t i o n o f silver n i t r a t e is u s e d as a s p r a y reagent ( 8 ) . S i l v e r n i t r a t e also c a n b e i n c o r p o r a t e d into t h e t h i n - l a y e r m a t e r i a l (39)
a n d seems to
g i v e better results. H o w e v e r , t h e t h i n - l a y e r m e d i a m u s t h a v e a l o w c h l o r i n e c o n t e n t o r else t h e b a c k g r o u n d m a y t u r n b r o w n o r gray. T h e spots
Downloaded by TUFTS UNIV on October 2, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1971 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1971-0104.ch008
A
Figure 5. Scan of five different concentrations of an organophosphorus insecticide mixture: (A) dimethoate, (B) mevinphos, (C) Dasanit, (D) malathion, (E) carbophenothion Plate: Quanta prepared silica gel, high abrasion resistance Solvent: 70% 2,2,4-trimethylpentane, 25% acetone, 5% chloroform Chromogenic reagent: p-nitrobenzylpyridine
Biros; Pesticides Identification Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1971.
Downloaded by TUFTS UNIV on October 2, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1971 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1971-0104.ch008
126
PESTICIDES
10 Figure 6.
2.0
3.0
4.0
SO
6.0
IDENTIFICATION
70
AJ1
80
Standard curves obtained from (A) dimethoate, (B) mevinphos, (C) Dasanit in the concentration range of 0.5 to 8.0 fig
are d e v e l o p e d b y e x p o s i n g the c h r o m a t o g r a m to h i g h - i n t e n s i t y U V l i g h t . T h e colors v a r y f r o m b r o w n to p u r p l i s h - b l a c k . S e v e r a l reagents are u s e d for the o r g a n o p h o s p h o r u s insecticides. A n acetone s o l u t i o n of s i l v e r n i t r a t e a n d b r o m c r e s o l g r e e n ( o r b r o m p h e n o l b l u e ) (31, 3 2 ) is s p r a y e d onto the c h r o m a t o g r a m . T h e spots are v i s u a l i z e d b y s p r a y i n g w i t h a 0 . 0 1 % c i t r i c a c i d s o l u t i o n or a p H 4.0 citrate buffer s o l u t i o n . T h i s reagent reacts o n l y w i t h the t h i o p h o s p h o r y l c o n figurations
to g i v e b l u e or m a g e n t a spots.
Treatment w i t h p-nitrobenzylpyridine a n d tetraethylenepentamine visualizes a l l the o r g a n o p h o s p h o r u s insecticides as b l u e or m a g e n t a spots (40). S e r u m cholinesterase w i t h b r o m t h y m o l b l u e i n d i c a t o r a n d a c e t y l c h o l i n e as a substrate detects the c h o l i n e s t e r a s e - i n h i b i t i n g insecticides P o s s i b l e interferences w i t h the s i l v e r n i t r a t e c h r o m o g e n i c are s u l f u r c o m p o u n d s
(36).
reagent
w h i c h w o u l d g i v e a b r o w n spot a n d r e d u c i n g
g r o u p s o n m o l e c u l e s w h i c h m i g h t p r o d u c e a spot. T o date, no c o m p o u n d s other t h a n o r g a n o t h i o p h o s p h a t e s g i v e a b l u e or m a g e n t a spot w i t h the s i l v e r n i t r a t e - d y e reagent.
Sulfur
compounds
w i l l react w i t h the silver n i t r a t e to g i v e b r o w n spots, a n d artifacts w i t h a c i d characteristics h a v i n g R / s s i m i l a r to the insecticides w o u l d p r e v e n t the color f o r m a t i o n .
Biros; Pesticides Identification Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1971.
8.
GETZ
Paper and Thin-Layer
The
127
Chromatography
p - n i t r o b e n z y l p y r i d i n e w i l l react w i t h epoxides, lactones, o t h e r
a l k y l a t i n g - t y p e c o m p o u n d s , a n d h e r b i c i d e s s u c h as a t r a z i n e . I t w i l l also g i v e a c o l o r r e a c t i o n w i t h o r g a n o c h l o r i n e insecticides t h a t h a v e a n e p o x y group.
Quantitative Chromatography T h e r e h a v e b e e n m a n y attempts at q u a n t i t a t i n g p a p e r a n d t h i n - l a y e r c h r o m a t o g r a m s (41),
b u t the s i m p l e s t a p p r o a c h appears to b e o p t i c a l
d e n s i t y measurements of the m i g r a t e d spots.
