Regulation of Ash Fusibility Characteristics for High Ash Fusion

Subscriber access provided by Kaohsiung Medical University

Fossil Fuels

Regulation of Ash Fusibility Characteristics for High Ash Fusion Temperature Coal by Bean Straw Addition Xiuwei Ma, Fenghai Li, Mingjie Ma, Shanxiu Huang, Shaohua Ji, and Yitian Fang Energy Fuels, Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b01013 • Publication Date (Web): 16 May 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 16, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

1

Regulation of Ash Fusibility Characteristics for High Ash Fusion

2

Temperature Coal by Bean Straw Addition

3

Xiuwei Ma,†,‡ Fenghai Li,*,†,‡,§ Mingjie Ma,† Shanxiu Huang†, Shaohua Ji§, and Yitian Fang§

4 5 6

†

7 8

‡

9 10

College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan 454003, People,s Republic of China College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Heze University, Heze, Shandong 274015, People,s Republic of China §

State Key Laboratory of Coal Conversion, Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030001, People,s Republic of China

11

ABSTRACT: The effects of bean straw (BS) on ash fusion behaviors of coals (Jiaozuo (JZ) and

12

Zaozhuang (ZZ)) with high ash fusion temperature (AFT) and the regulating mechanism were

13

investigated from the perspectives of ash chemical composition and mineralogical property. The

14

results showed that the AFT of JZ ash mixture reduced with increasing the BS ash mass ratio;

15

while the AFT of ZZ ash mixture decreased rapidly (0–12%), then increased slowly (>12%). The

16

existence form of Al2O3 and SiO2 was converted from high melting point (MP) mullite into low

17

MP alumino-silicates and their eutectics with BS ash addition, leading to a decrease in AFT. With

18

increasing BS ash ratio, the major mineral reducing the AFT was changed from feldspar into

19

leucite. Magnesia spinel had a weaker effect on improving the AFT than that of mullite or quartz

20

due to their different molecular structures. The experimental ash samples were divided into three

21

categories based on the total contents of SiO2 and Al2O3 (A) (I: A ≥ 78.6%; II: 72.2% ≤ A< 78.6%;

22

III: 62.7% ≤ A < 72.2%). With the decreasing A content, the existing form of Na2O and K2O was

23

transformed from feldspar into leucite and nepheline; the CaO together with some FeO and MgO

24

was transformed from anorthite or cordierite into the more easily fusible melilite and

25

clinopyroxene.

26

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

27

1. INTRODUCTION

28

The co-utilizations of coal with biomass such as co-pyrolysis, co-combustion,

29

co-gasification, etc. have been recognized as a promising way to reduce the high dependence on

30

fossil fuels and environmental stress (e.g. global warming, ozone depletion, and acid rain).1–3

31

Meanwhile, it can optimize the product structure and avoid some operational problems.4,5 Among

32

all the co-utilization technologies, the co-gasification has attracted increasing attention, which

33

converts different kinds of biomass and coal into clean synthetic gas for generation of electricity,

34

synthetic liquid fuels, hydrogen, fuel cells, etc.6

35

Compared with the fixed-bed or fluidized-bed gasification technology, entrained-flow bed

36

(EF) gasification is generally operated on higher temperature and pressure, and the smaller

37

feedstock particles in EF gasifier are in a strong turbulent flow state.7 Therefore, during the EF

38

gasification, the difference of coal and biomass gasification reactivity is small and the carbon

39

conversion efficiency is high,8 which is more suitable for co-utilization of biomass with different

40

rank coals. However, EF gasifier has higher requirements for the viscosity and flow characteristics

41

of ash/slag, which is closely related to the feedstock ash fusion temperature (AFT).9,10 The molten

42

slag flow out of gasifier smoothly is the key factor to ensure the stable and long-term running of

43

EF gasifier. In a typical EF gasifier (e.g., GSP, Shell, and Texaco), the ash flow temperature (FT)

44

of feedstock is generally below 1380 oC and its viscosity is approximately in the range of 2.5–25

45

Pa·s at the operating temperatures between 1300 oC and 1500 oC. For high AFT coal (FT >1380

46

o

47

efficiency and the stable operation of gasification system.11 Improving the operating temperature

48

can mitigate the operational problem, however, this increases the additional consumption of

C), it is easy to cause ash deposition and slag blocking, which directly influences the gasification


Page 2 of 35

Page 3 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

49

oxygen and energy largely; and the lifetime of refractory materials is reduced if the temperature is

50

too high.12 Thus, in industrial practice, some measures (e.g. blending coal, fluxing agent, and

51

leaching) are generally used to regulate the ash fusion behaviors of high AFT coal to satisfy the

52

demands of slag tapping for EF gasifier.13,14

53

High AFT coal accounts for over 57% of Chinese coal.10 It is of great significance to

54

regulate these coals AFT to realize the clean and high efficiency utilization by EF gasification.

55

Biomass ash is highly rich in alkaline and alkaline earth oxides,15 therefore, the biomass is not

56

only the feedstock but also the fluxing agent to decrease coal AFT in their co-gasification process.

57

However, the mixed ash fusion behavior of coal and biomass is much different from the feedstock.

58

Although some AFT models have been established,16,17 most of them are not suitable for blended

59

ash directly, especially for the blended ash of coal with biomass because of the enormous

60

discrepancies in ash chemical compositions and the complex mineral reactions. Several

61

investigations have been performed on the mixed ash fusibility characteristics of coal with

62

biomass. Reinmöller et al.18 explored the mixed ash fusion behavior of German brown coal and

63

wheat straw: with the increasing biomass mass ratio, the deformation temperature (DT) of mixed

64

ash decreased rapidly, however, the hemispherical temperature (HT) and FT decreased when the

65

wheat straw mass ratio was from 0% to 50%, and then increased at the ratio of 50–100%. Fang et

66

al.19 investigated the AFT of bituminous coal and corn straw: the variations in four characteristic

67

temperatures (DT, softening temperature (ST), HT, and FT) showed a “V” shape trend with

68

increasing corn straw mass ratio. Xu et al.20 explored the blended ash flow behavior of straw and

69

Guizhou coal: the blended slag with 20% straw content was glassy type, and the operating

70

temperature range was higher than that of other blended ashes, which was more suitable for EF


Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

71

gasification. Chen et al.21 found that the biomass (cotton stalk and sargassum natans) with high

72

AFT could also be used to reduce the coal AFT to meet the requirements of EF gasifier slagging.

73

Most of the previous studies on blended ash fusibility characteristics were concentrated on

74

biomass and low-rank coals (usually have a low AFT).18,19,22,23 The explorations on the effect of

75

biomass on ash fusion behaviors of high AFT coal under reducing atmosphere were relatively less.

76

The present study investigated the influence of biomass on ash fusion behaviors of high AFT coal

77

and explored its variation mechanism through experiment (X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and X-ray

78

diffraction (XRD)) and theoretical calculation (FactSage software). It is expected to supply some

79

basic data and theoretical support for the developments of co-gasification technologies for

80

biomass and high AFT coal.

81

2. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

82

2.1. Raw Materials Quality Analysis

83

Two high AFT coals (Jiaozuo coal (JZ) and Zaozhuang coal (ZZ)) and bean straw (BS) were

84

used as experimental materials. The raw materials were pulverized and sieved to < 0.200 mm

85

before analyses. Proximate analyses (biomass: GB/T28731-2012; coal: GB/T212-2008) and

86

ultimate analyses (GB/T476-2001) of three samples were listed in Table 1. The contents of fixed

87

carbon and ash in two coals were higher than that of BS, however, the volatile matter content in

88

BS (65.27%) was higher evidently than that of coals (JZ: 7.24% and ZZ: 9.85%). Besides, BS had

89

a lower sulfur and nitrogen levels. Table 1 should be place here.

