Pesticides Identification at the Residue Level

T n keeping with the theme of this volume, identification of pesticides at the residue .... with pigeon serum protein; antiserum to sheep globulin wil...
1 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size
11 Analysis of Pesticide Residues: Immunological Techniques C. D .

ERCEGOVICH

Department of Entomology and Pesticide Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, P a . 16802

Past investigations

which

on immunological degradation

DDT,

are limited

groups.

in developing

Two

antisera

logical

clearly

or fortified

demonstrate

methods

methods for

couraged.

were

methods

are

were

aminotriazole, detected

screening

and by

immuno-

of as

and

confirmatory

and

disadvantages

analysis

their

results

immunological

The development analysis

None

for the

however,

usefulness

of

several

of investigators.

samples;

pesticide

successful

a metabolite

of such methods

pesticides.

advantages

pesticides

DDA,

readily

residue

for

rapid The

for

a potential

methods for detecting nological

their sepa-

by the third group

had shown the practicality of actual

and

Parathion,

products

methods

conducted

to those of only three

of these groups

specific

and malathion.

degradation

to have been

methods for analyzing

products

rate research

are known

of

immu-

supplemental test is of

ensuch

discussed.

T n k e e p i n g w i t h the t h e m e of this v o l u m e , i d e n t i f i c a t i o n of pesticides at the r e s i d u e ( s u b m i c r o g r a m ) l e v e l , t h e questions of w h a t a p p l i c a t i o n s of i m m u n o l o g i c a l t e c h n i q u e s h a v e b e e n u s e d i n the past, a n d w h a t p o t e n t i a l usefulness d o these t e c h n i q u e s h a v e for these purposes i n t h e f u t u r e are c o n s i d e r e d . T h e t o p i c considers b o t h i m m u n o l o g i c a l a n d s e r o l o g i c a l t e c h n i q u e s . I m m u n o l o g y , i n a r e s t r i c t e d sense, deals w i t h t h e p r o c e d u r e s u s e d a n d the m e c h a n i s m s i n v o l v e d w h e r e b y a host establishes resistance to a disease ( i m m u n e state) after a specific exposure to a f o r e i g n i n f e c tious agent ( a n t i g e n ) .

I n a b r o a d e r sense, i m m u n o l o g y is c o n c e r n e d

w i t h h y p e r s e n s i t i v e b i o l o g i c a l p h e n o m e n a of a l t e r e d tissue r e a c t i v i t y s u c h as allergies, a c q u i r e d tolerances to a n d rejection of f o r e i g n tissue, a n d a u t o i m m u n e diseases.

S e r o l o g y is a b r a n c h of b i o l o g i c a l science 162

con-

11.

ERCEGOVICH

Immunological

163

Techniques

c e r n e d w i t h the d i a g n o s t i c a n d e x p e r i m e n t a l p r o c e d u r e s b y w h i c h a n t i g e n a n t i b o d y reactions c a n b e s t u d i e d .

I t is so n a m e d b e c a u s e

serology

i n v o l v e s the use of s e r u m . S i n c e m a n y i m m u n e reactions are s t u d i e d b y s e r o l o g i c a l t e c h n i q u e s , i t is p e r m i s s i b l e to refer to t h e t o p i c m e r e l y as i m m u n o l o g i c a l techniques. T h e average p e s t i c i d e r e s i d u e c h e m i s t o r toxicologist m a y h a v e n o o r o n l y a s u p e r f i c i a l k n o w l e d g e of i m m u n o l o g y a n d serology. his f a m i l i a r i t y w i t h these sciences is l i m i t e d to a s o p h o m o r i c

Perhaps knowledge

of t h e i r r e l a t i o n to i m m u n i z a t i o n i n disease p r e v e n t i o n , diagnosis

for

allergies, b l o o d t y p i n g , a n d disease resistance. C e r t a i n l y these are a m o n g t h e p r i m a r y concerns of i m m u n o l o g y a n d serology, a n d m o r e

recently

the i m p o r t a n c e of i m m u n i z a t i o n as i t a p p l i e s to the r e j e c t i o n of o r g a n transplants has g i v e n s p e c i a l i m p o r t a n c e to these

fields.

Because

these

sciences are h i g h l y s p e c i a l i z e d , i t m a y b e w o r t h w h i l e to r e v i e w b r i e f l y some of t h e i r u n d e r l y i n g p r i n c i p l e s to assist better the p e s t i c i d e researcher to g a i n a n u n d e r s t a n d i n g a n d a p p r e c i a t i o n of h o w these t e c h n i q u e s m a y a p p l y to his interests. S i n c e o n l y a l i m i t e d d i s c u s s i o n of b a s i c p r i n c i p l e s and methodology

c a n b e p r e s e n t e d here, the r e a d e r is r e f e r r e d to ex-

cellent monographs W e i s e r et ah (4)

b y B u r r o w s et ah

(I),

D a y (2),

Gary (3),

f o r the g e n e r a l p r i n c i p l e s of i m m u n o l o g y ,

c h e m i s t r y , a n d i m m u n e reactions, L a n d s t e i n e r ( 5 ) , Pressman a n d Grossberg (7)

Nezlin

and

immuno(6),

and

for a better u n d e r s t a n d i n g a b o u t t h e b i o -

c h e m i s t r y a n d specificity of a n t i b o d i e s , a n d C a m p b e l l et ah ( 8 ) , K a b a t and Mayer (9), C h a s e (12)

Kwapinski

(10),

Nowotny

(11),

and Williams and

for specific a n d d e t a i l e d i n f o r m a t i o n a b o u t

methodology.

General Principles E s s e n t i a l l y , w h e n a f o r e i g n p r o t e i n , a n t i g e n , is i n j e c t e d i n t o a s u i t a b l e a n i m a l , t h e o r g a n i s m responds b y p r o d u c i n g a specific p r o t e i n c a l l e d a n a n t i b o d y . T h e i m m u n o l o g i c a l response of a n a n i m a l to t h e i n i t i a l i n j e c t i o n of a n a n t i g e n i c substance is not i m m e d i a t e , b u t after a s u i t a b l e i n c u b a t i o n p e r i o d the p r o p e r t i e s of t h e b l o o d s e r u m i n respect to the a n t i g e n are a l t e r e d . T h i s effect is d e m o n s t r a t e d b y the p r o d u c t i o n of a n i m m u n e s e r u m , a n t i s e r u m , w h i c h differs f r o m n o r m a l s e r u m i n t h a t i t reacts e i t h e r in vivo or in vitro w i t h the h o m o l o g o u s a n t i g e n . T h i s p r o p erty of a n t i s e r u m is the result of the presence of a n t i b o d i e s ,

substances

w h i c h are f o r m e d b y the o r g a n i s m i n response to t h e i n j e c t e d a n t i g e n . T h e a n t i b o d y is f o u n d i n the largest a m o u n t a n d most c o n v e n i e n t f o r m i n the b l o o d s e r u m a n d is i n t i m a t e l y associated w i t h the s e r u m p r o t e i n . A n t i s e r u m m a y c o n t a i n f r o m 1 to 5 or e v e n m o r e , m g p e r m l of a n t i b o d y protein.

T h e a n t i b o d y a c t i v i t y g e n e r a l l y is l o c a l i z e d i n t h e g l o b u l i n

f r a c t i o n of the s e r u m p r o t e i n . T h e i m m u n e g l o b u l i n , h o w e v e r , is i n d i s t i n g u i s h a b l e f r o m n o r m a l s e r u m g l o b u l i n b y c h e m i c a l analysis. A n t i b o d y

164

PESTICIDES

IDENTIFICATION

a c t i v i t y of a n t i s e r u m m a y b e d e s t r o y e d b y d e n a t u r a t i o n w i t h heat, a l c o h o l , o r u r e a a n d b y d e g r a d a t i o n w i t h s t r o n g a c i d or a l k a l i . I m m u n e g l o b u l i n reacts w i t h substances s u c h as

1 3 1

I or fluorescent d y e s to l a b e l t h e a n t i b o d y

f o r v a r i o u s e x p e r i m e n t a l purposes w i t h o u t loss of a c t i v i t y . A l t h o u g h the s t i m u l a t i o n of a n t i b o d y p r o d u c t i o n is u s u a l l y o b s e r v e d w i t h p r o t e i n s , c e r t a i n p o l y s a c c h a r i d e s , s u c h as the c a p s u l a r c o m p o n e n t s of p n e u m o c o c c i a n d other m i c r o o r g a n i s m s , are also a n t i g e n i c . T h e a n t i genic

property

of

substances

is v a r i a b l e i n t h a t some antigens

give

m a r k e d i m m u n e response w h i l e others s t i m u l a t e o n l y a l o w g r a d e i m m u n e response as d e m o n s t r a t e d b y the s m a l l a m o u n t of a n t i b o d y p r o d u c t i o n . Substances s u c h as o v a l b u m i n , s e r u m g l o b u l i n , d i p h t h e r i a t o x i n , a n d tetanus toxoids are examples of g o o d antigens w h i l e

hemoglobin,

n u c l e o p r o t e i n s , a n d histones are p o o r antigens. G o o d antigens are g e n e r a l l y n a t u r a l l y o c c u r r i n g substances of r e l a t i v e l y l a r g e m o l e c u l a r size, at least p a r t i a l l y d i g e s t i b l e b y

enzymes,

a n d are f o r e i g n o r

contain

structures w h i c h are f o r e i g n to t h e a n t i b o d y - p r o d u c i n g a n i m a l . T h e n a t u r a l l y o c c u r r i n g proteins w h i c h are g o o d antigens u s u a l l y c o n t a i n a f u l l c o m p l e m e n t of a m i n o acids. A n u m b e r of d e r i v e d p r o t e i n s , n o t a b l y g e l a t i n , are n o t a n t i g e n i c , or o n l y f e e b l y a n t i g e n i c , e v e n t h o u g h they may be of h i g h molecular weight.

