Relationships between Chemical Characteristics and Phytotoxicity of

Subscriber access provided by UNIV OF MISSISSIPPI

Article

Relationships between chemical characteristics and phytotoxicity of biochar from poultry litter pyrolysis Alessandro Girolamo Rombolà, Giovanni Marisi, Cristian Torri, Daniele Fabbri, Alessandro Buscaroli, Michele Ghidotti, and Andreas Hornung J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b01540 • Publication Date (Web): 07 Jul 2015 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on July 12, 2015

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 28

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

100

O

90

OH

80

poultry litter

corn stalk

70

60 50 40 30 20

10 0

ACS Paragon Plus Environment


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Relationships between chemical characteristics and phytotoxicity of biochar from poultry litter pyrolysis Alessandro G. Rombolà*§, Giovanni Marisi§, Cristian Torri§, Daniele Fabbri§, Alessandro Buscaroli§, Michele Ghidotti§, Andreas Hornung# §

C.I.R.I. Energia e Ambiente c/o Laboratory of Environmental Sciences “R. Sartori”/C.I.R.S.A., University of Bologna, via S. Alberto 163, 48123 Ravenna, Italy #

Fraunhofer Institute for Environmental, Safety, and Energy Technology UMSICHT, Institute Branch Sulzbach-Rosenberg (Germany)

12 13

ABSTRACT: Three biochars were prepared by intermediate pyrolysis from poultry litter at

14

different temperatures (400, 500 and 600 °C with decreasing residence times) and compared with

15

biochars from corn stalk prepared under the same pyrolysis conditions. The phytotoxicity of these

16

biochars was estimated by means of seed germination tests on cress (Lepidium sativum L.)

17

conducted in water suspensions (at 2, 5 and 40 g/L) and on biochars wetted according to their water

18

holding capacity. While the seeds germinated after 72 hours in water suspensions with corn stalk

19

biochar were similar to the control (water only), significant inhibition was observed with poultry

20

litter biochars. In comparison to corn stalk, poultry litter generated biochars with a higher content of

21

ash, ammonium, nitrogen and volatile fatty acids (VFAs) and a similar concentration of polycyclic

22

aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Results from analytical pyrolysis (Py-GC-MS) indicated that

23

nitrogen-containing organic compounds (NCCs) and aliphatic components were distinctive

24

constituents of the thermally labile fraction of poultry litter biochar. The inhibition of germination

25

due to poultry litter biochar produced at 400 °C (PL400) was suppressed after solvent extraction or

26

treatment with active sludge. A novel method based on solid-phase microextraction (SPME)

27

enabled the identification of mobile organic compounds in PL400 capable to be released in air and

28

water, including VFAs and NCCs. The higher phytotoxicity of poultry litter than corn biochars was

29

tentatively attributed to hydrophilic biodegradable substances derived from lipids or proteins

30

removable by water leaching or microbial treatments.

1 Environment ACS Paragon Plus

Page 2 of 28

Page 3 of 28


31

32

KEYWORDS: biomass, char, ecotoxicity, manure, VOC, pyrolysis.

33 34

35

Biochar is the carbonaceous product of biomass pyrolysis which can be used as soil additive

36

capable to mitigate a variety of agro-environmental stresses through the permanent storage of

37

biomass carbon, pH correction, reduced synthetic fertilizer use, decreased runoff of fertilizers and

38

agrochemicals.1-4

39

However, the effects of biochar are highly variable depending on the feedstock, thermochemical

40

process conditions, application rate, soil characteristics, environmental conditions, and plant species

41

that are invoked to explain the variety of outcomes reported in literature that range from a boost in

42

plant productivity to evident phytotoxicity.5,6

43

Poultry litter is a waste biomass that has been investigated as a substrate for pyrolysis in the

44

preparation of biochar.7-13 Poultry litter can be directly applied in agricultural soil as source of labile

45

N, P and organic C, but drawbacks could be caused by excessive fertilisation and leaching.12 The

46

conversion of these elements into slower cyclic forms by means of carbonisation can have potential

47

benefits such as reduced loss of nutrients,13 improved nutrient availability7,8,11,13 and mitigation of

48

greenhouse gas emission (CO2 and N2O).8 Priming and liming effect due to poultry litter biochar