90 91 92

2.2. Preparation of Ash Samples Ash fusion behavior is influenced by the ashing temperature especially for biomass, the


Page 4 of 35

Page 5 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

93

ashing temperature of 500–600 oC can better reflect the chemical properties of biomass ash as the

94

volatility of Na and K is relatively less.19,24,25 Therefore, the ash samples of three raw materials

95

were prepared based on the standards ASTM E1755-01.21 Three raw samples in muffle furnace

96

were ashed under air atmosphere with the following procedure: initially the raw materials were

97

heated from room temperature to 250 oC with a heating rate of 10 oC /min and held for 30 min,

98

then the residues were heated up to 575 oC within 30 min and maintained for 3 h (for coals, the

99

time lasted for 6 h to guarantee the organic matters were burned entirely).26 Finally, the ash

100

samples were ground to a particle size less than 0.075 mm.

101

To compare the fluxing effects of BS on the two coal ashes and explore the mixed ash

102

fusion mechanism, the blended ash samples were prepared by adding BS ash into coal ash. The BS

103

ash mass ratios in ash mixtures were 6%, 12%, 18%, 24%, and 30%, respectively (BS mass ratio

104

(air-dry basis): 10.94%, 20.78%, 29.69%, 37.79%, and 45.19% for JZ; 9.19%, 17.77%, 25.81%,

105

33.35%, and 40.47% for ZZ). The prepared samples were put into a cabinet dryer for AFT

106

determination and further analyses.

107

Ash samples used for XRD analyses were prepared through the following steps: the ash

108

sample was added into ceramic crucible and heated in an ALHR-2 AFT auto-analyzer (Aolian Co.

109

Ltd., China) with a maximum temperature of 1500 oC. Mixed gas (H2/CO2, 1:1 volume ratio) was

110

introduced into the AFT analyzer to simulate the gasification atmosphere.6,13,27 As the target

111

temperature reached, the ceramic crucible was taken out and immediately immersed into ice water

112

to prevent the mineral phase transformation and crystal segregation of ash samples.28 The

113

quenched ash samples were taken out and crushed to < 0.075 mm.

114

2.3. AFT Measurements


Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

115

The AFTs were measured according to Chinese GB/T219-2008 standard. Triangular ash

116

cones with a bottom of 7 mm equilateral triangle and a height of 20 mm were heated in the AFT

117

auto-analyzer under reducing atmosphere. Ash cone was heated from room temperature to 900 oC

118

at the rate of 15 oC min–1, then changed into 5 oC min–1. The four characteristic temperatures (DT,

119

ST, HT, and FT) were recorded through the specific deformation of ash cone. The AFTs of three

120

raw materials were presented in Table 2, the FT increased in the order ZZ < BS < JZ. Their FTs

121

were higher than 1380 oC, indicating that they were not suitable for EF gasification directly from

122

the perspective of AFT.

123 124

Table 2 should be place here. 2.4. Characterization of Ash Samples

125

The ash chemical compositions of raw materials were tested using XRF-1800 spectrometer

126

(Shimadzu, Japan) with a Rh target X-ray tube under the conditions of 50 kV and 40 mA. The

127

minerals phases of ash samples were examined by D/max-rB X-ray powder diffractometer

128

(Rigaku, Japan) with Cu Kα radiation under the conditions of Kα1 = 0.15408 nm, 40 kV, and 100

129

mA; the scanning was conducted at 5o 2θ/min scanning speed in the 2θ range from 10o to 70o with

130

0.01o step size.26 Jade 5.0 software package was selected for peak identification.

131

Thermodynamic calculations were performed by FactSage software (version 7.1). The

132

equilibrium module together with the data base of FToxid and FactPS was used for predicting the

133

theoretical mineral compositions at different temperatures.29,30 The major ash chemical

134

compositions (SiO2, Al2O3, K2O, CaO, Na2O, MgO, and Fe2O3) were input into the calculation.

135

The calculation temperature was from 900 to 1500 oC with an interval of 20 °C. From the previous

136

investigations,31,32 Cl in biomass ash was mostly volatilized in form of sylvite (KCl) at high


Page 6 of 35

Page 7 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

137

temperature. Thus, based on the Cl content, the K2O content was optimized according to the

138

formula: K2O = (K2O)1– (K2O)2. Where (K2O)1 represented the original K2O content in ash

139

samples, (K2O)2 was the content of K2O required for the KCl formation. Besides, the Gibbs free

140

energy (∆G) of the important reactions at different temperatures was calculated by the reaction

141

module.

142

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

143

3.1. Variations in Coal AFT with Increasing BS Ash Blending Ratio

144

Figure 1 presented the AFT variations of coals (JZ and ZZ) with increasing the BS ash

145

mass ratio. Although the FTs of three raw materials were high, the FTs of coal and BS mixtures

146

were lower than that of each single one. The BS fluxing effect for ZZ was more efficient than that

147

of JZ. For JZ, while the DT and ST of the mixed ash increased slightly at 24%, the HT and FT

148

decreased gradually with increasing BS ash ratio (Figure 1a). When the BS ash mass ratio reached

149

18%, the FT of JZ mixed ash decreased to 1333 oC, which could satisfy the demand of EF gasifier

150

slag tapping. For ZZ, the AFT of mixed ash reduced obviously in the mass ratio of 0–12% (Figure

151

1b), the FT was lower than 1380 oC at 6%, and the FT decreased by 176 oC at ratio of 12%. With

152

the blending ratio increased continuously (>12%), the AFT increased slightly; while the FT (1292

153

o

154

among ZZ blended ashes was only 23 oC. In addition, the ash fusion temperature range (FT–DT)

155

of JZ or ZZ mixture reduced with increasing BS blending ratio. The narrow fusion range was not

156

beneficial for slag tapping, because the solidification might emerge rapidly with temperature

157

fluctuation.33 Thus, small BS blending ratio was more suitable for EF gasifier stable operation

158

under the precondition of normal slag tapping.

C) was substantially lower than 1380 oC at 30%, meanwhile, the maximum difference of FTs


Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

159 160

Figure 1 should be place here. 3.2. Influence of Base to Acid (B/A) Ratio on Ash Fusion Behaviors

161

Ash sample can be regarded as a network of tetrahedral silicates during its fusion process.

162

Therefore, the AFT is closely correlated to the proportion of network formers and its transformers.

163

The B/A ratio (B: the total content of Na2O, K2O, CaO, MgO, and Fe2O3; A: the total content of

164

SiO2, Al2O3, and TiO2) is a more accurate parameter to reveal the ash fusion behavior.27 The acidic

165

oxides (A) are prone to form larger polymeric networks of silicates or alumino-silicates through

166

the bridging oxygen bound (Si–O–Si) for their high ionic potentials, increasing the AFT. While the

167

basic components (B), as the network transformers, can convert the Si–O–Si into non-bridging

168

oxygen bound (O–Si) through Lewis acid–base reaction with anionic [SiO4]4– network,34 reducing

169

the AFT. Generally, the AFT is the lowest as the B/A is around 1 from the network theory; the

170

more the B/A deviates from 1, the higher the AFT is.29 Table 3 listed the ash chemical

171

compositions and B/A values of different ash samples, the B/A values of ash samples were < 1

172

except for BS (2.66). Compared to ZZ, the B/A value of JZ was lower, which meant the stability

173

of the silicate network in JZ was stronger than that of ZZ, resulting in a higher AFT of JZ. With

174

the rising of BS ash ratio, the B/A value of blended ash increased; BS ash rich in basic oxides

175

provided more O2– to depolymerize silicate network gradually through the following reaction:

176

[SinO3n+1]2(n+1)– + O2– → [Sin–1O3n–2]2n– + O2– ·········· + O2– → [SiO4]4–

177

The amount of Si–O–Si bound in silicate melt decreased with the basic oxide (O2–) addition, and

178

the amount of O–Si bound increased, thus, the large silicate network was depolymerized to low

179

polymers. In the presence of the basic oxides, the reaction would continue to occur, finally, the

180

silicate network was changed into neso-silicates. Therefore, the AFT reduced in the absence of the


Page 8 of 35

Page 9 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

181

large stable network. This might explain the coal AFT decrease with increasing the BS ash ratio.