T h e p o o r a n t i g e n i c p r o p e r t y of

g e l a t i n is t h o u g h t to b e c a u s e d b y its deficiency i n a r o m a t i c a m i n o a c i d s , t h o u g h t h e r e is l i t t l e d e f i n i t i v e e v i d e n c e f o r this belief.

Large molecular

size i n v a r i a b l y a c c o m p a n i e s the a b i l i t y to s t i m u l a t e a n t i b o d y f o r m a t i o n , t h o u g h a l l l a r g e m o l e c u l e s are not a n t i g e n i c . T h e r e is some c o r r e l a t i o n b e t w e e n r e l a t i v e a n t i g e n i c i t y a n d m o l e c u l a r w e i g h t since n a t u r a l l y occ u r r i n g substances h a v i n g m o l e c u l a r w e i g h t s of less t h a n a b o u t

40,000,

e.g. l y s o z y m e , p r o t a m i n e s , histones, a n d i n s u l i n , are p o o r antigens. sistent w i t h this i n f o r m a t i o n t h e a n t i g e n i c i t y of a p r o t e i n

Con-

disappears

r a p i d l y u p o n e n z y m a t i c h y d r o l y s i s , a n d proteoses a n d p o l y p e p t i d e s

are

n o t a n t i g e n i c . I t is p o s s i b l e t h a t h i g h m o l e c u l a r w e i g h t s y n t h e t i c p o l y m e r s are a n t i g e n i c , b u t w i t h t h e e x c e p t i o n of p o l y v i n y l p y r r o l i d o n e n o n e are f o u n d to b e a n t i g e n i c . A p r e r e q u i s i t e for a n t i g e n i c i t y is t h a t the a n t i g e n b e f o r e i g n a n d d i s t i n g u i s h a b l e as "not-self" b y the a n t i b o d y - p r o d u c i n g organisms.

The

f o r e i g n q u a l i t y of antigens is of v a r y i n g d e g r e e a n d is reflected i n t h e specificity of t h e a n t i g e n - a n t i b o d y r e a c t i o n .

W i d e l y different

antigens

a p p e a r to b e q u i t e u n r e l a t e d i m m u n o l o g i c a l l y w h i l e closely r e l a t e d a n t i gens s h o w cross-reaction of v a r y i n g degree w i t h a p p r o p r i a t e heterologous a n t i b o d y a n d b e h a v e as p o o r antigens w h e n t h e y are closely r e l a t e d to c o n s t i t u e n t antigens of the i m m u n i z e d a n i m a l . A n t i g e n i c

substances,

therefore, f r o m one species of a n i m a l s t i m u l a t e a n t i b o d y f o r m a t i o n i n a n o t h e r a n i m a l species, a n d antigens of p l a n t o r i g i n are a n t i g e n i c i n animals.

11.

ERCEGOVICH

Immunological

165

Techniques

T h i s specificity is r e a d i l y i l l u s t r a t e d b y t h e f o l l o w i n g e x a m p l e .

Serum

p r o t e i n s , w h i c h are a m o n g t h e most c o m m o n l y u s e d antigens, f r o m sheep, horse, c h i c k e n , m a n , etc., b u t n o t h o m o l o g o u s r a b b i t s e r u m , are a n t i g e n i c i n r a b b i t . S i m i l a r l y t h e s e r u m p r o t e i n f r o m r a b b i t , sheep, horse a n d m a n , b u t not the h o m o l o g o u s c h i c k e n s e r u m p r o t e i n , are a n t i g e n i c i n c h i c k e n . S p e c i f i c i t y is also expressed

i n the r e a c t i o n o f a n t i g e n w i t h

antibody.

F o r instance, a n t i s e r u m to horse s e r u m p r o t e i n p r e p a r e d i n the r a b b i t w i l l r e a c t in vitro o n l y w i t h the h o m o l o g o u s horse s e r u m p r o t e i n a n t i g e n a n d w i l l n o t react w i t h s e r u m p r o t e i n f r o m c h i c k e n , cattle, m a n , r a b b i t , etc.

S p e c i f i c i t y of this n a t u r e is r e f e r r e d t o as species specificity.

the other h a n d , specificity is less s h a r p b e t w e e n r e l a t e d sources.

antigens f r o m

On

closely

T h e a n t i s e r u m to c h i c k e n s e r u m p r o t e i n w i l l also react

w i t h p i g e o n s e r u m p r o t e i n ; a n t i s e r u m to sheep g l o b u l i n w i l l react w i t h beef s e r u m g l o b u l i n , etc., b u t the heterologous r e a c t i o n is w e a k e r t h a n t h a t of the h o m o l o g o u s a n t i g e n . E x p e r i m e n t a l e v i d e n c e e s t a b l i s h e d t h a t the specificity of is d e t e r m i n e d b y t h e i r c h e m i c a l c o m p o s i t i o n .

antigens

Experiments w i t h a variety

of a n t i g e n i c proteins s h o w e d that i m m u n o l o g i c a l l y i d e n t i c a l proteins are, as f a r as c a n b e d e t e r m i n e d , i d e n t i c a l i n c o m p o s i t i o n . differing

from

one

another

i n composition

Antigenic proteins

are also

immunologically

d i s t i n c t w h i l e antigens s h o w i n g some degree of cross-reaction are closely r e l a t e d i n c h e m i c a l structure. T h r o u g h the s t u d y of a l t e r e d specificity and

a r t i f i c i a l antigens

e v i d e n c e has b e e n g a i n e d that

specificity is a p r o p e r t y of m o l e c u l a r c o n f i g u r a t i o n .

immunological

Antigenic protein

m a y b e h e a t e d , p a r t i a l l y d e n a t u r e d , or t r e a t e d w i t h f o r m a l d e h y d e i n s u c h a w a y that p a r t of the o r i g i n a l specificity is lost, b u t species specificity remains, although

somewhat

broadened.

Treatment

of

protein

with

i o d i n e , n i t r i c a c i d , o r n i t r o u s a c i d alters t h e specificity of the a n t i g e n so p r o f o u n d l y that species specificity is d e s t r o y e d . L a n d s t e i n e r a n d colleagues

(5)

h a v e s h o w n that species specificity

of antigens m a y be a l t e r e d i n w a y s other t h a n b y a t t a c k i n g the a r o m a t i c moieties of p r o t e i n as w i t h i o d i n e a n d acids.

T h e a d d i t i o n of

small

r a d i c a l s , a c e t y l , e t h y l , or m e t h y l , to large p r o t e i n molecules b y a c e t y l a t i o n w i t h acetic a n h y d r i d e , esterification w i t h e t h y l a l c o h o l , or m e t h y l a t i o n w i t h d i a z o m e t h a n e , r e s p e c t i v e l y , results i n p r o n o u n c e d changes i n s p e c i ficity

of the o r i g i n a l p r o t e i n m o l e c u l e .

The immunological

properties

of e g g a l b u m i n h a v e b e e n a l t e r e d t h r o u g h p h o s p h o r y l a t i o n . U p to this p o i n t w e h a v e b e e n c o n c e r n e d

primarily with

so-called

c o m p l e t e antigens, substances w h i c h b o t h s t i m u l a t e a n t i b o d y p r o d u c t i o n a n d react w i t h the a n t i b o d y so f o r m e d .

O t h e r substances, h o w e v e r , h a v e

a m o r e l i m i t e d antigenicity—e.g., w h i l e t h e y react specifically w i t h a n t i b o d y , t h e y are u n a b l e to s t i m u l a t e a n t i b o d y f o r m a t i o n . T h e s e

substances

are p a r t i a l antigens o r haptens. T h e use of i m m u n o l o g i c a l a n d serological

166

PESTICIDES

IDENTIFICATION

t e c h n i q u e s to detect a n d a n a l y z e pesticides d e p e n d s o n the u n d e r s t a n d i n g of haptens. H a p t e n s are s u b d i v i d e d i n t o t w o groups b y some w o r k ers. O n e of these is m a d e u p of haptens w h i c h react w i t h a n t i b o d y in vitro

to g i v e the u s u a l s e r o l o g i c a l r e a c t i o n s ; the other g r o u p

includes

those substances w h i c h react w i t h a n t i b o d y , b u t w i t h o u t overt e v i d e n c e of t h e r e a c t i o n , a n d the a n t i g e n - a n t i b o d y r e a c t i o n is d e m o n s t r a b l e i n d i r e c t l y as a n interference o r i n h i b i t i o n p h e n o m e n o n .

only

T h e latter is a

c o n s e q u e n c e of the s t r u c t u r e of the h a p t e n a n d is not r e l a t e d t o its a n t i g e n i c specificity.

