3 A Review of Enzymatic Techniques Used
Downloaded by KTH ROYAL INST OF TECHNOLOGY on November 18, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1971 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1971-0104.ch003
for Pesticide Residue Analysis D. C.
VILLENEUVE
F o o d and D r u g Directorate, Department of National Health and Welfare, Ottawa, Canada
A review
is presented
for pesticide
residue
on the use of enzymatic analysis.
-carboxylesterase procedures, of such theory their
techniques, behind
limits
vantages.
their
are use,
of detection, Other
enzymatic
techniques
Anticholinesterase which
described the
comprise with
different
and their
and the
reference methods
advantages
techniques
to
the
of
assay,
and
disad-
are also
*~r*he f a c t t h a t m a n y pesticides i n h i b i t e n z y m e s in vitro A
anti-
majority
discussed.
has l e d to t h e
i n t r o d u c t i o n of v a r i o u s a n a l y t i c a l m e t h o d s for the d e t e c t i o n a n d esti-
m a t i o n of p e s t i c i d e residues. T h i s p a p e r w i l l not d e s c r i b e i n d e t a i l a l l the e n z y m a t i c t e c h n i q u e s u s e d for p e s t i c i d e r e s i d u e analysis b u t r a t h e r w i l l a t t e m p t to c a t e g o r i z e a n d d e s c r i b e b r i e f l y the m a i n types w i t h r e f e r ence to t h e t h e o r y b e h i n d t h e i r use, t h e i r p r a c t i c a l a p p l i c a t i o n , a n d associated problems.
T h i s w i l l b e f o l l o w e d b y a b r i e f d i s c u s s i o n o n the
advantages a n d d i s a d v a n t a g e s of these t e c h n i q u e s .
Cholinesterase Techniques Theory. C h o l i n e s t e r a s e i n h i b i t i o n b y o r g a n o p h o s p h o r u s i n s e c t i c i d e s has b e e n the subject of s e v e r a l excellent r e v i e w s b y O ' B r i e n ( J , 2)
and
H e a t h ( 3 ) . T h e basis of toxic a c t i o n of o r g a n o p h o s p h a t e s a n d c a r b a m a t e s i n m a m m a l s is g e n e r a l l y associated w i t h t h e i r a b i l i t y to i n h i b i t c h o l i n esterase i n the c e n t r a l a n d p e r i p h e r a l n e r v o u s systems w h e r e i t p l a y s a n i m p o r t a n t r o l e i n the t r a n s m i s s i o n of n e r v e i m p u l s e s . O r g a n o p h o s p h a t e s a n d c a r b a m a t e s react w i t h cholinesterase i n a m a n n e r s i m i l a r to the r e a c t i o n of cholinesterase w i t h a c e t y l c h o l i n e a n d c a n b e d e p i c t e d as f o l l o w s : 27
In Pesticides Identification; Biros, F.; Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1971.
28
PESTICIDES
H 0 E O H + A X +± E O H . A X -> E O A - * E O H + \ X - + H+
IDENTIFICATION
2
w h e r e E O H represents cholinesterase
A" +
H+
(1)
( O H b e i n g a serine O H i n the
a c t i v e s i t e ) , A X is e i t h e r a c e t y l c h o l i n e o r a n o r g a n o p h o s p h a t e
or carba-
Downloaded by KTH ROYAL INST OF TECHNOLOGY on November 18, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1971 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1971-0104.ch003
m a t e i n s e c t i c i d e , a n d X is the l e a v i n g g r o u p — i . e . , c h o l i n e i n a c e t y l c h o l i n e , p-nitrophenol i n paraoxon, or 1-naphthol i n c a r b a r y l ( 2 ) .
The symbol A
c a n designate e i t h e r the a c e t y l g r o u p , a d i a l k y l p h o s p h o r y l g r o u p , or a m e t h y l c a r b a m y l g r o u p . T h u s , the r e a c t i o n i n v o l v e s a c o m p l e x f o r m a t i o n f o l l o w e d b y p h o s p h o r y l a t i o n , a c e t y l a t i o n , o r c a r b a m y l a t i o n of the e n z y m e , a n d finally h y d r o l y s i s . I f the c o n c e n t r a t i o n of i n h i b i t o r is r e l a t i v e l y l a r g e (10~ o r 10" M ) as c o m p a r e d w i t h the c o n c e n t r a t i o n of substrate ( 1 0 " 5
6
10
M ) , the o v e r - a l l r e a c t i o n c a n b e c o n s i d e r e d a first-order b i m o l e c u l a r t y p e a n d c a n b e d e s c r i b e d i n terms of the f o l l o w i n g e q u a t i o n : log P = 2 -
g
(2)
t
w h e r e P is the p e r c e n t a c t i v i t y of the e n z y m e r e m a i n i n g after i n c u b a t i o n of I c o n c e n t r a t i o n o f i n h i b i t o r for t i m e t, a n d k is t h e b i m o l e c u l a r rate {
constant.
T h u s , f o r a n y v a l u e of t there is a c o n c e n t r a t i o n of i n h i b i t o r
w h i c h w o u l d r e d u c e P , the p e r c e n t a c t i v i t y , to 5 0 % . T h i s v a l u e is k n o w n as t h e ho, a n d because its v a l u e is often s m a l l , the n e g a t i v e l o g a r i t h m of the 7 , the p 7 , is u s e d . T a b l e I gives the J 50
5 0
5
0
a n d ph
of s e v e r a l o r g a n o -
0
phosphorus a n d carbamate insecticides, using h u m a n plasma cholinesterase as e n z y m e source. Table I. Cholinesterase-Inhibitive Effects of Several Organophosphate and Carbamate Insecticides 0
Quantity to Produce 50% Inhibition " 1
Mol.
Insecticide Coroxon DDVP DFP Guthoxon Parathion Paraoxon Ruelene Phosphamidon Carbaryl c
d
a 6 c d
Wt.
