Subscriber access provided by ROBERT GORDON UNIVERSITY
Article
Relative Activity Factor (RAF)-based Scaling of Uptake Clearance Mediated by Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptide (OATP) 1B1 and OATP1B3 in Human Hepatocytes Saki Izumi, Yoshitane Nozaki, Hiroyuki Kusuhara, Koichiro Hotta, Toshiki Mochizuki, Takafumi Komori, Kazuya Maeda, and Yuichi Sugiyama Mol. Pharmaceutics, Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b00138 • Publication Date (Web): 10 May 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 14, 2018
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 38 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Molecular Pharmaceutics
Relative Activity Factor (RAF)-based Scaling of Uptake Clearance Mediated by Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptide (OATP) 1B1 and OATP1B3 in Human Hepatocytes
Saki Izumi*, Yoshitane Nozaki, Hiroyuki Kusuhara, Koichiro Hotta, Toshiki Mochizuki, Takafumi Komori, Kazuya Maeda, and Yuichi Sugiyama
Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics Tsukuba, Tsukuba Research Laboratories, Eisai Co., Ltd., 5-1-3 Tokodai, Tsukuba-shi, Ibaraki, 300-2635, Japan (S. I., Y. N., K. H., T. M., T. K.)
Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacokinetics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-003, Japan (H. K., K. M.)
Sugiyama Laboratory, RIKEN Innovation Center, Research Cluster for Innovation, RIKEN, 1-6 Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan (Y. S.)
*Corresponding author
1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Molecular Pharmaceutics 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Corresponding Author: Saki Izumi, PhD Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics Tsukuba, Tsukuba Research Laboratories, Eisai Co., Ltd. 5-1-3, Tokodai, Tsukuba-shi, Ibaraki, 300-2635, Japan Telephone: +81-29-847-5656 Fax: +81-29-847-5672 E-mail:
[email protected] 2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 38
Page 3 of 38 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Molecular Pharmaceutics
Table of Contents/Abstract Graphic
3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Molecular Pharmaceutics 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Abstract In vitro–in vivo extrapolation based on uptake clearance determined in human hepatocytes has been used to predict in vivo hepatic clearance of organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) substrates. This study evaluated the relative activity factor (RAF) approach to extrapolate active uptake clearance in transporter-transfected cell systems (CLuptake) to that in human hepatocyte suspensions (PSinf,act). RAF values for OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 were determined in two batches of cryopreserved human hepatocytes using estrone-3-sulfate and cholecystokinin octapeptide as reference substrates, respectively. Fourteen OATP1B substrate drugs selected (atorvastatin, bosentan, cerivastatin,
fexofenadine, fluvastatin, glibenclamide,
irbesartan, nateglinide, pitavastatin,
pravastatin, rosuvastatin, telmisartan, torasemide, and valsartan) showed temperature-dependent uptake in human hepatocytes. In transporter-transfected cells, OATP1B1- and OATP1B3-mediated uptake was observed in all compounds except for telmisartan. RAF-based net CLuptake was mainly accounted for by OATP1B1 (72.3% – 99.7%), and fell within the 3-fold of PSinf,act observed in human hepatocytes in 11 out of 13 compounds (excluding telmisartan). This study demonstrated that the RAF approach provides a quantitative index of OATP1B1- and OATP1B3-mediated PSinf,act in human hepatocytes, which will facilitate the optimization of the pharmacokinetic properties of OATP1B substrates at nonclinical stages of drug development.
4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 38
Page 5 of 38 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Molecular Pharmaceutics
Keywords Organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP), hepatic uptake, human hepatocytes, relative activity factor (RAF)
Abbreviations AUC, area under the plasma concentration-time curve; BSA, bovine serum albumin; BW, body weight; CCK-8, cholecystokinin octapeptide; CLh, hepatic clearance; CYP, cytochrome P450; PK, pharmacokinetic(s); HMG-CoA, hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA; IVIVE, in vitro-in vivo extrapolation; KHB, Krebs Henseleit buffer; NTCP, Na+-taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide; OAT, organic anion transporter; OATP, organic anion transporting polypeptide; RAF, relative activity factor; REF, relative expression factor.