T h e d e f i n i t i o n of a h a p t e n has v a r i e d since the

w o r d w a s first u s e d b y L a n d s t e i n e r i n 1921 to refer to s i m p l e o r g a n i c residues t h a t react specifically w i t h a n t i b o d i e s .

H o w e v e r , none describe

w h a t is r e a l l y m e a n t as w e l l as the o r i g i n a l G r e e k m e a n i n g , to t o u c h , to grasp, a n d to fasten ( 2 ) .

B y simple immunobiological definition hap-

tens are d e s c r i b e d as p a r t i a l antigens w h i c h i n themselves are i n c a p a b l e of i n d u c i n g a n t i b o d y f o r m a t i o n i n a n i m a l s , b u t w h i c h , w h e n to o r d i n a r y i m m u n o g e n s

s u c h as proteins a n d p o l y s a c c h a r i d e s ,

a n t i b o d y f o r m a t i o n against themselves.

attached induce

O t h e r s u b s t a n c e s — s u c h as c o l -

l o d i o n p a r t i c l e s , sephadex, r e d b l o o d cells, a n d c h a r c o a l — h a v e b e e n u s e d as t h e c a r r i e r m a t e r i a l for haptens.

H a p t e n s r a n g e i n size f r o m s m a l l

o r g a n i c c o m p o u n d s s u c h as p - a m i n o b e n z o i c a c i d (5, 13) c h a i n s (14,

to p o l y p e p t i d e

15).

T h e influence of the a d d i t i o n of r e l a t i v e l y s i m p l e o r g a n i c r a d i c a l s o n the i m m u n o l o g i c a l specificity of a n t i g e n i c proteins has b e e n e x p l a i n e d b y the s t u d y of the i m m u n o l o g i c a l b e h a v i o r of a v a r i e t y of c o m p o u n d s p r e p a r e d f r o m p r o t e i n a n d t h e d i a z o n i u m d e r i v a t i v e s of a n u m b e r

of

m e t h y l , c h l o r o , b r o m o , a n d n i t r o s u b s t i t u t i o n p r o d u c t s of a n i l i n e , o-,

m-,

a n d p - a m i n o b e n z e n e s u l f o n i c a c i d , p - a m i n o p h e n y l a r s e n i c a c i d , a n d o-,

m-,

a n d p - a m i n o c i n n a m i c a c i d as w e l l are the p a r e n t c o m p o u n d

13).

(16, 5,

F r o m studies of this n a t u r e i t b e c a m e a p p a r e n t t h a t t h e i m m u n o l o g i c a l b e h a v i o r of antigens c a n b e m o d i f i e d specifically b y a l t e r i n g a r e l a t i v e l y s m a l l p a r t of the l a r g e p r o t e i n m o l e c u l e a n d t h a t the specificity of the a n t i g e n is d e t e r m i n e d b y t h e c h e m i c a l s t r u c t u r e of this a d d e d p a r t .

The

s p a t i a l a r r a n g e m e n t i n the d e t e r m i n a t i v e groups, as w e l l as t h e i r n a t u r e , is reflected i n i m m u n o l o g i c a l b e h a v i o r .

T h e p o s i t i o n of o r t h o , m e t a , o r

p a r a substitutions i n a r o m a t i c r a d i c a l s a t t a c h e d to proteins p r o d u c e s d i f ferences i n specificity. T h e stereo isomers of t a r t a r i c a c i d a n d p - a m i n o b e n z o y l p h e n y l a c e t i c a c i d y i e l d i m m u n o l o g i c a l l y d i s t i n c t antigens w h e n c o u p l e d w i t h p r o t e i n , a n d the p o s i t i o n of a m i n o acids i n p e p t i d e - a z o p r o teins is a factor i n d e t e r m i n i n g i m m u n o l o g i c a l specificity. T h e i m m u n o l o g i c a l f u n c t i o n s of the haptens n o w are c l e a r i n t h e i r r o l e as d e t e r m i n a n t s of i m m u n o l o g i c a l specificity.

T h e relative impor-

t a n c e of h a p t e n - d e t e r m i n e d specificity is v e r y great since a l a r g e p o r t i o n of n a t u r a l l y o c c u r r i n g a n t i g e n i c substances are c o n j u g a t e d antigens c o n -

11.

ERCEGOVICH

Immunological

167

Techniques

sisting of a p r o t e i n a n d a h a p t e n . T h i s is i l l u s t r a t e d f o r some p n e u m o coccus w h o s e p o l y s a c c h a r i d e c a p s u l a r substance acts as a h a p t e n a n d p r o v i d e s the a n t i g e n i c specificity r e q u i r e d to p r o d u c e the i n j e c t e d m i c r o o r g a n i s m s .

a n i m m u n i t y to

I m m u n e response, o f t e n m a n i f e s t e d as a

h y p e r s e n s i t i v i t y , to l o w m o l e c u l a r w e i g h t substances s u c h as d r u g s , dyes, c u t t i n g oils, a n d s i m i l a r substances r e s p o n s i b l e for o c c u p a t i o n a l d e r m a titis, o c c u r f r e q u e n t l y .

It is p r o b a b l e t h a t these

low-molecular-weight

substances f u n c t i o n as a h a p t e n b y c o m b i n i n g w i t h the host's p r o t e i n , thus a l t e r i n g t h e i r specificity so t h a t t h e y b e c o m e f o r e i g n , substances w h i c h p r o v o k e i m m u n e responses.

antigenic

The antibody formed re-

acts specifically w i t h the h a p t e n i c substance p r o d u c i n g a l l e r g i c reactions. S e n s i t i z a t i o n to p e n i c i l l i n , w h i c h is r e l a t i v e l y often

observed,

is

an

excellent e x a m p l e of this p h e n o m e n o n .

Past Attempted Uses of Immunological Techniques for Pesticide Analysis I m m u n o l o g i c a l t e c h n i q u e s h a v e b e e n u s e d e x t e n s i v e l y i n the of m e d i c i n e to s t u d y the causes a n d t r e a t m e n t of diseases.

field

The protein

a n d e n z y m e c h e m i s t has also u s e d i m m u n o l o g i c a l m e t h o d s to g o o d a d vantage to isolate, p u r i f y , a n d s t u d y proteins. I n a g r i c u l t u r e s u c h m e t h ods h a v e b e e n u s e d b y the v i r o l o g i s t w h o uses a n t i g e n - a n t i b o d y reactions to diagnose p l a n t diseases.

T h e v e t e r i n a r i a n uses these t e c h n i q u e s

to

diagnose a n i m a l diseases a n d to i d e n t i f y p a t h o g e n i c b a c t e r i a a n d viruses. E n t o m o l o g i s t s h a v e u s e d i m m u n o l o g i c a l m e t h o d s to s t u d y the v e n o m of insects a n d to d e v e l o p w a y s of i m m u n i z i n g against s u c h substances. h a v e also u s e d i m m u n o s p e c i f i c i t y as a c r i t e r i o n to s t u d y t h e

They

differences

i n v a r i o u s insect e n z y m e s — e . g . , a c e t y l cholinesterase a n d D D T - d e h y d r o c h l o r i n a s e — t o u n d e r s t a n d the m o d e of a c t i o n of insecticides a n d t h e m e c h a n i s m of insect resistance to insecticides. A t t e m p t s to u t i l i z e the specificity of a n t i g e n - a n t i b o d y r e a c t i o n f o r the analysis of pesticides a p p e a r to h a v e b e e n l i m i t e d to w o r k of C e n t e n o et al. (17)

a n d H a a s a n d G u a r d i a (18).

T h e former group postulated,

because of observations of a l l e r g i c contact s e n s i t i v i t y to m a l a t h i o n a n d scattered reports a b o u t u n u s u a l reactions to D D T , t h a t c o m m o n pesticides m i g h t act as a n t i g e n i c a n d a l l e r g i c d e t e r m i n a n t s , p r o v i d e d t h e y b e c o m e c o u p l e d to a n a p p r o p r i a t e p r o t e i n c a r r i e r . T o test this postulate, t h e y s t u d i e d the i m m u n o g e n i c i t y

of

p r o t e i n conjugates

of

closely

related

d e r i v a t i v e s of D D T a n d m a l a t h i o n , the m e t a b o l i t e D D A , [2,2-bis( p - c h l o r o p h e n y l ) acetic a c i d ] , a n d [ 0 , 0 - d i m e t h y l S - ( l , 2 - b i s c a r b o x y e t h y l ) phorodithioate].

phos-

T h e i r results w e r e h i g h l y significant b e c a u s e t h e y w e r e

a b l e to p r o d u c e a n t i b o d i e s i n r a b b i t s to the a b o v e h a p t e n s w h e n

con-

j u g a t e d to b o v i n e s e r u m a l b u m i n ( B S A ) , D D A - B S A , a n d m a l a t h i o n - B S A , respectively.

