Primary Structure of Potential Allergenic Proteins in Emu (Dromaius

The emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) egg is considered promising as an alternative egg product. To obtain basic biochemical information on emu egg white...
0 downloads 0 Views 3MB Size
12530

J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 12530–12536 DOI:10.1021/jf103239v

Primary Structure of Potential Allergenic Proteins in Emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) Egg White KENJI MAEHASHI,*,† MAMI MATANO,† TOMOHIRO IRISAWA,‡ MASATAKA UCHINO,‡ YASUHARU ITAGAKI,§,# KATSUMI TAKANO,‡ YUTAKA KASHIWAGI,† AND TOSHIHIRO WATANABE^ † Department of Fermentation Science, and ‡Department of Applied Biology and Chemistry, Tokyo University of Agriculture, 1-1-1 Sakuragaoka, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 156-8502, Japan, §Department of Human Science, Hokkaido Bunkyo University, 5-196-1 Kogane-Chuo, Eniwa, Hokkaido 061-1449, Japan, #Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology, 3-2-1 Sakado, Takatsu-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 213-0012, Japan, and ^Department of Food and Cosmetic Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture, 196 Yasaka, Abashiri, Hokkaido 099-2493, Japan

The emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) egg is considered promising as an alternative egg product. To obtain basic biochemical information on emu egg white, the major protein compositions in emu and chicken egg whites and the primary structures of potential allergenic proteins were compared. The dominant protein in emu egg white was ovotransferrin (OVT), followed by ovalbumin (OVA) and TENP protein. The OVA and ovomucoid (OVM) levels in emu egg white were estimated as significantly lower than those in chicken egg white by Western blotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays using anti-chicken OVA or OVM antibodies. Lysozyme and its enzymatic activity were not detected in emu egg white. OVT, OVA, and OVM genes were also cloned, and their nucleotide and amino acid sequences were determined. The protein sequences of OVT, OVA, and OVM from emu showed lower similarities to those of chicken than other avian species, such as quail and turkey. These results emphasize the low allergenicity of emu egg white and its potential as an alternative to chicken egg white. KEYWORDS: Egg white; emu; ovalbumin; ovomucoid; ovotransferrin; TENP

INTRODUCTION

The emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) is native to Australia and is the second largest member of the ratite family, which includes the ostrich, rhea, and cassowary. Emus have come to be considered as an alternative form of livestock, and their production has increased in Japan. These birds produce eggs that are 10 times larger than chicken eggs and, thus, are of interest as an alternative egg product. However, before emu eggs can be used in foods, their allergenicity must be assessed, because chicken egg white is one of the most common allergenic foods and causes serious immediate hypersensitivity reactions or anaphylaxis, which are mediated by immunoglobulin (IgE), in infants and young children (1, 2). The emu egg has traditionally been believed by native Australians to have low allergenicity, although there is no scientific evidence to support this. Significantly fewer studies have been conducted on emu egg white compared with chicken egg white, which has been extensively characterized with respect to its biochemical, physicochemical, and immunological properties. The characterization of emu egg white proteins is essential for further industrial use of emu eggs. Therefore, we have identified the major proteins present in emu egg white and predicted the allergenicity of emu egg white compared to chicken egg white on the basis of the *Corresponding author (phone/fax þ81-3-5477-2748; e-mail maehashi@ nodai.ac.jp).

pubs.acs.org/JAFC

Published on Web 11/08/2010

composition of potential allergenic proteins and their primary sequences. MATERIALS AND METHODS Materials. Eggs and tissue samples from egg-laying emus were obtained from Tokyo Nodai Bio-Industries Co., Ltd. (Abashiri, Japan). White Leghorn eggs were obtained from a local market. The egg whites were homogenized in a blender for 10 s at room temperature. A piece of tissue was excised from the emu oviduct and immediately stored in RNAlater (Ambion, Inc., Austin, TX) until use. Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). SDS-PAGE was performed according to the method of Laemmli (3). The homogenized egg whites were diluted 10 times with water and mixed with an equal volume of loading buffer prior to heat treatment. The resulting egg white samples of emu and chicken eggs were run on an SDS-PAGE. The molecular weight of the proteins was estimated by SDSPAGE under reducing conditions. Low molecular weight markers (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences Corp.) included phosphorylase b for 97 kDa, albumin for 66 kDa, ovalbumin (OVA) for 45 kDa, carbonic anhydrase for 30 kDa, trypsin inhibitor for 20 kDa, R-lactalbumin for 14 kDa, and a BenchMark Protein ladder (Invitrogen Co., Carlsbad, CA). These were used to obtain a calibration curve to determine molecular weights of 50 kDa with 7.5% gel. After electrophoresis, the gels were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue R-250 (CBB). To determine the proportion of different proteins present in the total protein, the CBB-stained bands separated on SDS-PAGE were analyzed by

