Reactions in Concentrated Lithium Chloride Solution. Determination of

Reactions in Concentrated Lithium Chloride Solution. Determination of Free Acid and Hydrolyzable Cation. HISASHI KUBOTA and D. A. COSTANZO. Analytical...
0 downloads 0 Views 371KB Size
Reactions in Concentrated Lithium

C iloride Solution

Determination of Free Acid and Hydrolyzab e Cation HISASHI KUBOTA and

D. A.

COSTANZO

Analytical Chemistry Division, Oak Ridge National laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn.

Procedure. Add sample to 30 ml. of saturated lithium chloride contained in a titration vessel. A-hile stirring, add enough water to bring final volume to about 40 ml. Titrate with standard base until the desired end points are obtained.

'Free acid in the presence of hydrolyzable cations can be determined directly by potentiometric titration with base in 10M lithium chloride medium without the need of adding a special complexing agent. This method is especially applicable when the cation forms a strong chloro complex. Continued titration past the free acid end point gives a second break which shows the equivalents of hydrolyzable cations. A mixture of several cations can be differentiated by this titration if there is a difference of at least seven units between their respective pKs (solubility product). The order of titration is from the least soluble hydroxide to the most soluble hydroxide.

C

and Johnson ( I ) reported that concentrated solutions of strong acid-strong base salts can serve as media for the titration of bases with p K as high as 11. I n a later paper ($2) the same authors discuss the effect of the concentrated salt medium on pH and suggest that the increased activity of hydrogen ion in such solutions makes possible determinations of weak base. Some of the neutral salts they investigated included calcium chloride, sodium chloride, lithium chloride, and sodium iodide in concentrations up to saturation or 8M. The chloride and bromide salts of lithium are among the most soluble of the strong acid-strong base salts with solubilities nearly twice those of the next soluble salts. Lithium chloride is readily available, and concentrated solutions are used in many separation procedures a t this laboratory. Preliminary work to adapt analytical procedures directly to the concentrated solution showed that this medium possesses unique properties which make possible many novel analytical applications. This paper describes free acid determination In the presence of a hydrolyzable ion without the addition of a separate complexing agent followed by the determination of the hydrolyzable cation.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

RITCHFIELD

EXPERIMENTAL

Lithium chloride, saturated (13.931). Prepare a saturated solution of reagent grade lithium chloReagents.

2454

0

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY

Figure 1. Titration of free acid and hydrolyzable cation

ride (Baker's reagent) by adding 600 grams of this salt in small batches to 500 ml. of water. The dissolution is exothermic and lithium chloride solubility has a large positive temperature coefficient. If dissolution is incomplete in the hot solution, add just enough water to complete dissolution and store the solution in a stoppered container. Crystals separate on cooling indicating saturation. Standard base. Either lithium or sodium hydroxide can be used. The former has a solubility of about 1.11 and the latter about 0.3N in 10M lithium chloride which is the medium in which the titrant is made. To prepare 1M lithiuni hydroxide, saturate 10.11 lithium chloride with the hydroxide, allow solution to stand overnight, and decant supernate. To prepare 0.1JI sodium hydroxide, dilute the proper amount of 131 sodium hydroxide in one volume with water and add to three volumes of saturated lithium chloride. Standardize by conventional procedures. Apparatus. Self-recording potentiometric titrator, 5-10 ml. microburet, and glass calomel electrodes.

Titration curves for free acid and aluminum or iron(II1) are shown in Figure 1. I n either curve there is a sharp free-acid break folloJTed by a second break which corresponds to the total equivalents of hydrolyzable ion. Free-acid determinations in the presence of ferric iron are ordinarily troublesome because there is always some tendency of base to react partially with the complexed iron. This medium makes possible a clear-cut, free-acid determination with minimal hydrolytic effects. The single break corresponding to the neutralization of cation indicat'es that there is no clear demarcation between the mono-, di-, and trihydroxy specie in this medium under given conditions. The titration in the presence of beryllium is shown in Figure 2 in which both t,he potentiometric and first derivative curves are given. Again, there is a good free-acid break. The metal hydrolysis portion, however, shows two breaks which correspond to the mono- and dihydroxy beryllium compounds. The separate breaks must mean t,hat beryllium forms distinct mono- and dihydroxy specie with widely separated formation constants. This is the only cation thus far st,udied which has shown this behavior. There are relatively few volumet'ric methods for beryllium, and this titration compares favorably with any now available from the standpoints of ease and precision. h list' of cations in whose presence this free-acid determination was attempted includes aluminum, beryllium, chromium(II1) , copper(II), iron(III), nickel, niobium, rare earths, thorium, uranium, and zirconium. This approach is particularly useful for free acid determinations in the presence of iron, beryllium, t,horium, zirconium, and niobium. In the case of niobium the lithium chloride medium should be as close to saturation as possible. The more readily hydrolyzable cations are usually kept in solutions relatively