168

PESTICIDES

IDENTIFICATION

A method for ascertaining the antibody titer of the respective a n t i sera w a s d e v e l o p e d u s i n g a b i s ( d i a z o t i z e d - b e n z i d i n e ) system.

hemagglutination

T h o u g h significant titers to these conjugates w e r e d e t e c t e d

a l l of t h e a n i m a l s , t h e c o n j u g a t e d

in

malathion antigen elicited antibody

response i n m u c h h i g h e r t i t e r a n d after f e w e r injections t h a n d i d t h e D D A a n t i g e n . G e l d i f f u s i o n tests e s t a b l i s h e d t h e specificity of r e a c t i o n b e t w e e n a n t i s e r a to D D A - B S A a n d m a l a t h i o n - B S A w i t h t h e i r respective homologous B S A antigen.

T h e antisera to m a l a t h i o n - B S A g a v e n o

de-

t e c t a b l e p r e c i p i t i n r e a c t i o n w i t h b o v i n e s e r u m a l b u m i n , i n d i c a t i n g that the c a r r i e r p r o t e i n u n d e r w e n t m a r k e d c o n f i g u r a t i o n a l changes d u r i n g c o n j u g a t i o n o r t h a t some of its a n t i g e n i c d e t e r m i n a n t g r o u p s w e r e m a s k e d . C e n t e n o et al. (17)

also stress that t h e D D A - B S A a n d m a l a t h i o n - B S A

conjugates d i d n o t react w i t h a n t i s e r a to b o v i n e s e r u m a l b u m i n , i n d i c a t i n g t h a t t h e y w e r e a n t i g e n i c a l l y different f r o m t h e o r i g i n a l c a r r i e r p r o t e i n . T h e i r s t u d y d e m o n s t r a t e d that a n t i b o d i e s to D D T a n d m a l a t h i o n m e t a b o lites are r e a d i l y p r o d u c e d , a n d t h e y suggest t h a t these a n t i b o d i e s

serve

for t h e d e v e l o p m e n t of sensitive h i s t o l o g i c a l p r o c e d u r e s a l o n g w i t h r a d i o immunochemical and

fluorescein

l a b e l l i n g t e c h n i q u e s , to d e t e r m i n e

the

l o c a l i z a t i o n of these c h e m i c a l s i n a n i m a l tissues. T h e r e p o r t b y H a a s a n d G u a r d i a (18)

p e r t a i n s to t h e i r efforts

to

a p p l y i m m u n o l o g i c a l m e t h o d s f o r the assay of p e s t i c i d e residues, a n d expresses t h e i r a i m to test t h e s u i t a b i l i t y of m e t h o d s for field a n a l y t i c a l purposes.

H a a s a n d G u a r d i a also u s e d D D T a n d m a l a t h i o n to represent

t w o of the most i m p o r t a n t classes of i n s e c t i c i d e s , c h l o r i n a t e d h y d r o c a r bons a n d organophosphorus

compounds.

T h e y first a t t e m p t e d t o p r e p a r e

i n s e c t i c i d e - p r o t e i n antigens i n w h i c h enzymes w e r e u s e d as t h e p r o t e i n c a r r i e r . A n t i s e r u m of r a b b i t s i n j e c t e d w i t h D D A - c a r b o n i c a n h y d r a s e or m a l a t h i o n - c h y m o t r y p s i n f a i l e d t o s h o w t h e presence o f t h e

respective

antibodies. T h e y e x p e r i m e n t e d w i t h f o u r o t h e r proteins as c a r r i e r s : r a b b i t s e r u m albumin, bovine serum albumin, bovine

fibrinogen

fraction I, a n d bovine

/ ^ - g l o b u l i n f r a c t i o n I I I . T h e s t r u c t u r a l l y r e l a t e d d e r i v a t i v e s of D D T a n d malathion, D D A , and 0 , 0 - d i m e t h y l S-carboxy-carboxyethyl

phosphoro-

d i t h i o a t e ( m a l a t h i o n h a l f e s t e r ) , r e s p e c t i v e l y , w e r e u s e d as t h e

specific

haptens a t t a c h e d to these c a r r i e r proteins. T h e s e c o m p o u n d s c o n t a i n free carboxyl groups, w h i c h w h e n they reacted w i t h thionylchloride, provide a means of c o u p l i n g of the h a p t e n to the a m i n o groups of the p r o t e i n c a r r i e r . U n l i k e C e n t e n o et al. (17)

H a a s a n d G u a r d i a c o u l d not s h o w t h e

p r e s e n c e of a n t i b o d i e s i n t h e a n t i s e r u m of r a b b i t s i m m u n i z e d w i t h the h a p t e n conjugates of b o v i n e s e r u m a l b u m i n . T h e results w i t h ^ - g l o b u l i n conjugates w e r e ester

inconsistent, w h e r e a s

conjugates w i t h

fibrinogen

the D D A a n d m a l a t h i o n h a l f -

g a v e the

best

antigenic

responses.

T h r o u g h the s e r o l o g i c a l test m e t h o d s of p r e c i p i t a t i o n , t a n n e d c e l l h e m a g -

11.

ERCEGOVICH

Immunological

169

Techniques

glutination, and tanned cell hemagglutination inhibition they s t r a t e d t h e presence fibrinogen

demon-

of a n t i b o d i e s to D D A - f i b r i n o g e n a n d m a l a t h i o n -

i n t h e a n t i s e r u m of the r e s p e c t i v e l y i m m u n i z e d r a b b i t s .

U s i n g t h e t a n n e d c e l l h e m a g g l u t i n a t i o n i n h i b i t i o n test, t h e y d e t e r m i n e d t h a t t h e s e n s i t i v i t y of t h i s m e t h o d w a s b e t w e e n 0.1 a n d 1.0 ftgram f o r D D A a n d m a l a t h i o n . D D T c o u l d n o t b e d e t e c t e d i n this m a n n e r . Neither D D T , D D A , nor malathion could be detected b y direct reaction i n t h e p r e c i p i t i n or t a n n e d c e l l h e m a g g l u t i n a t i o n tests.

T h e antibodies

p r o d u c e d against t h e v a r i o u s conjugates w e r e specific f o r t h e p a r t i c u l a r p r o t e i n c a r r i e r since the i m m u n e s e r u m f r o m r a b b i t s i n o c u l a t e d w i t h D D A - f i b r i n o g e n d i d not a g g l u t i n a t e t h e D D A - r a b b i t s e r u m a l b u m i n c o n jugate a n d v i c e versa. A n t i h a p t e n a n t i b o d i e s a p p e a r e d to b e t r a n s i t o r y . M a x i m u m titer was obtained approximately 6 weeks

after t h e

initial

i n o c u l a t i o n a n d n o r e a c t i o n w a s d e t e c t a b l e 3 w e e k s later. T h e h a p t e n i c antisera w e r e u n s t a b l e after a f e w days of storage at 4 ° o r — 1 0 ° C .

The

a n t i b o d y a c t i v i t y a p p e a r e d to b e m a i n t a i n e d i f the a n t i s e r a w e r e

first

f r o z e n w i t h d r y i c e a n d stored at — 30 ° C . P r i o r to l e a r n i n g a b o u t t h e a f o r e m e n t i o n e d g r o u p s ' efforts i n v e s t i g a tions w e r e b e g u n i n the a u t h o r s l a b o r a t o r y t o test t h e usefulness

of

i m m u n o l o g i c a l m e t h o d s f o r d e t e c t i n g a n d a n a l y z i n g pesticides a n d p e s t i c i d a l d e g r a d a t i o n p r o d u c t s i n b i o l o g i c a l specimens. these studies c a n b e p r e s e n t e d h e r e since o u r

O n l y a s u m m a r y of

findings

are

considered

p r e l i m i n a r y a n d specific details w i l l b e p u b l i s h e d s u b s e q u e n t l y elsewhere. U n l i k e the other w o r k e r s w h o selected c o m p o u n d s

possessing

car-

b o n y l g r o u p s for c o u p l i n g purposes to t h e p r o t e i n carriers, o u r i n v e s t i g a tions c e n t e r e d o n p e s t i c i d e c o m p o u n d s

w h i c h possess either a n a m i n e

group or a nitro group, w h i c h can be reduced readily to an amine. included

the h e r b i c i d e

pesticide

degradation

aminotriazole, the

products

insecticide

These

parathion, and

nitrophenol, 4-chloronitrotoluene,

and

a n i l i n e . H a p t e n — p r o t e i n conjugates o f a l l of these m a t e r i a l s w e r e r e a d i l y p r e p a r e d b y m o d i f y i n g s l i g h t l y the m e t h o d d e s c r i b e d b y W i l l i a m s a n d C h a s e (12).

A n u n s u c c e s s f u l a t t e m p t to use e g g a l b u m i n as t h e c a r r i e r

p r o t e i n l e d to t h e use of b o v i n e p l a s m a p r o t e i n . T h e s e c a r r i e r p r o t e i n s w e r e u n s a t i s f a c t o r y b e c a u s e t h e y l a c k e d specificity a n d l o w titer f o r m a t i o n i n the a n t i s e r u m . T h e h i g h degree of heterogenous

antibody pro-

d u c t i o n c r e a t e d p r o b l e m s of cross r e a c t i o n w h i c h c o u l d not b e adequately through antiserum-antigen adsorption techniques. the u n d e s i r a b l e results w i t h these t w o p r o t e i n carriers, b o v i n e

corrected Following fibrinogen

f r a c t i o n I w a s tested f o r this p u r p o s e at t h e suggestion of H a a s ( p e r s o n a l communication)

(19).