5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Molecular Pharmaceutics 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 6 of 38
Introduction To identify drug candidates expected to have adequate pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles targeted therapeutic areas, the prediction of human PK profiles is routinely performed at nonclinical stages, wherein the full bottom-up approach is often adopted. Among the PK parameters, the prediction of hepatic clearance (CLh) of drug candidates is a key factor for estimating the impact of the first-pass effect after oral dose and hepatic elimination from systemic circulation on the extent of drug exposure. To avoid significant species differences in expression levels as well as substrate selectivity of drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters expressed in the liver
1-2
, in vitro–in vivo
extrapolation (IVIVE) using human liver tissue-derived in vitro systems, such as liver microsomes and hepatocytes, is widely used in pharmaceutical industries. In the liver, OATP1B1 (SLCO1B1) and OATP1B3 (SLCO1B3) play pivotal roles in the hepatic uptake of various anionic drugs, such as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), angiotensin receptor blockers, antidiabetics, and direct-acting antivirals 3-4. Although many OATP1B substrate drugs are also subjected to hepatic metabolism, IVIVE based on uptake clearance determined in human hepatocytes offers better metrics for their overall hepatic intrinsic clearance in vivo (CLint,all,vivo) than that based on human microsomal metabolic clearance does
5-7
. Nevertheless,
this approach has some practical issues, such as low throughput (particularly in suspension systems), high assay cost, large inter-batch differences in the uptake activity of OATP1B substrates, and limited availability of human hepatocytes with adequate transporter-mediated uptake activities. To address these issues, in the present study, we used the relative activity factor (RAF) approach to extrapolate human hepatocyte uptake clearance from alternative in vitro systems of transporter-transfected cells. The RAF approach was originally developed for cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes
8
to
estimate the metabolic clearance and contribution of each CYP isoform in human liver microsomes from recombinant systems based on the metabolic activities of CYP-isoform selective substrates 9-10. This approach has also been applied to drug transporters, and many previous studies mainly focused on the estimating relative contribution of hepatic (OATP1B1 and OATP1B3) or renal (organic anion
6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 7 of 38 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Molecular Pharmaceutics
transporter (OAT) 1, OAT3, and organic cation transporter 2) uptake transporters to the total transporter-mediated tissue uptake clearance of the test substrates
11-18
. Hirano et al. (2004)
demonstrated that the uptake clearance of pitavastatin and estradiol-17β-glucuronide in human hepatocytes agreed well with that estimated by the RAF approach in three batches of human hepatocytes12. Kunze et al. (2014) also demonstrated that RAF and relative expression factor (REF, based on liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry analysis) values were very similar to each other and that OATP1B1- and OATP1B3-mediated uptake clearance of some statins predicted by the RAF and REF approaches was within a two-fold error estimate of the uptake clearance observed in human hepatocytes17. These findings suggested that transporter-transfected cell systems can be a substitute for human hepatocytes to predict CLint,all,vivo of OATP1B substrates at nonclinical stages. Among the available methods, the RAF approach is considered useful for quantitative bridging of the different in vitro systems because this approach is practical and readily applicable to drug discovery and development settings due to the technical simplicity. In the present study, we comprehensively evaluated the capability of the RAF approach to estimate the active uptake clearance of 14 OATP1B substrate drugs across drug classes in human hepatocytes from transporter-transfected cell systems, focusing on OATP1B1 and OATP1B3. Hepatic uptake assay was conducted in two batches of human hepatocytes that had been fully characterized in terms of the uptake of OATP1B substrates and was validated by a good correlation with human CLint,all,vivo in our previous study 7.
7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Molecular Pharmaceutics 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 8 of 38
Materials and Methods Chemicals. [3H]Estrone-3-sulfate ([3H]E1S, 45.6 Ci/mmol) and [3H]cholecystokinin octapeptide ([3H]CCK-8, 98.7 Ci/mmol) were purchased from PerkinElmer Life Sciences (Boston, MA). Pitavastatin calcium, pravastatin sodium, and glibenclamide (glyburide) were obtained from Wako Pure Chemical Industries (Osaka, Japan). Atorvastatin calcium trihydrate, cerivastatin sodium, irbesartan, rosuvastatin calcium, and valsartan were from LKT Laboratories (St. Paul, MN), and fluvastatin sodium, fexofenadine hydrochloride, and bosentan were from Toronto Research Chemicals (Toronto, ON, Canada). Torasemide and nateglinide were obtained from Tokyo Chemical Industries (Tokyo, Japan) and Tocris Bioscience (Minneapolis, NM), respectively. Telmisartan, silicon oil (d = 1.05 g/mL), and mineral oil (d = 0.84 g/mL) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). All other chemicals used were of analytical or reagent grade and were from Wako Pure Chemical Industries.
Cell Culture. The human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells stably expressing OATP1B1 (SLCO1B1, OATP1B1-HEK), OATP2B1-HEK)
OATP1B3 and
(SLCO1B,
corresponding
OATP1B3-HEK),
control
(control-HEK) were established previously
19-20
(empty
and
OATP2B1
vector-transfected)
(SLCO2B1,
HEK293
cells
. The cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified
Eagle’s medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10% (v/v) of fetal bovine serum, penicillin (final concentration, 100 units/mL), streptomycin (100 µg/mL), and hygromycin B (80 µg/mL) at 37°C in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2 gas. For cellular uptake study, the cells were seeded in the poly-D-lysine-coated 24-well plate (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) at a density of 2 × 105 cells/well and cultured for 48 hours in the CO2 incubator.
Cellular Uptake Study in Transporter-transfected HEK293 Cells. Cellular uptake study was performed as described previously
8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
21
. Final concentrations of
Page 9 of 38 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Molecular Pharmaceutics
test compounds in Krebs Henseleit buffer (KHB, pH7.4) are given in Figure legends. For telmisartan, the uptake was also evaluated in KHB containing 0.25% and 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA). The amount of test compounds taken up into the cells were quantified by liquid scintillation counting (Tri-Carb 3100TR; PerkinElmer Life Sciences) for radiolabeled compounds or by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for unlabeled compounds, as reported previously
21
. Protein content per well was quantified by using BCA Protein Assay Kit
(Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The uptake of test compounds in the time-course experiments was expressed as an uptake volume (µL/mg protein), which was calculated by dividing the amount of the compound taken up into the cells (dpm/well or pmol/well) by the product of the buffer concentration (dpm/µL or pmol/µL) and protein content (mg protein/well).
Uptake Study in Cryopreserved Human Hepatocyte Suspensions. Two batches of cryopreserved human hepatocytes, lots VRR (pool of 50 donors) and OJE (single donor), purchased from Bioreclamation IVT (Baltimore, MD) were used in this study. These human hepatocyte batches had been fully characterized in terms of hepatic uptake of various OATP1B substrate drugs in our laboratories 7. The cryopreserved hepatocytes were recovered in Cryopreserved Hepatocyte Recovery Medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (cell viability >85% in all preparations). The hepatic uptake assay was performed by using an oil-spin method according to our previous study
7
. Briefly, after
pre-incubating hepatocyte suspensions, an equal volume of KHB containing a radiolabeled or unlabeled test compound was added to the hepatocyte suspensions to yield a final compound concentration of 1 µmol/L or lower in 0.5 × 106 viable cells/mL. After incubation, an 80-µL aliquot of the reaction mixture was serially removed at designated time points and dispensed into a centrifuge tube containing 50 µL of 2 mol/L NaOH (for radiolabeled compounds) or 5 mol/L ammonium acetate (for unlabeled compounds) under a layer of 100 µL of silicon/mineral oil (silicon oil/mineral oil = 1/0.184, w/w), followed by centrifugation (Microfuge 16; Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA) to separate hepatocytes from KHB. The compound taken up into hepatocytes and
9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Molecular Pharmaceutics 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 10 of 38
remaining in KHB were quantified by liquid scintillation counting or LC-MS/MS. The time-course data were expressed as the uptake volume (Vd,uptake, µL/106 cells), which was obtained by dividing the amount of a compound taken up into hepatocytes (Xhep, pmol/106 cells) by the compound concentration in the incubation buffer (Cbuffer, µmol/L) at each time point.