182

The B/A value of JZ mixture was lower than that of ZZ mixture at the same BS blending ratio,

183

causing that the AFT of JZ mixture was higher than that of ZZ mixture except for the mixture with

184

30% BS ash. The slow AFT increase for ZZ (>12%) might be attributed to the modes of element

185

occurrence in minerals. The Cl in blended ash evaporated in form of KCl during ash fusion

186

process, causing that some K2O could not play the fluxing role.32 The B/A value of BS ash was >1,

187

the basic component destroyed the network adequately; the excessive basic components, such as

188

MgO and CaO with high melting point (MP) of 2852 oC and 2572 oC respectively, existed in the

189

form of oxides.35 Although K2O content was high in BS ash, it was prone to form kaliophilite

190

(KAlSiO4) with high MP (~1800 oC) as the contents of SiO2 and Al2O3 were low.26 This might be

191

the main reason for higher AFT of BS.

192

Table 3 should be place here.

193

3.3. Analysis of Mineralogical Properties During Ash Fusion

194

3.3.1. Mineral Evolution in Two Coal Ash Samples

195

Figure 2 presented the XRD patterns of two coal ashes under reducing atmosphere at

196

different temperatures. For the same mineral, its content variation can be approximately reflected

197

by the change of diffraction intensity.36 As illustrated in the Figure 2a, for the JZ ash, the Si and Al

198

were mainly existed in form of muscovite (KAl3Si3O11) and quartz (SiO2) at 1000 oC, the Ca and

199

Fe were existed in anhydrite (CaSO4) and hematite (Fe2O3), respectively. The hematite resulted

200

from the pyrite (FeS2) during ashing process. As the temperature increased to 1100 oC, the

201

diffraction intensity of quartz diminished and the diffraction peaks of muscovite, anhydrite, and

202

hematite disappeared along with the generations of mullite (Al6Si2O13), hercynite (FeAl2O4),


Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

203

gehlenite (Ca2Al2Si2O7), and anorthite (CaAl2Si2O8). The muscovite transformed into mullite.

204

Meanwhile, anhydrite and hematite converted to CaO and FeO, which reacted with Al2O3 and

205

SiO2 to form the two Ca-bearing minerals and hercynite. With the further increase in temperature,

206

the gehlenite and hercynite melted into amorphous phase; the diffraction intensity of quartz

207

decreased appreciably, which might react with Al2O3 to form mullite. The Si in mullite existed in

208

form of [SiO4]4–-tetrahedron,

209

[AlO6]9–-octahedron, and the [AlO4]5–-tetrahedron was the major existing form;37 the

210

[SiO4]4–-tetrahedron and [AlO4]5–-tetrahedron formed a stable double chain structure, resulting in

211

a high MP (~1860 oC). The high MP mullite and quartz (MP: ~1723 oC) became the major

212

minerals at 1300 oC, especially for the mullite,27 resulting in a high AFT of JZ.

the Al existed

in form of [AlO4]5–-tetrahedron and

213

Compared with JZ ash at 1000 oC, obvious diffraction peak of clay mineral containing Si

214

and Al was not detected in the ZZ ash (Figure 2b), because the clay mineral content was small and

215

mostly decomposed into other minerals, besides, the diffraction peak was also influenced by

216

crystal quality and other minerals.38 When the temperature reached 1100 oC, the hercynite

217

diffraction intensity was stronger than that of JZ for its high Fe2O3 content (10.87%); and the

218

diffraction peaks of sanidine (KAlSi3O8) and albite (NaAlSi3O8) were detected, while the mullite

219

was not observed. The important reactions during ash fusion process were presented in Table 4,

220

the ∆G of mullite formation (–18.06 kJ/mol) was higher markedly than that of feldspar formation

221

(anorthite: –133.60 kJ/mol; albite: –397.51kJ/mol; sanidine: –497.88 kJ/mol) at 1100 oC,

222

indicating the mullite formation needed more energy. With temperature continuing to increase

223

(>1100 oC), the feldspar (sanidine and albite) and hercynite transformed into amorphous matters,

224

and mullite produced. The diffraction intensity of the mullite in JZ ashes was stronger than that in


Page 10 of 35

Page 11 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

225

ZZ at 1200 oC and 1300 oC, causing that JZ had higher AFT than that of ZZ. Figure 2 should be place here.

226 227

3.3.2. Thermodynamic Calculations of Coal Ash Samples

228

FactSage software can predict mineral transformation behavior based on the ash chemical

229

compositions. Figure 3 showed the variations in theoretical mineral compositions and their

230

relative contents of coal ashes with increasing temperature. The major minerals of mullite,

231

anorthite, cordierite, and quartz formed during JZ ash fusion process (Figure 3a).

232

Magnesium-cordierite (Mg2Al4Si5O18) and ferro-cordierite (Fe2Al4Si5O18) were not identified by

233

XRD at 1100 oC (Figure 2a), which might result from the short reaction time. It was more

234

difficult to generate the cordierite compared with the other alumino-silicates containing basic

235

elements for its relative high ∆G at 1100 oC (magnesium-cordierite: –117.44 kJ/mol;

236

ferro-cordierite: –46.07 kJ/mol). Thus, longer time was needed for cordierite formation, while

237

kinetics was not taken into account in the calculation.33,39 As the temperature raised from 1000 oC

238

to 1300 oC, the mullite content increased and reached maximum at around 1300 oC; only a small

239

amount of mullite melted as the temperature was >1300 oC. The major theoretical minerals

240

occurred in ZZ ash fusion process were similar to JZ (Figure 3b), while the contents of cordierite,

241

feldspar, and hercynite were higher than that of JZ at the same temperature. The mullite was not

242

formed until the temperature above 1160 oC. As the temperature was >1100 oC, the fusible

243

cordierite and feldspar melted into liquid slag gradually. The mullite melting rate in ZZ ash was

244

faster than that in JZ, because the liquid slag in ZZ ash with more basic components had a lower

245

viscosity.21 The major theoretical minerals influencing the AFT was basically in accord with the

246

XRD results (Figure 2).


Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

247

Figure 3 should be place here.

248

Table 4 should be place here.

