Subscriber access provided by Washington University | Libraries
Article
Rapid and Non-Destructive Determination of Aleurone Content in Pearling Fractions of Barley by NIR and Fluorescence Spectroscopy Jens Petter Wold, Diego Airado-Rodríguez, Ann Katrin Holtekjolen, Ulla Riikka Maria Holopainen-Mantila, and Stefan Sahlstrom J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b04954 • Publication Date (Web): 07 Feb 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on February 7, 2017
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1
Rapid and Non-Destructive Determination of Aleurone Content in
2
Pearling Fractions of Barley by NIR and Fluorescence Spectroscopy
3
Jens Petter Wold†*, Diego Airado-Rodríguez†, Ann-Katrin Holtekjølen†, Ulla Holopainen-
4
Mantila‡, Stefan Sahlstrøm†
5 6
† – Nofima AS, Norwegian Institute for Food and Fisheries Research, Tromsø, Norway
7
‡ – VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland
8
Diego Airado (
[email protected]);
[email protected];
9
[email protected]; Holopainen-Mantila Ulla (
[email protected])
10
11
*Corresponding author (Tel: +47 95979749; Fax: +47 64940333; E-mail:
12
[email protected])
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
21
Abstract
22
The aim of the present work was to develop and evaluate near-infrared (NIR) and
23
fluorescence spectroscopy as rapid and potential on-line methods for determination of the
24
amount of aleurone in pearling dust fractions of barley. Phytic acid was used as marker for the
25
aleurone layer. Different varieties of barley were pearled and dust fractions were
26
progressively taken out. Sample concentration of phytic acid varied in the range 0.5 – 4.1
27
g/100g and highest concentrations were obtained in dust fractions for pearling degrees in the
28
range 15 - 25%. Regression models for phytic acid were developed with the same high
29
correlations for NIR and fluorescence spectroscopy (R2=0.96) and prediction errors of ±0.16 –
30
0.18 g/100g. The models performed well on a test set of pearling fractions from two other
31
barley varieties. The techniques are rapid and non-destructive, which means that they can be
32
used on-line in connection with industrial pearling systems.
33
34
2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 33
Page 3 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
35
Introduction
36
Currently, barley processing mainly consists of de-hulling, pearling and then milling to a
37
flour. De-hulling removes the hull and also portions of the pericarp and testa. Pearling the de-
38
hulled barley grains further removes the remaining hull, pericarp and testa, aleurone layers
39
and germ.1 De-hulling and pearling are accomplished by abrasion, which subjects the grains
40
to a rotating abrasive surface. Pearled barley typically makes up 60-70% of the total grain
41
weight,2 while the byproduct, the pearling flour (30-40%), is mainly used for animal feeds.
42
This process is difficult to optimize to increase process yield, that is, obtain as much flour as
43
possible with a minimum or a desired amount of fractions from the outer layers. Different
44
properties of the barley grains, for instance different varieties, requires different pearling
45
percentages to achieve high quality flour and a minimum of byproduct. Practice is to adjust
46
the pearling process according to experience or habit. Optimization of pearled barley yield
47
and barley flour quality can, however, be solved by establishment of a rapid online method for
48
monitoring of the pearling dust composition. Such measurements could also be used to detect
49
and quantify particularly nutritional pearling fractions for better utilisation. In this study we
50
focussed on the determination of aleurone content in the pearling dust.
51 52
Barley is known to contain certain health components. The aleurone layer is composed mainly
53
of arabinoxylans (67 – 71%) and beta-glucans (26%) as well as phenolic acids, vitamin E, B-
54
vitamins, protein, triacylglycerol, minerals, phytate and sugars.3 The phenolic compounds
55
such as ferulic acid after uptake in the gut, are transported to the blood and can possibly help
56
to reduce the destructive effect of free radicals.4 Barley is also rich in beta-glucan, a
57
polysaccharide building block of the cell walls in aleurone layer and the endosperm, which is
58
approved by EFSA to reduce the cholesterol level and sugar in blood after a meal.5
59
Holtekjølen et al.6 found that the pearling flour is a potential natural source of phytochemicals 3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
60
with antioxidant effects. Chemical characterization of different pearling fractions of barley
61
was done by Blandino et al.,7 who found that the total antioxidant activity (TAA) in the 15-
62
25% pearling fraction was significantly higher than in the other fractions. The inclusion of
63
this fraction in preparation of bread increased TAA and dietary fibers without impairing the
64
physical bread properties. For milling companies it can be important to be able to quantitate
65
the amount of kernel tissues and health promoting components in their milling fractions, for
66
example the content of hull, soluble fibre (β-glucan) and aleurone layer, and in that way create
67
a competitive advantage in terms of diversifying milling and bakery product ranges.
68
Ultimately, the consumers will benefit from a naturally produced healthier product.
69 70
Barron et al.8 isolated barley grain tissues from both hulled and hulless barley for chemical
71
analyses. They found that phytic acid is specifically localized in the aleurone layer and that it
72
can be used as a marker for this tissue among other grain tissues. They also identified the
73
phenolic compound p-Coumaric acid as an efficient marker of the hull and proposed that it
74
could be used to monitor the dehulling process.