346.5 221.0 184.2 301.0 291.0 275.0 291.5 299.5 201.0
Molar 3.16 6.30 5.01 6.31 2.43 1.88 5.62 6.7 1.2
I
Concn.,
X 10X lO" X 10X 10X lO" X 10X lO" X 10X 10-'
7
6
8 6
6
8
4
7
Data taken from Giang and Hall (4), O'Brien (5), and Voss (6). Human plasma cholinesterase used as enzyme source. Oxygen analog of Co-Ral. Oxygen analog of Guthion.
In Pesticides Identification; Biros, F.; Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1971.
pi 7.50 6.80 8.70 5.80 5.39 8.27 4.75 7.83 5.08
3.
F r o m the Z if
Enzymatic
V I L L E N E U V E
first-order
5 0
Techniques
for
Analysis
a n d t, one c a n c a l c u l a t e , u s i n g E q u a t i o n 2 , t h e ki v a l u e
k i n e t i c s are f o l l o w e d .
Main
( 7 ) has d e v e l o p e d
a kinetic
t r e a t m e n t t h a t d e t e r m i n e s b o t h the affinity of the i n h i b i t o r for the e n z y m e a n d the a b i l i t y to p h o s p h o r y l a t e the e n z y m e o n c e b i n d i n g has o c c u r r e d . W i t h this treatment, the ki f r o m E q u a t i o n 2 c a n n o t b e c o n s i d e r e d as a s i m p l e b i m o l e c u l a r rate constant b u t as a c o m b i n a t i o n of a u n i m o l e c u l a r Downloaded by KTH ROYAL INST OF TECHNOLOGY on November 18, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1971 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1971-0104.ch003
rate constant a n d a n affinity constant. H o w e v e r , the m e a s u r e m e n t of the ki as o u t l i n e d i n E q u a t i o n 2 does p r o v i d e a satisfactory m e a s u r e of the i n h i b i t o r y p o t e n c y i n m o s t cases. Methods of Assessing Cholinesterase Inhibition. T h e i n c r e a s e d use of c h o l i n e s t e r a s e - i n h i b i t i n g i n s e c t i c i d e s has s t i m u l a t e d r e s e a r c h i n m a n y areas of scientific endeavor. in vivo
O n e s u c h a r e a has b e e n c o n c e r n e d w i t h the
t o x i c o l o g i c a l p r o p e r t i e s o f cholinesterase i n h i b i t o r s .
However,
t h e area of c o n c e r n h e r e is i n the field of a n a l y t i c a l c h e m i s t r y , w h e r e cholinesterases are u s e d as a t o o l for the q u a n t i t a t i v e d e t e r m i n a t i o n of u n k n o w n amounts of i n h i b i t o r s ( 8 ) .
S u c h p r o c e d u r e s are f r e q u e n t l y u s e d
for the analysis of c e r t a i n p e s t i c i d e residues a n d c a n be c a t e g o r i z e d i n t o the f o l l o w i n g types of m e t h o d s : P O T E N T I O M E T R I C
O R A P H
O n e s u c h m e t h o d , p r o b a b l y the
M E T H O D S .
first ever u s e d , w a s the one p u b l i s h e d b y G i a n g a n d H a l l (4)
for the
d e t e r m i n a t i o n of t e t r a e t h y l p y r o p h o s p h a t e ( T E P P ) a n d p a r a t h i o n i n p l a n t m a t e r i a l . O n e p r o b l e m was t h a t p a r a t h i o n w a s a w e a k i n h i b i t o r in vitro a n d r e q u i r e d c o n v e r s i o n to its o x y g e n a n a l o g to o b t a i n sufficient sensitivity.
T h i s w a s a c c o m p l i s h e d b y t r e a t i n g p a r a t h i o n w i t h a m i x t u r e of
c o n c e n t r a t e d a n d f u m i n g n i t r i c acids. It r e q u i r e d 4 2 . 5
o f p a r a t h i o n to
p r o d u c e 5 0 % i n h i b i t i o n , as c o m p a r e d w i t h 0 . 0 3 1 fig for p a r a o x o n .
The
m e t h o d consisted of e x t r a c t i n g the p e s t i c i d e f r o m the p l a n t , i n c u b a t i n g a n a l i q u o t of the e x t r a c t e d p e s t i c i d e w i t h a s t a n d a r d b o v i n e cholinesterase s o l u t i o n , d e t e r m i n i n g the r e m a i n i n g cholinesterase a c t i v i t y after i n c u b a t i o n , a n d c o m p a r i n g the p e r c e n t i n h i b i t i o n w i t h a s t a n d a r d c u r v e i n o r d e r to o b t a i n the q u a n t i t y of m a t e r i a l . C h o l i n e s t e r a s e a c t i v i t y w a s m e a s u r e d u s i n g a c e t y l c h o l i n e b r o m i d e as substrate a n d m e a s u r i n g t h e c h a n g e i n p H c a u s e d b y the release of a c e t i c a c i d .
T h e " p e r c e n t i n h i b i t i o n " ( 9 ) is
c a l c u l a t e d as f o l l o w s : A p H = p H (initial) % Inhibition = T I T R I M E T R I C
M E T H O D S .
1 —
p H (final)
A p H (sample) X A p H (control)
100
T h e s e m e t h o d s i n v o l v e the t i t r a t i o n of a c e t i c
a c i d l i b e r a t e d b y the h y d r o l y s i s of a c e t y l c h o l i n e , w h i c h is n o r m a l l y acc o m p l i s h e d w i t h a " p H - s t a t " so t h a t a constant p H is m a i n t a i n e d . T h e advantages of these m e t h o d s o v e r the A p H m e t h o d s are t h a t the m e a s u r e d
In Pesticides Identification; Biros, F.; Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1971.
30
PESTICIDES
IDENTIFICATION
a c t i v i t y is not d i r e c t l y i n f l u e n c e d b y the buffer s t r e n g t h of the s o l u t i o n a n d that a constant p H is m a i n t a i n e d d u r i n g the e n z y m e r e a c t i o n .