49

with increased N mineralisation has been described.10 The elimination of potential pathogens is an

50

additional advantage advocating the use of a thermally treated poultry litter.8,12 Moreover, the

51

production of biochar can be integrated with the generation of energy from renewable resources.12

52

However, the use of biochar especially from animal origin has raised concerns related to its possible

53

toxicity and studies have been recently conducted to explore physiological effects on biota.14-16

54

Bioassays based on seed germination and early stage seedling growth are a simple and commonly

55

used ecotoxicological tests for evaluating the impact of biochar amendment on crop growth.17 The

56

biochars phytotoxicity test was made in absence of soil due to the large soil–char interactions

INTRODUCTION



57

observed in some studies18 and because Solaiman et al.17 demonstrated that growing seedlings in

58

pure biochar materials is a valid tool in assessing the effect of biochar application rate on

59

germination.

60

Seed germination, one of the most important phases in the life cycle of a plant, is highly responsive

61

to existing environment.19 Factors such as heavy metals,20 PAHs,21 ammonia,22 salts23 and low

62

molecular weight fatty acids24 have been shown to be responsible for inhibitory effects.

63

Some studies have examined the effect of biochar on seed germination.17,25,26 Rogovska et al.21

64

reported that biochars contain phytotoxic compounds that inhibit germination of maize. In contrast,

65

Free et al.25 reported that maize seed germination was not significantly affected by biochars made

66

from a range of organic sources. Solaiman et al.17 showed that biochars generally increased

67

germination at low application rates (10-50 t/ha), whereas higher application rates of 100 t/ha had

68

no effect or decreased germination rate. Alburquerque et al.27 observed that different biochars

69

exerted a positive effect on seed germination also to high application rates instead.

70

Recent studies have also suggested different methods for reducing the toxicity of biochar.28,29

71

Washing biochar with water or an organic solvent has been successfully tested to reduce

72

phytotoxicity of biochar.21,28,30 Meanwhile, Kołtowski et al.31 demonstrated significant reduction of

73

biochars toxicity by drying them at various temperatures (100–300 °C) for 24 h.

74

While the published and ongoing investigations are providing increasing data helpful to understand

75

the relationships between biochar characteristics and seed germination,28,31 further studies are

76

needed to better clarify the role played by the chemical properties in determining the toxicity effect

77

on plant in order to forecast strategies in biochar synthesis or post-treatments. Biochars from

78

different feedstock and process conditions may exhibit a wide range of plant response, from growth

79

inhibition to stimulation. The relatively simple seed germination test is a valid and fast tool to

80

compare several biochars obtained from different starting materials and under different pyrolysis

81

conditions. Since the test is performed in short time and without the buffering effect of soil, it could


Page 4 of 28

Page 5 of 28


82

be considered a kind of precautionary procedure that highlights intrinsic phytotoxicity of the tested

83

materials.

84

The aim of this study was to evaluate phytotoxicity of biochar from poultry litter by means of

85

standard germination tests and to identify possible relationships with its chemical characteristics. To

86

this purpose, germination tests with cress (Lepidium sativum L.) were conducted to poultry litter

87

biochars synthesised at different pyrolysis conditions. Besides manure, poultry litter typically

88

contains bedding such as sawdust, wood shavings, rice hulls and straw.8,12 Therefore, a comparison

89

was made with biochars produced from a lignocellulosic material, prepared under the same

90

conditions, in order to better discriminate the contributions between lipids/proteins and

91

(hemi)cellulose/lignin. The effect of solvent extraction and biological conditioning on seed

92

germination was tested on a selected poultry litter biochar prepared upon pyrolysis at 400 °C

93

(PL400). The chemical composition of mobile constituents in this sample capable to be potentially

94

released in the water and air compartments was investigated by solvent extraction and solid-phase

95

microextraction (SPME).

96 97

98

Biochar synthesis. Cornstalk was described in a previous study.32 Granular poultry litter was a

99

marketed organic fertilizer obtained after processing raw poultry litter collected from local broiler

100

farms by pasteurizing at 80–110 °C, milling, and pelletizing. Biomass was air dried at 60 °C, milled

101

and sieved at 2 mm before pyrolysis.