© 2010 American Chemical Society

Article

J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 58, No. 23, 2010

12531

Table 1. Primers Used for Cloning of cDNAs for Emu Egg White Proteins primer name

sequence (50 f30 )

OT-3F OT-2R OT-6F OA-10F OA-15F OA-12R OA-21F OA-19R OA-23F OA-13R OM-1F OM-2R OM-5F OM-9F OM-8R OM-15F OM-16R OM-21F OM-23R OM-24F OM-14R

GGGGACAGTCTGTGACCAA CATCTGGAGGAGATCTGATGG CCCATGGGCTTGATTCACAACA GTTGATGCCATTTACTTCAAAGG GATGTATTCAAGGAGCTCAAAGTC GCCTGATACATCATCTGCACAG GGTCAAACTTCTGAAGGGAACC CTTACTGGCAAGGCTGAGCG CACAGCTGGAAAGCTGTATTGC CTGATTGTAGTCTCAAGCTGCTC TTGCTACGGTGGACTGCAG GCATTTTCCAAAGTGCCC CCTCTGTGTGGCTCTGAC AGCCGGGCAGTACCTCACC TGCTGTCAGAGCCACACAGAGG GTGCTGCTCTCTCTTGTGCTTTG GCATTCGTTGCTGTAAGTGACTC CAAGAGATGAAAACAAGCCAGAGG CCTCTGCAGCATCTTGAGAG TAGCAGCCTGCAGACTCGAG GCAAGATGAACTGAGGTGAGATC

designed on the basis ofa oOVT (AJ786651) oOVT (AJ786651) oOVT (AJ786651) eOVA-V8 fragmentb cOVA (NM_205152) OA-10/AP-2 fragment cOVA (J00895) OA-15/-12 fragment OA-20/-19 fragment OA-10/AP-2 fragment third domain of eOVMb third domain of eOVMb OM-1/-2 fragment cOVM (J00902) OM-1/-2 fragment cOM-9/-8 fragment cOM-9/-8 fragment OM-15/-16 fragment OM-15/-16 fragment OM-23/-14 fragment OM-5/AP-2 fragment

a o, ostrich; c, chicken; e, emu. Accession numbers are indicated in parentheses. Codons for these protein sequences were selected on the basis of the cOVM nucleotide sequence.

b

densitometric quantification using a Gel-Pro analyzer (Media Cybernetics, Inc., Bethesda, MD). Western Blotting. After separation of egg white proteins by SDSPAGE, bands were electroblotted on a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane. A Morinaga FASPEK egg protein Western blot kit (ovalbumin) (Morinaga Institute of Biological Science, Yokohama, Japan) and a Morinaga FASPEK egg protein Westen blot kit (ovomucoid) were used for detection of OVA and ovomucoid (OVM), respectively, according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Chicken and emu egg white samples were diluted 12000 and 60000 times, and then 10 μL of these samples was loaded and separated on an SDS-PAGE. The total protein contents of the 12000 and 60000 times diluted samples were 10 and 2 μg/mL in chicken egg whites and 9.2 and 1.8 μg/mL in emu egg whites. Protein concentration was determined according to the bincinchoninic acid (BCA) method using a Pierce BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Primary antibodies to chicken OVA (antiOVA antibodies) and to chicken OVM (anti-OVM antibodies) obtained from immunized rabbits included in the kit were used for emu and chicken egg whites. A Vectastain ABC-AP Rabbit IgG kit (Vector Laboratories, Ltd., Burlingame, CA) was used as a secondary antibody, and an alkaline phosphatase substrate kit IV BCIP/NBT (Vector Laboratories, Ltd.) was used to detect the secondary antibody. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). ELISA was performed to estimate antigenicity to chicken OVA using a Morinaga Egg Protein ELISA kit (Morinaga Institute of Biological Science), which was originally intended for the determination of egg protein content in food samples based on the reactivity to the anti-OVA antibody (4). The procedure followed the manufacturer’s instructions. Emu and chicken egg white samples were serially diluted from 2.8  105 to 8.8  106 times and from 4.8  106 to 1.5  108 times, respectively, with distilled water to give protein concentrations of 6.25-400 and 0.78-25 ng/mL, respectively. Protein concentration was determined by using the BCA method. Protein Sequencing. To determine the partial amino acid sequences of sample proteins, in-gel digestion was performed following the method of Cleveland et al. (5) using Staphylococcus aureus V8 protease (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan) as described in our previous paper (6). After electroblotting on a PVDF membrane (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), each separated band of a proteolytic fragment was excised from the membrane and subjected to a protein sequencer PPSQ-21 (Shimazdu, Kyoto, Japan) for amino (N)-terminal analysis. The resultant protein sequence data were analyzed using the NCBI protein BLAST program. Measurement of Lysozyme (LYZ) Enzyme Activity. The bacteriolytic activity of LYZs toward Micrococcus lysodeikticus cells (Sigma-Aldrich