75 76
In order to perform continuous product or process control, rapid analytical techniques are
77
required. Traditional chemical methods typically require several hours or days, and such a
78
time span is rarely applicable in modern production. Spectroscopic instrumentation has gained
79
popularity in processing industries during the last 2-3 decades, being rapid, reliable and non-
80
destructive analytical techniques. For online use in food production, near-infrared (NIR)
81
spectroscopy is probably the most widely used spectroscopic technique. The near infrared part
82
of the electromagnetic spectrum comprises overtones and combination bands of fundamental
83
bond vibrations found in the infrared region. The molecular bonds that absorb in the NIR
84
region are mainly -O-H, -C-H, -N-H and -S-H, reflecting molecular structural characteristics
4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 33
Page 5 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
85
of proteins, carbohydrates, lipids and water. NIR is established in the milling industry for at-
86
line and on-line determination of typically moisture, protein, fat and ash in flour and whole
87
grains. Promising results for determination of beta-glucan has been obtained.9 It is also
88
reported that phytic acid has a distinct absorption spectrum in the NIR region and that it can
89
be determined in green gram seeds and cotton seeds by NIR spectroscopy.10,11 NIR is
90
therefore a promising method for continuous monitoring of the pearling fractions, where the
91
amount of e.g. protein, beta-glucan and phytic acid will vary systematically through the
92
different kernel layers.7
93 94
It is well known that different tissues of the grains have characteristic fluorescent properties.
95
The strong bluish fluorescence from the aleurone layer comes mainly from ferulic acid.12
96
Jensen et al.13 showed that endosperm emits fluorescence in the UV typical for tryptophan,
97
and that pericarp has a distinct green-yellow fluorescence peaking at about 520 nm with
98
unknown origin. They also demonstrated that it is possible to quantitate the amount of
99
pericarp, aleurone, and endosperm in wheat milling fractions by the use of autofluorescence
100
spectra and multivariate calibration. The spectroscopic measurements were performed on 20
101
mg flour samples suspended in glycerol and water. Symons and Dexter14 used fluorescence
102
imaging in pilot mill streams to monitor aleurone and pericarp as an estimator of flour
103
refinement. Pericarp fluorescence correlated especially well with flour refinement and
104
indicated promise for on-line quality evaluation in mills.
105 106
The main aim of the present work was to develop and evaluate a rapid and preferably on-line
107
method for determination of the amount of aleurone layer in pearling fractions of barley. Such
108
a method could be used to control the pearling process toward maximum yield as well as
109
extract fractions with high aleurone content for use in certain products. We have tested and
5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
110
compared two rapid spectroscopic techniques, which both have potential for on-line use: NIR
111
and fluorescence spectroscopy. Different varieties of barley were pearled and dust fractions
112
were systematically taken out over time. As reference marker for the aleurone layer we used
113
phytic acid. Concentrations of different phenolic acids were also determined. Multivariate
114
regression as well as spectroscopic curve resolution were used to analyse the data and make
115
calibration models.
116 117 118
Materials and Methods
119
Materials
120
For the investigations, three separate sample sets of pearling dust were produced. The sample
121
sets were made as follows:
122
SampleSet1: A J.E. Barley Huller (Glenn.A. Burdick, Minneapolis, MN) pearler was used to
123
make 12 fractions each of two different barley varieties, 'Marigold' and 'Olve'. The pearler
124
consists of a wire brush that presses small particles through a sieve. A maximum of 20 grams
125
of grain could be pearled at the time. The dust fractions were made by collecting pearling dust
126
systematically according to time of pearling. The fractions were collected for 0-30, 30-60, 60-
127
90, and so on up to 330-360 s. A total of 24 samples were produced.
128
SampleSet2: A Testing Mill TM05 (Satake, Stafford, TX) with abrasive stone #30 was used to
129
make 9 fractions each from two parallels of 200 g of 'Marigold' kernels, and then 10 fractions
130
each of two 200 g parallels of 'Olve' kernels. A total of 38 samples were produced.
131
Progressive pearling fractions were taken out after approximate pearling degrees 9, 14, 18, 22,
132
26, 30, 33, 38, 42 and 49%.
6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 33
Page 7 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
133
SampleSet3: The same Satake Testing Mill TM05 was used to make 8 fractions each from two
134
parallels of 200 g of 'Pihl' kernels, and then 8 fractions each of two 200 g parallels of 'Pirona'
135
kernels. 'Pihl' and 'Pirona' are hulless barley varieties. A total of 32 samples were produced.
136
Progressive pearling fractions were taken out after approximate pearling degrees 5, 10, 15, 21,
137
26, 31, 36 and 40%.
138
Spectroscopic measurements
139
NIR spectra in reflection mode were obtained directly on intact dust samples with a DA7200
140
spectrometer (Perten Instruments, Hägersten, Sweden). Samples were disposed in a circular
141
sampling cup and measured area was approximately 30 cm2. Sampling time was set to 6 sec
142
and spectra were registered by covering every fifth wavelength in the region 950-1650 nm.
143
Each sample was measured in triplicate and the average spectrum was used for further
144
analysis.
145
Fluorescence spectra were also collected from the intact pearling dust samples. Samples were
146
placed in black circular sample cups, which exposed a flat circular surface with a diameter of
147
5 cm for the measurements. Measurements were carried out with a Fluoromax-4
148
spectrofluorometer (Horiba Scientific, Kyoto, Japan) in front face mode via a FL-300/FM4-
149
3000 bifurcated fiber-optic probe (Horiba Scientific). Distance between the probe head and
150
the sample was about 5 cm and created a circular measurement area of 40 mm diameter.
