Real-time Quantitative PCR Measurements of ... - ACS Publications

Sep 8, 2017 - Real-time Quantitative PCR Measurements of Fecal. 1. Indicator Bacteria and Human-associated Source. 2. Tracking Markers in a Texas Rive...
0 downloads 0 Views 821KB Size
Subscriber access provided by Kaohsiung Medical University

Characterization of Natural and Affected Environments

Real-time Quantitative PCR Measurements of Fecal Indicator Bacteria and Human-associated Source Tracking Markers in a Texas River following Hurricane Harvey Vikram Kapoor, Indrani Gupta, ABM Tanvir Pasha, and Duc Phan Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00237 • Publication Date (Web): 10 May 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 11, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 26

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

1

Real-time Quantitative PCR Measurements of Fecal

2

Indicator Bacteria and Human-associated Source

3

Tracking Markers in a Texas River following Hurricane

4

Harvey

5

Vikram Kapoor*, Indrani Gupta, A.B.M. Tanvir Pasha, and Duc Phan

6

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Texas at San Antonio, San

7

Antonio, TX 78249, USA

8 9 10 11

Keywords. Fecal source tracking, human-associated Bacteroidales, quantitative PCR, genetic

12

markers, water quality, Hurricane Harvey

13 14 15 16 17

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

18

ABSTRACT

19

Hurricane Harvey has caused unprecedented devastation to huge parts of southeastern Texas,

20

particularly damaging the wastewater infrastructure resulting in release of sewage contamination

21

into environmental waters. The purpose of this study was to conduct a preliminary assessment of

22

fecal indicator bacteria (E. coli and enterococci) and human-associated fecal genetic markers

23

(Human-associated Bacteroidales), measured using qPCR assays, across a Texas river impacted

24

by Hurricane Harvey. Water samples were collected along the Guadalupe River during

25

September – December 2017. The most heavily flooded sites showed highest abundance of fecal

26

indicator bacteria and human-associated Bacteroidales markers indicating that a large number of

27

sewage overflows and stormwater runoff occurred during Harvey flooding. These findings

28

suggest that high levels of human fecal contamination were introduced into waterways draining

29

into the Gulf of Mexico and impaired surface water quality. The human-associated Bacteroidales

30

markers exhibited low to slightly strong correlation with conventional fecal indicators suggesting

31

the variable occurrence of different markers and uncertainty of enterococci and E. coli for

32

detection of human fecal pollution. In general, results of this initial microbiological contaminant

33

assessment will serve as baseline information for follow-on studies to monitor existing and

34

emerging public health risks to residents of Texas and potential long-term environmental impacts

35

upon the water resources in the impacted regions.

36

INTRODUCTION

37

Hurricane Harvey originated as a tropical storm over the Atlantic Ocean, becoming a Category 4

38

hurricane on August 25, 2017 as it approached the coast of Texas.1 After a week of storms and

39

heavy flooding, Hurricane Harvey devastated huge parts of southeastern Texas, particularly

40

damaging the wastewater infrastructure resulting in release of sewage contamination into 2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 26

Page 3 of 26

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

41

environmental waters.2,3 Immediately following Harvey, both the Texas Commission on

42

Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reported

43

the release of wastewater from sanitary sewers due to the historic flooding and more than 800

44

wastewater treatment plants reported spills.4,5 The widespread flooding resulted in sewage

45

overflows and contamination of floodwaters which eventually make their way into surface

46

waters, before finally discharging into the Gulf of Mexico. These sewage overflows contain high

47

levels of fecal bacteria and potentially pathogenic organisms posing a serious risk to human and

48

environmental health via waterborne disease outbreaks, deterioration of recreational and drinking

49

water quality, and degradation of aquatic ecology.6 Initial water samples collected from

50

floodwaters in affected areas showed E. coli levels greater than 100 times the EPA criteria for

51

recreation water quality standard,7 strongly suggesting mixture of sewage in water.2,8 Water

52

quality impacts have been reported for previous hurricanes but have primarily been limited to

53

chemical contaminants, and transient increases in nutrient loading.9-12 Moreover, these studies

54

have focused on contamination of localized water bodies such as the contamination of Lake

55

Pontchartrain (Louisiana) during Hurricane Katrina12,13 and limited data is available on the

56

distribution of microbial contaminants in impacted rivers and streams.

