Phenol Groups of

Apr 11, 2019 - Here, we reacted increasing sulfide concentrations with purified model peat at pH 6, forming reduced organic sulfur species, and subseq...
1 downloads 0 Views 3MB Size
Subscriber access provided by Bibliothèque de l'Université Paris-Sud

Environmental Processes

Antimonite complexation with thiol and carboxyl/phenol groups of peat organic matter Johannes Besold, Naresh Kumar, Andreas C Scheinost, Juan S. Lezama-Pacheco, Scott Fendorf, and Britta Planer-Friedrich Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b00495 • Publication Date (Web): 11 Apr 2019 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on April 12, 2019

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 44

Environmental Science & Technology

1

“Antimonite complexation with thiol and

2

carboxyl/phenol groups of peat organic matter”

3

Johannes Besold1, Naresh Kumar2,3, Andreas C. Scheinost4, Juan Lezama Pacheco5, Scott

4

Fendorf5 and Britta Planer-Friedrich*1

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

1

Department of Environmental Geochemistry, Bayreuth Center for Ecology and Environmental Research (BAYCEER), Bayreuth University, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany 2

Department of Geological Sciences, School of Earth, Energy, and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. 3

Department of Environmental Geosciences, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria

4

The Rossendorf Beamline (ROBL) at ESRF, 38043 Grenoble, France and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Institute of Resource Ecology, 01328 Dresden, Germany 5

Department of Earth System Science, School of Earth, Energy, and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 2 of 44

20

ABSTRACT

21

Peatlands and other wetlands with abundant natural organic matter (NOM) are important sinks for

22

antimony (Sb). While formation of Sb(III) sulfide phases or Sb(III) binding to NOM are discussed

23

to decrease Sb mobility, the exact binding mechanisms remain elusive. Here, we reacted increasing

24

sulfide concentrations with purified model peat at pH 6, forming reduced organic sulfur species,

25

and subsequently equilibrated the reaction products with 50 µM antimonite under anoxic

26

conditions. Sulfur solid-phase speciation and the local binding environment of Sb were analyzed

27

using X-ray absorption spectroscopy. We found that 85% of antimonite was sorbed by untreated

28

peat. Sulfide-reacted peat increased sorption to 98%. Shell-by-shell fitting of Sb K-edge X-ray

29

absorption fine structure spectra revealed Sb in untreated peat bound to carboxyl or phenol groups

30

with average Sb-carbon distances of ~2.90 Å. With increasing content of reduced organic sulfur,

31

Sb was progressively coordinated to S atoms at distances of ~2.45 Å and Sb-carbon distances of

32

~3.33 Å, suggesting increasing Sb-thiol binding. Iterative target factor analysis allowed exclusion

33

of reduced inorganic Sb-sulfur phases with similar Sb-sulfur distances. In conclusion, even when

34

free sulfide concentrations are too low for formation of Sb-sulfur precipitates, peat NOM can

35

sequester Sb in anoxic, sulfur-enriched environments.

36 37 38

2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 44

39 40

Environmental Science & Technology

TOC

Sorbed Sb(III) [%]

100

Sb C

S

R 90

Sb O CC

R

80

41 42 43 44 45

Organic S

3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 4 of 44

46

INTRODUCTION

47

Antimony (Sb) is a potentially toxic1-3 metalloid, whose mobility and speciation is strongly

48

influenced by its redox transformations.4,5 Under oxic to slightly reducing conditions, the

49

pentavalent antimonate is the thermodynamically favored species, while the trivalent antimonite is

50

predicted to dominate under anoxic conditions. Antimonate thereby prevails as negatively charged

51

Sb(OH)6− whereas antimonite occurs as neutral oxoacid Sb(OH)3 at environmentally relevant pH

52

values.4

53

In contrast to its group-five neighbor arsenic (As), the biogeochemistry of Sb is relatively poorly

54

studied,6,7 despite pollution due to increased mining activities in the past years8,9 as well as broad

55

industrial (flame retardants, catalyst in plastics synthesis etc.)1,10 and military (ammunition)11 use.