M a n y excellent s c a n n i n g
Downloaded by TUFTS UNIV on October 2, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1971 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1971-0104.ch008
devices are n o w o n the m a r k e t . T h e y are precise o p t i c a l i n s t r u m e n t s c a p a b l e of great a c c u r a c y w h e r e the o p t i c a l measurements are c o n c e r n e d . T h e one u s e d i n this l a b o r a t o r y is t h e reflectance scanner of B e r o z a et al. w h i c h uses d o u b l e - b e a m fiber optics.
(34)
H o w e v e r , there are other m a n i p u l a t i o n s p e r f o r m e d f o r c h r o m a t o g r a p h y t h a t affect the p r e c i s i o n a n d a c c u r a c y of the final result. A s m e n t i o n e d p r e v i o u s l y , the s p o t t i n g t e c h n i q u e v a r i a t i o n was m i n i m i z e d b y t h e use of a n a u t o m a t i c spotter (35)
w h i c h spots s a m p l e a n d s t a n d a r d u n d e r
s i m i l a r p a r a m e t e r s , a n d the size of the i n i t i a l spots are a d j u s t e d so t h a t the E i n s t e i n - S m o l u c h o w s k y effect is m i n i m i z e d (42),
allowing a range
of concentrations f r o m the m i n i m u m d e t e c t a b l e to 20 fig.
30 IS
20 IS 10
A43.
Figure 7.
10
2.0
30
4.0
SO
6.0
70
80
Standard curves obtained from (D) malathion and (E) carbophenothion in the concentration range of 0.5 to 8.0 /tg
Biros; Pesticides Identification Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1971.
Downloaded by TUFTS UNIV on October 2, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1971 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1971-0104.ch008
128
PESTICIDES
IDENTIFICATION
Figure 8. A reflectance scan of 10-fig mixture of three organophosphorus insecticides resolved with paper chromatography Paper: Whatman #1 20- X 20-cm Immobile phase: 20% dimethylformamide Mobile phase: 2,2,4-trimethylpentane Chromogenic reagent: p-nitrobenzylpyridine
W i t h the s p o t t i n g t e c h n i q u e o p t i m i z e d , the r e p r o d u c i b i l i t y p r e c i s i o n w a s a l m o s t e n t i r e l y d e p e n d e n t u p o n the u n i f o r m i t y of the
chromato-
g r a p h i c l a y e r . M o s t plates h a d t h i c k edges so that samples or standards s p o t t e d n e a r the e d g e c o u l d not b e i n c l u d e d i n the q u a n t i t a t i v e c a l c u l a tions. O n e b r a n d of c o m m e r c i a l p l a t e p r e p a r e d b y s p r a y i n g t e c h n i q u e s gave the best u n i f o r m i t y f r o m e d g e to edge, a n d w h e n s t a n d a r d curves w e r e p r e p a r e d u s i n g the w h o l e p l a t e , v e r y s m o o t h curves w e r e o b t a i n e d . T h e other c o m m e r c i a l plates u s e d gave g o o d results w h e n the center w a s u s e d for f o u r samples or standards. T h e a b r a s i v e resistance of the plates h a v e to be better t h a n those u s e d for q u a l i t a t i v e w o r k , a n d the c h r o m o g e n i c reagents h a v e to b e a p p l i e d b y d i p p i n g or i n c o r p o r a t i n g i n t o the t h i n l a y e r to p r e v e n t d a m a g e to the surface a n d u n e v e n s p o t t i n g of the b a c k g r o u n d area. F i g u r e 5 shows the scans o b t a i n e d f r o m different concentrations of a m i x t u r e of five o r g a n o p h o s p h o r u s c o m p o u n d s :
dimethoate ( A ) , m e v i n -
Biros; Pesticides Identification Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1971.
8.
