Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Modeling Coupled with

5 days ago - (18) The best ranked docking pose of peptides in the active site of ACE was obtained according to the binding energy value. 2.9. Peptide ...
0 downloads 11 Views 1MB Size
Subscriber access provided by - Access paid by the | UCSB Libraries

Functional Structure/Activity Relationships

QSAR Modeling Coupled with Molecular Docking Analysis in Screening of ACE Inhibitory Peptides from Qula Casein Hydrolysates Obtained by Two-enzyme Combination Hydrolysis Kai Lin, Lan-wei Zhang, Xue Han, Zhao-xu Meng, Yi-fan Wu, Jian-ming Zhang, and Da-you Cheng J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b00313 • Publication Date (Web): 09 Mar 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on March 9, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 30

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

QSAR Modeling Coupled with Molecular Docking Analysis in Screening of ACE

2

Inhibitory Peptides from Qula Casein Hydrolysates Obtained by Two-enzyme

3

Combination Hydrolysis †

Kai Lin , Lanwei Zhang

4

†, ‡,§

*

, Xue Han





, Zhaoxu Meng , Jianming Zhang ,



Yifan Wu , Dayou Cheng

5



**



6

† School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology,

7

Harbin 150000, China

8

‡ College of Food Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao

9

266003, China

10

§ Hua Ling Biotechnology Research Center, Lanzhou 730000, China

11

*

12

e-mail: [email protected] phone number: +86-451-86282901, Fax: +86-451-

13

86282901

14

**

15

e-mail: [email protected] phone number: +86-451-86282901, Fax: +86-451-86282901

16

Kai Lin e-mail: [email protected]

Corresponding Author: Lan-wei Zhang

Co-corresponding author: Xue Han

17

1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

18 19

Abstract: In this study, Qula casein derived from yak milk casein was hydrolyzed using

20

a two-enzyme combination approach and high angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE)

21

inhibitory activity peptides were screened by quantitative structure-activity relationship

22

(QSAR) modeling integrate with molecular docking analysis. Hydrolysates (< 3 kDa)

23

derived from combinations of thermolysin+alcalase and thermolysin+proteinase K

24

demonstrated high ACE inhibitory activities. Peptide sequences in hydrolysates derived

25

from these two combinations were identified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass

26

spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Based on the QSAR modeling prediction, a total of 16

27

peptides were selected for molecular docking analysis. The docking study revealed that

28

four of the peptides (KFPQY, MPFPKYP, MFPPQ and QWQVL) bound the active site

29

of ACE. These four novel peptides were chemically synthesized and their IC50 was

30

determined. Among these peptides, KFPQY showed the highest ACE inhibitory

31

activity (IC50: 12.37±0.43 μM). Our study indicated that Qula casein present an

32

excellent source to produce ACE inhibitory peptides.

33

Key words: ACE inhibitory peptide, Molecular docking, Two-enzyme combination,

34

QSAR modeling, Qula casein

35

2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 30

Page 3 of 30

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

36 37 38

1. Introduction Every year, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) take the lives of 17.7 million

39

individuals,

which

represents

31%

of

all

deaths

worldwide

40

(http://www.who.int/cardiovascular_diseases/en/). Hypertension is one of the main

41

contributory factor to CVDs 1. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) plays an

42

important role in the regulation of blood pressure through both the renin-angiotensin

43

system (RAS) and kallikrein kinnin system (KKS). In the RAS, the ACE is responsible

44

for converting deca-peptide angiotensin I into a potent vasoconstrictor octa-peptide

45

angiotensin II. In addition, in the KKS, ACE inactivated the vasodilator, bradykinin 2.

46

Therefore, inhibiting the activity of ACE is considered an effective therapeutic

47

approach for the treatment of hypertension. In the clinic, hypertension is treated with

48

synthetic ACE inhibitors, such as Captopril, Lisinopril and Enalapril. However, these

49

synthetic ACE inhibitors may lead to several side effects, including dry cough,

50

headache, and fever 3.

