Peptoids and Polypeptoids at the Frontier of Supra - ACS Publications

Review pubs.acs.org/CR

Peptoids and Polypeptoids at the Frontier of Supra- and Macromolecular Engineering Niklas Gangloff,† Juliane Ulbricht,†,§ Thomas Lorson,†,§ Helmut Schlaad,‡ and Robert Luxenhofer*,† †

Functional Polymer Materials, Chair for Chemical Technology of Materials Synthesis, University of Würzburg, Röntgenring 11, 97070 Würzburg, Germany ‡ Institute of Chemistry, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476 Potsdam, Germany 3.2.4. Computational Modeling 3.3. Mimicking Tertiary Structures 3.3.1. Globular Structures 3.3.2. Multihelical Bundles 3.4. Mimicking Quaternary Structures 3.4.1. Peptoid Nanosheets 3.4.2. Peptoid Superhelices 3.4.3. Nanotubes and Round-Bottom Flasks 3.4.4. Amylin-Like Structures, Microspheres, and Worm-Like Micelles 4. Applications of (Poly)peptoids 4.1. (Poly)peptoids as Biomaterials 4.1.1. Biocompatibility and Degradability 4.1.2. Drug Delivery 4.1.3. Pharmacologically Active (Poly)peptoids 4.1.4. Nonfouling Surface Coatings 4.2. Energy Materials 4.3. Crystallization Modifiers 4.3.1. Kinetic Hydrate Inhibitors 4.3.2. Antifreeze Agents 4.3.3. Controlling Biomineralization 4.4. Chromatography Materials 4.5. Phase Transfer Catalyst and Ion Binding Peptoids 5. Summary and Outlook: The Frontier Author Information Corresponding Author Author Contributions Notes Biographies Acknowledgments References

CONTENTS 1. Introduction and Historical Perspective 2. Synthesis and Characterization of (Poly)peptoids 2.1. Ring-Opening Polymerization 2.1.1. Side Chain Variations 2.1.2. Polymerization Kinetics 2.1.3. Polymerization of N-Thiocarboxyanhydrides 2.1.4. Copolymerization of N-Carboxyanhydrides 2.1.5. (Poly)(β-peptoid)s and (Poly)(γ-peptoid)s 2.2. Solid-Phase Syntheses toward Highly Defined (Poly)peptoids 2.2.1. Stepwise Synthesis from Solid Supports 2.2.2. Ring-Opening Polymerization from Solid Supports 2.2.3. Combinatorial Libraries for Peptoid Ligand Screening 2.3. Ribosomal Synthesis 2.4. Macromolecular Engineering 2.4.1. Cyclic (Poly)peptoids 2.4.2. Branched Polypeptoids and Polypeptoid Brushes 2.4.3. Polymer-Analogue Modification of (Poly)peptoids 2.5. Physico-Chemical Characteristics of Polypeptoids 2.5.1. Properties in Solution 2.5.2. Bulk Properties 3. Intramolecular and Intermolecular Assembly of (Poly)peptoids 3.1. Controlling and Modifying the Primary Structure 3.2. Mimicking Secondary Structures 3.2.1. Controlling cis/trans-Conformation 3.2.2. Helices: Multifaceted Structural Elements 3.2.3. Sheet, Ribbon, Turn, and Loop

© 2015 American Chemical Society

1753 1755 1755 1756 1756 1757 1757 1757 1758 1758 1759 1759 1760 1761 1761 1762 1765

1777 1777 1779 1779 1779 1779 1780 1780 1780 1781 1781 1781 1784 1785 1786 1786 1788 1788 1788 1789 1789 1789 1790 1791 1791 1791 1791 1791 1792 1792

1. INTRODUCTION AND HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE In most general terms, polymers and their supramolecular assemblies have been defining life on this planet since its conception. Polymers of nucleic acids carry the code of life and polymers of carbohydrates are probably the most common (per mass) macromolecules on the planet and give macroscopic structure to flora and fauna. Finally, polymers of amino acids translate the genetic code into function.

1766 1766 1768 1770 1770 1771 1771

Special Issue: Frontiers in Macromolecular and Supramolecular Science

1773 1775

Received: May 1, 2015 Published: December 23, 2015 1753

DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00201 Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 1753−1802

Chemical Reviews

Review

noted the formation of an “insoluble body” after treating glycine-NCA with water and alcohol and correctly analyzed the products as anhydrides of glycine.19 He also reported the first N-substituted glycine-NCA (NNCA), N-phenylglycine-NCA.20 A year later, Leuchs termed the product of hydrolysis of NCAs as polymers.21 However, as Staudinger noted in 1920, the terminology with respect to polymers was not “homogenous” at that time.24 In 1922, Fuchs reported that he discovered an even simpler method to prepare NCAs already in 1910.25 Actually, in this report, Fuchs describes the synthesis of N-phenylglycineNCA and p-tolylglycine-NCA out of alkaline aqueous solution. Fuchs did not hint at the preparation of the corresponding polymers. Curtius states polymeric anhydrides as products of the reaction of NCAs (which Curtius termed isatoic acid anhydrides, or in German “isatosäure-anhydrid”) with aniline and that these were already described by Leuchs.26 Interestingly, Curtius described in a series of papers the synthesis of NCAs via Curtius rearrangement form potassium salts of malonic acids.26−28 The actual isatoic acid anhydride described by Curtius was the first example of a 1,3-oxazinane-2,6-dione derivative, otherwise termed β-amino acid-NCA.27 Wessely and co-workers published a series of papers on reactions of NCAs and NNCAs between 1925 and 1955. It was also noted that amorphous high molecular products were obtained by reaction with aniline. The structures used by Curtius and Wessely to describe the products suggest from a modern perspective that the nature of this polymer was not fully understood at that time (Scheme 1).

The structure of proteins and glycoproteins has served as a blueprint for macromolecular engineering and supramolecular chemistry for many years. Important contributions to the structure of proteins are hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions. At the same time, these contributions are, under unfavorable circumstances, responsible for misfolding and denaturation of proteins, for example, on surfaces or interfaces. This is typically associated with loss of function and may elicit detrimental effects. Accordingly, suppression of the hydrogen bonding, for example by substitution of the amide nitrogen, can have significant effects on the structure of peptides and proteins.1 For example, L-proline, the only proteinogenic secondary amino acid, serves as an important structural guide in proteins. Poly(L-proline) can form two different types of helices (termed poly(L-proline) I and II helix; PPI and PPII).2−8 In the early days of peptide and polypeptide science, nonproteinogenic D-amino acids were often employed to better understand structural aspects of synthetic issues, the enzymatic degradation, and the influence on the structure and conformation. As an alternative, N-substituted amino acids other than proline were employed. N-Methylation of proteinogenic amino acids was studied in particular in the 1960s and 1970s to understand in more detail formation of secondary structures in the absence of hydrogen bonding (Figure 1).9−16

Scheme 1. Reaction of NCAs with Aniline with NCAs As Described By Curtius and Wessely in the Early 1920sa Figure 1. Structure of polypeptides and their structural variations. NSubstituted polypeptides, bearing substituents both at the nitrogen and the C-α have been rarely studied, with the prominent exception of poly(proline), a non-natural polymer of the only natural and proteinogenic amino acid with a secondary α-amine. Oligomers (and polymers) comprising N-substituted glycine as repeating units are termed (poly)peptoids.

a

The structure of the product, termed a polymeric anhydride, shows the differences in graphical depiction or understanding of the products.18,26.

Tonelli reported that the effect of N-methylation extended to the neighboring amino acid.14 This observation has structural implications in copolymers of amino acids and N-substituted glycines. Notably, N-methylation of polymers of alanine and various esters of glutamic acid leads to formation of helices, comparable to the poly(L-proline) helices.9,12,13,15−17 Important to note, the polymerization of N-carboxyanhydrides (NCAs) of N-substituted amino acids is not generally possible. The substitution at the nitrogen atom as well as the C3 atom appears to interfere with the polymerization. The only reported exceptions are the subject matter of this review, the NCAs of Nsubstituted glycines, proline-NCA (and derivatives), and Nmethylalanine-NCA.15 Poly(sarcosine) (PSR), the most simple polypeptoid, was among the early examples of synthetic polymers reported.18 Interestingly, for the most part of the last nine decades, PSR was considered and mainly investigated as a reference for synthetic polypeptides. Synthetic polypeptides were studied even before the concept of macromolecules was accepted by the scientific community in the 1920’s. The researcher who first prepared synthetic polypeptides,19−21 Hermann Leuchs, was working under the fiercest opponent of the concept of macromolecules,22,23 Nobel laureate Emil Fischer. Leuchs

In these early works, Sigmund and Wessely also remarked that NNCAs are conveniently purified by sublimation, whereas NCAs typically need to be recrystallized.18 Wessely also noted, in a systematic study, the effects of treatment of NCAs and NNCAs with water.29 In this early work, Wessely actually differentiated between the polymeric anhydrides obtained by NCA hydrolysis/polymerization and the known polypeptides (of natural origin, i.e., proteins). However, striking similarities with respect to analytical results were also noticed. Interestingly, it was also reported that the monomers are rather stable against ice-cold water, while at room temperature rapid degradation is observed. Many decades later, Poché et al. reported on washing NCAs with ice-cold water as an “unconventional” method to purify NCAs.30 Wessely followed up on his study and eventually used sarcosine-NCA, specifically since the “unpleasant properties” (what Wessely particularly referred to was the insoluble character of polyglycine) of the polymeric anhydride of glycine prevented further characterization.31 The purpose of using sarcosine-NCA was to allow investigation of suspected products of high molar mass. However, Wessely reported that despite this further study, it could not be decided whether polymeric 1754


Chemical Reviews

Review

Scheme 2. Mechanism of Polymerization of N-Substituted Glycine N-Carboxyanhydrides, Initiated by Primary Amines (Initiator Group and Propagating Species in Red, CO2 in Blue)

anhydrides or polypeptides were the product of the reaction.31 From our perspective, one could argue that the investigation and understanding of polypeptides was developed through polypeptoids. Of course, this distinction did not exist at that time. As the research areas of (poly)peptoids obtained via stepwise solid-phase submonomer synthesis (SPSS) and of those obtained by nucleophilic living condensative ring-opening polymerization (NuLCROP) have started to overlap in recent years, the terminology is sometimes a bit unclear. Against recommendations by IUPAC, the terms polydisperse and monodisperse remain common in the literature. Especially in the context of peptoids, these terms are particularly misleading. Therefore, we will use the term uniform for peptoids obtained from SPSS, as they are usually sequence and chain-length specific (disregarding impurities). The term nonuniform will be used in this Review for products obtained by NuLCROP, as they will always comprise a distribution of molar masses and cannot be sequence specific. Moreover, we will use the term peptoid for sequence-specific products of the submonomer synthesis, while polypeptoid will be used for the products of the ring-opening poylmerization. If unspecified, we will use the term (poly)peptoids. Higher homologues such as polymers of N-substituted β-alanine will be termed poly(β-peptoid)s, poly(γ-peptoid)s, and so on. With respect to the structure of (poly)peptoids, the primary structure is, as defined for peptides, the sequence of the repeating units. The secondary structure describes the relative short-range orientation of the repeating units, such as helices, sheets, loops, and turns. These secondary structures may organize to larger structural units, the tertiary structure. This structural hierarchy is defined intramolecularly. Herein, we will denote any structural motif, which involves intermolecular assembly as a quaternary (i.e., supramolecular) structural motif. Thus, micelles, supramolecular helices, and sheets, usually assembled from large numbers of individual (poly)peptoids fall into this category. In this definition, we deviate somewhat from the definition of quaternary structure in protein science, as structures of polymer micelles and sheets are much less defined as for example hemoglobin or even complex natural assemblies such as viral capsids. In this Review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview over peptoids and polypeptoids, their history, synthesis, physicochemical characteristics, as well as reported and potential applications. While advancing the frontier of supramolecular and macromolecular engineering with (poly)peptoids, we also need to be aware of what has been done before. We would like to note that in recent years, several other reviews on (poly)peptoids were published,32−34 some of which were focused on particular aspects,35 such as synthetic aspects of polypeptoids,36 hierarchical structures,37 or applications for sequence-specific peptoids.38 Other reviews are rather comprehensive.39 We would like to highlight in particular a recent Commentary by Zuckermann, a pioneer of peptoid

research.40 Here, we attempted to look both deeper and further than what we believe has been done before. We are also discussing a number of papers which appear to have been forgotten for decades. On the one hand, this should prevent reinventing the wheel with respect to (poly)peptoids in the years to come, and on the other hand, we hope that this gives a more complete picture from which we can develop this family of materials further in the future. At the same time, we intend to present a complete picture of why we believe that (poly)peptoids stand at the moment at the frontier of supramolecular and macromolecular engineering.

2. SYNTHESIS AND CHARACTERIZATION OF (POLY)PEPTOIDS (Poly)peptoids are characterized by their high versatility in molecular design and promising properties. Depending on the desired chain length, quantity, and degree of definition (uniform or nonuniform), two different approaches toward the synthesis of (poly)peptoids have been investigated intensively. On the one hand, ring-opening polymerization of NNCAs is a facile and rapid method to obtain disperse polypeptoid chains up to high degrees of polymerization with excellent definition. On the other hand, stepwise solid-phase submonomer synthesis provides an opportunity to obtain essentially uniform peptoids. 2.1. Ring-Opening Polymerization

Ring opening polymerization (ROP) of heterocyclic NNCAs is a facile and convenient and frequently used strategy for making well-defined polypeptoids and can be performed either in solution, in bulk, or on solid phase. In principle, the NNCAs bear two reactive centers, the electrophilic the electrophilic C2 and C5 opening of the heterocycle can be achieved by different types of initiators. Most commonly, nucleophiles are used, with primary amines being the most intensively investigated species. Polymerization proceeds following the so-called normal amine mechanism (Scheme 2), which was proposed for sarcosine-NCA by Waley and Watson41 in the middle of the 20th century. Nucleophilic attack of the initiator on C5 induces ring opening and formation of a carbamic acid. After elimination of carbon dioxide, a secondary amine becomes available for further propagation. Overall, ROP of NNCAs has a highly living character but is very sensitive to nucleophilic impurities. However, it should be noted that such impurities will not lead to termination of the polymerization but rather to unwanted initiation and potentially multimodal products. The controlled manner of this method was demonstrated with NNCAs bearing different alkyl side chains (R = methyl, ethyl, propyl, n-butyl, iso-butyl), yielding polymers with Poisson distribution and degrees of polymerization in good agreement with the monomer-toinitiator ratio ([M]0/[I]0), if the chain length is short or moderate. At higher degrees of polymerization, many researchers have observed that the chain lengths are often 1755


Chemical Reviews

Review

multiblock copolypeptoids bearing aliphatic side chains (C1− C5) were performed by the Luxenhofer group,44,54 thus pointing out the extraordinarily robust living character of the NuLCROP of NNCAs (Figure 3). Strong dependence of the

lower than expected.42−45 This, however, seems not to be a systematic or method related error and is likely to be attributed to impurities in the reaction mixture. The living character of the polymerization was first demonstrated by Waley and Watson.41 The Poisson-type distribution of the products was first demonstrated by Sisido et al.46 2.1.1. Side Chain Variations. For many decades, methyl was the predominant substituent employed. Higher homologues were barely investigated and polymer properties remained essentially unknown. Much longer aliphatic side chains up to C14 were later introduced by Zhang et al.47 Early work suggested that other N-substituted NNCAs are not suited for polymerizations. For example, N-iso-propylglycine-NCA was thought to be not polymerizable using NuLCROP after early reports.48 However, Schlaad and co-workers obtained poly(N-iso-propylglycine) with low dispersity in bulk polymerization by addition of the initiator directly to a melt of the NNCA.49 After many decades, in which virtually the only polypeptoid was PSR, the molecular toolbox for NNCA monomers has increased to more than a dozen (Figure 2).

Figure 3. Kinetic investigations of the ring-opening polymerization of N-substituted N-carboxyanhydrides. (a) Sarcosince-NCA polymerizes faster than N-ethylglycine, but no conclusive trend was observed with respect to the influence of pressure on the polymerization rate. (b) Addition of strong Brønsted acids (trifluoromethane sulfonic acid, TMSA) can be used to adjust the polymerization rate while the polymerization retains a living character. (c) A profound influence of the polymerization rate of NNCAs was found. For example, Sar-NCA polymerization in benzonitrile was found much faster than in Nmethylpyrrolidone (NMR). However, the polymerization of Sar-NCA is faster in NMP than the polymerization of N-n-butylglycine-NCA. Reprinted from ref 43. Copyright 2011 American Chemical Society.

Figure 2. Overview of N-substituted glycine N-carboxyanhydrides that have been used for ring-opening polymerization to date.43,45,47,49,50

The incorporation of substituents bearing functional groups instead of simple alkyl side chains requires additional protection of the functional groups if these would interfere with monomer or polymer synthesis. Nevertheless, variability of functional side chains is essential for the development of (poly)peptoids as smart or functional biomaterials. Therefore, post-polymerization modifications currently represent the method of choice. Schlaad and co-workers described the synthesis and polymerization of N-allylglycine-NCA for further modification, for instance with sugar, using thiol−ene photochemistry.51 Zhang and co-workers applied copper catalyzed [3 + 2] azide− alkyne cycloaddition click chemistry to copolypeptoids with Npropargyl side chains.52 More recently, Schlaad et al. demonstrated the great potential of poly(N-propargylglycine) as a platform for modification of polypeptoids53 (see section 2.4.3). 2.1.2. Polymerization Kinetics. More detailed investigations on the synthesis and characterization of both homo and

polymerization rates on the substituents (methyl ≫ ethyl > propyl > n-butyl > iso-butyl) as well as on the reaction medium (benzonitrile > N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone > tetrahydrofuran) was observed during kinetic studies. All polymerizations proceeded to quantitative monomer conversion following pseudo firstorder kinetics, the molar mass of the polypeptoid was linearly proportional to monomer consumption, and polymers exhibited Poisson distribution. Furthermore, kinetic investigations on the influence of substoichiometric amounts of a strong acid (trifluoromethanesulfonic acid, TMSA) revealed lowering of the propagation rate. In contrary, substoichiometric amounts of weak acids were reported to increase the propagation rate.55 In order to assess influences of the CO2 partial pressure and reaction temperature in detail, further kinetic studies are required. In the case of NHC-catalyzed ROP 1756


Chemical Reviews

Review

Scheme 3. Different Approaches Toward (Poly)(β-peptoid)s that Have Been Described in Literaturea

a

Reprinted with permission from ref 39. Copyright 2013 Wiley Periodicals Inc.

ethylglycine and N-butylglycine was published by Zhang and co-workers. In order to prove the random character of the copolymerization, reactivity ratios of both monomers were measured and determined according to the Fineman−Ross method and found to be nearly identical.71 More recently, similar copolymers were employed as macroinitiators for polymer brushes (see section 2.4.2.1).72 Random copolymers obtained from sarcosine and butylglycine N-thiocarboxyanhydrides (sarcosine- and BuGly-NTA) were shown to be thermoresponsive and exhibit reversible phase transitions in aqueous solution.69 2.1.4.2. Block Copolymers. Taking advantage of the ROP living character, Guo and Zhang were first to report the synthesis of block copolypeptoids.73 Their work was mainly focused on the investigation of cyclic polypeptoids (see section 2.4.1), linear block copolypeptoids comprising N-methylglycine (sarcosine), and N-butylglycine were synthesized for the purpose of comparison. However, the characterization of these linear polymers was limited to 1H NMR spectroscopy and viscometry, therefore, one could argue that the block copolymer character was not demonstrated at this time. Since then, the possibility of preparing multiblock copolymers either by consecutively adding fresh monomer directly to a polymerization reaction or by the use of macroinitiators has been demonstrated.43−45,74 2.1.5. (Poly)(β-peptoid)s and (Poly)(γ-peptoid)s. The polymer class of (poly)(β-peptoid)s can formally be obtained by the addition of a single methylene group to the backbone of an (poly)peptoid or the N-substitution of (poly)(β-peptide)s. Although a larger number of synthetic routes can be applied in order to synthesize (poly)(β-peptoid)s (Scheme 3), both monomer and polymer synthesis are more challenging as compared to polypeptoids. Furthermore, poor solubility in most common solvents impedes handling and applicability in drug delivery.75 Like polypeptoids, poly(β-peptoid)s can be obtained by ROP of the respective NNCAs, which are, in case of the poly(βpeptoid)s, six-membered rings instead of a five-membered ones. Around 1960, a couple of different β-NCAs and β-NNCAs have

of NNCAs in toluene and DMSO, excess pressure of CO2 did not appear to have any influence, as reported by Zhang.56 Also an earlier paper57 and a very recent DFT calculation by Liu and Ling58 suggest that the decarboxylation is not the ratedetermining step. 2.1.3. Polymerization of N-Thiocarboxyanhydrides. NNCAs are known to be highly susceptible to hydrolysis; this fact may have hampered development of the field for decades. Therefore, a number of attempts toward polypeptides and polypeptoids from the more stable (N-substituted) Nthiocarboxyanhydrides (NTAs) have been made. First synthesized in the 1950s,59−61 NTAs are known to be less sensitive to moisture and heat, thus providing higher long-term stability. NTAs have been applied for the stepwise synthesis of oligopeptides62−64 but also in polymerizations.65−67 Primary amine-initiated polymerizations of sarcosine-NTA as well as D,L-leucine-NTA and D,L-phenylalanine-NTA were investigated by Kricheldorf et al. in 2008.68 Although both yield and degree of polymerization of the polymers obtained from sarcosineNTA were almost twice as high as compared to polymers obtained from D,L-leucine-NTA and D,L-phenylalanine-NTA, the molar masses remained unpredictable, and NTAs were thought to be unsuitable for the preparation of high molar mass polymers. In 2014, Ling and co-workers demonstrated the convenient and controlled ROP of sarcosine-NTA initiated by amineendfunctionalized poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG).69 In contrast to Kricheldorf, who performed polymerizations at room temperature, Ling et al. applied a reaction temperature of 60 °C, yielding well-defined block copolymers and degrees of polymerization in good agreement with the feed ratios of monomer to initiator. The same group was the first to synthesize, characterize, and polymerize N-butylglycine-NTA.70 Using rare earth borohydride initiators, polymerization proceeded largely controlled up to a monomer-to-initiator ratio of 300. 2.1.4. Copolymerization of N-Carboxyanhydrides. 2.1.4.1. Random Copolymers. A detailed characterization of thermoresponsive random copolypeptoids consisting of N1757


Chemical Reviews

Review

Scheme 4. Peptoid Synthesis by Monomer and Submonomer Methoda

a

For each type, one monomer addition is represented. Every approach can be divided in acylation and amination, which can be repeated several times followed by a final cleavage step.

solid-phase synthesis which was pioneered by Merrifield for peptides.88 Today, solid-phase organic synthesis is a widely applied concept that is used commercially and in academia. It is employed worldwide to create sequence-specific oligomers or small polymers such as oligosaccharides or oligonucleotides which underlines the continued and outstanding importance of this method. Besides the advantages, the highly inefficient synthesis and the restricted chain length, usually less than 50 monomer units, have to be considered. Throughout the literature, we could identify five methods for the stepwise synthesis of peptoids (Scheme 4). Early approaches toward solid-phase synthesis of peptoids by Simon et al., subsequently termed monomer method, are essentially analogous to 9-fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl solidphase peptide synthesis (Fmoc SPPS) (Scheme 4A), however, with the main difference that N-substituted glycine monomers are used instead of regular amino acids. A major disadvantage of this approach is the necessity to prepare protected Nsubstituted glycine monomers, which are not readily available and not always easy to synthesize.89 As Scheme 4 indicates, the other four methods (collectively referred to as submonomer methods) have in common that the acyl and amine functions of each monomer unit derive from two different steps. Route B, strongly related to the monomer method, is based on the reductive alkylation of glycine with the suitable aldehyde or ketone to obtain the desired N-alkylated glycine derivative (Scheme 4B).90,91 The most common submonomer method, often termed solid-phase submonomer synthesis (SPSS), was developed by Zuckermann and co-workers by using two readily available building blocks, so-called “submonomers”.92 In a first step, a haloacetic acid, activated in situ with N,N′-diisopropylcarbodii-

been investigated for polymerization. Initially, Birkofer et al. demonstrated the successful synthesis and subsequent polymerization of N-p-tolyl-β-alanine-NCA by both thermal and nucleophilic initiation using p-toluidine.76 Furthermore, Nphenyl-β-alanine-NCA was polymerized by heating above the melting point as well as nucleophilic initiation by water.77 Zilkha and co-workers reported the synthesis of poly(N-benzylβ-alanine) from ROP of N-benzyl-β-alanine-NCA, whereas Nbenzyl-β-aminobutyric acid-NCA as well as N-benzyl-β-aminoisobutyric acid-NCA showed no tendency to polymerize.78 A long time later, Luxenhofer et al. demonstrated the living character of N-substituted β-alanine-NCA polymerization.79 Kinetic studies revealed pseudo-first-order kinetics with high fidelity of the propagating species up to high monomer conversions. As shown by MALDI-TOF-MS measurements, homo as well as block copolymers with Poisson distribution were obtained. However, solubility was a major issue, and the polymers had a strong tendency to precipitate from the reaction mixture. Apart from ROP of NNCAs, β- as well as poly(γ-peptoids) can be obtained using a metal-mediated ROP approach. In this case, N-alkylaziridines80,81 or N-alkylazetidines,82,83 respectively, are copolymerized with carbon monoxide in a so-called metal-catalyzed carbonylative polymerization of heterocycles (COPH), which also has been employed in the synthesis of polyesters84,85 and polyamides.86,87 2.2. Solid-Phase Syntheses toward Highly Defined (Poly)peptoids

2.2.1. Stepwise Synthesis from Solid Supports. Chemical synthesis of polymers with absolute sequence control and control over the chain length is only possible by using 1758


Chemical Reviews

Review

Scheme 5. Illustration of (Poly)peptide and (Poly)peptoid Syntheses Using Solid Supportsa

a

While the solid-phase submonomer synthesis has been developed over the last 20 years, the stepwise synthesis of oligopeptides has been pioneered by Merrifield, which won him the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1984. In contrast, the ring-opening polymerization of NCAs and NNCAs using solid supports has been developed recently. Reprinted with permission from ref 39. Copyright 2013 Wiley Periodicals Inc.

on stable helical structures designed by β-peptoids hexamers will be discussed in section 3.2.2. 2.2.2. Ring-Opening Polymerization from Solid Supports. The advantages of the solid-phase synthesis appear promising also for polymer-analogue modifications and, thus, macromolecular engineering. To drive polymer modification to high yield, the use of a large excess of reactant, with which the polymer should be modified, is highly beneficial. For the preparation of bioconjugates, the possibility to use a gel, which is preloaded for example with a peptide sequence,99 is intriguing. Consequently, the combination of SPPS and solid-phase initiated polymerization has been studied by several researchers.99,100 Recently, Luxenhofer and co-workers have reported on the solid-phase peptoid polymerization (SP3) using Rinktype resins as initiators and N-substituted glycine-NCAs as monomers.74 It was found that numerous parameters are relevant to achieve well-defined polymers without excessive fractionation employed before.99 Besides the amine density on the resin, which should be rather low, the monomer concentration should be relatively high (1M). Furthermore, in order to slow down the polymerization rate with respect to monomer diffusion into the gel, addition of acids for partial protonation of the propagating species has been demonstrated to be advantageous for achieving low polymer dispersity. Furthermore, the authors demonstrated that the polymerization has a living character to essentially quantitative monomer conversion. On the basis of these results, the authors prepared a pentablock copolymer, similarly as has been shown before for synthetic approaches in solution.44 The pentablock copolymer was well-defined as has been shown by gel permeation chromatography (GPC). Besides the fact that this new approach is very interesting for bioconjugates and polymer therapeutics, it also can be freely combined with SPPS or SPSS, which is very intriguing for the preparation of complex macromolecular structures (Scheme 5). 2.2.3. Combinatorial Libraries for Peptoid Ligand Screening. The efficient discovery of drugs or biomolecular ligands almost appears inconceivable today without the usage of

mide (DIC), is attached to the resin followed by SN2 substitution of the halogen with a primary amine. The decisive advantage of this strategy lies in the use of primary amines to introduce the substituent. Besides the fact that these are available in a large variety, they are also often rather inexpensive compared to protected amino acids or protected N-substituted amino acids. Nevertheless, side chains with reactive functional groups require protection, even though many heterocycles can be used directly without protection.93 Using SPSS, uniformity with respect to chain length and monomer sequence is possible, in theory. In reality, purities of ≥95% (after purification) are regularly reported for peptoids with up to 50 monomer units. Recently, the use of N-substituted o-nitrobenzenesulfonamide derivatives as alternative building blocks in the synthesis of peptoids was demonstrated by Biron and co-workers (Scheme 4D).94 This approach is suitable for the preparation of peptoids bearing different hydroxylated side chains. Kodadek and co-workers adapted the submonomer method for the photolithographic synthesis of arrays by implementing a light dependent process into the synthetic scheme (Scheme 4E).95 Usage of UV-irradiation to unmask a protected surface moiety allows for the creation of spatially defined arrays. Furthermore, sequence-defined β-peptoids are accessible via SPSS. Hamper and co-workers applied a two-step approach by using a Wang resin as solid-phase and acrylic acid and primary amines as submonomers.96 In a first step, acryloyl chloride was linked to the resin, followed by the Michael addition of the appropriate amine. Hamper et al. prepared several different βpeptoids. However, they comprised only two or three monomer units. Shuey and co-workers reported solubility issues with β-peptoids after they reached approximately five repeating units, a major issue also in the polymerization of βNNCAs (see section 2.1.5). To overcome these limitations, Shuey et al. coupled oligomers comprising three or four repeating units in solution to obtain longer chains up to 18 units.97 In 2006, Arvidsson et al. described the solid-phase synthesis of N-chiral β-peptoids with phenylethylamine substituents.98 Due to several optimizations, the chain length could be extended up to 11 monomer units. Very recent results 1759


Chemical Reviews

Review

Scheme 6. Proposed Mechanism of NHC-Mediated Polymerization of NNCA73a

a

Due to coulomb interactions, chain ends of the zwitterionic intermediate species remain in close contact. Adapted from ref 56. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society.

combinatorial library synthesis that provides an efficient way to achieve high molecular diversity. Thus, a variety of approaches for spatially resolved immobilization of peptoids has been researched. Although this issue may appear rather remote from our common approaches of supra- and macromolecular engineering, we believe that the synthetic possibilities available for (poly)peptoids are ideally suited to look beyond the common approaches. At first, it was obvious to adapt techniques like the SPOT synthesis, which was first presented by Frank and is well-established for the rapid preparation of peptide arrays.101,102 Wenschuh and co-workers performed solid-phase synthesis on cellulose membranes using an adjusted submonomer approach.103 Due to the different kinetic situation on continuous surfaces and the large number of free hydroxyl moieties on the cellulose, bromoacetic acid 2,4-dinitrophenylester was used for the acylation of the secondary amine of the growing peptoid. Since every single reaction is spatially isolated from its neighbor, a library consisting of thousands of peptoids is obtained on the solid support. Another common method is the usage of peptoid-based small-molecule microarrays (SMMs) that provide unique patterns for individual proteins, demonstrating the ability of peptoid libraries for biological applications.104 Kodadek et al. produced these arrays by first synthesizing a peptoid library on 500 μm poly(styrene) resins using split and pool synthesis. To prepare microarrays consisting of more than 7.500 octameric peptoids, they attached the synthesized oligomers to maleimide-functionalized glass microscope slides. Either fluorescein-labeled proteins or unlabeled proteins visualized with a fluorescent secondary antibody were hybridized to those arrays resulting in identification of reproducible and unique patterns. On the basis of these experiments with purified proteins, Kodadek and co-workers investigated the suitability of the peptoid microarrays employing an antibody-based sandwich assay. More particularly, they hybridized a mixture of native proteins to the arrays then probed it with an antibody raised against a certain target protein. To complete the sandwich structure, the array was labeled with a secondary antibody. The sensitivity limit is between 10 and 100 nM of protein and is

thus well below the binding affinities earlier identified for peptoid-protein interactions. Moreover, the Kodadek lab evolved a general method to identify diagnostically useful antibodies without the demand for antigen identification, by using combinatorial peptoid arrays. They discovered potentially suitable diagnostic biomarkers in humans via identification of two candidate IgG biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease.105 Also using small molecule microarrays, Disney and co-workers identified peptoids that inhibit the group I intron RNA from Candida albicans, an opportunistic pathogen that is problematic for immunocompromised hosts.106 Furthermore, Kodadek and co-workers synthesized arrays of different cyclic peptoids by using an optimized “one bead two compound” approach that is tailored to the creation of microarrays.107 Formats like equimolar mixture screening,108,109 OBOC (one-bead-one-compound) screening110,111 and positional scanning libraries112,113 also contribute to the variety of available combinatorial libraries. By using the first method, Zuckermann and co-workers at the Chiron Group discovered several effective peptoid trimer ligands for G-protein-coupled receptors.108 2.3. Ribosomal Synthesis

A relatively novel approach toward the synthesis of (poly)peptoids and peptoid-peptide hybrids, which is referred to as ribosomal synthesis, was introduced by Suga et al.114 Directed by mRNA, this method is based on the translation machinery, using genetic code reprogramming. For this, two different systems are applied: artificial tRNA translation ribozymes (flexizymes) and wPURE, a reconstituted E. coli cell-free system in which proteinogenic amino acids or related aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are withdrawn. Ribosomal synthesis was shown to be not suited for bulky or charged substituents. However, the same group recently demonstrated the introduction of charged functional groups by post-translational bio-orthogonal chemical or enzymatic conversion.115 Although, peptoid-peptide hybrids were prepared successfully, linear (poly)peptoids could not be obtained so far. 1760


Chemical Reviews

Review

Figure 4. Comparison of the (a) 1H NMR (60 MHz) of cyclotrisarcosyl (in CDCl3) and (b) cyclohexasarcosyl (in CD3OD). Reprinted with permission from ref 126. Copyright 1969 Royal Society of Chemistry. (c) Spatial view of the energetically favored “crown” conformation of cyclotrisarcosyl. Atoms are color-coded (gray, carbon; white, hydrogen; red, oxygen; blue, nitrogen). Remodelled with ChemBio3D Ultra 13.0 using data from ref 128.