249

3.3.3. Variations in Mineral Composition with Increasing BS Ash Blending Ratio

250

AFT modification can be reflected by the variation in mineral species and their relative

251

contents at 1100 oC.26,27 Figure 4 illustrated the XRD patterns of coal mixed ashes with different

252

BS ash mass ratios at 1100 oC under reducing atmosphere. As shown in Figure 4a, when the

253

blending ratio was 6%, the diffraction intensities of quartz and mullite reduced evidently,

254

accompanied by the generation of albite with low MP (~1100 oC) and the increase in anorthite

255

content. The contents of basic components (CaO and Na2O) in JZ ash increased with BS ash

256

addition. Based on the acid-base theory, CaO and Na2O were basic constituents, Al2O3 was

257

regarded as neutral component, and SiO2 belonged to acidic component. Thus, in the presence of

258

CaO and Na2O, the abundance of Al2O3 and SiO2 in JZ ash preferentially reacted with them,

259

producing the Na-bearing mineral or Ca-bearing mineral instead of mullite. In addition, Ca2+ and

260

Na+ with lower ionic potential (20.20 nm–1 and 10.53 nm–1, respectively) could cause the rupture

261

of covalent bonds Al(1)–O(13) and Al(8)–O(13) in mullite and change its crystal lattice,

262

generating anorthite and albite.37 As the blending ratio reached 12%, the diffraction intensities of

263

anorthite and albite increased continuously; meanwhile, the gehlenite re-emerged, which reacted

264

with anorthite to form low MP eutectic. Compared with JZ ash, the contents of high MP minerals

265

diminished, causing the AFT to reduce. With the blending ratio continued to increase (≥18%),

266

K2O reacted with SiO2 and Al2O3 to produce low MP leucite (KAlSi2O6) (~1100 oC). The leucite

267

content increased evidently with a rise in blending ratio, which was attributed to its lower ∆G

268

(–489.12 kJ/mol) at 1100 oC;39 while the diffraction intensities of anorthite and albite reduced,


Page 12 of 35

Page 13 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

269

only a weak diffraction peak was detected at 30%. It was possible that the CaO and Na2O were

270

mostly transformed into amorphous phase at 1100 oC. Besides, minor amount of low MP

271

nepheline ((K,Na)AlSiO4) generated as the blending ratio was ≥ 24%. The total contents of low

272

MP minerals (especially for leucite) and amorphous matter increased and became the major

273

factor decreasing the AFT further (>12%).

274

As the BS ash mass ratio reached 12%, ZZ blended ash was mainly composed of anorthite,

275

quartz, albite, and hercynite (Figure 4b). Anorthite and albite reacted with quartz to form low MP

276

eutectics,21 resulting in AFT decrease. With the blending ratio increased continuously (≥18%), the

277

leucite generated and minor amounts of magnesia spinel (MgAl2O4) and forsterite (Mg2SiO4)

278

produced from the reaction (8) and (9) (Table 4). The formations of magnesia spinel and forsterite

279

required more energy for their high ∆G at 1100 oC (magnesia spinel:–32.22 kJ/mol; forsterite:

280

–59.61 kJ/mol).39 The two Mg-bearing minerals were high MP ionic crystal compound (magnesia

281

spinel, ~2135 oC; forsterite, ~1900 oC) due to their high lattice energies. In addition, magnesia

282

spinel was not easy to form low MP eutectics with other minerals, causing the AFT increase.40 The

283

two Mg-bearing minerals were not the high polymeric compounds and forsterite was a typical

284

neso-silicate, thus, the effect of improving AFT was weaker than that of mullite or quartz. A new

285

phase kaliophilite produced due to the abundance of K2O when BS ash ratio was 30%, which

286

could raise the AFT to some extent.26 However, the amounts of leucite and amorphous matter

287

increased markedly, leading to AFT not increasing greatly. From the mineralogical analysis

288

(Figure 4), the feldspar played a significant role in reducing the AFT when the blending ratio was

289

small (≤12%), while the leucite became the major fluxing mineral decreasing the AFT further at

290

higher blending ratio (>12%).


Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

291 292

Figure 4 should be place here. 3.3.4. Mineral Evolution in Mixed Ash Samples

293

Two coal mixed ashes (JZ+18%BS and ZZ+12%BS) were selected to investigate the

294

fluxing mechanism of BS ash, because the AFTs reduced markedly at the two blending ratios.

295

The XRD patterns of mixed ash at different temperatures under reducing atmosphere were shown

296

in Figure 5. As shown in Figure 5a, mineral phases of the JZ blended ash at 1000 oC were similar

297

to that of JZ ash. However, the modes of element occurrence were greatly different from JZ ash

298

at 1100 oC; the formation of mullite was inhibited, the large amounts of SiO2 and Al2O3 were

299

involved in the formation of fusible alumino-silicates (leucite, anorthite, albite, and gehlenite).

300

The diffraction intensities of anorthite and leucite increased when the temperature increased to

301

1200 oC; the ∆G of reactions (1) decreased from –131.64 kJ/mol to –137.71 kJ/mol with an

302

increasing temperature (1000–1300oC), and it decreased from –486.19 kJ/mol to –494.04 kJ/mol

303

for reactions (7), which indicated increasing temperature was beneficial to the formation of

304

anorthite and leucite. Meanwhile, the magnesia spinel generated at a relative high temperature,

305

corresponding to its high ∆G (1200 oC: –32.98 kJ/mol; 1300 oC: –33.77 kJ/mol). With the

306

temperature increased further, most of the crystal minerals melted into amorphous matter; the

307

major high MP mullite was replaced by magnesia spinel at 1300 oC compared with JZ ash. The

308

large amount of molten liquid phase resulted in the AFT decrease.13

309

In addition to the quartz, hematite, and anhydrite, the sanidine was identified in the ZZ

310

blended ash at 1000 oC (Figure 5b). With the temperature increased, the quartz diffraction

311

intensity diminished gradually. The sanidine transformed into amorphous state at 1100 oC and

312

hercynite generated. As the temperature was >1100 oC, the major minerals were similar to JZ


Page 14 of 35

Page 15 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

313

blended ash except for leucite. Comparing to the Figures 2 and 5, the diffraction intensities of

314

anorthite and albite increased firstly, then reduced with increasing temperature; while the

315

maximum diffraction intensity occurred at 1200 oC (for JZ and JZ blended ash) and 1100 oC (for

316

ZZ and ZZ blended ash), respectively. This because ZZ ash and ZZ blended ash had a higher

317

hercynite content, the hercynite reacted with feldspar to generate low MP eutectic in temperature

318

range of 1100 oC–1200 oC.6 Minor amount of magnesia spinel existed as the temperature

319

was >1200 oC. The large amount of low MP minerals and amorphous phase caused the ZZ AFT

320

decrease.

321 322

Figure 5 should be place here. 3.3.5. Thermodynamic Calculations of Mixed Ash Samples

323

Figures 6 and 7 showed the variations in theoretical mineral compositions and their relative

324

contents of mixed ash with increasing temperature. When the BS ash blending ratio was 6%

325

(Figure 6a) or 12% (Figure 6b), the minerals species emerged in JZ mixed ash fusion process were

326

similar to JZ ash (Figure 3a), while the contents of mullite and cordierite reduced at the same

327

temperature and the feldspar increased due to the increasing of basic oxide. As the blending ratio

328

increased continuously (Figure 6c–e), the mineral species changed markedly. The abundance of

329

SiO2 and Al2O3 were transformed into more easily fusible alumino-silicates instead of mullite and

330

cordierite. The feldspar and leucite were the major minerals dominating the ash fusion behavior at

331

ratio of 18%, which corresponded to the XRD results (Figure 4a). Along with the declining of the

332

feldspar, more clinopyroxene (Ca(Mg,Fe)Si2O6), nepheline ((Na,K)AlSiO4), and melilite

333

(Ca2(Mg,Fe)Si2O7, Ca2Al2SiO7) formed; they were the complex alumino-silicates containing basic

334

ions with the same valence, which was prone to form the low MP eutectic. All the minerals


Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

335

transformed into liquid slag at 1360 oC as the blending ratio was ≥18%, while their melting rates

336

were accelerated as the temperature was >1100 oC, causing the AFT decrease further.

337

Figure 6 should be place here.