51

Due to the reported side effects of synthetic drugs, the extraction of ACE inhibitory

52

peptides from natural food sources to replace synthetic drugs has attracted widespread

53

attention. The potential bioactive peptides are inactive within the sequence of parent

54

proteins, but can be released during enzymatic digestion 4. In many studies, the use of

55

various enzymes has been reported to hydrolyze different proteins, including silkworm

56

pupa 5, smooth-hound viscera 6, buffalo milk 7, pinto bean 8, marine sponge (Stalotella

57

aurantium) 9. Most of the research strategies involved hydrolyzing the protein with 3

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

58

individual enzymes to obtain ACE inhibitory peptides. However, since different

59

enzymes have their own specific enzyme cleavage sites, using a combination of

60

enzymes to hydrolyze a protein may produce novel ACE inhibitory peptides compared

61

to single enzymatic hydrolysis. In previous studies, a combination of enzymes has been

62

used to hydrolyze various proteins for the production of ACE inhibitory peptides 10-13.

63

However, multi-step purification approaches in conventional peptide discovery

64

strategies are required to obtain novel ACE inhibitory peptide, and it involves a low

65

yield and high associates costs

66

quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling, has successfully been applied to

67

predict the biological activities of peptides 15-17. In addition, molecular docking analysis

68

has been employed to illuminate the spatial interaction between receptor proteins and

69

donor peptides 9, 18-19. Compared with traditional experimental studies, in silico analysis

70

is time-saving and more economical to quickly discover novel ACE inhibitory peptides

71

20

14

. In recent years, in silico approach, such as

.

72

Yak milk is the most common product in northwestern China, and includes

73

Xinjiang, Gansu, and Tibet. For residents of these areas, yak milk is the key ingredient

74

of their daily diets. However, due to the lack of transportation and storage, it is a

75

challenge to collect and process fresh yak milk. Most yak milk is naturally acidified,

76

leached, collected and dried to produce Qula. Qula is a type of crude cheese, and its

77

main component is casein 21. Currently, Qula has only been used as a raw material for

78

the production of different grades of industrial casein

79

casein into valuable bioactive peptides has significant potential.

22

4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

. Therefore, converting Qula

Page 4 of 30

Page 5 of 30

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

80

To our knowledge, data on the use of QASR modeling coupled with molecular

81

docking analysis to screen ACE inhibitory peptides from Qula casein hydrolysates

82

obtained by two-enzyme combination hydrolysis is limited. The aim of this study was

83

to provide a fast and efficient method for screening novel ACE inhibitory peptides

84

derived from Qula casein hydrolysates using two-enzyme combination through

85

integrated QSAR modeling with molecular docking approach. Potential ACE inhibitory

86

peptides were synthesized and evaluated for their in vitro activities.

87

2. Materials and methods

88

2.1. Chemicals

89

Qula casein was obtained from Hualing Casein Co. (Gansu province, China).

90

Angiotensin I-converting enzyme from rabbit lung (EC 3.4.15.1; 2U/mg protein), N-

91

Hippuril-L-histidy-L-leucine (HHL), thermolysin from Geobacillus stearothermophilu

92

(EC 3.4.21.1), alcalase from Bacillus licheniformis (EC 3.4.21.62), trypsin from

93

porcine pancreas (EC 3.4.21.4), proteinase K from Tritirachium album (EC 3.4.21.64),

94

and papain from Carica papaya (EC 3.4.22.2) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St.

95

Louis, MO, USA). All other reagents were of analytical reagent grade.

96

2.2. Preparation of Qula casein

97

Qula casein was prepared from Qula through isoelectric precipitation following a

98

previously published method 21, with slight modifications. In brief, Qula was suspended

99

in double-distilled water (8 % w/v) and the pH was adjusted to 8 using 1 M NaOH. The

100

suspension was stirred with a magnetic stirrer for 30 min at 500 rpm and 45 °C, then

101

high-speed sheared at 10,000 rpm for an additional 15 min. The obtained solution was 5

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

102

passed through a 200-mesh filter cloth and the permeate was centrifuged at 11,000 g

103

for 10 min to remove residual fat. To induce casein precipitation, the supernatant was

104

acidified to pH 4.6 with 1 M HCl. Finally, the casein precipitate was washed three times

105

with double-distilled water, freeze-dried, and stored at -20 °C until further analysis.