Figure 1. SDS-PAGE patterns of emu and chicken egg whites. Homogenized egg whites from emu and chickens were diluted 1:10 and loaded on a 15% gel. The gels were stained with CBB. Japan, Osaka, Japan) was measured turbidimetrically in a cell suspension of 0.2 mg/mL using a homogenized egg white sample. According to Pooart et al. (7), 0.1 M Britton-Robinson buffer at pH 5-11 was used to measure. The decrease in absorbance due to bacteriolysis was then monitored at 450 nm with a Beckman DU640 spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc.). Cloning of cDNAs for Emu Egg Proteins. Emu oviduct cDNA was prepared as described previously (6). Briefly, total RNA was extracted from an emu oviduct using TRI reagent (Molecular Research Center, Inc., Cincinnati, OH). Single-stranded cDNA synthesis was performed using a SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis SuperMix kit and an oligo-dT(20) primer (Invitrogen Co.). The amplified cDNA was used for subsequent PCR amplifications with ExTaq DNA polymerase (Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan). The primers used for amplification of OTF, (OVM), and OVA are listed in Table 1. The amplicons were cloned into pCR2.1-TOPO (Invitrogen Co.) and sequenced by Macrogen Japan Corp. (Tokyo, Japan). 30 Rapid Amplification of cDNA end (30 RACE). To isolate the downstream region of the 30 end of the cDNA, we performed 30 RACE. Single-stranded cDNA synthesis was performed using an oligo-dT primer with the adaptor sequence 50 -AACTGGAAGAATTCGCGGCCGCAGGAATTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTT-30 and RNA prepared from the emu oviducts. This amplicon was used as a template for subsequent PCR using emu cDNA primers for OVA or OVM and an adaptor primer AP-2 (50 -AACTGGAAGAATTCGCGGCCGCAGGAA-30 ). The amplicons were cloned into pCR2.1-TOPO (Invitrogen Co.) and sequenced by Macrogen Japan Corp. The resultant nucleotide sequence data were analyzed with the NCBI nucleotide BLAST program. Inverse PCR. To determine the nucleotide sequence of the 50 end of the OVM gene, we performed inverse PCR (8). Emu genomic DNA was extracted from the emu ovary using a QIAGEN Blood & Cell Culture DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN K.K., Tokyo, Japan), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. First, we decided to use a restriction enzyme such as KpnI from the sequence of the amplified fragment from emu genomic DNA with the primers OM-15F and OM-16R. Then the genomic DNA was digested with KpnI, and the digest was self-ligated using a FastLink DNA Ligation Kit (Epicenter Biotechnologies, Madison, WI). PCR amplification was then performed using the primers OM-23R and OM-21F to obtain a fragment that included the 50 untranslated region of the emu OVM gene. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Identification of Major Proteins in Emu Egg White. Total protein content in emu egg white has been reported as 8.9%, which was less than the 10.5% of standard chicken egg (9). We diluted emu and chicken egg white samples 10 times and compared their SDS-PAGE patterns. As shown in Figure 1, chicken egg white showed four major protein bands: ovotransferrin (OVT), OVA, OVM, and LYZ with proportions of 19, 54, 7, and 5%, respectively (data not shown). This composition of

12532

J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 58, No. 23, 2010

Maehashi et al.

Table 2. Identification of the Major Proteins in Emu Egg White band A B C D E F others

partial amino acid sequence

identified as b

MVLVDAIYFKGTCEKACKDE AAPKATVRWCTISSc TKSPDCGGILSPDGLSYFAc VEVDCSKYPNTTNEDGKEVLc VEVDCSKYPNTTNEDGKEVLc VEVDCSKYPNTTNEDGKEVLc

ovalbumin ovotransferrin TENP protein ovomucoid ovomucoid ovomucoid

MW approximate (kDa) proportiona (%) 102 78 52 39 34 30

15 33 16 7d

29 total 100

a

The proportion of each protein was densitometrically estimated from the CBBstained bands on SDS-PAGE shown in Figure 1. b Internal sequence. c N-Terminal sequence. d Sum of three ovomucoids of D, E, and F. These amino acid sequences are listed in UniProt Knowledgebase under accession numbers P86380, ovalbumin; P85895, ovotransferrin; P86384, TENP protein; and P05560, ovomucoid.