LC-MS/MS Analysis. The unlabeled test compounds except for cerivastatin and irbesartan in the samples obtained from in vitro uptake studies were measured by LC-MS/MS under the conditions reported previously
7, 21
. LC-MS/MS analysis of cerivastatin and irbesartan was performed on Quattro
Premier mass spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA) with Alliance HT 2795 separation module (Waters). Liquid chromatography was performed using an Atlantis T3 column (3.0 µm, 2.1 mm i.d., 50 mm, Waters) at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. Distilled water containing 0.1% formic acid (solvent A) and acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid (solvent B) were used as the mobile phases, and the gradient program was as follows: 0% solvent B at 0 minute, linearly increasing to 80% over 3 minutes, further linearly increasing to 100% solvent B over the next 0.01 minutes, held at 100% solvent B for 1 minute. The column was equilibrated with initial mobile phase condition before each injection (injection volume, 10 µL). Analytes were ionized by electrospray ionization in a positive ion mode, and the selected ion monitoring transitions were 460.58>356.14 for cerivastatin and 429.81>179.78 for irbesartan.
Kinetic Analysis of Uptake into Transporter-transfected HEK293 Cells. In the uptake study in transporter-transfected HEK293 cells, transporter-mediated uptake of a test compound was calculated by subtracting the uptake in control-HEK from that in OATP1B1-, OATP1B3-, or OATP2B1-HEK. The following Michaelis-Menten equation was fitted to the concentration-dependent transporter-mediated uptake data to calculate kinetic parameters:
=
×
(1)
10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 11 of 38 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Molecular Pharmaceutics
where v, S, Vmax, and Km represent uptake rate of the substrate (pmol/min/mg protein), substrate concentration in the incubation buffer (µmol/L), maximum uptake rate (pmol/min/mg protein), and Michaelis constant (µmol/L), respectively. For the compounds which showed biphasic transporter-mediated uptake with low affinity (or apparently non-saturable) component at higher substrate concentration, the following equation was used for data fitting:
=
×
+ ×
(2)
where CLlow represents uptake clearance for the low affinity component of the transporter-mediated uptake. Data fitting was performed by a nonlinear least-squares regression method by using MULTI program 22. For the compounds the kinetic parameters (Km, Vmax, and CLlow) of which were available, the initial uptake clearance (CLuptake, µL/min/mg protein) via OATP1B1 (CLuptake,1B1) and/or OATP1B3 (CLuptake,1B3) in transporter-transfected HEK293 cells was calculated as follows:
=
(3)
or
=
+
(4)
For the compounds the uptake of which was not adequately greater in OATP1B3-HEK than that in control-HEK to calculate kinetic parameters, the CLuptake,1B3 was calculated from the initial uptake slope of transporter-mediated uptake obtained from the time-course data.
Kinetic Analysis of Uptake into Cryopreserved Human Hepatocytes. In the uptake study in human hepatocyte suspensions, the intrinsic uptake clearance (PSinf) of a test compound obtained at 37°C (PSinf,37°C) and on ice (PSinf,ice) was calculated as follows, according to a previous report 6: ()
!""# ()
= $%&' ×
()(*+,),
!""#
!""# ()
+ ./
(5)
where Xhep(t), Cbuffer(t), AUC(0-t),buffer, and V0 represent the amount of a test compound taken up into hepatocytes at time t, the compound concentration in the incubation buffer at time t, the area under the compound concentration-time curve from zero time to time t in the incubation buffer, and the 11
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Molecular Pharmaceutics 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
initial
distribution
volume,
respectively.
The
Xhep(t)/Cbuffer(t)
Page 12 of 38
was
plotted
against
AUC(0-t),buffer/Cbuffer(t), and PSinf was determined from the initial slope of the plots. Transporter-mediated active uptake clearance in human hepatocytes (PSinf,act) was defined by the following equation in the present study:
$%&',0 = $%&',12° − $%&',%0
(6)
RAF Method. According to a previous report 12, relative activity factor (RAF) values were calculated by using E1S and CCK-8 as reference substrates for OATP1B1 and OATP1B3, respectively.
