pubs.acs.org/JPCL
Photoinduced Electron Transfer in a Prototypical Mulliken Donor-Acceptor Complex: C2H4 3 3 3 Br2 Lisa George, Laura Wittmann, Aimable Kalume, and Scott A. Reid* Department of Chemistry, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201-1881
ABSTRACT We report a new dual nozzle late mixing scheme for the trapping and interrogation of prereactive donor-acceptor complexes that is used initially to examine photoinduced electron transfer in the prototypical Mulliken donoracceptor (halogen-bonded) π-complex, C2H4 3 3 3 Br2. Excitation into the intense charge-transfer band of the complex leads exclusively to the anti conformer of the single reaction product, 1,2-dibromoethane, in agreement with the Mulliken theory of electron transfer. SECTION Dynamics, Clusters, Excited States
charge-transfer band (λmax = 237 nm) is in excellent agreement with theoretical predictions, and we find that excitation at λ > 300 nm does not access this band but rather transitions localized on the Br2 chromophore (Figure 1). The dominance of the radical mechanism in this case is then understood; as illustrated in Scheme 1a, cleavage of the Br-Br bond leads to bromine atom attack on the double bond, forming the bromoethyl radical, which, following our recent report,21 has a classical ground-state structure. Cis or trans addition of the second bromine atom to the radical center, occurring with equal preference, then leads to the anti or gauche conformers of 1,2-dibromoethane. In contrast, charge-transfer excitation should initiate electron transfer,1 Scheme 1b, leading through a bridged bromonium ion intermediate to the anti conformer of the reaction product. This Letter describes the development of a new method for isolation of the complex in high yield and reports initial studies of the charge-transfer photochemistry of this textbook Mulliken complex. Our experiments utilized a dual pulsed nozzle late mixing scheme in combination with matrix isolation, Figure 2a. Apart from the late mixing source, which is similar in design to sources reported for molecular beam studies,22,23 the apparatus used in these experiments has been described in detail in earlier publications.21,24,25 The source utilized two solenoid pulsed valves, which produced 1 ms duration pulses at a variable repetition rate and variable delay, controlled by a pulse/delay generator (SRS DG535). Three different experiments were conducted in an attempt to isolate the C2H4 3 3 3 Br2 complex, and the results are illustrated in Figure 2b, which displays a region of the infrared (IR) spectrum near the ethylene monomer ν12 band (CH2 scissor). The spectral region shown is convenient for monitoring
T
he electron-transfer archetype for chemical reactivity underlies important processes in diverse areas ranging from biochemistry to solar cell development to nanomaterials and molecular electronics,1-11 and donoracceptor organizations are widely exploited in all of these areas. As originally suggested by Mulliken,12 electron transfer in these assemblies involves initial formation of a donoracceptor complex (D 3 3 3 A), which exhibits an intense chargetransfer transition, representing the transfer of a single electron from the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of the donor to the lowest unoccupied MO (LUMO) of the acceptor. It is widely accepted that photoexcitation of the complex generates the ion radical pair (Dþ• 3 3 3 A-•), which can react irreversibly to products or regenerate the complex via back electron transfer,1 and these processes have, for selected donor-acceptor pairs, been followed in solution using ultrafast spectroscopy.13-16 The prototypical Mulliken D 3 3 3 Acomplexes are also model systems for exploring halogen bonding17 and involve donors such as ethylene (C2H4) with acceptors such as the dihalogen Br2, which is the textbook example of electrophilic bromination of an olefin. Isolation and subsequent charge-transfer excitation of the complex is an appealing route to probe the reaction mechanism; however, this has proven difficult. Thus, the complex has been detected and structurally characterized in a supersonic expansion using microwave spectroscopy18 and, following an initial report of the IR spectrum in a lowtemperature mixture of ethylene and bromine,19 was trapped in an inert (Ar) matrix at 10 K using a continuous cocondensation approach.20 Excitation of the isolated complex in the ultraviolet (λ > 300 nm) led to the formation, in nearly equal yield, of the anti and gauche conformers of the single reaction product, 1,2-dibromoethane,20 which was attributed to a radical addition mechanism. In a recent study of the laser photolysis of matrix-isolated 1,2-dibromoethane, we observed the C2H4 3 3 3 Br2 complex as a primary photoproduct and recorded the UV/visible spectrum of the complex for the first time.21 The position of the