57

Hurricanes and large storms play a significant role in the transport of water contaminants across

58

environmental waters.10,11 Among these contaminants, the mobilization and distribution of fecal

59

indicator bacteria and human-associated fecal markers due to sewage overflows and stormwater

60

runoff resulting from flooding is poorly understood. There is a critical need to understand the

61

distribution and transport of fecal bacteria in contaminated surface waters due to ecological as

62

well as human health concerns. Emerging real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) methods designed

63

to estimate the concentration of fecal pollution by targeting genomic DNA from fecal indicator

3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

64

bacteria such as E. coli, Enterococcus spp., and Bacteroidales are now available and can

65

generate test results in just a few hours after sampling, which is critical during extreme events

66

such as hurricanes. These genetic markers may also detect viable but nonculturable (VBNC)

67

cells that are not detected by conventional cultivation approaches but may still pose a public

68

health risk. In this study, we have documented the levels of fecal indicator bacteria (E. coli and

69

enterococci) including human-associated fecal genetic markers (Human-associated

70

Bacteroidales), measured using qPCR assays, across a Texas river impacted by Hurricane

71

Harvey. In addition, we studied the correlation between human-associated Bacteroidales markers

72

and traditional fecal indicators to better evaluate the efficacy of using these markers for the

73

detection of human fecal pollution.

74

The primary objective of this study was to investigate the extent to which the flooded

75

waterways in Texas have been contaminated with microbial contaminants following Hurricane

76

Harvey. To accomplish this, we have evaluated the presence and abundance of fecal indicator

77

bacteria and selected human-associated markers in flood-impacted environmental waters.

78

Surface water samples were collected along the Guadalupe River, ranging from sites in Victoria,

79

TX (which recorded devastating flooding; see Figure S1)14 to its outfall in the Texas coast.

80

Samples were also collected from the San Antonio River as a control site since it is in close

81

proximity to Guadalupe River and was not severely impacted due to flooding.14 We applied a

82

suite of qPCR assays targeting E. coli, enterococci, and human-associated Bacteroidales markers

83

(HF183 and BacHum) to identify and quantify the fecal contamination in water. The results

84

presented here provide the much needed and critical data on the effects of human fecal

85

contamination sources on the surface water quality following Hurricane Harvey.

86 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 26

Page 5 of 26

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

87

MATERIALS AND METHODS

88

Sampling sites and sample collection. The Guadalupe River runs from Kerr County, Texas to

89

the San Antonio Bay in the Gulf of Mexico. The excessive rainfall from Hurricane Harvey

90

resulted in major flooding over the Guadalupe River at Victoria, TX during which the river

91

crested at about 32 feet (i.e. around 10 feet above the flood stage; see Figure S1). The water

92

quality of the river is a major concern as it is an important drinking water source for several

93

cities and some sections are used in recreational activities. Thus, fecal contamination of the river

94

is a significant public health concern and has a negative economic impact.

95

An a priori identification of representative sampling locations was not possible due to the

96

considerable logistical complications involving access to the sites and safety concerns. An initial

97

rapid assessment was performed on September 8, 2017 where multiple water samples were

98

collected from the Guadalupe River in flooded regions in Victoria, TX, and potential sampling

99

sites were identified. A more intensive sampling campaign was conducted two weeks later on

100

September 22, 2017 followed by three more sampling events each in October, November and

101

December 2017. During the intensive sampling campaign, water samples were collected from six

102

different sites along the Guadalupe River (G1, G2, G3, G4, G5 and G6) and two sites on the San

103

Antonio River (SA1 and SA2) over a period of 10 weeks from September 2017 to December

104

2017 (Figure 1). The sampling locations were chosen and categorized into flooded or non-

105

flooded sites based on the severity of impact due to rainfall and flooding (see Figure S2). The

106

description and coordinates of the sites has been listed in Table 1. Additional description of the

107

sampling sites has been given in Supporting Information.