567898 =
: ;C mutation in SLCO1B1 is associated with a higher AUC of OATP1B substrate drugs, such as atorvastatin, pitavastatin, and pravastatin
3
. Compared with
previously-reported RAF approach findings, the observed contribution of OATP1B1 for pitavastatin (90%–98%) and irbesartan (94%–99%) was in agreement with previously-reported values (88%– 95% and 71%–98%, respectively)
12, 18
. The present study yielded a slightly higher contribution of
OATP1B1 for rosuvastatin (95%–99%) and valsartan (77%–95%) than that obtained in previous studies (66%–84% and 22%–71%, respectively)
14-15
. This was mainly attributable to interbatch
differences in the relative contribution of OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 because the PSinf,act ratio of E1S to CCK-8 observed in the present study (20.6 for lot VRR, 50.4 for lot OJE) was equivalent to or greater than that observed in previous batches used for rosuvastatin (13.9–38.3) and valsartan (1.4–
17
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Molecular Pharmaceutics 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 18 of 38
12.4) 14-15. Realizing the (i) strong correlation between human hepatocyte PSinf,act and CLint,all,vivo for OATP1B substrates and (ii) the major contribution of OATP1B1 in the hepatic uptake of the tested substrates prompted us to examine the performance of the RAF approach to directly correlate CLuptake in the OATP1B1-HEK cells with CLint,all,vivo for IVIVE purposes as follows: A;C) of SLCO1B1 on the clinical PK profile of fexofenadine the marked effect of rifampicin, simultaneously administered with fexofenadine
30
29
, and also by
. In addition, the
PSinf,act of telmisartan in human hepatocytes, which was as high as that of pitavastain, could not be predicted by the RAF approach due to the undetectable levels of OATP1B1- and OATP1B3-mediated transport (Figures 1 and 3). Since OATP1B3-mediated uptake was reportedly evident in the presence of albumin in the incubation buffer
31
, we performed an additional cellular
uptake study for telmisartan in the presence of BSA (Figure 6). Nevertheless, the OATP1B3- (or OATP1B1)-mediated uptake of telmisartan could not be detected in our expression systems. During this additional study, we clearly observed OATP2B1-mediated uptake of telmisartan in our overexpression systems (Figure 6), which was much greater than the previous report 31. Based on the REF method, we concluded that the contribution of OATP2B1 was marginal in that previous report. The discrepancy suggests the need to re-evaluate the contribution of OATP1B3 and OATP2B1 to the hepatic uptake of telmisartan in human hepatocytes. We also need to establish a method for distinguishing OATP2B1-mediated uptake from the net uptake in hepatocytes. The number of OATP1B substrates are increasing. In the most recent cases, direct-acting antivirals for treating the hepatitis C virus infection, such as asunaprevir and simeprevir, are OATP1B substrates 4, 32, whereas first generation antivirals such as telaprevir and boceprevir are not. Therefore, during the nonclinical drug development process, the pharmaceutical industry may have more opportunities to handle OATP1B substrate leads because of the broad substrate specificity of OATP1B. This study provides successful extrapolation of the low to high clearance of OATP1B substrates from the overexpression system to human hepatocytes, and also to in vivo. Further efforts are necessary to allow the RAF approach to avoid underestimation (by including other transporters
19
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Molecular Pharmaceutics 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
in the analysis), and to increase the accuracy of CLint,all,vivo prediction. Since the RAF approach is a knowledge-intensive approach, inclusion of other transporters could improve future predictive performance. The RAF approach can be used to predict active uptake clearance of OATP1B substrates in human hepatocytes. This quantitative bridging of transporter-mediated uptake clearance between different in vitro systems will allow for the earlier estimation of human hepatocyte PSinf,act, a fundamental parameter for predicting the human CLh of OATP1B substrates.
20
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 20 of 38
Page 21 of 38 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Molecular Pharmaceutics
Supporting Information. PSinf,37°C and PSinf,ice values of OATP1B substrate drugs in cryopreserved human hepatocyte suspensions; Time profiles of the uptake of [3H]E1S and [3H]CCK-8 in cryopreserved human hepatocytes, lots VRR (pool of 50 donors) and OJE (a single donor); Time profiles of the uptake of OATP1B substrate drugs in cryopreserved human hepatocyte suspensions (lot OJE, single donor); Prediction of clinically-observed CLint,all,vivo of OATP1B substrate drugs from OATP1B1-HEK cells by the RAF approach.
21
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Molecular Pharmaceutics 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
References 1.
Chu, X.; Bleasby, K.; Evers, R., Species differences in drug transporters and implications for
translating preclinical findings to humans. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology 2013, 9 (3), 237-252. 2.
Martignoni, M.; Groothuis, G. M. M.; de Kanter, R., Species differences between mouse, rat,
dog, monkey and human CYP-mediated drug metabolism, inhibition and induction. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology 2006, 2 (6), 875-894. 3.
Maeda, K., Organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP)1B1 and OATP1B3 as important
regulators of the pharmacokinetics of substrate drugs. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 2015, 38 (2), 155-168. 4.
Talavera Pons, S.; Boyer, A.; Lamblin, G.; Chennell, P.; Châtenet, F.-T.; Nicolas, C.; Sautou,
V.; Abergel, A., Managing drug–drug interactions with new direct-acting antiviral agents in chronic hepatitis C. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2017, 83 (2), 269-293. 5.
Watanabe, T.; Kusuhara, H.; Maeda, K.; Shitara, Y.; Sugiyama, Y., Physiologically based
pharmacokinetic modeling to predict transporter-mediated clearance and distribution of pravastatin in humans. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 2009, 328 (2), 652-662. 6.
Watanabe, T.; Kusuhara, H.; Maeda, K.; Kanamaru, H.; Saito, Y.; Hu, Z.; Sugiyama, Y.,
Investigation of the rate-determining process in the hepatic elimination of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in rats and humans. Drug Metabolism and Disposition 2010, 38 (2), 215-222. 7.
Izumi, S.; Nozaki, Y.; Komori, T.; Takenaka, O.; Maeda, K.; Kusuhara, H.; Sugiyama, Y.,
Comparison of the predictability of human hepatic clearance for organic anion transporting polypeptide substrate drugs between different in vitro-in vivo extrapolation approaches. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2017, 106 (9), 2678-2687. 8.
Crespi, C. L., Xenobiotic metabolising human cells as tools for pharmacological and
toxicological research. Advances in Drug Research 1995, 26, 179-235. 9.
Siu, Y. A.; Lai, W. G., Impact of probe substrate selection on cytochrome P450 reaction
phenotyping using the relative activity factor. Drug Metabolism and Disposition 2017, 45 (2), 183-189. 10.
Stringer, R. A.; Strain-Damerell, C.; Nicklin, P.; Houston, J. B., Evaluation of recombinant
cytochrome P450 enzymes as an in vitro system for metabolic clearance predictions. Drug Metabolism
22
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 22 of 38
Page 23 of 38 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Molecular Pharmaceutics
and Disposition 2009, 37 (5), 1025-1034. 11.