151
Probe and sample were covered by a black shield to avoid ambient straylight. Three different
152
excitation wavelengths were employed to register emission spectra of each sample. Samples
153
were sequentially illuminated with 470 nm, 350 nm and 280 nm excitation light and the
154
corresponding fluorescence emission spectra were registered in the ranges 490-650 nm, 400-
155
600 nm, and 300-540 nm, respectively. The three assayed excitation wavelengths were
156
systematically applied in decreasing order to minimize potential sample alteration by the UV
7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
157
excitation. The selected excitation wavelengths should enable detection of pericarp, aleurone
158
and endosperm, respectively.13,14
159
Determination of phytic acid
160
Phytic acid was used as a marker for the aleurone layer and was measured for all
161
samples. It was determined by means of a K-PHYT phytic acid (phytate)/total
162
phosphorus assay kit (Megazyme, Chicago, IL). This method involves acid extraction
163
of inositol phosphates followed by treatment with a phytase that is specific for phytic
164
acid (IP6) and the lower myo-inositol phosphate forms (i.e. IP2, IP3, IP4, IP5).
165
Subsequent treatment with alkaline phosphatase ensures the release of the final
166
phosphate from myo-inositol phosphate (IP1) which is relatively resistant to the action
167
of phytase. The total phosphate released is measured using a modified colourimetric
168
method and given as g of phosphorus/100 g of sample material.
169 170
Determination of phenolic acids
171
Total phenolic acids (ferulic acid, caffeic acid, p-coumaric acid and sinapic acid) were
172
determined for four series of pearling fractions, one from each of 'Olve', 'Marigold',
173
'Pihl' and 'Pirona'. Extraction of total phenolic acids was performed as described
174
earlier.15 Identification and quantitation of phenolic acids were carried out using a
175
UltiMate 3000 rapid separation high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)
176
system with a 3000 RS diode array detector (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA) and an Acquity
177
UPLC BEH C8, 1.7 µm, 2.1 × 150 mm column (Waters, Milford, MA). A gradient
178
elution program was used with 1% acetic acid in Milli-Q water as eluent A and 1%
179
acetic acid in acetonitrile as eluent B. The injection volume was 10 µL, and the flow
180
rate was 0.450 mL/min, with a column temperature of 50 °C. The gradient elution
181
program was as follows: 5% B (0 min), 5% B (0.8 min), 10% B (1.2 min), 10% B (1.9 8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 33
Page 9 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
182
min), 15% B (2.4 min), 15% B (3.7 min), 21% B (4.0 min), 21% B (5.2 min), 27% B
183
(5.7 min), 50% B (8.0 min), 100% B (9.0 min), 100% B (12.5 min), 5% B (15.0 min),
184
5% B (20.0 min). Initial conditions were used for 10 min equilibration before a new
185
analysis was started. The identification and quantitation of phenolic acids were carried
186
out using external standards (caffeic, p-coumaric, ferulic, and sinapic acid) and UV
187
spectrum characteristics with the Chromeleon chromatography information
188
management System (Dionex).16
189 190
Microscopy of pearled barley grains
191
Selected grains of cultivars 'Marigold', 'Olve', 'Pihl' and 'Pirona' representing various pearling
192
times were subjected to microscopy to evaluate the effect of pearling on the aleurone layer. A
193
quick staining method was developed for this examination of aleurone layer in pearled grains.
194
Grains were cut in half cross-sectionally in the middle of the grain. Cross-cut surfaces of
195
individual grains were stained with 0.1% (w/v) acid fuchsin (BDH Chemicals Ltd., Poole,
196
UK) in 1% acetic acid for 1 min and rinsed twice with water. Stained grains were then dried
197
in dark for 30 min. The cross-cut surfaces were imaged using excitation wavelength (330-
198
380 nm) and emission from 420 nm with an AxioImager M.2 microscope (Carl Zeiss GmbH,
199
Göttingen, Germany). Under these lightning conditions, aleurone cell walls were detected as
200
bright blue due to autofluorescence of phenolic substances present in cell walls while starchy
201
endosperm appeared bright red. Micrographs were obtained using a Zeiss Axiocam 506 CCD
202
colour camera (Zeiss) and the Zen imaging software (Zeiss). In addition to epifluorescence
203
microscopy, the grains were imaged using a SteREO Discovery.V8 stereomicroscope
204
equipped with Achromat S 0.5x objective (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging GmbH) and an Olympus
205
DP-25 single chip colour CCD camera (Olympus Life Science Europa GmbH, Hamburg,
9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
206
Germany). Approximately 18 – 20 grains/sample were examined and the representative
207
images were chosen for publication.
208
209
Data analysis
210
Pretreatment of spectroscopic data
211
NIR spectra are affected by differences in sample scattering. Differences in scattering can
212
occur due to the use of different pearling systems. To reduce the effect of such phenomena the
213
NIR spectra were normalized by standard normal variate (SNV)17 prior to calibration.
214
The fluorescence spectra were normalised by unit area normalisation, meaning that the area
215
under each spectrum equals one. This was done separately for emission spectra for the
216
different excitations. This normalisation removes the main intensity variations and emphasises
217
the shapes of the spectra.
218
Calibration
219
Partial least squares regression (PLSR)18 was used to make calibrations between spectroscopic
220
data and the reference values of phytic acid. Separate and common models for samples in
221
SampeSet1 and SampleSet2 were made. SampleSet3 was used as a test set.
222
The optimal number of PLSR factors of the calibration models was determined by full cross
223 224
validation. The predicted value for each sample, ݕො , was compared with the reference value, yi (nominal phytic acid concentration). The squared multivariate correlation coefficient (R2),
225
which describes the relationship between the measured and the predicted values of the y
226
variable, and the prediction error of the regression model, expressed as root-mean-square
10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 33
Page 11 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
227
error of either cross-validation (RMSECV), were used to evaluate the model performance.