GETZ
Paper and Thin-Layer
129
Chromatography
phos ( B ) , Dasanit ( C ) , malathion ( D ) , a n d carbophenothion ( E ) . ures 6 a n d 7 s h o w the s t a n d a r d curves o b t a i n e d f r o m these scans
Figby
p l o t t i n g the areas of the curves vs. c o n c e n t r a t i o n . F i g u r e 8 is a scan of the 10-/*g m i x t u r e of m e t h y l p a r a t h i o n , M e t h y l T r i t h i o n , a n d c a r b o p h e n o t h i o n s h o w n i n F i g u r e 1. F i g u r e 9 c o m p a r e s the s t a n d a r d curves o b t a i n e d f r o m v a r i o u s c o n centrations of d i a z i n o n at t w o different a t t e n u a t i o n settings. T h e a t t e n u a t o r response is l i n e a r b u t the reflectance scan does n o t r e s p o n d l i n e a r l y (5).
Downloaded by TUFTS UNIV on October 2, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1971 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1971-0104.ch008
Future Prospects A s w e c o m p a r e p a p e r w i t h t h i n - l a y e r c h r o m a t o g r a p h y , w e c a n see t h a t p a p e r sheets as s u c h p r o b a b l y w i l l b e s u p p l a n t e d b y t h i n - l a y e r c e l l u l o s e m e d i a . T h i s means that the same i m m o b i l e - m o b i l e systems t h a t are a p p l i e d to p a p e r c a n also b e u s e d for c e l l u l o s e t h i n l a y e r . T h e i n o r g a n i c adsorbents d o n o t a p p e a r to b e v e r y efficient f o r r e s o l v i n g h i g h l y polar compounds.
W h e n t h e y are i m p r e g n a t e d w i t h i m m o b i l e phases,
ascension times are i n c r e a s e d g r e a t l y because the c a p i l l a r i e s are b e i n g
I CM
b IAll NO N
SO
40-
30-
20 V5/2
/0MS.
2.0
Figure 9.
4 T
A comparison
60
80
10
12
14
of standard curves obtained from diazinon at two different attenuation levels
Biros; Pesticides Identification Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1971.
130 filled
PESTICIDES
IDENTIFICATION
w i t h a l i q u i d , a n d l i q u i d - l i q u i d p a r t i t i o n i n g is also t a k i n g p l a c e .
I n some instances, t h e ascension times are too l o n g f o r p r a c t i c a l purposes. W i t h t h i n - l a y e r cellulose, w e c a n u t i l i z e t h e separations p r o d u c e d b y i m m o b i l e - m o b i l e phases w i t h better r e s o l u t i o n because
t h e spots p r o -
d u c e d a r e m o r e c o m p a c t t h a n that o b t a i n a b l e f r o m p a p e r . A n y m a t e r i a l w i t h a c a p i l l a r y s t r u c t u r e that c a n b e m a d e to a d h e r e as a l a y e r c a n b e u s e d f o r t h i n - l a y e r c h r o m a t o g r a p h y .
Quantitative de-
t e r m i n a t i o n s b y this t e c h n i q u e are b o u n d to increase as m o r e a n d m o r e laboratories o b t a i n s c a n n i n g e q u i p m e n t . companies
T h i s w i l l g i v e i m p e t u s to t h e
w h o m a k e c o m m e r c i a l l y - p r e p a r e d plates to p r o d u c e
them
Downloaded by TUFTS UNIV on October 2, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1971 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1971-0104.ch008
w i t h m o r e care a n d u n i f o r m i t y .