Hasegawa, M.; Kusuhara, H.; Endou, H.; Sugiyama, Y., Contribution of organic anion
transporters to the renal uptake of anionic compounds and nucleoside derivatives in rat. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 2003, 305 (3), 1087-1097. 12.
Hirano, M.; Maeda, K.; Shitara, Y.; Sugiyama, Y., Contribution of OATP2 (OATP1B1) and
OATP8 (OATP1B3) to the hepatic uptake of pitavastatin in humans. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 2004, 311 (1), 139-146. 13.
Maeda, K.; Ieiri, I.; Yasuda, K.; Fujino, A.; Fujiwara, H.; Otsubo, K.; Hirano, M.; Watanabe, T.;
Kitamura, Y.; Kusuhara, H.; Sugiyama, Y., Effects of organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1 haplotype on pharmacokinetics of pravastatin, valsartan, and temocapril. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2006, 79 (5), 427-439. 14.
Yamashiro, W.; Maeda, K.; Hirouchi, M.; Adachi, Y.; Hu, Z.; Sugiyama, Y., Involvement of
transporters in the hepatic uptake and biliary excretion of valsartan, a selelctive antagonist of the angiotensin II AT1-receptor, in humans. Drug Metabolism and Disposition 2006, 34 (7), 1247-1254. 15.
Kitamura, S.; Maeda, K.; Wang, Y.; Sugiyama, Y., Involvement of multiple transporters in the
hepatobiliary transport of rosuvastatin. Drug Metabolism and Disposition 2008, 36 (10), 2014-2023. 16.
Imamura, Y.; Murayama, N.; Okudaira, N.; Kurihara, A.; Okazaki, O.; Izumi, T.; Inoue, K.;
Yuasa, H.; Kusuhara, H.; Sugiyama, Y., Prediction of fluoroquinolone-induced elevation in serum creatinine levels: a case of drug–endogenous substance interaction involving the inhibition of renal secretion. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2011, 89 (1), 81-88. 17.
Kunze, A.; Huwyler, J.; Camenisch, G.; Poller, B., Prediction of organic anion-transporting
polypeptide 1B1- and 1B3-mediated hepatic uptake of statins based on transporter protein expression and activity data. Drug Metabolism and Disposition 2014, 42 (9), 1514-1521. 18.
Chapy, H.; Klieber, S.; Brun, P.; Gerbal-Chaloin, S.; Boulenc, X.; Nicolas, O., PBPK modeling
of irbesartan: incorporation of hepatic uptake. Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition 2015, 36 (8), 491-506. 19.
Izumi, S.; Nozaki, Y.; Komori, T.; Maeda, K.; Takenaka, O.; Kusano, K.; Yoshimura, T.;
Kusuhara, H.; Sugiyama, Y., Substrate-dependent inhibition of organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1: comparative analysis with prototypical probe substrates estradiol-17β-glucuronide, estrone-3-sulfate,
23
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Molecular Pharmaceutics 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
and sulfobromophthalein. Drug Metabolism and Disposition 2013, 41 (10), 1859-1866. 20.
Izumi, S.; Nozaki, Y.; Komori, T.; Takenaka, O.; Maeda, K.; Kusuhara, H.; Sugiyama, Y.,
Investigation of fluorescein derivatives as substrates of organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1 to develop sensitive fluorescence-based OATP1B1 inhibition assays. Molecular Pharmaceutics 2016, 13 (2), 438-448. 21.
Izumi, S.; Nozaki, Y.; Maeda, K.; Komori, T.; Takenaka, O.; Kusuhara, H.; Sugiyama, Y.,
Investigation of the impact of substrate selection on in vitro organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1 inhibition profiles for the prediction of drug-drug Interactions. Drug Metabolism and Disposition 2015, 43 (2), 235-247. 22.
Yamaoka, K.; Tanigawara, Y.; Nakagawa, T.; Uno, T., A pharmacokinetic analysis program
(multi) for microcomputer. Journal of Pharmacobio-dynamics 1981, 4 (11), 879-885. 23.
Ho, R. H.; Leake, B. F.; Roberts, R. L.; Lee, W.; Kim, R. B., Ethnicity-dependent
Polymorphism in Na+-taurocholate Cotransporting Polypeptide (SLC10A1) Reveals a Domain Critical for Bile Acid Substrate Recognition. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2004, 279 (8), 7213-7222. 24.
Roth, M.; Obaidat, A.; Hagenbuch, B., OATPs, OATs and OCTs: the organic anion and cation
transporters of the SLCO and SLC22A gene superfamilies. British Journal of Pharmacology 2012, 165 (5), 1260-1287. 25.
Bi, Y.-a.; Scialis, R. J.; Lazzaro, S.; Mathialagan, S.; Kimoto, E.; Keefer, J.; Zhang, H.;
Vildhede, A. M.; Costales, C.; Rodrigues, A. D.; Tremaine, L. M.; Varma, M. V. S., Reliable Rate Measurements for Active and Passive Hepatic Uptake Using Plated Human Hepatocytes. The AAPS Journal 2017, 19 (3), 787-796. 26.
Williamson, B.; Soars, A. C.; Owen, A.; White, P.; Riley, R. J.; Soars, M. G., Dissecting the
relative contribution of OATP1B1-mediated uptake of xenobiotics into human hepatocytes using siRNA. Xenobiotica 2013, 43 (10), 920-931. 27.
Ismair, M. G.; Stieger, B.; Cattori, V.; Hagenbuch, B.; Fried, M.; Meier, P. J.; Kullak-Ublick, G.
A., Hepatic uptake of cholecystokinin octapeptide by organic anion-transporting polypeptides OATP4 and OATP8 of rat and human liver. Gastroenterology 2001, 121 (5), 1185-1190. 28.