228
RMSECV is defined as: 1 ܴ = ܸܥܧܵܯඩ (ݕ − ݕො )ଶ ܰ ே
ୀଵ
229
where i denotes the samples from i to N.
230
The obtained calibration models were used to predict phytic acid concentration in the test set
231
samples. Model performance was reported as the root-mean-square error of prediction
232 233
(RMSEP), calculated exactly as RMSECV (ݕො being result of prediction and not cross-
validation), and the multivariate correlation coefficient (R2). PLSR and spectroscopic pre-
234
processing were performed with the software The Unscrambler, ver. 9.8 (Camo AS, Oslo,
235
Norway).
236
Multivariate curve resolution
237
Fluorescence spectra lend themselves to curve resolution. Multivariate curve resolution
238
(MCR), enables extraction of potential pure spectroscopic components originating from the
239
different inherent fluorophores and their respective concentrations. The obtained
240
concentrations for MCR-components were compared with reference analyses. A non-
241
negativity constraint was applied in the spectra and concentration modes in order to obtain a
242
realistic solution. The algorithm for MCR has previously been described in detail.19,20 MCR
243
was carried out with the software The Unscrambler, ver. 9.8 (Camo AS)
244
245
Results and discussion
246
Detection of the effect of pearling on grain layers by microscopy 11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
247
The effect of the pearling on barley grain outer layers was verified by microscopy. For this,
248
grains of four barley varieties studied with varying degree of pearling were examined. In
249
Figure 1A-E, the appearance of native and pearled barley kernels of 'Olve' and the cross-cut
250
surfaces of corresponding kernels stained with Acid Fuchsin are presented. Stereomicroscopy
251
images showed that pearling first removed the hull and proceeded then gradually towards the
252
centre parts of the grain. However, the ends of the kernels seemed to be more readily pearled
253
than the sides.
254
The images of the stained cross-cut surfaces revealed that aleurone appearing blue due to
255
autofluorescence was first removed from the ventral side of the grain, excluding the ventral
256
furrow (Figure 1B) and then from the dorsal side (Figure 1C). This was followed by the
257
removal of the aleurone in the flanks of the kernels. Aleurone layer located in the ventral
258
furrow was not removed even with the pearling degree of 39% (Figure 1E). In general, it was
259
noticed that pearling of hulled and hulless barley kernels followed similar pattern although
260
aleurone layer of hulless varieties was removed at slightly lower degree of pearling than that
261
of hulled varieties (data not shown).
262
Phytic acid in pearling fractions
263
Figure 2 shows the concentration of phytic acid in the obtained dust fractions in the three
264
sample sets. It was expected that the concentration of phytic acid should increase in the dust
265
fractions from the beginning of the pearling and then decrease after passing the aleurone
266
layer. In the first trial (SampleSet1) the concentration of phytic acid vs degree of pearling
267
showed a quite flat appearance, which indicated that the aleurone layer was not concentrated
268
in a few dust fractions. It became obvious that the pearling did not remove all the aleurone,
269
since a clear decrease with pearling time was not observed. It turned out that the pearling
270
system used was not very efficient. For the second trial (SampleSet2), a different pearling
271
system was used, and in this case, it was observed that the concentration of phytic acid did 12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 12 of 33
Page 13 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
272
indeed decrease with longer pearling times. This difference indicated that the second pearling
273
system was more efficient than the first one. The aleurone was distributed more or less across
274
all fractions, but highest concentrations were obtained for pearling yields in the 13-25%
275
range. This result corresponds with Blandino et al.7 who found that the 15-25% pearling
276
fractions of barley had the highest antioxidant activity, which most likely was due to the
277
antioxidants in the aleurone layer. It should also be mentioned that the measured
278
concentrations of phytic acid were higher for the variety 'Olve' than for 'Marigold'. In the third
279
trial (SampleSet3) on hull-less barley, there was an immediate high concentration of phytic
280
acid due to very thin layers of pericarp and testa. A gradual decrease comparable with
281
SampleSet2 then occurred. The level of phytic acid in the two varieties 'Pihl' and 'Pirona' were
282
quite similar.
283
Phenolic acids in pearling fractions
284
Concentrations of ferulic acid, caffeic acid, p-coumaric acid and sinapic acid in one pearling
285
series of 'Olve' and 'Marigold' from SampleSet2 are shown in Figure 3. The evolution of the
286
concentrations of caffeic and sinapic acid with pearling degree followed a pattern similar to
287
the concentration of phytic acid, although the maximum concentrations were reached at
288
slightly lower pearling degrees than phytic acid. Ferulic and p-coumaric acid followed
289
different patterns, which are related to their distribution along the different layers of the grain.
290
The concentration of ferulic acid continuously decreased at an approximately constant rate for
291
pearling degrees between 10-50%. This corresponds to Ndolo et al.21 who found that the
292
concentration of ferulic acid in the pericarp and aleurone in two barley varieties were high,
293
but much lower in the endosperm. Thus, the more endosperm entering the pearling fraction,
294
the concentration of ferulic acid will decrease. Even though ferulic acid is responsible for the
295
strong bluish fluorescence in the aleurone layer, the concentrations are also high in the
296
pericarp tissue, which does not exhibit this strong blue fluorescence. Regarding p-coumaric 13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
297
acid, its maximum concentration in dust is obtained at the beginning of the pearling process,
298
indicating that highest concentrations are found in the pericarp. These profiles suggest that the
299
concentrations of p-coumaric and ferulic acid are not the best markers for the aleurone layer.