56

The majority of research has been conducted on oxic environments11-14 with special focus on the

57

role of iron and manganese (oxyhydr)oxides as well as clay minerals for the mobility of Sb.5

58

However, there is little information on Sb aqueous- and solid-phase speciation under anoxic, partly

59

sulfidic conditions with high abundances of solid natural organic matter (NOM). Such conditions

60

prevail in peatlands and other wetlands.5,15 While natural antimony background concentrations

61

including values from pristine peatlands for comparison are commonly low (0.008-0.3 mg kg-

62

1 16,17

63

received from mining activities, principally gold17 and Sb12,18-20 mining (with resulting Sb

64

concentrations up to 22,000 mg kg-1).18

)

, high Sb contents have been reported from atmospheric deposition16 and from waste waters

65

Several studies have demonstrated in recent years, particularly for As17,21-23 but also for other

66

(radioactive) toxic trace metal(loid)s,24-28 that natural and engineered peatlands and wetlands can

67

act as important contaminant sinks due to covalent binding to solid NOM. On the other hand,

68

complexation with dissolved or colloidal organic matter could lead to (re)mobilization of 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 44

Environmental Science & Technology

69

metal(loids) in organic-rich surface-, pore-, and groundwaters.29-32 On the basis of current findings,

70

although limited in number, Sb sequestration appears more important in organic carbon-rich

71

environments compared to mobilization because complexation of antimonite with dissolved

72

organic ligands was generally observed to be limited (< 30% of total Sb).33-35

73

In peatlands, iron and manganese (oxyhydr)oxides undergo reductive dissolution with increasing

74

depth due to increasing water content—and eventual saturation36,37; additionally, (microbially

75

triggered) sulfate-reduction leads to formation of dissolved sulfide with depth.38 Released

76

metal(oid)s such as Sb or As can then react with sulfide, forming authigenic amorphous As/Sb-S

77

precipitates at low to neutral pH values.5,39 Despite generally sulfidic conditions, however, free

78

sulfide concentrations in peatlands are commonly low40-43 since the produced sulfide can be

79

effectively incorporated into NOM as organic thiols40,44, often the dominant sulfur species in such

80

systems.45 Precipitation of Sb(III) sulfide phases may therefore play a minor role in peatlands

81

compared to complexation by reduced organic sulfur (thiol) functional groups.

82

The association of Sb with solid NOM has so far only been shown in a few field studies, including

83

studies from peat bogs in Switzerland16 and the United Kindom46-48 where a strong association of

84

atmospheric anthropogenic Sb depositions with NOM was observed. Further, Fawcett et al.20

85

revealed the association of Sb with solid NOM, and the presence of Sb(III)-S phases in aquatic

86

sediments residing adjacent to a former mining site. In a recent study, Arsic et al.49 also reported

87

the formation of an Sb(III)-S phase in contaminated wetland soil mesocosm experiments. They

88

speculated the formation of authigenic Sb(III) sulfide or Sb(III) complexation with thiol functional

89

groups, but were unable to distinguish between them. With organic-rich sediments from the same

90

wetland, Bennett et al.50 showed with bulk extended X-ray absorption fine-structure (EXAFS)

91

spectroscopy that up to 44% of total Sb was 3-fold coordinated to sulfur at a distance of 2.46 Å,

92

indicative for Sb-thiol coordination. Since such a coordination environment is common in both 5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 6 of 44

93

phases, Sb-thiol complexes as well as in disordered SbS3 formed via reaction of antimonite with

94

mackinawite (FeS)51, unequivocal attribution to one of these two Sb species could not be made.

95

The aims of the present work were hence twofold. First, to determine the extent of antimonite

96

sorption and its local binding environment (