Polymer–Peptide Conjugates Disassemble Amyloid β Fibrils in a

Mar 14, 2017 - Amyloid aggregation and deposition are associated with many intractable human diseases. Although the inhibition of amyloid protein ...
0 downloads 0 Views 894KB Size
Subscriber access provided by University of Newcastle, Australia

Communication

Polymer-Peptide Conjugates Disassemble Amyloid # Fibrils in a Molecular-Weight Dependent Manner Yang Song, Edwin G. Moore, Yanshu Guo, and Jeffrey S. Moore J. Am. Chem. Soc., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b00289 • Publication Date (Web): 14 Mar 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on March 14, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Journal of the American Chemical Society is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Yang Song,†,‡ Edwin G. Moore,*,† Yanshu Guo,‡ and Jeffrey S. Moore*,†,‡ †Department of Chemistry and ‡Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States Supporting Information Placeholder ABSTRACT: Amyloid aggregation and deposition are associated with many intractable human diseases. Although the inhibition of amyloid protein aggregation has been well-studied, the disaggregation and dissolution of existing amyloid fibrils is less known. Taking a fibrillar assembly of amyloid β (Aβ) peptide as the model system, here we report multivalent polymer-peptide conjugates (mPPCs) that disassemble preformed Aβ fibrils into dispersible sub-100 nm structures. Atomic force microscopy and dynamic light scattering studies show that the disassembly rate of preformed Aβ fibrils is controlled by the molecular weight of mPPCs. Rate equations on fibril disappearance are deduced from a simple model, which indicate that the disassembly reaction is first order in the concentration of Aβ fibrils and a pseudo-first order reaction in the concentration of peptide moieties on mPPCs, respectively. We eliminate the possibility that the disassembly occurs by the association between mPPCs and Aβ monomer/oligomers based on circular dichroism and Thioflavin T fluorescence assays. It is mostly likely that the mPPCs disassemble Aβ fibrils through a direct interaction. The mPPCs may thus offer a general macromolecular design concept that breaks down existing amyloid fibrils in a predictable fashion.

Protein misfolding and aggregation are molecular self-assembly processes that are associated with lethal human diseases, including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and type II diabetes.1 The hallmark of most of these diseases is the formation of highly ordered and β-sheet rich aggregates known as amyloid fibrils. Inhibitory modulation is a common strategy to prevent amyloid fibril formation and thus reduce cytotoxicity of amyloid aggregates. Many inhibitory modulators have been developed and shown therapeutic potency, including small molecule-, peptide-, antibody-, and nanomaterial-based inhibitors.2 Compared to the widely-studied modulation and prevention of amyloid aggregation by synthetic agents, disassembly of preformed amyloid fibrils remains largely unknown and challenging. Very few molecules have been reported to break down amyloid fibrils,3 since amyloid fibrils are hypothesized to be the lowest free energy state among all aggregated species and monomer.4 Here we report multivalent polymer-peptide conjugates (mPPCs) as a new class of amyloid fibril breakers that disassemble preformed Aβ fibrils in vitro. The kinetics of fibril disappearance is controlled by the molecular weight of the polymer backbone. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) studies show that mPPCs effectively transform microscale amyloid fibrils above 400 nm in length into nanostructures under 100 nm in diameter. Circular dichroism (CD) studies and Thioflavin T (ThT) fluores-

cence assays5 show that the nanostructures preserve a β-sheet structure, indicating that the disassembly occurs by a direct interaction between mPPCs and intact β-structured Aβ fibrils. We previously reported the design and synthesis of multivalent polymer-iAβ5 conjugates (mP-iAβ5) in which LPFFD (iAβ5) was selected as the peptide moiety for mPPCs, we also previously demonstrated the inhibitory effect of mP-iAβ5 conjugates on Aβ40 fibrillation by modulating the nucleation kinetics for Aβ40 fibril formation.6 Peptide iAβ5 binds to the central hydrophobic sequence Aβ17-21 (LVFFA) of Aβ40 with specificity to interfere with the β-sheet interactions between interstrand LVFFA motifs.7 Through specific peptide interactions and multivalent effect, mPiAβ5 conjugates stabilized transient intermediates of Aβ40 oligomerization into discrete nanostructures. The previous work has demonstrated that mP-iAβ5 conjugates having an average of 7 mol % iAβ5 peptide per polymer chain achieved the optimum inhibitory effect.6 Here, five mP-iAβ5 conjugates with the same 7% peptide loading and a range of molecular weights (22 kDa-224 kDa) were synthesized to investigate the disassembly effect on preformed Aβ40 fibrils (see Supporting Information for the synthetic details). The molecular weight and number of iAβ5 peptide per polymer chain are summarized in Table S1. We use the notation mP-iAβ5-22, mP-iAβ5-46, mP-iAβ5-90, mP-iAβ5-166, and mPiAβ5-224 to designate the molecular weight of these five mPPCs. Although Aβ42 is more pathogenic species, we chose Aβ40 because Aβ40 is several-fold more than Aβ42 in brain.8