108 109

Water samples were collected in duplicate from each site using sterilized 1 L bottles (Nalgene, Rochester, NY) and transported on ice to the laboratory at the University of Texas at 5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

110

San Antonio (San Antonio, TX) within 6 h of collection. The water samples (200 to 1,000 mL)

111

were filtered onto 0.45 μm pore-size, 47 mm diameter polycarbonate membranes (Pall Life

112

Sciences, Ann Arbor, Michigan) and stored at −20 °C until DNA extraction.

113

qPCR analyses. The occurrence and relative abundance of four different fecal bacterial markers

114

in environmental water samples was measured using TaqMan qPCR assays (Table S1) and DNA

115

extracts as the templates. DNA was extracted from filter samples using the DNeasy PowerLyzer

116

PowerSoil Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The

117

targeted fecal bacterial groups were E. coli (EC23S857 assay),15 Enterococcus spp. (Entero1

118

assay),16 and human-associated Bacteroidales (HF183 and BacHum assays).17,18 The qPCR

119

assays were performed as previously described.19 Additional details regarding DNA extraction

120

and qPCR assays have been provided in Supporting Information. The genetic markers used in

121

our study for the detection of E. coli and enterococci, have been correlated to public health risk20

122

and Entero1 assay has been incorporated by the EPA into water quality standards in the United

123

States.7 The two human-associated Bacteroidales qPCR markers have been evaluated in a

124

number of studies and been shown to be highly specific to human feces, with little to no cross

125

reactivity with other host feces.21,22 In addition, all the four qPCR markers have been validated

126

and tested in several studies for measuring human fecal contamination in environmental

127

waters.19,21-23

128

Data analyses. The marker copy number per 100 mL of water was calculated for those samples

129

with values above the limit of quantification for each assay, and all data were log10 transformed

130

before statistical analysis. The qPCR results for initial grab samples were excluded from any

131

subsequent analyses as these samples were obtained from slightly different locations than the

132

sampling sites established in this study. Differences in marker concentrations were analyzed 6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 26

Page 7 of 26

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

133

using non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance. The correlation between

134

human-associated Bacteroidales and conventional fecal indicators was analyzed using the

135

logistic regression analysis. All analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel (2016) and

136

correlation strength was interpreted according to an accepted scale for biological statistics.24 All

137

statistical test outcomes were regarded as significant at p < 0.001.

138

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

139

Performance of qPCR assays. Standard curves were generated using serial dilutions of known

140

copy numbers to determine the amplification efficiencies and linear range of the qPCR assays.

141

The qPCR amplification efficiencies for all the assays ranged from 92.5 to 105.6%, with r2

142

values between 0.986 and 0.999. The linear range of quantification for qPCR assay of human-

143

associated Bacteroidales (HF183 and BacHum) and E. coli markers were between 10 and 106

144

copies, while the linear range for qPCR assay of Entero1 was 20 – 2 × 106 copies. PCR

145

inhibition tests were performed with 10-fold dilutions of each DNA extract as described in

146

previous study.23 In these tests, a Ct value proportional to a 10-fold dilution relative to the

147

undiluted DNA templates resulted, suggesting that PCR inhibition did not interfere with the

148

amplification efficiency. No template controls (two per PCR plate) and DNA extraction controls

149

indicated the absence of contamination in the qPCR experiments.

150

Distribution of fecal indicator bacteria and human-associated marker levels. Initial grab

151

water samples (n = 4) were collected on September 8, 2017 near sites G4 and G5. The average

152

concentration of fecal bacterial indicators in these samples were 1.31 × 102 copies and 5.05 × 105

153

copies per 100 mL water for E. coli and enterococci, respectively. The average concentration of

154

human-associated Bacteroidales in these samples were 6.74 × 101 copies and 5.67 × 101 copies

7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

155

per 100 mL water for BacHum and HF183, respectively. This was followed by a more intensive

156

sampling campaign from September to December 2017.