106

2.3. Hydrolysis of Qula casein with two-enzyme combination

107

Based on our previous studies23, five enzymes (thermolysin, alcalase, papain,

108

proteinase K, and trypsin) were selected for two-enzyme combined hydrolysis of Qula

109

casein. The hydrolysis time, pH, and temperature of each enzyme were presented in

110

Table 1. Qula casein (4 % w/v) was dissolved in 100 mM Tris-HCl buffer and heated

111

for 10 min at 90 °C under constant stirring. Next, this solution was adjusted to the

112

optimum temperature and pH for each enzyme. For hydrolysis using the two-enzyme

113

approach, Qula casein was first hydrolyzed by one enzyme, and inactivated prior to

114

addition of the second enzyme. Enzymes were added to the solution at a 3:1 (U/mg)

115

enzyme/protein ratio. The pH was maintained constant by adding 1 M NaOH. At the

116

end of hydrolysis, the reaction mixture was incubated in boiling water for 10 min to

117

inactivate the enzyme. The mixture was centrifuged for 20 min at 12,000 g at 4 °C and

118

the supernatant was collected. The degree of hydrolysis (DH) in Qula casein

119

hydrolysates was determined using the o-phthaldialdehyde approach as previously

120

described 24.

121

The Qula casein content was determined by the Kjeldahl method (N × 6.38)

122

(AOAC 2000) 25, and the peptide concentration in each hydrolysate was determined by

123

the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) method (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) following the 6

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 30

Page 7 of 30

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

124

manufacturer’s instructions.

125

2.4. Ultra-filtration

126

Qula casein hydrolysates were separated by ultra-filtration using a regenerated

127

cellulose membrane with a 3 kDa molecular mass cut-off (Millipore Co., Billerica, MA,

128

USA). Permeates were stored at -20 °C until further analysis.

129

2.5. IC50 determination of Qula casein hydrolysates (< 3 kDa)

130

The ACE inhibitory activities of Qula casein hydrolysates < 3 kDa and synthetic

131

peptides were evaluated and expressed as IC50 values, which were determined using

132

methods described in our previously published study 23.The IC50 values were defined

133

as the concentration that inhibited 50 % of the ACE activity.

134

2.6. LC-MS/MS analysis

135

Identification of peptides in 3 kDa permeates was performed using a Q-Exactive

136

mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) coupled with a

137

Thermo Scientific EASY-nLC 1000 System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA,

138

USA). Samples were loaded in a reverse phase trap column (2 cm × 100 μm, 5 μm-

139

C18), which was connected to a reverse phase analytical column (75μm × 100 μm, 3

140

μm-C18). Buffer A (0.1 % formic acid in LC/MS grade H2O) was used for equilibration

141

of chromatographic columns, whereas buffer B (0.1 % formic acid in 84 % LC/MS

142

grade acetonitrile) was utilized for sample separation. For LC-MS/MS analysis, the

143

sample was injected into the trapping column at a flow rate of 300 nL/min using a

144

gradient from 0 % B to 35 % B over 50 min, followed by a gradient from 35 % B to

145

100 % B over 5 min, and was finally maintained at 100 % B over 5 min. The mass 7

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

146

spectrometer (MS) was operated in positive-ion detection mode, and the most abundant

147

precursor ions from the scanning range of 300-1800 m/z were selected to obtain MS

148

data. Automatic gain control target was set to 3e6 and the first-order maximum injection

149

time was 50 ms. The dynamic exclusion duration was 40 s. Survey scans were obtained

150

at a resolution of 70,000 at m/z 200, whereas the resolution for higher-energy collisional

151

dissociation (HCD) spectra was set to 17,500 at m/z 200. Other parameters were as

152

follows: isolation window: 2 m/z, second-order maximum injection time: 60 ms,

153

normalized collision energy: 27 eV, and underfill ratio: 0.1%. Raw data were analyzed

154

by Mascot software (version 2.3.0, Matrix Science, London, England) using a UniProt

155

Knowledgebase (http://www.uniprot.org/), containing the sequences of αs1-casein

156

(L8I5S0), αs2-casein (L8I6J3), β-casein (L8I8G5), and κ-casein (L8IIT8).