(10)
T h i s t y p e of m e t h o d has b e e n u s e d d i r e c t l y for the d e t e r m i n a t i o n of p a r a t h i o n w h i l e other w o r k e r s u s e d a m i c r o t i t r i m e t r i c m e t h o d
to
obtain
greater s e n s i t i v i t y ( I I ) .
Downloaded by KTH ROYAL INST OF TECHNOLOGY on November 18, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1971 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1971-0104.ch003
M A N O M E T R I C
M E T H O D S .
T h e s e m e t h o d s i n v o l v e the m e a s u r e m e n t of
c a r b o n d i o x i d e l i b e r a t e d f r o m the a c t i o n of the released acetic a c i d o n sodium bicarbonate.
D u B o i s a n d C o t t e r (in Ref. 10)
u s e d this t y p e of
m e t h o d to d e t e r m i n e D i p t e r e x i n m i l k . C O L O R I M E T R I C
M E T H O D S .
Measurement
of Unchanged
Acetylcholine.
T h i s c o l o r i m e t r i c t e c h n i q u e d e p e n d s o n m e a s u r i n g the u n c h a n g e d a c e t y l c h o l i n e w i t h h y d r o x y l a m i n e to p r o d u c e a c e t o h y d r o x a m i c a c i d w h i c h y i e l d s a p u r p l e color w i t h excess f e r r i c c h l o r i d e after a c i d i f i c a t i o n . C o o k o r i g i n a l l y a p p l i e d this m e t h o d to p e s t i c i d e r e s i d u e analysis o n
(12) paper
chromatograms. Indophenyl
A c o l o r i m e t r i c m e t h o d for the analysis of c h o -
Acetate.
l i n e s t e r a s e - i n h i b i t i n g insecticides u s i n g i n d o p h e n y l acetate as substrate was p u b l i s h e d b y A r c h e r a n d Z w e i g i n 1959 (13).
T h e procedure was
b a s e d o n the m e a s u r e m e n t of the h y d r o l y s i s p r o d u c t of i n d o p h e n y l acetate at 625 fx at a p H of 8.0.
T h r e e different e n z y m a t i c m e t h o d s , a p o -
t e n t i o m e t r i c , a p a p e r c h r o m a t o g r a p h i c , a n d the c o l o r i m e t r i c one tioned, were compared peaches.
G o o d agreement w a s s h o w n b y a l l three m e t h o d s .
H a n k e n s o n (17)
men-
b y d e t e r m i n i n g r e s i d u e levels of c a r b a r y l o n Beam and
u s e d the same m e t h o d to d e t e r m i n e k n o w n a m o u n t s of
Sevin, Trithion, parathion, malathion, G u t h i o n , Dipterex, and ronnel i n milk.
S e n s i t i v i t y r a n g e d f r o m 0.008 to 0.2 p p m .
Phenol
Red.
T h e first p u b l i c a t i o n s of a n a u t o m a t e d p r o c e d u r e
the m e a s u r e m e n t of cholinesterase i n h i b i t o r s are those of W i n t e r and Winter and Ferrari (15).
for (14)
T h e method employed an Autoanalyzer
i n s t r u m e n t a l system w h e r e i n the extracts c o n t a i n i n g the i n s e c t i c i d e w e r e i n c u b a t e d w i t h a s t a n d a r d cholinesterase s o l u t i o n at 37 ° C . A c o n t i n u o u s s a m p l e f r o m the i n c u b a t i o n b a t h is b u f f e r e d a n d m i x e d w i t h a c e t y l c h o l i n e i o d i d e . A f t e r a s e c o n d i n c u b a t i o n , the acetic a c i d released b y the a c t i o n of
the u n i n h i b i t e d cholinesterase
is m e a s u r e d
colorimetrically, using
p h e n o l r e d as the i n d i c a t o r . M o r e r e c e n t l y , F i s c h l et al. (16)
reported a
m e t h o d for r a p i d d e t e c t i o n of o r g a n i c p h o s p h a t e pesticides i n s e r u m . Strips of
filter
paper were impregnated w i t h a buffered
acetylcholine
substrate s o l u t i o n c o n t a i n i n g p h e n o l r e d as a n i n d i c a t o r . W h e n n o i n h i b i t i o n is present, the a c i d released f r o m the a c t i o n of turns the p a p e r y e l l o w .
cholinesterase
W h e n cholinesterase has b e e n i n h i b i t e d , the
p a p e r turns p i n k - t o - v i o l e t .
In Pesticides Identification; Biros, F.; Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1971.
3.
Enzymatic
V I L L E N E U V E
Acetylthiocholine
Techniques
for
31
Analysis
A n o t h e r a u t o m a t e d p r o c e d u r e for c h o l i n -
Iodide.
esterase i n h i b i t i o n studies has b e e n u s e d b y L e v i n e et al. (18) V o s s (19).
and by
T h e m e t h o d uses a c e t y l t h i o c h o l i n e i o d i d e as substrate a n d
d i t h i o b i s n i t r o b e n z o i c a c i d ( D T N B ) . C h o l i n e s t e r a s e splits the substrate, a n d the t h i o c h o l i n e r e l e a s e d reduces the D T N B to the y e l l o w a n i o n of
Downloaded by KTH ROYAL INST OF TECHNOLOGY on November 18, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1971 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1971-0104.ch003
t h i o n i t r o b e n z o i c a c i d , w h o s e a b s o r b a n c e is m e a s u r e d at 4 2 0 /*. Fluorogenic
Substrates.
method using a
fluorometric
G u i l b a u l t a n d K r a m e r (20)
published a
assay f o r a n t i c h o l i n e s t e r a s e c o m p o u n d s .
substrates u s e d w e r e nonfluorescent
compounds,
The
the a c e t y l a n d b u t y l
esters of 1 - a n d 2 - n a p h t h o l , w h i c h are h y d r o l y z e d b y cholinesterase to highly
fluorescent
m a t e r i a l s . T h e rate of c h a n g e
of
fluorescence
r e l a t e d to e n z y m e a c t i v i t y , a n d i n h i b i t i o n w a s m e a s u r e d b y rate of c h a n g e i n the p r o d u c t i o n of
was
decreased
fluorescence.