338

When the BS ash blending ratio was 6% for ZZ, the mineral species was consistent with the

339

JZ mixture with 12% BS ash. A small amount of corundum (Al2O3) was precipitated, because

340

more SiO2 was involved in the feldspar formation with BS ash addition (Figure 6b and Figure 7a),

341

and there was no excessive FeO or MgO reacting with Al2O3 to produce spinel.32 With the BS ash

342

blending ratio increased, more easily fusible alumino-silicates (olivine, nepheline, clinopyroxene,

343

and melilite) formed and melted quickly at the temperature interval of 1050 oC–1100 oC, resulting

344

in an increase in liquid slag (Figure 7c–e). While the high MP magnesia spinel melted slowly with

345

increasing temperature. As can be seen from Figures 6 and 7 that the major fusion temperature

346

range of minerals except for spinel reduced with an increasing BS ash ratio. This might explain

347

the ∆T of coal mixture diminished with increasing BS ash ratio (Figure 1), because the AFT was

348

determined by the proportion of solid and liquid phase in ash cone.7

349 350

Figure 7 should be place here. 3.4. Variations in Element Existence Form with BS Ash Addition

351

The modes of element occurrence influenced the ash fusion behavior greatly, which was

352

closely correlated to the total contents of SiO2 and Al2O3 (A) according to the XRD analyses and

353

theoretical calculations. Most of the high AFT coal had a high A content; JZ and ZZ were the

354

representative high AFT coals with different A contents. Thus, on the basis of the A content

355

variation, the experimental ash samples were divided into three categories approximately. Three

356

mean values of A contents (JZ and ZZ, JZ+12%BS and ZZ+12%BS, JZ+30%BS and


Page 16 of 35

Page 17 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

357

ZZ+30%BS) were selected as the breaking points respectively, and the corresponding element

358

existence forms were listed in Table 5, which was more efficient to guide the biomass selection

359

and blending ratio determination for co-gasification of high AFT coal with biomass.

360

The major oxides in coal ash were recombined with BS ash addition. As the A content

361

was high (A ≥ 78.6%; the first category), the Al2O3 and SiO2 existed mostly in form of mullite

362

and regulate the ash fusion behavior. Most of the other minerals were alumino-silicates; the small

363

amounts of CaO, K2O, and Na2O existed in feldspar and the main existence form of MgO and

364

FeO was cordierite, while their fluxing effect was weaker due to stable alumino-silicate network.

365

As the A content was moderate (72.2% ≤ A < 78.6%; the second category), most of Al2O3 and

366

SiO2 were combined with basic oxides to form the large amount of feldspar due to the less

367

energy demand, which became the most important mineral reducing the AFT. Some MgO and

368

FeO existed in form of spinel, the cordierite content decreased gradually with decreasing A

369

content. When the A content was low (62.7% ≤ A < 72.2%; the third category), the modes of

370

element occurrence changed greatly. The existence form of K2O and Na2O was transformed from

371

feldspar into leucite and nepheline, the leucite became the major mineral to decrease the AFT

372

continuously; their contents increased with increasing the basic component content. While the

373

CaO together with some MgO and FeO was converted into the clinopyroxene and melilite, which

374

melted at relative low temperature. The spinel content increased slowly. Table 5 should be place here.

375 376

4. CONCLUSION

377

BS can effectively reduce the AFT of JZ or ZZ for its abundance of basic components. The

378

AFT variation was greatly influenced by the ash chemical compositions and their existence form.


Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

379

In the presence of basic composition, the SiO2 and Al2O3 preferentially reacted with them to

380

generate low MP minerals (feldspar, gehlenite, nepheline, and leucite) instead of high MP mullite

381

based on the thermodynamic calculation, resulting in coal AFT decrease. As the MgO existed in

382

the form of magnesia spinel and forsterite, the AFT increased slightly. The classification of ash

383

samples provided a good method to understand the mineral evolution mechanism during

384

co-gasification of biomass with high AFT coal.

385

AUTHOR INFORMATION

386

Corresponding Author

387

*Telephone: +86-0530-5668162. E-mail: [email protected]

388

Notes

389

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

390

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

391

This research was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong

392

Province, China(ZR2018MB037), Youth Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province, China

393

(Y5SJ1A1121), and the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

394

(XDA07050103).

395

REFERENCES

396

(1) Ellis, N.; Masnadi, M. S.; Roberts, D. G.; Kochanek, M. A.; Ilyushechkin, A. Y. Mineral matter interactions

397

during co-pyrolysis of coal and biomass and their impact on intrinsic char co-gasification reactivity. Chem. Eng. J.

398

2015, 279, 402–408.

399

(2) Wei, J.; Gong, Y.; Guo, Q.; Ding, L.; Wang, F.; Yu, G. Physicochemical evolution during rice straw and coal

400

co-pyrolysis and its effect on co-gasification reactivity. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 227, 345–352.

401

(3) Zhao, X.; Ren, J.; Cao, J.; Wei, F.; Zhu, C.; Fan, X.; Zhao, Y.; Wei, X. Catalytic reforming of volatiles from

402

biomass pyrolysis for hydrogen-rich gas production over limonite ore. Energy Fuels, 2017, 31, 4054−4060.


Page 18 of 35

Page 19 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

403

(4) Li, F.; Fang, Y. Modification of ash fusion behavior of lignite by the addition of different biomasses. Energy

404

Fuels 2015, 29, 2979–2986.

405

(5) Satyam Naidu, V.; Aghalayam, P.; Jayanti, S. Synergetic and inhibition effects in carbon dioxide gasification of

406

blends of coals and biomass fuels of Indian origin. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 209, 157–165.

407

(6) Li, F.; Fan, H.; Fang, Y. Investigation on the regulation mechanism of ash fusion characteristics in coal blending.

408

Energy Fuels 2017, 31, 379–386.

409

(7) Bai, J.; Kong, L.; Li, H.; Guo, Z.; Bai, Z.; Yuchi, W.; Li, W. Adjustment in high temperature flow property of

410

ash from Shanxi typical anthracite. J. Fuel Chem. Technol. 2013, 41, 805–813.

411

(8) Tremel, A.; Becherer, D.; Fendt, S.; Gaderer, M.; Spliethoff, H. Performance of entrained flow and fluidised

412

bed biomass gasifiers on different scales. Energy Convers. Manage. 2013, 69, 95–106.

413

(9) Ye, I.; Ryu, C.; Koo, J. H. Influence of critical viscosity and its temperature on the slag behavior on the wall of

414

an entrained coal gasifier, Appl. Therm. Eng. 2015, 87, 175–184.

415

(10) Li, J.; Du, M.; Zhang, Z.; Guan, R.; Chen, Y.; Liu, T. Selection of fluxing agent for coal ash and investigation

416

of fusion mechanism: a first-principles study. Energy Fuels 2009, 23, 704–709.

417

(11) Wang, Z.; Bai, J.; Kong, L.; Bai, Z.; Li, W. Effect of V and Ni on ash fusion temperatures. Energy Fuels 2013,

418

27, 7303–7313.

419

(12) Guo, Q.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, F.; Yu, G. Slag properties of blending coal in an industrial OMB coal water slurry

420

entrained-flow gasifier. Energy Convers. Manage. 2014, 86, 683–688.

421

(13) Li, F.; Li, M.; Fan, H.; Fang, Y. Understanding ash fusion and viscosity variation from coal blending based on

422

mineral interaction. Energy Fuels 2018, 32, 132–141.