300
This is in agreement with results obtained after isolation of barley grain tissues from both
301
hulled and hulless barley for chemical analyses of biomarkers.8
302
Spectroscopic measurements
303
Figure 4 shows typical NIR spectra from dust fractions ('Olve' from SampleSet2). For
304
unprocessed absorption spectra, the highest offset was obtained for first fraction, and
305
then the offset steadily decreased with increasing pearling time. This systematic
306
variation in offset is probably due to a corresponding variation in light scattering in the
307
samples. Colour of the samples did also vary systematically from dark to white with
308
pearling time, however, colour should not affect NIR spectra much in this spectral
309
region. For scatter corrected spectra the systematic offset disappeared, but clear
310
systematic changes with pearling time could be observed around 1100 nm and 1200 nm.
311
Figure 5 shows typical emission fluorescence spectra from dust fractions at the three assayed
312
excitation wavelengths. The emission spectra for excitation at 280 nm showed a main
313
maximum centred at 320 nm and a small shoulder around 438 nm. The emission spectra for
314
excitation at 360 nm was less intense and had a single maximum centred at 435 nm, slightly
315
broader than the main maximum of the former one. Lastly, the emission spectra for λex 470
316
nm, in some cases presents a maximum at 544 nm and in other cases it presents a quite flat
317
aspect with no maxima. For each sample set, the series of spectra registered at λex 280 nm,
318
showed a systematic increase from first to last fraction. For λex 360 nm, there was an increase
319
at start, and then a decrease; while for λex 470 nm there appeared to be a quite steady decrease
14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 14 of 33
Page 15 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
320
with pearling time. For regression analysis as well as MCR we used all three emission spectra
321
concatenated as shown in Figure 5.
322
Calibration results
323
Table 1 summarises calibration results for NIR spectroscopy for SampleSet 1 and
324
SampleSet2. It is clear that quite good regression models could be established for phytic acid
325
in the pearling fractions. The two sample sets behaved differently, better models were
326
obtained for SampleSet2. The two sample sets were produced by different pearling machines,
327
and this might be the reason for why different results were obtained, and also why the two
328
sample sets were not well modelled together. Attempts to remove the main spectral variation
329
due to differences in light scattering properties did not significantly improve the model where
330
the two datasets were combined. The best model was obtained for SampleSet2 after SNV
331
correction of the spectra. This model required one PLS factor more than the model based on
332
raw absorption spectra, and this suggests that SNV enables modelling of more subtle spectral
333
changes. An R2 of 0.96 and a prediction error (RMSECV) of 0.16% is acceptable for the kind
334
of process application we are aiming at. Based on the regression coefficients (not shown) it is
335
not easy to identify the main chemical sources of information for the model, however, several
336
are probably contributing. Phytic acid has a distinct signature in the NIR region.10 The amount
337
of bran, protein and beta-glucan will vary systematically in these fractions, and NIR is
338
sensitive to all of them.9,22
339
The results for fluorescence spectroscopy are quite similar to those of NIR (Table 1). Better
340
results for SampleSet2 than for SampleSet1 were also obtained now, and the combination of
341
the two data sets lead to slightly more complex models. The unit area normalisation did not
342
give notably better calibration models, and for the combined data set the performance was
343
worse than for raw fluorescence spectra. This suggests that the actual fluorescence intensity is
15 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
344
important for the modelling. Common for NIR and fluorescence was that models for DataSet2
345
required more components than did DataSet1. This indicates that SampleSet2 contained some
346
spectral variation that was not present in SampleSet1. Since poorer models for phytic acid
347
were obtained for SampleSet1 for both NIR and fluorescence, there might have been some
348
mismatch between the spectroscopic data and the reference values. From Figure 2 is can be
349
seen that phytic acid in SampleSet1 varied up and down in an unexpected way as function of
350
pearling degree.
351
It is reasonable that fluorescence can be used to indirectly measure the amount of phytic acid
352
since it is a marker for the aleurone layer. As pointed out above, pericarp, aleurone and
353
endosperm have distinct and different fluorescent properties.13 Different phenolic acids in the
354
aleurone are fluorescent, for instance, ferulic acid, caffeic acid, sinapic acid and p-coumaric
355
acid (Figure 3).23 Phytic acid is, however, to our knowledge not fluorescent.
356
The chemical foundation for the calibrations (both NIR and fluorescence) is not completely
357
clear. It was therefore important to validate these models on independent samples. Table 2
358
summarises how the prediction models based on Sampleset2 performed on SampleSet3,
359
which were made of two other barley varieties. The models for Sampleset2 were used since
360
SampleSet2 and 3 were produced by the same pearling system. It can be seen that except for
361
the model based on raw fluorescence data, the correlations between the predicted and
362
measured values of phytic acid were high (0.95-0.97). For all the models there were unwanted
363
issues with offsets or biases compared to the reference values, but Figure 6 shows that the
364
predicted values were quite accurate and useful. All the predicted values were in the right
365
concentration range and they followed the same trend with pearling degree as did measured
366
phytic acid. On samples from 'Pihl', the NIR predicted values were very close to the reference
367
values, while for those from 'Pirona' the predicted values were systematically below. The
368
fluorescence model performed at about the same level as NIR. 16 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 16 of 33
Page 17 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
369
There are differences between varieties of barley, and for the optical measurements described
370
here, this can probably result in systematic offsets as seen for the NIR predictions for 'Pirona'.
371
That means that for process purposes, it might be necessary to follow the progression of the
372
pearling dust during pearling rather than to rely on absolute values.
373
The model based on raw fluorescence spectra did not perform well on the test samples, while
374
the normalised spectra worked well. This indicates that the shape of the spectra are more
375
important than the actual intensities. Pre-processing of fluorescence spectra from front face
376
measurements of intact bio-samples for quantitative modelling is not a well explored topic,
377
and should be more thoroughly elucidated.