A s e m i q u a n t i t a t i v e test for the i d e n t i f i c a t i o n of c h o l i n e s t e r a s e - i n h i b i t i n g pesticides has b e e n d e s c r i b e d b y S c h u l t z m a n n a n d B a r t h e l
(21).
I n d o x y l acetate was u s e d as the substrate, i n c o n j u c t i o n w i t h a t w o - d i m e n s i o n a l t h i n - l a y e r c h r o m a t o g r a p h i c t e c h n i q u e . I t c o n s i s t e d of s p o t t i n g t h e c l e a n e d - u p samples o n a s i l i c a g e l t h i n - l a y e r p l a t e , d e v e l o p i n g t h e p l a t e i n the a p p r o p r i a t e solvent systems, a n d s p r a y i n g the p l a t e w i t h a horse s e r u m cholinesterase s o l u t i o n a n d i n d o x y l acetate. T h e c h o l i n e s t e r a s e - i n h i b i t i n g c o m p o u n d s a p p e a r e d as w h i t e spots o n a b l u e b a c k g r o u n d , a n d s e n s i t i v i t y w a s i n the s u b m i c r o g r a m r a n g e . A G A R - A G A R
D I F F U S I O N
T E C H N I Q U E S .
B e n y o n a n d S t o y d i n (22)
de-
s c r i b e d a p r o c e d u r e i n w h i c h a l a y e r of a g a r - a g a r 5 m m t h i c k c o n t a i n i n g cholinesterase a n d b r o m t h y m o l b l u e at a p H of 7 . 8 - 7 . 9 was u s e d .
A
2 - p r o p a n o l s o l u t i o n ( 0 . 1 m l ) of the i n s e c t i c i d e w a s a p p l i e d to a h o l e i n t h e agar a n d w a s a l l o w e d to diffuse for 1 8 h o u r s at r o o m t e m p e r a t u r e . T h e plate was then sprayed w i t h acetylcholine chloride solution, a n d the b l u e l a y e r t u r n e d y e l l o w w i t h i n 3 0 m i n u t e s except i n those w h e r e the e n z y m e w a s i n h i b i t e d , w h i c h r e m a i n e d as b l u e circles.
areas The
d i a m e t e r of these circles was p r o p o r t i o n a l to t h e a m o u n t of the i n h i b i t o r . A s little as 3 n g o f p a r a t h i o n c o u l d b e d e t e c t e d b y this t e c h n i q u e . F L U O R E S C E N T
25)
E Q U I L I B R I U M
PROBES.
have synthesized active-site-directed
H i m e l a n d co-workers fluorescent
(23,
24,
e q u i l i b r i u m probes
w h i c h are c o m p e t i t i v e i n h i b i t o r s of the a c t i v e site of cholinesterase e n zymes.
The
fluorescence
i n t e n s i t y of the p r o b e - e n z y m e
c o m p l e x is d e -
creased b y a n y f o r e i g n m o l e c u l e ( i n s e c t i c i d e ) w h i c h c o m p e t e s w i t h t h e equilibrium
fluorescent
p r o b e for the a c t i v e site of t h e e n z y m e or w h i c h
changes the e q u i l i b r i u m d y n a m i c s b y exo a r e a r e a c t i o n w i t h t h e e n z y m e . T h i s h i g h l y specific a n d sensitive s p e c t r o s c o p i c m e t h o d is b e i n g d e v e l o p e d as a n a n a l y t i c a l m e t h o d for i n s e c t i c i d e s
(26).
In Pesticides Identification; Biros, F.; Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1971.
32
PESTICIDES
IDENTIFICATION
Carboxylesterase Inhibition I n the R e p o r t of the C o m m i s s i o n o n E n z y m e s ( 2 7 ) ,
Theory.
car-
boxylesterases are i n c l u d e d i n the g e n e r a l g r o u p " H y d r o l a s e s " ( E . C . 3 . ) and
more
specifically
in
the
category
carboxylic
ester
hydrolases
( E . C . 3 . 1 . 1 . 1 . ) . T h e s e e n z y m e s are r e s p o n s i b l e for c a t a l y z i n g the g e n e r a l Downloaded by KTH ROYAL INST OF TECHNOLOGY on November 18, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1971 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1971-0104.ch003
r e a c t i o n , c a r b o x y l i c ester +
H 0 ^± a l c o h o l + 2
carboxylic acid.
These
e n z y m e s h a v e b e e n f o u n d i n tissues of m a n y species of insects, a n i m a l s , a n d plants ( 2 8 , 2 9 , 3 0 , 3 1 , 3 2 , 3 3 , 3 4 , 3 5 , 3 6 ) .
H o w e v e r , the distinction be-
t w e e n esterases a n d other h y d r o l y t i c e n z y m e s has b e c o m e less c l e a r i n the l i g h t of e v i d e n c e t h a t c e r t a i n p r o t e o l y t i c e n z y m e s
(trypsin, chymo-
t r y p s i n , t h r o m b i n ) c a n h y d r o l y z e c a r b o x y l esters a n d are i n h i b i t e d b y substances k n o w n to b e p o t e n t esterase i n h i b i t o r s (37,38).
A s w i t h cho-
linesterases, i n h i b i t i o n i n v o l v e s the r e a c t i o n of the p h o s p h a t e w i t h the e n z y m e to f o r m a n a c y l d e r i v a t i v e ( p h o s p h o r y l a t e d e n z y m e ) .