423

(14) Kong, L.; Bai, J.; Li, W.; Wen, X.; Li, X.; Bai, Z.; Guo, Z.; Li, H. The internal and external factor on coal ash

424

slag viscosity at high temperatures, Part 3: Effect of CaO on the pattern of viscosity–temperature curves of slag.

425

Fuel 2016, 179, 10–16.

426

(15) Boström, D.; Skoglund, N.; Grimm, A.; Boman, C.; Öhman, M.; Broström, M.; Backman, R. Ash

427

transformation chemistry during combustion of biomass. Energy Fuels 2012, 26, 85–93.

428

(16) Sasi, T.; Mighani, M.; Örs, E.; Tawani, R.; Gräbner, M. Prediction of ash fusion behavior from coal ash

429

composition for entrained-flow gasification. Fuel Process. Technol. 2018, 176, 64–75.

430

(17) Song, W.; Tang, L.; Zhu, X.; Wu, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Koyama, S. Prediction of Chinese coal ash fusion temperatures

431

in Ar and H2 atmospheres. Energy Fuels 2009, 23, 1990–1997.

432

(18) Zhang, G.; Reinmöller, M.; Klinger, M.; Meyer, B. Ash melting behavior and slag infiltration into alumina


Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

433

refractory simulating co-gasification of coal and biomass. Fuel 2015, 139, 457–465.

434

(19) Fang, X.; Jia, L. Experimental study on ash fusion characteristics of biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 104,

435

769–774.

436

(20) Xu, J.; Yu, G.; Liu, X.; Zhao, F.; Chen, X.; Wang, F. Investigation on the high-temperature flow behavior of

437

biomass and coal blended ash. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 166, 494–499.

438

(21) Chen, X.; Tang, J.; Tian, X.; Wang, L. Influence of biomass addition on Jincheng coal ash fusion temperatures.

439

Fuel 2015, 160, 614–620.

440

(22) Haykiri-Acma, H.; Yaman, S.; Kucukbayrak, S.; Morcali, M. H. Does blending the ashes of chestnut shell and

441

lignite create synergistic interaction on ash fusion temperatures? Fuel Process. Technol. 2015, 140, 165–171.

442

(23) Liu, H.; Xu, M.; Zhang, Q.; Zhao, H.; Li, W. Effective utilization of water hyacinth resource by co-gasification

443

with coal: rheological properties and ash fusion temperatures of hyacinth-coal slurry. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52,

444

16436–16443.

445

(24) Xiao, R.; Chen, X.; Wang, F.; Yu, G. The physicochemical properties of different biomass ashes at different

446

ashing temperature. Renewable Energy 2011, 36, 244–249.

447

(25) Li, Q. H.; Zhang, Y. G.; Meng, A. H.; Li, L.; Li, G. X. Study on ash fusion temperature using original and

448

simulated biomass ashes. Fuel Process. Technol. 2013, 107, 107–112.

449

(26) Ma, X.; Li, F.; Ma, M.; Fang, Y. Investigation on blended ash fusibility characteristics of biomass and coal with

450

high silica–alumina. Energy Fuels 2017, 31, 7941–7951.

451

(27) Li, F.; Fang, Y. Ash fusion characteristics of a high aluminum coal and its modification. Energy Fuels 2016, 30,

452

2925–2931.

453

(28) Chen, X.; Kong, L.; Bai, J.; Bai, Z.; Li, W. Study on fusibility of coal ash rich in sodium and sulfur by synthetic

454

ash under different atmospheres. Fuel 2017, 202, 175–183.

455

(29) Reinmöller, M.; Klinger, M.; Schreiner, M.; Gutte, H. Relationship between ash fusion temperatures of ashes

456

from hard coal, brown coal, and biomass and mineral phases under different atmospheres: A combined FactSage™

457

computational and network theoretical approach. Fuel 2015, 151, 118–123.

458

(30) Carlsson, P.; Ma, C.; Molinder, R.; Weiland, F.; Wiinikka, H.; Öhman, M.; Öhrman, O. Slag formation during

459

oxygen-blown entrained-flow gasification of stem wood. Energy Fuels 2014, 28, 6941–6952.

460

(31) Li, H.; Han, K.; Wang, Q.; Lu, C. Influence of ammonium phosphates on gaseous potassium release and

461

ash-forming characteristics during combustion of biomass. Energy Fuels 2015, 29, 2555‒2563.

462

(32) Ma, X.; Li, F.; Ma, M.; Fang, Y. Fusion characteristics of blended ash from Changzhi coal and biomass. J. Fuel


Page 20 of 35

Page 21 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

463

Chem. Technol. 2018, 46, 129–137.

464

(33) Yan, T.; Bai, J.; Kong, L.; Bai, Z.; Li, W.; Xu, J. Effect of SiO2/Al2O3 on fusion behavior of coal ash at high

465

temperature. Fuel 2017, 193, 275–283.

466

(34) Hsieh, P. Y.; Kwong, K.; Bennett, J. Correlation between the critical viscosity and ash fusion temperatures of

467

coal gasifier ashes. Fuel Process. Technol. 2016, 142, 13–26.

468

(35) Liu, B.; He, Q.; Jiang, Z.; Xu, R.; Hu, B. Relationship between coal ash composition and ash fusion

469

temperatures. Fuel 2013, 105, 293–300.

470

(36) Ibáñez, J.; Font, O.; Moreno, N.; Elvira, J. J.; Alvarez, S.; Querol, X. Quantitative Rietveld analysis of the

471

crystalline and amorphous phases in coal fly ashes. Fuel 2013, 105, 314–317.

472

(37) Wu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, T.; Fan, J.; Piao, G.; Kobayashi, N.; Mori, S.; Itaya, Y. Main mineral

473

melting behavior and mineral reaction mechanism at molecular level of blended coal ash under gasification

474

condition. Fuel Process. Technol. 2010, 91, 1591–1600.

475

(38) Deng, H.; Ren, Q.; Zhang, Y. Melting characteristics of fine ash from circulating fluidized bed gasifier. J.

476

Fuel Chem. Technol. 2018, 46, 273–282.

477

(39) Wang, Y.; Xiang, Y.; Wang, D.; Dong, C.; Yang, Y.; Xiao, X.; Lu, Q.; Zhao, Y. Effect of sodium oxides in ash

478

composition on ash fusibility. Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 1437–1444.

479

(40) Deng, C.; Zhang, C.; Tan, P.; Fang, Q.; Chen, G. The Melting and transformation characteristics of minerals

480

during co-combustion of coal with different sludges. Energy Fuels 2015, 29, 6758–6767.


Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Table Captions Table 1. Proximate and Ultimate Analyses of Raw Materials. Table 2. Ash Fusion Temperatures of Raw Materials (oC). Table 3. Ash Chemical Compositions of Different Ash Samples and the B/A Values (wt%). Table 4. Major Reactions during Ash Fusion Process and Their Gibbs Free Energy at Different Temperatures. Table 5. The Modes of Element Occurrence at Different Classifications Based on Total Contents of SiO2 and Al2O3.


Page 22 of 35

Page 23 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

Table 1 Proximate and Ultimate Analyses of Raw Materials. proximate analysis on an air-dry basis (wt/%) sample

moisture

ash

JZ

1.33

16.58

ZZ

2.61

BS

4.21

a Calculated b Total

volatile

ultimate analysis on a dry and ash-free basis (wt/% )

fixed carbon

C

H

Oa

Sb

N

7.24

74.85

87.94

3.08

5.48

2.36

1.14

13.66

9.85

73.88

83.86

6.95

6.99

1.57

0.63

8.62

65.27

21.90

51.16

8.22

40.15

0.10

0.37

matter

by difference.

sulfur.


Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 24 of 35

Table 2 Ash Fusion Temperatures of Raw Materials (oC).

a

sample

DTa

STb

HT c

FT d

JZ

1486

>1500

>1500

>1500

ZZ

1375

1400

1420

1445

BS

1401

1430

1440

1451

deformation temperature. b softening temperature. c hemispherical temperature. d flow temperature.


Page 25 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

Table 3 Ash Chemical Compositions of Different Samples and the B/A Values (wt%). sample

SiO2

Al2O3

Fe2O3

CaO

MgO

SO3

K 2O

Na2O

TiO2

P2O5

Cl

B/A

JZ

49.06

33.84

5.32

4.95

0.86

2.10

1.04

1.06

1.36

0.41

-

0.16

ZZ

42.10

32.17

10.87

6.09

2.46

2.44

0.80

0.75

1.17

1.15

-

0.28

BS

16.16

9.41

4.95

19.32

10.27

3.02

28.91

5.16

0.27

1.47

1.06

2.66

JZ+6%BS

47.09

32.37

5.30

5.81

1.42

2.16

2.71

1.31

1.29

0.48

0.06

0.20

JZ+12%BS

45.11

30.91

5.28

6.67

1.99

2.21

4.38

1.55

1.23

0.54

0.13

0.26

JZ+18%BS

43.14

29.44

5.25

7.54

2.55

2.27

6.06

1.80

1.16

0.60

0.19

0.31

JZ+24%BS

41.16

27.98

5.23

8.40

3.12

2.32

7.73

2.04

1.10

0.67

0.25

0.38

JZ+30%BS

39.19

26.51

5.21

9.26

3.68

2.38

9.40

2.29

1.03

0.73

0.32

0.45

ZZ+6%BS

40.54

30.80

10.51

6.88

2.93

2.48

2.49

1.01

1.12

1.18

0.06

0.33

ZZ+12%BS

38.99

29.44

10.16

7.68

3.40

2.50

4.17

1.28

1.06

1.19

0.13

0.38

ZZ+18%BS

37.43

28.07

9.80

8.47

3.87

2.54

5.86

1.54

1.01

1.22

0.19

0.44

ZZ+24%BS

35.87

26.71

9.45

9.27

4.33

2.58

7.55

1.81

0.95

1.23

0.25

0.51

ZZ+30%BS

34.32

25.34

9.09

10.06

4.80

2.61

9.23

2.07

0.90

1.26

0.32

0.58

B/A value = (Fe2O3+ CaO + MgO + K2O + Na2O)/(SiO2 + Al2O3 + TiO2).


Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 26 of 35

Table 4 Major Reactions during Ash Fusion Process and Their Gibbs Free Energy at Different Temperatures. ∆G/ kJ/mol

reaction

1000 oC

1100 oC

1200 oC

1300 oC

(1)

CaO + Al2O3 + 2SiO2→CaAl2Si2O8 (anorthite)

‒131.64

‒133.60

‒135.62

‒137.71

(2)

Al2O3 + Na2O + 6SiO2→ 2NaAlSi3O8 (albite)

‒395.71

‒397.51

‒396.89

‒395.08

(3)

Al2O3 + K2O + 6SiO2→ 2KAlSi3O8 (sanidine)

‒497.26

‒497.88

‒498.37

‒498.77

(4)

3Al2O3 + 2SiO2→ Al6Si2O13 (mullite)

‒15.40

‒18.06

‒20.70

‒23.33

(5)

2Al2O3 + 2FeO + 5SiO2→ Fe2Al4Si5O18 (magnesium-cordierite)

‒43.76

‒46.07

‒48.37

‒50.62

(6)

2Al2O3 + 2MgO + 5SiO2→ Mg2Al4Si5O18 (ferro-cordierite)

‒115.06

‒117.44

‒119.87

‒122.38

(7)

Al2O3 + K2O + 4SiO2→ 2KAlSi2O6 (leucite)

‒486.19

‒489.12

‒491.73

‒494.04

(8)

MgO + Al2O3→ MgAl2O4 (spinel)

‒31.49

‒32.22

‒32.98

‒33.77

(9)

2MgO + SiO2→ Mg2SiO4 (forsterite)

‒60.11

‒59.61

‒59.16

‒58.75


Page 27 of 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

Table 5 The Modes of Element Occurrence at Different Classifications Based on Total Contents of SiO2 and Al2O3. classification

major minerals

content variation

Mullite (Al6Si2O13)▲b

↓c

I

Quartz (SiO2)

↓

(Aa ≥ 78.6%)

Cordierite (Fe2Al4Si5O18, Mg2Al4Si5O18)

↓

Feldspar (CaAl2Si2O8, KAlSi3O8, NaAlSi3O8)

↑d

Hercynite (FeAl2O4)

↑

Feldspar (CaAl2Si2O8, KAlSi3O8, NaAlSi3O8) ▲

↑

Mullite (Al6Si2O13)

↓

Quartz (SiO2)

↓

Cordierite (Fe2Al4Si5O18, Mg2Al4Si5O18)

↓

Hercynite (FeAl2O4)

↓

Magnesia spinel (MgAl2O4)

↑

Leucite ((KAlSi2O6) ▲

↑

Nepheline ((Na,K)AlSiO4)

↑

II ash

(72.2% ≤ A < 78.6%)

samples

III (62.7% ≤ A < 72.2%)

Clinopyroxene (Ca(Mg,Fe)Si2O6)

↑

Melilite (Ca2(Mg,Fe)Si2O7, Ca2Al2SiO7)

↑

Magnesia spinel (MgAl2O4)

↑

Feldspar (CaAl2Si2O8, KAlSi3O8, NaAlSi3O8)

↓

a

the total mass ratio of Al2O3 and SiO2.

b

The most important mineral influencing the AFT.

c

The content decreases with the declining of Al2O3 and SiO2.

d

The content increases with the declining of Al2O3 and SiO2.


Energy & Fuels 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Figure captions Figure 1. AFT variation of coal with different BS ash mass ratios. Figure 2. XRD patterns of coal ash at different temperatures. Figure 3. Phase assemblage–temperature curves for coal ash. Figure 4. XRD patterns of mixed ash with different BS ash mass ratios at 1100 oC. Figure 5. XRD patterns of mixed ash at different temperatures. Figure 6. Phase assemblage–temperature curves for JZ blended ash. Figure 7. Phase assemblage–temperature curves for ZZ blended ash.


Page 28 of 35

Page 29 of 35

DT ST HT FT

1500

o

Temperature / C

1400

1300

1200

1100

0

6

12

18

24

30

BS ash mass ratio /%

(a) DT ST HT FT

1400

o

Temperature / C

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

1300

1200

1100

0

6

12

18

24

30

BS ash mass ratio /%

(b) Figure 1. AFT variation of coal with different BS ash mass ratios. (a) JZ; (b) ZZ.


Energy & Fuels

4000

1

5

1

1

1

85

5

5

5

5

1

0

1

1000

1

5 1100

5

5 5

o

1 5 8 7 56 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 8 55 5 5 5 5 5

2

C

8

2

tur e/

55

1

1000

23 3

mp era

55

1

1200

Te

4

2000

2

1

Intensity/cps

3000

5 1300

10

20

30

40

2-Theta/

50

o

60

70

(a) 1

4000

2000

8

3 2 3

9 1 8+10 810 6 6

1

tur e/

1100

5 1

1200

55

0

1

1000

1

1 5 8+10 5 1810 56 5 5 1

1 3

o

3

C

1 2

5

mp era

1

Intensity/cps

6000

Te

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 30 of 35

5 1300

10

20

30

40 o

2-Theta/

50

60

70

(b) Figure 2. XRD patterns of coal ash at different temperatures. (a) JZ; (b) ZZ. 1 Quartz (SiO2); 2 Anhydrite (CaSO4); 3 Hematite (Fe2O3); 4 Muscovite (KAl3Si3O11); 5 Mullite (Al6Si2O13); 6 Hercynite (FeAl2O4); 7 Gehlenite (Ca2Al2SiO7); 8 Anorthite (CaAl2Si2O8); 9 Sanidine (KAlSi3O8); 10 Albite (NaAlSi3O8).