102

Batch pyrolysis experiments were conducted under nitrogen flow with a fixed bed tubular quartz

103

reactor placed into a refractory furnace (see Conti et al.33 for details) with about 20 g cornstalk or 35

104

g poultry litter exactly weighed and uniformly placed onto a sliding quartz boat; nitrogen flow was

105

set at 1500 cm3/min and when the temperature inside the reactor, measured with a thermocouple,

106

reached the selected value, the boat was pushed into the oven and left for a given residence time

107

before pulling it back into the unheated part of the reactor. Pyrolysis were performed under three

MATERIALS AND METHODS



108

different conditions based on a previous study33 of temperature/residence time: 400 °C/20 min, 500

109

°C/10 min and 600 °C/5 min. In accordance to the original biomass (cornstalk, CS; poultry litter,

110

PL) and pyrolysis temperature, the obtained biochar samples were named CS400, CS500, CS600,

111

PL400, PL500 and PL600. Chemicals were purchased by Sigma Aldrich. SPME Carboxen-PDMS

112

fibers and the fiber holder were purchased by Supelco.

113

Biochar Characterization. Elemental composition (HCNS) was determined by combustion using a

114

Thermo Scientific Flash 2000 series analyzer. Ash was determined as the residual mass left after

115

exposure at 600 °C for 5 hours. The oxygen content was calculated from the mass balance:

116

O%=100-(C+H+N+ash)%.

117

Analytical pyrolysis (Py-GC-MS) were conducted at 900 °C for 100 seconds with a CDS 5250

118

pyroprobe interfaced to a Varian 3400 GC-Saturn 2000 MS. GC-MS conditions and the

119

determination of indicators of carbonisation % charred and toluene/naphthalene ratio were

120

described in Conti et al.33

121

The content of the 16 EPA priority PAHs was measured in triplicate as described in Fabbri et al.34

122

Briefly, about 0.5 g of biochar were spiked with 0.1 mL of surrogate PAH mix (Supelco for EPA

123

525 containing acenaphthene-d10, phenanthrene-d10 and chrysene-d12 5 µg/mL each in

124

acetonitrile) and soxhlet extracted with acetone/cyclohexane (1:1, v/v) for 36 hours. The solution

125

was filtered, added with 1 mL of n-nonane (keeper), carefully evaporated by rotatory vacuum

126

evaporation at 40 °C and cleaned up by solid phase extraction onto a silica gel cartridge before

127

analysis with a Agilent HP 6850 GC coupled to a Agilent HP 5975 quadrupole mass spectrometer;

128

GC-MS conditions were those detailed in Fabbri et al.34 Recovery of surrogate PAHs was

129

determined with respect to the internal standard tri-tert-butylbenzene added prior to GC-MS

130

analysis.

131

Volatile fatty acids (VFAs) were determined by the single drop extraction procedure as described in

132

Torri et al.35 About 200 mg of biochar exactly weighed was added with 0.1 mL of internal standard

133

solution (1 g/L 2-ethylbutyrate in deionised water) and thoroughly mixed with 0.2 mL of saturated 5 Environment ACS Paragon Plus

Page 6 of 28

Page 7 of 28


134

aqueous KHSO4. After centrifugation, a drop of dimethyl carbonate (1.2 µL) from a 10 µL

135

chromatography microsyringe was exposed into the supernatant aqueous solution. After 20 min

136

exposure the drop was retracted and injected into a GC-FID (injection temperature 250 °C)

137

equipped with polar GC column (Agilent Q7221J&W nitroterephthalic-acid-modified polyethylene

138

glycol DB-FFAP 222 30 m, 0.25 mm, 0.2 µm) with the following thermal program: 80 °C for 5

139

min, then 10 °C/min to 250 °C. Calibration was performed by applying the same procedure to

140

standard solutions containing known concentration of each VFA (namely: acetic, propionic,

141

isobutyric, butyric, isovaleric and valeric acids).

142

For the determination of N-NH4+, about 10 g of biochar were placed in an end-to-end shaker for 2 h

143

with 1 N KCl (1:10 dw:v) followed by centrifuging at 4500 x g for 20 minutes and passing through

144

a 0.45 µm paper filter.

