Preparation of Carbon Nanofiber Supported Platinum and Ruthenium

electrostatically with charged sites on the support surface.1 It is still uncertain .... were treated in N2 at 973 K to remove (part of) the surface o...
2 downloads 0 Views 668KB Size
J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 11611-11619

11611

Preparation of Carbon Nanofiber Supported Platinum and Ruthenium Catalysts: Comparison of Ion Adsorption and Homogeneous Deposition Precipitation Marjolein L. Toebes, Martijn K. van der Lee, Lai Mei Tang, Marije H. Huis in ‘t Veld, Johannes H. Bitter, A. Jos van Dillen, and Krijn P. de Jong* Department of Inorganic Chemistry and Catalysis, Debye Institute, Utrecht UniVersity, PO Box 80 083, 3508 TB Utrecht, Netherlands ReceiVed: December 31, 2003; In Final Form: May 18, 2004

Carbon nanofiber (CNF) supported platinum catalysts have been prepared using Pt(NH3)4(NO3)2 as a precursor by two different ion adsorption techniques, one at a constant pH and one in which the pH is gradually and homogeneously increased from 3 to 6 by hydrolysis of urea. The latter method resembles the procedure of homogeneous deposition precipitation (HDP). Characterization of the CNF support was performed by acidbase titration, thermogravimetric mass spectrometry, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and for the various platinum catalysts, transmission electron microscopy, H2-chemisorption, and X-ray fluorescence/inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry were utilized. With both synthesis techniques from diluted precursor solutions homogeneously distributed, highly dispersed and thermally stable metal particles were obtained with an average particle size of 1-2 nm. With the HDP method for the Pt/CNF catalysts, a linear relationship between the number of acidic oxygen-containing groups on the surface of activated CNF and the metal loading has been found. For the highest loaded catalyst, a platinum/adsorption site ratio of 0.5 was established, corresponding to about 0.7 Pt(NH3)42+ molecules/nm2. Furthermore, it has been established that with this procedure higher platinum loadings (∼4 wt %) can be achieved than with the ion adsorption procedure (