T h e first results o b t a i n e d f r o m tests u s i n g

fibrino-

g e n as t h e p r o t e i n c a r r i e r r e v e a l e d a h i g h degree of specificity t o w a r d the homologous azoprotein

antigens.

T h i s specificity w a s

somewhat

greater, h o w e v e r , d u r i n g t h e first hours of i n c u b a t i o n a n d decreased as a

170

PESTICIDES

IDENTIFICATION

f u n c t i o n of t i m e w i t h a l i m i t i n g v a l u e of a p p r o x i m a t e l y 24 h o u r s . V e r y l i t t l e , i f a n y , cross-reactions w e r e o b s e r v e d i n t h e e a r l y h o u r s o f i n c u b a t i o n , b u t heterogenous p r e c i p i t a t e s b e g a n to f o r m after a b o u t e i g h t hours of i n c u b a t i o n of t h e p r e c i p i t i n tests. w i t h the v a r i o u s h a p t e n

fibrinogen

I n a second i m m u n i z a t i o n trial

a z o p r o t e i n s , s o m e w h a t h i g h e r titers

of antisera w e r e p r o d u c e d b u t w i t h a greater loss of specificity as e v i d e n c e d f r o m the d e c r e a s e d l e n g t h of t i m e i n v o l v e d for to

cross-reactions

develop. I n a t h i r d a t t e m p t to use

fibrinogen

as the c a r r i e r p r o t e i n a different

i m m u n i z a t i o n s c h e d u l e w a s f o l l o w e d . W h e r e a s i n the earlier experiments the animals, N e w Zealand male a n d female rabbits, were b l e d for antis e r u m r e c o v e r y f o u r days after the last of seven injections, i n t e r v a l s of t w o days after t h e last i n j e c t i o n of t h e h a p t e n - p r o t e i n conjugates, w e r e tried.

R e - i m m u n i z a t i o n of the r a b b i t s w a s r e p e a t e d 30 days a f t e r w a r d s

i n s t e a d of the f o r m e r s i x - d a y i n t e r v a l .

A n t i s e r a of h i g h e r t i t e r

were

p r o d u c e d i n a l l cases, h o w e v e r , the shorter p e r i o d of i m m u n i z a t i o n d i d not p r e v e n t t h e p r o d u c t i o n of

r e l a t i v e l y h i g h titers of

heterogenous

a n t i b o d i e s as e v i d e n c e d b y the h i g h degree of cross reactions. I n a d d i t i o n to the l a c k of specificity a n d cross-reactions w i t h t h e

fibrinogen

conjugates this p r o t e i n w a s less d e s i r a b l e because of t h e d i f f i c u l t y exp e r i e n c e d i n the p r e p a r a t i o n of w o r k solutions of its h a p t e n - a z o p r o t e i n conjugates.

T o dissolve s u c h a z o p r o t e i n s a s o l u t i o n of 8 M u r e a a n d

sodium hydroxide was used.

U r e a , a m i l d d e n a t u r i n g agent, d i s r u p t s

the s e c o n d a r y structure of p r o t e i n s b y c a u s i n g the p r o t e i n c h a i n to b e c o m e stretched, thus e x p o s i n g a n e x t r e m e l y large n u m b e r of a n t i g e n i c sites.

possible

O n c e injected into a n animal such chains apparently

are easily d e g r a d e d i n t o s m a l l e r fragments w h i c h are also c a p a b l e inducing antibody formation.

This phenomenon

m a y explain the lack

of specificity a n d h i g h p r o d u c t i o n of heterogenous antisera as d e m o n s t r a t e d b y p r e c i p i t i n tests.

of

antibodies i n our

It is v i r t u a l l y i m p o s s i b l e

to r e m o v e these i n t e r f e r r i n g heterogenous a n t i b o d i e s f r o m t h e a n t i s e r u m b y a d s o r p t i o n t e c h n i q u e s w i t h a n t i g e n since the r e s p o n s i b l e w e r e f o r m e d in vivo azoprotein.

antigens

o w i n g to d e g r a d a t i o n of the o r i g i n a l l y i n j e c t e d

Adsorption with

fibrinogen

alone

removed

f r a c t i o n of the o v e r a l l i n t e r f e r r i n g heterogenous

only a

small

antibodies.

B o v i n e s e r u m a l b u m i n p r o v e d to b e a m u c h better p r o t e i n c a r r i e r of t h e haptens u s e d i n o u r i n v e s t i g a t i o n . T h i s p r o t e i n w a s also u s e d b y C e n t e n o et al. (17)

w h o s e p r o d u c t i o n of a n t i s e r a to the D D A - B S A a n d

m a l a t h i o n - B S A conjugates is d i s c u s s e d i n p r e c e d i n g p a r a g r a p h s . B o v i n e s e r u m a l b u m i n is r e l a t i v e l y s m a l l e r i n m o l e c u l a r size t h a n

fibrinogen.

T h e a z o p r o t e i n conjugates p r o d u c e d w i t h i t c a n b e s o l u b i l i z e d b y less erratic p r o c e d u r e s w h i c h cause less s t r u c t u r a l alterations of t h e c a r r i e r p r o t e i n , therefore

producing fewer

heterogenous

antibodies.

The

ex-

11.

ERCEGOVICH

Immunological

171

Techniques

traneous a n t i b o d i e s w h i c h d o o c c u r w h e n b o v i n e s e r u m a l b u m i n is u s e d as t h e h a p t e n c a r r i e r is r e m o v e d r e a d i l y f r o m the a n t i s e r u m b y a d s o r p t i o n w i t h the unconjugated protein. A digest of the l i m i t e d a m o u n t of i n f o r m a t i o n a v a i l a b l e a b o u t the subject causes this r e v i e w e r to b e s o m e w h a t o p t i m i s t i c a b o u t t h e p o t e n t i a l usefulness of i m m u n o l o g i c a l m e t h o d s f o r t h e analysis of pesticides. E x periences g a i n e d f r o m i n v e s t i g a t i o n s c o n d u c t e d i n o u r l a b o r a t o r y r e v e a l that m e t h o d o l o g y exists w h i c h c a n b e u s e d t o i m p l e m e n t t h e d e v e l o p m e n t of i m m u n o l o g i c a l p r o c e d u r e s for p e s t i c i d e analysis. T h e three who

are k n o w n to h a v e tested i m m u n o l o g i c a l m e t h o d s

for

groups

detecting

pesticides w e r e a l l successful i n d e v e l o p i n g antisera f o r s o m e v e r y c o m m o n pesticides a n d t h e i r d e g r a d a t i o n p r o d u c t s .

Two

of

the

groups

d e m o n s t r a t e d t h a t i t w a s p o s s i b l e to detect s u b m i c r o g r a m q u a n t i t i e s o f these c h e m i c a l s . T h e same w o r k e r s h a v e s h o w n t h a t w h i l e i t m a y not b e p o s s i b l e to detect these pesticides b y d i r e c t s e r o l o g i c a l tests—e.g., p r e cipitin a n d hemagglutination reactions—these chemicals can be detected i n t r a c e a m o u n t s b y i n d i r e c t s e r o l o g i c a l tests w h i c h are r e l a t i v e l y s i m p l e to c o n d u c t .

T w o of the m o s t u s e f u l i n d i r e c t m e t h o d s w h i c h c a n b e u s e d

to detect the u n c o n j u g a t e d f o r m of the pesticides are t h e h a p t e n i n h i b i t i o n of p r e c i p i t a t i o n a n d passive h e m a g g l u t i n a t i o n i n h i b i t i o n test. T h e p r i n c i p l e of h a p t e n i n h i b i t i o n i n v o l v e s the r e a c t i o n of a n a n t i b o d y w i t h free h a p t e n a n d o b s e r v i n g a decrease i n the p r e c i p i t a t i o n of the a n t i b o d y w i t h the a d d i t i o n of t h e a p p r o p r i a t e antigen—i.e., the h a p t e n c o n j u g a t e d precipitating protein.

T h e a m o u n t of p r e c i p i t a t i o n is d i r e c t l y p r o p o r -

t i o n a l to the a m o u n t of h a p t e n present to c o m p e t e for a c t i v e sites o n t h e a n t i b o d y . T h e h a p t e n i n h i b i t i o n of p r e c i p i t a t i o n m e t h o d is m o r e specific t h a n the passive h e m a g g l u t i n a t i o n i n h i b i t i o n m e t h o d b u t is less a d a p t a b l e for r e l i a b l e q u a n t i t a t i v e d a t a .

Prognosis for the Future Use of Immunological Methods for Pesticide Analysis T h e p e s t i c i d e c h e m i s t w i l l q u e s t i o n w h a t the p r a c t i c a l a p p l i c a t i o n s of i m m u n o l o g i c a l t e c h n i q u e s for r e s i d u e analysis of pesticides are.