Mathialagan, S.; Piotrowski, M. A.; Tess, D. A.; Feng, B.; Litchfield, J.; Varma, M. V.,
Quantitative prediction of human renal clearance and drug-drug interactions of organic anion transporter
24
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 24 of 38
Page 25 of 38 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Molecular Pharmaceutics
substrates using in vitro transport data: a relative activity factor approach. Drug Metabolism and Disposition 2017, 45 (4), 409-417. 29.
Niemi, M.; Kivistö, K. T.; Hofmann, U.; Schwab, M.; Eichelbaum, M.; Fromm, M. F.,
Fexofenadine pharmacokinetics are associated with a polymorphism of the SLCO1B1 gene (encoding OATP1B1). British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2005, 59 (5), 602-604. 30.
Kusuhara, H.; Miura, M.; Yasui-Furukori, N.; Yoshida, K.; Akamine, Y.; Yokochi, M.;
Fukizawa, S.; Ikejiri, K.; Kanamitsu, K.; Uno, T.; Sugiyama, Y., Effect of coadministration of single and multiple doses of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of fexofenadine enantiomers in healthy subjects. Drug Metabolism and Disposition 2013, 41 (1), 206-213. 31.
Ishiguro, N.; Maeda, K.; Kishimoto, W.; Saito, A.; Harada, A.; Ebner, T.; Roth, W.; Igarashi, T.;
Sugiyama, Y., Predominant contribution of OATP1B3 to the hepatic uptake of telmisartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, in humans. Drug Metabolism and Disposition 2006, 34 (7), 1109-1115. 32.
Eley, T.; Han, Y. H.; Huang, S. P.; He, B.; Li, W.; Bedford, W.; Stonier, M.; Gardiner, D.; Sims,
K.; Rodrigues, A. D.; Bertz, R. J., Organic anion transporting polypeptide-mediated transport of, and inhibition by, asunaprevir, an inhibitor of hepatitis C virus NS3 protease. Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics 2015, 97 (2), 159-66.
25
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Molecular Pharmaceutics 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47
Page 26 of 38
Tables Table 1. RAF values for OATP1B1 and OATP1B3
Isoform
Reference substrate
Human hepatocytes
Transporter-transfected cell systems
Lot VRR
Km
Vmax
CLuptake,1B1,E1S
CLuptake,1B3,CCK-8
PSinf,act
(µmol/L)
(pmol/min/mg)
(µL/min/mg)
(µL/min/mg)
(µL/min/106 cells)
Lot OJE RAF
OATP1B1
E1 S
0.286a
36.4a
127
-
200 ± 57b
1.57
OATP1B3
CCK-8
5.77c (5.23, 6.30)
84.9c (75.0, 94.8)
-
14.6
9.72c (8.12, 11.3)
0.661
-, not applicable. a: Izumi et al. (2013) b: Mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments. c: Mean of 2 independent experiments with individual values given in the parenthesis.
26
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
PSinf,act (µL/min/106 cells) 464c (463, 466) 9.21c (8.63, 9.77)
RAF
3.65 0.627
Page 27 of 38 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47
Molecular Pharmaceutics
Table 2. OATP1B1- and OATP1B3-mediated uptake of OATP1B substrate drugs in transporter-transfected HEK293 cells Test compounds
OATP1B1
OATP1B3
Km (µmol/L)
Vmax (pmol/min/mg)
CLlow (µL/min/mg)
CLuptake,1B1 (µL/min/mg)
0.761b
42.2b
-b
55.5c
4.27b 1.13 (0.857, 1.41)a
56.1b 87.7 (73.9, 101)a
-b
13.1c
-
77.6c
Fexofenadine
61.6b
41.0b
0.0199b
0.685c
Fluvastatin Glibenclamide
87.6b 38.1b 127 (116, 139)a 174b
-b 0.507b
Nateglinide
4.80b 1.24b 4.73 (3.84, 5.62)a 36.4b
Pitavastatin
2.48b
Pravastatin Rosuvastatin Telmisartan
Atorvastatin Bosentan Cerivastatin
Irbesartan
Vmax (pmol/min/mg) 16.8 (21.6, 12.0)a 7.07 (6.85, 7.29)a 9.00 (5.24, 12.8)a -
CLlow (µL/min/mg) 0.595 (1.05, 0.143)a 0.797 (0.958, 0.637)a
CLuptake,1B3 (µL/min/mg)
-
0.625c
18.3c 31.2c
Km (µmol/L) 0.923 (0.799, 1.05)a 1.43 (1.29, 1.57)a 14.4 (9.49, 19.2)a -
-
2.89 ± 0.42d 2.65 ± 0.82d
-
26.8c
-
-
-
4.28 ± 0.76d
-b
4.78c
0.632b
46.6c
27.0b 9.31b
187b 103b
-b 0.624b
6.93c 11.7c
27.6 (25.2, 30.0)a -
0.649 (0.972, 0.326)a -
1.97 ± 0.22d
114b
2.43 (1.77, 3.10)a -
0.859 ± 0.161d 1.33 ± 0.26d
-
-
-
ND
-
-
-
ND
13.6 (9.85, 17.3)a
54.9 (60.5, 49.3)a
-
0.344 ± 0.104d
-
4.04c
b
b
b
c
Torasemide
20.9
154
0.908
8.28
Valsartan
7.48b
42.3b
0.0545b
5.71c
18.8c 2.99 ± 0.15d 5.74c
12.0c
-, not applicable; ND, not detected. a: Kinetic parameters of test compounds for OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 obtained from transporter-transfected cells in the present study are expressed as mean ± SEM (n=3 or 4), or mean of 2 independent experiments with individual data given in a parenthesis. b: Izumi et al. (2015). c: CLuptake,1B1 or CLuptake,1B3 was calculated by using mean kinetic parameters according to Equation 3 or 4.
27
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Molecular Pharmaceutics 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47
d: CLuptake,1B3 calculated from the initial slope of time course of OATP1B3-mediatd uptake is expressed as mean ± SEM of 3 to 4 independent experiments. The substrate concentrations (µmol/L) used are as follows: 0.1 for bosentan, glibenclamide, and irbesartan, 0.3 for fluvastatin, 1 for nateglinide, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, and torasemide.