Figure 1. Design and structure of mP-iAβ5 multivalent polymerpeptide conjugates. PHPMA stands for poly(hydroxypropyl methacrylamide). The average number (x) of peptide moieties per chain and the number-average degree of polymerization (m) are shown for each mP-iAβ5 conjugate. To evaluate the ability of mP-iAβ5 conjugates to disassemble amyloid fibrils, we conducted experiments in which mP-iAβ5

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

conjugates were incubated with preformed Aβ40 fibrils. Freshly prepared Aβ40 (15 μM) solutions were preincubated at 37 oC for 24 h, which is sufficiently long for mature fibrils to grow, as evidenced by AFM images and ThT fluorescence assays (Figure S2, S12). The preformed Aβ40 fibrils solution was then coincubated with 1.0 equiv of mP-iAβ5 conjugates of different molecular weights, and the morphology transformation of the fibril structures was monitored at 37 oC for 3 days by DLS, AFM imaging, and ThT fluorescence (we define an equiv of mP-iAβ5 as the molar ratio of polymer to Aβ40). Characterization by AFM and DLS show that as the molecular weight of mP-iAβ5 conjugates increases, the disassembly effect on Aβ40 fibrils is enhanced and the fraction of nanostructures under 100 nm in diameter increases (Figure 2). The timedependent disassembly studies by AFM and DLS over 3 days were summarized in Figure S13-S32. The molecular weight of mP-iAβ5 conjugate that completely disassembles preformed Aβ40 fibrils is 166 kDa. AFM images show that mP-iAβ5-166 efficiently disassembled Aβ40 fibrils, and no fibrils were observed after 2 days (Figure 2d, Figure S25a-c). The disassembly of preformed fibrils by mP-iAβ5 conjugates was also quantitatively analyzed by DLS in solution phase. In agreement with AFM images, DLS results confirmed that all Aβ40 fibrils were transformed into dispersible sub-100 nm structures, and 0% of fibrils remained after 3 days of incubation (Figure 2i, S25a’-c’). As a control, in the presence of 60.7 equiv of iAβ5 per Aβ40 (60.7 equiv of iAβ5 is approximately equal to the concentration of iAβ5 moieties on 1.0 equiv of mP-iAβ5-166), the preformed fibrils remained unchanged during 3 days of incubation according to AFM and DLS observations (Figure S26). To investigate the effect of the PHPMA polymer backbone without iAβ5 moieties on Aβ40 disassembly, we incubated preformed Aβ40 fibrils in the presence of 1.0 equiv of 166 kDa PHPMA with and without 60.7 equiv of iAβ5 for 3 days. Controls based on PHPMA and the mixtures of PHPMA with iAβ5 do not have the ability to disassemble the preformed Aβ40 fibrils (Figure S27, S28).

Page 2 of 5

weight of mP-iAβ5 conjugates increases, the rate of disappearance of Aβ40 fibrils accelerates and the fraction of sub-100 nm structures increases. The above results demonstrated that mP-iAβ5 conjugates at the same polymer concentration promote Aβ40 fibril disassembly more efficiently as the molecular weight increases.

Table 1. Aβ40 fibril disassembly by mP-iAβ5 conjugates of different molecular weights monitored by DLS over 3 days. Percentage of structures above 400 nm and under 100 nm are based on DLS histograms.

To decouple the influence of mP-iAβ5 molecular weight from the total iAβ5 moiety concentration, we compared the disassembly effects by keeping the mol concentration of iAβ5 moieties constant. We define mP-iAβ5-46 as the standard and reference the concentration of other mP-iAβ5 conjugates according to their different molecular weights. The mol concentration of corresponding iAβ5 moieties was thus held constant at 16.7 equiv for all mP-iAβ5 conjugates.