He

w i l l b e c o n c e r n e d a b o u t the specificity, q u a n t i t a t i v e aspects, a n d a d v a n tages these t e c h n i q u e s h a v e o v e r the e x i s t i n g c o l o r i m e t r i c , c h r o m a t o g r a p h i c , s p e c t r o p h o t o m e t r i c , a n d bioassay m e t h o d s w h i c h w o r k for h i m . B e c a u s e of t h e stringent r e q u i r e m e n t s to amass a l l of t h e

necessary

t o x i c o l o g i c a l a n d r e s i d u e d a t a n e e d e d to o b t a i n r e g i s t r a t i o n for the sale of a p e s t i c i d e , one of the first objectives of a w o u l d - b e p r o d u c e r is to d e v e l o p r e l i a b l e m e t h o d s to a n a l y z e his p r o d u c t .

F o r this reason there

exist a d e q u a t e m e t h o d s for a n a l y z i n g f o o d p r o d u c t s , c o m p o n e n t s of t h e e n v i r o n m e n t , a n d p a t h o l o g i c a l specimens for specific pesticides a n d t h e i r

172

PESTICIDES

degradation products.

IDENTIFICATION

T h e s e m e t h o d s , h o w e v e r g o o d t h e y are f o r a n a -

l y z i n g specific c o m p o u n d s , are not a d e q u a t e to a n a l y z e efficiently a n d m e a n i n g f u l l y the g e n e r a l f o o d s u p p l y , a n d a l l of the other samples of c o n c e r n , f o r the c o m p r e h e n s i v e q u a l i t a t i v e a n d q u a n t i t a t i v e i n f o r m a t i o n w h i c h is d e s i r e d a b o u t the pesticides t h a t m a y b e present. P e s t i c i d e laboratories of f o o d i n d u s t r i e s a n d r e g u l a t o r y agencies are c o n t i n u a l l y f a c e d w i t h the p r o b l e m of a n a l y z i n g samples w h o s e h i s t o r y of exposure to pesticides is u n k n o w n . M o r e t h a n one p e s t i c i d e m a y b e present i n a n y of these samples a n d the r e s i d u e of e a c h m a y h a v e to b e determined.

T o h e l p solve t h i s p r o b l e m of a n a l y z i n g d i v e r s e s a m p l e

types f o r exposure to different types of pesticides, effort has b e e n m a d e b y t h e F D A scientists, a m o n g others, to d e v e l o p m e t h o d s for the m u l t i p l e analysis of pesticides. T h e subject of m e t h o d s f o r the m u l t i p l e analysis of pesticides has been adequately reviewed recently b y B u r k e (20).

A c c o r d i n g to B u r k e ,

h o w e v e r , a definite p r o c e d u r e f o r c o n f i r m i n g the i d e n t i t y of a g i v e n p e s t i c i d e r e s i d u e has n o t b e e n established. T h i n - l a y e r c h r o m a t o g r a p h y , gas c h r o m a t o g r a p h y o n c o l u m n s that g i v e different r e t e n t i o n patterns, a n d t h e p-values of B o w m a n a n d B e r o z a (21, 22)

are p r o b a b l y t h e m o s t

universally applicable confirmatory techniques.

D e r i v a t i z a t i o n of

the

r e s i d u e i n q u e s t i o n f o l l o w e d b y gas c h r o m a t o g r a p h y of the d e r i v a t i v e seems a n excellent a p p r o a c h , a n d s e v e r a l p r o c e d u r e s are d e s c r i b e d i n t h e recent l i t e r a t u r e (23, 24).

M u l t i r e s i d u e m e t h o d s h a v e a serious l i m -

i t a t i o n since m a n y p e s t i c i d e c h e m i c a l s are not d e t e r m i n e d a n d n o t a l l s a m p l e types c a n b e h a n d l e d i n a r o u t i n e f a s h i o n . A l s o , as p r e v i o u s l y m e n t i o n e d , there is n o c o m p l e t e s c h e m e f o r c o n f i r m i n g the i d e n t i t y of m a n y pesticides. T h e s e l e c t i o n of m e t h o d s of a n a l y s i s , therefore, d e p e n d s e x t e n s i v e l y u p o n the pesticides a n d n a t u r e of the s a m p l e to b e a n a l y z e d , t h e e q u i p m e n t a n d p e r s o n n e l r e q u i r e d , a n d the s i m p l i c i t y , speed, cost, a c c u r a c y , a n d r e p r o d u c i b i l i t y of the m e t h o d .

T i m e frequently plays a

p r e d o m i n a n t r o l e i n t h e selection of m e t h o d s to b e u s e d b y t h e f o o d processor,

who

must comply

to p e s t i c i d e

tolerances,

and regulatory

agencies, w h o m u s t enforce t h e m . A p p a r e n t l y , a c o m b i n a t i o n of s c r e e n i n g a n d specific m e t h o d s is n e e d e d b y s u c h o r g a n i z a t i o n s since n e i t h e r types of m e t h o d s alone c a n satisfy t h e i r a n a l y t i c a l r e q u i r e m e n t s . S o m e t e c h n i q u e s m a y offer selective s c r e e n i n g as w e l l as specificity —e.g., m i c r o c o u l o m e t r i c m e t h o d s d e s c r i b e d b y C o u l s o n et al. (24).

This

t e c h n i q u e consists of a c o m b i n a t i o n of gas c h r o m a t o g r a p h y , c o m b u s t i o n , a n d continuous coulometric titration for chlorine or sulfur. T h e developm e n t of the flame p h o t o m e t r i c detector offers a s i m i l a r p o t e n t i a l f o r t h e selective s c r e e n i n g a n d s p e c i f i c i t y of pesticides w h i c h c o n t a i n p h o s p h o r u s o r s u l f u r (25).

E v e n so, o n e o r m o r e tests i n a d d i t i o n to the i n i t i a l

11.

ERCEGOVICH

Immunological

173

Techniques

analysis m a y b e r e q u i r e d to i d e n t i f y p r o p e r l y the pesticides present i n a sample. A c r i t i c a l e v a l u a t i o n of the l i m i t e d a m o u n t of i n f o r m a t i o n a v a i l a b l e a b o u t the d e t e c t i o n of pesticides b y i m m u n o l o g i c a l m e t h o d s enables one, w i t h o u t too m u c h o p t i m i s m , to r e p l y i n the affirmative to t h e r e s i d u e chemist's q u e s t i o n r e g a r d i n g specificity. B o t h C e n t e n o et ah a n d H a a s a n d G u a r d i a w e r e successful i n p r o d u c i n g a n t i s e r a w h i c h w e r e specific f o r d e r i v a t i v e s of D D T a n d m a l a t h i o n , D D A a n d m a l a t h i o n esters, r e spectively.

A n t i s e r a w h i c h w e r e specific f o r p a r a t h i o n , a m i n o t r i a z o l e ,

p-nitrophenol

(a

degradation product

of

parathion), and

n i t r o t o l u e n e h a v e b e e n p r o d u c e d i n the a u t h o r s l a b o r a t o r y .

4-chloro-2The pro-

d u c t i o n o f these antisera w a s a c c o m p l i s h e d b y c o n v e n t i o n a l i m m u n o l o g i c a l techniques.

C o n f i r m a t i o n of these a n t i b o d i e s w a s r e a d i l y d e m o n s t r a t e d

b y w e l l k n o w n serological methods. T h e relation between

a n t i g e n a n d a n t i b o d y is h i g h l y specific, as

i n d i c a t e d . I n a sense the s e r o l o g i c a l methods u s e d to demonstrate a n t i g e n a n t i b o d y reactions are a n a l y t i c a l m e t h o d s , sensitive, s e m i - q u a n t i t a t i v e , a n d h i g h l y specific. l o g i c a l specificity.

T h e r e is a l i m i t , h o w e v e r , to the p r e c i s i o n of seroW h e n different h o m o l o g o u s antigens are u s e d

to

i m m u n i z e a n i m a l s , the a n t i b o d i e s f o r one a n t i g e n react also w i t h o t h e r antigens, t h o u g h less strongly. T h e s e are c a l l e d cross-reactions.

Saying

t h a t a n a n t i b o d y is specific f o r a p a r t i c u l a r a n t i g e n is a r e l a t i v e t e r m because i t is b a s e d o n t h e degree to w h i c h a n a n t i b o d y reacts w i t h v a r i o u s antigens, not r e q u i r i n g i t to react solely w i t h o n l y one of t h e m . It is also r e l a t i v e because t h e a n t i b o d y m a y not h a v e b e e n tested against a l l p o s s i b l e antigens; thus there c o u l d b e others w i t h w h i c h i t m i g h t react. A n t i s e r u m to a n a z o p r o t e i n or to other types of c o n j u g a t e d p r o t e i n is p r o d u c e d p r i m a r i l y to o b t a i n a n t i b o d i e s against k n o w n structures. F o r some u n k n o w n reason h a p t e n i c groups are n o t v e r y i m m u n o g e n i c , r e gardless of t h e p r o t e i n c a r r i e r , a n d a n t i s e r u m u s u a l l y contains a r e l a t i v e l y l o w c o n c e n t r a t i o n of a n t i b o d y against the c o n j u g a t e d h a p t e n . I n w o r k i n g w i t h c o n j u g a t e d p r o t e i n s it s h o u l d b e r e m e m b e r e d that a n t i b o d i e s p r o d u c e d to i t m a y e x h i b i t three types of s p e c i f i c i t y : one d i r e c t e d t o w a r d the h a p t e n , one t o w a r d the p r o t e i n c a r r i e r , a n d one t o w a r d the h a p t e n p r o t e i n conjugate.

