Proteomics of Parma Dry-Cured Ham: Analysis of Salting Exudates

Jun 29, 2017 - Image Analysis. Two replicate 2D gels were run for each pooled sample and analyzed with PDQuest 8.0 software (BioRad). The average vari...
2 downloads 3 Views 4MB Size
Subscriber access provided by FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIV

Article

PROTEOMICS OF PARMA DRY-CURED HAM: ANALYSIS OF SALTING EXUDATES Gianluca Paredi, Roberto Benoni, Giovanni Pighini, Luca Ronda, Adam Dowle, David Ashford, Jerry Thomas, Giovanna Saccani, Roberta Virgili, and Andrea Mozzarelli J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b01293 • Publication Date (Web): 29 Jun 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on July 18, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 34

1

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

PROTEOMICS OF PARMA DRY-CURED HAM: ANALYSIS OF SALTING EXUDATES

2 3

Gianluca Paredi^°, Roberto Benoni^, Giovanni Pighini^, Luca Ronda§, Adam Dowle@, David

4

Ashford@, Jerry Thomas @, Giovanna Saccani#, Roberta Virgili# and Andrea Mozzarelli^°#*

5

^Department of Food and Drug, §Department of Medicine and Surgery, °Interdepartmental Center

6

SITEIA.PARMA, University of Parma, Parma, Italy

7 8 9

@

Bioscience Technology Facility, Department of Biology, and University of York, York, UK #

Stazione Sperimentale per l’Industria delle Conserve Alimentari (SSICA), Parma, Italy #

National Research Council, Institute of Biophysics, Pisa, Italy

10

11 12 13 14 15 16

*Corresponding author: Andrea Mozzarelli, Department of Food and Drug, University of Parma,

17

Viale delle Scienze 23/A, 43124, Parma, Italy. Email [email protected]

18 19

Andrea Mozzarelli orcid.org/0000-0003-3762-0062

20 21 22 23

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 2 of 34

24

Abstract

25

The production of Parma dry-cured ham involves steps of salting, drying and ripening. Although

26

sea salt is the only preserving agent, strategies are pursuing aimed at reducing salt content for

27

decreasing its negative impact on consumer health. A 24-hour pressure treatment was applied

28

before salting for reducing thickness and inequalities in shape. To evaluate the potential impact of

29

the pressure step on process outcome, differential proteomic analyses by complementarity 2D-

30

PAGE and LC-MS/MS were carried out on exudates collected at day 1, 5 and 18 of the salting

31

phase for hams treated or untreated with pressure. Specific proteins were found differentially

32

abundant in exudates from pressed vs unpressed hams and as a function of time. These changes

33

include glycolytic enzymes and several myofibrillar proteins. These findings indicate that pressure

34

causes a faster loosening of myofibrillar structure with release of specific groups of proteins.

35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42

Keywords: dry-cured ham, salting exudates, proteomics, 2D-PAGE, LC-MS/MS

2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 34

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

43

INTRODUCTION

44

Parma dry-cured ham is a traditional high quality Italian food product, classified as “Protected

45

Designation of Origin” (P.D.O). In 2015, over 8.000.000 thighs were processed according to the

46

tutelary rules of Parma Ham Consortium that, with the dossier CEE N°2081/921, regulate raw

47

matter requirements and production process. Briefly, domestic heavy pigs bred for Parma ham are

48

fed according to an established dietary regimen until slaughtering, occurring when pigs are at least

49

nine months old and 160 Kg of average live weight. Trimmed fresh hams should meet specific

50

requirements of weight, covering fat thickness, absence of pathological conditions and visual

51

defects. The traditional processing of dry-cured ham consists of two salting steps, drying phases at

52

low and room temperature and an aging step for at least 12 months overall processing time. On

53

average, at the end of the whole production process, the ham weight decreases by about 30%. The

54

protected designation of origin “Parma Ham” is deserved to those dry-cured hams meeting P.D.O.

55

requirements. Quality criteria aim to mark with the brand only dry-cured hams with limited quantity

56

of salt and moisture, and with an adequate proteolysis degree, in order to achieve the typical flavor

57

without affecting texture and taste. According to the P.D.O. specifications, the allowed ranges for

58

salt and moisture vary from 4.2 to 6.2 g/100g, and from 59 to 63.5 g/100g, respectively. Proteolysis

59

degree, expressed as percent ratio between nitrogen soluble in 5% trichloroacetic acid and total

60

nitrogen, is established to be from 24 to 31. Higher variations are permitted for salt and proteolysis

61

since more affected by meat quality and processing.