157

The targeted fecal bacterial groups were frequently detected in the surface water samples

158

(n = 32) (40–100%). E. coli and enterococci were present in all the samples using the EC23S857

159

and Entero1 assays, respectively while the human-associated Bacteroidales were detected less

160

frequently. Enterococci exhibited the highest levels across all the sampling sites with mean

161

marker abundance greater than 103 copies per 100 mL water. The spatial distribution of the

162

levels of markers across the study sites is represented in Figure 2. The water samples yielded

163

significantly different amplification results across study sites with both the EC23S857 and

164

Entero1 assays, (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.001). Site G4 had the highest concentrations of E.

165

coli and enterococci among all the study sites. The two human-associated Bacteroidales markers,

166

HF183 and BacHum, exhibited a similar spatial distribution pattern across the sampling sites,

167

although the level of BacHum marker was slightly higher for all the samples. Both of the

168

markers tested positive at most of the sites, with the exception of sites G1 and SA2 where HF183

169

was not detected in any of the samples. The levels of the human-associated Bacteroidales

170

markers were statistically different (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.001) from each other among the

171

study sites. Site G4 had the highest mean copy number for the human-associated Bacteroidales

172

markers which is consistent with the excessive flooding at this site, and also because it was

173

located right after a WWTP and the discharge from the WWTP was fed into this region. Site G5

174

also had a relatively high concentration of human-associated Bacteroidales compared to other

175

sites. However, for site G6, which is located right after the confluence of Guadalupe River and

176

San Antonio River, the concentrations of both human-associated Bacteroidales markers

177

decreased, indicating that San Antonio River was not severely impacted by human fecal

8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 8 of 26

Page 9 of 26

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

178

contamination. This was also true for sites SA1 and SA2 (control sites on San Antonio River)

179

which had considerably lower levels of human-associated Bacteroidales.

180

The temporal distribution of the average levels of fecal indicator bacteria and human-

181

associated markers is presented in Figure 3. Sites G4 and G5 were classified as flooded regions

182

of the Guadalupe River, while sites G1, G2, G3 and G6 were located in the non-flooded areas.

183

Sites SA1 and SA2 were located in the non-flooded segments of the San Antonio River. On

184

average, all the markers had the highest concentrations for the flooded regions of the Guadalupe

185

River. Although, the concentrations of human-associated Bacteroidales was significantly higher

186

for the flooded sites than the non-flooded sites throughout the collection period, the observed

187

levels of human-associated fecal markers were considered relatively low for an impacted site.25

188

However, the concentrations for human-associated Bacteroidales remained elevated for flooded

189

sites even 2-3 months after Harvey suggesting that human fecal pollution may be a chronic and

190

relatively constant source of fecal contamination for the flood-impacted sites, both before and

191

after the hurricane. Samples collected on September 22, 2017, ~3 weeks after flooding,

192

demonstrated highest levels for E. coli, BacHum and HF183, both in the flooded and non-

193

flooded segments; however, no significant variation occurred over time (Kruskal-Wallis test, p >

194

0.5). Initial grab samples collected on September 8, 2017 (during recovery period from flooding)

195

from the flooded segment of Guadalupe River (near sites G4 and G5) had higher concentrations

196

of Entero1 marker than the samples collected on September 22, 2017 (3 weeks after flooding),

197

however the concentrations of other markers was slightly lower. This may be due to the

198

differences in the locations of the initial grab samples and the actual sampling sites, which were

199

not accessible earlier due to safety concerns.