r 2010 American Chemical Society
Received Date: July 8, 2010 Accepted Date: August 13, 2010 Published on Web Date: August 18, 2010
2618
DOI: 10.1021/jz1009295 |J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 2618–2621
pubs.acs.org/JPCL
but ensure that the pulses arrived at the cold window in rapid succession. As shown in Figure 2b (trace iii), this resulted in a much larger yield of the desired complex, even without annealing. The observed spectrum of the complex is in good agreement with theory and previous work.20,21 Due to the very small shift in the ν12 band of the monomer upon complex formation (Figure 2), we used the stronger ethylene
complex formation since the complex shows two absorptions in this region that are infrared-inactive in free ethylene. In our initial experiments, trace (i), the timing of the C2H4/ Ar and Br2/Ar pulses was adjusted for maximum overlap, so that both gas pulses were simultaneously present in the mixing channel. This resulted in the complete thermal reaction of the ethylene monomer, as evidenced by the loss of the corresponding bands in the IR spectrum, and the appearance of two broad bands in the IR that we tentatively ascribe to formation of polymeric products. In this case, a thermal reaction occurs in the mixing channel prior to expansion and subsequent deposition. In a second set of experiments, we delayed the C2H4/Ar and Br2/Ar pulses by 1/2 of the inverse repetition rate of the experiment (167 ms), so that a “sandwich” matrix comprised of alternating layers of C2H4 and Br2 in Ar was deposited. Following annealing of the matrix to 33 K and recooling to 5 K, the C2H4 3 3 3 Br2 complex was formed, but in very small yield [trace (ii) in Figure 2b]. Presumably, the diffusion length of the C2H4 monomer is insufficient to afford transport to a Br2 matrix site. From the integrated IR intensities and calculated (MP2/aug-cc-pVTZ) IR spectrum of C2H4 and the C2H4 3 3 3 Br2 complex, we estimate that the ratio of monomer to complex in this case is >50:1. In the final set of experiments, we slightly delayed (by 1 ms) the Br2/Ar pulse in order to limit mixing in the gas phase
Figure 2. (a) Schematic of the matrix isolation apparatus with a dual nozzle late mixing source. (b) Infrared spectra for three different experiments, as described in the text. The calculated (unscaled MP2/aug-cc-pVTZ) spectra of C2H4 and the C2H4 3 3 3 Br2 complex are shown.
Figure 1. UV/visible spectrum of the C2H4 3 3 3 Br2 complex. The calculated (TDCAM-B3LYP/aug-cc-pVQZ) spectrum is shown as the stick spectrum.
Scheme 1. Radical (a) and Charge-Transfer (b) Mechanisms for Reaction of the C2H4 3 3 3 Br2 Complex
r 2010 American Chemical Society
2619
DOI: 10.1021/jz1009295 |J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 2618–2621
pubs.acs.org/JPCL
In conclusion, we have developed a new scheme for the trapping and interrogation of prereactive donor-acceptor complexes that was used to examine photoinduced electron transfer in the prototypical Mulliken donor-acceptor (halogen bonded) π-complex, C2H4 3 3 3 Br2. Excitation into the intense charge-transfer band of the complex leads exclusively to the anti conformer of the reaction product, in agreement with both Mulliken theory and the product distribution of the thermal reaction.19 This work opens new opportunities for direct observation of ultrafast electron transfer in this benchmark system, and we plan to use this approach to study other model halogen-bonded systems.
AUTHOR INFORMATION Corresponding Author: *To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: scott.reid@ mu.edu.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors gratefully acknowledge the
Figure 3. Difference IR spectrum obtained following photolysis of the C2H4/Br2 complex at 266 nm. A single photoproduct is observed, anti-1,2-dibromoethane. The calculated (unscaled MP2/augcc-pVTZ) IR spectra of the complex (lower panel) and the anti (shown in blue and labeled) and gauche conformers of 1,2dibromoethane (upper panel, in equal abundance) are shown.
valuable contributions of Prof. Rajendra Rathore. Support of the National Science Foundation (Grant CHE-0717960), the Donors of the Petroleum Research Fund of the American Chemical Society (Grant 48740-ND6), the NSF Teragrid project (Grant TGCHE100075), and the NSF funded Pere cluster at Marquette is acknowledged.