T h e phos-
p h o r y l a t e d e n z y m e is q u i t e stable a n d prevents the a c t i o n of the esterase o n other substrates. T h e p h o s p h o r y l a t i o n of t h e e n z y m e is the r a t e - l i m i t i n g step a n d d e p e n d s u p o n the " f i t " of the c o m p o u n d o n t h e e n z y m e a n d t h e a b i l i t y of the c o m p o u n d to p h o s p h o r y l a t e a serine or h i s t i d i n e at the enzyme's a c t i v e site. T h e d e t a i l e d m e c h a n i s m of t h e i r i n h i b i t i o n b y o r g a n o p h o s p h o r u s p e s t i c i d e s has b e e n d i s c u s s e d b y s e v e r a l w o r k e r s a n d p r o c e d u r e s h a v e b e e n w o r k e d o u t for d e t e r m i n i n g r a t e constants of this step (7, 39, 40,41). constant (ki)
It has b e e n suggested ( 7 ) t h a t the b i m o l e c u l a r rate
is the m o s t r e l i a b l e c r i t e r i o n to m e a s u r e the i n h i b i t o r y
p o w e r of a n o r g a n o p h o s p h a t e f o r a n esterase. H o w e v e r , c r i t e r i a s u c h as p e r c e n t i n h i b i t i o n a n d I values are c o n s i d e r e d to b e loosely d e f i n e d f u n c tions of the ki a n d m a y b e u s e d . Techniques. I n 1962, M c K i n l e y a n d R e a d (42)
d e v e l o p e d a n ester-
a s e - i n h i b i t i o n t e c h n i q u e for the d e t e c t i o n of o r g a n o p h o s p h a t e residues o n p a p e r c h r o m a t o g r a m s .
pesticide
T h e procedure involved conversion
of the t h i o p h o s p h a t e s w i t h b r o m i n e to y i e l d a c t i v e esterase i n h i b i t o r s , the i n h i b i t i o n b y the p e s t i c i d e of t h e esterases f r o m a b e e f l i v e r h o m o g e n a t e s p r a y e d o n t o the c h r o m a t o g r a m , the h y d r o l y s i s of t h e substrate ( a - n a p h t h y l acetate) w h i c h was s p r a y e d o n t o the p a p e r after the l i v e r
homo-
genate h a d d r i e d , a n d t h e d e v e l o p m e n t of a b a c k g r o u n d c o l o r b e t w e e n F a s t B l u e R R a n d the h y d r o l y s i s p r o d u c t , a - n a p h t h o l . T h i s t e c h n i q u e w a s a d a p t e d to t h i n l a y e r c h r o m a t o g r a p h y b y A c k e r m a n n (43).
T h e substrates u s e d w e r e 1-naphthylacetate, 2 - a z o b e n z e n e - l -
naphthylacetate, a n d indoxylacetate. r a n g e . A l a t e r s t u d y (44)
S e n s i t i v i t y w a s i n the n a n o g r a m
w a s c a r r i e d o u t u s i n g different a c t i v a t i o n t e c h -
n i q u e s i n a n a t t e m p t to m a k e the p r o c e d u r e m o r e sensitive. et al. (45)
Mendoza
u s e d i n d o x y l a n d s u b s t i t u t e d i n d o x y l a n d n a p h t h y l acetates
as substrates.
Indigo compounds
p r o d u c e d b y t h e h y d r o l y s i s of these
In Pesticides Identification; Biros, F.; Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1971.
3.
Enzymatic
V I L L E N E U V E
Techniques
for
33
Analysis
substrates gave c o l o r e d b a c k g r o u n d s , l e a v i n g the sites of i n h i b i t i o n b y p e s t i c i d e s as w h i t e spots; the colors p r o d u c e d w e r e b l u e f o r i n d o x y l a n d 5 - b r o m o i n d o x y l acetates, t u r q u o i s e for 5 - b r o m o - 4 - c h l o r o i n d o x y l and
p i n k for 5 - b r o m o - 6 - c h l o r o i n d o x y l
acetate.
S e n s i t i v i t y of
acetate, detection
w a s i n the n a n o g r a m r a n g e , a n d t h e b a c k g r o u n d a n d spots w e r e stable for months.
Wales a n d co-workers
(46)
r e p o r t e d a p r o c e d u r e for t h e
Downloaded by KTH ROYAL INST OF TECHNOLOGY on November 18, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1971 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1971-0104.ch003
s e m i q u a n t i t a t i v e d e t e r m i n a t i o n of some o r g a n o p h o s p h o r u s p e s t i c i d e r e s i dues i n p l a n t extracts u s i n g M e n d o z a s p r o c e d u r e (44).
Ackermann
(46)
e x p e r i m e n t e d w i t h different a c t i v a t i o n t e c h n i q u e s to m a k e his t h i n - l a y e r t e c h n i q u e m o r e sensitive. O t h e r w o r k e r s (47)
have developed a method
to estimate p a r a t h i o n , m a l a t h i o n , a n d d i a z i n o n i n lettuce u s i n g a c a r b o x y l e s t e r a s e - i n h i b i t i o n assay. T h e m e t h o d i n v o l v e d a n e x t r a c t i o n p r o c e d u r e , followed b y sweep codistillation and thin layer chromatography.
The
pesticides w e r e s c r a p e d off the t h i n l a y e r p l a t e a n d u s e d i n a c a r b o x y l esterase assay u s i n g o - n i t r o p h e n y l p r o p i o n a t e as substrate. S e n s i t i v i t y r a n g e d f r o m 1.0 p p m for p a r a t h i o n to 8.0 p p m for m a l a t h i o n a n d 0.75 p p m for d i a z i n o n .
Other Techniques DDT
i n h i b i t s c a r b o n i c a n h y d r a s e a n d has b e e n m a d e the basis of a
q u a n t i t a t i v e m e t h o d w h i c h c a n d e t e r m i n e as l i t t l e as 0.2 pg of D D T M o r e r e c e n t l y , G u i l b a u l t et al. (20)
(11).
p u b l i s h e d a m e t h o d f o r the d e t e r -
m i n a t i o n of m e t h y l p a r a t h i o n , a l d r i n , a n d h e p t a c h l o r b a s e d o n the i n h i b i t i o n of a c i d a n d a l k a l i n e phosphatases b y these substances. T h e substrate w a s u m b e l l i f e r o n e p h o s p h a t e w h i c h w a s c l e a v e d b y the phosphatases to the
fluorescent
compound
umbelliferone.