28
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 28 of 38
Page 29 of 38 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47
Molecular Pharmaceutics
Table 3. Uptake clearance in cryopreserved human hepatocytes and RAF-based OATP1B1- and OATP1B3-mediated uptake clearance
Uptake clearance in human hepatocytes Lot VRR Lot OJE Test compounds
Atorvastatin
RAF1B1× CLuptake,1B1 (1B1 contribution)b
Compound concentration
PSinf,acta
(µmol/L) 0.1
(µL/min/106 cells) 73.7 173
87.1 (87.5%)
RAF-based OATP1B- and OATP1B3-mediated uptake clearance Lot VRR Lot OJE RAF1B1× RAF1B3× RAF1B3× CLuptake,1B3 CLuptake,1B1+1B3,RAFd (1B3 contribution)c (µL/min/106 cells) 12.4 (12.5%) 99.5
CLuptake,1B1 (1B1 contribution)b 318 (97.6%)
CLuptake,1B3 CLuptake,1B1+1B3,RAFd (1B3 contribution)c (µL/min/106 cells) 7.76 (2.4%) 326
Bosentan
0.1
30.6
56.4
20.6 (91.2%)
1.98 (8.8%)
22.6
75.2 (98.4%)
1.24 (1.6%)
Cerivastatin
0.1
81.7
166
122 (97.0%)
3.79 (3.0%)
126
445 (99.5%)
2.37 (0.5%)
447
Fexofenadine
1
10.9
11.2
1.08 (72.3%)
0.413 (27.7%)
1.49
3.94 (93.8%)
0.259 (6.2%)
4.20
Fluvastatin
0.3
91.2
225
28.7 (93.8%)
1.91 (6.2%)
30.6
105 (98.9%)
1.20 (1.1%)
106
Glibenclamide
0.1
83.1
175
49.0 (96.6%)
1.75 (3.4%)
50.8
179 (99.4%)
1.10 (0.6%)
180
Irbesartan
0.3
82.7
89.0
42.1 (93.7%)
2.83 (6.3%)
44.9
154 (98.9%)
1.77 (1.1%)
156
Nateglinide
1
9.92
37.4
7.50 (85.2%)
1.30 (14.8%)
8.80
27.4 (97.1%)
0.814 (2.9%)
28.2
Pitavastatin
0.3
143
307
73.2 (90.2%)
7.93 (9.8%)
81.1
267 (98.2%)
4.96 (1.8%)
272
76.4
Pravastatin
1
3.39
16.8
10.9 (95.0%)
0.568 (5.0%)
11.5
39.8 (99.1%)
0.356 (0.9%)
40.2
Rosuvastatin
1
12.0
38.3
18.4 (95.4%)
0.879 (4.6%)
19.3
67.2 (99.2%)
0.550 (0.8%)
67.8
Telmisartan
0.05
256
197
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Torasemide
1
9.66
26.2
13.0 (98.3%)
0.227 (1.7%)
13.2
47.5 (99.7%)
0.142 (0.3%)
47.6
Valsartan
1
8.28
16.0
8.96 (77.0%)
2.67 (23.0%)
11.6
32.7 (95.1%)
1.67 (4.9%)
34.4
NA, not applicable because OATP1B1- and OATP1B3-mediated uptake of telmisartan was not observed in transporter-transfected HEK293 cells in this study. a: PSinf,act of test compounds in two batches of human hepatocytes (lots VRR and OJE) was calculated according to Equation 6 by using PSinf,37°C and PSinf,ice values (Table S1). b: 1B1 contribution (%) = RAF1B1 × CLuptake,1B1/(RAF1B1 × CLuptake,1B1 + RAF1B3 × CLuptake,1B3) × 100 c: 1B3 contribution (%) = RAF1B3 × CLuptake,1B3/(RAF1B1 × CLuptake,1B1 + RAF1B3 × CLuptake,1B3) × 100 d: CLuptake,1B1+1B3,RAF = RAF1B1 × CLuptake,1B1 + RAF1B3 × CLuptake,1B3
29
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Molecular Pharmaceutics 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Figure Captions Figure 1. Time profiles of the uptake of [3H]CCK-8 and OATP1B substrate drugs in OATP1B3- and control-HEK. Uptake of [3H]CCK-8 (A, 0.001 µmol/L), atorvastatin (B, 0.1 µmol/L), bosentan (C, 0.1 µmol/L), cerivastatin (D, 0.1 µmol/L), fexofenadine (E, 1 µmol/L), fluvastatin (F, 0.3 µmol/L), glibenclamide (G, 0.1 µmol/L), irbesartan (H, 0.1 µmol/L), nateglinide (I, 1 µmol/L), pitavastatin (J, 0.1 µmol/L), pravastatin (K, 1 µmol/L), rosuvastatin (L, 1 µmol/L), telmisartan (M, 0.05 µmol/L), torasemide (N, 1 µmol/L), and valsartan (O, 1 µmol/L) in OATP1B3-HEK (closed circles) and control-HEK (open circles) cells was examined over a period of 10 (telmisartan) or 30 (other compounds) minutes at 37°C. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n=3).
Figure 2. Concentration dependence of the OATP1B3-mediated uptake of [3H]CCK-8 (A, 0.001 – 100 µmol/L), atorvastatin (B, 0.03 – 30 µmol/L), cerivastatin (C, 0.03 – 30 µmol/L), fexofenadine (D, 0.1 – 100 µmol/L), pitavastatin (E, 0.1 – 100 µmol/L), and valsartan (F, 0.5 – 100 µmol/L). OATP1B3-mediated uptake was calculated by subtracting the uptake in control-HEK from that in OATP1B3-HEK, and the uptake was determined for 0.5 (atorvastatin and pitavastatin), 2 (valsartan and cerivastatin), or 5 (CCK-8 and fexofenadine) minutes at 37°C. Representative data from two independent experiments are shown as Eadie-Hofstee plot, in which OATP1B3-mediated uptake clearance (v/s, µL/min/mg protein, Y-axis) is plotted against the uptake rate (v, pmol/min/mg protein, X-axis). Each point represents mean ± SEM (n=3), and fitted lines (solid lines) were obtained by a nonlinear least-squares regression according to Equation 1 or 2 given under Materials and Methods.