378
Multivariate curve resolution
379
MCR was attempted only on fluorescence data, since these spectra apparently consisted of
380
rather few spectral components. Normalised fluorescence spectra from SampleSet2 and
381
SampleSet3 were together subjected to MCR and three dominant spectral components were
382
found (Figure 7). Based on these components their relative concentrations could be estimated,
383
shown in Figure 8 for a set of pearling fractions for each of the varieties 'Olve', 'Marigold',
384
'Pihl' and 'Pirona'. One component shows a maximum at 335 nm for excitation 280 nm, which
385
do probably originate from tryptophan with possible contributions from tyrosine and
386
phenylalanine. The estimated concentrations for this component increases steadily with
387
pearling time and indicates the amount of endosperm in the fractions. The second component
388
has a maximum emission around 430 nm for excitation at 280 nm and at about 445 nm for
389
excitation at 350 nm. These are typical properties for phenolic acids. The concentration of this
390
component tends to follow a quite similar course to phytic acid and the aleurone layer (Figure
391
2). The third spectral component has a broad maximum around 550 nm for excitation 470 nm,
17 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
392
and it decreased quite rapidly with pearling time. The identification of this component is not
393
clear, however it has previously been detected in pericarp.13
394
The estimated concentrations for the second component correlated well with the
395
concentrations of phytic acid, ferulic acid and caffeic acid (0.95, 0.95 and 0.98, respectively)
396
for the 'Pihl' and 'Pirona' samples. For SampleSet2, 'Olve' and 'Marigold', the corresponding
397
correlations were lower (0.64, 0.88, 0.73, respectively) mainly due to mismatch with the first
398
pearling fraction in every pearling series. If these were removed from the data set, the
399
correlations increased notably (0.90. 0.90 and 0.93, respectively). It is clear that the intensity
400
of fluorescence from the outer pericarp does not correlate well with the amount of phenolic
401
acids. Even though the fluorescent ferulic acid is present in the pericarp, the fluorescence is
402
very low. A reason might me that the fluorescence is quenched or reabsorbed by other
403
molecules in this tissue.
404
Overall, the results illustrate that it is possible to decompose rather complex fluorescence
405
spectra from intact pearling fractions into approximate concentrations of aleurone, endosperm
406
and pericarp. This approach is excellent for interpretation of the spectroscopic data, and might
407
also be used for continuous and semi-quantitative process monitoring.
408
The results from this work indicate that it is possible to estimate the amount of phytic acid,
409
and therefore the amount of aleurone, in pearling dust fractions from barley by both NIR and
410
fluorescence spectroscopy. The techniques are rapid and no sample pre-treatment is required,
411
which means that they can be used on-line in connection with industrial pearling systems.
412
NIR is well established in the cereal industry and suitable equipment is available for on-line
413
use on flour streams. A system for fluorescence spectroscopy would in principle be easy to
414
make, but might not presently be ready available off the shelf. In this work we used
415
concatenated emission spectra for three different excitations, but it might be sufficient to use
18 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 18 of 33
Page 19 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
416
two or even just one excitation. Based on modelling the 280 nm excitation was the most
417
informative, then 350 nm, and 470 nm the least informative.
418
There are systematic differences between barley varieties. For example, 'Olve' seems to
419
contain more phytic acid than 'Marigold' (Figure 2b), and 'Pirona' might contain more than
420
'Pihl'. It means that an aleurone peak in dust fractions of 'Olve' will have a higher phytic acid
421
content than the corresponding fractions from 'Marigold'. The level of phytic acid in the
422
grains at hand must probably be monitored over time in the process before process
423
optimisation can be performed.
424
An on-line system can be used to adjust the pearling time for each batch to optimise the
425
amount and flour quality and to minimise the amount of pearling dust. One can also envision
426
specially designed pearling systems where it can be possible to follow the pearling process
427
and automatically extract fractions with high concentrations of aleurone and at the same time
428
control the process towards optimal utilisation of the raw material.
429
430
Acknowledgements
431
This work was partially funded by the EU-project BarleyBoost and the Norwegian
432
Agricultural Food Research Foundation through the projects Food Imaging (project
433
number 225347/F40) and Food for Health - Dietary fibre and glycaemic carbohydrates
434
(225352/F40). Hanne Zobel is thanked for skilled technical assistance.
435
436 437
19 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
438
References
439
1.
Izydorczyk, M.S.; Symmons, S.J.; Dexter, J.E. Fractionation of wheat and barley. In
440
Whole-grain foods in health and desease. Marquart, L.M., Slavin, J.L., Fulcher, R.G.,
441
Eds.: American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, MN, 2002. 2. Jadhav, S.J.; Lutz, S.E.; Ghorpade, V.M.; Salunkhe, D.K. Barley: chemistry and
442
value-added processing. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1998, 38, 123-171.
443 444
3.
Hemery, Y.; Rouau, X.; Lullien-Pellerin, V.; Barron, C.; Abecassis, J. Dry processes to
445
develop wheat fractions and products with enhanced nutritional quality. J. Cereal Sci.
446
2007, 46, 327-347.
447
4.
Hemery, Y.; Lullien-Pellerin, V.; Rouau, X.; Abecassis, J.; Samson, M.F.; Åman, P.; von
448
Reding, W.; Spoerndli, C.; Barron, C. Biochemical markers: Efficient tools for the
449
assessment of wheat grain tissue proportions in milling fractions. J. Cereal Sci. 2009, 49,
450
55-64.