2.4. Macromolecular Engineering

Inspired by these results, Zhang and co-workers investigated the NHC-mediated ROP of NNCAs.73 Well-defined cyclic diblock copolymers of N-butylglycine-NCA and sarcosine-NCA were obtained by sequential addition of the monomers. Further studies revealed that polymer weight as well as propagation rate are dependent on and controllable by the choice of the NHC as well as the solvent.56 In solvents like tetrahydrofuran (THF) and toluene, which have low dielectric constants, characteristics of a living polymerization are observable. Suppression of side reactions is based on the reduced nucleophilicity and basicity of negatively charged chain ends of the zwitterionic propagating species. Both chain ends remain in close contact due to Coulombic interactions, thus maintaining a cyclic architecture during polymerization (Scheme 6). In contrary, polymerizations in solvents with high dielectric constants, such as N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), are strongly influenced by side reactions. More detailed investigations on the NHC-mediated ROP of N-butylglycine-NCA revealed that the degree of

2.4.1. Cyclic (Poly)peptoids. Kricheldorf et al. observed the formation of substantial proportions of cyclic PSR after initiation of sarcosine-NCA polymerization with pyridine.67 However, due to simultaneous formation of linear PSR, control over the molecular weight of the resulting polymer is very limited. Further formation of significant amounts of cyclic PSR were described by initiation using tertiary amines like Hünig’s base, N,N-diisopropylethylamine,116 and thermal polymerization in bulk at 120 °C117 or solvent-induced nucleophilic polymerization.118 In all cases, polymerization was assumed to proceed via a zwitterionic mechanism. N-Heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs) are well-known as a class of catalysts for the ROP of various heterocyclic monomers including cyclic esters,119 carbonates,120 siloxanes,121 and oxiranes like ethylene oxide,122,123 yielding polymers with defined molar mass and low dispersity. 1761


Chemical Reviews

Review

polymerization is well-adjustable by the initial ratio of monomer to NHC.56 Kinetic studies in toluene demonstrated similar effects of the substituents on the propagation rate as observed for linear polymerizations (ethyl > propyl = n-butyl > allyl). Furthermore, an inverse relationship between propagation rate and steric demand of the NHC was observed; polymerization proceeds faster with less sterically demanding NHCs. However, it should also be noted that in many cases GPC traces often show a shoulder or bimodality at higher molar masses. This could point toward chain coupling events during the reaction, which are easily envisioned in the zwitterionic mechanism. However, artifacts from GPC analysis cannot be excluded. Besides these comparably large cyclic polypeptoids, a few groups have also worked on the cyclization of peptoids. Here, we want to mention two interesting papers that highlight and review this topic in a more detailed manner.124,125 Interestingly, it appears that also in this instance, peptoids, in particular oligo(sarcosine) were initially investigated as a easier-to-handle alternative to oligopeptides several decades ago.126,127 The NMR studies on cyclic oligo(sarcosine)s by Titlestad and coworkers are very interesting and a showcase for the structural effects on the 1H NMR spectra of oligo- and poly(sarcosine)s. Exemplarily, while the cyclic trimer exhibits a single signal for the methyl group, the methylene group splits into a quartett with an extremely large coupling constant (Figure 4a). Such spectrum can be explained by a single configuration of all amide groups (cis) and a ring structure that deviates strongly from planar. The energetic preference for such cis−cis−cis “crown” structure was recently confirmed by DFT calculations (Figure 4c).128 In contrast, the 1H NMR spectrum of a cylic hexamer shows no hint toward any structural preference (Figure 4b). In fact, this NMR spectrum essentially looks like the spectrum of a linear poly(sarcosine). Unfortunately, the authors measured the hexamer in deuterated methanol, while all other spectra were obtained in CDCl3 and the solvent has a major influence on the structural preferences of (poly)peptoids.45,129 The cyclic oligomers were obtained after activation of the C-terminus as 2,4,5-trichlorophenylester in pyridine at high dilution (i.e., a head-to-tail approach). Purification was achieved by ionexchange chromatography and subsequent sublimation. Titlestad et al. later reported on a crystal structure of cyclooctasarcosyl.127 Later, Kirshenbaum et al. also used a head-to-tail approach to form macrocycles of a sequence synthesized via the stepwise solid-phase submonomer synthesis (Figure 5a).130 They synthesized a broad array of sequences from five to 20 repeat units and cyclized them within 5 min at room temperature. As previously observed by Titlestad,126,127 the macrocyclization leads into an enhanced conformational ordering due to the covalent constraint and made the crystallization of cyclic peptoid hexamer and octamer possible. These first X-ray crystallographic structures of peptoid hetero-oligomers suggest that peptoid macrocycles can assemble into a reverse-turn conformation, which will be discussed in section 3.2.3. Apart from the described head-to-tail formation of peptoid macrocycles by amide coupling chemistry,130−132 side-chain-to-tail formation via boronate esters133 have been utilized as well. Another approach is to form macrocycles directly on the solid support before cleaving the peptoid structures. Here, sidechain-to-side-chain cyclization via cycloaddition (Figure 5b)134 and side-chain-to-tail cyclization via ring-closing metathesis (Figure 5c),135 amide coupling,136 nucleophilic substitution

Figure 5. Chemical structures of (a) head-to-tail cyclized peptoid hexamer by amide coupling after cleavage from the solid support, (b) side chain-to-side chain cyclized peptoid octamer by [3 + 2] azide− alkyne cycloaddition and (c) side chain-to-tail cyclized peptoids by ring-closing metathesis. The latter are cyclized while still linked to the solid support and subsequently cleaved from it. Reprinted with permission from refs 130, 134 and 135. Copyright 2007 and 2011 American Chemical Society.

under microwave irradiation,137 thioether formation138 or triazine bridges (Scheme 7)139 have been used. The latter two approaches are especially intriguing strategies for post highthroughput screening conversion via ring-opening into linear peptoids, which can be sequenced by tandem mass spectrometry. Another approach to synthesize and cyclize peptoid oligomers is via head-to-tail formation without a solid support directly in solution.140,141 By this route, also cyclic βpeptoids,142 α,β−peptoids,143 and semipeptoids144 could be synthesized. Finally, to enhance the conformational ordering even more by an additional covalent constraint, side chains of macrocycles have been bridged to form bicyclic peptoid structures, either directly on the solid support (Scheme 8),145 or in solution.146 Considering these constrained structures and their relatively large size, one might think of those bicyclic peptoids as promising modulators of protein−protein interactions or as scaffolds for drug design. 2.4.2. Branched Polypeptoids and Polypeptoid Brushes. Multi- and macroinitiators as well as macromonomers enable the generation of polymers with versatile appearance strongly depending on the nature of the initiator or the macromonomer. Branched and hyperbranched polymers as well as polymer brushes are an important aspect of macromolecular engineering. As initiators for the NuLCROP, primary amine groups are particularly well-suited. These functional groups can be attached to surfaces like glass or they are terminal groups of other polymers/side chains like a poly(trimethylenimine) dendrimer, chitosan, or a linear poly(N-(6aminohexyl)methacrylamide).147−153 2.4.2.1. Polymer Brushes. Polymer brushes can be synthesized in solution72,154−158 or on surfaces.159−162 The first approach gives products resembling molecular bottlebrushes, while the second one gives structures resembling carpet-like structures.72,150−153 Also carpets of bottlebrushes can be produced.163−165 1762


Chemical Reviews

Review

Scheme 7. Representation of the Encoding-Free Strategy to Convert a “Hit” Cyclic Peptoid into a Sequenceable (By Tandem Mass Spectrometry) Linear Peptoida

a

After oxidation of the thioether, the sulfone acts as a leaving group and can be released by a nucleophilic displacement reaction. Reprinted with permission from ref 139. Copyright 2010 The Royal Society of Chemistry.

the result by Frank et al. obtained for surface-initiated vapor deposition polymerization (SI-VDP).170 Hydrophilic, hydrophobic, and amphiphilic polypeptoid brushes could be obtained in a straightforward manner. The amine-modified surfaces only need to be immersed in a monomer solution. Furthermore, the formation of block copolymer brushes was demonstrated. Again, this could easily be achieved by immersing the polypeptoid-modified surface into a fresh monomer solution (Figure 6a). Water contact angle measurements not only indicate the living character of SI-ROP of NNCAs but also hint at a dense nature of the obtained brushes. Restructuring of the polymer brushes, when a hydrophilic brush was topped by a hydrophobic brush and subsequently incubated with water could not be detected.150 More recently, the same group demonstrated that structured polypeptoid brushes are accessible either via photolithographic route or via microcontact printing (Figure 6b).151 2.4.2.1.2. Graft Copolymers and Brushes from Multifunctional Initiators. Another class of intriguing molecular architectures, featuring a linear polymeric backbone and densely grafted side chains, are bottlebrushes.171 Aoi and coworkers used grafting from macroinitiators with multiple initiation sites, namely chitin and chitosan, for ROP of sarcosine-NCA in DMSO.148,149 Unfortunately chitin, which can be degraded by enzymes like Chitinase or lysozyme, is poorly soluble and hence is less used as material. Graft copolymers having longer side chains exhibited higher solubility in water. Additionally, the authors were able to demonstrate that chitin-graf t-poly(sarcosine) is still degraded by the aforementioned enzymes.148 Subsequently, chitosan, an amino polysaccharide obtained by alkaline deacetylation of chitin, was used as macroinitiator.149 However, chitosan is, like chitin, poorly soluble in common organic solvents. The synthesis of chitosan-graf t-poly(sarcosine) in DMSO is controlled through the use of carboxylic acids like nicotinic acid or isonicotinic acid. The propagating amine is in equilibrium with a dormant ammonium species and, however, the equilibrium being shifted to the ammonium side. A similar mechanism has been described by Schlaad et al. for the ammonium-mediated ROP of NCAs.172,173 Recently, Zhang and co-workers used a different approach, namely a grafting-through approach. They copolymerized Nethylglycine- and N-butylglycine-NCAs using a 5-norbornene2-methylamine initiator. Afterwards, they polymerized the polypeptoid macromonomer by ring-opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP) using the Grubbs’ second generation

Scheme 8. Synthetic Strategy of a One-Step Bicyclization into a Triazine-Bridged Bicyclic Peptoida

a

Reprinted from ref 145. Copyright 2011 American Chemical Society.

2.4.2.1.1. Brushes by Surface-Initiated Polymerization. It is typically argued that polymer brushes with high density are only accessible by a grafting-from approach.161 Therefore, the surface-initiated (SI) polymerization is crucial. These processes have been studied for polypeptides for some time. Initially, this was realized by SI-ROP of NCAs by immersing the aminofunctionalized surface in a suitable monomer solution.166 However, the average thickness is only 0.11 nm as determined by ellipsometry. Klok and co-workers used Nε-oligo(ethylene glycol)succinate-L-lysine-NCA as a monomer and two different aminosilanes immobilized on silicon, glass, or quartz substrates as initiators. The achieved thickness was below 5 nm. Nevertheless, the brushes were reported to be effective in avoiding nonspecific protein adsorption.167 Besides the described approaches in solution, Frank and co-workers have studied the chemical vapor polymerization of NCAs to obtain polypeptide brushes using amine-functionalized surfaces.168−170 Since polypeptoids are intriguing alternatives to polypeptides, Jordan, Luxenhofer, and co-workers investigated the SI-ROP of NNCAs from solutions using (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES) modified silicon dioxide substrates as initiators.150 Surprisingly, the brush height that could be realized resembles 1763


Chemical Reviews

Review

Figure 6. (a) Preparation of amphiphilic block copolypeptoid brushes from amine-functionalized surfaces by living surface initiated ROP via consecutive monomer addition. Sarcosine-NCA yields hydrophilic brushes (blue) while N-butylglycine yields hydrophobic ones (red). Reprinted from ref 150. Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society. (b) Patterned SAM initiator surfaces by microcontact printing (top) and UV-lithography (below) and consecutive surface-initiated living condensative ring-opening polymerization (SI-LCROP) of sarcosine-NCA to patterned PSR brushes. The brush terminal secondary amine was further used for selective functionalization with different dyes as model compounds. Reproduced with permission from ref 151. Copyright 2015 Wiley-VCH.

Scheme 9. Synthesis of Cylindrical PSR Brushesa

catalyst.72 Thus, by choosing appropriate monomers, amphiphilic bottlebrush copolypeptoids could be obtained. More recently, Hörtz et al. investigated cylindrical brushes with polypeptoid side chains.152,153 In contrast to Zhang et al.,52 they used multimacroinitiators, namely poly(N-(6aminohexyl)methacrylamide) (PAHMA) and poly(L-lysine) (PLL), to polymerize sarcosine-NCA or to generate core− shell brushes, consisting of sarcosine and lysine, in a graftingfrom approach (Scheme 9). PSR brushes were also functionalized with azide groups on the ends of their side chains, which can be utilized for further bioconjugation.52 2.4.2.2. Star Polymers. In a wide range of fields from molecular science to materials science, spherical molecules and structures are of growing interest because of their significant features. For example, star polymers exhibit a low viscosity and are discussed as unimolecular micelles (e.g., for drug delivery). Especially the synthesis of dendrimers and linear polymers as block copolymers is intriguing due to the combination of characteristic properties.174,175 Very recently, Adeli et al. summarized the importance of linear−dendritic copolymers as supramolecular anticancer drug delivery systems.176 Okada and co-workers used poly(trimethylenimine) (PTMI) dendrimer of 64-NH2-terminal-type to initiate the ROP of sarcosine-NCA (Figure 7).147 The authors postulate that initiation from all the terminal amino functions occurred even for the shortest chain length, consisting of only two monomer units. They refer to the 13C NMR spectra that do not show attributed to α- and β-

a

AFM height micrographs of (a) PSR brush spin-cast from methanolic solution (backbone: polymethacrylate; spacer: 6-aminohexyl; counterion: TFA) and (b) PSR brush spin-cast from aqueous solution (backbone: polypeptide; spacer: 4-aminobutyl; counterion: HBr). Adapted from ref 153. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.

1764


Chemical Reviews

Review

Figure 7. When using a poly(trimethyleneimine) initiator for the radial-growth polymerization of sarcosine-NCA, star-like PSR is obtained.147

methylene moieties of unreacted termini of the PTMI. We find it important to note that this is rather unlikely based on purely statistical consideration: taking into account a Poisson distribution function, the probability for unreacted amine functions should be about 14% (about 9 out of 64). It is questionable whether a cursory analysis by 13C NMR spectra is suitable to rule out the presence of unreacted dendrimer termini at this relation. However, this discrepancy might be explained by a significantly faster initiation as compared to propagation. Since it may be considered a reasonable assumption that primary amines react faster as compared to the propagating species. However, to the best of our knowledge, this has not been experimentally confirmed or quantified in this context. 2.4.3. Polymer-Analogue Modification of (Poly)peptoids. Schlaad and co-workers described the synthesis and polymerization of N-allylglycine-NCA for further modification using thiol−ene photochemistry.51 In absence of a photoinitiator, irradiation with UV-light yielded moderate degrees of modification as determined by ESI mass spectrometry as well as 1H NMR spectroscopy. Short poly(N-allylglycine)s, having less than 20 repeat units and being soluble in water, could be reacted with 1-thioglycerol or 1-thio-glucose, in the presence of a hydroxy-4′-(2-hydroxyethoxy)-2-methylpropiophenone (HEMP) photoinitiator, to give high modification yields (>90%). Zhang and co-workers investigated cyclic brush-like polymers, that were synthesized by tandem organo-mediated zwitterionic polymerization followed by CuAAC modification with PEG-N3 via a grafting-onto approach.52 Beside poly(Npropargylglycine) homopolymer macrocycles, also cyclic poly(N-propargylglycine-co-N-butylglycine) copolymers were studied. Interestingly, the grafting densities were noticeably higher in the latter case with the copolymer which can be attributed to a facilitated access to the propargyl groups. AFM measurements of cyclic brushlike polymers showed donut-shape-nanostructures with the average diameter of 362 nm for a randomcopolymer and revealed ring-shaped structures for the homopolymer which have a slightly smaller average diameter of 283 nm (Figure 8). The theoretical lateral dimension is approximately seven or eight times lower with respect to the measured values. The authors attribute this to the tip effect in AFM imaging, resulting in overestimation of the lateral features.

Figure 8. Synthesis of amplitude images of homopolymer (bottom right). Reprinted from Society.

cyclic polypeptoid brushes (top) and AFM corresponding donut-shape structures of left) and cyclic brushlike polymers (bottom ref 52. Copyright 2011 American Chemical

More recently, Schlaad et al. demonstrated the great potential of poly(N-propargylglycine) as a versatile platform for post-polymerization modification of polypeptoids (Scheme 10).53 The propargyl side chains were modified using various chemistries such as CuAAC and radical thiol−yne addition. Propargyl anions were produced by deprotonation of propargyl groups with a very strong non-nucleophilic phosphazene base (tBu-P4) and readily added to ethylene oxide. Besides CuAAC click reaction, the obtained triazole linkers were quaternized (to about 80%) with bromoethane yielding the first polypeptoidic ionic liquid. Furthermore, poly(N-propargylglycine) could be cross-linked by simple thermal treatment, through a yet unresolved mechanism, to yield an insoluble amorphous material.177 Kirshenbaum and co-workers prepared precisely functionalized peptoids by sequential CuAAC conjugation reaction on a solid support (Figure 9).178,179 This on-resin click approach was also applied to glycosylated peptoids for antifreeze applications.180 More recently, the group developed an elegant approach to couple therapeutics peptides or proteins with N1765


Chemical Reviews

Review

Scheme 10. Synthesis of Poly(N-propargylglycine) and Subsequent Modifications of Alkyne Side Chainsa

a

Adapted from ref 53. Copyright 2015 Elsevier Ltd.

Figure 9. Synthesis and sequential CuAAC modification of oligopeptoids. Reprinted with permission from ref 178. Copyright 2006 Royal Society of Chemistry.

side chains (i.e., n-propyl, allyl, and iso-propyl) could be welldissolved in water at 20−40 g L−1 and showed LCST behavior, whereas poly(N-propargylglycine) remained insoluble in water.49 The conflicting reports on the solubility of these polypeptoids can be attributed to the differential solubility of amorphous and semicrystalline samples. The cloud point temperatures (Tcp) were found to increase in the order of npropyl (15−25 °C) < allyl (27−54 °C) < iso-propyl (47−58 °C), depending on chain length and polymer concentration (classical Flory−Huggins type 1 behavior).188 The phase transitions were reversible only for shorter timescales. Longterm (days) annealing of dilute aqueous solutions (0.5 wt %) of poly(N-n-propylglycine) and poly(N-allylglycine) resulted in the formation of crystalline precipitate with complex morphology (see section 2.5.2.2). Furthermore, the cloud point temperatures can be adjusted using statistical copolymers comprising hydrophilic units,

terminal serine units to peptoids with C-terminal salicylaldehyde esters.181 2.5. Physico-Chemical Characteristics of Polypeptoids

2.5.1. Properties in Solution. 2.5.1.1. Thermoresponsive Solution Behavior. Some polypeptoids show lower critical solution behavior in aqueous solution (LCST = lower critical solution temperature), meaning that they are soluble in water at lower temperature and become insoluble at higher temperature, which they have in common with other polyamide structural isomers like poly(methacrylamide)s or poly(2-oxazoline)s.157,182−187 Peptoid homopolymers with methyl (C1, sarcosine) and ethyl (C2) side chains are readily soluble in water while all other polypeptoids with longer alkyl side chains (C3 and longer) were considered to be insoluble.43 Later, Schlaad and co-workers demonstrated that amorphous samples of polypeptoids with C3 1766


Chemical Reviews

Review

(sarcosine),191 and the double-hydrophilic poly(N-n-propylglycine])-block-poly(sarcosine).191 The latter system turns into an amphiphilic diblock copolypeptoid upon increasing the temperature to above the collapse temperature of the thermosensitive poly(N-n-propylglycine) block (see section 2.5.1.1) to induce micelle formation. Poly(N-alkyl urea peptoid)-graf t-[poly(styrene)-block-poly(acrylic acid)] (36-mer peptoid, Mn ∼ 76 kg/mol) formed particles of about 480 nm in diameter (DLS) in water at pH 8, where the carboxylic acid blocks in the side chains are deprotonated, thus hydrophilic. Particles were thought to be micelles, though a core−shell structure might be excluded by the very large size of the particles and the broad size distribution.192 Inverse micelles of 20−25 nm in size were formed by dialysis of dilute poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(sarcosine) solutions against 1,4-dioxane or ethyl acetate.69 The micelles in dioxane were irregular in shape while the ones in ethyl acetate were spherical, as evidenced by TEM (Figure 11). This was

usually sarcosine or N-ethylglycine, and hydrophobic units, usually butyl or higher alkyl chain substituted glycines, at various ratios. Examples include poly(sarcosine-co-N-butylglycine) with tunable cloud points in the range of 27−71 °C (at 0.3 wt % in water; sarcosine content increasing from 42 to 73 mol %)70,189 and poly(N-ethylglycine-co-N-butylglycine) 20− 60 °C (at 0.1 wt % in water).71 For the latter case, Zhang and co-workers found a distinct albeit little impact of the architecture (linear vs cyclic) on cloud point temperatures. The phase transition of the cyclic copolypeptoids was shifted to lower temperature as compared to the linear analogues with the same composition (and same concentration) (Figure 10). This

Figure 10. Cloud point temperatures of linear and cyclic poly(Nethylglycine-co-N-butylglycine) at 0.1 wt % in water as a function of the hydrophilic side chain content in mol %. Reprinted from ref 71. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society. Figure 11. TEM images of dried/collapsed micelles of poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(sarcosine) prepared in (A) dioxane and (B) ethyl acetate. Reprinted with permission from ref 69. Copyright 2014 John Wiley and Sons.

was explained in terms of lower entropic loss. Also, they found that the cloud point temperature decreased upon addition of sodium salts, the degree of depression being in line with the Hofmeister series (i.e., sulfate > chloride > iodide). A similar salting-in/out effect was also observed for poly(sarcosine-co-Nbutylglycine).189 Interestingly, polymer architecture seemed to have no impact on the cloud point temperature when comparing linear norbornyl-poly(N-ethylglycine-co-N-butylglycine) and poly(norbornene)-graf t-[poly(N-ethylglycine-co-N-butylglycine)] bottlebrushes (prepared by ring-opening metathesis polymerization, ROMP).72 However, the phase behavior was strongly dependent on the thermal history of the samples and the presence of inorganic salts. 2.5.1.2. Aggregation Behavior. Here, the aggregation behavior of block copolypeptoids in aqueous and organic solution and of lipopoymers will be addressed. The aggregation of peptoids will be discussed in detail in sections 3.2 to 3.4 (secondary to quaternary structures). Double-hydrophilic poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(sarcosine) in water was found to assemble into some small spherical particles of ∼20 nm in diameter (TEM) and unstable aggregates of >90 nm (as determined by dynamic light scattering, DLS).69 Furthermore, it was shown that the copolymer could act as a surfactant and stabilize organic (dichloromethane) droplets in aqueous solution to give stable emulsions. Droplets were larger in size (less curved) the larger the hydrophilic sarcosine weight fraction in the copolymer was. Spherical aggregates in dilute aqueous solution have also been observed for the amphiphilic poly(γ-benzyl-L-glutamate)block-poly(sarcosine),190 poly(N-propargylglycine)-block-poly-

attributed to different solubility parameters for the two blocks in the organic solvents. Interestingly, metal ion salts like copper(II)acetate and nickel(II)acetate could be loaded into the PSR core of the inverse micelles in ethyl acetate, as confirmed by TEM and UV spectroscopy. However, the metalloaded micelles showed great tendency toward cluster formation, as seen in TEM as well as in DLS (revealing a much larger particle size (>300 nm) and polydispersity). Double hydrophilic dextran-block-poly(sarcosine) was found to assemble into micron-sized giant polymer vesicles in water at a concentration of 25 wt %.193 Microphase separation occurs through balancing the osmotic pressure between the two hydrophilic phases containing different amounts of water (dextran binds more water molecules than PSR). Asymmetric poly(sarcosine)-block-poly(N-decylglycine) (100/9 units) were shown to undergo a sol−gel transition in methanol solution.194 The self-assembly process was driven by the crystallization of decyl side chains in the hydrophobic block, leading to a physically cross-linked fibrillar network (5−10 wt % polymer). Interestingly, cyclic polymers built stiffer gels than their linear analogous, as evidenced by rheology measurements, due to different degrees of crystallinity. Reversibility of the process could be shown by DSC and time-resolved WAXS revealing a gel−sol transition of around 60 °C coinciding with the melting of the decyl side chain crystals. Kimura and co-workers showed the self-assembly of poly(sarcosine)-peptide block copolymers (AB, A2B, and 1767


Chemical Reviews

Review

melting) (Table 1). The main chain melting of the uniform 15mer poly(N-butylglycine), prepared by solid-phase synthesis, was observed at 160 °C.206 The copolymer poly(sarcosine-coN-butylglycine) did not show any crystallization.70 For linear and cyclic polypeptoids bearing linear C4−14 side chains, Zhang et al. found that the side chain melting temperature increased while the main chain melting temperature decreased with increasing side chain length (Figure 12), suggesting that the two crystallization processes were coupled.47 This coupling was further supported by the observation that the main chain crystallization was significantly inhibited for polypeptoids with noncrystallizable ethyl or branched 2-ethylhexyl side chains. Also, the cyclic polymers exhibited higher main chain melting temperatures than the linear analogues, while the side chain melting temperature was not affected. Rosales et al. investigated the effects of structural “disturbances” (i.e., on the crystallization and thermal behavior of short sequence-specific mostly aliphatic peptoids).206 As such, this paper is a perfect example that the boundaries between polymer science and the classic sequence-specific peptoids become more and more blurry. Obviously, the perfect control is not possible with classic polymers. The peptoids investigated comprised exactly of 15 monomer units. With increasing the number of defects (2 or 4), the melting temperature were depressed or crystallization eventually abolished. Using a series of peptoid sequences with exactly 2 defects, the effect of the defect location was studied. Interestingly, the enthalpies of melting was affected quite significantly and varied from 35.5 to 58.3 J/g in the case of [Nisoamylglycine13-co-N-(2-methoxyethyl)glycine2]. The melting points varied from 174 to 166 °C, and the variation did not correlate with the variation in melting enthalpies.206 2.5.2.2. Solid-State Morphologies. Crystal structures of sequence-specific peptoids will be described in section 3.2. Here, semicrystalline solid-state morphologies of (poly)peptoids will be discussed. Such structures have been obtained by long-term annealing of dilute aqueous solutions of poly(N-npropylglycine) or poly(N-allylglycine). The formed precipitate was found to consist of crystalline microparticles having a rose bud type morphology as observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Figure 13) with melting points of 188− 198 °C and 157−165 °C (DSC), respectively.49 Segalman and co-workers studied AB diblock copolymers with a poly(styrene) segment and a sequence-specific peptoid comprising either 2-methoxyethyl side chains or 2-methoxyethyl/2-phenylethyl side chains.207 The first series of poly(styrene)-block-poly(peptoid) block copolymers readily selfassembled into hexagonally packed and lamellar morphologies, as evidenced by small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) in addition to DSC. In the second series, the presence of styrene-like units along the peptoid chain decreased segregation strength (i.e., increased compatibility) between the two blocks, thus preventing microphase separation leading to disordered structures. Balsara and co-workers presented a systematic study of the relationship between chemical structure and solid-state morphology of uniform comblike poly(N-2-(2-(2methoxyethoxy)ethoxy)ethylglycine)-block-poly(N-(2ethylhexyl)glycine) obtained by solid-phase synthesis.208 The number of monomers per chain was kept at 36, and the volume fraction (ϕ1) of the first block was varied from 0.11 to 0.65. All block copolymer samples, irrespective of the composition, were