Figure 3. Disassembly effects on pre-incubated Aβ40 (15 μM in 10 mM PBS buffer) fibrils by mP-iAβ5 conjugates of different molecular weight at a fixed total concentration of iAβ5 moieties. AFM (top) and DLS (bottom) were recorded after 3 days. The scale bars for AFM images are 500 nm.

Figure 2. Disassembly effects on pre-incubated Aβ40 (15 μM in 10 mM PBS buffer) fibrils by 1.0 equiv mP-iAβ5 conjugates of different molecular weight. AFM (top) and DLS (bottom) were recorded after 3 days. The scale bars for AFM images are 500 nm. To quantitatively characterize the rate of disappearance of Aβ40 fibrils, DLS was used to monitor the percentage of remaining fibrils above 400 nm and formation of nanostructures under 100 nm over 3 days (Table 1). When Aβ40 fibrils were coincubated with mP-iAβ5-22, the percentage of fibrils above 400 nm only decreased by 15% after 3 days, and no dispersible sub-100 nm structures were observed. The corresponding AFM images also confirmed the existence of dense fibrils, although the lengths of fibrils are much shorter when compared to the Aβ40 control (Figure 2a). This finding indicates that, in the presence of low molecular weight mP-iAβ5 conjugate, the fibril disassembly process is slow and only a fraction of Aβ40 peptides transform from the fibrils to dispersible sub-100 nm structures. As the molecular

AFM and DLS results demonstrated that as the molecular weight of mP-iAβ5 conjugates increases, the fraction of remaining fibrils decreases and the fraction of dispersible sub-100 nm structures increases after 3 days (Figure 3). In addition, the rate of disappearance of Aβ40 fibrils accelerates as the molecular weight of mP-iAβ5 conjugates increases (Table 1). The time-dependent disassembly studies by AFM and DLS over 3 days were summarized in Figure S33-S44. The mP-iAβ5-224 disassembles 94% of preformed fibrils after 3 days as indicated by DLS (Table 1), and AFM image shows no fibrillar morphologies (Figure 3e). These findings demonstrate that mP-iAβ5 conjugates of higher molecular weights have better disassembly effects on Aβ40 fibrils even when the mol concentration of iAβ5 moieties is held constant. Our studies demonstrate that mP-iAβ5 conjugates effectively transform preformed Aβ40 fibrils into sub-100 nm structures, and mP-iAβ5 conjugates promote Aβ40 fibril disassembly more efficiently as the molecular weight increases (Table 1). We propose two hypotheses on disassembly mechanisms (Figure 4). The first disassembly mechanism is that mP-iAβ5 conjugates interact with exposed Aβ40 peptides on fibrils (e.g. at the ends of fibrils and

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Journal of the American Chemical Society

defect sites) through multiple specific β-sheet interactions between iAβ5 and LVFFA sequences.7 The mP-iAβ5 conjugates of higher molecular weight create a higher local concentration of iAβ5 through the multivalent effect. These iAβ5 moieties complex with Aβ40 and dissemble Aβ40 fibrils at a rate that depends on the effective molarity of iAβ5 (Figure 4a). The second disassembly mechanism is that mP-iAβ5 conjugates bind to Aβ40 monomer and/or oligomers thus shifting the equilibrium between monomeric/oligomeric Aβ40 peptide and Aβ40 fibrils (Figure 4b).9 Should equilibration occur, random coil Aβ40 structures are expected since freshly prepared Aβ40 solution with mP-iAβ5 conjugates result in random coil Aβ40/mP-iAβ5 complexes (Figure 5, Figure S46). We find that Aβ40 fibril disassembly is not accompanied by a decrease in ThT intensity (Figure S3-S11, the variation of ThT intensity may result from Aβ40 fibril morphology10), which indicates that the fibril-derived Aβ40 when complexed to mP-iAβ5 preserves a β-sheet structure. The β-sheet structure of Aβ40/mPiAβ5 complex was also confirmed by circular dichroism (Figure S45). Thus, mP-iAβ5 conjugates disassemble Aβ40 fibrils by interacting with intact β-structured Aβ40 fibrils rather than monomer and/or oligomers. We do not have direct evidence on the binding between mP-iAβ5 conjugates and Aβ40 fibrils, but AFM images show nanostructures on the surface of Aβ40 fibrils, which may indicate the interaction between mP-iAβ5 conjugates and Aβ40 fibrils (Figure S15a, S17b, S21a). These results also indicate that Aβ40/mP-iAβ5 complex generated from Aβ40 fibril disassembly pathway does not interconvert with Aβ40/mP-iAβ5 complex derived from Aβ40 monomer/oligomers in the inhibition pathway, presumably due to a high energy barrier (Figure 5). Although the β-structured Aβ40/mP-iAβ5 complex is thermodynamically stable, the seeding competency remains to be investigated by adding freshly prepared Aβ40 to the solution of disassembled Aβ40/mPiAβ5 complex.