A s a r u l e a n a n t i s e r u m against a g i v e n

p r o t e i n contains a d i v e r s i t y of a n t i b o d i e s .

conjugated

B e c a u s e of this m i x t u r e of

a n t i b o d y m o l e c u l e s , a s e r o l o g i c a l test for h a p t e n a n t i b o d y m u s t b e m a d e w i t h t h e h a p t e n a t t a c h e d to t h e p r o t e i n m o l e c u l e h a v i n g n o cross-reaction w i t h the one u s e d f o r i m m u n i z a t i o n . T h e i n t e r f e r r i n g a n t i b o d i e s , w h i c h g i v e rise to cross-reactions, h o w e v e r , are r e m o v e d f r o m a n t i s e r u m b y a process k n o w n as a d s o r p t i o n . T h i s process i n v o l v e s i n c u b a t i n g t h e a n t i s e r u m w i t h respective antigens w h i c h are r e q u i r e d to react w i t h the extraneous a n t i b o d i e s .

T h e resulting a n t i g e n - a n t i b o d y complexes can

174

PESTICIDES

IDENTIFICATION

then be removed by centrifugation, leaving a specificity-enriched antiserum. T h e e x p l o r a t o r y investigations w h i c h h a v e b e e n

conducted

using

i m m u n o l o g i c a l a n d s e r o l o g i c a l t e c h n i q u e s to a n a l y z e pesticides h a v e b e e n r e s t r i c t e d to a t y p i c a l s a m p l e c o n d i t i o n s .

T h r o u g h t h e use of t a n n e d c e l l

h e m a g g l u t i n a t i o n i n h i b i t i o n tests, H a a s a n d G u a r d i a c o u l d detect q u a n tities of 0.1 a n d 1.0 /mgram of D D A a n d m a l a t h i o n . H o w e v e r , b y this same t e c h n i q u e t h e y w e r e u n a b l e to detect D D T w i t h the a n t i s e r u m w h i c h w a s p r o d u c e d i n response to i m m u n i z a t i o n w i t h D D A - f i b r i n o g e n . These

findings

are significant because t h e y demonstrate specificity for

one of the m a j o r d e g r a d a t i o n p r o d u c t s of D D T a n d t h a t s u c h p r o c e d u r e s c a n detect m i c r o g r a m q u a n t i t i e s of t w o i m p o r t a n t p e s t i c i d a l l y r e l a t e d c h e m i c a l s . It is of interest to a t t e m p t to conjugate D D T itself to a c a r r i e r p r o t e i n b y m a k i n g a n arsenate d e r i v a t i v e of i t , or a c o m p o u n d

more

closely r e l a t e d s t r u c t u r a l l y to D D T t h a n D D A . S u c h a c o m p o u n d w o u l d be Kelthane, [ l , l - b i s ( p-chlorophenyl )-2,2,2-trichloroethanol]. P r e l i m i n a r y trials u s i n g a s i m i l a r t y p e of passive h e m a g g l u t i n a t i o n techniques

enabled Babish (personal communication)

to

(26)

detect

12 n g r a m s of p a r a t h i o n a n d 150 n g r a m s of a m i n o t r i a z o l e . N e i t h e r g r o u p of w o r k e r s , h o w e v e r , a t t e m p t e d to detect a n y of these c o m p o u n d s

in

c r u d e or f o r t i f i e d extracts of s o i l , p l a n t , or a n i m a l tissue. T h e r e f o r e , t h e q u e s t i o n a b o u t the s u i t a b i l i t y a n d effectiveness

of d e t e c t i n g residues of

these pesticides i n a c t u a l samples r e m a i n s to b e a n s w e r e d . these

findings

Nonetheless,

suggest t h a t a c o m b i n a t i o n of i m m u n o l o g i c a l a n d

sero-

l o g i c a l t e c h n i q u e s h a v e the p o t e n t i a l of q u a n t i t a t i o n t h a t the r e s i d u e c h e m i s t r e q u i r e s a n d s h o u l d b e e x a m i n e d m o r e seriously f o r

pesticide

r e s i d u e analysis. T h e r e are a n u m b e r of o b v i o u s advantages to the use of i m m u n o l o g i c a l t e c h n i q u e s for p e s t i c i d e analysis, b u t the converse is also t r u e . N o inference is m a d e

that s u c h t e c h n i q u e s

c o u l d ever r e p l a c e t h e

s o p h i s t i c a t e d m e t h o d s of analysis p r e s e n t l y b e i n g u s e d . gested

t h a t t h e y h a v e p o t e n t i a l to s u p p l e m e n t

more

It is o n l y s u g -

rather than supplant

e x i s t i n g m e t h o d s of analysis. T h e i r greatest usefulness is for the r a p i d screening of a large n u m b e r of samples for the presence of specific types of pesticides or t h r e s h o l d q u a n t i t i e s . T h e s e m e t h o d s are also i d e a l for c o n f i r m a t o r y tests.

T h r o u g h t h e use of p r o p e r m e t h o d s

degree of specificity for v a r i o u s c o m p o u n d s oped. R

f

a very high

could ultimately be devel-

S u c h c o n f i r m a t o r y tests w o u l d b e i n d e p e n d e n t of r e l i a n c e u p o n

values, r e t e n t i o n times, a n d other h i g h l y e m p i r i c a l indexes p r e s e n t l y

u s e d i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h gas, l i q u i d , a n d t h i n l a y e r

chromatography.

P e r h a p s one of the greatest potentials for i m m u n o l o g i c a l m e t h o d s p e s t i c i d e r e s i d u e analysis is t h e i r use i n d e v e l o p i n g countries.

for

Because

n o h i g h l y s p e c i a l i z e d or expensive e q u i p m e n t is r e q u i r e d , e x c e p t f o r a

11.

ERCEGOVICH

Immunological

175

Techniques

s u i t a b l e centrifuge. P e r s o n n e l r e q u i r e m e n t s w o u l d n o t b e c r i t i c a l , except for a senior m e m b e r w h o has the p r o p e r t r a i n i n g a n d u n d e r s t a n d i n g of immunological methods.

T h e o p e r a t i n g t e c h n i c i a n s w o u l d not h a v e to

b e h i g h l y s k i l l e d i n electronics a n d other d i s c i p l i n e s w h i c h are r e q u i r e d for

the p r o p e r

operation

of

gas

chromatographic

and

spectrometric

equipment. The

o v e r a l l advantages

of

i m m u n o l o g i c a l methods

for

pesticide

analysis are t h a t t h e y c a n b e p e r f o r m e d r e l a t i v e l y fast, e c o n o m i c a l l y , a n d s i m p l y w i t h a h i g h degree of a c c u r a c y a n d r e p r o d u c i b i l i t y . S i n c e

no

h i g h cost elaborate e q u i p m e n t is r e q u i r e d , there w o u l d b e n o great i n i t i a l i n v e s t m e n t , subsequent

replacement,

a n d s e r v i c i n g costs.

Technician

r e q u i r e m e n t s i n t r a i n i n g a n d s p e c i a l i z a t i o n w o u l d b e m i n i m a l as w e l l as the n u m b e r of p e r s o n n e l n e e d e d . I n c o m p a r i s o n w i t h t h e 20 to 40 analyses w h i c h a t e c h n i c i a n c a n p e r f o r m o n one gas c h r o m a t o g r a p h d u r i n g a n e i g h t - h o u r w o r k d a y his p r o d u c t i v i t y w i t h s e r o l o g i c a l m e t h o d s c o u l d b e increased many-fold. E v e n t h o u g h the p r o b l e m s o f p r o d u c i n g h i g h l y specific a n t i s e r a c a n b e o v e r c o m e , these m e t h o d s m a y s t i l l h a v e c e r t a i n disadvantages.

The

foremost d i s a d v a n t a g e concerns the source a n d a v a i l a b i l i t y of the respect i v e a n t i b o d i e s w h i c h w o u l d b e n e e d e d f o r analysis. T h i s p r o b l e m is not i n s u r m o u n t a b l e f o r i t is not e x p e c t e d

t h a t e a c h l a b o r a t o r y w i s h i n g to

use s u c h t e c h n i q u e s w o u l d p r o d u c e its o w n a n t i s e r a , except i n those f e w cases i n w h i c h the v o l u m e a n d t y p e of o p e r a t i o n w o u l d j u s t i f y d o i n g so. If a n d w h e n i m m u n o l o g i c a l t e c h n i q u e s are p r o v e d r e l i a b l e a n d w o r t h y for the r o u t i n e analysis of p e s t i c i d e residues, one w o u l d expect t h a t specific antisera w o u l d e v e n t u a l l y b e c o m e a v a i l a b l e f r o m

commercial

sources as is n o w t r u e for a w i d e v a r i e t y of antisera. O n e s u p p l i e r of antisera p r e s e n t l y fists a n u m b e r of antisera of the n a t u r e d i s c u s s e d i n this c h a p t e r f o r t h e f o l l o w i n g h a p t e n s : 3-indoleacetic a c i d , d i n i t r o p h e n o l , azobenzenearsonate,

acid, gibberellic

thymidine, and uridine. E v e n

i n the l o w q u a n t i t y i n w h i c h these antisera m u s t b e p r o d u c e d , o w i n g to t h e i r v e r y l i m i t e d use, t h e i r cost is c o m p e t i t i v e w i t h present

methods

of analysis.