(AB)8 type) in aqueous solution to give a plethora of nanostructures, including nanotubes of varying diameter and length, vesicles, and discs.195−202 Structure formation is all governed by the hydrophobic helical peptide block [D-/Lleucine-(2-aminoisobutyric acid)]n (n = 6−16), eventually in combination with stereo complexation (see section 3.4.3). Gervais and co-workers studied the self-assembly of lipopolymers of PSR with aliphatic chains ranging from C12 to C18, respectively using XPS.203,204 The degree of polymerization of the PSR block was varied from 1 to 91. For less than four units, sarcosine units were added in a stepwise manner. Depending on the PSR degree of polymerization, thin films cast from solvents exhibited lamellar, hexagonal, or body-centered cubic structures. Domain sizes ranged from a few Ångström to several nanometers. Liquid crystals of lipo(amino acids) were studied by Gallot and co-workers.205 Herein, the lipid part constituted alkyl chains of C12 to C18 and was modified with various amino acids (for example serine, alanine, and lysine) and sarcosine. It was reported that the liposarcosine only exhibited lamellar liquid crystalline states in the presence of a few percents of water. 2.5.2. Bulk Properties. 2.5.2.1. Thermal Properties. The glass transition temperatures (Tg) of polypeptoids with aliphatic side chains depend on the length of the main chain, as well as of the side chain. The Tg of PSR is highest with 127− 143 °C and is continuously decreasing for homologues with longer side chains.54 Tg values below room temperature were measured for poly(N-n-butylglycine) and poly(N-n-pentylglycine) by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) (Table 1). Polypeptoid samples were found to be thermally stable up to 200−250 °C, by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA).70 Table 1. Glass Transition and Melting Temperatures of (Poly)peptoids (Data Taken from Refs 39, 47, 54, and 206) (poly)peptoid Nalkyl C1: methyl C2: ethyl C3: n-propyl C3: iso-propyl C3: allyl C3: propargyl C4: n-butyl C5: n-pentyl C5: iso-amyl C6: n-hexyl C8: n-octyl C8: 2-ethylhexyl C10: n-decyl C12: n-dodecyl C14: n-tetradecyl N-aryl = C7: 2-phenylethyl

Tg (°C)

Tm,1 (°C) side chain

Tm,2 (°C) main chain

127−143 77−114 34−93 121 50−64 108 4 −5 to −3 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d.

n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a (−65) 63−70 49−67 n/a n.d. 53 n/a 72−79 84−90 100

n/a n/a 163−198 n/a 150−170 n/a 153−225 145−207 180 145−160 130−187 186 166−176 157−166 140

70

n/a

225

Peptoid homopolymers are amorphous or semicrystalline materials depending on the length of the side chain. PSR (C1) and poly(N-ethylglycine) (C2) are amorphous, while the higher homologues (linear C3 and longer) are semicrystalline. Poly(Nn-propylglycine) exhibits a single melting transition at Tm = 163−198 °C,49,54 while poly(N-n-butylglycine) and homologues with longer side chains exhibit two melting transitions at 49−79 °C (side chain melting) and at 130−225 °C (main chain 1768


Chemical Reviews

Review

Figure 12. DSC thermograms of cyclic (left) and linear (right) polypeptoid homopolymers during the second heating cycle (n = number of carbons on the alkyl side chain). Reprinted with permission from ref 47. Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society.

methoxyethoxy)ethoxy)ethylglycine) and poly(N-decylglycine)-block-poly(N-2-(2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy)ethylglycine) with 18 units per block also produce lamellar structures.210 Interestingly, the oligoether block can dissolve lithium ions and is amorphous in the first case (when bound to the amorphous poly(N-(2-ethylhexyl)glycine) block) but crystalline in the second case (when bound to the crystalline poly(N-decylglycine) block). Cyclic peptoid sequences have been shown to form supramolecular assemblies by coordinating sodium ions very similar to metal organic frameworks (MOFs).211 Hence, peptoids could be used as tunable linker for commonly used MOFs. Two out of three investigated molecules crystallized and showed different solid-state properties, despite minor differences in the molecular structure. In contrast, the third structure did not crystallize. A similar structure, which could be used for completely different applications, was described by Kirshenbaum and co-workers.212 By alternating pairs of cis- and transamide bonds in the backbone of a cyclic peptoid octamer, a selfassembling peptoid was obtained. Nanotubular crystal structures with associated water molecules were observed (Figure 14). Since diffusion of the water molecules through the nanotubes was indicated and the nanotubes could withstand temperatures of 300 °C, possible applications in the field of microelectronics, biosensors, or nanotechnology were suggested.

Figure 13. Scanning electron micrographs (of crystalline poly(N-npropylglycine) (left) and poly(N-allylglycine) (right), obtained by annealing of 0.5 wt % aqueous polymer solutions at 75 °C (60 h) or 70 °C (24 h), respectively. Adapted from ref 49. Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society.

found to assemble into a lamellar morphology, and the experimentally determined order−disorder transition (ODT) temperature exhibited a maximum at ϕ1 = 0.24, instead of 0.5 as expected from theory.209 The phase behavior of these peptoids is in disagreement with theories of microphase separation in block copolymers, which raises general questions about the roles of architecture and dispersity in the phase behavior of diblock copolymers. Similarly, ethyleneoxy-containing diblock copolypeptoids of poly(N-(2-ethylhexyl)glycine)-block-poly(N-2-(2-(21769


Chemical Reviews

Review

Figure 14. (a) Chemical structure of the cyclic peptoid octamer. View along the (b) and (c) axes of the crystal lattice (three peptoid oligomers are shown). Adapted with permission from ref 212. Copyright 2013 Royal Society of Chemistry.

3. INTRAMOLECULAR AND INTERMOLECULAR ASSEMBLY OF (POLY)PEPTOIDS Nature demonstrates its abilities in terms of complexity in the evolution of proteins: polypeptide/protein structures are highly diverse, functional, and hierarchical. In the search of alternatives that allow combining such complexity and functionality with synthetic chemical diversity, different strategies can be found in literature. Toward the formation of higher-order structures (e.g., tertiary and quaternary), one might have to control the building block (monomer) sequence itself, like nature does through the protein biosynthesis. Since the stepwise synthesis on the solid support (see section 2.2.1) is one of the very few synthetic ways to generate polymers with perfect sequence control, a small number of scientists have focused their work on the design of two- and three-dimensional peptoid structures mimicking patterns observed in nature. The synthetic strategies toward this goal are described in this chapter, starting from the control of the primary structures, over secondary structures like helices and sheets, which are the fundamental structure elements en route for synthetic proteins, and finally to tertiary and quaternary structures. 3.1. Controlling and Modifying the Primary Structure

Figure 15. Overview of different peptoid backbone variants. General structure of α-peptoids as a reference.

Controlling the primary structure of a polymer, or in other words, the exact sequence of monomer units is the key role for structures with hierarchical order. As described in section 2.2.1, Zuckermann et al. pioneered with the submonomer synthesis the field of sequence-defined peptoids.40 Besides the traditional α-peptoids and β-peptoids, efforts have been made to alternate the backbone to access additional conformations and properties. Different peptoid analogues, like urea peptoids,213,214 hydrazine azapeptoids,215 peptoid hydrazides,216 and aminoxy peptoids217 have been synthesized (Figure 15), although only with low molecular weights. However, most of those functional monomers are compatible with the standard procedure by Zuckermann et al. and could potentially be incorporated into the fully automated syntheses of larger polymers. Additionally, Kodadek et al. used a modified submonomer solid-phase synthesis to generate peptoids with side chains on the α-carbon and nitrogen atom in the backbone to give those polymers a peptide- and peptoid-like character.218 A very interesting modification to enhance the backbone variety was introduced by the Kodadek group by incorporating cyclic monomer units, such as thiazoles, oxazoles, and pyrazine residues (Figure 15).219 This variation introduces conformational constraint into the peptoids, which are usually more flexible than the analogous peptide sequences. The authors

could modify and optimize the submonomer solid-phase synthesis for their system in which they used heterocyclic halomethyl carboxylic acids as a reagent to create diverse oligomer libraries. The authors suggest that these libraries can be used to screen different biological targets to find structurally diverse ligands. More recently the same group also reported on the integration of 2-oxopiperazine into the peptoid backbone (Figure 15).220 In contrast to their former work, the heterocycles were not introduced as heterocyclic building blocks but rather formed on the solid support by intramolecular cyclization under basic conditions between the amine-functionalized side chain and the chloroacetylated N-terminus. Another approach to introduce more conformational constraint to enable new applications in molecular recognition and self-assembly is the cyclization of the linear chains themselves. Zhang et al. discovered the NHC-mediated polymerization of NNCAs to give polypeptoid macrocycles, and a few groups have worked on cyclization of peptoids either directly on solid support or after cleavage in solution (as discussed in section 2.4.1). Very recently, Kwon et al. synthesized equivalent structures in cyclic and linear form to study and compare directly their biological activity.136 Besides linear and cyclic structures, branched architectures like tripodands221 or dendrimers222,223 have been reported 1770


Chemical Reviews

Review

strated by fluorescence energy transfer studies.227 Therefore, specific synthetic strategies are necessary to favor one of these conformations depending on local intramolecular interactions to induce secondary structures. 3.2.1. Controlling cis/trans-Conformation. Early studies of Sisido et al.129 showed the solvent-dependent cis/transisomerization of the polypeptoid backbone and, much later, Sui et al.228 confirmed this isomerization and its energy barrier. Since, many groups set their aim toward the specific promotion of either cis or trans via steric or electronic effects of the side chain and/or interactions between side chain and backbone. In contrast to the works by Sisido et al. and Sui et al., which dealt with polypeptoids, the later studies were all performed with peptoids. It has been shown that peptoids with Cα-chiral substituents favor cis-conformation (Figure 17).229−231 Alternatively, cis-

(Figure 16). Wessjohann et al. showed with their multiple multicomponent assembly process toward peptide-peptoid

Figure 16. Example of a cholane-armed podand synthesized via Ugi multicomponent reaction, which exhibits a potential as a molecular umbrella for the transport of biomolecules across membranes. Reprinted with permission from ref 221. Copyright 2013 Wiley-VCH.

podands the possibility to cover a wide and diverse chemical range of podands and topologies in a highly modular one-pot approach that is even suitable for automation. Wessjohann pioneered the use of the Ugi-reaction to obtain peptoid-peptide hybrids. Interesting to note, the Ugi reaction has very recently also been applied to obtain peptide/peptoid hybrid polymers.224−226 These fill a unique niche, as they are sequencespecific but at the same time nonuniform in their chain length. Bradley and co-workers synthesized three generations of peptoid-based dendrimers via microwave-assisted solid-phase synthesis and proved the third generation compound as efficient mediator of transfection with minimal cytotoxicity.222 More recently, Bräse et al. used click chemistry to form rigidsoft nanostructures with aromatic cores and peptoid arms as the outer rim.223 The solubility of these products could be tuned by using different cores. Moreover, polymer brushlike structures have been prepared via functionalization of peptoid scaffolds.178 As described above, peptoid chains can be synthesized in a well-defined manner, which allows the control of the fundamental architectures in the form of linear, branched, or cyclic oligo- and polymers, to introduce hundreds of different side chains and even diverse molecules into the backbone. The possibility to place specific side chains into defined positions and distances from each other to form intra- and intermolecular interactions now gives rise to higher ordered structures. The possibility to combine this tight control over the primary structure with the polymerization on the solid-phase opens up unique possibilities in macro- and supramolecular engineering, which are yet to be explored.

Figure 17. Demonstration of the two different conformational states of the amide bond in the peptoid backbone, cis and trans. The arrow indicate the stabilizing n → π*Ar and n → π*co interactions for the cis- and trans-conformation, respectively. Below, the residues that induce the corresponding conformation are pictured: bulky aromatic (and tert-butyl, not shown) for cis and aryl, hydroxyl, and alkoxy for trans.

conformation can be provoked by purely steric effects (e.g., by introducing tert-butyl side chains)232 or by incorporating aromatic side chains that lead to favorable interactions between their substituent electron orbitals and the orbitals of the backbone. This was possible by the use of N-α-chiral acetanilide or N-1-naphtylethyl substituents due to n → π*co and hydrogen bonding, or n → π*Ar and steric interactions, respectively (Table 2).233 Remarkably, the cis-conformation could only be found in polar solvents, while nonpolar solvents favored the trans-conformation. This could be an interesting approach toward structures that can fold depending on their environment. For positively charged α-chiral methylpyridine side chains, 89% of the amide bonds were found to be in cisconformation. Further studies characterized the n → π*Ar stabilization in detail and distinguished between this and a newly described “bridged n → π*Ar” interaction.234 Here, an electron density transfer from the amide to the aromatic ring takes place, and this transfer is enabled by an intermediary δ* orbital. It was shown by theory and experiment that this interaction appears to be most significant for electron-rich, neutral, and moderately electron-poor aromatic side chains. Computational analysis predicted that electron-deficient

3.2. Mimicking Secondary Structures

Secondary structures in proteins are well-described and have been successfully predicted after Pauling, Corey, and Branson developed a model for peptide α-helices in 1951.240 Further investigations showed that most homopolymers of natural amino acids tend to form either α-helices or β-sheets.23 Homopolymers of sarcosine, on the other hand, exhibit a disordered random coil formation in water41 and are also soluble in a wide range of organic solvents.43 In contrast to (poly)peptides, the backbone of (poly)peptoids is inherently flexible and does not favor cis- or transconformation of the amide bond,129 whereas most of the peptide structures feature predominantly the trans-conformation. Moreover, PSR chains are very flexible (more so than oligo-proline chains) in (ethanolic) solution, as was demon1771


Chemical Reviews

Review

Table 2. Kcis/trans Values for Different α-Chiral Aromatic Side Chains, As Determined By 1H−COSY and HSQCAD NMR in CD3CN at 24 °C (Data Taken from Refs 233, 247, and 253)

a

Weighted average of Kcis/trans for all residues. bMeasured at 25 °C.

Figure 18. Predicted helical structure of N-(1-phenylethyl)glycine octamer peptoid viewed (a) parallel and (b) perpendicular to the long axis of the PPI-like helix. Peptoid backbone atoms are color-coded (green, carbon; gray, hydrogen; red, oxygen; blue, nitrogen); side chain atoms are depicted in yellow. Adapted from ref 229. Copyright 1997 Elsevier Ltd.

aromatic side chains would stabilize the cis-conformation of the amide bond rather by the direct n → π*Ar interaction. Combining chemical synthesis, NMR spectroscopy, and Xray crystallography, Olsen and co-workers investigated the effect of thioamides and/or fluorides in peptoid monomer model systems.235 They described the steric environment of the amide bond as key promoter of conformational orientations. Most interestingly, their results of X-ray crystallography indicate that stabilizing n → π*co interactions only occur when carbonyls were altered electronically by thioamide formation or α-halogenation. Further, the authors suggest that these backbone alterations may be used to stabilize

secondary formations such as poly(L-proline) type I helices (PPI, see next section 3.2.2). Trans-amide conformation is favored by aryl substituents that are directly bound to the nitrogen atom in the backbone.236 Shah et al. synthesized peptoids comprising two to six monomer units and evaluated the relative energies of cis- and trans-amide bonds by computational methods. It was shown that a broad set of aryl substituents were tolerated for the energetic preference for trans-amide bond conformers. Solution NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography of these N-aryl peptoids confirmed the preference of the amide bonds in the backbone toward the trans-conformation. 1772


Chemical Reviews

Review

Figure 19. Predicted helical structure of N-phenylglycine peptoid hexamer viewed (a) parallel and (b) perpendicular to the long axis of the PPII-like helix. Atoms are color-coded (gray, carbon; white, hydrogen; red, oxygen; blue, nitrogen). Adapted from ref 236. Copyright 2008 American Chemical Society.

Besides the mentioned aryl substituents, hydroxyl, and alkoxy substituents lead to the preference of trans-amide conformation as well.237,238 Jordan et al. recapitulated their experimental investigations with quantum mechanics calculations and studied the backbone and side chain torsional energies. Further, they could show via circular dichroism and NMR spectroscopy that longer peptoids preserve the overall order of the dimer. Upon the basis of these results, they designed a model of the secondary structure, which is formed by an N-alkoxy peptoid. Interestingly, the resulting poly(L-proline) type II helix (PPII, see next section 3.2.2) demonstrates a resemblance to the above-mentioned N-aryl peptoids. In contrast to this, Nhydroxy amide side chains promote sheetlike structures, which will be discussed in section 3.2.3. 3.2.2. Helices: Multifaceted Structural Elements. Helices are very common secondary structures in proteins, were the first to be discovered and represent the most intensively investigated motifs besides β-sheets.239,240 In peptides, such structures are stabilized through hydrogen bonds. However, poly(L-proline) has been known for many years to form two distinct types of helices, so-called poly(Lproline) type I helix (PPI) and poly(L-proline) type II helix (PPII).2,241,242 Therefore, it was interesting when first circular dichroism (CD) spectra showed that peptoids bearing Cα-chiral side chains exhibit similar curves like α-helices with a double peak at 203 and 220 nm.243 This data was later supported by computational studies that suggested the formation of helices similar to PPI (Figure 18), with a pitch of approximately 6 Å and a periodicity of three residues per turn.229 Moreover, the asymmetric Ramachandran-like plots that have been shown in this work indicate that the handedness of the helix can be controlled by the handedness of the side chains. Initial and systematical investigations by Barron and coworkers examined the dependence of the helix stability of a monomer sequence using chiral aromatic side chains.244,245 Peptides comprising helicogenic amino acids form initially βsheets (number of repeat units, DP ≤ 10) before they form helical structures.23,246 In contrast, helices formed by heliogenic peptoids can be found for oligomers as short as five monomer units.244,245 Its stability increases up to a DP of 15. A minimum of 50% Cα-chiral side chains are necessary to form stable helices as well as a chiral aromatic side chain at the C-terminus. Astonishingly, those helices were stable up to 75 °C, and the impact of the described requirements became less important with increasing chain length. Interestingly, a similar stability was found for water-soluble helices of chiral poly(2-oxazoline)s.39

Further studies showed that aromatic residues are not necessarily required to form helices.247 In this work, Baron and co-workers showed the first crystal structure of a peptoid helix with a pitch of approximate 6.7 Å, three residues per turn, and a left-handedness which is comparable to PPI. Recently, Seo et al. could verify the importance of a chiral aromatic side chain at the C-terminus and pointed out that a α-chiral residue at the second position from the N-terminus has a major impact on the formation of secondary structures as well.248 They investigated peptoid heptamers and described the “existence of lynchpin-like structure-inducing positions” and positions in the sequence that are uninfluential (i.e., the first, fourth, and sixth positions from the N-terminus). Interestingly, they could induce helices with only one α-chiral residue at the second position from the N-terminus. This work shows the tremendous importance of sequence control to form secondary and, in perspective, protein-like structures, which makes the submonomer solid-phase synthesis an indispensable tool on this route toward synthetic biology or defined functional material. Remarkably, in 1963 Fasman and Blout made a similar observation, that 50% chiral monomer units are necessary to obtain helices when copolymerizing L-proline (helicogenic) and sarcosine (nonhelicogenic), which leads obviously to nonuniform polypeptoids.249 Later, similar helices were also described for homopolymers obtained by NHC-catalyzed ROP of NNCA.250 In our opinion, this can be seen as a nice demonstration of the blurred borders between peptoid design and supra- and macromolecular engineering with polypeptoids. Since peptoid helices cannot be stabilized by hydrogen bonding via the backbone, mixed impressions about their stability can be found in literature. It was shown that the peptoid helices are stable against most denaturants (e.g., urea and temperature),251 but conformational stability is typically less than that of peptide α-helices. This is marked by low Kcis/trans values and rather short persistence lengths.244 Depending on the chain length, values range between 1 and 4 nm for peptoid helices. SANS studies indicate that the persistence lengths of helices induced by bulky α-chiral 1-phenylethyl side chains were only longer for short sequences and showed almost no difference for longer ones compared to peptoids with the same number of monomer units but achiral phenethyl side chains.252 However, due to these rather short persistence lengths, the authors suggest that the polymer chains maintain considerable conformational freedom. Incorporation of bulky residues stabilizes these helices sterically233,253 and especially a N-1-naphtylethyl side chain leads to high Kcis/trans values 1773


Chemical Reviews

Review

Figure 20. Structure of Rhodamine B-labeled peptoid and its structure assembly as obtained by a QM/MM (quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics) refinement using a COSMOS-NMR force field that forms an extended helix formation. 1H−13C-HSQC spectrum in 90% H2O/10% D2O depicted on top of the arrow. Reprinted with permission from ref 262. Copyright 2013 Royal Society of Chemistry.

biological activity, which was shown by the cellular uptake of the peptoid, was similar to other cell-penetrating peptides. Kang et al. used peptoid helices as scaffolds to precisely control the orientation of porphyrins. In this manner, they investigated cofacial, slipped-cofacial, and unstructured array of porphyrins and showed that the distance, orientation, and number of the porphyrin-peptoid conjugates had a huge impact on the degree of J-aggregation, resulting in color and excitonic coupling.263 The authors speculate that these structures might be interesting for the design of artificial photosynthetic complexes. Olsen and co-workers were very recently the first to report on stable helical structures designed by β-peptoids (Figure 21).264 X-ray crystal structures of β-peptoid hexamers

without affecting the overall helix structure (Table 2). As discussed in the previous chapter, N-aryl residues promote a trans-conformation in peptoids. Kirshenbaum and co-workers applied N-phenylglycine monomer units in a peptoid hexamer and confirmed the predicted structure of PPII-like helices (Figure 19).236 Additionally, approaches to functionalize peptoid helices have been reported to either modify the solubility, promote formation of higher-order structures, to generate a pHresponsive conformational change, or to further improve their stability.134,254−257 Also 4-azidoproline, as intermediate between peptides and peptoids, was used by Wennemers and colleagues to form helices.258 Interestingly, while the 4Renantiomer stabilizes PPII, its 4S-enantiomer destabilizes it. Kirshenbaum et al. introduced alkyne and azide groups at i and i+3 positions of helicogenic sequences to stabilize helical structures even in short oligomers after “clicking” both side chains (Figure 5b).134 Remarkably, in this manner, the synthesized cyclic peptoid sequences yielded more intense circular dichroism spectra as compared to their linear pendants, suggesting more stable helices. Similar differences in stability were found for cyclic and linear polymers.250 Although, less helicogenic residues have to be incorporated via this approach, at least two modified building blocks are needed to stabilize the helix. A different approach to incorporate functionalities was described by Zuckermann et al.257 They introduced 1phenylethyl residues with functional groups (thiols, carboxylic acids, and amides) in the para-position of the phenyl ring, which localizes them at the outer perimeter of the formed helices. This allows for the mimicking of the interactions between helix bundles in proteins and α-helices in coiled coils.259−261 In order to generate cell-penetrating structures, Bräse, Muhle-Goll, and co-workers incorporated butylamine as lysinelike residues into peptoids and revealed an extended pseudohelical structure via quantum chemical calculations and NMR spectroscopy (Figure 20).262 This extended helix with a pitch of 7.7 Å was explained by electrostatic repulsion between the side chains to maximize the spacing of the ammonium groups. The amide bonds in the backbone were found to be predominantly in cis-conformation and the charge distribution less dense compared to peptide analogues. However, the

Figure 21. Helical structure of (a) N-(S)-1-(1-naphthyl)ethyl βpeptoid hexamer. (b) End view shown as stick representation. (c) Side view of the X-ray crystal structure shown in light gray and the conformation after 1 μs MD simulation shown in blue. Only the backbones are shown as sticks to highlight the similarity. Reprinted with permission from ref 264. Copyright 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. 1774


Chemical Reviews

Review

Figure 22. (a) Peptoids that form intermolecular β-sheet-like structures. (b) Partial 1H NMR and ROESY spectra [blue arrows point to the observable minor conformational peaks, and the red boxes highlight a weak ROE between the NT-H and ac1-Hα backbone protons (right box), as well as the absence of an observed ROE between the ac1-Hα and ac2-Hα backbone protons (left box)]; (c) X-ray crystal structure depicting five molecules of the peptoid in a sheetlike hydrogen-bonded network. The solid green lines indicate H bonds, and the black dashed line indicates the intermolecular ac1-Cα-ac2-Cα distance. Reprinted from ref 238. Copyright 2011 American Chemical Society.

Figure 23. Peptoid ribbon structure. (a) An ensemble of ten superimposed low-energy structures of a ribbon forming peptoid hexamer as determined by NMR spectroscopy. (b) Axial view down the N-terminus showing the left-handed spiral of this ribbon conformation. Reprinted with permission from ref 268. Copyright 2013 Wiley-VCH.

containing N-(S)-1-(1-naphthyl)ethyl side chains revealed a right-handed helical conformation with a helical pitch of 9.6− 9.8 Å and 3 residues per turn. Further, molecular dynamics simulations support those stabilized secondary structures in organic solvents. 3.2.3. Sheet, Ribbon, Turn, and Loop. Besides α-helices other predominant structure elements in proteins are β-sheets. Blackwell and co-workers demonstrated that peptoid dimers with N-hydroxy amide side chains could be crystallized, and the X-ray crystallographic data exhibits sheetlike structures (Figure 22).238 On top of the fact that the employed side chains promote trans-conformation of the amide bond, they are also prone to hydrogen bonding, which both were found to be necessary for sheet formation in proteins.265 Although, they suggested that incorporating N-hydroxy amides into longer peptoids may lead to the formation of peptoid β-sheets, the synthesis of such sheets consisting of only one individual chain has not been reported. Zuckermann and co-workers could also show sheetlike structures within the structure of their two-

dimensional crystalline nanosheets, which will be discussed in more detail in section 3.4.1.266 Interestingly, powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis revealed a spacing between the peptoid chains of 4.5 Å, which is close to the commonly found 4.7 Å in peptide β-sheets.267 Recently, Blackwell and co-workers designed a peptoid ribbon structure.268 Ribbons can also be found in proteins and could function as antibiotics or cell-membrane modifying agents. The peptoid structure was realized by alternating bulky α-chiral naphthyl- and N-arylglycine residues and therefore alternating cis- and trans-conformation of the amide bond, respectively (Figure 23). Similar to peptide ribbons, it exhibits a helical conformation parallel to the backbone with a helical rotation of 36°. Interestingly, n → π*co interactions, which usually play a significant role in helical conformations, are not important for the formation of this structure. The stability of the ribbon in polar and protic solvents could be shown by circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy studies in methanol and acetonitrile/water mixture. The backbone of the ribbon can be 1775


Chemical Reviews

Review

Figure 24. As evidenced by (a) CD spectroscopy, the secondary structure of N-1-phenylethylglycine oligomers depends strongly on the number of repeat units. Whereas Nspe6 and Nspe12 form helical structures, Nspe9 forms a (b) loop as depicted in a cross-eyed stereographic view of the ensemble of 20 NMR structures following a best-fit superposition of the backbone atoms. Reprinted from ref 278. Copyright 2006 American Chemical Society.