Page 31 of 35

100

Quartz

90 80

Relative mass /%

70

Magnesium-cordierite Slag

60

Ferro-cordierite

50

Anorthite

40

Sanidine

30

Albite

20 10

Mullite

0 900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

o

Temperature/ C

(a) 100

Orthopyroxene Magnesium-cordierite

90 80

Slag

70

Relative mass /%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

Ferro-cordierite

60 50 40

Anorthite

30

Sanidine

20

Albite Hercynite

10 0 900

1000

Mullite 1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

o

Temperature/ C

(b) Figure 3. Phase assemblage–temperature curves for coal ash. (a) JZ; (b) ZZ.


Energy & Fuels

1

2000

20

1

30

40 o

2-Theta/

60

70

0 0

12

o/%

6

18 24

50

2 2

4 8

5+6 10

1000

5 3 4 23 2 2 2 2 2 5+6 2 2 11 5 3 2 3 22 1 2 5+6 5 4 23 2 77 5+6 7 17 5 4 7 6 7 5+6 4 7 7 8 1 56

as hm as sr at i

7

2

BS

1 2 1

Intensity/cps

3000

30

(a) 5000

3000

15

1 5 5+6 3 6 5+6 1 3 1 56 7 7 7 5+6 7 1 56 11 9 7 1 5+6 7 7 11 9 7 56 12 11 9 7 10

20

30

40 o

2-Theta/

50

2000

3

1000

3 1

3

3

0

3

0 6 12

18 24

60

70

o/ %

1

10 5

as hm as sr at i

1

Intensity/cps

4000

1

BS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 32 of 35

30

(b) Figure 4. XRD patterns of mixed ash with different BS ash mass ratios at 1100 oC. (a) JZ; (b) ZZ. 1 Quartz (SiO2); 2 Mullite (Al6Si2O3); 3 Hercynite (FeAl2O4); 4 Gehlenite (Ca2Al2SiO7); 5 Anorthite (CaAl2Si2O8); 6 Albite (NaAlSi3O8); 7 Leucite (KAlSi2O6); 8 Nepheline ((K,Na)AlSiO4); 9 Magnesia spinel (MgAl2O4); 10 Sanidine (KAlSi3O8); 11 Forsterite (Mg2SiO4); 12 Kaliophilite (KAlSiO4).


Page 33 of 35

2500

1

1500

3

1000

4 1

3

1 5 6+7 5 51 8 6 51 7 6 5 6+7 5 7 8 9 1 9 1

3

1

0 1000

9

1200

9

o

1100

9

C

1

m pe ra tu re /

9

500

24 2

Te

1

Intensity/cps

2000

1300 10

20

30

40o

50

2-Theta/

60

70

(a)

2000

67 1

1

6+7 9

22

3

1 2

0 1000

11

1

6+7 9 9

1100 o

C

1 67

3

6+7

6 1 1 7

1000

10

1200

9

tur e/

1

mp era

3

1

Intemsity/cps

3000

1

Te

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

1250 10

20

30

40o

2-Theta/

50

60

70

(b) Figure 5. XRD patterns of mixed ash at different temperatures. (a) JZ + 18%BS;

(b) ZZ + 12% BS.

1 Quartz (SiO2); 2 Hematite (Fe2O3); 3 Anhydrite (CaSO4); 4 Muscovite (KAl3Si3O11); 5 Leucite (KAlSi2O6); 6 Anorthite (CaAl2Si2O8); 7 Albite (NaAlSi3O8); 8 Gehlenite (Ca2Al2SiO7); 9 Spinel (MgAl2O4); 10 Sanidine (KAlSi3O8); 11 Hercynite (FeAl2O4).


Energy & Fuels

100

100

Hercynite

90

Ferro-cordierite

Relative mass /%

60

Anorthite

40 30

Sanidine

20

50

30

0 900

1000

Anorthite

40

Sanidine

10

Mullite 1100

1200

1300

1400

Slag

60

20

Albite

10

Spinel

70

Slag

50

Ferro-cordierite

80

Magnesium-cordierite

70

Magnesium-cordierite

90

Relative mass /%

80

Albite

Mullite

0

1500

900

1000

1100

o

100

80

(a)

(b) 100

Relative mass /%

Anorthite

40

Sanidine

Nepheline

50

Leucite

40 30

1000

Anorthite Sanidine

10

Spinel 1100

1300

1400

900

1500

Albite

Spinel

0 1200

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

o

o

Temperature/ C

Temperature/ C

(c)

(d)

100

Olivine

90

Clinopyroxene 80 Melilite 70

Relative mass /%

900

Slag

60

20

Albite

0

Clinopyroxene

70

Slag

10

Slag

Nepheline

60 50

Feldapar

40 30

Leucite

20 10

Spinel

0 900

1500

Olivine

80

60

20

1400

Melilite

90

70

30

1300

Corundum

o

Temperature/ C

Leucite

50

1200

Temperature/ C

Nepheline Olivine

90

Relative mass /%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 34 of 35

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

o

Temperature/ C

(e) Figure 6. Phase assemblage–temperature curves for JZ blended ash. (a) JZ+6%BS; (b) JZ+12%BS; (c) JZ+18%BS; (d) JZ+24%BS; (e) JZ+30%BS.


1500

Page 35 of 35

100

100

Orthopyroxene

90

Slag

70

Ferro-cordierite Magnesium-cordierite

60 50

Anorthite

40

Sanidine

30 20

0 900

1000

1100

Anorthite

50 40 30

Sanidine

20

Albite

10

Corundum

Mullite

Hercynite

Slag

60

Magnesia spinel

Albite

10

Olivine

80

Relative mass /%

Relative mass /%

70

Nepheline

Leucite

90

80

Magnesia spinel

0

1200

1300

1400

900

1500

1000

Hercynite 1100

100

80

Temperature/ C

(a)

(b) 100

Relative mass /%

40

Anorthite

30

Sanidine

20

Magnesia spinel

1000

1100

Feldspar

40

Leucite

30

Magnesia spinel

10

Hercynite

0 1200

1300

1400

900

1500

1000

1100

1200

1300

Temperature/ C

(c)

(d)

(f) 100

1400

o

o

Temperature/ C

Olivine

90 80

Melilite

70

Relative mass /%

900

Slag

50

Hercynite

0

Melilite

60

20

Albite

10

Nepheline

70

Leucite

50

Slag

60

Leucite

50 40 30

Nepheline

20

Magnesia spinel

10

Hercynite

0 900

1500

Olivine

80

Slag

60

1400

Clinopyroxene

90

Olivine

70

1300

Temperature/ C

Melilite Clinopyroxene Nepheline

90

1200 o

o

Relative mass /%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Energy & Fuels

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

o

Temperature/ C

(e) Figure 7. Phase assemblage–temperature curves for ZZ blended ash. (a) ZZ+6%BS; (b) ZZ+12%BS; (c) ZZ+18%BS; (d) ZZ+24%BS; (e) ZZ+30%BS.


1500

Regulation of Ash Fusibility Characteristics for High Ash Fusion

Recommend Documents