Decreased
fluorescence
was
u s e d as a d i r e c t m e a s u r e of the i n h i b i t o r , a n d the s e n s i t i v i t y w a s 5 p p m f o r m e t h y l p a r a t h i o n a n d a l d r i n a n d 50 p p m f o r h e p t a c h l o r . G e i k e
(48)
r e p o r t e d t h a t some o r g a n o c h l o r i n e insecticides w i l l i n h i b i t b o v i n e esterase after exposure to U V i r r a d i a t i o n . l i v e r esterase in
O r d i n a r i l y , these c o m p o u n d s
activate
vitro.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Enzyme Techniques for Residue Analysis T h e m e t h o d s r e f e r r e d to p r e v i o u s l y are s u m m a r i z e d i n T a b l e I I , a l o n g w i t h t h e i r r e p o r t e d l i m i t s of s e n s i t i v i t y a n d details o n t h e i r a p p l i c a t i o n to r e s i d u e analysis. T h e most o b v i o u s s h o r t c o m i n g of these m e t h o d s is t h a t v e r y f e w h a v e b e e n a p p l i e d to r e s i d u e analyses i n crops or foods. A m a j o r p r o b l e m i n the a p p l i c a t i o n of these m e t h o d s to r e s i d u e analysis is s a m p l e e x t r a c t i o n and
cleanup.
I t is w e l l k n o w n (8, 49, 51)
t h a t constituents of c e r t a i n
In Pesticides Identification; Biros, F.; Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1971.
34
PESTICIDES
Table II. Method of
Assay
Downloaded by KTH ROYAL INST OF TECHNOLOGY on November 18, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1971 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1971-0104.ch003
Potentiometric
Summary of the Different Methods
Ref. (4)
IDENTIFICATION
Pesticides
Used
Parathion, T E P P , Paraoxon
Titrimetric
(50)
Parathion
Manometric
(52)
Dipterex
Colorimetric
(12) (13) (17)
Systox Trithion, Sevin, Guthion, Thimet Sevin, Trithion, parathion, malathion, G u t h i o n , ronnel Thimet, parathion, diazinon, malathion Monocrotophos C - 8 3 5 3 (carbamate)
(15) (53) (6) Fluorogenic
(20) (54) (55) (36)
(8) Carboxylesterase
Systox, parathion D F P , methyl parathion, parathion, dimethyl chlorthiophosphate, diethyl chlorphosphate M e t h y l parathion, aldrin, heptachlor 29 O r g a n o p h o s p h o r u s a n d c a r b a m a t e i n s e c t i cides Birlane, dichlorvos mevinphos
(42)
22 O r g a n o p h o s p h a t e insecticides
(56)
32 O r g a n o p h o s p h o r u s a n d c a r b a m a t e i n s e c t i cides 8 Organophosphorus and carbamate insecticides 10 O r g a n o p h o s p h o r u s insecticides a n d S e v i n 7 O r g a n o p h o s p h o r u s insecticides Parathion, malathion and diazinon
(43) (44) (45) (47)
plants—i.e., tea, potatoes, t o b a c c o — r e q u i r e
f u r t h e r c l e a n u p b e c a u s e of
e n z y m e - i n h i b i t i n g i m p u r i t i e s . M a n y different p r o c e d u r e s h a v e b e e n u s e d f o r e x t r a c t i o n a n d c l e a n u p , a n d the selection of a s u i t a b l e m e t h o d w i l l d e p e n d o n w h a t c r o p or f o o d m a t e r i a l is b e i n g a n a l y z e d a n d the p e s t i c i d e or pesticides used. A n o t h e r d i s a d v a n t a g e of e n z y m e techniques is t h a t t h e y l a c k the specificity to d i s t i n g u i s h i n d i v i d u a l pesticides w h e n present as a m i x t u r e . M o s t of the m e t h o d s r e p o r t e d here ( T a b l e I I ) h a v e b e e n d e v e l o p e d for single c o m p o u n d s , a n d thus w h e r e m o r e t h a n one p e s t i c i d e is present, p r e l i m i n a r y separation t e c h n i q u e s are necessary.
Both paper and thin
l a y e r c h r o m a t o g r a p h i c t e c h n i q u e s d o not h a v e this d i s a d v a n t a g e a n d
In Pesticides Identification; Biros, F.; Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1971.
3.
V I L L E N E U V E
Enzymatic
Techniques
for
35
Analysis
of Analysis Referred to in the T e x t Comments
Downloaded by KTH ROYAL INST OF TECHNOLOGY on November 18, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1971 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1971-0104.ch003
Lower Limits of Detection 0.005-5.0 [xg/ml
T E P P residues detected o n lettuce a t levels of 3 p p m and up
1.0 m g / 1 0 cu. m . air
M e t h o d a p p l i e d t o t h e d e t e r m i n a t i o n of p a r a t h i o n in air
0.75 p p m
U s e d for t h e d e t e r m i n a t i o n of D i p t e r e x i n m i l k
0.60 p p m 0.001-0.1 t i g / m l 0.008-0.3 p p m
M e t h o d used for the e s t i m a t i o n of s y s t o x o n apples S e v i n d e t e r m i n e d as a residue o n peaches a t 35 p p m D e t e r m i n e d s i n g l y as residues i n m i l k
0.1-1.0 [ j L g / m l 0.02 p p m 0.2 p p m
Procedure applied to standards only Procedure applied to standards only A u t o a n a l y z e r procedure a p p l i e d t o apples, cabbage, rice, a n d w h e a t
1-10 [xg/ml 0.4-16 ( i g / m l
Procedure applied to standards only Procedure applied to standards only
0.05-1.0 t x g / m l 0 . 5 - 1 0 [xg/ml
Procedure applied to standards T h i n layer technique applied to standards only. V a r i o u s m e t h o d s of s a m p l e e x t r a c t i o n a n d c l e a n u p described M e v i n p h o s d e t e r m i n e d i n c r o p e x t r a c t s a t 0.05 p p m
0.01-0.3 [Lg/m\ 0 . 5 - 5 . 0 [Lg 0.01-3 [ A g 0.2-10 ng 0.001-0.1 [ig 0.2-4.0 p p m 0.75-8.0 p p m
Paper chromatographic technique applied to s t a n d ards only Paper chromatographic method applied to extracts of lettuce, s t r a w b e r r i e s , a n d apples T L C p r o c e d u r e ; a p p l i e d to s t a n d a r d s o n l y T L C procedure; applied to standards only T L C procedures; applied to potato extracts C o m b i n e d T L C - e n z y m e - i n h i b i t i o n procedure. I n secticides d e t e r m i n e d s i m u l t a n e o u s l y i n lettuce e x tracts
serve as excellent s c r e e n i n g t e c h n i q u e s .