Figure 25. Energy landscapes for a trans-sarcosine dipeptoid in vacuum from quantum mechanics (left) and simulations of the force field (right) demonstrate the accuracy of the latter. Reprinted with permission from ref 288. Copyright 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

pictured as sequence of turns, which is also observed in peptide ribbons.269 In fact, turns are, just as loops, another fundamental structure element in proteins,270−275 and being able to mimic those structures would be an important step toward the synthesis of proteinlike assemblies. In the two different approaches to realize a single turn in a peptoid sequence, it was necessary to alter the backbone itself.276,277 Apella and co-workers introduced a triazole ring that induces a hairpinlike motif, which was also confirmed in aqueous solution.277 Blackwell and co-workers on the other hand attached a monomer unit that was able to form hydrogen bonds onto the side chain of a tripeptoid.276 With this, however, one may argue that unique character of peptoid-based structures (i.e., the nonhydrogen bonding) is lost to some degree. Moreover, Barron, Radhakrishnan, and co-workers reported on a peptoid sequence that forms a so-called threaded loop structure.278 In this study, 1-phenylethyl (Nspe) residues were employed, which were earlier discussed as helicogenic side chains. The interesting fact is that upon increasing the chain length from 6 to 9 units, the CD spectra suggest a change from a helix to a loop structure. Prolonging the chain even further to 12 monomer units indicated again a helical structure (CD) (Figure 24). Astonishingly, instead of an expected all-cis-

conformation, the nonamer features four amide bonds with trans-conformation. Yet, hydrogen bonding is the main driving force to form the loop, which stands, similar to one of the turns, in contrast to the typical peptoid secondary structures without hydrogen bonding. Interestingly, these structures can be destabilized by hydrogen-bonding solvent, which offers the possibility to create a structural building block that can respond to changes in its environment (e.g., solvent or another peptide). Later, Gorske and Blackwell reported a different folding behavior by introducing fluorinated aromatic residues. They demonstrated that only one monomer unit of a 1pentafluorophenylethyl at the N-terminus of a peptoid nonamer stabilizes the loop and that the addition of methanol (protic solvent) did not significantly affected the loop structure.254 A few years later, Blackwell et al. showed the major impact toward the formation of secondary structures of small changes in the monomer sequence.279 A single 1(nitrophenyl)ethyl moiety at the N-terminus of a peptoid octamer of Nspe was introduced. Remarkably, the threaded loop was either destabilized or stabilized depending just on the position of the nitro group (2- or 4-position at the phenyl ring, respectively). Besides, first studies to exploit secondary structures for applications have been reported: 2,2,6,6tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO) was incorporated into 1776


Chemical Reviews

Review

Figure 26. (a) Protein-like and repeating sequence of peptoid 100-mers. Using molecular dynamics, proteinlike peptoid sequences were obtained by iterative process of globule formation and addition/redistribution of polar residues on the globule surface. (b) Globule-to-coil transition was induced by titration with acetonitrile, which leads to unfolding of the globules. (c) The transition is more pronounced and sharper in the case of the proteinlike sequence. Reprinted from ref 298. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society.

and the overall structure was described as pseudohelical. However, a full characterization of the three-dimensional structure via this semitheoretical approach was not possible. In contrast to this, Bonneau and co-workers added the peptoid backbone to the Rosetta platform, which is usually used for protein modeling, to allow for complete theoretical simulations of peptoid structures.289 Together with Kirshenbaum and coworkers, they used this option to generate an in silico library of peptoid foldamers with over 50 different side chains.290 Nandel et al. simulated different peptoid structures and showed that a sequence, which favors cis-amide bond geometry can adopt degenerate conformations with alternate dihedral angles (φ, ψ values) of inverse-PPI and PPI type helices or vice versa in water and also inverse-PPI structures in DMSO.291 They also modeled a sequence with alternating trans- and cisamide bond geometry which lead to inverse-PPII and PPII type helices depending on the incorporated side chains. Higher-order structures are important for catalytic activity in enzymes. Therefore, researchers did not stop attempting to mimic secondary, but also tertiary and quaternary structures. The next section will show, that in a few instances, those efforts have already proved successful. Very recently, Whitelam et al. also used theoretical modeling to investigate time-dependent interactions of peptoid chains that can assemble into nanosheets (will be discussed in section 3.4.1).292 Via coarse-grained sites to model peptoids, they were interested in elucidating the fundamental interactions that are necessary for supramolecular assembly. The authors plan to use this model for further investigations of large-scale dynamic processes, which are involved in the preparation cycle of these peptoid nanosheets.

a peptoid heptamer, which showed a promising potential for enantioselective catalytic transformations.280 β-Peptoids are also known to form secondary structures.98,281−285 However, the solubility of the β-peptoids seems to be, here again, the limiting factor, and one may hypothesize that the formation of secondary structures is just a contributing factor to this poor solubility. Yet, this remains to be elucidated. 3.2.4. Computational Modeling. Although, research in the field of peptoid-based secondary structures has made significant advantages over the last years, a lot of issues are still unsolved. Within all the different side chains, configurations, and conformations of peptoids that have been discussed above and the further possibilities that remain to be described, the variety seems infinite. However, since resources are limited in laboratories, computational modeling has been a promising and helpful tool for rapid and cost-effective screenings of designs and discoveries of new sequences and brings therefore synthetic peptoid-based materials one step closer toward biological polymers. After early approaches via Rachmandran-type plots that indicated the great conformational diversity of the peptoid backbone,89 molecular mechanics calculations indicated the impact of the side chains on the backbone conformation229 and on the dihedral angles.286 The first de novo structure prediction was presented in 2012.287 More recently, Mirijanian et al. used a different approach via a first-generation atomistic force field for their simulations of the peptoid backbone.288 On the basis of a CHARMM simulation force field of peptides, a method to demonstrate the solvation effect of water toward the conformations of a sarcosine dipeptoid was developed (Figure 25). Although these modeling studies only consider small molecules, the authors suggest that similar to peptide and protein modeling, the modeling progress will advance rapidly within the next years toward more complex structures. Bräse and Muhle-Goll used COSMOS-NMR to model structures without specific force fields.262 The amide bonds of a labeled cell-penetrating hexamer peptoid were found to be in all cis-conformation,

3.3. Mimicking Tertiary Structures

The term tertiary structure in proteins refers to the threedimensional assembly of one single polypeptide chain into its protein domains, which can comprise one or more secondary structures and is therefore critically determined by its primary sequence. This section will discuss efforts that have been made to mimic such tertiary structures with peptoids. 1777


Chemical Reviews

Review

Figure 27. Schematic illustration of the formation of the two-helix “bundle” by adding zinc ions. Reprinted with permission from ref 301. Copyright 2008 American Chemical Society.

Figure 28. Nanosheets formed from single-chain peptoid sequences. (a) Alternating charge and (b) block charge sequences is essential (color-code: yellow, carbon; red, oxygen; blue, nitrogen). Imaging of morphology of (c) alternating charge sheets by fluorescence optical microscopy and of (d) block charge sheets by scanning electron microscopy. Reprinted with permission from ref 303. Copyright 2011 Wiley-Blackwell.

1778


Chemical Reviews

Review

3.4.1. Peptoid Nanosheets. Very intriguing quaternary structures of peptoids are the so-called nanosheets (Figure 28), two-dimensional crystals, prepared and intensively investigated by Zuckermann and co-workers.266 Those sheets are formed by combining peptoid chains (e.g., 36-mers) with alternating cationic/hydrophobic and anionic/hydrophobic residues, respectively. Mixing peptoids with the same architecture but opposite charge leads initially to the formation of globular aggregates. Interestingly, after a few hours, large but ultrathin sheets with a thickness of 27 Å are formed in high yields. Aberration-corrected transmission electron microscopy evidenced that the polymer chains were highly extended within this structure. These first studies were followed by an approach that highlighted the enormous aspect ratio and relatively simple and straightforward preparation of those sheets by mixing and rocking of the peptoid solutions,302 where the sheets are formed via compression of the peptoid monolayer at the air− water interface. Interestingly, incorporating the two different functionalities in a block-wise or alternating manner into one polymer chain, does also lead to similar sheet formation,303 as long as the hydrophobic and ionic side chains were strictly alternating. Since the aggregation of those chains is dependent on hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions, the sheet formation itself depends on the solution pH. Thus, organic solvents can disturb the hydrophobic interactions and lead to destruction of the sheets. Further studies concentrated on the formation of nanosheets at the interface between water and hydrophobic solvents.304 Here, the formation of peptoid nanosheets at the interface of water and pentane, hexane, or heptane could be shown but not at the interface with more viscous (decane and mineral oil) or aromatic solvents (benzene and toluene). Carbon tetrachloride was shown as another solvent promoting the formation of sheets, albeit much smaller ones. The authors suggest interactions between the solvent and the peptoid chains, which influence the collapse into the nanosheets. To gain more insight into the mechanism of the sheet formation, Sanii et al. studied the packing and organization of the peptoid chains and discovered that this takes place during the formation of the monolayer at the water−air surface, prior to the collapse into its bilayer.305 Grazing-incidence X-ray scattering revealed this monolayer exhibits a well-defined structure. As discussed above (see section 3.2.4), coarse-grained models were used for a further understanding of the conformation and behavior of the backbone and side chains within the nanosheets.292 Zuckermann and co-workers already showed in their first studies the possibility of incorporating functionalities into peptoid nanosheets.266 A streptavidin binding peptide was introduced at the N-terminus of the peptoid chains and after the assembling into sheets, they were bound to a streptavidinfluorophore conjugate. Later, they continued this work and were able to incorporate enzyme substrates and gold ligands into the sheets.306 These introduced functionalities are forming loops, which are extending from the plane of the bilayer, and were characterized in a Langmuir trough by X-ray reflectivity. It was shown that the protease labile loops could be cleaved by proteases, loops bearing substrates for kinases were phosphorylated thereby, and the gold ligand loops could be used as template for the growth of gold directly on the nanosheet surface. These studies demonstrate the possibility to rationally design and create three-dimensional architectures that are

3.3.1. Globular Structures. In proteins, hydrophobic interactions are an important driving force in the folding of the polypeptides.293−297 Zuckermann et al. studied this chain collapse, the coil-to-globule transition, of peptoid 100-mers and were able to identify its main cause on the folding as hydrophobic effects and rule out any hydrogen bonding and secondary structures.298 Two different monomer sequences of peptoids with ionic and nonionic monomer units were investigated (Figure 26). One had a regular distribution of the two repeating units and the other consisted of blocks of each residue, designed as “protein-like” using models described by Khokhlov and Khalatur.299 When investigating the coil-toglobule transition, SAXS and dye incorporation revealed that this proteinlike sequence collapses to a more compact globule. Further, the collapse occurred in a smaller window of solvent composition, giving an additional indication of a decreased stability for the repeating structure. 3.3.2. Multihelical Bundles. Another important tertiary structure in transmembrane proteins are bundles of helices. In a combinatorial approach, Zuckermann and co-workers screened through 3400 different 15-mer peptoids in a search for the capability to form aggregates of helices.109 Again, the hydrophobic collapse of the peptoids played the major role in the formation of those bundles. For this concept, every third side chain was a unit chosen from a pool of 12 different hydrophobic residues while the remaining monomer units were hydrophilic. The outer surface of the resulting amphiphilic helices exhibit hydrophobic and hydrophilic areas (approximately one-third to one-half). A fluorescence assay was used to mark hits (only about 3% of the prepared samples were considered a hit). Later, the same group continued this work by linking those helices covalently together.300 Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) quenching, via attached fluorophores to each end of the peptoids, was used as detection of the desired hydrophobic collapse. Upon titration with several solvents, a cooperative disassembly was observed without destroying the helical structure. One step closer toward synthetic proteins was realized by this group by introducing a thiol and an imidazole moiety into a two-helix “bundle” as a zinc-binding site to resemble the function of a zinc finger (Figure 27).301 Variation of the position of those residues showed a huge effect on the zinc affinity, with apparent kd values differing by several orders of magnitude. Interestingly, the addition of zinc did not induce a perceptible effect on the helical peptoid structure and after the metal-bound was formed, the addition of acetonitrile did not lead to the unfolding of the structure. To complete these different hierarchical layers of molecular structures of peptoids, the final subsection will discuss quaternary structures. 3.4. Mimicking Quaternary Structures

We should clarify that from a biological point of view, one may note that quaternary structures are more or less exactly defined supramolecular assemblies of multiple folded proteins. However, we shall not be that strict in this Review and simply determine quaternary (poly)peptoid structures as supramolecular assemblies of multiple (poly)peptoid (macro)molecules in an ordered/hierarchical manner. In this definition, we excluded comparably unordered micellar structures from this section, as they have been discussed earlier, see section 2.5.1.2. 1779


Chemical Reviews

Review

they combined a stepwise synthesis (SPPS) to generate the hydrophobic peptide block (six alternating repeats of leucine and 2-aminoisobutyric acid) with the NuLROP of sarcosineNCA to form the hydrophilic PSR block. Two different lengths of PSR were investigated, DP = 10 and 27. The polymer with the longer block resulted in very homogeneous nanotubes (Figure 30a). Upon adding the polymer with the shorter hydrophilic block, Y-junctions were formed. When polymers with identical composition but different chirality (from the leucine) were added, the tubes formed stereocomplexes upon heating and eventually merged into spherical assemblies.197 In further investigations, the same group gave evidence that the ratio of the length of the different blocks of different chirality have a major impact on the curvature of the formed nanotubes.196 Kimura et al. also used these amphiphilic polymers with opposite chirality to form nanoassemblies with shapes of roundbottom flasks upon heat treatment (Figure 30b).198,200 More recently, further structural elements were introduced. Two PSR chains and two histidine units were added to the previously used molecules. Together, all three building blocks are now able to connect, in a so-called “patchwork self-assembly technique”, the nanotubes with spherical structures to form stimuli-responsive Janus-type assemblies with the shape of stoppered round-bottom flasks (Figure 30c) stoppered flasks.308 Histidines as building blocks lead to pH sensitive aggregation behavior of the polymers. This was demonstrated to allow control over the assembly morphology, just by varying the solution pH, ranging from a twisted ribbon, over a helical ribbon, to nanotubes.309 3.4.4. Amylin-Like Structures, Microspheres, and Worm-Like Micelles. Peptoid structures that mimic amylin(20−29), which is associated with Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and type II diabetes, have been synthesized by transforming a highly amyloidogenic peptide sequence into its corresponding peptoid and retro-peptoid sequence (Figure 31a).310 While the peptoid sequence did not form amyloid fibrils or any other secondary structures, the retro-peptoid sequence did assemble into supramolecular structures, comparable to ribbons or tapes, although not into amyloid fibrils. Moreover, the peptoid sequence was able to inhibit amyloid formation of native amylin(20−29) for at least 4 days. Servoss and co-workers used peptoids to form microspheres (diameter ∼0.3−3 μm) that could be interesting structures for applications in drug delivery or sensing (Figure 31b).311,312 Their methodical study showed the importance of the partial water solubility and helical content toward the formation of

capable of specific functions from linear, information-rich polymer chains. 3.4.2. Peptoid Superhelices. According to our definition of quaternary structures, superhelices or coiled-coils are other important motifs, which are present in proteins and nucleic acids (e.g., collagen fibrils). Such superhelices have also been generated via self-assembly of peptoids.307 Murnen et al. used the same monomer units that were utilized for sheet formation (as described above) but arranged those as diblock copeptoids rather than in an alternating sequence. Here, the peptoids were dissolved in the absence of peptoids with complementary charge. Interestingly, at first, sheet formation was observed upon dissolution in water at a concentration of 0.1 mM. However, after several days, superhelical structures with a diameter of 624 ± 69 nm and a length of up to 40 μm (Figure 29) were formed.

Figure 29. Atomic force microscopy scan of a superhelix formed from a sequence-specific 30-mer diblock with hydrophobic and anionic moieties (inset). Reprinted with permission from ref 37. Copyright 2013 Springer.

Once formed, they were stable in solution for months. Although the individual building blocks were achiral, the observed helices were homochiral. Different sequences did not result in any defined structures. Another essential condition for the successful formation of the superhelices is the optimal balance between charge repulsion and water solubility, which was found to be at 50−70% of deprotonated carboxylates. 3.4.3. Nanotubes and Round-Bottom Flasks. Selfassembly of amphiphilic polypeptoid-peptide hybrid block copolymers into discrete shapes was the topic in a series of papers by Kimura and co-workers.195 Synthetically interesting,

Figure 30. TEM images of (a) a mixture of the amphiphilic peptoid-peptide hybrid block copolymers, (b) round-bottom flask-shaped assembly prepared from the nanotubes and sheets with heat treatment. (c) Sealing of the flasks was achieved by adding planar sheet dispersion into the preprepared round-bottom flask to form dumbbell-type conjugate morphologies. Reprinted with permission from ref 195. Copyright 2008 WileyVCH. Reprinted with permission from ref 200 and 308. Copyright 2013 and 2015 Royal Society of Chemistry. 1780


Chemical Reviews

Review

Figure 31. (a) TEM images of an aggregate of supramolecular ribbons and tapes of the retro-peptoid sequence. Reprinted with permission from ref 310. Copyright 2007 Elsevier Ltd. (b) SEM image of microspheres with a diameter of (3.2 ± 1.6) μm. Reprinted with permission from ref 311. Copyright 2013 Royal Society of Chemistry. (c) Cryo-TEM images obtained from dilute methanol solutions of the cyclic block copolypeptoid after 15 days. Reprinted with permission from ref 313. Copyright 2011 American Chemical Society.

microspheres.311 They could demonstrate that variation in a single residue could make the difference between the formation of well-defined microspheres and no assembly at all. Moreover, changing the side chains by means of bulkiness and placement of the charge had a huge impact on the size of the resulting microspheres. In additional work, they demonstrated the coating of glass and silicon substrates with these microspheres,312 which could be interesting for ligand presentation or to prevent fouling. While investigating the differences between cyclic and linear nonionic amphiphilic copolypeptoids (of PSR and Ndecylglycine), Zhang and co-workers found an interesting effect in their self-assembling behavior.313 To begin, spherical micelles formed in methanolic or aqueous solution/suspension. However, after a few days, both polymers eventually evolved into cylindrical (wormlike) micelles that exhibit a diameter of only a few nanometers but several micrometers in length (Figure 31c). The previous sections tried to show and discuss the versatility of (poly)peptoids as materials platform. The possibilities of stepwise synthesis and polymerization appear endless and a lot of potential remains untapped. However, numerous hierarchical structures and self-assemblies are already accessible, and we believe that even more complex and functional structures will soon be discovered, eventually maybe even engineered and designed. Since several authors indicate that one big goal is the preparation of (poly)peptoidbased synthetic enzymes and many building blocks mimicking protein structures are already available, we anticipate that the successful realization of this dream may be within reach.

4.1.1.1.1. Immunogenicity. First, hints toward the nonimmunogenicity of poly(sarcosine) (PSR) were given by Blout et al. as early as 1959.314 Later, in a series of papers which appear to have been largely forgotten, Moran and co-workers investigated PSR conjugates to allergens such as grass pollen extract.315−319 It was found that PSR-conjugation was suitable to suppress an immune response to an antigen after antigen conjugation. Intraperitoneal inoculation and subsequent intravenous injection with PSR conjugate led to a significant reduction in the IgE antibody response.315 It was noted that the immunosuppressant activity was not as pronounced for PSR conjugates as, for example, for PEG conjugates. However, the authors claim that the dose used for PSR conjugates was much lower. It is interesting to note that the PSR conjugates were very effective to suppress the induction of IgE response in mice. However, this effect was reportedly transient.316 In vitro studies on lymphocytes led the authors to speculate on a short-lived antigen-specific T cell suppression.317 Although it was argued that PSR conjugates were not performing well enough in the assays to warrant clinical development, interesting differences between PEGylated allergens and allergens conjugated to other water-soluble polymers [e.g., poly(D-glutamic acid-co-L-lysine)] were noted. Also, as a result of these studies, the authors hypothesized on a new modality for the treatment of allergies: continuous exposure to allergen to attenuate response to seasonal allergies.318 This treatment is now called allergen immunotherapy or hyposensitization. In the last communication of this series, the level of serum IgE was also followed in mice intranasally exposed to grass pollen.319 The mice were also treated with a conjugate of PSR to grass pollen. It was found that the conjugate completely prevented antibody formation, if the conjugate was coadministered from the beginning of the experiment. If the mice were primed with pollen and conjugate administration using the same route commenced after priming, the conjugate was still able to reduce the IgE titer. Moran and co-workers therefore called PSR a tolerogen. Kimura and co-workers investigated pharmacokinetics of PSR-containing block copolymers, apparently unaware of the studies of Moran and co-workers. Mediated by B-lymphocytes, so-called lactosomes [comprising poly(sarcosine)-block-poly(Llactic acid)] were rapidly cleared after repeated injection.320 Investigations using peptosomes (the hydrophobic block is made of an peptide) revealed a correlation between the high local density of PSR and the prevention of interaction with antibody B-cell receptors.321,322 The lactosomes act as T cellindependent antigens. Very recent investigations of Kimura and

4. APPLICATIONS OF (POLY)PEPTOIDS 4.1. (Poly)peptoids as Biomaterials

Due to the relation to (poly)peptides, (poly)peptoids have always been investigated in the context of biomaterials. Since supra- and macromolecular engineering is often used to prepare structures intended to use as biomaterials, we find it appropriate to review what has been done with (poly)peptoids as biomaterials. We have reviewed this topic a few years ago,39 but since then, a number of older papers came to our attention, which have been widely forgotten, and also new and important insights have been gained. 4.1.1. Biocompatibility and Degradability. 4.1.1.1. Biocompatibility of (Poly)peptoids. Minimizing adverse effects is a principal aim when using biomaterials. Therefore, high demands on polymers applied in medicine and healthcare are made. (Poly)peptoids are currently promising to meet these expectations, including biocompatibility and (bio)degradability. 1781


Chemical Reviews

Review

Figure 32. Cell viability assays of various polypeptoids: poly(sarcosine) (P1), poly(sarcosine)-block-poly(N-n-propylglycine) (P3), poly(sarcosine)block-poly(N-n-ppentylglycine) (P6), and poly(sarcosine)-block-poly(N-n-propylglycine)-block-poly(sarcosine) (P11). Reprinted with permission from ref 324. Copyright 2014 Wiley-VCH.

onset temperatures close to or lower than 37 °C. As a result, significant cytotoxicity of these polymers was observed. 4.1.1.2. Degradability of (Poly)peptoids. N-Substitution of peptides is a common tool of biological and medicinal chemistry to enhance the resistance of sequences toward enzymatic degradation or to modify their conformation.1,325−327 However, a certain extent of biodegradation appears to be advantageous for the application of peptoids in pharmaceuticals, thus reducing the risk of accumulation with potentially negative implications. In this context, three different forms of degradation need to be considered: hydrolysis by acidic environments, proteolytic digestion by enzymes, and oxidative degradation by so-called reactive oxygen species (ROS). 4.1.1.2.1. Acidic Hydrolysis. Like (poly)peptides, watersoluble (poly)peptoids are prone to hydrolysis under highly acidic conditions (6 N HCl, pH −0.8, 120 °C), yielding the respective amino acids.249 However, as similar conditions are not met within mammalian tissue, acidic hydrolysis is considered to be not of relevance for the biodegradation of (poly)peptoids. 4.1.1.2.2. Digestion by Enzymes. As mentioned previously, the introduction of tertiary amide bonds is known to introduce excellent resistance to proteases. Studies by Zuckermann and co-workers indicate that enzymatic degradation of peptoids does not occur.328 The degradation of specifically designed peptide sequences consisting of L-amino acids was investigated using a number of important enzymes (carboxypeptidase A, papain, pepsin, trypsin, elastase, and chymotrypsin). This was compared with the degradation of the respective sequences of D-amino acids as well as peptoids and retro-peptoids in reverse order. As expected, chain scission of the L-amino acid sequences was observed. In contrast, neither D-amino acid sequences nor

co-workers revealed that high concentrations of lactosomeresponsive B1a cells are located in the peritoneal cavity of mice, from where they migrate into spleen tissue as a result of stimulation by lactosomes.323 4.1.1.1.2. Cytotoxicity. Despite the use of PSR in animal studies in various contexts, until recently, the cytotoxicity of PSR or other polypeptoids has not been investigated. Zhang et al. studied the cytotoxicity of cyclic random copolymers of Nethylglycine and N-butylglycine.71 Using the CellTiter Blue cell viability assay, incubation of human embryonic lung fibroblasts (HEL229) was performed in PBS buffer containing the copolymer in concentrations up to 5 g/L. After 24 h, a cell viability of approximately 80% was observed, comparable with PEG of similar molar mass. Recently, Luxenhofer and co-workers examined the cytotoxicity of PSR as well as different block copolymers consisting of sarcosine and N-propyl- or N-pentylglycine, respectively (Figure 32). Up to 10 g/L, depending on the solubility of the particular polymer, no cytotoxicity was observed.324 Cell viabilities (HepG2) were found above 80%, as determined using a WST-1 assay after 24 h of incubation. Ling and co-workers reported low cytotoxicity of copolymers obtained from sarcosine-NTA and N-butylglycine-NTA comparable with PEG and PSR.70 More detailed studies of the same group investigated the cytotoxicity of random copolymers comprising sarcosine and N-butylglycine units using a MTT cell viability assay.189 With dependence on the composition of the polymer, different onset cloud point temperatures resulted in concentration-dependent cytotoxicity. At low concentrations, up to 1 mg/L, samples dissolved in water at 37 °C and were noncytotoxic, comparable to PSR. Increased concentrations of 3 mg/L resulted in partial precipitation of the polymer with 1782


Chemical Reviews

Review

Figure 33. Potential mechanism of oxidative (poly)peptoid degradation compared to the degradation of PEG (left) and of poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) (right). Reprinted with permission from ref 341. Copyright 2014 Elsevier Ltd.

the formation of a gradient copolymer with a higher proportion of sarcosine at the N-terminus, it can be hypothesized that Proline Iminopeptidase cleaves N-terminal sarcosine as well. As this enzyme was found not only in bacteria and chicken egg white, but also in rat, rabbit, and swine tissue like liver, kidney, spleen, heart, lung, and testis,329−332 the enzymatic degradation of (poly)peptoids should not be completely ruled out yet. However, even if PSR may be degraded by enzymes, it should be obvious that any projection to other (poly)peptoids should be handled with extreme caution. 4.1.1.2.3. Oxidative Degradation. Although the pathway of oxidative degradation is often underrepresented in the considerations of biomaterials stability, it is a significant part in the metabolism of proteins and associated with various diseases like cancer, neurological disorders such as Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Huntington’s disease, and schizophrenia as well as chronic fatigue syndrome, congestive heart failure, and the process of aging.333,334 PEG-based hydrogels cross-linked by oligo(L-proline) linkers were shown to be degraded by a system comprising hydrogen peroxide and cupric ions within 4 days.335 According to Sung and co-workers, this can be attributed to the degradation of oligo(L-proline). However, the resistance of PEG as a polyether against oxidative degradation should be questioned as well. Early works by McGary Jr. showed that PEG is highly susceptible to oxidation under similar conditions, thus being degraded within 2 days or less.336 At the same time, Textor and co-workers investigated the stability of structural isomers of

peptoid sequences were modified or degraded. On the one hand, this is easily comprehensible with regard to the tertiary structure of enzymes. Access to their active site is usually impeded by steric hindrance, thus creating high substrate specificity and probably preventing digestion of the altered sequence in this case. On the other hand, it is noteworthy that all investigated enzymes, except Papain, rule out peptide chain scission next to a proline residue. As proline is the only naturally occurring proteinogenic secondary amino acid, it appears that a priori these enzymes are not well-suited to investigate the digestion of (poly)peptoids. Instead, it remains to be elucidated if enzymes which do not exclude chain scission next to proline residues or are even specific to proline are capable of degrading (poly)peptoids. A promising candidate is an exopeptidase called Proline Iminopeptidase, which, according to early works of Katchalski, cleaves exclusively N-terminal L-proline.329,330 In order to prove this assumption, they investigated the degradation of different copolymers comprising L-proline and D-proline, hydroxyproline, glycine, or sarcosine, respectively.329 The amount of free Lproline after exhaustive digestion was determined using a colorimetric assay and compared with a calculation based on statistical considerations. In the case of D-proline and hydroxyproline, their calculation is in good agreement with the detected amount of released L-proline. However, when sarcosine was used as a comonomer, the actual amount of released L-proline is 4.4 times higher than predicted. Taking into account investigations on the copolymerization of sarcosine and proline by Fasman and Blout,249 who observed 1783


Chemical Reviews

Review

Figure 34. Pharmacokinetic change during multiple intravenous administrations of Lactosome (50 μg/mouse, Lactosome diameter: 35 nm). (a−d) NIFR images of tumor-transplanted nude mice 5 and 24 h after intravenous injection of ICG-labeled lactosome (n = 3) demonstrating significant influence of lactosome preinjection. (e) Time schedule for NIRF imaging and lactosome administration. Reprinted with permission from ref 320. Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V.

sarcosine and either lactic acid or leucine-aminoisobutyric acid (Leu-Aib)n oligomers. These form nanoscopic assemblies, of which the biodistribution was studied.347−350 Upon single injections, all systems exhibited stealth properties and long circulation. Interestingly, depending on the hydrophobic domain, significant changes of the pharmacokinetics could be observed after multiple injections (Figure 34).320 However, incorporation of any active pharmaceutical ingredient into these nanoassemblies remains to be demonstrated. More recently, Barz and co-workers have picked up and revisited poly(sarcosine)-polypeptide block copolymers.190,351−354 Heller et al. prepared an PSR-based alternative to the well-known nonviral vector poly(ethylene glycol)-blockpoly(L-lysine) (PLL). Block sizes were varied and cytotoxicity, and transfection efficiency were assessed.351 Also, preliminary studies were conducted with respect to targeting micelles based on poly(sarcosine)-block-poly(γ-benzyl-L-glutamate), end-functionalized with a mannose derivative. Cellular uptake in DC 2.4 and bone marrow derived dendritic cells could be significantly (by approximately 50%) decreased by blocking the mannose receptor or the clathrin-mediated endocytosis.353 Fetsch et al. provided a preliminary study on polypeptoid amphiphiles for drug delivery.324 Whether the resulting aggregates are useful for drug delivery remains to be established. To date, only model substances were successfully solubilized. However, the cytotoxicity profile is rather promising (see section 4.1.1.1.2). Independently, uniform peptoids have been investigated in the context of drug, protein, or gene delivery. Barron and coworkers investigated the pharmacological effects of attachment of sarcosine to a short peptide sequence (C20), an approach they termed NMEGylation (after N-methylglycine).355 While it was found that the stability and solubility were enhanced by attaching peptoid oligomers (up to 20 units of sarcosine), they found that attaching more than one sarcosine unit severely interfered with binding to the peptides target. In fact, to retain a reasonable biological activity, the C-terminus of the peptide was modified with glycine-sarcosine. Sequence-specific peptoids356 and lipid-peptoid conjugates357,358 (with regard to the term lipitoids, it should be

polypeptoids (i.e., poly(2-oxazoline)s), in comparison with PEG. Interestingly, poly(2-oxazoline)s were found to be much more stable than PEG.337−340 Inspired by these contradicting results, Luxenhofer and coworkers analyzed the degradation of PEG as well as poly(Nethylglycine) and poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) in solution and depending on the concentration of the oxidative species.341 As expected, degradation depended strongly on the concentration of hydrogen peroxide (0.5−50 mM). Furthermore, it was shown that the degradation rate correlates with the degree of polymerization, as longer polymers chains were degraded faster than shorter ones, probably due to the influence of more readily oxidizable end groups (i.e., amines vs amides). In the case of shorter polymer chains, a greater proportion of end groups may decelerate oxidation of the polymer backbone and thus degradation of the polymer. However, this needs to be elucidated in more detail. Most importantly, at a similar degree of polymerization, PEG was shown to be less susceptible to oxidative damage than both pseudopolypeptides. Proposed mechanisms of oxidative degradation demonstrate the possibility of backbone scission for all three investigated polymers (Figure 33). Nevertheless, although Sung and coworkers stated the applied conditions as biologically relevant, it remains to be demonstrated how these results are applicable to in vivo conditions. 4.1.2. Drug Delivery. As in some other aspects of (poly)peptoids research, studies in the context of drug delivery were conducted for uniform as well as nonuniform (poly)peptoids. Both communities appear to be rather oblivious to each other. The earliest studies containing nonuniform polypeptoids, specifically PSR, for drug delivery came out of the group of Imanishi.342−346 Kimura later continued and extended these studies.201,320−322,347−350 So-called peptosomes, comprising PSR as hydrophilic moiety and poly(γ-methyl L-glutamate) as hydrophobic moiety, showed long blood circulation times comparable to PEGylated liposomes as well as enhanced accumulation within the model liver tumor tissue. In recent efforts, the Kimura group is concentrating their work on amphiphilic block copolymers of 1784