Literature Cited (1) Mrak, E . M., U . S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, "Report on the Secretary's Commission on Pesticides and their Relationship to Environmental Health," Parts I and I I , 1969. (2) Morley, H . V., Residue Rev. (1966) 16, 1. (3) Samuel, B. L . , Hodges, H . K., Residue Rev. (1967) 17, 45. (4) Thornburg, W . W . , "Analytical Methods for Pesticides, Plant Growth Regulators and Food Additives," Vol. I, p. 87-108, Academic, New York, 1963. (5) Biros, F . , Burke, J. A . , Gaul, J. A . , Corneliussen, P. E., "Pesticide Analytical Manual, Vol. I, Ch. 4, 5, 6, U . S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Food and Drug Administration. (6) Duggan, R. E., Barry, H . C., Johnson, L . Y., Williams, S., "Pesticide Analytical Manual, Vol. I I , U . S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Food and Drug Administration. (7) Consden, R., Gordon, A. H . , Martin, J. P., Biochem. J. (1944) 38, 224. (8) Mitchell, L . C., J. Assoc. Offic. Agr. Chemists (1957) 40, 999. (9) Mitchell, L . C., J. Assoc. Offic. Agr. Chemists (1958) 41, 781. (10) Müller, R., Ernst, G., Schock, H . , Mitt. Gebiete Lebensm. Hyg. (1957) 48, 152. (11) McKinley, W . P., Mahon, J. H . , J. Assoc. Offic. Agr. Chemists (1959) 42, 725. (12) Mills, P., J. Assoc. Offic. Agr. Chemists (1959) 42, 734. (13) Bates, J. A., Jr., Analyst (1965) 90, 453. (14) Evans, W . H . , Analyst (1962) 87, 569. (15) Getz, M . E., Residue Rev. (1963) 2, 9. (16) Major, A., Jr., Barry, H . C., J. Assoc. Offic. Agr. Chemists (1961) 44, 202. (17) Major, A., Jr.,J.Assoc. Offic. Agr. Chemists (1962) 45, 387. (18) Rusiecki, W . , Henneberg, M . , Turkowska, T., Biul. Inst. Ochrony Roslin (1965) 32, 23. (19) Storherr, R. W., Tighe, J. F . , Sykes, J. F . ,J.Assoc. Offic. Agr. Chemists (1960) 43, 731. (20) Storherr, R. W., Onley, J.,J.Assoc. Offic. Agr. Chemists (1962) 45, 382. (21) Yip,G.,J.Assoc. Offic. Agr. Chemists (1962) 45, 367. (22) Zweig, G., Archer, T . E., J. Agr. Food Chem. (1958) 6, 910. (23) Meinhard, J. E., Hall, N . J., Anal. Chem. (1949) 21, 185. (24) Kirchener, J. G., Heller, G. J., Anal. Chem. (1951) 23, 420. (25) Sola, T . , Salimenen, K., Fiskari, K., Z. Lebensm. Untersuch. Forsch. (1962) 117, 369.
Biros; Pesticides Identification Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1971.
8. (26) (27) (28) (29) (30) (31) (32) (33)
Downloaded by TUFTS UNIV on October 2, 2016 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1971 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1971-0104.ch008
(34) (35) (36) (37) (38) (39) (40) (41) (42)
GETZ
Paper and Thin-Layer
Chromatography
131
W a l k e r , K . C., Beroza, M., J. Assoc. Offic. Agr. Chemists (1963) 46, 250. Kovacs, M. J., Jr., J. Assoc. Offic. Agr. Chemists (1963) 46, 884. Kovacs, M. J., Jr., J. Assoc. Offic. Agr. Chemists (1964) 47, 1097. C o n k i n , R., Residue Rev. (1964) 6, 136. Abbot, D . C., Thomson, J., Residue Rev. (1965) 11, 1. Getz, M. E., J. Assoc. Offic. Agr. Chemists (1962) 4 5 , 393. Storherr, R. W . , Getz, M. E., Watts, R. R., F r i e d m a n , S. J., E r w i n , F . , Giuffrida, L., Ives, F . , J. Assoc. Offic. Agr. Chemists (1964) 47, 1087. Beck, E . W . , Johnson, J . C., J r . , Getz, M. E., Skinner, F. B . , Dawsey, L . H., W o o d h a m , D . W . , Derbyshire, J. C., J. Econ. Entomol. (1968) 6 1 , 605. Beroza, M., Hill, K . R., Norris, K . , Anal. Chem. (1968) 40, 1608. Getz, M. E., "An Automatic Spotter for Quantitative TLC Analysis by Optical Scanning," Meeting of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D . C., October 1970. Getz, M. E., Friedman, S. J., J. Assoc. Offic. Agr. Chemists (1963) 46, 707. Getz, M. E., Wheeler, H . G., J. Assoc. Offic. Anal. Chemists (1968) 5 1 , 1101. Beroza, M., Getz, M. E., Collier, C . W . , Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. (1968) 3, 18. Adams, H. R., Schechter, M. S., Meeting of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, 77th, Washington, D . C., October 14-17, 1963. Watts, R. R., J. Assoc. Offic. Agr. Chemists (1963) 46, 707. Shellard, E . J., Ed., "Quantitative Paper and T h i n L a y e r Chromatography," p. 1-133, Academic, N e w York, 1968. Giddings, J. C., J. Chromatog. (1959) 2, 48.
RECEIVED July 6, 1970. Mention of proprietary products is for identification only and does not i m p l y endorsement of these products by the U. S. Department of Agriculture.
Biros; Pesticides Identification Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1971.