major proteins found in chicken egg white was nearly consistent with data obtained previously by others (10). In contrast, emu egg white exhibited three major protein bands, A, B, and C, with molecular masses of 102, 78, and 52 kDa, respectively. The 78 kDa band was identical in size with OVT in the chicken egg protein; however, the other bands in the emu egg white differed in size from those in the chicken egg white. Notably, no similar band was observed in emu egg white at 45 kDa, which is the most abundant protein, OVA, in chicken egg white. To identify the major proteins found in emu egg white by SDSPAGE, the bands were electroblotted onto a PVDF membrane and subjected to the protein sequencer. As a result of N-terminal amino acid sequencing, seven bands, A-F, found in SDS-PAGE for the emu egg white were identified (Table 2). The most abundant protein in emu egg white band B comprised 33% of the total emu egg white proteins and was identified as OVT because of its high N-terminal sequence similarity to that of chicken egg white. Emu OVT has the same molecular mass as chicken OVT. The protein with the highest molecular mass among the major proteins in emu egg white, band A, was not identified directly by N-terminal sequencing, indicating that its N-terminus was blocked by modified amino acid residues. Therefore, in-gel digestion was conducted using the band A protein excised from the SDS-PAGE gel. Amino acid sequencing of a fragment from the band A after cleavage with V8 protease revealed the partial internal amino acid sequence of the band A protein. As this was very similar to the chicken OVA sequence based on the BLAST protein search, band A was identified as OVA despite its molecular mass being double that of chicken OVA. Thus, it was found that OVA was contained in emu egg white and its molecular mass was significantly different from those in other avians such as chicken, quail, and turkey (11), although it has been unidentified in emu egg white because a 45 kDa band corresponding to chicken OVA is not seen in emu egg white on SDS-PAGE (9, 11). The 19 N-terminal amino acids of band C were sequenced, and band C was found to have 73.7% similarity with chicken TENP protein. TENP protein has been reported to be transiently expressed in the chicken retina and brain (12), but its biological function has yet to be clarified. Recently, it was reported that chicken TENP protein has strong homology with a bacterial permeability-increasing protein family (13). Bands D, E, and F were found to have the same N-terminal sequences and were identified as OVM. Chicken OVM is a 28 kDa protein with trypsin inhibitor activity containing 20-25% carbohydrate. It has been reported previously that chicken OVM consists of several variants with different carbohydrate contents (14), although one major band was seen in chicken

egg white. In contrast, three bands of OVM were evenly seen in emu egg white. The estimate of the proportion of OVM in emu egg white based on SDS-PAGE (Figure 1) suggests that the OVM content in emu egg white is less than that in chicken egg white (Table 2). Surprisingly, the LYZ band was not found in emu egg white despite its being a major protein in chicken and also several other avian egg whites, because it plays an important role in protecting the egg against bacterial infections. Detection of LYZ in Emu Egg White. LYZ, a bacteriolytic enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of β-1,4 glycosidic bonds in the peptidoglycan of bacterial cell walls, is classified into several types including two major types of chicken (c-LYZ) and goose types (g-LYZ). Several ratite family members, such as the ostrich (15), cassowary (16), and rhea (7), have g-LYZ in their egg whites, whereas chicken, quail, and turkey have c-LYZ in their egg whites. However, neither c-LZY (MW of approximately 14 kDa) nor g-LYZ (MW of approximately 20 kDa) was detected in emu egg white by SDS-PAGE with CBB (Figure 1) or silver staining (data not shown). Furthermore, no LYZ bacteriolytic activity was detected in emu egg white (data not shown), although Feeney et al. reported a LYZ content in emu egg white of 0.05% based on its bacteriolytic activity (17). Other ratite LYZs have been reported to show optimum lytic activity at lower pH than chicken LYZ (18). Therefore, we measured the lytic activity in emu egg white at a broad range of pH levels. However, no lytic activity was detected at pH 5-11 (data not shown). In several cases, a g-type LYZ exhibits higher lytic activity, for example, 6 and 10 times higher in goose and ostrich g-LYZs, respectively (15) than in chicken c-LYZ. As we did not detect any lytic activity in emu egg white, c-LYZ, which is a major allergen, must not exist in substantial amounts in emu egg white. To our knowledge, this is the first report of an avian egg white in which LYZ was not detected, although Feeney et al. reported just a small amount (