Chemical Reviews

Review

Figure 35. Comparison of the pharmacokinetic profile of different antimicrobial peptide and peptoids. It was confirmed that peptoids exhibit higher stability in vivo; in addition, higher tissue accumulation and slower excretion was observed. Reprinted from ref 368. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society.

demonstrated very early the potential of peptoids in supramolecular binding to relevant targets. A few years later, Kodadek and co-workers also used a library approach and identified potent transcription factor mimics.364 Besides ligands to modulate protein expression or biological signaling, some effort has been divested into development of antimicrobial peptoids.97,365−370 Scialdone and co-workers investigated β-peptoids with cationic and hydrophobic building blocks and found moderate activity against E. coli.97 In a series of papers, Barron and co-workers investigated antimicrobial peptoids, some of which show antibacterial activity at lower concentration than clinically employed antibiotics (Figure 35).365−368 Good antimicrobial activity coupled with low toxicity in mammalian cells could be achieved. Also here, the easy structural variation was valuable in the development. Another interesting application in which interaction with cell membranes is important are so-called cellpenetrating peptides, for which, of course, also the analogue cell-penetrating peptoids have been studied. Kodadek found that peptoids in general exhibit a better membrane permeability as compared to peptides.371 This is also true for the individual amino acids.372 Olsen and co-workers investigated hybrid structures of peptides and β-peptoids as cell-penetrating applications285 and for their antiplasmodial activity.284 Peréz-Payá, Vicent, and co-workers identified a peptoidinhibitor of the apoptotic protease-activating factor 1 (Apaf1)373,374 and also conjugated it to a poly(glutamic acid) as a carrier.375 This conjugate was able to reduce inflammation in renal tubular cells.376 Kodadek reported on what they call a peptoid-based “antibody surrogate”.377 Binding affinities and specificities similar to antibodies were achieved by peptoid dimerization. Liskamp310 and, more recently, Bezprozvanny and co-workers378 studied peptoids to inhibit amyloid aggregation, and Gilon91 and co-workers studied protein kinase B inhibitors. Barron and co-workers investigated biomimetic peptoid analogues of lung surfactant proteins.379,380 Other recent examples include autophagy enhancer381 and αmannosidase inhibitors.382

noted that the term lipitoid is not only used for lipid-peptoid conjugates but also used for other lipidlike materials)359 were investigated for gene delivery early in the development of the peptoid field. Using a combinatorial approach, Zuckermann and co-workers developed effective transfection agents. Interestingly, it was reported that simple analogies (same side chains) to, for example, PLL, did not work well. Rather a triplet motif of one cationic and two aromatic moieties was found to be particularly effective.356 In a similar approach, Zuckermann also screened for the transfection efficiency of lipitoids. Again, specific sequences, similar to the ones found in the above-mentioned study without the lipid component, were investigated. However, in this instance, the triplet motif comprised a cationic and two aromatic moieties substituted in para-position with a methoxy residue.357 Later, Lobo et al. tried to establish structure property relationships between the primary structure of the peptoids, the physicochemical properties of the polyplexes, and their transfection efficiency. Unfortunately, no clear deductions could be made.358 One could say that although these peptoids would seem ideal to deduce design principles, it appears to be not straightforward to do so successfully. Recently, lipitoids were successfully employed in bovine trophectoderm CT-1 cells. Significant improvement over other standard transfection protocols was reported.360 4.1.3. Pharmacologically Active (Poly)peptoids. Obviously, (poly)peptides are well-known to be often pharmacologically active. Considering (poly)peptoids are peptide mimetics with an excellent propensity for protease resistance, development of pharmacologically active (poly)peptoids appears immediately intriguing. Accordingly, the development of peptoid-based ligands binding to relevant receptors was among the first fields peptoids were applied. This topic was reviewed a few years back by Zuckermann and Kodadek361 as well as Blackwell and co-workers.362 Here, we will only discuss a few classic examples and some newer developments. Using a library of 5000 di- and tripeptoids, nanomolar ligands of G-protein coupled receptors were identified and tested pharmacologically in various species.108,363 This 1785


Chemical Reviews

Review

Figure 36. Comparison of protein adsorption of different zwitterionic peptoids at different degrees of surface coverage. Clearly, the surface coverage must be higher for the shorter 20-mers as compared to the 36-mers. In comparison, the effects of the different structures of the peptoids are minor. Adapted with permission from ref 388. Copyright 2015 Wiley-VCH.

stem cells showed no adherence to PSR brushes irrespective of whether the surfaces were preincubated cell culture media or serum supplemented media (Figure 37).

Barron reported a strategy with which the authors hope to reduce the effort necessary to identify peptoid-based analoga of therapeutically active peptides by screening systematically peptoid-replaceable amino acids in the primary sequence.383 This approach is still somewhat labor-intensive. Ultimately, it would be very attractive if computational approaches to this problem became available. 4.1.4. Nonfouling Surface Coatings. In a series of papers, Messersmith and co-workers studied the nonfouling properties of peptoids grafted onto various surfaces.384−388 In all accounts, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) derivatives were used to anchor the peptoids to the surfaces. Initially, oligomers of Nmethoxyethylglycine were studied and nonfouling properties were maintained for several months.384 Subsequently, other side chains were investigated and minor differences were observed.385,389 Also effects of surface coverage and degree of polymerizations were investigated. A minimum of 15 repeating units was found to elicit excellent and long-term (several months) nonfouling properties.386,387 All previously investigated peptoids were nonionic in nature. More recently, also peptoids with betaine containing side chains were investigated.388 The results of this work shows that surface grafting and chain length effects are dominant factors in determing the performance of these structures (Figure 36). Very recently, the first investigations on nonfouling surfaces obtained by surface-initiated polymerization of sarcosine-NCA were reported.151 The investigated brushes were approximately 20 nm thick, which would correspond to approximately 50mers, if the chains were fully extended. Incubation with fetal bovine serum (FBS) resulted in no detectable (by surface plasmon resonsance) adsorption. Also, human mesenchymal

4.2. Energy Materials

For more than a century, electricity has strongly affected human society, arguably as much as chemistry has. With the discussion on limited fossil resources and potential alternatives from renewable resources, better solutions toward energy storage have beecome of major issue in recent years. Lithium-ion polymer batteries (LiPo) include a polymer electrolyte instead of the more common liquid electrolyte and are promising due to the possibility of creating high-energy densities. Zuckermann and co-workers designed a series of uniform peptoids bearing ethylene oxide (EO)-based substituents via SPSS.390 The side chains consisted of 1 to 3 EO units and were chosen due to the high ion conductivity known from PEG-based materials (Figure 38). Synthesized polymers were characterized by analytical HPLC, MALDI-TOF-MS, DSC/TGA, and XRD. The glass transition temperatures (Tg) were found to decrease with increasing side chain length (see section 2.5.2.1). The i n t r o d u c t i o n o f l i t h i u m s a l t s (i .e ., l i t h i u m [ b i s (trifluoromethansulfonyl)imide]), causes an increase of the Tg, which also rises linearly with increasing salt concentration due to the complexation of the polypeptoid with these salts. Conductivity measurements at 50 and 90 °C clearly show that the highest ionic conductivity is achieved with the longest side chain, even though the conductivity was dependent on ion concentration and temperature. The highest conductivity (2.6 × 10−4 S/cm) was achieved at 100 °C and is higher than that of PEG-mimetic polypeptides. Nevertheless, the conductivity is 1786


Chemical Reviews

Review

Figure 37. In situ SPR monitoring of protein adsorption from pure FBS on (a) native gold and (b) homogeneous PSR brush (d = 19.7 nm) on gold. (c) hMSC Cell adhesion on native gold (Au) PSR brush surfaces from pure culture medium (blue) and with an addition of 10% FBS (red), quantified by the LDH assay. (d) Fluorescence microscopy image of selected absorption of labeled albumin (Albumin-DyLight488) on a patterned PSR brush surface. The surface shows strong protein adsorption on areas of native gold but no adsorption on PSR covered areas (dots and stripes). Reprinted with permission from ref 151. Copyright 2015 Wiley VCH.

Figure 38. Change of glass transition temperature and Li+ coordination sites per chain in dependency of the side chain length. Reproduced from ref 390. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society.

structurally analogous ethyleneoxy-containing diblock copolypeptoids poly(N-(2-ethyl)hexylglycine)-block-poly(N-2-(2-(2methoxyethoxy)ethoxy)ethylglycine) (pNeh-b-pNte) and poly(N-decylglycine)-block-poly(N-2-(2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy)ethylglycine) (pNdc-b-pNte) with 18 monomer units per block were investigated (Figure 39). By systematically studying the structure-conductivity relationships of the two diblock copolypeptoids, the authors unexpectedly obtained a

significantly lower than that of PEG homopolymers at the same salt concentration. Balsara and Zuckermann also studied the impact of side chain structure on crystallization behavior. Interestingly, the triethyleneoxy-containing peptoid is amorphous as homopolymer but will crystallize when coupled to a poly(N-decylglycine) block.391 On the basis of this, Balsara and Zuckermann investigated lithium ion transport in amorphous and crystalline domains of the same peptoid block.210 Two 1787


Chemical Reviews

Review

vinylpyrrolidone) and poly(N-vinylcaprolactam). Interestingly, poly(N-propylglycine) of higher as well as lower molar mass presents higher T0 values. The KHI performance was found to correlate positively with the concentration.393 Also poly(β-peptoid)s were analyzed in this context. Reyes et al. investigated the KHI performance of homopolymers as well as of block and random copolymers. The former bearing short side chains, as methyl and ethyl, present poor activity. The authors suggest that these chains are not long enough to disrupt the intermolecular water structure to avoid preform clathrate formation and further interactions with initial hydrate clusters. Copolymers that additionally contain poly(N-propyl-β-alanine) exhibit a slightly decrease in T0 values. The random copolymer consisting of poly(N-ethyl-β-alanine-co-N-propyl-β-alanine) showed the best performance as KHI, with T0 values of 10.4 °C.397 Surprisingly, the same number of monomer units arranged as a block copolymer lead to a diminished effect. Overall, in comparison to the KHI performance of the closely related polypeptoids, the poly(β-peptoid)s show a significantly poorer performance. 4.3.2. Antifreeze Agents. The formation of ice is arguably among the pervasive natural crystallization processes. All the more, it is surprising that in many respects the freezing properties of water are not completely understood.398 Ward and Kirshenbaum investigated the ability of peptoids to control ice crystallization which would be useful in antifreeze agents.394 A small library of peptoids ranging from trimers to heptamers with side chains bearing hydroxyl, methoxyethyl, and methyl substituents was synthesized. For comparison, glycerol and short oligo(serine)s were used (Figure 40). Their impact on ice morphology was evaluated with variable temperature video microscopy. Crystals grown in the presence of any additive appeared smaller than those grown in pure water. However, the most significant reductions compared to the ice crystals grown in water (Figure 41) were observed for the tripeptoids, especially with the trimer of the hydroxylcontaining peptoid Ac(Nser) (Figure 41).

Figure 39. Different structures of poly(N-alkylglycine)-block-poly(N2-(2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy)ethylglycine) block copolymers. Reprinted from ref 210. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.

comparable intrinsic conductivity for the crystalline and amorphous pNte at the same salt concentration and temperature. However, the thermal properties are very different. 4.3. Crystallization Modifiers

Native biopolymers have the ability to precisely modulate the formation of inorganic crystalline materials.392 Despite their versatility and ease of structural modification, peptidomimetic oligomers or polymers like polypeptoids have not yet been explored extensively as crystallization modulators. Recently, (poly)peptoids have been applied to inhibit the formation of gas hydrates,393 to control the ice crystallization (antifreeze agents),394 and to control the crystallization of calcite (CaCO3).395,396 4.3.1. Kinetic Hydrate Inhibitors. Natural gas, besides crude oil and coal, is one of the big energy resources of our world. A serious problem for offshore as well as onshore oil and gas production plants is the accumulation of gas hydrates and their plugging of pipelines. Among other problem-solving approaches, the use of kinetic hydrate inhibitors (KHIs), which delay hydrate formation, is investigated by different research groups. Very recently, Kelland and Reyes studied the suitability of different polypeptoids and poly(β-peptoid)s for gas hydrate kinetic inhibition using a natural gas mixture to promote SII hydrates.393,397 Polypeptoids are potentially very suitable for this purpose because of the possibility of their backbone to form hydrogen bonds with water molecules and hydrophobic side chains featuring an affinity to gas hydrate cavities. The most important physicochemical properties are molecular weight, cloud point, and onset temperature of crystal growth (T0). The latter was determined by a series of constant cooling experiments which were carried out in high-pressure rocking cells. For polypeptoids, Kelland et al. showed that certain adaptations to the alkyl carbon chain attached to the polymer increase kinetic hydrate inhibition as long as water solubility is maintained. The best result was given by poly(N-propylglycine) (Mn = 2.2 kg/mol) with an average T0 value of 4.7 °C, which compares favorably with established KHIs such as poly(N-

Figure 41. Ice crystals grown at −1.0 °C in (a) pure water or (b) 10 mg/mL Ac(Nser)3 aqueous solution. Reprinted with permission from ref 394. Copyright 2012 National Academy of Sciences.

Furthermore, the ice crystal growth rates were investigated by measuring the advance of the ice growth front over time.

Figure 40. Peptoids and peptides with varying sequence lengths (n) investigated as antifreeze agents.394 1788


Chemical Reviews

Review

of 50 nM and nearly 28-fold at 200 nM. If the concentration was increased further, the step speed diminished significantly, possibly due to surface binding. As an explanation for the growth acceleration, the authors established three hypotheses. The first is that peptoids effectively increase the local concentration. Also, it is suggested that due to coordination, the energy barrier of desolvation and/or orientation is lowered. As the third mechanism, the authors propose that the water layer adsorbed to the crystal surface is disrupted, decreasing the energetic cost of removing water from the crystal surface. Recently, DeYoreo, Zuckermann, and co-workers extended this work by synthesizing 28 different peptoid chains and studying the peptoid-induced controls over calcite morphology in a more systematic evaluation.396 It has been demonstrated that the morphology as well as the acceleration or inhibition observed during the growth of calcite can be adjusted by balancing the electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions. The dominant role can be assigned to the latter. Interestingly, either strong hydrophobic or electrostatic interactions inhibit crystal growth and reduce expression of the (104) face. In conclusion, the authors hypothesize a model for peptoid interaction with the calcite (Figure 43). In this configuration the polar groups are designed to bring the hydrophobic groups close to the surface, where they act to disrupt the adsorbed water layer. This supports the third hypothesis (vide supra). Due to the large number of primary amines available for the synthesis of peptoid side chains, the authors suggest that the variability for designing peptoids that are useful at controlling crystallization is broader than that available through synthetic proteins.

The slowest rates were observed in the presence of peptoid trimers and hexamers, regardless of the side chain identity. Surprisingly, the usage of peptoid tetra- and pentamers results in even faster growth rates with respect to pure water. Additionally, the influence of the trimer additives on the melting temperatures of ice was studied by DSC. All additives depressed the melting temperature and only slight differences could be observed, with the exception of oligo(sarcosine) which had a smaller effect. However, the observed reduction in melting temperatures was significantly higher than the calculated values from colligative effects alone. Again the hydroxyl-containing peptoid exhibited the largest temperature shift relative to the expected colligative effect. Obviously, the short achiral peptoids used in this study do not exhibit conformational order. However, the authors suggest that peptoids which form secondary structures, as discussed in section 3.2, may further influence ice crystallization because of epitaxial matching with the crystal planes. This assumption is further supported by the studies of Davies and co-workers demonstrating higher activity of antifreeze proteins exhibiting a β-helix structures.399 4.3.3. Controlling Biomineralization. In nature, nucleation and growth of inorganic minerals like calcium carbonate are precisely controlled by peptides and proteins (biomineralization). This process consumes carbon dioxide, which offers the possibility to mimic the action of these natural biopolymers and develop a technology that is broadly applicable to industrial crystallization, including carbon dioxide sequestration. DeYoreo, Zuckermann, and co-workers designed different amphiphilic peptoids that fulfill the requirements, like the specific amino acid sequence, the number of carboxylic acid groups, and the overall hydrophilicity. These factors play an important role in the nucleation and growth of CaCO3 minerals.395 An analysis of the morphology of crystals grown in the presence of these peptoids revealed structures very comparable to those grown in the presence of native proteins. Moreover, other peptoids lead to CaCO3 crystals that exhibited a number of unique morphologies ranging from twisted paddles to spheres (Figure 42).

4.4. Chromatography Materials

Especially in the field of natural products chemistry, chromatography provides a useful analytical and preparative tool for the separation of mixtures of compounds and enantiomers. Due to the great variety of available chiral submonomers as well as the ability to form secondary structures, peptoids appear to be a useful platform for chromatography materials. For this purpose, Liang et al. investigated the application of peptoids in chromatographic processes.400−405 First studies demonstrated strong dependency of enantioseparation efficacy on the peptoid chain length, which was attributed to the formation of helical secondary structures.400 Although hydrogen bonds appear to have major impact on the separation of racemic mixtures, steric hindrance and π−π-interactions are considered to affect chiral recognition as well. Furthermore, chiral and achiral terminal groups can be introduced in order to optimize interactions between the peptoid chiral stationary phase (CSP) and the analyte.401−403 As demonstrated recently, quinine and quinidine moieties attached to the carbamate group in the C9-position further improve the performance of peptoid CSPs and even outperformed commercially available systems.405 Thus, applicability of peptoids as chromatography material is supported by their great potential for analyte-specific tuning.

Figure 42. Different morphologies. (a) “Twisted paddles” vs (b) spheres of CaCO3 crystals grown in the presence of diblock peptoids of N-(2-carboxyethyl)glycine (Nce) and N-(2-(X-phenylethyl))glycine (NXpe). (a) Nce12-block-NXpe4 (X = 4-chloro) and (b) Nce8-blockNXpe4 (X = 2,4-dichloro). Reprinted from ref 395. Copyright 2011 American Chemical Society.

4.5. Phase Transfer Catalyst and Ion Binding Peptoids

Interestingly, combinatorial peptoid libraries, which were discussed in section 2.2.3, are not only used in the light of biology or industrial drug discovery. Kirshenbaum and coworkers investigated metal-binding peptoids that form complexes with Cu(II) and Co(II).406 A hexa- and a pentamer with terminal hydroxyquinoline ligands were synthesized, and the resulting peptoid−metal complexes characterized using

Further investigations of the influence of the hydrophobic units as well as of the number of carboxylic acid groups clearly showed the significant tunability in the crystal morphology. Additionally, the dependence of the molecular step speed on the peptoid concentration was measured using in situ atomic force microscopy (AFM). It was established that the rate of crystal growth is increased by nearly 23-fold at a concentration 1789


Chemical Reviews

Review

Figure 43. A model for the interaction between diblock-like peptoids and the calcite (104) face. Hydrophobic regions are represented in gray and hydrophilic regions in blue. Reprinted with permission from ref 396. Copyright 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited.

Figure 44. Microscope images of TentaGel resin beads loaded with different peptoids after incubation in nickel solution and exposure to 1% dimethylglyoxime solution. A color change to red within the bead matrix indicates binding to nickel. Clockwise from left: PentA, NonaB, ConTG, and ConC. Adapted with permission from ref 409. Copyright John Wiley & Sons 2014.

workers as they identified sequences that can bind to Cr6+ in different environments.410 Almost always, the chosen ligands reduced the metal ion concentration to values close to the EPA limit for drinking water, 2 μM. Even a huge excess of competing ions like chloride or sodium, typical for ocean water, lead to an only slightly decreased efficacy.

titrations monitored with UV−vis and CD spectroscopy. Not surprisingly, investigations of cyclic peptoids that coordinate metal ions as well as the establishment of combinatorial assays were the next steps of this development. To date, only Na+ and Gd3+ were found to be coordinated by cyclic peptoids.211,407 However, Ca2+ complexation and transport through a lipid membrane was reported for cyclic octa(peptide-peptoid) hybrids, comprising sarcosine, lysine, and leucine, by Kimura and co-workers.408 OBOC peptoid libraries with selective affinity for particular metal ions in a heterogeneous mixture were created by Nalband et al.409 By using X-ray fluorescence, it was possible to screen the library of peptoid oligomers rapidly on solid support. Interestingly, only two compounds, PentA and NonaB, bound to Ni2+ ions, which is indicated by a red color change (Figure 44). Thus, it was possible to identify ligands that are able to remove specific ions from a buffered solution. Additionally, the authors pointed out that any atom with an atomic number larger than 12 can be monitored. The great value of the peptoid-based library was shown by Francis and co-

5. SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK: THE FRONTIER Although some (poly)peptoids have been known for a very long time, they have been in the shadows of polypeptides, their much more prominent brethren. Over many decades, poly(sarcosine), the most simple polypeptoid was virtually the only polypeptoid investigated and obtained through polymerization. The interest in this polymer was mainly due to the fact that side reactions, which hampered the controlled synthesis of synthetic polypeptides for decades, were presumed to be absent in the polymerization of the N-substituted N-carboxyanhydrides. At the same time, the polymer was interesting as it did not form secondary structures and exhibits low immunogenicity. Other 1790


Chemical Reviews

Review

Biographies

polypeptoids were hardly investigated, presumably due to synthetic challenges. In the past few years, great progress was made in extending the toolbox for polypeptoids. Smart polypeptoids and multiblock copolymers were prepared, which will extend the application profile drastically. With the development of solid-phase supported and sequence-specific peptoid synthesis by Zuckermann and coworkers, a surge in interest in these biomimetic materials was initiated, which was entirely decoupled (and largely remains decoupled) from their nonuniform analogues. While uniform peptoid-peptide hybrids are well-established, interest in nonuniform hybrids was very limited but has become more intense recently. In contrast, the combination of nonuniform polypeptoids and polypeptides with uniform peptoids and peptides has hardly been touched upon. However, the results by Kimura and co-workers discussed in the review are very intriguing. With the development and refinement of the solid-phase peptoid polymerization (SP3), this combination becomes straightforward accessible. Accordingly, we see a lot of potential for future development in macro- and supramolecular engineering, biomaterials design, and biomimetic materials. Early work and more recent work clearly bring hope that (poly)peptoids can be tailored to exhibit an excellent biocompatibility profile. We expect that this will kickstart considerable work of (poly)peptoids in the field of nanomedicine. Biomimetic structures were realized with great success using peptoids, so it will be interesting whether polypeptoids or the combination of peptoids and polypeptoids will have a significant impact in this context. In the past few years, a new buzz-word, information rich polymers, has created some interest. Of course this is conceptually closely related to sequence specificity for which the use of peptoids and polypeptoids is a natural ally. Overall, the research in peptoids has matured in a very fascinating way and plays a crucial role in current supra- and macromolecular engineering. Polypeptoids are still in there infancy in many ways, but the promise can be clearly seen. The idea to combine peptoids and polypeptoids is just being conceived. We have no doubt that a bright, complex, and fascinating future lies ahead for (poly)peptoids.

Niklas Gangloff (pictured 2nd from left) received his B.Sc. in Chemistry from the Technical University (TU) of Dresden while conducting cell viability studies of different cell lines when incubated with an anticancer drug. In the course of his Master’s studies, he worked on biodegradable nanogel star polymers at the IBM Almaden Research Center in San José, California, and received his M.Sc. from the TU developing the solid-phase peptoid polymerization (SP3). Since 2013, he has been working on his Ph.D. at the University of Würzburg. In collaboration with Ronald Zuckermann at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, he is investigating polypeptoids and their aggregation behavior. Juliane Ulbricht (pictured 3rd from left) studied chemistry at the TU Dresden, Germany, and received her MSc. in 2013 for her Master’s thesis on the oxidative degradation of pseudopolypeptides. In 2014, she joined the group of Robert Luxenhofer at Würzburg University as a Ph.D. student. Her current research interests include the degradation behavior of polypeptoids by oxidative species as well as enzymes. Thomas Lorson (pictured far right) received his B.Sc. and M.Sc. in Functional Materials from the Julius-Maximilians-University in Würzburg, Germany. Under the guidance of Prof. Gerhard Sextl, he completed his thesis at the Fraunhofer ISC in developing preceramic polymers for the production of fibers. He joined the group of Robert Luxenhofer as a Ph.D. candidate in 2014. His current research focuses on the development of novel polymeric biomaterials and scaffold designs for tissue engineering applications.

AUTHOR INFORMATION Corresponding Author

*E-mail: [email protected].

Helmut Schlaad studied chemistry at the University of Mainz, Germany, and earned a doctoral degree in Physical Chemistry, under Axel H. E. Müller in 1997. After one year of postdoctoral fellowship with Rudolf Faust at the University of Massachusetts in Lowell, USA, he moved to the Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces in Potsdam, Germany. He finished habilitation, mentored by Prof. Markus Antonietti, and received the venia legendi in Physical

Author Contributions §

J.U. and T.L. contributed equally.

Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest. 1791


Chemical Reviews

Review

Methyl-alanines) Induced by Trifluoroacetic Acid. Biopolymers 1973, 12, 2549−2561. (13) Goodman, M.; Chen, F.; Prince, F. R. Conformational aspect of polypeptide structure. XLIV. Conformational transitions of poly(Nmethyl-alanines) induced by trifluoroacetic acid. Biopolymers 1973, 12, 2549−2561. (14) Tonelli, A. The effects of isolated N-methylated residues on the conformational characteristics of polypeptides. Biopolymers 1976, 15, 1615−1622. (15) Cosani, A.; Palumbo, M.; Terbojevich, M.; Peggion, E. NSubstituted Poly (α-amino acids). 1. Synthesis and Characterization of Poly (N-methyl-γ-methyl L-glutamate) and Poly (N-methyl-γ-ethyl Lglutamate). Macromolecules 1978, 11, 1041−1045. (16) Cosani, A.; Terbojevich, M.; Palumbo, M.; Peggion, E.; Goodman, M. N-Substituted Poly (α-amino acids). 2. Conformational Properties of Poly (γ-ethyl N-methyl-L-glutamate) in Various Solvent Mixtures. Macromolecules 1979, 12, 875−877. (17) Goodman, M.; Fried, M. Conformational Aspects of Polypeptide Structure. XX. Helical Poly-N-methyl-L-alanine. Experimental Results. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 1264−1267. (18) Sigmund, F.; Wessely, F. Untersuchungen über α-Amino-NCarbonsäureanhydride. II. Hoppe-Seyler's Z. Physiol. Chem. 1926, 157, 91−105. (19) Leuchs, H. Ueber die Glycin-carbonsäure. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1906, 39, 857−861. (20) Leuchs, H.; Manasse, W. Ü ber die Isomerie der Carbäthoxylglycyl glycinester. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1907, 40, 3235−3249. (21) Leuchs, H.; Geiger, W. Ü ber die Anhydride von α-Amino-Ncarbonsäuren und die von α-Aminosäuren. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1908, 41, 1721−1726. (22) Lichtenthaler, F. W. Emil Fischer, his personality, his achievements, and his scientific progeny. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 2002, 4095−4122. (23) Kricheldorf, H. R. Polypeptides and 100 years of chemistry of alpha-amino acid N-carboxyanhydrides. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5752−5784. (24) Staudinger, H. Ü ber Polymerisation. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. B 1920, 53, 1073−1085. (25) Fuchs, F. Ü ber N-Carbonsäure-anhydride. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. B 1922, 55, 2943−2943. (26) Curtius, T.; Sieber, W. Umwandlung von alkylierten Malonsäuren in α-Amino-säuren.(II. Mitteilung: Synthese des βPhenyl-α-alanins und der α-Amino-n-buttersäure). Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. B 1922, 55, 1543−1558. (27) Curtius, T.; Semper, A. Verhalten des 1-Ä thylesters der 3-Nitrobenzol-1.2-dicarbonsäure gegen Hydrazin. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1913, 46, 1162−1171. (28) Curtius, T.; Sieber, W. Umwandlung von Malonsäure in Glykokoll und von Methyl-malonsäure in α-Alanin. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. B 1921, 54, 1430−1437. (29) Wessely, F. Untersuchungen über α-Amino-N-Carbonsäureanhydride. I. Hoppe-Seyler's Z. Physiol. Chem. 1925, 146, 72−90. (30) Poché, D. S.; Moore, M. J.; Bowles, J. L. An unconventional method for purifying the N-carboxyanhydride derivatives of γ-alkyl-Lglutamates. Synth. Commun. 1999, 29, 843−854. (31) Wessely; Sigmund, F. Untersuchungen über α-Amino-NCaxbonsäureanhydride. III. Zur Kenntnis höhermolekularer Verbindungen. Hoppe-Seyler's Z. Physiol. Chem. 1926, 159, 102−119. (32) Culf, A. S.; Ouellette, R. J. Solid-Phase Synthesis of NSubstituted Glycine Oligomers (α-Peptoids) and Derivatives. Molecules 2010, 15, 5282−5335. (33) Seo, J.; Lee, B.; Zuckermann, R. N. Peptoids: Synthesis, Characterization, and Nanostructures. In Comprehensive Biomaterials; Ducheyne, P., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2011. (34) Knight, A. S.; Zhou, E. Y.; Francis, M. B.; Zuckermann, R. N. Sequence Programmable Peptoid Polymers for Diverse Materials Applications. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 5665−5691.