145

SPME of mobile compounds. An aliquot (1mL) of the aqueous extract solution was introduced

146

into a vial mixed with 0.5 mL of KH2PO4/Na2HPO4 phosphate buffer 2M at pH 5.3, then spiked

147

with o-eugenol 1µg/mL and 2-ethyl butyric acid 5 µg/mL as internal standards. SPME analyses

148

were performed by directly exposing the Carboxen-PDMS fiber into the test solution under

149

magnetic stirring. After 30 minutes exposure, the fiber was inserted into the injector of an Agilent

150

5977 gas chromatograph and analytes were thermally desorbed at 250 °C for 10 minutes and

151

analysed as described for VFAs with a DB-FFAP polar column (30 m lenght, 0.25 mm i.d, 0.25 µm

152

film thickness). Detection was made with a quadrupole mass spectrometer Agilent 7820A operating

153

under electron ionization at 70eV with acquisition at 1scan/sec in the m/z 35 and 450 range. Mass

154

spectra were acquired in full scan mode with a gain factor of 5. Prior to sample analysis, blanks

155

were performed first with a thermal desorption of the fiber alone and then after a 30 min exposure

156

to a solution of deionized water with 0.67 M phosphate buffer.

157

Head space (HS) analysis was performed following the procedure described by Spokas et al.36 (150

158

°C, 30 minutes) but using SPME instead of syringe sampling. Poultry litter biochar was weighed

159

(0.5 g) into 20 mL head space vials. The vials were spiked with 1µg of o-eugenol (1000 µg/mL 6 Environment ACS Paragon Plus


160

solution in methanol) and then sealed. HS-SPME was carried out by placing the fiber holder at the

161

top of the vial and exposing the Car-PDMS fiber to the headspace close to the cap (30 minutes),

162

while bottom of the vial was put on a heating plate at 150 °C. GC-MS analysis was carried out as

163

described above but with the GC oven starting from 36 °C held for 5 minutes. Prior sample

164

analysis, blanks were carried out first with a thermal desorption of the fiber alone and a sealed vial

165

with empty headspace.

166

Biochar post-treatments. Aqueous extraction. About 2 g of PL400 was extracted with 50 mL of

167

deionised water in a 100 mL flask at room temperature for 12 hours with mechanical shaking. The

168

aqueous phase was separated by filtration through a 0.22 µm paper filter and used as such for the

169

germination test, while an aliquot was kept at -20 °C for SPME-GC-MS analysis (see above). The

170

solid biochar residue left after water extraction was further extracted with 50 mL of methanol under

171

reflux for 12 hours. The methanol was separated by filtration and an aliquot corresponding to the 40

172

g/L suspension of biochar was poured into petri dishes and dried overnight at 70 °C under vacuum

173

to remove all the methanol. Thereafter deionised water was added to perform germination tests. The

174

final solid biochar residue left after water and methanol extraction was dried overnight at 100 °C

175

under vacuum and utilized for germination tests.

176

Biochar post-treatments. Biological treatment. Microbial treatment of PL400 was conducted

177

with an activated sludge obtained from a municipal wastewater treatment plant located in Ravenna

178

after centrifugation at 6000 rpm (20% w/w volatile suspended solids). A suspension containing 0.5

179

g of the concentrated sludge and 250 mL of 40 g L-1 PL400 in deionised water was thoroughly

180

mixed under laminar shake at 120 rpm overnight. An aliquot of 10 mL of this suspension was added

181

in petri dishes and stored for 14 days at 25 °C before performing germination test as shown above.

182

Germination tests. The germination tests were conducted in four replicates by incubating 50 seeds

183

of cress (Lepidium sativum L.) with 5 g of a mixture containing biochar and deionized water onto

184

sterilized cellulose filter paper (Whatman No. 1) placed in a petri dish sealed with paraffin film.

185

Three levels of biochar concentration were tested 2, 5 and 40 g/L. These rates were equivalent to 2, 7 Environment ACS Paragon Plus

Page 8 of 28

Page 9 of 28


186

5 and 40 t/ha on an area basis of 10 cm soil depth and a dry bulk density of 1.5 kg/m3. Germination

187

tests were also performed on the fractions obtained from the chemical and biological post-

188

treatments of PL400 described above. The quantity of these fractions was adjusted to correspond to

189

the concentration level of 40 g/L of the original biochar. Before incubation, the samples were

190

shaken at 150 rpm on a platform shaker at room temperature for 24 h. pH and electrical

191

conductivity (EC) were both determined. The pH was directly measured placing the glass-electrode

192

into the suspension with a pH-meter Mettler Toledo SG 2-ELK. The EC was measured with a Delta

193

OHM HD 8706 conductimeter in the supernatant obtained by centrifuging the suspension and

194

filtered at 0.45 micron.