Figure 2. beryllium

Titration of free acid and

strong in acid. If the tit,rator used has limited chart travel, it is expedient to add a known volume of titrant by pipet to cut down on actual chart travel. All the cations listed above can be determined as the hydroxides. Copper, iron(III), niobium, uranium, and zirconium are known to form stable chloro complexes. The free-acid break in the 1)resctnce of chloride complex forming cation:: is sharp, and the magnitude of the tlreak remains fairly constant over a wide range of acid to cation ratio. The change in the magnitude of free-acid break with changes in acid to cation ratio is shown in Figure 3 for aluminum which is a cation which does not form chloride complexes in aqueous medium. The titration of a mixture of acid, ferric, chromic, and nickelous ions is This stepwise shown in Figure 4. titration was first observed in solutions of corrosion products from stainless steels and indicates that in this medium the electrode system can differentiate between the titration of the three cations with base. The pK (solubility product) of the three metal hydroxides along with those of copper and aluminum are

t

~

Figure 3. Change in free acid break with H/AI ratio

shown in Table I. Between the three cations listed, the minimum ference in p K values of seven is between that of iron and chromium. From actual practice this is very close to the limit a t which differentiation is possible. Copper can be differentiated from iron, chromium, or aluminum but not from nickel. I n a similar manner, aluminum can be distinguished from copper or nickel but not from chromium or iron. These pK values were obtained from aqueous systems, and the absolute values are not expected to be the same in the concentrated salt medium. There is also some question in comparing pK values between dibasic and tribabic ions in place of molar solubilities. On the other hand, this empirical rule of thumb has proved valid over the few cations for which reliable solubility product data are available, and it is hoped that this will provide a clue to possible explanation of the differentiation mechanism. The two distinct breaks for beryllium may indicate that' there is a difference of a t least, seven between the pK's of the stability constants.

Figure 4. Titration of stainless steel corrosion products

Critchfield and Johnson ( 2 ) suggested that the hydronium ion in strong salt solutions was divested of part of its waters of hydration and consequently acquired greater activity. Hogfeldt and Leifer (3) in a study of the lithium chloride-water system calculated the average hydration of lithium to drop from six in dilute solutions to 3.1 in concentrated, while the chloride hydration dropped from two to zero in the same range. Above 6M lithium chloride lithium ions do not have maximum hydration and would be expected to take up any free water or waters of hydration from cations which do not retain waters of hydration as readily as lithium. Cations which form chloro complexes should give up their waters of hydration readily, and this is clearly shown by iron or copper in which addition of cation to lithium chloride immediately brings out the strong

Table

I.

pK (s.P.) of Some Metal Hydroxides

PK (s.P.) Fe(OHh

37 2 30.1 14.7 19.7 31.7

yellow color of the corresponding chloro complex. I n aqueous medium it is evident that acid neutralization and hydrolysis take place simultaneously. In this medium it seems expedient to disregard the normal picture of hydrolysis and envision instead a direct replacement of chloride or water by hydroxyl. The experimental data indicate that the hydrogen ion neutralization reaction is more favored than the displacement, reaction possibly because of its very high activity. The amount of sample taken for will depend to a large extent on ngth of titrant used and is usually adjusted to the capacity of the buret. Thus, when titrant strength is 0.1JI and buret capacity 10 ml., not more than 1.0 niilliequivalent total of acid and cation would normally be the upper limit. Correspondingly, the limit would be 10 milliequivalents when 1-11 titrant is used. There seems to be little difference in the'type of titration curves obtained using titrant of either strength except aluminum which \vas found to behave dif'ferently a t the two concentmtion levcls. The titration of 1.3 niilliniolcs of aluminum with l d l lithium is ihon-n in Figure 5 . This w s not only the aluminum break liut also what is close to the aluminate break. This is in contrast to the titration curve of Figure 1 in which there is no aluminate break. A gelatinous precipitate forniq even after base sufficient to form the aluminate has b e m ndrlcd in the titration a t the dilute lel-el, iviii![, I hi change

Figure 5. Titration aluminate break

of

AI showing

VOL. 3 6 , NO. 1 3 , DECEMBER 1 9 6 4

0

2455

from a gelatinous precipitate to an opalescent colloidal solution is evident a t the concentrated level. As yet, there is no good explanation for this behavior. The precision of determinations can be varied over a limited range by proper adjustments of relative amount of sample, titrant strength, or titration speed. The precision of a determination which is the difference of two end-point interpolations necessarily suffers in comparison with one in which only one end point is located. Thus, free acid determinations are possible with relative precision of 1-3YG and those of the cations from 2-10%. The latter determination can become almost meaningless in cases of mixtures of cations whose hydroxide solubilities are fairly close together. This titration does not offer a better method of determination over other methods now available for hydrolyzable cations with the exception of beryllium. I t does afford anapproach to a rapid semiquantitative estimation in the case of one simple cation and a qualitative and semi quantitative identification in the case of mixtures of certain cations.