157

2.7. Prediction of ACE inhibitory activities of peptides by QSAR modeling

158

ACE inhibitory activities of peptides that were identified in the present study were

159

predicted using the QSAR modeling that was described in our previous study 23. Four

160

ACE inhibitory peptide databases containing penta-peptides, hexa-peptides, hepta-

161

peptides and octa-peptides were constructed. In brief, identified peptides were

162

converted into X-matrix by means of z-5 scales 26. In the peptide descriptor variable,

163

the amino acid at the C-terminus was designated as c1, and its properties were described

164

as c1z1, c1z2, c1z3, c1z4, and c1z5. Similarly, the second position from the C-terminus

165

was designated as c2, and its properties were described as c2z1, c2z2, c2z3, c2z4, and

166

c2z5, etc. ACE inhibitory activities of identified peptides were predicted using SIMCA-

167

P version 11.5 software (Umetrics, Umeå, Sweden) with partial least squares (PLS) 8

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 30

Page 9 of 30

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

168

regression. For each QSAR model, the top two ranked peptides with the highest

169

predicted ACE inhibitory activities were selected for further analysis.

170

2.8. Molecular docking analysis

171

The structures of the predicted peptides with the highest predicted ACE inhibitory

172

activities were constructed using Chem Office 2015 software (Cambridge Soft Co.,

173

Boston, MA, USA). The structure was energy minimized using steepest descent and

174

conjugate gradient techniques. The 3D structure of human ACE (1O8A.pdb) was

175

derived from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) (http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/home/home.do).

176

Prior to the docking analysis, the structure of water molecules and the inhibitor

177

Lisinopril were removed from the data set using Discovery Studio 2.5 software (San

178

Diego, CA, USA), whereas atoms of the cofactors zinc and chloride were retained in

179

the active site of the crystal structure of ACE. The molecular docking study of the

180

peptides at the ACE binding site was performed using Autodock Tools (ADT, version:

181

1.5.6). Docking runs were carried out using a radius of 80 Å, with coordinates x: 40.79,

182

y: 33.61, and z: 43.38 18. The best ranked docking pose of peptides in the active site of

183

ACE was obtained according to the binding energy value.

184

2.9. Peptide synthesis

185

Potential ACE inhibitory peptides as selected by QSAR modeling and molecular

186

docking studies were chemically synthesized by Sangon Biotech. Co., Ltd. (Shanghai,

187

China). The purity (> 98 %) and sequences of these peptides were verified by analytical

188

HPLC-MS/MS analysis. ACE inhibitory activity was determined as described above.

189

2.10. In silico estimation of anti-gastrointestinal digestion and toxicity of ACE 9

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

190

inhibitory peptides

191

In silico analysis of the potential survival of synthetic peptides in vivo was

192

performed by using Peptidecutter software (http://web.expasy.org/peptide_cutter/).

193

ACE inhibitory peptides were evaluated using enzymes that were present in the

194

gastrointestinal tract, including pepsin (EC 3.4.23.1, pH 1.3 and pH > 2), trypsin (EC

195

3.4.21.4), and chymotrypsin (EC 3.4.21.1). The toxicity of the peptides was predicted

196

using the online tool ToxinPred (http://www.imtech.res.in/raghava/toxinpred/).

197

2.11. Statistical analysis

198

Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) and were analyzed by

199

one-way ANOVA using SPSS17.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Group

200

mean comparisons were conducted using Duncan multiple range test. A value of p