Greater

M o s t of these antisera are p r o d u c e d

i n rabbits.

q u a n t i t i e s at s u b s t a n t i a l l y l o w e r prices c o u l d e a s i l y b e p r o d u c e d to m e e t h i g h v o l u m e d e m a n d b y u s i n g l a r g e r a n i m a l s s u c h as goats, cattle, a n d horses.

O n e m i g h t also expect that the c o m m e r c i a l s u p p l i e r of antisera

w o u l d also s u p p l y i d e n t i f i c a t i o n kits w h i c h c o n t a i n b o t h the

specific

a n t i g e n a n d specific a n t i b o d y as controls a n d f o r p o s i t i v e i d e n t i f i c a t i o n . A n t i s e r a m a y b e h i g h l y p e r i s h a b l e substances i n c o m p a r i s o n

with

the c h e m i c a l s a n d solvents n o r m a l l y u s e d b y the p e s t i c i d e chemist. H a a s and

G u a r d i a suggested

that a p r o b l e m existed i n this respect.

Their

p r e l i m i n a r y results s h o w e d t h a t t h e a n t i s e r u m to D D A - f i b r i n o g e n a n d m a l a t h i o n - f i b r i n o g e n c o u l d b e p r e s e r v e d u p to o n e m o n t h i f f r o z e n w i t h

176

PESTICIDES

IDENTIFICATION

d r y i c e a n d k e p t at — 3 0 ° C . M o r e w o r k o n the s t a b i l i t y of s u c h a n t i b o d i e s w o u l d h a v e to b e c o n d u c t e d , h o w e v e r , b e f o r e g e n e r a l i z a t i o n s a b o u t t h e i r shelf l i f e c a n b e m a d e .

S u p p l i e r s of a n u m b e r of antisera c l a i m shelf

lives of u p to o n e y e a r i f t h e p r o d u c t is m a i n t a i n e d u n d e r t h e r e c o m m e n d e d storage c o n d i t i o n s . T h e d i s a d v a n t a g e i n t h i s respect m a y a m o u n t m o s t l y to a m a t t e r of m o r e c r i t i c a l p l a n n i n g i n regards to needs a n d inventory. I m m u n o l o g i c a l m e t h o d s w o u l d not h a v e the q u a n t i t a t i v e p r e c i s i o n of

gas c h r o m a t o g r a p h i c ,

c o l o r i m e t r i c , or s p e c t r o p h o t o m e t r i c

methods.

However, i n their proper manipulation they can provide semiquantitative data comparable w i t h that obtained b y t h i n layer chromatography.

The

q u a l i t a t i v e i n f o r m a t i o n d e r i v e d f r o m i m m u n o l o g i c a l m e t h o d s w o u l d not necessarily b e a b s o l u t e b u t c e r t a i n l y w o u l d b e m o r e r e l i a b l e t h a n s u c h information based

on retention time a n d R

f

values.

The qualitative

aspects of i m m u n o l o g i c a l m e t h o d s w i l l d e p e n d u p o n specificity, w h i c h w i l l b e i n f l u e n c e d b y the q u a l i t y of the a n t i s e r u m a n d the n a t u r e of t h e antigen (the residue sample).

I n this r e g a r d t h e q u e s t i o n a b o u t s a m p l e

p r e p a r a t i o n a n d c l e a n u p arises. U n f o r t u n a t e l y , d e t a i l e d studies i n this c o n n e c t i o n h a v e not b e e n

conducted.

O n e reason for d e f e r r i n g s u c h

studies i n preference to w o r k i n g w i t h p u r e solutions has b e e n to establ i s h t h e f e a s i b i l i t y of s u c h m e t h o d s a n d t h a t o n a t h e o r e t i c a l basis one expects a lesser d e g r e e of i n t e r f e r e n c e w i t h s e r o l o g i c a l m e t h o d s

than

w i t h m o r e c o n v e n t i o n a l m e t h o d s of analysis. T h e structures of m o s t of the p e s t i c i d a l c o m p o u n d s

differ so g r e a t l y f r o m the n o r m a l constituents

of p l a n t , s o i l , a n d a n i m a l tissues t h a t i t w o u l d b e u n l i k e l y to e x p e c t m a n y of these substances to fit the steric r e q u i r e m e n t s of h i g h l y p u r i f i e d a n d specific a n t i s e r u m . A t most one w o u l d expect t h a t c l e a n u p u s e d f o r gas a n d t h i n l a y e r c h r o m a t o g r a p h y

w o u l d be

procedures

sufficient

for

s e r o l o g i c a l d e t e c t i o n . H o w e v e r , i f l i t t l e or n o c l e a n u p at a l l w o u l d suffice, the p r o d u c t i v i t y p e r t e c h n i c i a n w o u l d b e greater. A c e r t a i n a m o u n t of s p e c i a l i z e d t r a i n i n g w i l l b e r e q u i r e d f o r other m e t h o d s of analysis. P r o p e r u n d e r s t a n d i n g of i m m u n o l o g y a n d serology w o u l d b e r e q u i r e d of t h e senior i n v e s t i g a t o r to i n t e r p r e t the results p r o p e r l y , b u t this r e q u i r e m e n t is n o m o r e of a n i m p o s i t i o n or deterrent f o r these t e c h n i q u e s t h a n i t is for other m e t h o d s of analysis.

Literature Cited (1) (2) (3)

Burrows, W . , Moulder, J. W., Lewert, R. M., "Testbook of Microbiology," 18th ed., W . B . Saunders, Philadelphia, 1965. D a y , E . D . , "Foundations of Immunochemistry," W i l l i a m s & W i l k i n s , Baltimore, 1966. Gary, D . F . , "Immunology," 2 n d ed., Cheshire, Melbourne, Australia, 1970.

11.

ERCEGOVICH

Immunological

Techniques

177

(4) Weiser, R. S., Myrvik, Q. N . , Pearsall, N . N . , "Fundamentals of Immunology," Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, 1970. (5) Lansteiner, K., " T h e Specificity of Serological Reactions," Dover, New York, 1962. (6) Nezlin, R. S., "Biochemistry of Antibodies," Plenum Press, New York, 1970. (7) Pressman, D . , Grossberg, A . L . , "The Structural Basis of Antibody Specificity," New York, 1968. (8) Campbell, H . , Garvey, J. S., Cremer, N . E., Sussdorf, D . H . , "Methods in Immunology," W . A . Benjamin, New York, 1964. (9) Kabat, E . A . , Mayer, M . , "Experimental Immunochemistry," Charles Thomas, Springfield, 1966. (10) Kwapinski, J. B., "Methods in Serological Research," Wiley & Sons, New York, 1965. (11) Nowotny, A . , "Basic Exercises in Immunochemistry," Springer-Verlag, New York, 1969. (12) Williams, C. A . , Chase, M . W., "Methods in Immunology and Immunochemistry," Academic Press, New York, 1967. (13) Mattioli, C. A., Yazi, A . , Pressman, B., J. Immunol. (1968) 101, 939. (14) Gill, J. T., Boty, P., J. Biol Chem. (1961) 236, 2677. (15) Talano, R. C., Haber, E . , Austen, K. F . , J. Immunol. (1968) 101, 333. (16) Haurowitz, F . J., Immunology (1942) 43, 311. (17) Centeno, E . R., Johnson, W . J., Sehon, A . H . , Int. Arch. Allergy Appl. Immunol. (1970) 37, 1. (18) Haas, G . J., Guardia, E . J., Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. (1968) 129, 546. (19) Haas, G . J., personal communication (1971). (20) Burke, J. A . , Residue Rev. (1971) 34, 59. (21) Beroza, M . , Inscoe, M . N . , Bowman, M . C., Residue Rev. (1969) 30, 1. (22) Bowman, M . C., Beroza, M . , J. Assoc. Offic. Agr. Chem. (1965) 48, 943. (23) Chau, A . S. Y., Cochrane, W . P.,J.Assoc. Offic. Anal. Chem. (1969) 52, 1220. (24) Coulson, D . M . , Cavanagh, L . A., DeVries, J. E., Walther, B., J. Agr. Food Chem. (1960) 8, 399. (25) Brody, S. S., Chaney, J. E., J. Gas Chromatogr. (1966) 4, 42. (26) Babish, J. G., personal communication (1971). RECEIVED

July 16,

1971.

PESTICIDES

IDENTIFICATION