H o w e v e r , b e f o r e the other e n -
z y m a t i c m e t h o d s c a n b e successfully a p p l i e d to the d e t e r m i n a t i o n of m u l t i - p e s t i c i d e residues, a p r e l i m i n a r y s e p a r a t i o n of the specific pesticides is essential. A t h i r d p r o b l e m is that m a n y o r g a n o p h o s p h o r u s pesticides are p o o r esterase i n h i b i t o r s in vitro
a n d n e e d to b e c o n v e r t e d to t h e i r o x y g e n
analogs i n o r d e r to o b t a i n sufficient i n h i b i t o r y p o t e n c y .
S o m e of the p r o -
cedures u s e d for this c o n v e r s i o n are s h o w n i n T a b l e I I I .
A g a i n , the
c h o i c e o f a s u i t a b l e p r o c e d u r e w i l l d e p e n d o n the t y p e o f assay u s e d a n d the pesticides i n q u e s t i o n . I n o u r laboratories, b r o m i n e v a p o r is u s e d
In Pesticides Identification; Biros, F.; Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1971.
36
PESTICIDES
Table III.
Methods for Converting Organophosphorus Pesticides to Active Esterase Inhibitors Method
Downloaded by KTH ROYAL INST OF TECHNOLOGY on November 18, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1971 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1971-0104.ch003
IDENTIFICATION
Reference
C o l d fuming nitric acid Dilute bromine water iV-Bromosuccinamide U V light H 0 - A c e t i c acid Bromine vapor Peracetic acid ra-Chloroperbenzoic acid H 0 2
2
2
2
(4) (9) (9, 21) (57) (17) (47) (37) (37) (37)
to a c c o m p l i s h a c t i v a t i o n of o r g a n o p h o s p h o r u s pesticides after s e p a r a t i o n on thin layer chromatograms.
H o w e v e r , the b r o m i n e also converts some
p l a n t constituents i n t o antiesterase c o m p o u n d s a n d thus a d d s a n e w source of interference. T h e r e are o t h e r d i s a d v a n t a g e s , s o m e of w h i c h are p e c u l i a r to the method employed.
F o r e x a m p l e , i n the case of the a u t o m a t e d analysis
d e s c r i b e d b y V o s s ( 8 ) , some of the p u m p t u b i n g u s e d w a s s u s c e p t i b l e to c o n t a m i n a t i o n b y c e r t a i n i n s e c t i c i d e s . O n e of t h e m o s t i m p o r t a n t advantages of these m e t h o d s is t h e i r sensitivity.
G e n e r a l l y , these m e t h o d s m e a s u r e s u b m i c r o g r a m q u a n t i t i e s
of the i n s e c t i c i d e i n q u e s t i o n a n d are m o r e sensitive t h a n most c h e m i c a l methods.
M o r e o v e r , e n z y m a t i c m e t h o d s c a n detect insecticides t h a t are
converted into metabolites w i t h a h i g h inhibitory potency. methods can be simple a n d rapid.
Enzymatic
A u t o m a t e d analyses, for
example,
p r o v i d e s i m p l e h i g h - p r e c i s i o n t e c h n i q u e s w i t h short i n c u b a t i o n p e r i o d s , h i g h s e n s i t i v i t y , a n d a d a p t a b i l i t y to r o u t i n e analyses. A s m e n t i o n e d p r e v i o u s l y , s u c h m e t h o d s are i n v a l u a b l e as s c r e e n i n g t e c h n i q u e s .
Summary A d e s c r i p t i o n of s e v e r a l anticholinesterase a n d anticarboxylesterase t e c h n i q u e s as t h e y are u s e d i n p e s t i c i d e r e s i d u e analysis has b e e n g i v e n . S o m e o t h e r e n z y m e t e c h n i q u e s h a v e also b e e n m e n t i o n e d , as w e l l as the advantages a n d disadvantages of these t e c h n i q u e s .
Literature Cited (1) (2) (3)
O'Brien, R. D . , "Toxic Phosphorus Esters," Ch. 3, Academic, N e w York, 1960. O'Brien, R. D., "Insecticides: A c t i o n and Metabolism," pp. 39-54, 8 6 - 9 5 , Academic, N e w York, 1967. Heath, D . F . , "Organophosphorus Poisons," Introductory Chapter, Pergamon, Oxford, 1961.
In Pesticides Identification; Biros, F.; Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1971.
Downloaded by KTH ROYAL INST OF TECHNOLOGY on November 18, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1971 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1971-0104.ch003
3.