195

Phytotoxicity tests were performed on biochar:deionized water mixtures (wetted biochar) according

196

to the procedure described in UNI 11357:2010. The experiments were conducted with 50 seeds of

197

cress which were incubated with 10 g of biochar saturated with deionized water according to value

198

of the water holding capacity (Table 1) on sterilized cellulose filter paper placed in a petri dish. All

199

Petri dishes were covered and incubated in room thermostat at 25 ± 2 °C for 72 ± 0.5 hours in the

200

dark. Similarly, a control was prepared with deionised water.

201

After 72 hours of exposure, a visible root development was used as the operational definition of

202

seed germination. Data were reported as relative seed germination (RSG) percentage with respect to

203

the control (deionised water):

204

RSG = (number of germinated seeds in the sample/ number of germinated seeds in control) * 100.

205

Statistical analysis. All the experiments were conducted at least in duplicate. Results of

206

germination tests were evaluated statistically using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) performed with

207

R software version 3.1.2 (http://www.r-project.org) followed by Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc

208

tests. The difference between the treated groups and the control group was evaluated with Dunnett’s

209

t-test (p < 0.05).

210 211

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 8 Environment ACS Paragon Plus


212

Characterization of biochar

213

Bulk analysis. The yields and characteristics of biochars obtained from the pyrolysis of poultry litter

214

(PL400, PL500, PL600) under three different pyrolysis conditions are reported in Table 1 and

215

compared with those of biochar from corn stalk (CS400, CS500, CS600). As expected, the chemical

216

characteristics of the biochars were dependent on the original biomass and the pyrolysis conditions.

217

In particular, the H/C and O/C ratios decreased with increasing pyrolysis temperature, while the

218

content of ash increased as observed with the same pyrolysis unit under the same conditions.33

219

Biochar from poultry litter contained higher levels of nitrogen, sulphur and ash, derived from the

220

manure fraction, as demonstrated by comparative studies on manure and lignocellulosic biochars.9

221

In general, the elemental composition, ash content and the trends with pyrolysis conditions of the

222

investigated poultry litter chars were comparable to those reported in the literature.7,8,37

223 224

Extractable compounds. The concentrations of specific potentially toxic extractable compounds,

225

namely PAHs, VFAs and ammonium are reported in Table 2. Solvent extractable PAHs occurred

226

within the range of 0.7-1.7 mg/kg, values that were typical of biochars from different origins.34,38,39

227

PAHs concentration can be considered negligible for acute effect lower than typical values in

228

soils.40 Generally, naphthalene was the most abundant PAH followed by phenanthrene and fluorine;

229

the level of benzo[a]pyrene was in the 5-65 ng/g range.

230

The concentration of VFAs was significantly higher in poultry litter biochars (4-9 mg/kg) in

231

comparison to those from cornstalk (2-4 mg/kg). Acetic acid was always the most abundant VFA

232

and could be derived from the thermal degradation of hemicellulose.41 VFAs could also be derived

233

from the thermal degradation of triacylglycerols42 and free fatty acids.43

234

Ammonium was not detected in cornstalk biochar, whereas it was abundant in biochars from

235

poultry litter with higher concentrations in the less carbonised biochars.

236


Page 10 of 28

Page 11 of 28


237

Py-GC-MS. Thermolabile fraction. The molecular composition of the thermally labile fraction

238

could be inferred from the structural identification of the compounds identified in the

239

pyrolysates.33,34,44 The pyrolysate of CS400 was characterised by a complex pattern of compounds

240

dominated by phenols and methoxyphenols associated to the presence of partially charred lignin,

241

while the pyrolysate of CS600 contained few peaks due to the hydrocarbons associated to more

242

heavily charred fraction (Figure 1). Proxies of the degree of carbonisation established in previous

243

studies33 for lignocellulosic biomass were confirmed in this study for corn stalk biochar: the

244

toluene/naphthalene ratio and the relative abundance of compounds representative of the charred

245

fraction (% charred) exhibited a clear trend with H/C ratios (Table 2). However, biochar samples

246

from poultry litter did not exhibit significant changes with the H/C ratios and the variability was

247

higher. This finding would suggest that the pyrolysis proxies developed for lignocellulosic biochar

248

could not be valid for biochar containing charred proteins and lipids.