constant k vs. molecular weight and prove that the rate constant k has a positive correlation with the molecular weight of mP-iAβ5 conjugates (Figure S48). The faster rate of fibril disassembly for mP-iAβ5 conjugates of higher molecular weight results from a lower activation energy Ea (Figure 5).

Figure 5. Reaction coordinate of Aβ40 aggregation pathway without mP-iAβ5 conjugates (solid lines), and the two roles that mPiAβ5 conjugates exhibit on Aβ40 aggregation (dashed lines). Inhibition of fibrillation occurs when Aβ40 monomer is mixed with mP-iAβ5 conjugates, resulting in a random coil complex (dashed lines from the left). Aβ40 fibril disassembly occurs when mature Aβ40 fibrils are mixed with mP-iAβ5 conjugates, resulting in a βstructured complex (dashed lines from the right). Aβ40/mP-iAβ5 complex generated from Aβ40 fibrils and that generated from Aβ40 monomer do not interconvert. In conclusion, we demonstrate that synthetic multivalent polymer-peptide conjugates, as the only polymeric amyloid fibrils breaker to date, effectively disassemble preformed Aβ40 fibrils. The molecular weight of mPPCs is a key parameter that determines the rate and extent of fibril disappearance. We envision that the concept described herein could be generalized by changing the peptide moieties on mPPC that specifically interact with different amyloid proteins and disassemble amyloid fibrils in a predictable fashion. The therapeutic potency and the physico-chemical properties of mPPC are currently under investigation.

Figure 4. Postulated pathways on Aβ40 fibril disassembly by mPiAβ5 conjugates: (a) mP-iAβ5 conjugates interact with Aβ40 fibrils and disassemble Aβ40 fibrils into β-structured complex, which is congruent with CD and ThT results. (b) Aβ40 fibrils are in equilibrium with monomeric/oligomeric Aβ40 peptide, and mP-iAβ5 conjugates interact with monomeric/oligomeric Aβ40 peptide, which shift the equilibrium to the disassembly direction. The result is a random coil complex. Rate equations for Aβ40 fibrils disappearance are modeled as the percentage of Aβ40 peptide in fibrils above 400 nm vs. time (Figure S47, S49). Experimentally, this is monitored by DLS (Table 1). Aβ40 monomer is invisible by DLS due to its small size, but it does not affect the percentage of other populations, because the percentage of Aβ40 monomer is negligible based on the reaction coordinate (Figure 5). The linear regressions of natural log of the fibril percentage vs. time demonstrate that the disassembly of Aβ40 fibrils is a first order reaction in the concentration of Aβ40 fibrils and a pseudo-first order reaction in the concentration of iAβ5 β-sheet breaker peptide, respectively. We plotted the rate

Details of synthesis of mP-iAβ5 conjugates; ThT fluorescence assays, AFM, and DLS on Aβ40 fibril disassembly studies; kinetic studies and rate equations of Aβ40 fibril disappearance. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

[email protected] [email protected]

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of the American Chemical Society

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Part of this work was performed in the Microscopy Suite at the Beckman Institute of Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois. Research supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering under Award No. DE-FG0207ER46471.