62

Nowadays, due to the high consumption of salted processed food, the sodium chloride intake is

63

approximately 9-12 g/day2. High salt intake increases blood pressure and might cause

64

cardiovascular and renal diseases3. Furthermore, the European code against Cancer 4th edition4,5

65

recommends to “limit red meat and food high in salt” in order to reduce cancer risk and

66

hypertension. However, in dry-cured ham production process, sodium chloride is crucial because it

67

acts as a bacteriostatic agent6, reduces water activity, and plays an active role in the development of

68

sensory and quality parameters of the final product7. Differently from the processing of dry-cured 3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 4 of 34

69

hams in other countries, such as Spain and France where nitrite and nitrate are used, no other

70

ingredient than sea salt is allowed in Parma dry-cured ham. Therefore, the reduction of sodium

71

chloride in the production of dry-cured ham is not an easy task to accomplish. Furthermore, low salt

72

levels are associated with higher moisture and proteolysis degree than standard salt levels,

73

triggering defects such as softness and pastiness in dry-cured ham8.

74

Proteomic analyses provide an insight of the molecular modifications that muscles undergo

75

throughout the entire phases of meat transformation, from muscle to meat and from meat to food

76

product9,10. In a previous study, we investigated by two-dimensional electrophoresis (2D-PAGE)

77

the qualitative/quantitative variations in the proteome of exudates as a consequence of the

78

application of different technological treatments in the production of cooked ham11. Proteomics

79

studies have been also carried out aimed at the characterization of the modifications that dry-cured

80

ham undergoes under different conditions. Particularly, changes of myofibrillar and water soluble

81

protein components during ripening were investigated12. Furthermore, the protein pattern of

82

semimembranosus and biceps femoris muscles from Bayonne dry-cured hams was compared with

83

2D-PAGE13. Recently, a label free mass spectrometry approach was applied to determine the

84

changes in water soluble proteome at different processing times14 and to characterize the proteolytic

85

activity of endogenous endopeptidases on muscle proteins15.

86

In this study, the effect of the application of a pressure treatment to fresh hams before the salting

87

phase was investigated by proteomic tools. The pressure treatment is not usually applied to pork

88

thighs to be processed into dry-cured hams. However, it has been attempted as a tool to reduce ham

89

thickness and shape variability, thus shortening and equalizing the time required for salt penetration

90

inside ham and moisture flow outside16. The expected effect is to counteract the increase moisture

91

and proteolysis usually occurring in the reduced-salt dry-cured ham. A similar approach was

92

previously adopted16 resulting in an increased salt concentration and a water activity reduction in

93

dry-cured hams during the intermediate processing stages, critical for product safety. No

94

modification of weight losses and final salt content with respect to non-pressed hams was observed. 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 34

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

95

The proteomics analysis was pursed via the characterization of the exudate collected from the brine

96

losses of hams salted as such or after pressure application, at different times. Exudates are protein-

97

rich media obtained during the salting steps in the production of both cooked and dry-cured ham,

98

generated from the salt-mediated rupture of muscle cells over the time-dependent salt penetration

99

within meat. Thus, exudate reports on the overall effect of salting on muscle cells. Proteomic

100

analysis was carried out by 2D-PAGE with peptide mass fingerprinting to identify protein spots.

101

Furthermore, a LC-MS/MS approach was exploited to overcome the drawbacks of 2D-PAGE, such

102

as the difficulty in the separation of proteins characterized by extreme basic pI, low or high

103

molecular weight, high hydrophobicity, insolubility and lower abundance17. To our knowledge, this

104

is the first investigation that exploits ham exudates recovered from the salting stage for the

105

proteomic characterization of the early processing steps from pork to dry-cured ham.

106

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sample preparation. Eight fresh legs from Landrace

107

Large White domestic heavy pigs were selected in a local slaughterhouse according to the

108

requirements of Parma Ham Consortium reported in CEE N°2081/921. Ham selection was carried

109

out in compliance with post mortem time, weight, shape, trimming way, fat thickness, meat quality

110

and visual appearance provided for by abovementioned tutelary regulations. Next, before salting,

111

four hams were randomly assigned to pressure treatment and four hams to standard storage. Weight

112

was 13.26 ± 0.30 kg and 13.15 ± 0.14 kg, fat thickness 2.78 ± 0.86 cm and 2.75 ± 0.50 cm, pH 5.62