451
5.
EFSA. 2011. Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of health claims related to beta-
452
glucans from oats and barley and maintenance of normal blood LDL-cholesterol
453
concentrations (ID 1236, 1299), increase in satiety leading to a reduction in energy intake
454
(ID 851, 852), reduction of post-prandial glycaemic responses (ID 821, 824), and
455
“digestive function” (ID 850) pursuant to Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No
456
1924/20061. EFSA J. 2011, 9, 2207.
457
6. Holtekjølen, A.K.; Sahlstrøm, S.; Knutsen, S.H. Phenolic contents and antioxidant
458
activities in covered whole-grain flours of Norwegian barley varieties and in fractions
459
obtained after pearling. Acta Agric. Scand., Sect. B. 2011, 61, 67-74.
460
7.
Blandino, M.; Locatelli, M.; Sovrani, V.; Coïsson J.D.; Rolle, L.; Travaglia, F.; Giacosa,
461
S.; Bordiga, M.; Scarpino, V.; Reyneri, A.; Arlorio, M. Progressive pearling of barley
462
kernel: chemical characterization of pearling fractions and effect of their inclusion on the 20 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 20 of 33
Page 21 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
463
nutritional and technological properties of wheat bread. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63,
464
5875–5884.
465
8.
Barron, C.; Holopainen-Mantila, U; Sahlstrøm, S.; Holtekjølen, A.K.; Lullien-Pellerin, V.
466
Assessment of biochemical markers identified in wheat for monitoring barley grain
467
tissue. J. Cereal Sci. In press. Accepted 09.01.2017.
468
9.
Schmidt, J.; Gergely, S.; Schönlechner, R.; Grausgruber, H.; Tömösközi, S; Salgó, A.;
469
Berghofer E. Comparison of different types of NIR instruments in ability to measure β-
470
glucan content in naked barley. Cereal Chem. 2009, 86, 398–404.
471
10. Pande, R.; Mishra, H.N. Fourier transform near-infrared spectroscopy for rapid and
472
simple determination of phytic acid content in green gram seeds (Vigna radiata). Food
473
Chem. 2014, 172, 880–884.
474
11. Parrish, F.W.; Madacsi, J.P.; Phillippy, B.Q.; Wilfred, A.G.; Buco, S.M. Determination
475
of phytic acid in cottonseed by near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. J. Agric. Food
476
Chem. 1990, 38, 407-409
477
12. Fulcher, R.G.; O’Brien, T.P.; Lee, J.W. Studies on the aleurone layer 1. Conventional and
478
fluorescence microscopy of the cell wall with emphasis on phenol-carbohydrate
479
complexes in wheat. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 1972, 25, 23-34.
480
13. Jensen, S.Å.; Munck, L.; Martens, H. The botanical constituents of wheat and wheat
481
milling fractions. I. Quantification by autofluorescence. Cereal Chem. 1982, 59, 477-484.
482
14. Symons, S.J.; Dexter, J.E. Computer analysis of fluorescence for the measurement of
483
flour refinement as determined by flour ash content, flour grade color, and tristimulus
484
color measurements. Cereal Chem. 1991, 68, 454-460.
485
15. Hole, A.S.; Grimmer, S.; Naterstad, K.; Jensen, M.R.; Paur, I.; Johansen, S.G.; Balstad,
486
T.R.; Blomhoff, R.; Sahlstrom, S. Activation and inhibition of nuclear factor Kappa B
21 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
487
activity by cereal extracts: Role of dietary phenolic acids. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57,
488
9481-9488.
489
16. Hole, A.S.; Rud, I.; Grimmer, S.; Sigl, S.; Narvhus, J.; Sahlstrom, S. Improved
490
bioavailability of dietary phenolic acids in whole grain barley and oat groat following
491
fermentation with probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus johnsonii, and
492
Lactobacillus reuteri. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 6369-6375.
493 494
495 496 497 498 499
17. Barnes, R.J.; Dhanoa, M.S.; Lister, S.J. Standard normal variate transformation and detrending of near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectra. Appl. Spectrosc. 1989, 43, 772-777. 18. Martens, H.; Naes, T. Multivariate Calibration; Wiley: Chichester, U.K., 1989. 19. Tauler, R. Multivariate curve resolution applied to second order data. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1995, 30, 133–146. 20. Tauler, R.; Smilde, A.; Kowalski, B. Selectivity, local rank, 3-way data analysis and ambiguity in multivariate curve resolution. J. Chemom. 1995, 9, 31-58.
500
21. Ndolo, V.U; Beta, T.; Fulcher, R.G. Ferulic acid fluorescence intensity profiles and
501
concentration measured by HPLC in pigmented and non-pigmented cereals. Food Res.
502
Int. 2013, 52, 109-118.
503
22. Kays, S.E.; Shimizu, N.; Barton, F.E.; Ohtsubo, K. Near-infrared transmission and
504
reflectance spectroscopy for the determination of dietary fiber in barley cultivars. Crop
505
Sci. 2005, 45, 2307-2311.
506
23. Lichtenthaler, H.K.; Schweiger, J. Cell wall bound ferulic acid, the major substance of
507
the blue-green fluorescence emission of plants. J. Plant Physiol. 1998, 152, 272-282.
508 509
510
22 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 22 of 33
Page 23 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
511
Figure captions
512 513
Figure 1 Stereomicrographs (upper panel) and epifluorescence micrographs (lower panel) of
514
grains (cv. 'Olve') with different degree of pearling: (A) Native, unpearled grain; grains with
515
pearling degree of 14% (B), 27% (C), 32% (D) and 39% (E). In epifluorescence images,
516
aleurone layer appears bright blue surrounding starchy endosperm stained red. Scale bars
517
represent 5 mm and 500 µm in the lower and upper panel images, respectively.
