Published on Web 01/07/2009
Redox-Activating Dip-Pen Nanolithography (RA-DPN) Adam B. Braunschweig, Andrew J. Senesi, and Chad A. Mirkin* Northwestern UniVersity, Department of Chemistry, 2145 Sheridan Road, EVanston, Illinois 60208 Received November 20, 2008; E-mail:
[email protected] The localized deposition of biological molecules is increasingly employed in materials applications,1 diagnostic screening,2 and genetic assays.3 Current commercial methods for generating DNA microarrays are limited in feature size to 1 µm for the direct synthesis of oligonucleotides up to 60 bp on a surface or ∼50 µm for oligonucleotides or proteins spotted on surfaces.4 Consequently, new lithographic methods capable of patterning biological molecules with submicrometer resolution are necessary. Contact printing,5 dippen nanolithography,6 (DPN) and polymer-pen lithograpy (PPL)7 have emerged as powerful tools for patterning surfaces on the subµm length scale because they can be used to transfer molecules directly to a surface rather than use energy to activate a surface in an indirect manner. The direct transfer of molecules has several advantages over photolithography and indirect scanning probe methods,8 including potentially reduced costs and time, the ability to pattern organic and biological molecules, and, in the case of DPN and PPL, arbitrary pattern design with the potential for massive parallelization. Indeed, DPN uses as many as 55 000 pens in a 1 cm2 cantilever array,9 and PPL now utilizes as many as 11 × 106 pens in a 3 in. wafer to pattern over square centimeter areas with sub-100 nm resolution. DPN, the highest resolution technique of the three aforementioned methods, involves the direct transfer of an ink from a coated atomic force microscope (AFM) tip to a substrate of interest and has been used to form patterns of alkanethiols, oligonucleotides, proteins, and viruses. Two limitations of DPN and PPL, however, are (1) the difficulty in transporting high molecular weight species or molecules with poor aqueous solubility through the meniscus to the surface and (2) the need to optimize individually the transport rates and tip inking methods of each molecule. An alternative strategy is to develop an electrochemically addressable surface that can be switched from active to inactive states during or just before a patterning event. Indeed, Yousaf, Mrksich and co-workers have developed10 ways of using electroactive and photoprotected quinones with alkanethiols adsorbed on gold to create surfaces that can be toggled between states inactive and active toward Diels-Alder or nitroxamine addition reactions with cyclopentadiene or nitroxamine-containing reagents. Several aspects of this important technique limit its widespread use, notably the lengthy synthesis of the photolabile protected quinone, the requirement of a photomask, which increases complexity and limits resolution, and the reliance on a Diels-Alder or nitroxamine reaction for surface immobilization, which necessitates labeling the target. Herein, we describe a more straightforward and high resolution method for using quinones to create redox switchable surfaces that can be patterned with reagents that contain a strong nucleophile. Moreover, this new technique, termed redox-activating DPN (RA-DPN), can be carried out on almost any type of surface, including insulators like Si/SiO2 and glass with many biorelevant structures, including unmodified proteins and amine-modified oligonucleotides. 922
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2009, 131, 922–923
Scheme 1