113

± 0.03 and 5.69 ± 0.14 for unpressed and pressed hams, respectively. Fresh hams were conditioned

114

at low temperature (1-3°C) and 80-90% RH for 24 h prior to salting, placed horizontally on a shelf,

115

side by side, and arranged with the large thick bottom of each unit sided by the narrow shank of the

116

adjacent one, to form a continuous ham layer. In the case of the hams to be pressed, a plank was put

117

on four subsequent hams and eight specifically made concrete blocks, 6 kg each, were put on the

118

plank, perpendicularly to the hams for 24 hours, exerting a pressure corresponding to 12 kg/ham. At

119

the end of the pressure treatment, the height was measured in the thickest part of the ham when 5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 6 of 34

120

placed horizontally, close to the trimming line between the uncovered muscular mask and the part

121

covered by the rind, using a gauge designed for this measure. Unpressed hams had height of 18.51 ±

122

0.79 cm, whereas pressed hams had height of 18.21 ± 0.66 cm and 15.58 ± 0.23 cm before and after

123

pressure application, respectively.

124

The salting phase was performed in two steps using a mixture of 2- and 3-mm grain size salt. Wet

125

salt (nearly 15% added water) was rubbed on ham rind, whereas dry salt was added to unskinned

126

ham surface. In the first salting phase, the legs were covered with ≈3.0% salt (% ham weight) and

127

placed at 1-3°C, 80-90% RH for six days. Subsequently, hams were desalted and underwent a

128

second salting step with ≈2.0% added salt, for 12 days, under the same environmental conditions.

129

After each salting treatment, hams were desalted by scrubbing off the unabsorbed salt with brushes.

130

At the end of the salting step, average weight losses corresponding to 2.72% and 3.34% were

131

recorded for unpressed and pressed hams, respectively. During salting, exudates dripped from hams

132

were collected from each ham placed individually into a large vessel, after 1, 5 and 18 days. Before

133

processing, exudates were stored at -80°C. For processing, exudates were thawed and centrifuged at

134

16000 g for 15 minutes to remove insoluble material. Due to the high salt concentration, 1 mL of

135

each sample solution was dialyzed against 40 mM Tris, 0.5% SDS, pH 7.4, for 24 hours. Protein

136

concentration was determined using the Bradford assay with bovine serum albumin for calibration.

137

Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE). Protein precipitation with acetone was

138

carried out for 500 µl of dialyzed sample and the pellet solubilized in 7 M urea, 2 M thiourea and

139

4% CHAPS buffer. Protein samples from the four pressed hams were pooled prior subsequent

140

analysis, thus obtaining a single sample for each day (day 1, day 5 and day 18). The same pooling

141

procedure was carried out for the four unpressed hams. IEF strips (11 cm pH 4-7) were rehydrated

142

for 16 hours at 20 °C with 200 µg of protein solubilized in 7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% w/v

143

CHAPS, 65 mM DTE and 0.2 % v/v ampholites. Protein focusing was achieved with a multi-phase

144

programme: 1) 600 V for 1 hour 2) 1000 V for 1 hour 3) 4000 V for 1 hour 4) 8000 V for 1 hour 5)

145

8000 V until 26000 V/H in the pH range 4-7. Then, strips were equilibrated for 15 minutes in 6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 7 of 34

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

146

reducing buffer containing 6 M urea, 2% w/v SDS, 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.8, 30% v/v glycerol, 1%

147

w/v DTT, and for 15 minutes in alkylating buffer containing 6 M urea, 2% w/v SDS, 50 mM Tris–

148

HCl pH 8.8, 30% v/v glycerol, 4% w/v iodoacetamide. The second dimension was performed with

149

Criterion TGX any kD resolving gel (Bio-Rad®) applying 200 V for 50 minutes. Finally, gels were

150

stained with Bio-Safe Coomassie (Bio-Rad®).

151

Image analysis. Two replicate 2D gels were run for each pooled sample and analyzed with

152

PDQuest 8.0 software (BioRad®). The average variation coefficient for replicate gels was found to

153

be 32%, that is comparable to CV values obtained in previous investigations18-20. Detection and

154

matching steps were carried out automatically using the same parameters for each replicate group.

155

Moreover, a manual control step was performed to build a more accurate master gel for each

156

replicate group. The generated higher level match-set maps were compared to detect qualitative and

157

quantitatively differences between the 2D reference maps for pressed and unpressed hams at

158

different sampling times, and for either pressed or unpressed hams as a function of time. A 2-fold

159

change threshold in spot averaged and normalized abundance was considered relevant for the

160

analysis, according to common practice in 2D-PAGE data analysis 21-24.