Chemistry in 2004. He was senior scientist at the Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces until 2014 and then moved to the University of Potsdam as a professor for polymer chemistry. His research interests are directed toward polymer synthesis, smart functional materials, and bioinspired polymer structures. Robert Luxenhofer (pictured left) studied chemistry at the TU München, Germany, and Sydney University, Australia. In 2007, he received his Ph.D. in polymer chemistry under the supervision of Rainer Jordan. Under the guidance of Alexander (Sasha) Kabanov, he conducted postdoctoral research in the field of nanomedicine and drug delivery at the University of Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha, Nebraska. In 2009, he returned to Germany as a KAUST Research Fellow and started to work on polypeptoids at the TU Dresden. Since 2012, he has been a professor for functional polymer materials at the Julius-Maximilians University Würzburg. His research interests include polypeptoids and poly(2-oxazoline)s, multicomponent reactions, nanomedicine and regenerative medicine, interaction of polymers with biological systems, and the questions of what we define as reproducibility in polymer science.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was supported by the Free State of Bavaria. We gratefully acknowledge financial support by the German Plastics Center SKZ and the Julius-Maximilians Universität Würzburg for start-up funding. REFERENCES (1) Laufer, B.; Chatterjee, J.; Frank, A. O.; Kessler, H. Can Nmethylated amino acids serve as substitutes for prolines in conformational design of cyclic pentapeptides? J. Pept. Sci. 2009, 15, 141−146. (2) Stryer, L.; Haugland, R. P. Energy transfer: a spectroscopic ruler. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1967, 58, 719−726. (3) Müller, D.; Stulz, J.; Kricheldorf, H. R. Secondary structure of peptides, 14. FT-IR and 13C NMR CP/MAS investigations of helix stability of solid poly(L-proline)s. Makromol. Chem. 1984, 185, 1739− 1749. (4) Woolfson, D. N.; Williams, D. H. The influence of proline residues on α-helical structure. FEBS Lett. 1990, 277, 185−188. (5) Yun, R. H.; Anderson, A.; Hermans, J. Proline in α-helix: Stability and conformation studied by dynamics simulation. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 1991, 10, 219−228. (6) Visiers, I.; Braunheim, B. B.; Weinstein, H. Prokink: a protocol for numerical evaluation of helix distortions by proline. Protein Eng., Des. Sel. 2000, 13, 603−606. (7) Doose, S.; Neuweiler, H.; Barsch, H.; Sauer, M. Probing polyproline structure and dynamics by photoinduced electron transfer provides evidence for deviations from a regular polyproline type II helix. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104, 17400−17405. (8) Best, R. B.; Merchant, K. A.; Gopich, I. V.; Schuler, B.; Bax, A.; Eaton, W. A. Effect of flexibility and cis residues in single-molecule FRET studies of polyproline. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104, 18964−18969. (9) Goodman, M.; Fried, M. Conformational Aspects of Polypeptide Structure. XX. Helical Poly-N-methyl-L-alanine. Experimental Results. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 1264−1267. (10) Portnova, S. L.; Bystrov, V. F.; Balashova, T. A.; Ivanov, V. T.; Ovchinnikov, Y. A. cis-trans-isomerism of the peptide bond in Nmethylated alanine dipeptides. Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR, Div. Chem. Sci. 1970, 19, 776−780. (11) Imanishi, Y.; Kugimiya, K.; Higashimura, T. Polymerization of L- and DL-phenylalanine N-carboxyanhydride by poly(N-methyl-Lalanine). Biopolymers 1973, 12, 2643−2656. (12) Goodman, M.; Chen, F.; Prince, F. R. Conformational Aspects of Polypeptide Structure. XLIV. Conformational Transition of Poly(N1792


Chemical Reviews

Review

(35) Secker, C.; Brosnan, S. M.; Luxenhofer, R.; Schlaad, H. Poly(αPeptoid)s Revisited: Synthesis, Properties, and Use as Biomaterials. Macromol. Biosci. 2015, 15, 881−891. (36) Zhang, D.; Lahasky, S. H.; Guo, L.; Lee, C.-U.; Lavan, M. Polypeptoid Materials: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 5833−5841. (37) Gangloff, N.; Luxenhofer, R. Peptoids for Biomimetic Hierarchical Structures. Adv. Polym. Sci. 2013, 262, 389−414. (38) Sun, J.; Zuckermann, R. N. Peptoid Polymers: A Highly Designable Bioinspired Material. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 4715−4732. (39) Luxenhofer, R.; Fetsch, C.; Grossmann, A. Polypeptoids: A Perfect Match for Molecular Definition and Macromolecular Engineering? J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2013, 51, 2731−2752. (40) Zuckermann, R. N. Peptoid origins. Biopolymers 2011, 96, 545− 555. (41) Waley, S. G.; Watson, J. The Kinetics of the Polymerization of Sarcosine Carbonic Anhydride. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 1949, 199, 499−517. (42) Kricheldorf, H. R.; v. Lossow, C.; Schwarz, G.; Fritsch, D. Chain Extension and Cyclization of Telechelic Polysarcosines NCA polymerization, Part 15. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2005, 206, 1165−1170. (43) Fetsch, C.; Grossmann, A.; Holz, L.; Nawroth, J. F.; Luxenhofer, R. Polypeptoids from N-Substituted Glycine N-Carboxyanhydrides: Hydrophilic, Hydrophobic, and Amphiphilic Polymers with Poisson Distribution. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 6746−6758. (44) Fetsch, C.; Luxenhofer, R. Highly Defined Multiblock Copolypeptoids: Pushing the Limits of Living Nucleophilic RingOpening Polymerization. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2012, 33, 1708− 1713. (45) Fetsch C., Ph.D. thesis, Polypeptoide - Synthese und Charakterisierung, Julius-Maximilians Universität Würzburg, 2015. (46) Sisido, M.; Imanishi, Y.; Higashimura, T. Molecular weight distribution of polysarcosine obtained by NCA polymerization. Makromol. Chem. 1977, 178, 3107−3114. (47) Lee, C.-U.; Li, A.; Ghale, K.; Zhang, D. Crystallization and Melting Behaviors of Cyclic and Linear Polypeptoids with Alkyl Side Chains. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 8213−8223. (48) Ballard, D. G. H.; Bamford, C. H. 65. Stereochemical aspects of the reactions between α-N-carboxy-amino-acid anhydrides and primary and secondary bases. J. Chem. Soc. 1958, 355−360. (49) Robinson, J. W.; Secker, C.; Weidner, S.; Schlaad, H. Thermoresponsive Poly(N-C3 glycine)s. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 580−587. (50) Guo, L.; Li, J.; Brown, Z.; Ghale, K.; Zhang, D. Synthesis and Characterization of Cyclic and Linear Helical Poly(alpha-peptoid)s by N-Heterocyclic Carbene-Mediated Ring-Opening Polymerizations of N-Substituted N-Carboxyanhydrides. Biopolymers 2011, 96, 596−603. (51) Robinson, J. W.; Schlaad, H. A versatile polypeptoid platform based on N-allyl glycine. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 7835−7837. (52) Lahasky, S. H.; Serem, W. K.; Guo, L.; Garno, J. C.; Zhang, D. Synthesis and Characterization of Cyclic Brush-Like Polymers by NHeterocyclic Carbene-Mediated Zwitterionic Polymerization of NPropargyl N-Carboxyanhydride and the Grafting-to Approach. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 9063−9074. (53) Secker, C.; Robinson, J. W.; Schlaad, H. Alkyne-X modification of polypeptoids. Eur. Polym. J. 2015, 62, 394−399. (54) Fetsch, C.; Luxenhofer, R. Thermal properties of aliphatic polypeptoids. Polymers 2013, 5, 112−127. (55) Ballard, D. G.; Bamford, C. H. Kinetics of the Formation of Polypeptides from N-Carboxy-α-amino-acid Anhydrides. Nature 1953, 172, 907−908. (56) Guo, L.; Lahasky, S. H.; Ghale, K.; Zhang, D. N-Heterocyclic Carbene-Mediated Zwitterionic Polymerization of N-Substituted NCarboxyanhydrides toward Poly(α-peptoid)s: Kinetic, Mechanism, and Architectural Control. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 9163−9171. (57) Heyns, K.; Schultze, H.; Brockmann, R. Zum Mechanismus Der Polymerisation Von Aminosäure-N-Carbonsäureanhydriden. Untersuchungen zum Isotopie-Effekt II. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1958, 611, 33−39.

(58) Liu, J.; Ling, J. DFT Study on Amine-Mediated Ring-Opening Mechanism of α-Amino Acid N-Carboxyanhydride and N-Substituted Glycine N-Carboxyanhydride: Secondary Amine versus Primary Amine. J. Phys. Chem. A 2015, 119, 7070−7074. (59) Bailey, J. L. The synthesis of simple peptides from anhydro-Ncarboxyamino-acids. J. Chem. Soc. 1950, 3461−3466. (60) Cook, A. H.; Levy, A. L. Studies in the azole series. Part XXVII. A new method of peptide synthesis: glycyl peptides. J. Chem. Soc. 1950, 646−651. (61) Cook, A. H.; Levy, A. L. Studies in the azole series. Part XXV. The action of bases on 2-thio-5-thiazolidone. J. Chem. Soc. 1950, 637− 642. (62) Kato, H.; Higashimura, T.; Okamura, S. Condensation polymerization of N-dithiocarbonyl alkoxyearbonyl amino acids. Part V. Studies on reaction mechanism. Makromol. Chem. 1967, 109, 9−21. (63) Dewey, R. S.; Schoenewaldt, E. F.; Joshua, H.; Paleveda, W. J.; Schwam, H.; Barkemeyer, H.; Arison, B. H.; Veber, D. F.; Denkewalter, R. G.; Hirschmann, R. Synthesis of peptides in aqueous medium. V. Preparation and use of 2,5-thiazolidinediones (NTA’s). Use of the 13C-H nuclear magnetic resonance signal as internal standard for quantitative studies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 3254− 3255. (64) Hirschmann, R.; Dewey, R. S.; Schoenewaldt, E. F.; Joshua, H.; Paleveda, W. J.; Schwam, H.; Barkemeyer, H.; Arison, B. H.; Veber, D. F. Synthesis of peptides in aqueous medium. VII. Preparation and use of 2,5-thiazolidinediones in peptide synthesis. J. Org. Chem. 1971, 36, 49−59. (65) Kricheldorf, H. R. Zur weiteren Kenntnis der Oxazolidindione(2.5) und Thiazolidindione-(2.5). Chem. Ber. 1971, 104, 3146−3155. (66) Kricheldorf, H. R. Ü ber die Polymerisation von α-AminosäureN-carboxyanhydriden (1,3-Oxazolidin-2,5-dionen) und α-AminosäureN-thiocarboxyanhydriden (1,3-Thiazolidin-2,5-dionen). Makromol. Chem. 1974, 175, 3325−3342. (67) Kricheldorf, H. R.; Bösinger, K. Mechanismus der NCAPolymerisation, 3. Ü ber die Amin katalysierte Polymerisation von Sarkosin-NCA und -NTA. Makromol. Chem. 1976, 177, 1243−1258. (68) Kricheldorf, H. R.; Sell, M.; Schwarz, G. Primary AmineInitiated Polymerizations of α-Amino Acid N-Thiocarbonic Acid Anhydrosulfide. J. Macromol. Sci., Part A: Pure Appl.Chem. 2008, 45, 425−430. (69) Tao, X.; Deng, C.; Ling, J. PEG-Amine-Initiated Polymerization of Sarcosine N-Thiocarboxyanhydrides Toward Novel Double-Hydrophilic PEG-b-Polysarcosine Diblock Copolymers. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2014, 35, 875−881. (70) Tao, X.; Deng, Y.; Shen, Z.; Ling, J. Controlled Polymerization of N-Substituted Glycine N-Thiocarboxyanhydrides Initiated by Rare Earth Borohydrides toward Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Polypeptoids. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 6173−6180. (71) Lahasky, S. H.; Hu, X.; Zhang, D. Thermoresponsive Poly(αpeptoid)s: Tuning the Cloud Point Temperatures by Composition and Architecture. ACS Macro Lett. 2012, 1, 580−584. (72) Lahasky, S. H.; Lu, L.; Huberty, W. A.; Cao, J.; Guo, L.; Garno, J. C.; Zhang, D. Synthesis and characterization of thermo-responsive polypeptoid bottlebrushes. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5, 1418−1426. (73) Guo, L.; Zhang, D. Cyclic poly(alpha-peptoid)s and their block copolymers from N-heterocyclic carbene-mediated ring-opening polymerizations of N-substituted N-carboxylanhydrides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 18072−18074. (74) Gangloff, N.; Fetsch, C.; Luxenhofer, R. Polypeptoids by Living Ring-Opening Polymerization of N-Substituted N-Carboxyanhydrides from Solid Supports. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2013, 34, 997−1001. (75) Grossmann A., Ph.D. thesis, Poly(β-peptoid)e, Technische Universität Dresden, 2014. (76) Birkofer, L.; Kachel, H. Synthese eines N-Carboxy-β-aminosäureanhydrids. Naturwissenschaften 1954, 41, 576−576. (77) Birkofer, L.; Modic, R. N-Carboxy-β-Aminosäure-Anhydride und ihre Polymerisation. Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1957, 604, 56−62. 1793


Chemical Reviews

Review

(78) Zilkha, A.; Burstein, Y. Synthesis and polymerization of Ncarboxyanhydrides of N-benzyl-beta-amino acids. Biopolymers 1964, 2, 147−161. (79) Grossmann, A.; Luxenhofer, R. Living polymerization of Nsubstituted β-alanine N-carboxyanhydrides: Kinetic investigations and preparation of an amphiphilic block copoly-β-peptoid. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2012, 33, 1714−1719. (80) Jia, L.; Sun, H.; Shay, J. T.; Allgeier, A. M.; Hanton, S. D. Living alternating copolymerization of N-alkylaziridines and carbon monoxide as a route for synthesis of poly-beta-peptoids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 7282−7283. (81) Darensbourg, D. J.; Phelps, A. L.; Le Gall, N.; Jia, L. Mechanistic studies of the copolymerization reaction of aziridines and carbon monoxide to produce poly-β-peptoids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 13808−13815. (82) Liu, G.; Jia, L. Cobalt-Catalyzed Carbonylative Copolymerization of N-Alkylazetidines and Tetrahydrofuran. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 129−131. (83) Chai, J.; Liu, G.; Chaicharoen, K.; Wesdemiotis, C.; Jia, L. Cobalt-Catalyzed Carbonylative Polymerization of Azetidines. Macromolecules 2008, 41, 8980−8985. (84) Lee, J. T.; Alper, H. Alternating Copolymerization of Propylene Oxide and Carbon Monoxide to form Aliphatic Polyesters. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 2417−2421. (85) Nakano, K.; Fumitaka, K.; Nozaki, K. Synthesis of a polyester macromonomer via the cobalt-catalyzed alternating copolymerization of propylene oxide and carbon monoxide. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2004, 42, 4666−4670. (86) Komine, N.; Tanaka, S.-I.; Tsutsuminai, S.; Akahane, Y.; Hirano, M.; Komiya, S. Copolymerization of aziridines and carbon monoxide catalyzed by a heterodinuclear organopalladinum-cobalt complex. Chem. Lett. 2004, 33, 858−859. (87) Zhao, J.; Ding, E.; Allgeier, A. M.; Jia, L. Cobalt-catalyzed alternating and nonalternating copolymerization of carbon monoxide with aziridine. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2003, 41, 376−385. (88) Merrifield, R. B. Solid phase peptide synthesis. I. The synthesis of a tetrapeptide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 2149−2154. (89) Simon, R. J.; Kania, R. S.; Zuckermann, R. N.; Huebner, V. D.; Jewell, D. A.; Banville, S.; Ng, S.; Wang, L.; Rosenberg, S.; Marlowe, C. K.; Spellmeyer, D. C.; Tan, R.; Frankel, A. D.; Santi, D. V.; Cohen, F. E.; Bartlett, P. A.; et al. Peptoids: a modular approach to drug discovery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992, 89, 9367−9371. (90) Meyer, J.-P.; Davis, P.; Lee, K. B.; Porreca, F.; Yamamura, H. I.; Hruby, V. J. Synthesis Using a Fmoc-Based Strategy and Biological Activities of Some Reduced Peptide Bond Pseudopeptide Analogs of Dynorphin A. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 3462−3468. (91) Tal-Gan, Y.; Freeman, N. S.; Klein, S.; Levitzki, A.; Gilon, C. Synthesis and structure−activity relationship studies of peptidomimetic PKB/Akt inhibitors: The significance of backbone interactions. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 2976−2985. (92) Zuckermann, R. N.; Kerr, J. M.; Kent, S. B. H.; Moos, W. H. Efficient method for the preparation of peptoids [oligo(N-substituted glycines)] by submonomer solid-phase synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10646−10647. (93) Burkoth, T. S.; Fafarman, A. T.; Charych, D. H.; Connolly, M. D.; Zuckermann, R. N. Incorporation of Unprotected Heterocyclic Side Chains into Peptoid Oligomers via Solid-Phase Submonomer Synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 8841−8845. (94) Vézina-Dawod, S.; Derson, A.; Biron, E. N-Substituted arylsulfonamide building blocks as alternative submonomers for peptoid synthesis. Tetrahedron Lett. 2015, 56, 382−385. (95) Li, S.; Bowerman, D.; Marthandan, N.; Klyza, S.; Luebke, K. J.; Garner, H. R.; Kodadek, T. Photolithographic Synthesis of Peptoids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4088−4089. (96) Hamper, B. C.; Kolodziej, S. A.; Scates, A. M.; Smith, R. G.; Cortez, E. Solid Phase Synthesis of beta-Peptoids: N-Substituted betaAminopropionic Acid Oligomers. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 708−718.

(97) Shuey, S. W.; Delaney, W. J.; Shah, M. C.; Scialdone, M. A. Antimicrobial β-peptoids by a block synthesis approach. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 1245−1248. (98) Norgren, A. S.; Zhang, S.; Arvidsson, P. I. Synthesis and circular dichroism spectroscopic investigations of oligomeric β-peptoids with α-chiral side chains. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4533−4536. (99) Marsden, H. R.; Handgraaf, J. W.; Nudelman, F.; Sommerdijk, N. A.; Kros, A. Uniting polypeptides with sequence-designed peptides: synthesis and assembly of poly(γ-benzyl L-glutamate)-b-coiled-coil peptide copolymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 2370−2377. (100) Angot, S.; Ayres, N.; Bon, S. A. F.; Haddleton, D. M. Living radical polymerization immobilized on Wang resins: synthesis and harvest of narrow polydispersity poly(methacrylate)s. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 768−774. (101) Frank, R. Spot-synthesis: an easy technique for the positionally addressable, parallel chemical synthesis on a membrane support. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 9217−9232. (102) Frank, R. The SPOT-synthesis technique: synthetic peptide arrays on membrane supports - principles and applications. J. Immunol. Methods 2002, 267, 13−26. (103) Heine, N.; Ast, T.; Schneider-Mergener, J.; Reineke, U.; Germeroth, L.; Wenschuh, H. Synthesis and screening of peptoid arrays on cellulose membranes. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 9919−9930. (104) Reddy, M. M.; Kodadek, T. Protein “fingerprinting” in complex mixtures with peptoid microarrays. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005, 102, 12672−12677. (105) Reddy, M. M.; Wilson, R.; Wilson, J.; Connell, S.; Gocke, A.; Hynan, L.; German, D.; Kodadek, T. Identification of Candidate IgG Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease via Combinatorial Library Screening. Cell 2011, 144, 132−142. (106) Labuda, L. P.; Pushechnikov, A.; Disney, M. D. Small Molecule Microarrays of RNA-Focused Peptoids Help Identify Inhibitors of a Pathogenic Group I Intron. ACS Chem. Biol. 2009, 4, 299−307. (107) Kwon, Y.-U.; Kodadek, T. Encoded combinatorial libraries for the construction of cyclic peptoid microarrays. Chem. Commun. 2008, 5704−5706. (108) Zuckermann, R. N.; Martin, E. J.; Spellmeyer, D. C.; Stauber, G. B.; Shoemaker, K. R.; Kerr, J. M.; Figliozzi, G. M.; Goff, D. A.; Siani, M. A. Discovery of Nanomolar Ligands for 7-Transmembrane GProtein-Coupled Receptors from a Diverse N-(Substituted)glycine Peptoid Library. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 2678−2685. (109) Burkoth, T. S.; Beausoleil, E.; Kaur, S.; Tang, D.; Cohen, F. E.; Zuckermann, R. N. Toward the Synthesis of Artificial Proteins: The Discovery of an Amphiphilic Helical Peptoid Assembly. Chem. Biol. 2002, 9, 647−654. (110) Alluri, P. G.; Reddy, M. M.; Bachhawat-Sikder, K.; Olivos, H. J.; Kodadek, T. Isolation of Protein Ligands from Large Peptoid Libraries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13995−14004. (111) Reddy, M. M.; Bachhawat-Sikder, K.; Kodadek, T. Transformation of Low-Affinity Lead Compounds into High-Affinity Protein Capture Agents. Chem. Biol. 2004, 11, 1127−1137. (112) Masip, I.; Cortés, N.; Abad, M.; Guardiola, M.; Pérez-Payá, E.; Ferragut, J.; Ferrer-Montiel, A.; Messeguer, A. Design and synthesis of an optimized positional scanning library of peptoids: identification of novel multidrug resistance reversal agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005, 13, 1923−1929. (113) Humet, M.; Carbonell, T.; Masip, I.; Sánchez-Baeza, F.; Mora, P.; Cantón, E.; Gobernado, M.; Abad, C.; Pérez-Payá, E.; Messeguer, A. A positional scanning combinatorial library of peptoids as a source of biological active molecules: identification of antimicrobials. J. Comb. Chem. 2003, 5, 597−605. (114) Kawakami, T.; Murakami, H.; Suga, H. Ribosomal synthesis of polypeptoids and peptoid-peptide hybrids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 16861−16863. (115) Kawakami, T.; Sasaki, T.; Reid, P. C.; Murakami, H. Incorporation of electrically charged N-alkyl amino acids into ribosomally synthesized peptides via post-translational conversion. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 887−893. 1794


Chemical Reviews

Review

(116) Kricheldorf, H. R.; Von Lossow, C.; Schwarz, G. Tertiary amine catalyzed polymerizations of α-amino acid N-carboxyanhydrides: The role of cyclization. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2006, 44, 4680−4695. (117) Kricheldorf, H. R.; Lossow, C. V.; Lomadze, N.; Schwarz, G. Cyclic polypeptides by thermal polymerization of a-amino acid Ncarboxyanhydrides. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2008, 46, 4012−4020. (118) Kricheldorf, H. R.; von Lossow, C.; Schwarz, G. Cyclic Polypeptides by Solvent-Induced Polymerizations of α-Amino Acid NCarboxyanhydrides. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 5513−5518. (119) Connor, E. F.; Nyce, G. W.; Myers, M.; Möck, A.; Hedrick, J. L. First Example of N-Heterocyclic Carbenes as Catalysts for Living Polymerization: Organocatalytic Ring-Opening Polymerization of Cyclic Esters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 914−915. (120) Nederberg, F.; Lohmeijer, B. G. G.; Leibfarth, F.; Pratt, R. C.; Choi, J.; Dove, A. P.; Waymouth, R. M.; Hedrick, J. L. Organocatalytic Ring Opening Polymerization of Trimethylene Carbonate. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8, 153−160. (121) Rodriguez, M.; Marrot, S.; Kato, T.; Stérin, S.; Fleury, E.; Baceiredo, A. Catalytic activity of N-heterocyclic carbenes in ring opening polymerization of cyclic siloxanes. J. Organomet. Chem. 2007, 692, 705−708. (122) Raynaud, J.; Absalon, C.; Gnanou, Y.; Taton, D. NHeterocyclic Carbene-Induced Zwitterionic Ring-Opening Polymerization of Ethylene Oxide and Direct Synthesis of α,ω-Difunctionalized Poly(ethylene oxide)s and Poly(ethylene oxide)-b-poly(εcaprolactone) Block Copolymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 3201−3209. (123) Raynaud, J.; Absalon, C.; Gnanou, Y.; Taton, D. NHeterocyclic Carbene-Organocatalyzed Ring-Opening Polymerization of Ethylene Oxide in the Presence of Alcohols or Trimethylsilyl Nucleophiles as Chain Moderators for the Synthesis of α,ωHeterodifunctionalized Poly(ethylene oxide)s. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 2814−2823. (124) Yoo, B.; Shin, S. B.; Huang, M. L.; Kirshenbaum, K. Peptoid macrocycles: making the rounds with peptidomimetic oligomers. Chem. - Eur. J. 2010, 16, 5528−5537. (125) Tedesco, C.; Erra, L.; Izzo, I.; De Riccardis, F. Solid state assembly of cyclic α-peptoids. CrystEngComm 2014, 16, 3667−3687. (126) Dale, J.; Titlestad, K. Cyclic oligopeptides of sarcosine (Nmethylglycine). J. Chem. Soc. D 1969, 656−659. (127) Titlestad, K.; Groth, P.; Dale, J.; Ali, M. Y. Unique conformation of the cyclic octapeptide of sarcosine and a related depsipeptide. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1973, 346−347. (128) Alvarez, M. A.; Saavedra, E. J.; Olivella, M. S.; Suvire, F. D.; Zamora, M. A.; Enriz, R. D. Theoretical study of the conformational energy hypersurface of cyclotrisarcosyl. Cent. Eur. J. Chem. 2012, 10, 248−255. (129) Sisido, M.; Imanishi, Y.; Higashimura, T. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of poly(N-alkylamino acid)s. Biopolymers 1972, 11, 399−408. (130) Shin, S. B.; Yoo, B.; Todaro, L. J.; Kirshenbaum, K. Cyclic peptoids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 3218−3225. (131) Culf, A. S.; Č uperlović-Culf, M.; Léger, D. A.; Decken, A. Small Head-to-Tail Macrocyclic α-Peptoids. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 2780−2783. (132) Hjelmgaard, T.; Roy, O.; Nauton, L.; El-Ghozzi, M.; Avignant, D.; Didierjean, C.; Taillefumier, C.; Faure, S. Macrocyclic arylopeptoids − a novel type of cyclic N-alkylated aromatic oligoamides forming nanotubular assemblies. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 3564−3567. (133) Chirayil, S.; Luebke, K. J. Cyclization of peptoids by formation of boronate esters. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 726−729. (134) Holub, J. M.; Jang, H.; Kirshenbaum, K. Fit To Be Tied: Conformation-Directed Macrocyclization of Peptoid Foldamers. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3275−3278. (135) Khan, S. N.; Kim, A.; Grubbs, R. H.; Kwon, Y.-U. Ring-Closing Metathesis Approaches for the Solid-Phase Synthesis of Cyclic Peptoids. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 1582−1585.

(136) Park, S.; Kwon, Y.-U. Facile Solid-Phase Parallel Synthesis of Linear and Cyclic Peptoids for Comparative Studies of Biological Activity. ACS Comb. Sci. 2015, 17, 196−201. (137) Kaniraj, P. J.; Maayan, G. A Facile Strategy for the Construction of Cyclic Peptoids under Microwave Irradiation through a Simple Substitution Reaction. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 2110−2113. (138) Lee, K. J.; Lim, H.-S. Facile Method To Sequence Cyclic Peptides/Peptoids via One-Pot Ring-Opening/Cleavage Reaction. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 5710−5713. (139) Lee, J. H.; Meyer, A. M.; Lim, H.-S. A simple strategy for the construction of combinatorial cyclic peptoid libraries. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 8615−8617. (140) Maulucci, N.; Izzo, I.; Bifulco, G.; Aliberti, A.; De Cola, C.; Comegna, D.; Gaeta, C.; Napolitano, A.; Pizza, C.; Tedesco, C.; Flot, D.; De Riccardis, F. Synthesis, structures, and properties of nine-, twelve-, and eighteen-membered N-benzyloxyethyl cyclic α-peptoids. Chem. Commun. 2008, 3927−3929. (141) Salvador, C. E. M.; Pieber, B.; Neu, P. M.; Torvisco, A.; Kleber Z. Andrade, C.; Kappe, C. O. A Sequential Ugi Multicomponent/CuCatalyzed Azide−Alkyne Cycloaddition Approach for the Continuous Flow Generation of Cyclic Peptoids. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 4590− 4602. (142) Roy, O.; Faure, S.; Thery, V.; Didierjean, C.; Taillefumier, C. Cyclic beta-peptoids. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 921−924. (143) Caumes, C.; Fernandes, C.; Roy, O.; Hjelmgaard, T.; Wenger, E.; Didierjean, C.; Taillefumier, C.; Faure, S. Cyclic α,β-Tetrapeptoids: Sequence-Dependent Cyclization and Conformational Preference. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 3626−3629. (144) Nnanabu, E.; Burgess, K. Cyclic Semipeptoids: Peptoid− Organic Hybrid Macrocycles. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1259−1262. (145) Lee, J. H.; Kim, H.-S.; Lim, H.-S. Design and Facile SolidPhase Synthesis of Conformationally Constrained Bicyclic Peptoids. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 5012−5015. (146) Vollrath, S. B. L.; Bräse, S.; Kirshenbaum, K. Twice tied tight: Enforcing conformational order in bicyclic peptoid oligomers. Chem. Sci. 2012, 3, 2726−2731. (147) Aoi, K.; Hatanaka, T.; Tsutsumiuchi, K.; Okada, M.; Imae, T. Synthesis of a novel star-shaped dendrimer by radial-growth polymerization of sarcosine N-carboxyanhydride initiated with poly(trimethyleneimine) dendrimer. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 1999, 20, 378−382. (148) Nakamura, R.; Aoi, K.; Okada, M. Interactions of enzymes and a lectin with a chitin-based graft copolymer having polysarcosine side chains. Macromol. Biosci. 2004, 4, 610−615. (149) Nakamura, R.; Aoi, K.; Okada, M. Controlled Synthesis of a Chitosan-Based Graft Copolymer Having Polysarcosine Side Chains Using the NCA Method with a Carboxylic Acid Additive. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2006, 27, 1725−1732. (150) Schneider, M.; Fetsch, C.; Amin, I.; Jordan, R.; Luxenhofer, R. Polypeptoid Brushes by Surface Initiated Polymerization of NSubstituted N-Carboxyanhydrides. Langmuir 2013, 29, 6983−6988. (151) Schneider, M.; Tang, Z.; Richter, M.; Marschelke, C.; Amin, I.; Braun, H.; Luxenhofer, R.; Jordan, R.et al. Patterned Polymer Brushes. Macromol. Biosci. 2015, in print, 10.1002/mabi.201500314. (152) Hörtz C., Ph.D. thesis, Synthese und Charakterisierung von zylindrischen Bürsten mit polypept(o)idischen Seitenketten als nanopartikuläre Trägersysteme, Johannes-Gutenberg Universität Mainz, 2014. (153) Hörtz, C.; Birke, A.; Kaps, L.; Decker, S.; Wächtersbach, E.; Fischer, K.; Schuppan, D.; Barz, M.; Schmidt, M. Cylindrical Brush Polymers with Polysarcosine Side Chains: A Novel Biocompatible Carrier for Biomedical Applications. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 2074− 2086. (154) Polymer Brushes: Synthesis, Characterization, Applications; Advincula, R. C., Brittain Willian, J, Caster, K. C., Rühe, J., Eds.; Wiley VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2005. (155) Gao, W.; Liu, W.; Mackay, J. A.; Zalutsky, M. R.; Toone, E. J.; Chilkoti, A. In situ growth of a stoichiometric PEG-like conjugate at a 1795