V I L L E N E U V E
Enzymatic
Techniques
for
Analysis
37
(4) G i a n g , P . A., H a l l , S. A., A n a l . Chem. (1951) 2 3 , 1 8 3 0 - 4 . (5) O ' B r i e n , R . D., J. Agr. Food Chem. (1963) 11, 163. (6) Voss, G . , Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. (1968) 3, 343. (7) M a i n , A . R., Science (1964) 144, 9 9 2 - 3 . (8) Voss, G . , Residue Rev. (1968) 2 3 , 7 1 - 9 5 . (9) Archer, T . E . , " E n z y m a t i c M e t h o d s " in " A n a l y t i c a l Methods for Pesticides, Plant G r o w t h Regulators and F o o d Additives," Vol. 1, C h . 14, G . Zweig, Ed., Academic, N e w York, 1963. (10) Gage, J. C., Advan. Pest Control Res. (1961) 4, 183-210. (11) Schechter, M. S., Hornstein, I., Advan. Pest Control Res. (1957) 1, 3 5 3 447. (12) Cook, J . W . , J. Assoc. Offic. Anal. Chemists (1954) 37, 561-4. (13) Archer, T . E., Zweig, G . , J. Agr. Food Chem. (1959) 7, 178-81. (14) W i n t e r , G . D., Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. (1960) 87, 875. (15) W i n t e r , G . D . , Ferrari, A . , Residue Rev. (1964) 5, 139. (16) F i s c h l , J . , Pinto, N., Gordon, C., Clin. Chem. (1968) 14, 3 7 1 - 3 . (17) B e a m , J. E., Hankenson, D. J., J. Dairy Sci. (1964) XLVII, 1297-1305. (18) L e v i n e , J . B . , Scheidt, R. A., Nelson, V. A., Technicon Symposium, " A u t o mation i n Analytical Chemistry," p. 582, N e w York, 1965. (19) Voss, G . , J. Econ. Entomol. (1966) 59, 1288. (20) Guilbault, G . G . , Kramer, D. N., Anal. Chem. (1965) 37, 1675-80. (21) Schultzmann, R. L., Barthel, W . F., J. Assoc. Offic. Anal. Chemists (1969) 52, 151-6. (22) Benyon, K . I., Stoydin, G . , Nature (1965) 208, 748-50. (23) H i m e l , C . M., M a y e r , R. T . , J. Georgia Entomol. Soc. (1970) 5, 31-8. (24) H i m e l , C . M., Mayer, R. T . , Cook, L. L., J. Polymer Sci. (1970) Pt. A-1, 8, 2219-30. (25) H i m e l , C . M., Aboul-Saad, W. G . , U k , S., J. Agr. Food Chem., i n press, 1971. (26) H i m e l , C . M., private communication, 1970. (27) D i x o n , M., W e b b , E . C., " E n z y m e s , " p. 732, Longmans, Green and C o . Ltd., 1965. (28) Barron, K . D., Bernsohn, J. I., Hess, A., J. Histochem. Cytochem. (1961) 9, 656-60. (29) Bernsohn, J., Barron, K . D., Hess, A., Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med. (1961) 108, 7 1 - 3 . (30) Cook, J. W . , Blake, J., Y i p , G., W i l l i a m s , M., J. Assoc. Offic. Agr. Chemists (1958) 4 1 , 399-407. (31) Ecobichon, D . J., K a l o w , W . , Can. J . Biochem. Physiol. (1961) 39, 1329-32. (32) Holmes, R. S., Masters, C . J., Biochem. Biophys. Acta (1968) 151, 147-58. (33) Lawrence, S. H., Melnick, P. J., W e i m e r , H. E., Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med. (1960) 105, 5 7 2 - 5 . (34) M a i n , A . R., B r a i d , P . E., Biochem. J. (1962) 84, 2 5 5 - 6 3 . (35) Norgaard, M. J., Montgomery, M. W . , Biochim. Biophys. Acta (1968) 151, 587-96. (36) Seume, F . W . , Casida, J. E., O'Brien, R. D., J. Agr. Food Chem. (1960) 8, 4 3 - 7 . (37) D i x o n , G . H., Neurath, H., Pechere, J. F., Ann. Rev. Biochem. (1958) 27, 489-532. (38) F r u t o n , J . S., Harvey Lecture Ser. (1955-56) 5 1 , 6 4 - 8 7 . (39) Aldridge, W . N., Biochem. J. (1950) 46, 451-60. (40) M a i n , A. R., Dauterman, W. C., Nature (1963) 196, 5 5 1 - 3 . (41) M a i n , A. R., Iverson, F., Biochem. J. (1966) 100, 5 2 5 - 3 1 . (42) M c K i n l e y , W . P . , Read, S. I., J. Assoc. Offic. Agr. Chemists (1962) 4 5 , 467-73.
In Pesticides Identification; Biros, F.; Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1971.
Downloaded by KTH ROYAL INST OF TECHNOLOGY on November 18, 2015 | http://pubs.acs.org Publication Date: June 1, 1971 | doi: 10.1021/ba-1971-0104.ch003
38
PESTICIDES
IDENTIFICATION
(43) Ackermann, H., Nahrung (1966) 10, 273-4. (44) Ackermann, H., J. Chromatog. (1968) 36, 309-17. (45) M e n d o z a , C . E., Wales, P . J., M c L e o d , H. A., M c K i n l e y , W . P . , Analyst (1968) 9 3 , 3 4 - 8 . (46) Wales, P . J . , M e n d o z a , C . E., M c L e o d , H. A., M c K i n l e y , W . P . , Analyst (1968) 9 3 , 6 9 1 - 3 . (47) Villeneuve, D . C., Butterfield, A . G . , M c C u l l y , K . A . , Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. (1969) 4, 232-9. (48) Geike, F., J. Chromatog. (1969) 44, 95-102. (49) Ackermann, H., Nahrung (1968) 12, 357-62. (50) B r o w n , H. V., Bush, A. F., Arch. Ind. Hyg. (1950) 1, 633-6. (51) M e n n , J . J . , M c B a i n , J. B . , Dennis, M. J., Nature (1964) 202, 697-8. (52) D u B o i s , K . P . , Gladys, J. C., Arch. Ind. Health (1955) 11, 53-60. (53) Voss, Gunther, J. Assoc. Offic. Anal. Chemists (1969) 52, 1027-34. (54) Guilbault, G . G . , Lubrano, G . J., Anal. Chim. Acta (1968) 4 3 , 2 5 3 - 6 1 . (55) Guilbault, G . C., Sadar, M. H., Zimmer, M., Anal. Chim. Acta (1969) 44, 361-7. (56) M c K i n l e y , W . P . , Johal, P . S., J. Assoc. Offic. Agr. Chemists (1963) 46, 840-2. (57) Ackermann, H., Arch. Toxikol. (1969) 24, 325-31. RECEIVED
June 12, 1970.
In Pesticides Identification; Biros, F.; Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1971.