Presently available reagent grade lithium chloride shows great variation in quality from various vendors and between batches from the same vendor. Material from the most reliable commercial source thus far still contains a small amount of hydrolyzable cation which can be removed by combined solvent extraction and ion exchange treatment. There is also some residual basic material which can be neutralized or adjusted for as a reagent blank. The effect of reagent blanks can be minimized by titrating a t higher concentrations. Ten molar lithium chloride is used in many chemical operations a t this laboratory, and analytical work thus far indicates that this is a good level a t which to operate from the standpoints of nonaqueous behavior, fluidity, and solubility parameters. The glass calomel electrode pair gives excellent response to changes taking place during these titrations. A high alkali glass electrode (such as Beckman 40495) gives better all around performance in the high salt solutions and is recommended in preference to the ordinary glass electrode. There is loss

in sensitivity with time: however, this degradation is very slow. Sulfates and phosphates form insoluble lithium salts. The former causes no interference with either free acid or cation determination, but the latter is a definite interference which cannot be tolerated. Hydroxyl will not displace fluoride; therefore, any fluoride present will detract from the total equivalents of cations. Carbonates are also relatively insoluble in this medium, and titrations at high pH levels can be carried out with little danger of carbon dioxide pickup and dissolution interfering with the end point break. LITERATURE CITED

( 1 ) Critchfield, F. E., Johnson, J. B., ANAL.CHEM.30, 1247 (1958). ( 2 ) Zbid., 31, 570 (1959). ( 3 ) Hogfeldt, E., Leifer, L., Acta Chem. Scand. 17, 338 (1963).

RECEIVEDfor review August 28, 1964. Accepted September 21, 1964. 12th Anachem Meeting, Detroit, SIich., October 1964. Research sponsored by the C . S. Atomic Energy Commission under contract with the Union Carbide Corp.

Correction of Quenching in Liquid Scintillation Counting of Homogeneous Samples Containing Both Carbon-14 and Tritium by Extrapolation Method C. T. PENG Radioacfivity Research Center and School of Pharmacy, University of California, Son Francisco, Calif.

b An extrapolation method for quenching correction in doubly labeled samples is described. The samples are integral-counted at different concentrations in a two-channel liquid scintillation spectrometer which is adjusted to afford the counts of C14 in the first channel and CL4and H3 in the second channel. Degrees of quenching in these two channels are shown to b e a simple and a composite exponential function of the sample concentration, respectively. In addition, attenuation of background counts by quenching in each sample can b e estimated from a correlation curve. Merits of integral vs. differential counting of doubly labeled samples are also discussed.

H

samples containing both carbon-14 and tritium can be counted in a two-channel liquid scintillation spectrometer. Because of the difference in their beta disintegration energy, it is possible to adjust the OMOGENEOUS

2456

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY

pulse height amplification and the acceptance slit appropriate to each channel so that channel 1 contains counts due to C14 in the sample and channel 2 contains counts of both isotopes. From a predetermined ratio of count rates or counting efficiencies observed in channels 2 and 1 with a given, nonquenched sample containing C14alone, the count rate due to H3 in an unquenched sample containing both isotopes can be computed by subtracting the counts in channel 1 multiplied by this ratio from the observed total counts in channel 2. The screening and the discriminator-ratio methods described by Okita et al. (6) and reexamined by Kabara et al. (6') are essentially of this principle. I n the presence of chemical and/or color quenching, the ratio of C14 counting efficiencies in the two channels will be altered from sample to sample. Failure to adjust for this deviation will invalidate the results obtained. The extent of quenching in the sample

can be measured by the use of internal standards of C14 and H3. Such a procedure, however, involves additional manipulations and counting of each sample following the addition of each internal standard, and, therefore, it is prone to error. This report describes a method in which the sample containing both C14 and H3 is counted at two different concentrations and from the observed counts in the two channels, quenching in the sample is corrected by the extrapolation method ( 7 ) . EXPERIMENTAL

The counting instrument usedin this study was a TriCarb liquid scintillation spectrometer, Model 314E, manufactured by Packard Instrument Co., Inc., La Grange, Ill. I n this instrument, the lower and the upper discriminator levels and the gain control of the pulse height amplification of each of the two channels can be individually adjusted. The settings used for this study for the integral mode of counting were 0100-toProcedure.