Chemical Reviews

Review

Poly(N-Propargyl Glycine). Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2015, 216, 2080− 2085. (178) Holub, J. M.; Jang, H.; Kirshenbaum, K. Clickity-click: highly functionalized peptoid oligomers generated by sequential conjugation reactions on solid-phase support. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 1497− 1502. (179) Jang, H.; Fafarman, A.; Holub, J. M.; Kirshenbaum, K. Click to Fit: Versatile Polyvalent Display on a Peptidomimetic Scaffold. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1951−1954. (180) Norgren, A. S.; Budke, C.; Majer, Z.; Heggemann, C.; Koop, T.; Sewald, N. On-resin click-glycoconjugation of peptoids. Synthesis 2009, 2009, 488−494. (181) Levine, P. M.; Craven, T. W.; Bonneau, R.; Kirshenbaum, K. Semisynthesis of Peptoid−Protein Hybrids by Chemical Ligation at Serine. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 512−515. (182) Dimitrov, I.; Trzebicka, B.; Müller, A. H. E.; Dworak, A.; Tsvetanov, C. B. Thermosensitive water-soluble copolymers with doubly responsive reversibly interacting entities. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2007, 32, 1275−1343. (183) Aseyev, V.; Tenhu, H.; Winnik, F. M. Non-ionic Thermoresponsive Polymers in Water. Adv. Polym. Sci. 2010, 242, 29−89. (184) Park, J. S.; Kataoka, K. Precise control of lower critical solution temperature of thermosensitive poly (2-isopropyl-2-oxazoline) via gradient copolymerization with 2-ethyl-2-oxazoline as a hydrophilic comonomer. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 6622−6630. (185) Huber, S.; Jordan, R. Modulation of the lower critical solution temperature of 2-alkyl-2-oxazoline copolymers. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2008, 286, 395−402. (186) Zhang, N.; Luxenhofer, R.; Jordan, R. Thermo-responsive poly(2-oxazoline) molecular brushes by living ionic polymerization: Modulation of the cloud point by random and block copolymer pendant chains. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2012, 213, 1963−1969. (187) Bloksma, M. M.; Bakker, D. J.; Weber, C.; Hoogenboom, R.; Schubert, U. S. The Effect of Hofmeister Salts on the LCST Transition of Poly(2-oxazoline)s with Varying Hydrophilicity. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2010, 31, 724−728. (188) Christova, D.; Velichkova, R.; Loos, W.; Goethals, E. J.; Prez, F. D. New thermo-responsive polymer materials based on poly(2ethyl-2-oxazoline) segments. Polymer 2003, 44, 2255−2261. (189) Tao, X.; Du, J.; Wang, Y.; Ling, J. Polypeptoids with Tunable Cloud Point Temperatures Synthesized from N-Substituted Glycine N-Thiocarboxyanhydrides. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 3164−3174. (190) Birke, A.; Huesmann, D.; Kelsch, A.; Weilbacher, M.; Xie, J.; Bros, M.; Bopp, T.; Becker, C.; Landfester, K.; Barz, M. Polypeptoidblock-Polypeptide copolymers: Synthesis, Characterization and Application of Amphiphilic Block Copolypeptides in Drug Formulations and Miniemulsion Techniques. Biomacromolecules 2014, 15, 548−557. (191) Secker C., Ph.D. thesis, Polypeptoid Block Copolymers: Synthesis, Modification, and Structure Formation, Universität Potsdam, 2014. (192) Chen, X.; Ayres, N. Synthesis of low grafting density molecular brush from a poly(N-alkyl urea peptoid) backbone. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2011, 49, 3030−3037. (193) Brosnan, S. M.; Schlaad, H.; Antonietti, M. Aqueous SelfAssembly of Purely Hydrophilic Block Copolymers into Giant Vesicles. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 9715−9718. (194) Lee, C.-U.; Lu, L.; Chen, J.; Garno, J. C.; Zhang, D. Crystallization-Driven Thermoreversible Gelation of Coil-Crystalline Cyclic and Linear Diblock Copolypeptoids. ACS Macro Lett. 2013, 2, 436−440. (195) Kanzaki, T.; Horikawa, Y.; Makino, A.; Sugiyama, J.; Kimura, S. Nanotube and three-way nanotube formation with nonionic amphiphilic block peptides. Macromol. Biosci. 2008, 8, 1026−1033. (196) Ueda, M.; Makino, A.; Imai, T.; Sugiyama, J.; Kimura, S. Rational design of peptide nanotubes for varying diameters and lengths. J. Pept. Sci. 2011, 17, 94−99.

protein’s N-terminus with significantly improved pharmacokinetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106, 15231−15236. (156) Zhang, N.; Luxenhofer, R.; Jordan, R. Thermo-responsive poly(2-oxazoline) molecular brushes by living ionic polymerization: Modulation of the cloud point by random and block copolymer pendant chains. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2012, 213, 1963−1969. (157) Zhang, N.; Luxenhofer, R.; Jordan, R. Thermo-responsive poly(2-oxazoline) molecular brushes by living ionic polymerization: Kinetic investigations of pendant chain grafting and cloud point modulation by backbone and side chain length variation. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2012, 213, 973−981. (158) Zhang, N.; Huber, S.; Schulz, A.; Luxenhofer, R.; Jordan, R. Cylindrical Molecular Brushes of Poly (2-oxazoline) s from 2Isopropenyl-2-oxazoline. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 2215−2221. (159) Milner, S. T. Polymer brushes. Science 1991, 251, 905−914. (160) Edmondson, S.; Osborne, V. L.; Huck, W. T. Polymer brushes via surface-initiated polymerizations. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2004, 33, 14−22. (161) Brittain, W. J.; Minko, S. A structural definition of polymer brushes. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2007, 45, 3505−3512. (162) Chen, T.; Amin, I.; Jordan, R. Patterned polymer brushes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 3280−3296. (163) Zhang, N.; Steenackers, M.; Luxenhofer, R.; Jordan, R. BottleBrush Brushes: Cylindrical Molecular Brushes of Poly (2-oxazoline) on Glassy Carbon. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 5345−5351. (164) Hutter, N. A.; Steenackers, M.; Reitinger, A.; Williams, O. A.; Garrido, J. A.; Jordan, R. Nanostructured polymer brushes and protein density gradients on diamond by carbon templating. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 4861−4867. (165) Zhang, N.; Pompe, T.; Amin, I.; Luxenhofer, R.; Werner, C.; Jordan, R. Tailored polymer brushes of poly(2-oxazoline)s to control the protein adsorption and cell adhesion. Macromol. Biosci. 2012, 12, 926−936. (166) Chang, Y. C.; Frank, C. W. Grafting of poly (γ-benzyl-lglutamate) on chemically modified silicon oxide surfaces. Langmuir 1996, 12, 5824−5829. (167) Wang, J.; Gibson, M. I.; Barbey, R.; Xiao, S.-J.; Klok, H.-A. Nonfouling Polypeptide Brushes via Surface-initiated Polymerization of Nε-oligo(ethylene glycol)succinate-L-lysine N-carboxyanhydride. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2009, 30, 845−850. (168) Lee, N. H.; Frank, C. W. Surface-Initiated Vapor Polymerization of Various α-Amino Acids. Langmuir 2003, 19, 1295−1303. (169) Lee, N. H.; Christensen, L. M.; Frank, C. W. Morphology of Vapor-Deposited Poly(α-amino acid) Films. Langmuir 2003, 19, 3525−3530. (170) Zheng, W.; Frank, C. W. Surface-Initiated Vapor Deposition Polymerization of Poly(γ-benzyl-l-glutamate): Optimization and Mechanistic Studies. Langmuir 2010, 26, 3929−3941. (171) Lee, H.; Pietrasik, J.; Sheiko, S. S.; Matyjaszewski, K. Stimuliresponsive molecular brushes. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2010, 35, 24−44. (172) Dimitrov, I.; Schlaad, H. Synthesis of nearly monodisperse polystyrene-polypeptide block copolymers via polymerisation of Ncarboxyanhydrides. Chem. Commun. 2003, 23, 2944−2945. (173) Meyer, M.; Schlaad, H. Poly(2-isopropyl-2-oxazoline)−Poly(Lglutamate) Block Copolymers through Ammonium-Mediated NCA Polymerization. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 3967−3970. (174) van Hest, J. C. M.; Delnoye, D. A. P.; Baars, M. W. P. L.; van Genderen, M. H. P.; Meijer, E. W. Polystyrene-Dendrimer Amphiphilic Block Copolymers with a Generation-Dependent Aggregation. Science 1995, 268, 1592−1595. (175) Aoi, K.; Motoda, A.; Okada, M.; Imae, T. Novel amphiphilic linear polymer/dendrimer block copolymer: Synthesis of poly(2methyl-2-oxazoline)-block-poly(amido amine) dendrimer. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 1997, 18, 945−952. (176) Gheybi, H.; Adeli, M. Supramolecular anticancer drug delivery systems based on linear−dendritic copolymers. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 2580−2615. (177) Secker, C.; Brosnan, S. M.; Limberg, F. R. P.; Braun, U.; Trunk, M.; Strauch, P.; Schlaad, H. Thermally Induced Crosslinking of 1796


Chemical Reviews

Review

(217) Shin, I.; Park, K. Solution-Phase Synthesis of Aminooxy Peptoids in the C to N and N to C Directions. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 869− 872. (218) Gao, Y.; Kodadek, T. Synthesis and Screening of Stereochemically Diverse Combinatorial Libraries of Peptide Tertiary Amides. Chem. Biol. 2013, 20, 360−369. (219) Aditya, A.; Kodadek, T. Incorporation of Heterocycles into the Backbone of Peptoids to Generate Diverse Peptoid-Inspired One Bead One Compound Libraries. ACS Comb. Sci. 2012, 14, 164−169. (220) Suwal, S.; Kodadek, T. Synthesis of libraries of peptidomimetic compounds containing a 2-oxopiperazine unit in the main chain. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 2088−2092. (221) Rivera, D. G.; León, F.; Concepción, O.; Morales, F. E.; Wessjohann, L. A. A multiple multicomponent approach to chimeric peptide-peptoid podands. Chem.−Eur. J. 2013, 19, 6417−6428. (222) Diaz-Mochon, J. J.; Fara, M. A.; Sanchez-Martin, R. M.; Bradley, M. Peptoid dendrimersmicrowave-assisted solid-phase synthesis and transfection agent evaluation. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 923−926. (223) Peschko, K.; Schade, A.; Vollrath, S. B. L.; Schwarz, U.; Luy, B.; Muhle-Goll, C.; Weis, P.; Bräse, S. Dendrimer-Type PeptoidDecorated Hexaphenylxylenes and Tetraphenylmethanes: Synthesis and Structure in Solution and in the Gas Phase. Chem. - Eur. J. 2014, 20, 16273−16278. (224) Sehlinger, A.; Dannecker, P.-K.; Kreye, O.; Meier, M. A. Diversely Substituted Polyamides: Macromolecular Design Using the Ugi Four-Component Reaction. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 2774−2783. (225) Sehlinger, A.; Schneider, R.; Meier, M. A. Ugi Reactions with CO2: Access to Functionalized Polyurethanes, Polycarbonates, Polyamides, and Polyhydantoins. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2014, 35, 1866−1871. (226) Gangloff, N.; Nahm, D.; Döring, L.; Kuckling, D.; Luxenhofer, R. Polymerization via the Ugi-reaction using aromatic monomers. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2015, 53, 1680−1686. (227) Sisido, M.; Imanishi, Y.; Higashimura, T. Static and Dynamic Studies on the End-to-End Intrachain Energy Transfer on a Polysarcosine Chain. Macromolecules 1979, 12, 975−980. (228) Sui, Q.; Borchardt, D.; Rabenstein, D. L. Kinetics and equilibria of cis/trans isomerization of backbone amide bonds in peptoids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 12042−12048. (229) Armand, P.; Kirshenbaum, K.; Falicov, A.; Dunbrack, R. L.; Dill, K. A.; Zuckermann, R. N.; Cohen, F. E. Chiral N-substituted glycines can form stable helical conformations. Folding Des. 1997, 2, 369−375. (230) Armand, P.; Kirshenbaum, K.; Goldsmith, R. A.; Farr-Jones, S.; Barron, A. E.; Truong, K. T.; Dill, K. A.; Mierke, D. F.; Cohen, F. E.; Zuckermann, R. N.; Bradley, E. K. NMR determination of the major solution conformation of a peptoid pentamer with chiral side chains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1998, 95, 4309−4314. (231) Caumes, C.; Roy, O.; Faure, S.; Taillefumier, C. The Click Triazolium Peptoid Side Chain: A Strong cis-Amide Inducer Enabling Chemical Diversity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 9553−9556. (232) Roy, O.; Caumes, C.; Esvan, Y.; Didierjean, C.; Faure, S.; Taillefumier, C. The tert-Butyl Side Chain: A Powerful Means to Lock Peptoid Amide Bonds in the Cis Conformation. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 2246−2249. (233) Gorske, B. C.; Stringer, J. R.; Bastian, B. L.; Fowler, S. A.; Blackwell, H. E. New strategies for the design of folded peptoids revealed by a survey of noncovalent interactions in model systems. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 16555−16567. (234) Gorske, B. C.; Nelson, R. C.; Bowden, Z. S.; Kufe, T. A.; Childs, A. M. Bridged” n→π* Interactions Can Stabilize Peptoid Helices. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 11172−11183. (235) Engel-Andreasen, J.; Wich, K.; Laursen, J. S.; Harris, P.; Olsen, C. A. Effects of Thionation and Fluorination on Cis−Trans Isomerization in Tertiary Amides: An Investigation of N-Alkylglycine (Peptoid) Rotamers. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 5415−5427. (236) Shah, N. H.; Butterfoss, G. L.; Nguyen, K.; Yoo, B.; Bonneau, R.; Rabenstein, D. L.; Kirshenbaum, K. Oligo(N-aryl glycines): a new

(197) Ueda, M.; Makino, A.; Imai, T.; Sugiyama, J.; Kimura, S. Transformation of peptide nanotubes into a vesicle via fusion driven by stereo-complex formation. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 3204−3206. (198) Ueda, M.; Makino, A.; Imai, T.; Sugiyama, J.; Kimura, S. Tubulation on peptide vesicles by phase-separation of a binary mixture of amphiphilic right-handed and left-handed helical peptides. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 4143−4146. (199) Ueda, M.; Makino, A.; Imai, T.; Sugiyama, J.; Kimura, S. Temperature-Triggered Fusion of Vesicles Composed of RightHanded and Left-Handed Amphiphilic Helical Peptides. Langmuir 2011, 27, 4300−4304. (200) Ueda, M.; Makino, A.; Imai, T.; Sugiyama, J.; Kimura, S. Versatile peptide rafts for conjugate morphologies by self-assembling amphiphilic helical peptides. Polym. J. 2013, 45, 509−515. (201) Matsui, H.; Ueda, M.; Makino, A.; Kimura, S. Molecular assembly composed of a dendrimer template and block polypeptides through stereocomplex formation. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 6181− 6183. (202) Uesaka, A.; Ueda, M.; Makino, A.; Imai, T.; Sugiyama, J.; Kimura, S. Self-Assemblies of Triskelion A2B-Type Amphiphilic Polypeptide Showing pH-Responsive Morphology Transformation. Langmuir 2012, 28, 6006−6012. (203) Douy, A.; Gallot, B. New amphipathic lipopeptides, 1. Synthesis and mesomorphic structures of lipopeptides with polysarcosine peptidic chains. Makromol. Chem. 1986, 187, 465−483. (204) Gervais, M.; Douy, A.; Gallot, B.; Erre, R. Surface analysis of lipopeptides using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: I. Lipopeptides with polysarcosine peptidic chains. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1988, 125, 146−154. (205) Gallot, B.; Hassan, H. H. Lyotropic Lipo-Amino-Acids: Synthesis and Structural Study. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 1989, 170, 195−214. (206) Rosales, A. M.; Murnen, H. K.; Zuckermann, R. N.; Segalman, R. A. Control of Crystallization and Melting Behavior in Sequence Specific Polypeptoids. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 5627−5636. (207) Rosales, A. M.; McCulloch, B. L.; Zuckermann, R. N.; Segalman, R. A. Tunable Phase Behavior of Polystyrene−Polypeptoid Block Copolymers. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 6027−6035. (208) Sun, J.; Teran, A. A.; Liao, X.; Balsara, N. P.; Zuckermann, R. N. Nanoscale phase separation in sequence-defined peptoid diblock copolymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 14119−14124. (209) Leibler, L. Theory of Microphase Separation in Block Copolymers. Macromolecules 1980, 13, 1602−1617. (210) Sun, J.; Liao, X.; Minor, A. M.; Balsara, N. P.; Zuckermann, R. N. Morphology-Conductivity Relationship in Crystalline and Amorphous Sequence-Defined Peptoid Block Copolymer Electrolytes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 14990−14997. (211) Izzo, I.; Ianniello, G.; De Cola, C.; Nardone, B.; Erra, L.; Vaughan, G.; Tedesco, C.; De Riccardis, F. Structural Effects of Proline Substitution and Metal Binding on Hexameric Cyclic Peptoids. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 598−601. (212) Vollrath, S. B. L.; Hu, C.; Bräse, S.; Kirshenbaum, K. Peptoid nanotubes: an oligomer macrocycle that reversibly sequesters water via single-crystal-to-single-crystal transformations. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 2317−2319. (213) Kruijtzer, J. A.; Lefeber, D. J.; Liskamp, R. M. Approaches to the synthesis of ureapeptoid peptidomimetics. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 5335−5338. (214) Wilson, M. E.; Nowick, J. S. An efficient synthesis of N,N′linked oligoureas. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 6613−6616. (215) Cheguillaume, A.; Lehardy, F.; Bouget, K.; Baudy-Floc'h, M.; Le Grel, P. Submonomer Solution Synthesis of Hydrazinoazapeptoids, a New Class of Pseudopeptides. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 2924−2927. (216) Liu, F.; Stephen, A. G.; Adamson, C. S.; Gousset, K.; Aman, M. J.; Freed, E. O.; Fisher, R. J.; Burke, T. R. Hydrazone- and HydrazideContaining N-Substituted Glycines as Peptoid Surrogates for Expedited Library Synthesis: Application to the Preparation of Tsg101-Directed HIV-1 Budding Antagonists. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5165−5168. 1797


Chemical Reviews

Review

twist on structured peptoids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 16622− 16632. (237) Jordan, P. A.; Paul, B.; Butterfoss, G. L.; Renfrew, P. D.; Bonneau, R.; Kirshenbaum, K. Oligo(N-alkoxy glycines): Trans substantiating peptoid conformations. Biopolymers 2011, 96, 617−626. (238) Crapster, J. A.; Stringer, J. R.; Guzei, I. A.; Blackwell, H. E. Design and conformational analysis of peptoids containing N-hydroxy amides reveals a unique sheet-like secondary structure. Biopolymers 2011, 96, 604−616. (239) Pauling, L.; Corey, R. B. Two hydrogen-bonded spiral configurations of the polypeptide chain. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1950, 72, 5349−5349. (240) Pauling, L.; Corey, R. B.; Branson, H. R. The structure of proteins: Two hydrogen-bonded helical configurations of the polypeptide chain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1951, 37, 205−211. (241) Berger, A.; Kurtz, J.; Katchalski, E. Poly-L-proline. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1954, 76, 5552−5554. (242) Kurtz, J.; Berger, A.; Katchalski, E. Mutarotation of poly-lproline. Nature 1956, 178, 1066−1067. (243) Kirshenbaum, K.; Barron, A. E.; Goldsmith, R. A.; Armand, P.; Bradley, E. K.; Truong, K. T.; Dill, K. A.; Cohen, F. E.; Zuckermann, R. N. Sequence-specific polypeptoids: a diverse family of heteropolymers with stable secondary structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1998, 95, 4303−4308. (244) Wu, C. W.; Sanborn, T. J.; Zuckermann, R. N.; Barron, A. E. Peptoid oligomers with α-chiral, aromatic side chains: effects of chain length on secondary structure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2958− 2963. (245) Wu, C. W.; Sanborn, T. J.; Huang, K.; Zuckermann, R. N.; Barron, A. E. Peptoid Oligomers with α-Chiral, Aromatic Side Chains: Sequence Requirements for the Formation of Stable Peptoid Helices. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6778−6784. (246) Kricheldorf, H. R. α-Aminoacid-N-Carboxyanhydrides and Related Materials; Springer: Berlin, 1987. (247) Wu, C. W.; Kirshenbaum, K.; Sanborn, T. J.; Patch, J. A.; Huang, K.; Dill, K. A.; Zuckermann, R. N.; Barron, A. E. Structural and Spectroscopic Studies of Peptoid Oligomers with α-Chiral Aliphatic Side Chains. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13525−13530. (248) Shin, H.-M.; Kang, C.-M.; Yoon, M.-H.; Seo, J. Peptoid helicity modulation: precise control of peptoid secondary structures via position-specific placement of chiral monomers. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 4465−4468. (249) Fasman, G. D.; Blout, E. R. Copolymers of L-proline and sarcosine: Synthesis and physical-chemical studies. Biopolymers 1963, 1, 99−109. (250) Guo, L.; Li, J.; Brown, Z.; Ghale, K.; Zhang, D. Synthesis and Characterization of Cyclic and Linear Helical Poly(alpha-peptoid)s by N-Heterocyclic Carbene-Mediated Ring-Opening Polymerizations of N-Substituted N-Carboxyanhydrides. Biopolymers 2011, 96, 596−603. (251) Sanborn, T. J.; Wu, C. W.; Zuckermann, R. N.; Barron, A. E. Extreme stability of helices formed by water-soluble poly-Nsubstituted glycines (polypeptoids) with alpha-chiral side chains. Biopolymers 2002, 63, 12−20. (252) Rosales, A. M.; Murnen, H. K.; Kline, S. R.; Zuckermann, R. N.; Segalman, R. A. Determination of the persistence length of helical and non-helical polypeptoids in solution. Soft Matter 2012, 8, 3673− 3680. (253) Stringer, J. R.; Crapster, J. A.; Guzei, I. A.; Blackwell, H. E. Extraordinarily robust polyproline type I peptoid helices generated via the incorporation of α-chiral aromatic N-1-naphthylethyl side chains. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 15559−15567. (254) Gorske, B. C.; Blackwell, H. E. Tuning Peptoid Secondary Structure with Pentafluoroaromatic Functionality: A New Design Paradigm for the Construction of Discretely Folded Peptoid Structures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14378−14387. (255) Vaz, B.; Brunsveld, L. Stable helical peptoids via covalent side chain to side chain cyclization. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 2988− 2994.

(256) Shin, S. B. Y.; Kirshenbaum, K. Conformational Rearrangements by Water-Soluble Peptoid Foldamers. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5003− 5006. (257) Seo, J.; Barron, A. E.; Zuckermann, R. N. Novel peptoid building blocks: synthesis of functionalized aromatic helix-inducing submonomers. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 492−495. (258) Kümin, M.; Sonntag, L.-S.; Wennemers, H. Azidoproline Containing Helices: Stabilization of the Polyproline II Structure by a Functionalizable Group. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 466−467. (259) Yu, Y. B. Coiled-coils: stability, specificity, and drug delivery potential. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2002, 54, 1113−1129. (260) Lupas, A. N.; Gruber, M. The Structure of α-Helical Coiled Coils. Adv. Protein Chem. 2005, 70, 37−38. (261) Xu, T.; Shu, J. Coiled-coil helix bundle, a peptide tertiary structural motif toward hybrid functional materials. Soft Matter 2010, 6, 212−217. (262) Sternberg, U.; Birtalan, E.; Jakovkin, I.; Luy, B.; Schepers, U.; Bräse, S.; Muhle-Goll, C. Structural characterization of a peptoid with lysine-like side chains and biological activity using NMR and computational methods. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 640−647. (263) Kang, B.; Chung, S.; Ahn, Y. D.; Lee, J.; Seo, J. Porphyrin− Peptoid Conjugates: Face-to-Face Display of Porphyrins on Peptoid Helices. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 1670−1673. (264) Laursen, J. S.; Harris, P.; Fristrup, P.; Olsen, C. A. Triangular prism-shaped [beta]-peptoid helices as unique biomimetic scaffolds. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7013. (265) Richardson, J. S. β-Sheet topology and the relatedness of proteins. Nature 1977, 268, 495−500. (266) Nam, K. T.; Shelby, S. A.; Choi, P. H.; Marciel, A. B.; Chen, R.; Tan, L.; Chu, T. K.; Mesch, R. A.; Lee, B. C.; Connolly, M. D.; Kisielowski, C.; Zuckermann, R. N. Free-floating ultrathin twodimensional crystals from sequence-specific peptoid polymers. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 454−460. (267) Krejchi, M. T.; Atkins, E. D.; Waddon, A. J.; Fournier, M. J.; Mason, T. L.; Tirrell, D. A. Chemical sequence control of beta-sheet assembly in macromolecular crystals of periodic polypeptides. Science 1994, 265, 1427−1432. (268) Crapster, J. A.; Guzei, I. A.; Blackwell, H. E. A Peptoid Ribbon Secondary Structure. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 5079−5084. (269) Karle, I. L.; Flippen-Anderson, J.; Sukumar, M.; Balaram, P. Conformation of a 16-residue zervamicin IIA analog peptide containing three different structural features: 3 (10)-helix, alphahelix, and beta-bend ribbon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1987, 84, 5087−5091. (270) Lewis, P. N.; Momany, F. A.; Scheraga, H. A. Folding of Polypeptide Chains in Proteins: A Proposed Mechanism for Folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1971, 68, 2293−2297. (271) Kuntz, I. D. Protein folding. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 4009− 4012. (272) Leszczynski, J. F.; Rose, G. D. Loops in Globular Proteins: A Novel Category of Secondary Structure. Science 1986, 234, 849−855. (273) Fiser, A.; Do, R. K. G.; Sali, A. Modeling of loops in protein structures. Protein Sci. 2000, 9, 1753−1773. (274) Shehu, A.; Kavraki, L. E. Modeling Structures and Motions of Loops in Protein Molecules. Entropy 2012, 14, 252−290. (275) Wheatley, M.; Wootten, D.; Conner, T.; Simms, J.; Kendrick, R.; Logan, T.; Poyner, R.; Barwell, J. Lifting the lid on GPCRs: the role of extracellular loops. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2012, 165, 1688−1703. (276) Stringer, J. R.; Crapster, J. A.; Guzei, I. A.; Blackwell, H. E. Construction of Peptoids with All Trans-Amide Backbones and Peptoid Reverse Turns via the Tactical Incorporation of N-Aryl Side Chains Capable of Hydrogen Bonding. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 6068− 6078. (277) Pokorski, J. K.; Miller Jenkins, L. M.; Feng, H.; Durell, S. R.; Bai, Y.; Appella, D. H. Introduction of a Triazole Amino Acid into a Peptoid Oligomer Induces Turn Formation in Aqueous Solution. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2381−2383. (278) Huang, K.; Wu, C. W.; Sanborn, T. J.; Patch, J. A.; Kirshenbaum, K.; Zuckermann, R. N.; Barron, A. E.; Radhakrishnan, 1798


Chemical Reviews

Review

I. A threaded loop conformation adopted by a family of peptoid nonamers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1733−1738. (279) Fowler, S. A.; Luechapanichkul, R.; Blackwell, H. E. Synthesis and Characterization of Nitroaromatic Peptoids: Fine Tuning Peptoid Secondary Structure through Monomer Position and Functionality. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 1440−1449. (280) Maayan, G.; Ward, M. D.; Kirshenbaum, K. Folded biomimetic oligomers for enantioselective catalysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106, 13679−13684. (281) Olsen, C. A.; Lambert, M.; Witt, M.; Franzyk, H.; Jaroszewski, J. W. Solid-phase peptide synthesis and circular dichroism study of chiral beta-peptoid homooligomers. Amino Acids 2008, 34, 465−471. (282) Olsen, C. A. β-Peptoid ″foldamers″ - Why the additional methylene unit? Biopolymers 2011, 96, 561−566. (283) Olsen, C. A.; Bonke, G.; Vedel, L.; Adsersen, A.; Witt, M.; Franzyk, H.; Jaroszewski, J. W. α-Peptide/β-Peptoid Chimeras. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1549−1552. (284) Vedel, L.; Bonke, G.; Foged, C.; Ziegler, H.; Franzyk, H.; Jaroszewski, J. W.; Olsen, C. A. Antiplasmodial and prehemolytic activities of α-peptide-β-peptoid chimeras. ChemBioChem 2007, 8, 1781−1784. (285) Foged, C.; Franzyk, H.; Bahrami, S.; Frokjaer, S.; Jaroszewski, J. W.; Nielsen, H. M.; Olsen, C. A. Cellular uptake and membranedestabilising properties of α-peptide/β-peptoid chimeras: lessons for the design of new cell-penetrating peptides. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Biomembr. 2008, 1778, 2487−2495. (286) Butterfoss, G. L.; Renfrew, P. D.; Kuhlman, B.; Kirshenbaum, K.; Bonneau, R. A preliminary survey of the peptoid folding landscape. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 16798−16807. (287) Butterfoss, G. L.; Yoo, B.; Jaworski, J. N.; Chorny, I.; Dill, K. A.; Zuckermann, R. N.; Bonneau, R.; Kirshenbaum, K.; Voelz, V. A. De novo structure prediction and experimental characterization of folded peptoid oligomers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109, 14320− 14325. (288) Mirijanian, D. T.; Mannige, R. V.; Zuckermann, R. N.; Whitelam, S. Development and use of an atomistic CHARMM-based forcefield for peptoid simulation. J. Comput. Chem. 2014, 35, 360−370. (289) Drew, K.; Renfrew, P. D.; Craven, T. W.; Butterfoss, G. L.; Chou, F.-C.; Lyskov, S.; Bullock, B. N.; Watkins, A.; Labonte, J. W.; Pacella, M.; Kilambi, K. P.; Leaver-Fay, A.; Kuhlman, B.; Gray, J. J.; Bradley, P.; Kirshenbaum, K.; Arora, P. S.; Das, R.; Bonneau, R. Adding diverse noncanonical backbones to rosetta: enabling peptidomimetic design. PLoS One 2013, 8, No. e67051. (290) Renfrew, P. D.; Craven, T. W.; Butterfoss, G. L.; Kirshenbaum, K.; Bonneau, R. A Rotamer Library to Enable Modeling and Design of Peptoid Foldamers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 8772−8782. (291) Nandel, F. S.; Jaswal, R. R.; Saini, A.; Nandel, V.; Shafique, M. Construction and conformational behavior of peptoids with cis-amide bond geometry: design of a peptoid with alternate φ, ψ values of inverse PP-II/PP-II and PP-I structures. J. Mol. Model. 2014, 20, 1−9. (292) Haxton, T. K.; Mannige, R. V.; Zuckermann, R. N.; Whitelam, S. Modeling Sequence-Specific Polymers Using Anisotropic CoarseGrained Sites Allows Quantitative Comparison with Experiment. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2015, 11, 303−315. (293) Wiggins, P. M. Hydrophobic hydration, hydrophobic forces and protein folding. Phys. A 1997, 238, 113−128. (294) Arai, M.; Kuwajima, K. Role of the molten globule state in protein folding. Adv. Protein Chem. 2000, 53, 209−282. (295) Hecht, M. H.; Das, A.; Go, A.; Bradley, L. H.; Wei, Y. De novo proteins from designed combinatorial libraries. Protein Sci. 2004, 13, 1711−1723. (296) Zarrine-Afsar, A.; Wallin, S.; Neculai, A. M.; Neudecker, P.; Howell, P. L.; Davidson, A. R.; Chan, H. S. Theoretical and experimental demonstration of the importance of specific nonnative interactions in protein folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105, 9999−10004. (297) Dill, K. A.; Ozkan, S. B.; Shell, M. S.; Weikl, T. R. The protein folding problem. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2008, 37, 289−316.