161

Peptide mass fingerprinting. Protein spots excised from gels were digested with trypsin.

162

Briefly, spots were de-stained using a mixture of 50% v/v ethanol and 15% acetic acid. Two

163

washing steps of the spots were performed in 20 mM ammonium bicarbonate and 50% v/v

164

acetonitrile for 20 minutes. A further washing step was carried out in acetonitrile before drying in a

165

vacuum centrifuge. Rehydration of spots was performed for 30 minutes with 20 µL of 20 mg/ml

166

Proteomics Grade trypsin in 20 mM ammonium bicarbonate, 9% v/v acetonitrile and 0.1 mM

167

hydrochloric acid. After rehydration, 50 µL of 20 mM ammonium bicarbonate was added and the

168

spots were incubated at 37°C for 16 hours. The supernatants containing peptides were recovered

169

and combined with peptides that were further obtained from gels upon two washes with 50% v/v

170

acetonitrile/0.1% v/v TFA. The supernatant was dried and resolubilised in 20 µL 50% v/v 7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 8 of 34

171

acetonitrile/0.1% v/v TFA. For MALDI TOF/TOF analysis, 0.5 µL of sample were mixed with 0.5

172

µL of 10 mg/mL α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (HCCA) in 30% v/v acetonitrile 0.07% v/v TFA

173

before spotting onto the plate. MALDI spectra were acquired on the 4800 Plus MALDI

174

TOF/TOF™ (Ab Sciex) in positive ion reflectron mode combining 500 shots in the mass range 700-

175

3500 Da. External calibration was performed using Sigma peptide standards: bradykinin fragment

176

1–7 (m/z 757.3997), angiotensin II (human) (m/z 1046.5423), P14R (m/z 1533.8582), ACTH

177

fragment 18–39 (human) (m/z 2465.1989) and insulin chain B oxidized (m/z 3,494.6513). Resulting

178

MS spectra were submitted to database searching using the Mascot online search engine against the

179

SwissProt database. The search was restricted to mammalian proteins. Carbamidomethyl

180

modification was set as a fixed modification whereas methionine oxidation was set as a variable

181

modification and two missed cleavages were tolerated. Peptide mass tolerance was set at 100 ppm.

182

LC-ESI-MS/MS. Protein samples were digested according to FASP protocol25 and LC-

183

MS/MS analysis was carried out using a nanoAcquity UPLC system (Waters) for peptide

184

separation, coupled to a maXis LC-MS/MS System (Bruker Daltonics) with a nano-electrospray

185

source. Chromatographic separation was performed with a nanoAcquity Symmetry C18, 5 µm trap

186

(180 µm x 20 mm Waters) and a nanoAcquity BEH130 1.7 µm C18 capillary column (75 µm x 250

187

mm, Waters) using a flow rate of 300 nL/min, at 60°C. A gradient of two solvents (solvent A: 0.1%

188

(v/v) formic acid and solvent B: acetonitrile containing 0.1% (v/v) formic acid) was applied for the

189

separation. The initial condition was 5% solvent B, followed by a linear gradient to 30% solvent B

190

over 125 min, then a linear gradient to 50% solvent B over 5 min, and finally a wash with 95%

191

solvent B for 10 min. Positive ESI-MS and MS/MS spectra were acquired using AutoMSMS mode.

192

Instrument settings were: ion spray voltage: 1,400 V, dry gas: 4 L/min, dry gas temperature 160 °C,

193

ion acquisition range: m/z 50-2,200. Resulting tandem mass spectra were submitted to the SwissProt

194

database using the Mascot search engine. The search was restricted to porcine proteins and two

195

missed cleavages were allowed. Carbamidomethyl modification was set as a fixed modification, 8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 34

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

196

whereas methionine oxidation was set as a variable modification. A value of 10 ppm was used for

197

peptide tolerance and a 0.1 Da for the fragment tolerance. Peptide matches were filtered to require a

198

minimum expected score of 0.05 at 0.05 significance. The Mascot calculated emPAI value was used

199

to estimate the relative abundance of identified proteins. Molar percentage was calculated as

200

reported using the formula: ∑

201

the number of observed peptides and Nobservable is the number of calculated observable peptides26.

202

Only differences in molar fraction percentage of at least 1.5-times were considered relevant,

203

according to common practice in the analysis of LC-MS/MS experiments21-24. The resulting

204

proteins were submitted to Mann–Whitney U test with p