ν7 band (CH2 wag), which displays a sizable frequency shift upon complexation,20 to estimate the ratio of monomer to complex, determined to be ∼2:1. In comparison, the ratio of complex to thermal reaction product was ∼10:1 under the same conditions. It is possible that this ratio could be further improved by fine-tuning the pulse delay. The charge-transfer photochemistry of the complex was probed by laser irradiation (λ = 266 nm) of a C2H4 3 3 3 Br2 sample prepared according to the developed protocol. The resulting difference IR spectrum, shown in Figure 3, demonstrates the loss of bands assigned to the C2H4 3 3 3 Br2 complex and the growth of bands assigned to a single product, the anti conformer of 1,2-dibromoethane. Thus, in the matrix environment, excitation into the chargetransfer band of the isolated complex leads to the exclusive formation of anti-1,2-dibromoethane via the electrontransfer mechanism shown in Scheme 1b. Specifically, electron transfer following charge-transfer excitation leads to formation of the ion radical pair (C2H4þ• 3 3 3 Br2-•). The breakup of the Br2-• anion radical and subsequent fast reaction of Br• with C2H4þ• leads to a bromonium ion intermediate, which rapidly reacts with Br- in the matrix cage to produce the final product. The bridged structure of the bromonium ion,26-32 which blocks cis addition, is then responsible for the conformational preference in the photoproduct. The excitation wavelength (266 nm) used in this study was chosen to allow efficient population of the charge-transfer band while avoiding excitation of the photoproduct. We have previously shown21 that photolysis of matrix-isolated anti-1,2dibromoethane at 220 nm produces a significant yield of the gauche conformer. The absence of this conformer is further evidence that secondary photolysis of the photoproduct does not occur.
r 2010 American Chemical Society
REFERENCES (1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
2620
Rathore, R.; Kochi, J. K. Donor/Acceptor Organizations and the Electron-Transfer Paradigm for Organic Reactivity. Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 2000, 35, 193–318. Guldi, D. M.; Luo, C.; Swartz, A.; Scheloske, M.; Hirsch, A. SelfOrganisation in Photoactive Fullerene Porphyrin Based Donor-Acceptor Ensembles. Chem. Commun. 2001, 1066– 1067. Kelley, A. M.; Leng, W.; Blanchard-Desce, M. Resonance Hyper-Raman Scattering from Conjugated Organic DonorAcceptor “Push-Pull” Chromophores with Large First Hyperpolarizabilities. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10520– 10521. Sun, D.; Rosokha, S. V.; Kochi, J. K. Donor-Acceptor (Electronic) Coupling in the Precursor Complex to Organic Electron Transfer: Intermolecular and Intramolecular SelfExchange between Phenothiazine Redox Centers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1388–1401. Lemaur, V.; Steel, M.; Beljonne, D.; Bredas, J.-L.; Cornil, J. Photoinduced Charge Generation and Recombination Dynamics in Model Donor/Acceptor Pairs for Organic Solar Cell Applications: A Full Quantum-Chemical Treatment. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6077–6086. Michinobu, T.; May, J. C.; Lim, J. H.; Boudon, C.; Gisselbrecht, J.-P.; Seiler, P.; Gross, M.; Biaggio, I.; Diederich, F. A New Class of Organic Donor-Acceptor Molecules with Large ThirdOrder Optical Nonlinearities. Chem. Commun. 2005, 737– 739. Beckers, E. H. A.; Meskers, S. C. J.; Schenning, A. P. H. J.; Chen, Z.; Wuerthner, F.; Marsal, P.; Beljonne, D.; Cornil, J.; Janssen, R. A. J. Influence of Intermolecular Orientation on the Photoinduced Charge Transfer Kinetics in Self-Assembled Aggregates of Donor-Acceptor Arrays. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 649–657.
DOI: 10.1021/jz1009295 |J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 2618–2621
pubs.acs.org/JPCL
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12) (13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21) (22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
Horiuchi, S.; Kumai, R.; Tokura, Y. Hydrogen-Bonded DonorAcceptor Compounds for Organic Ferroelectric Materials. Chem. Commun. 2007, 2321–2329. Davies, H. M. L.; Denton, J. R. Application of Donor/AcceptorCarbenoids to the Synthesis of Natural Products. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 3061–3071. Chebny, V. J.; Shukla, R.; Lindeman, S. V.; Rathore, R. Molecular Actuator: Redox-Controlled Clam-Like Motion in a Bichromophoric Electron Donor. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1939– 1942. Zhai, L.; Shukla, R.; Rathore, R. Oxidative C-C Bond Formation (Scholl Reaction) with DDQ as an Efficient and Easily Recyclable Oxidant. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3474–3477. Mulliken, R. S.; Pearson, W. B., Molecular Complexes: A Lecture and Reprint Volume. Wiley Interscience: New York, 1969. Dirksen, A.; Kleverlaan, C. J.; Reek, J. N. H.; De Cola, L. Ultrafast Photoinduced Electron Transfer within a SelfAssembled Donor-Acceptor System. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 5248–5256. Nicolet, O.; Banerji, N.; Pages, S.; Vauthey, E. Effect of the Excitation Wavelength on the Ultrafast Charge Recombination Dynamics of Donor-Acceptor Complexes in Polar Solvents. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 8236–8245. Feskov, S. V.; Ionkin, V. N.; Ivanov, A. I.; Hagemann, H.; Vauthey, E. Solvent and Spectral Effects in the Ultrafast Charge Recombination Dynamics of Excited Donor-Acceptor Complexes. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 594–601. Mohammed, O. F.; Vauthey, E. Simultaneous Generation of Different Types of Ion Pairs upon Charge-Transfer Excitation of a Donor-Acceptor Complex Revealed by Ultrafast Transient Absorption Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 5804–5809. Politzer, P.; Lane, P.; Concha, M. C.; Ma, Y.; Murray, J. S. An Overview of Halogen Bonding. J. Mol. Model. 2007, 13, 305– 311. Legon, A. C.; Thumwood, J. M. A. A π-Electron Donor-Acceptor Complex C2H4 3 3 3 Br2 Characterized by Its Rotational Spectrum. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2001, 3, 1397–1402. Kimel'fel'd, Y. M.; Mostova, A. B. Infrared Spectra of Molecular Complexes of Acetylene, Ethylene, And Propylene with Bromine. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 1973, 213, 382–385. Maier, G.; Senger, S. Bromine Complexes of Ethylene and Cyclopropene. Matrix-Ir-Spectroscopic Identification, Photochemical Reactions, Ab Initio Studies. Liebigs Ann./Recl. 1997, 317–326. Kalume, A.; George, L.; El-Khoury, P. Z.; Tarnovsky, A.; Reid, S. A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2010, DOI: 10.1021/jp103953w. Kim, H.; Dooley, K. S.; Johnson, E. R.; North, S. W. Design and Characterization of Late-Mixing Flash Pyrolytic Reactor Molecular-Beam Source. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2005, 76, 124101. Camden, J. P.; Bechtel, H. A.; Zare, R. N. Design and Characterization of a Late-Mixing Pulsed Nozzle. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2004, 75, 556–558. George, L.; Kalume, A.; El-Khoury, P. Z.; Tarnovsky, A.; Reid, S. A. Matrix Isolation and Computational Study of Isodifluorodibromomethane (F2CBr-Br): A Route to Br2 Formation in CF2Br2 Photolysis. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 084503. El-Khoury, P. Z.; George, L.; Kalume, A.; Ault, B. S.; Tarnovsky, A. N.; Reid, S. A. Frequency and Ultrafast Time Resolved Study of iso-CF2I2. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 124501. Brown, R. S.; Nagorski, R. W.; Bennet, A. J.; Mcclung, R. E. D.; Aarts, G. H. M.; Klobukowski, M.; Mcdonald, R.; Santarsiero, B. D. Stable Bromonium and Iodonium Ions of the Hindered Olefins Adamantylideneadamantane and Bicyclo[3.3.1]-
r 2010 American Chemical Society
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
2621
Nonylidenebicyclo[3.3.1]Nonane — X-Ray Structure, Transfer of Positive Halogens to Acceptor Olefins, and Ab-Initio Studies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 2448–2456. Bennet, A. J.; Brown, R. S.; Mcclung, R. E. D.; Klobukowski, M.; Aarts, G. H. M.; Santarsiero, B. D.; Bellucci, G.; Bianchini, R. An Unprecedented Rapid and Direct Brþ Transfer from the Bromonium Ion of Adamantylideneadamantane to Acceptor Olefins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 8532–8534. Berman, D. W.; Anicich, V.; Beauchamp, J. L. Stabilities of Isomeric Halonium Ions C2H4Xþ (X = Chlorine, Bromine) by Photoionization Mass Spectrometry and Ion Cyclotron Resonance Spectroscopy. General Considerations of the Relative Stabilities of Cyclic and Acyclic Isomeric Onium Ions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 1239–1248. Galland, B.; Evleth, E. M.; Ruasse, M. F. An MNDO Approach to the Symmetry of Bromine Bridging in Substituted Bromonium Ions. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1990, 898–900. Hamilton, T. P.; Schaefer, H. F., III. Structure and Energetics of C2H4Brþ: Ethylenebromonium Ion vs Bromoethyl Cations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 8260–8265. Vancik, H.; Percac, K.; Sunko, D. E. Isolation and the IR Spectra of Chloro- and Bromoethyl Cations in Cryogenic Antimony Pentafluoride Matrixes. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun 1991, 807–809. Reynolds, C. H. Structure and Relative Stability of Halogenated Carbocations: The C2H4Xþ and C4H8Xþ (X = Fluoro, Chloro, Bromo) Cations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 8676– 8682.
DOI: 10.1021/jz1009295 |J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 2618–2621