(1) (a) Eisenberg, D.; Jucker, M. Cell 2012, 148, 1188-1203. (b) Aguzzi, A.; O’Connor, T. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 2010, 9, 237-248. (c) Chiti, F.; Dobson, C. M. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2006, 75, 333-366. (2) (a) Härd, T.; Lendel, C. J. Mol. Biol. 2012, 421, 441-465. (b) Zhu, L.; Song, Y.; Cheng, P.-N.; Moore, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 80628068. (c) Bard, F.; Cannon, C.; Barbour, R.; Burke, R.-L.; Games, D.; Grajeda, H.; Guido, T.; Hu, K.; Huang, J.; Johnson-Wood, K.; Khan, K.; Kholodenko, D.; Lee, M.; Lieberburg, I.; Motter, R.; Nguyen, M.; Soriano, F.; Vasquez, N.; Weiss, K.; Welch, B.; Seubert, P.; Schenk, D.; Yednock, T. Nat. Med. 2000, 6, 916-919. (d) Mishra, R.; Bulic, B.; Sellin, D.; Jha, S.; Waldmann, H.; Winter, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4679-4682. (e) Bieschke, J.; Russ, J.; Friedrich, R. P.; Ehrnhoefer, D. E.; Wobst, H.; Neugebauer, K.; Wanker, E. E. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107, 7710-7715. (f) Sievers, S. A.; Karanicolas, J.; Chang, H. W.; Zhao, A.; Jiang, L.; Zirafi, O.; Stevens, J. T.; Munch, J.; Baker, D.; Eisenberg, D. Nature 2011, 475, 96-100. (3) (a) Blanchard, B. J.; Chen, A.; Rozeboom, L. M.; Stafford, K. A.; Weigele, P.; Ingram, V. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 14326-14332. (b) Meng, F.; Abedini, A.; Plesner, A.; Verchere, C. B.; Raleigh, D. P. Biochemistry 2010, 49, 8127-8133. (c) Wang, Q.; Yu, X.; Patal, K.; Hu, R.; Chuang, S.; Zhang, G.; Zheng, J. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2013, 4, 1004-1015. (d) Gordon, D. J.; Sciarretta, K. L.; Meredith, S. C. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 8237-8245. (4) (a) Hamley, I. W. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 5147-5192. (b) Cheng, P.-N.; Liu, C.; Zhao, M.; Eisenberg, D.; Nowick, J. S. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 927933. (5) (a) Chafekar, S. M.; Malda, H.; Merkx, M.; Meijer, E. W.; Viertl, D.; Lashuel, H. A.; Baas, F.; Scheper, W. ChemBioChem 2007, 8, 1857-1864. (b) Cheng, P.-N.; Liu, C.; Zhao, M.; Eisenberg, D.; Nowick, J. S. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 927-933. (c) Cheng, P.-N.; Spencer, R.; Woods, R. J.; Glabe, C. G.; Nowick, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 14179-14184. (6) Song, Y.; Cheng, P.-N.; Zhu, L.; Moore, E. G.; Moore, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 5233-5236. (7) (a) Soto, C.; Sigurdsson, E.; Morelli, L.; Kumar, R.; Castano, E.; Frangione, B. Nat. Med. 1998, 4, 822-826. (b) Soto, C.; Kindy, M.; Baumann, M.; Frangione, B. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1996, 226, 672-680. (c) Viet, M. H.; Ngo, S. T.; Lam, N. S.; Li, M. S. J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 7433-7446. (8) (a) Gu, L.; Guo, Z. J. Neurochem. 2013, 126, 305-311. (b) Wurth, C.; Guimard, N. K.; Hecht, M. H. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 319, 1279-1290. (9) (a) Carulla, N.; Caddy, G. L.; Hall, D. R.; Zurdo, J.; Gairi, M.; Feliz, M.; Giralt, E.; Robinson, C. V.; Dobson, C. M. Nature 2005, 436, 554558. (b) O’Nuallain, B.; Shivaprasad, S.; Kheterpal, I.; Wetzel, R. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 12709-12718. (c) Sato, T.; Kienlen-Campard, P.; Ahmed, M.; Liu, W.; Li, H.; Elliott, J. I.; Aimoto, S.; Constantinescu, S. N.; Octave, J.-N.; Smith, S. O. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 5503-5516. (10) Lindberg, D. J.; Wranne, M. S.; Gilbert Gatty, M.; Westerlund, F.; Esbjörner, E. K. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 458, 418-423.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 5

Page 5 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Journal of the American Chemical Society

TOC Graphic

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

5