518 519
Figure 2 Concentration of phytic acid in pearling fractions from (A) 'Olve' (red) and
520
'Marigold' (blue) (SampleSet1), (B) 'Olve' (red) and 'Marigold' (blue) (SampleSet2), and
521
(C) 'Pihl' (blue) and 'Pirona' (red) (SampleSet3).
522 523
Figure 3 Concentration of (A) Ferulic acid, (B) p-Coumaric acid, (C) caffeic acid, and
524
(D) Sinapic acid in pearling fractions from 'Olve' (red) and 'Marigold' (blue) from
525
SampleSet2.
526 527
Figure 4 NIR spectra from dust fractions after pearling. Absorption spectra (left), SNV
528
corrected spectra (right). Line colors indicate different pearling degrees.
529 530
Figure 5 Fluorescence spectra from dust fractions after pearling. Line colors indicate different
531
pearling degrees.
532 533
Figure 6 Predicted phytic acid in 32 pearling fractions of barley varieties 'Pihl' (upper panel)
534
and 'Pirona' (lower panel). Referenced phytic acid (black line), predicted by fluorescence
535
(blue line), predicted by NIR (red line).
536 537
Figure 7 Estimated spectral components from fluorescence spectra by MCR. Component 1
538
(green), component 2 (red), component 3 (blue).
539 540
Figure 8 Estimated concentrations of MCR components based on fluorescence spectra from
541
different barley varieties, A) 'Marigold', B) 'Olve', C) 'Pihl', D) 'Pirona'. Component 1 (green),
542
component 2 (red), component 3 (blue).
543
23 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 24 of 33
544
Tables
545
Table 1 Results for Regression Models Based on NIR, Cross-Validated Models. Pearling data set Spectral data # PLSR comp. R2 RMSECV SampleSet1 NIR Absorption 2 0.86 0.23 NIR SNV 4 0.85 0.24 SampleSet2 NIR Absorption 5 0.94 0.20 NIR SNV 6 0.96 0.16 SampleSet1 + NIR Absorption 7 0.87 0.28 SampleSet2 NIR SNV 8 0.89 0.26 SampleSet1 Fluorescence 2 0.85 0.23 Fluorescence norm 3 0.85 0.24 SampleSet2 Fluorescence 5 0.95 0.18 Fluorescence norm 4 0.96 0.18 Trial 1+3 Fluorescence 5 0.92 0.22 Fluorescence norm 5 0.87 0.28
546
547
Table 2 Results for Prediction of Test Set Pearling data set Spectral data NIR Absorption SNV Fluorescence Raw fluorescence Unit area norm
R2 0.95 0.97 0.49 0.97
548 549
550
551
552
24 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
RMSEP 1.47 0.35 1.14 0.36
Offset -1.04 0.17 2.20 0.65
Page 25 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
553
FIGURES
A
B
C
D
Figure 1
Figure 1
25 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
E
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
3.5
A
3
g/100g
2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 5
15
25
35
45
55
15
25
35
45
55
25
35
45
55
3.5
B
3.0
g/100g
2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 5 4.5
C
4 3.5
g/100g
3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 5
15
Pearling degree (% w/w)
Figure 2
26 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 26 of 33
Page 27 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
A
B
C
D
Figure 3
27 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Page 28 of 33
B
A
Figure 4
28 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 29 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Figure 5
250000
F lu o res cen ce in ten s ity
600000
40000
λex= 280 nm
λex= 360 nm
0
0
300
400
500
10 % (w/w) 14 % (w/w) 18 % (w/w) 22 % (w/w) 26 % (w/w) 30 % (w/w) 33 % (w/w) 38 % (w/w)
λex= 470 nm
0
400
450
500
550
480
520
Emission wavelength (nm)
Figure 5
29 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
560
600
640
680
4
4
3.5
3.5
3
3
2.5
2.5
g/100g
g/100g
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
2
2
1.5
1.5
1
1
0.5
0.5
0
0 5.0
15.0
25.0
35.0
45.0
5.0
Pearling degree (%)
15.0
25.0
35.0
45.0
Pearling degree (%)
4.5
4.5
4
4
3.5
3.5
3
3
g/100g
g/100g
Page 30 of 33
2.5 2
2.5 2
1.5
1.5
1
1
0.5
0.5
0
0 5.0
15.0
25.0
35.0
45.0
5.0
Pearling degree (%)
15.0
25.0
35.0
Pearling degree (%)
Figure 6 554
30 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
45.0
Page 31 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
0.1
0.08
0.1
0.07 0.08
0.08 0.06 0.05
0.06
0.06
0.04 0.04
0.04
0.03 0.02
0.02
0.02 0.01
0 300
350
400
450
500
Wavelength (nm)
0 400
0 450
500
550
600
Wavelength (nm)
Figure 7
31 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
500
550
600
Wavelength (nm)
650
MCR estimated concentrations
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1.8
B
1.6
1.4
1.4
1.2
1.2
1
1
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0
0 5
MCR estimated concentrations
1.8
A
1.6
Page 32 of 33
1.8
15
25
35
45
55
5 1.8
C
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.2
1
1
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0
25
35
45
55
D
1.6
1.4
15
0 5
15
25
35
45
5
Pearling degree (% w/w)
15
25
35
Pearling degree (% w/w)
Figure 8
32 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
45
Page 33 of 33
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
TOC Graphic
33 ACS Paragon Plus Environment