(298) Murnen, H. K.; Khokhlov, A. R.; Khalatur, P. G.; Segalman, R. A.; Zuckermann, R. N. Impact of Hydrophobic Sequence Patterning on the Coil-to-Globule Transition of Protein-like Polymers. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 5229−5236. (299) Khokhlov, A. R.; Khalatur, P. G. Conformation-Dependent Sequence Design (Engineering) of AB Copolymers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 82, 3456−3459. (300) Lee, B.-C.; Zuckermann, R. N.; Dill, K. A. Folding a Nonbiological Polymer into a Compact Multihelical Structure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10999−11009. (301) Lee, B.-C.; Chu, T. K.; Dill, K. A.; Zuckermann, R. N. Biomimetic nanostructures: Creating a high-affinity zinc-binding site in a folded nonbiological polymer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 8847− 8855. (302) Sanii, B.; Kudirka, R.; Cho, A.; Venkateswaran, N.; Olivier, G. K.; Olson, A. M.; Tran, H.; Harada, R. M.; Tan, L.; Zuckermann, R. N. Shaken, not stirred: Collapsing a peptoid monolayer to produce freefloating, stable nanosheets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 20808−20815. (303) Kudirka, R.; Tran, H.; Sanii, B.; Nam, K. T.; Choi, P. H.; Venkateswaran, N.; Chen, R.; Whitelam, S.; Zuckermann, R. N. Folding of a single-chain, information-rich polypeptoid sequence into a highly ordered nanosheet. Biopolymers 2011, 96, 586−595. (304) Robertson, E. J.; Olivier, G. K.; Qian, M.; Proulx, C.; Zuckermann, R. N.; Richmond, G. L. Assembly and molecular order of two-dimensional peptoid nanosheets through the oil−water interface. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014, 111, 13284−13289. (305) Sanii, B.; Haxton, T. K.; Olivier, G. K.; Cho, A.; Barton, B.; Proulx, C.; Whitelam, S.; Zuckermann, R. N. Structure-Determining Step in the Hierarchical Assembly of Peptoid Nanosheets. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 11674−11684. (306) Olivier, G. K.; Cho, A.; Sanii, B.; Connolly, M. D.; Tran, H.; Zuckermann, R. N. Antibody-Mimetic Peptoid Nanosheets for Molecular Recognition. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 9276−9286. (307) Murnen, H. K.; Rosales, A. M.; Jaworski, J. N.; Segalman, R. A.; Zuckermann, R. N. Hierarchical self-assembly of a biomimetic diblock copolypeptoid into homochiral superhelices. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 16112−16119. (308) Ueda, M.; Uesaka, A.; Kimura, S. Selective disruption of each part of Janus molecular assemblies by lateral diffusion of stimuliresponsive amphiphilic peptides. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 1601− 1604. (309) Uesaka, A.; Ueda, M.; Makino, A.; Imai, T.; Sugiyama, J.; Kimura, S. Morphology Control between Twisted Ribbon, Helical Ribbon, and Nanotube Self-Assemblies with His-Containing Helical Peptides in Response to pH Change. Langmuir 2014, 30, 1022−1028. (310) Elgersma, R. C.; Mulder, G. E.; Kruijtzer, J. A.; Posthuma, G.; Rijkers, D. T.; Liskamp, R. M. Transformation of the amyloidogenic peptide amylin(20−29) into its corresponding peptoid and retropeptoid: Access to both an amyloid inhibitor and template for selfassembled supramolecular tapes. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 1837−1842. (311) Hebert, M. L.; Shah, D. S.; Blake, P.; Turner, J. P.; Servoss, S. L. Tunable peptoid microspheres: effects of side chain chemistry and sequence. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 4459−4464. (312) Hebert, M. L.; Shah, D. S.; Blake, P.; Servoss, S. L.; Hebert, M.; Shah, D.; Servoss, S. Uniform and Robust Peptoid Microsphere Coatings. Coatings 2013, 3, 98−107. (313) Lee, C. U.; Smart, T. P.; Guo, L.; Epps, T. H.; Zhang, D. Synthesis and Characterization of Amphiphilic Cyclic Diblock Copolypeptoids from N-Heterocyclic Carbene-Mediated Zwitterionic Polymerization of N-Substituted N-carboxyanhydride. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 9574−9585. (314) Maurer, P. H.; Subrahmanyam, D.; Katchalski, E.; Blout, E. R. Antigenicity of Polypeptides (Poly Alpha Amino Acids). J. Immunol. 1959, 83, 193−197. (315) Whittall, N.; Moran, D. M.; Wheeler, A. W.; Cottam, G. P. Suppression of Murine IgE Responses with Amino Acid Polymer/ Allergen Conjugates I. Preparation of Poly-(N-Methylglycine)/Grass Pollen Extract Conjugates using 4-(Methylmercapto)phenyl-succini1799


Chemical Reviews

Review

midyl succinate as coupling reagent. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 1985, 76, 354−360. (316) Wheeler, A. W.; Henderson, D. C.; Garman, A. J.; Moran, D. M. Suppression of Murine IgE Responses with Amino Acid Polymer/ Allergen Conjugates II. Suppressive Activities in Adjuvant-Induced IgE Responses. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 1985, 76, 361−368. (317) Cook, R. M.; Henderson, D. C.; Wheeler, A. W.; Moran, D. M. Suppression of Murine IgE Responses with Amino Acid Polymer/ Allergen Conjugates III. Activity in vitro. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 1986, 80, 355−360. (318) Moran, D. M.; Wheeler, A. W.; Henderson, D. C.; Whittall, N. Suppression of Murine IgE Responses with Amino Acid Polymer/ Allergen Conjugates IV. Suppressive Activities in Established IgE Model Systems. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 1986, 81, 357−362. (319) Henderson, D. C.; Wheeler, A. W.; Moran, D. M. Suppression of Murine IgE Responses with Amino Acid Polymer/Allergen Conjugates V. By Intranasal Administration. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 1987, 82, 208−211. (320) Hara, E.; Makino, A.; Kurihara, K.; Yamamoto, F.; Ozeki, E.; Kimura, S. Pharmacokinetic change of nanoparticulate formulation “Lactosome” on multiple administrations. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2012, 14, 261−266. (321) Hara, E.; Ueda, M.; Kim, C. J.; Makino, A.; Hara, I.; Ozeki, E.; Kimura, S. Suppressive immune response of poly-(sarcosine) chains in peptide-nanosheets in contrast to polymeric micelles. J. Pept. Sci. 2014, 20, 570−577. (322) Hara, E.; Ueda, M.; Makino, A.; Hara, I.; Ozeki, E.; Kimura, S. Factors Influencing in Vivo Disposition of Polymeric Micelles on Multiple Administrations. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 873−877. (323) Kim, C. J.; Hara, E.; Shimizu, A.; Sugai, M.; Kimura, S. Activation of B1a Cells in Peritoneal Cavity by T Cell-Independent Antigen Expressed on Polymeric Micelle. J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 104, 1839−1847. (324) Fetsch, C.; Flecks, S.; Gieseler, D.; Marschelke, C.; Ulbricht, J.; van Pée, K.; Luxenhofer, R. Self-Assembly of Amphiphilic Block Copolypeptoids with C2-C5 Side Chains in Aqueous Solution. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2015, 216, 547−560. (325) Gordon, D. J.; Sciarretta, K. L.; Meredith, S. C. Inhibition of βAmyloid(40) Fibrillogenesis and Disassembly of β-Amyloid(40) Fibrils by Short β-Amyloid Congeners Containing N-Methyl Amino Acids at Alternate Residues. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 8237−8245. (326) Janecka, A.; Kruszynski, R.; Fichna, J.; Kosson, P.; Janecki, T. Enzymatic degradation studies of endomorphin-2 and its analogs containing N-methylated amino acids. Peptides 2006, 27, 131−135. (327) Dechantsreiter, M. A.; Planker, E.; Mathä, B.; Lohof, E.; Hölzemann, G.; Jonczyk, A.; Goodman, S. L.; Kessler, H. NMethylated cyclic RGD peptides as highly active and selective alpha(V)beta(3) integrin antagonists. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 3033−3040. (328) Miller, S. M.; Simon, R. J.; Ng, S.; Zuckermann, R. N.; Kerr, J. M.; Moos, W. H. Proteolytic studies of homologous peptide and Nsubstituted glycine peptoid oligomers. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1994, 4, 2657−2662. (329) Sarid, S.; Berger, A.; Katchalski, E. Proline iminopeptidase. J. Biol. Chem. 1959, 234, 1740−1746. (330) Sarid, S.; Berger, A.; Katchalski, E. Proline iminopeptidase II. Purification and comparison with iminodipeptidase (prolinase). J. Biol. Chem. 1962, 237, 2207−2212. (331) Kirschke, H.; Hanson, H. Untersuchungen ü ber den Kollagenabbau durch Rattenorgane. Hoppe-Seyler's Z. Physiol. Chem. 1969, 350, 1437−1448. (332) Neumann, H.; Sela, M. Proteolytic activity in egg white. Proc. Israel Chem. Soc. 1960, 9A, 103−104. (333) Starke-Reed, P. E.; Oliver, C. N. Protein oxidation and proteolysis during aging and oxidative stress. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1989, 275, 559−567. (334) Berlett, B. S.; Stadtman, E. R. Protein oxidation in aging, disease, and oxidative stress. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 20313−20316.

(335) Yu, S. S.; Koblin, R. L.; Zachman, A. L.; Perrien, D. S.; Hofmeister, L. H.; Giorgio, T. D.; Sung, H. J. Physiologically-Relevant Oxidative Degradation of Oligo(proline)-Crosslinked Polymeric Scaffolds. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12, 4357−4366. (336) McGary, C. W., Jr Degradation of poly (ethylene oxide). J. Polym. Sci. 1960, 46, 51−57. (337) Konradi, R.; Pidhatika, B.; Mühlebach, A.; Textor, M. Poly-2methyl-2-oxazoline: a peptide-like polymer for protein-repellent surfaces. Langmuir 2008, 24, 613−616. (338) Konradi, R.; Acikgoz, C.; Textor, M. Polyoxazolines for Nonfouling Surface Coatings - A Direct Comparison to the Gold Standard PEG. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2012, 33, 1663−1676. (339) Pidhatika, B.; Rodenstein, M.; Chen, Y.; Rakhmatullina, E.; Mühlebach, A.; Acikgöz, C.; Textor, M.; Konradi, R. Comparative Stability Studies of Poly(2-methyl-2-oxazoline) and Poly(ethylene glycol) Brush Coatings. Biointerphases 2012, 7, 1. (340) Chen, Y.; Pidhatika, B.; von Erlach, T.; Konradi, R.; Textor, M.; Hall, H.; Lühmann, T. Comparative assessment of the stability of nonfouling poly(2-methyl-2-oxazoline) and poly(ethylene glycol) surface films: An in vitro cell culture study. Biointerphases 2014, 9, 031003. (341) Ulbricht, J.; Jordan, R.; Luxenhofer, R. On the biodegradability of Polyethylene glycol, Polypeptoids and Poly(2-oxazoline)s. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 4848−4861. (342) Kidchob, T.; Kimura, S.; Imanishi, Y. Preparation, structure and release profile of polypeptide microcapsules. J. Controlled Release 1996, 40, 285−291. (343) Kidchob, T.; Kimura, S.; Imanishi, Y. pH-responsive release from polypeptide microcapsules. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1997, 63, 453− 458. (344) Kidchob, T.; Kimura, S.; Imanishi, Y. Thermoresponsive release from poly(Glu(OMe))-block-poly(Sar) microcapsules with surface-grafting of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide). J. Controlled Release 1998, 50, 205−214. (345) Kidchob, T.; Kimura, S.; Imanishi, Y. Amphiphilic poly(Ala)-bpoly(Sar) microspheres loaded with hydrophobic drug. J. Controlled Release 1998, 51, 241−248. (346) Kimura, S.; Kidchob, T.; Imanishi, Y. Controlled release from amphiphilic polymer aggregates. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2001, 12, 85−95. (347) Tanisaka, H.; Kizaka-Kondoh, S.; Makino, A.; Tanaka, S.; Hiraoka, M.; Kimura, S. Near-infrared fluorescent labeled peptosome for application to cancer imaging. Bioconjugate Chem. 2008, 19, 109− 117. (348) Makino, A.; Kizaka-Kondoh, S.; Yamahara, R.; Hara, I.; Kanzaki, T.; Ozeki, E.; Hiraoka, M.; Kimura, S. Near-infrared fluorescence tumor imaging using nanocarrier composed of poly(Llactic acid)-block-poly(sarcosine) amphiphilic polydepsipeptide. Biomaterials 2009, 30, 5156−5160. (349) Makino, A.; Hara, E.; Hara, I.; Yamahara, R.; Kurihara, K.; Ozeki, E.; Yamamoto, F.; Kimura, S. Control of in vivo blood clearance time of polymeric micelle by stereochemistry of amphiphilic polydepsipeptides. J. Controlled Release 2012, 161, 821−825. (350) Yamamoto, F.; Yamahara, R.; Makino, A.; Kurihara, K.; Tsukada, H.; Hara, E.; Hara, I.; Kizaka-Kondoh, S.; Ohkubo, Y.; Ozeki, E.; Kimura, S. Radiosynthesis and initial evaluation of 18F labeled nanocarrier composed of poly(L-lactic acid)-block-poly(sarcosine) amphiphilic polydepsipeptide. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2013, 40, 387−394. (351) Heller, P.; Birke, A.; Huesmann, D.; Weber, B.; Fischer, K.; Reske-Kunz, A.; Bros, M.; Barz, M. Introducing PeptoPlexes: Polylysine-block-Polysarcosine Based Polyplexes for Transfection of HEK 293T Cells. Macromol. Biosci. 2014, 14, 1380−1395. (352) Heller, P.; Weber, B.; Birke, A.; Barz, M. Synthesis and Sequential Deprotection of Triblock Copolypept(o)ides Using Orthogonal Protective Group Chemistry. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2015, 36, 38−44. (353) Heller, P.; Mohr, N.; Birke, A.; Weber, B.; Reske-Kunz, A.; Bros, M.; Barz, M. Directed Interactions of Block Copolypept(o)ides with Mannose-binding Receptors: PeptoMicelles Targeted to Cells of the Innate Immune System. Macromol. Biosci. 2015, 15, 63−73. 1800


Chemical Reviews

Review

(354) Holm, R.; Klinker, K.; Weber, B.; Barz, M. Synthesis of Amphiphilic Block Copolypept(o)ides by Bifunctional Initiators: Making PeptoMicelles Redox Sensitive. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2015, 36, 2083−2091, DOI: 10.1002/marc.201500402. (355) Park, M.; Jardetzky, T. S.; Barron, A. E. NMEGylation: A novel modification to enhance the bioavailability of therapeutic peptides. Biopolymers 2011, 96, 688−693. (356) Murphy, J. E.; Uno, T.; Hamer, J. D.; Cohen, F. E.; Dwarki, V.; Zuckermann, R. N. A combinatorial approach to the discovery of efficient cationic peptoid reagents for gene delivery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1998, 95, 1517−1522. (357) Huang, C.-Y.; Uno, T.; Murphy, J. E.; Lee, S.; Hamer, J. D.; Escobedo, J. A.; Cohen, F. E.; Radhakrishnan, R.; Dwarki, V.; Zuckermann, R. N. Lipitoids - novel cationic lipids for cellular delivery of plasmid DNA in vitro. Chem. Biol. 1998, 5, 345−354. (358) Lobo, B. A.; Vetro, J. A.; Suich, D. M.; Zuckermann, R. N.; Middaugh, C. R. Structure/function analysis of peptoid/lipitoid: DNA complexes. J. Pharm. Sci. 2003, 92, 1905−1918. (359) Akinc, A.; Zumbuehl, A.; Goldberg, M.; Leshchiner, E. S.; Busini, V.; Hossain, N.; Bacallado, S. A.; Nguyen, D. N.; Fuller, J.; Alvarez, R.; Borodovsky, A.; Borland, T.; Constien, R.; de Fougerolles, A.; Dorkin, J. R.; Narayanannair Jayaprakash, K.; Jayaraman, M.; John, M.; Koteliansky, V.; Manoharan, M.; Nechev, L.; Qin, J.; Racie, T.; Raitcheva, D.; Rajeev, K. G.; Sah, D. W.; Soutschek, J.; Toudjarska, I.; Vornlocher, H. P.; Zimmermann, T. S.; Langer, R.; Anderson, D. G. A combinatorial library of lipid-like materials for delivery of RNAi therapeutics. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 561−569. (360) Schiffmacher, A. T.; Keefer, C. L. Optimization of a lipitoidbased plasmid DNA transfection protocol for bovine trophectoderm CT-1 cells. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.: Anim. 2012, 48, 403−406. (361) Zuckermann, R. N.; Kodadek, T. Peptoids as potential therapeutics. Curr. Opin. Mol. Ther. 2009, 11, 299−307. (362) Fowler, S. A.; Blackwell, H. E. Structure−function relationships in peptoids: Recent advances toward deciphering the structural requirements for biological function. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 1508−1524. (363) Gibbons, J. A.; Hancock, A. A.; Vitt, C. R.; Knepper, S.; Buckner, S. A.; Brune, M. E.; Milicic, I.; Kerwin, J. F.; Richter, L. S.; Taylor, E. W.; et al. Pharmacologic characterization of CHIR 2279, an N-substituted glycine peptoid with high-affinity binding for alpha 1adrenoceptors. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1996, 277, 885−899. (364) Alluri, P.; Liu, B.; Yu, P.; Xiao, X.; Kodadek, T. Isolation and characterization of coactivator-binding peptoids from a combinatorial library. Mol. BioSyst. 2006, 2, 568−579. (365) Chongsiriwatana, N. P.; Patch, J. A.; Czyzewski, A. M.; Dohm, M. T.; Ivankin, A.; Gidalevitz, D.; Zuckermann, R. N.; Barron, A. E. Peptoids that mimic the structure, function, and mechanism of helical antimicrobial peptides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105, 2794− 2799. (366) Kapoor, R.; Eimerman, P. R.; Hardy, J. W.; Cirillo, J. D.; Contag, C. H.; Barron, A. E. Efficacy of Antimicrobial Peptoids against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 3058−3062. (367) Chongsiriwatana, N. P.; Miller, T. M.; Wetzler, M.; Vakulenko, S.; Karlsson, A. J.; Palecek, S. P.; Mobashery, S.; Barron, A. E. Short Alkylated Peptoid Mimics of Antimicrobial Lipopeptides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 417−420. (368) Seo, J.; Ren, G.; Liu, H.; Miao, Z.; Park, M.; Wang, Y.; Miller, T. M.; Barron, A. E.; Cheng, Z. In Vivo Biodistribution and Small Animal PET of 64Cu-Labeled Antimicrobial Peptoids. Bioconjugate Chem. 2012, 23, 1069−1079. (369) Mojsoska, B.; Jenssen, H. Peptides and Peptidomimetics for Antimicrobial Drug Design. Pharmaceuticals 2015, 8, 366−415. (370) Mojsoska, B.; Zuckermann, R. N.; Jenssen, H. StructureActivity Relationship Study of Novel Peptoids That Mimic the Structure of Antimicrobial Peptides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 4112−4120.

(371) Kwon, Y. U.; Kodadek, T. Quantitative evaluation of the relative cell permeability of peptoids and peptides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 1508−1509. (372) Stillwell, W.; Winter, H. C. The diffusion of glycine and Nsubstituted glycines across bimolecular lipid membranes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1973, 54, 1437−1443. (373) Malet, G.; Martín, G.; Orzáez, M.; Vicent, J.; Masip, I.; Sanclimens, G.; Ferrer-Montiel, A.; Mingarro, I.; Messeguer, A.; Fearnhead, O.; Pérez-Payá, E. Small molecule inhibitors of Apaf-1related caspase- 3/-9 activation that control mitochondrial-dependent apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2006, 13, 1523−1532. (374) Orzáez, M.; Mondragón, L.; Marzo, I.; Sanclimens, G.; Messeguer, A.; Pérez-Payá, E.; Vicent, M. J. Conjugation of a novel Apaf-1 inhibitor to peptide-based cell-membrane transporters: effective methods to improve inhibition of mitochondria-mediated apoptosis. Peptides 2007, 28, 958−968. (375) Vicent, M. J.; Pérez-Payá, E. Poly-L-glutamic acid (PGA) aided inhibitors of apoptotic protease activating factor 1 (Apaf-1): an antiapoptotic polymeric nanomedicine. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 3763− 3765. (376) Ucero, A. C.; Berzal, S.; Ocaña-Salceda, C.; Sancho, M.; Orzáez, M.; Messeguer, A.; Ruiz-Ortega, M.; Egido, J.; Vicent, M. J.; Ortiz, A.; Ramos, A. M. A polymeric nanomedicine diminishes inflammatory events in renal tubular cells. PLoS One 2013, 8, e51992. (377) Udugamasooriya, D. G.; Dineen, S. P.; Brekken, R. A.; Kodadek, T. A Peptoid “Antibody Surrogate” That Antagonizes VEGF Receptor 2 Activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 5744−5752. (378) Luo, Y.; Vali, S.; Sun, S.; Chen, X.; Liang, X.; Drozhzhina, T.; Popugaeva, E.; Bezprozvanny, I. Aβ42-Binding Peptoids as Amyloid Aggregation Inhibitors and Detection Ligands. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2013, 4, 952−962. (379) Brown, N. J.; Wu, C. W.; Seurynck-Servoss, S. L.; Barron, A. E. Effects of Hydrophobic Helix Length and Side Chain Chemistry on Biomimicry in Peptoid Analogues of SP-C. Biochemistry 2008, 47, 1808−1818. (380) Brown, N.; Dohm, M.; Bernardino de la Serna, J.; Barron, A. Biomimetic N-Terminal Alkylation of Peptoid Analogues of Surfactant Protein C. Biophys. J. 2011, 101, 1076−1085. (381) Rajasekhar, K.; Narayanaswamy, N.; Mishra, P.; Suresh, S. N.; Manjithaya, R.; Govindaraju, T. Synthesis of Hybrid Cyclic Peptoids and Identification of Autophagy Enhancer. ChemPlusChem 2014, 79, 25−30. (382) Lepage, M. L.; Meli, A.; Bodlenner, A.; Tarnus, C.; De Riccardis, F.; Izzo, I.; Compain, P. Synthesis of the first examples of iminosugar clusters based on cyclopeptoid cores. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2014, 10, 1406−1412. (383) Park, M.; Wetzler, M.; Jardetzky, T. S.; Barron, A. E. A readily applicable strategy to convert peptides to peptoid-based therapeutics. PLoS One 2013, 8, e58874. (384) Statz, A. R.; Meagher, R. J.; Barron, A. E.; Messersmith, P. B. New peptidomimetic polymers for antifouling surfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 7972−7973. (385) Statz, A. R.; Barron, A. E.; Messersmith, P. B. Protein, cell and bacterial fouling resistance of polypeptoid-modified surfaces: effect of side-chain chemistry. Soft Matter 2008, 4, 131−139. (386) Statz, A. R.; Kuang, J.; Ren, C.; Barron, A. E.; Szleifer, I.; Messersmith, P. B. Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Chain Length and Surface Coverage on Fouling of Surface Grafted Polypeptoids. Biointerphases 2009, 4, FA22−FA32. (387) Lau, K. H. A.; Ren, C.; Park, S. H.; Szleifer, I.; Messersmith, P. B. An Experimental-Theoretical Analysis of Protein Adsorption on Peptidomimetic Polymer Brushes. Langmuir 2012, 28, 2288−2298. (388) Lau, K. H. A.; Sileika, T. S.; Park, S. H.; Sousa, A. M.; Burch, P.; Szleifer, I.; Messersmith, P. B. Molecular Design of Antifouling Polymer Brushes Using Sequence-Specific Peptoids. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 2, 1−10. (389) Lau, K. H. A.; Ren, C.; Sileika, T. S.; Park, S. H.; Szleifer, I.; Messersmith, P. B. Surface-Grafted Polysarcosine as a Peptoid Antifouling Polymer Brush. Langmuir 2012, 28, 16099−16107. 1801


Chemical Reviews

Review

(390) Sun, J.; Stone, G. M.; Balsara, N. P.; Zuckermann, R. N. Structure−Conductivity Relationship for Peptoid-Based PEO−Mimetic Polymer Electrolytes. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 5151−5156. (391) Sun, J.; Teran, A. A.; Liao, X.; Balsara, N. P.; Zuckermann, R. N. Crystallization in Sequence-Defined Peptoid Diblock Copolymers Induced by Microphase Separation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 2070−2077. (392) Meldrum, F. C.; Cölfen, H. Controlling Mineral Morphologies and Structures in Biological and Synthetic Systems. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 4332−4432. (393) Reyes, F. T.; Guo, L.; Hedgepeth, J. W.; Zhang, D.; Kelland, M. A. First Investigation of the Kinetic Hydrate Inhibitor Performance of Poly(N-alkylglycine)s. Energy Fuels 2014, 28, 6889−6896. (394) Huang, M. L.; Ehre, D.; Jiang, Q.; Hu, C.; Kirshenbaum, K.; Ward, M. D. Biomimetic peptoid oligomers as dual-action antifreeze agents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109, 19922−19927. (395) Chen, C.-L.; Qi, J.; Zuckermann, R. N.; DeYoreo, J. J. Engineered Biomimetic Polymers as Tunable Agents for Controlling CaCO3 mineralization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 5214−5217. (396) Chen, C.-L.; Qi, J.; Tao, J.; Zuckermann, R. N.; DeYoreo, J. J. Tuning calcite morphology and growth acceleration by a rational design of highly stable protein-mimetics. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6266. (397) Reyes, F. T.; Kelland, M. A.; Kumar, N.; Jia, L. First Investigation of the Kinetic Hydrate Inhibition of a Series of Poly(βpeptoid)s on Structure II Gas Hydrate, Including the Comparison of Block and Random Copolymers. Energy Fuels 2015, 29, 695−701. (398) Malkin, T. L.; Murray, B. J.; Brukhno, A. V.; Anwar, J.; Salzmann, C. G. Structure of ice crystallized from supercooled water. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109, 1041−1045. (399) Graether, S. P.; Kuiper, M. J.; Gagné, S. M.; Walker, V. K.; Jia, Z.; Sykes, B. D.; Davies, P. L. β-Helix structure and ice-binding properties of a hyperactive antifreeze protein from an insect. Nature 2000, 406, 325−328. (400) Wu, H.; Liang, T.; Yin, C.; Jin, Y.; Ke, Y.; Liang, X. Enantiorecognition ability of peptoids with α-chiral, aromatic side chains. Analyst 2011, 136, 4409−4411. (401) Wu, H.; Song, G.; Liang, X.; Ke, Y. Investigation of Peptoid Chiral Stationary Phases Terminated with N′ -Substituted Phenyl- L -proline/leucine Amide. Chin. J. Chem. 2012, 30, 2791−2797. (402) Wu, H.; Su, X.; Li, K.; Yu, H.; Ke, Y.; Liang, X. Improvement of peptoid chiral stationary phases by modifying the terminal group of selector. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1265, 181−185. (403) Wu, H.; Li, K.; Yu, H.; Ke, Y.; Liang, X. Investigation of peptoid chiral stationary phases varied in absolute configuration. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1281, 155−159. (404) Wu, H.; Song, G.; Wang, D.; Yu, H.; Ke, Y.; Liang, X. Study of stereomeric peptoid chiral stationary phases containing different chiral side chains. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1298, 152−156. (405) Wu, H.; Wang, D.; Song, G.; Ke, Y.; Liang, X. Novel chiral stationary phases based on peptoid combining a quinine/quinidine moiety through a C9-position carbamate group. J. Sep. Sci. 2014, 37, 934−943. (406) Maayan, G.; Ward, M. D.; Kirshenbaum, K. Metallopeptoids. Chem. Commun. 2009, 2009, 56−58. (407) De Cola, C.; Fiorillo, G.; Meli, A.; Aime, S.; Gianolio, E.; Izzo, I.; De Riccardis, F. Gadolinium-binding cyclic hexapeptoids: synthesis and relaxometric properties. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014, 12, 424−431. (408) Kimura, S.; Ozeki, E.; Imanishi, Y. Ca2+ transport through lipid membrane by diastereomer cyclic octapeptides. Biopolymers 1989, 28, 1247−1257. (409) Nalband, D. M.; Warner, B. P.; Zahler, N. H.; Kirshenbaum, K. Rapid identification of metal-binding peptoid oligomers by on-resin Xray fluorescence screening. Biopolymers 2014, 102, 407−415. (410) Knight, A. S.; Zhou, E. Y.; Pelton, J. G.; Francis, M. B. Selective Chromium(VI) Ligands Identified Using Combinatorial Peptoid Libraries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 17488−17493.

1802


Peptoids and Polypeptoids at the Frontier of Supra - ACS Publications

Recommend Documents