The RA-DPN method relies on the spatially resolved delivery of the oxidant, cerric ammonium nitrate (CAN), to a hydroquinone (HQ) surface by DPN, which reversibly switches the quinone moiety from the reduced HQ to the oxidized benzoquinone (BQ) state (Scheme 1). This redox chemistry, in turn, alters the reactivity of the quinone-rich surface in a highly localized manner. While the BQ form is susceptible to nucleophilic attack in Michael-type additions,11 HQ is not and acts as a passivating layer. Because both forms of the quinone are kinetically stable, the patterned surface can be immersed in a solution of a target containing any strong nucleophile, which will only react where the BQ form persists on the surface. The silane surface is prepared in only two steps, and features as small as 165 nm have been generated by RA-DPN. Importantly, this solution-based immobilization circumvents the transport optimization required for every different material patterned because the same oxidant is always delivered to the surface. In a proof-of-concept experiment, an aminated surface was formed12 by immersing an oxidized silicon wafer (525 nm SiO2 layer) in a 2% (v/v) solution of aminopropyl trimethoxysilane (APTMS) in dry toluene for 5 h in an oxygen-free environment. The resulting surface, upon exposure to an ethanolic solution of freshly sublimed 1,4-BQ, forms the BQ-terminated surface via Michael addition.13 To ink the cantilever arrays for RA-DPN with CAN, parafilm was used to sandwich the chip holding the array of 26 cantilevers (F26 pen array, NanoInk, Skokie, IL) so that the CAN solution deposited by micropippette would be localized on the cantilevers.14 Drying the array in an oven resulted in an even coating of the CAN oxidant on the tips, as evidenced by optical microscopy (see Supporting Information). To form patterns, the CAN coated tips were used in a DPN experiment to activate the HQ surface through local oxidation to BQ at a relative humidity of 40-60%. The hydrophilic nature of the substrate facilitates the formation of a meniscus15 and, as a result, the transport of the ink to the surfaces. The CAN inked arrays were washed with deionized water and immersed in a 10 µM solution of an oligonucleotide sequence, modified at the 5′ end with an amine and at the 3′ with a Cy3 fluorophore, for 2 h. The resulting oligonucleotide arrays could be imaged by epifluorescence microscopy (Figure 1A). 10.1021/ja809107n CCC: $40.75 2009 American Chemical Society
COMMUNICATIONS
been developed. This method avoids time-consuming optimization processes to pattern each additional species, can be used to pattern any material containing a strong nucleophile, and the relationship between dwell time and feature size is maintained. With the resolution demonstrated here, patterns of 50 000 spots of oligonucleotides and proteins could be made in a 100 × 100 µm2 grid. Acknowledgment. C.A.M. acknowledges the AFOSR, the NIH (for a Director’s Pioneer Award), and the NCI-CCNE program for financial support. A.B.B. is grateful to the NIH for financial support (1F32CA136148-01).
Figure 1. Fluorescence image of 16 × 21 pattern of (A) Cy3-labeled oligonucleotide and (B) AF549 labeled protein dot features assembled on an Si/SiO2 surface, prepared by the RA-DPN method with a 26 pen array.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental preparation and instrumentation. Surface characterization by XPS, ATR-FTIR, and Raman spectroscopy. Demonstration of surface switching by contact angle measurement. Fluorescence images. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org. References
Figure 2. (A) AFM topographical image of a series of oligonucleotide dots of increasing size created by varying dwell times (0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10 s, left to right) results in increasing spot size (350, 450, 500, 650, 740, 800, 830 nm). (B) Plot of dwell time vs feature area.
Similarly, arrays of dots consisting of proteins were also prepared by RA-DPN by immersing the patterned quinone surface for 2 h in a 50 µg mL-1 solution of the AF549 labeled protein cholera toxin β subunit, and arrays of proteins dots were observable by epifluorescence microscopy (Figure 1B). Presumably, Michael addition occurs between the BQ moieties on the surface and the lysine residues that occur frequently on the exterior of proteins, resulting in the immobilization of the proteins on the surface without prior labeling. Upon exposure to fluorophore-labeled complementary antibodies for the protein, binding was observed, demonstrating that the proteins maintain bioactivity. An important feature of DPN, which is maintained in RA-DPN, is the ability to form patterns on a large range of