9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

200

The presence of high concentrations of bacterial indicators in surface water samples

201

collected from flooded regions of the river were indicative of the fecal contamination in the

202

environmental waters of the impacted areas. The most heavily flooded sites showed the highest

203

abundance of fecal indicator bacteria and human-associated Bacteroidales indicating that the

204

large number of sewage overflows and stormwater runoff which occurred during Harvey

205

flooding introduced high levels of fecal bacteria into waterways draining into the Gulf of Mexico

206

and thereby impairing surface and coastal water quality. The concentrations of fecal indicator

207

bacteria, such as Enterococcus spp., in recreational waters impacted by sewage have been linked

208

to adverse health outcomes in swimmers through epidemiology studies.20 The U.S. EPA recently

209

published revised recreational water quality criteria for enterococci that aim to keep the risk of

210

gastrointestinal illness (GI) in swimmers below approximately 30 illnesses per 1000 primary

211

contact recreators.7 All initial water samples collected from the flooded regions of the Guadalupe

212

River had E. coli and enterococci concentrations above the regulatory level for contact

213

recreational waters,7 although it should be noted that our results were measured by qPCR

214

methods while the Recreational Water Quality Criteria is based on culturable E. coli or

215

enterococci. A recent study used quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) to simulate the

216

risk of GI illness associated with swimming in waters containing different concentrations of the

217

HF183 qPCR marker, and estimated there was a linear relationship between HF183 median

218

concentrations (in units of copies per 100 mL) and simulated GI illness rates [log10(GI risk) =

219

−4.93 + 0.94 × log10HF183; RSQ = 0.99].25 On the basis of this regression relationship, the

220

simulated GI illness rate per 1000 swimmers varied between 5.2 × 10-4 and 0.005 for the flooded

221

sites in Guadalupe River. This level of predicted human health risk based on HF183 marker is

222

relatively low as compared to the EPA-adopted health target of ∼30 GI illnesses per 1000

10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 10 of 26

Page 11 of 26

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

223

swimmers. Although the QMRA model used here relies on a scenario in which raw sewage

224

contaminates recreational waters, there are many other potential sources of human fecal pollution

225

such as leaking septic systems, open defecation, and treated wastewater. Future studies to

226

explore the relationships between human health and human-associated qPCR marker levels in

227

recreational waters impacted by sewage, treated effluents, and human feces are needed.

228

Stormwater runoff resulting from flooding can cause an influx of indicator bacteria to

229

receiving waters. Previous studies have demonstrated increased indicator bacteria levels in

230

coastal waters influenced by stormwater runoff.26-28 However, there are limited studies relating

231

the impact of flooding caused by hurricanes to the sources of fecal pollution in inland waterways.

232

Fecal bacteria may be introduced into surface waters during flooding through numerous sources

233

such as municipal waste from household sewage treatment systems, combined sewer overflows

234

(CSOs), sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs), damaged WWTPs, leaky septic tanks, and stormwater

235

and urban runoff.6,19 In this study we quantified the extent of human fecal contamination in

236

environmental waters by an integrated analysis of host-specific markers and fecal bacteria. The

237

assessment of study sites for human-associated Bacteroidales demonstrates that sewage sources

238

of fecal pollution are major contributors to water quality deterioration within our study area.

239

Because the Guadalupe River does not encompass agriculture or farming runoff, and there are no

240

CSOs in the sampling region, the primary source of human-associated Bacteroidales can be

241

attributed to the waste influx from damaged wastewater infrastructure and stormwater runoff. As

242

the river flow into the Gulf of Mexico, these sources appear to represent a chronic and relatively

243

constant source of human contamination for inland and near shore communities.

244

Correlation between human-associated Bacteroidales and fecal indicator bacteria. The

245

numbers of markers per 100 mL water sample were used to study the correlation between 11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology Letters

246

human-associated Bacteroidales and conventional fecal indicators (enterococci and E. coli). The

247

human-associated Bacteroidales markers showed low to slightly strong correlation with

248

enterococci and E. coli markers, which are the most frequently used water quality indicators

249

(Figure S3). There was a weak correlation between the BacHum and Entero1 markers in the

250

samples (correlation coefficient, r2 = 0.24, p < 0.001), although E. coli exhibited slightly stronger

251

correlation with the BacHum marker (r2 = 0.72, p < 0.001). HF183 also showed similar

252

correlation as BacHum with both Entero1 (r2 = 0.32, p < 0.001) and E. coli (r2 = 0.75, p