Figure 3. Time profiles and concentration dependence of OATP1B1-mediated uptake of cerivastatin, irbesartan, and telmisartan. The uptake of cerivastatin (A, 1 µmol/L), irbesartan (B, 1 µmol/L), and telmisartan (C, 0.05 µmol/L) was examined in OATP1B1-HEK (closed circles) and control-HEK (open circles) cells for a period of 10 minutes at 37°C. Concentration dependence of OATP1B1-mediated uptake of cerivastatin (D, 0.01 – 10 µmol/L) and irbesartan (E, 0.03 – 30 µmol/L). OATP1B1-mediated uptake was calculated by subtracting the uptake in control-HEK from 30
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 30 of 38
Page 31 of 38 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Molecular Pharmaceutics
that in OATP1B1-HEK, and the uptake was determined for 0.5 minutes at 37°C. Representative data from two independent experiments are shown as Eadie-Hofstee plot, in which OATP1B1-mediated uptake clearance (v/s, µL/min/mg protein, Y-axis) is plotted against the uptake rate (v, pmol/min/mg protein, X-axis). The fitted lines (solid lines) were obtained by a nonlinear least-squares regression according to Equation 1 given under Materials and Methods. Each point represents mean ± SEM (n=3).
Figure 4.
Time profiles of the uptake of OATP1B substrate drugs in cryopreserved human
hepatocyte suspensions (lot VRR, pool of 50 donors). Uptake of atorvastatin (A, 0.1 µmol/L), bosentan (B, 0.1 µmol/L), cerivastatin (C, 0.1 µmol/L), fluvastatin (D, 0.3 µmol/L), glibenclamide (E, 0.1 µmol/L), irbesartan (F, 0.3 µmol/L), pitavastatin (G, 0.3 µmol/L), and telmisartan (H, 0.05 µmol/L) was determined at 37°C (closed circles) and on ice (open circles) up to 5 minutes by using an oil-spin method. The uptake value (µL/106 cells) was determined by dividing the amount of a compound taken up into human hepatocytes by the compound concentration in the incubation buffer at each time point. Representative 5-minute time course data from 2 to 7 independent experiments are presented. Each symbol represents mean of duplicate samples.
Figure 5. Comparison of RAF-based net uptake clearance mediated by OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 with human hepatocyte uptake clearance. The net uptake clearance mediated by OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 predicted from transfected cell systems by RAF approach (CLuptake,1B1+1B3,RAF = RAF1B1 × CLuptake,1B1 + RAF1B3 × CLuptake,1B3, X-axis) was compared with observed human hepatocyte active uptake clearance (PSinf,act = PSinf,37°C – PSinf,ice, Y-axis) in lots VRR (A) and OJE (B). Each symbol represents a mean value, and solid and dashed lines represent 1 to 1 and 1 to 3 (or 3 to 1) correlation lines, respectively. 1, atorvastatin; 2, bosentan; 3, cerivastatin; 4, fexofenadine; 5, fluvastatin; 6, glibenclamide; 7, irbesartan; 8, nateglinide; 9, pitavastatin; 10, pravastatin; 11, rosuvastatin; 12, torasemide; 13, valsartan. Telmisartan was excluded from the plots because the OATP1B1- and OATP1B3-mediate uptake was not observed in transporter-transfected HEK293 cell systems in the 31
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Molecular Pharmaceutics 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
present study.
Figure 6. Uptake of telmisartan in OATP1B1-, OATP1B3-, OATP2B1-HEK, and control-HEK cells in the presence of 0.25% (A) and 1% (B) BSA in the incubation buffer. The cells were incubated with KHB containing telmisartan (1 µmol/L) and BSA (0.25% or 1%) for 5 minutes at 37°C. The uptake was calculated by dividing the amount of telmisartan in the cells by total concentration of telmisartan (1 µmol/L) in the incubation buffer. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM (n=3). ***P < 0.001 between transporter-transfected HEK and control-HEK cells (one-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test). Time profiles of telmisartan uptake (0.05 µmol/L) in OATP2B1-HEK (closed circles) and control-HEK cells (open circles) for a period of 10 minutes at 37°C in KHB without BSA (C). Concentration dependence of the OATP2B1-mediated uptake of telmisartan (D). OATP2B1-mediated uptake of telmisartan (0.005 – 20 µmol/L) was calculated by subtracting the uptake in control-HEK from that in OATP2B1-HEK cells, and the uptake was determined for 1 minute at 37°C in KHB without BSA. Representative data from two independent experiments are shown as Eadie-Hofstee plot, in which OATP2B1-mediated uptake clearance (v/s, µL/min/mg protein, Y-axis) is plotted against the uptake rate (v, pmol/min/mg protein, X-axis). The fitted lines (solid lines) were obtained by a nonlinear least-squares regression according to Equation 1 given under Materials and Methods. Each point represents mean ± SEM (n=3).
32
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 32 of 38
Page 33 of 38 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Molecular Pharmaceutics
Illustrations: Figures Figure 1
33
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Molecular Pharmaceutics 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Figure 2
34
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 34 of 38
Page 35 of 38 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Molecular Pharmaceutics
Figure 3
35
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Molecular Pharmaceutics 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Figure 4
36
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 36 of 38
Page 37 of 38 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Molecular Pharmaceutics
Figure 5
37
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Molecular Pharmaceutics 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Figure 6
38
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 38 of 38