Recent Developments of Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction for Food

Jun 25, 2018 - Recent Developments of Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction for Food Applications: Extension to Polar Solutes. Nobuo Ochiai*† , Kikuo Sasamot...
0 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size
Subscriber access provided by Kaohsiung Medical University

Perspective

Recent developments of stir bar sorptive extraction for food applications: Extension to polar solutes Nobuo Ochiai, Kikuo Sasamoto, Frank David, and Pat Sandra J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • Publication Date (Web): 25 Jun 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on June 25, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 28

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Recent Developments of Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction for Food Applications: Extension to Polar Solutes

Nobuo Ochiai 1*, Kikuo Sasamoto 1, Frank David 2, and Pat Sandra 2 1. GERSTEL K.K. 1-3-1 Nakane, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-0031 Japan 2. Research Institute for Chromatography, President Kennedypark 26, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium

* Corresponding author: Dr. Nobuo Ochiai, GERSTEL K.K. Address: 1-3-1 Nakane, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-0031 Japan, Tel: +81-3-5731-5321, Fax: +81-3-5731-5322 email: [email protected]

1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 2 of 28

1

ABSTRACT

2

Stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) is a miniaturized and solvent-less sample

3

preparation method for extraction and concentration of organic compounds from

4

aqueous samples. The method is based on sorptive extraction, whereby the solutes are

5

extracted into a polymer such as polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) coated on a stir bar.

6

Using an apolar PDMS coating, SBSE provides high recoveries for apolar solutes,

7

SBSE recoveries for polar solutes are however low. Although several more polar

8

coatings for SBSE were developed, these extraction phases are mostly not compatible

9

with thermal desorption (TD) and/or have inferior performance characteristics related to

10

robustness, bleeding, stability, etc. compared to PDMS.

11

In this perspective paper, two recently introduced SBSE approaches are described that

12

can be used to extend the applicability of a PDMS coating to more polar solutes: (1)

13

SBSE with freeze concentration (Ice concentration linked with extractive stirrer:

14

ICECLES) which is based on the concentration of analytes by gradually reducing the

15

phase ratio (sample/extraction phase) and (2) SBSE using a solvent swollen PDMS

16

(solvent-assisted SBSE: SA-SBSE) which is based on a combination of polarity

17

modification and volume increase by PDMS phase swelling using certain types of

18

solvents, while maintaining the original characteristics of the PDMS phase.

19 20

Keywords: Stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE), Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), Food

21

applications, Polar solutes, SBSE with freeze concentration, SBSE with solvent swollen

22

PDMS.

2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 28

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

23

INTRODUCTION

24

Miniaturized and solvent-less (or solvent minimized) sample preparation methods have

25

been developed for isolation and extraction of trace organic compounds in food matrices

26

prior to chromatographic analysis, as they provide many benefits such as small sample

27

volume, high sample throughput, low operational cost, and low solvent consumption,

28

while maintaining or even improving sensitivity. For aqueous food samples, classical

29

solid phase extraction (SPE) is widely used for research and quality control, 1 however,

30

the enrichment factor (original sample amount versus final extract volume) obtained

31

with this technique is rather limited and either further concentration or large volume

32

injection (LVI) are required to achieve adequate sensitivity. Consequently, a certain

33

range of volatile compounds are also lost. Alternatively, also miniaturized forms of

34

liquid-liquid extraction (µLLE), such as single drop micro-extraction, hollow fiber

35

liquid-phase micro-extraction and dispersive liquid-liquid micro-extraction are currently

36

developed.

37

polarity and hydrophobicity of solutes. While enrichment factors can be significantly

38

high, these liquid-liquid extraction methods are not applicable to a wide polarity range

39

of volatile solutes and the extraction solvent can mask volatile solutes during gas

40

chromatographic analysis. Both SPE and µLLE methods are therefore mostly used for

41

target compound analysis, both in combination with gas chromatography-mass

42

spectrometry (GC-MS) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). 1, 2

43

Since two decades, solid phase microextraction (SPME)

44

extraction (SBSE)

2

Similar to SPE, the extraction principle of µLLE is mostly based on

5, 6

3, 4

and stir bar sorptive

are well-established and widely used sample preparation methods

3

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 4 of 28

45

for aqueous food samples. These solvent-less methods have identical principles and

46

allow both extraction and concentration in a single step. Moreover, these methods

47

provide enhanced sensitivity because the extracted fraction (on a coated fiber or a

48

coated stir bar) can be introduced quantitatively into a GC system by thermal desorption

49

(TD). However, extraction of polar/hydrophilic solutes at trace level is still a

50

challenging task because these methods are generally more selective towards

51

hydrophobic/apolar solutes, often resulting in a chromatographic profile which

52

discriminates polar versus apolar solutes. This is a serious limitation, especially in

53

aroma profiling of food samples whereby the delicate balance of relative concentrations

54

of apolar and polar solutes is crucial.

55

Although several phases with different selectivity, e.g. polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS),

56

PDMS/divinyl benzene (PDMS/DVB), PDMS/Carboxen, and polyacrylate, are

57

commercially available for SPME fibers, their sensitivities for polar/hydrophilic solutes

58

are still considered to be limited because of large phase ratio conditions, either due to

59

very small phase volume on the fiber (e.g. 0.5 µL for PDMS) or very large headspace

60

sample volume (HS-SPME). For SBSE, it is known that the analyte recovery in the

61

extraction phase (PDMS) is higher than that of SPME using the same phase because of

62

50-250 times larger phase volume on the stir bar (and thus a much smaller phase ratio

63

and more favorable recovery).

64

have been developed to extend the applicability of SBSE for polar/hydrophilic solutes. 7,

65

8

66

(LD) and/or have inferior performance characteristics related to robustness, bleeding,

5, 6

Several alternative phases with different polarities

However, these extraction phases are mostly only compatible with liquid desorption

4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 28

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

7

67

stability, etc. compared to PDMS.

A commercially available stir bar coated with

68

polyethyleneglycol-modified silicone (EG Silicone) can be used with TD-GC analysis

69

but the stir bar tends to encounter physical change on the coating when re-used several

70

times. Therefore, it is recommended to use this EG-silicone coated stir bar in

71

combination with a classical PDMS for stirring in a multi-stir bar approach. 9

72

Another approach to increase recovery of polar solutes with log Kow 3.0 can be extracted with high recovery, while polar/hydrophilic

128

solutes with log Kow m/z 152

27

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Page 28 of 28

TOC Graphics

28

ACS Paragon Plus Environment