length scales with precise control over size by varying dwell time. Tip arrays inked with CAN were brought into contact with the HQ surface with dwell times ranging from 0.01 to 10 s. Fluorescence images show an increase in spot size as well as fluorescence intensity as the dwell time increases (see Supporting Information). AFM topographical images of these patterns confirm that as dwell time increases so too does the feature size (Figure 2), following the same growth rate predicted theoretically,15 with a diameter range from 350 to 830 nm, while maintaining a constant height. In conclusion, a novel method for using DPN to activate and deactivate features on hydroquinone functionalized surfaces has
(1) (a) Storhoff, J. J.; Mirkin, C. A. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 1849–1862. (b) Niemeyer, C. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4128–4158. (c) Groves, J. T.; Ulman, N.; Boxer, S. G. Science 1997, 275, 651–653. (2) (a) Razin, S. Mol. Cell. Probes 1994, 8, 497–511. (b) Hacia, J. G.; Brody, L. C.; Chee, M. S.; Fodor, S. P. A.; Collins, F. S. Nat. Genet. 1996, 14, 441–447. (b) Elgahanian, R.; Storhoff, J. J.; Mucic, R. C.; Letsinger, R. L.; Mirkin, C. A. Science 1997, 277, 1078–1081. (3) Schena, M. Microarray Analysis; Wiley-LISS: New Jersey, 2002. (4) (a) Lipshutz, R. J.; Fodor, S. P. A.; Gingeras, T. R.; Lockhar, D. J. Nat. Genet. 1999, 21, 20–24. (b) Pirrung, M. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1276–1289. (5) (a) Xia, Y.; Whitesides, G. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 550–575. (b) Chen, C. S.; Mrksich, M.; Huang, S.; Whitesides, G. M.; Ingber, D. E. Science 1997, 276, 1425–1428. (c) Rozkiewicz, D. I.; Brugman, W.; Kerkhoven, R. M.; Ravoo, B. J.; Reinhoudt, D. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 11593–11599. (6) (a) Piner, R. D.; Zhu, J.; Xu, F.; Hong, S.; Mirkin, C. A. Science 1999, 283, 661–663. (b) Sekula, S.; Fuchs, J.; Weg-Remers, S.; Nagel, P.; Schuppler, S.; Fragala, J.; Theilacker, N.; Franzreb, M.; Wingren, C.; Ellmark, P.; Borrebaeck, C. A. K.; Mirkin, C. A.; Fuchs, H.; Lenhert, S. Small 2008, 4, 1785–1793. (c) Rozhok, S.; Shen, C. K.-F.; Littler, P.-Y. H.; Fan, Z.; Liu, C.; Mirkin, C. A.; Holz, R. C. Small 2005, 1, 445–451. (7) Huo, F.; Zheng, Z.; Zheng, G.; Giam, L. R.; Zhang, H.; Mirkin, C. A. Science 2008, 321, 1658–1660. (8) (a) Maoz, R.; Cohen, S. R.; Sagiv, J. AdV. Mater. 1999, 11, 55–61. (b) Maoz, R.; Frydman, E.; Cohen, S. R.; Sagiv, J. AdV. Mater. 2000, 12, 424– 429. (c) Li, Y.; Maynor, B. W.; Liu, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2105– 2106. (9) Salaita, K.; Wang, Y.; Fragala, J.; Vega, R. A.; Liu, C.; Mirkin, C. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 43, 7220–7223. (10) (a) Yousaf, M. N.; Houseman, B. T.; Mrksich, M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98, 5992–5996. (b) Dillmore, W. S.; Yousaf, M. N.; Mrksich, M. Langmuir 2004, 7223–7231. (c) Yeo, W.-S.; Mrksich, M. Langmuir 2006, 22, 10816–10820. (d) Houseman, B. T.; Huh, J. H.; Kron, S. J.; Mrksich, M. Nat. Biotechnol. 2002, 20, 270–274. (e) Chan, E. W. L.; Yousaf, M. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15542–155546. (f) Chan, E. W. L.; Par, S.; Yousaf, M. N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 6267– 6271. (g) Wescott, N. P.; Yousaf, M. N. Langmuir 2008, 24, 2261–2265. (h) Hoover, D. K.; Chan, E. W. L.; Yousaf, M. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 3280–3281. (11) Bunimovich, Y. L.; Ge, G.; Beverly, D. C.; Ries, R. S.; Hood, L.; Heath, J. R. Langmuir 2004, 20, 10630–10638. (12) LeMieux, M. C.; Roberts, M.; Barman, S.; Jin, Y. W.; Kim, J. M.; Bao, Z. Science 2008, 321, 101–104. (13) Sarkar, S.; Sampath, S. Langmuir 2006, 22, 3388–3395. (14) Wang, W. M.; Stoltenberg, R. M.; Liu, S.; Bao, Z. ACS Nano 2008, 2, 2135–2142. (15) (a) Jang, J.; Hong, S.; Schatz, G. C.; Ratner, M. A. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 115, 2721–2729. (b) Weeks, B. L.; Noy, A.; Miller, A. E.; De Yoreo, J. J. Phys. ReV. Lett. 2002, 88, 255505–1.
JA809107N
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 131, NO. 3, 2009
923