249

The occurrence of partially charred components from proteins and lipids were clearly evidenced in

250

the pyrolysates of biochar. Phenols and methoxyphenols were detected in PL400 as well as in

251

CS400 in accordance to the fact that the original substrates contained a lignocellulosic component.

252

The distinctive signature of PL pyrolysate was the occurrence of nitrogen-containing compounds

253

(NCCs) from proteins and a pattern of n-alkanes/n-alk-1-enes assigned to the thermal cracking of

254

bound or free fatty acids (Figure 1). The occurrence of saturated alkyl domains was confirmed by

255

13

256

in the availability of sorbed compounds.37 Among the tentatively identified NCCs, pyrrole,

257

pyridine, (iso)quinoline and carbazole along with their alkyl derivatives are indicative of partially

258

charred proteinaceous matter. It is worthwhile to note that NCCs were also identified in the volatile

259

fraction by SPME as described in the next section.

C-NMR studies on poultry manure biochars that disappear after carbonisation and may play a role

260 261

SPME-GC-MS. Volatile and water soluble compounds. Information on the molecular characteristics

262

of the mobile fraction was gathered by HS-SPME (volatile) and DI-SPME (water soluble). Poultry 10 Environment ACS Paragon Plus


263

litter contains heavy metals that may end up in the resulting biochar.45 However, our attention was

264

specifically focused to organic compounds, being reported that heavy metals are generally present

265

below the limits causing adverse effects and loosely bioavailable.46 Moreover, Bastos et al.16 argued

266

that in aqueous extracts PAHs and metals might occur at concentrations below the level to pose

267

detrimental effects, at least for woody biochar up to 80 t/ha; however, it has to be remarked that the

268

biological response depends on the organisms selected in the bioassay,16 and the content of metals

269

depends on pyrolysis conditions,45 thus the influence of inorganic constituents cannot be always

270

excluded.

271

SPME was applied to sample PL400 that was utilised in post-treatment studies. The results are

272

shown in Figure 2 for the analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by HS-SPME (Figure

273

2A) and DI-SPME of aqueous extracts (Figure 2B), respectively. The VOCs were characterised by

274

the presence of a wide array of compounds deriving from the thermal degradation of

275

polysaccharides (e.g. cyclopentenones, furans), lignin (e.g. 4-vinylphenol, guaiacol), proteins (e.g.

276

pyrroles, pyridines, indole), lipids (e.g. VFAs, acetic acid is also derived from hemicellulose).

277

Alkylated pyrazines and acetamide were probably derived from Maillard reactions between

278

carbohydrates and proteins.

279

Notably, a suite of short chain n-alkanes/alkenes were identified supporting Py-GC-MS results and

280

literature data about the occurrence of aliphatic components in poultry litter biochar.37 It is expected

281

that the polar fraction of VOCs will be preferentially distributed into the aqueous phase in

282

comparison to non-polar constituents. In fact, the SPME-GC-MS analysis of the PL400 water

283

extract showed a predominance of organic acids, including C2-C10 aliphatic and C7-C9 aromatic

284

acids (Figure 2B).

285

Effect of biochar on seed germination. The pH and EC of the biochar/water suspensions utilized

286

in germination tests are reported in Table 3. The pH values were higher for the suspensions, from

287

the same feedstock, with the more carbonized biochars and increased, for each biochar type, with


Page 12 of 28

Page 13 of 28


288

increasing concentration. Under the same conditions, the pH was higher in the suspensions with

289

poultry litter biochar, in accordance to previous studies.9

290

The EC values of the suspensions increased with increasing biochar concentration and, at the same

291

concentrations, the biochar from poultry litter had much higher (from 4 to 40 times for the same

292

condition) EC values than the CS suspensions. Salinity can have a detrimental effect on seed

293

germination and plant growth, especially in the seedling stage, though the response of various plant

294

species to salinity differs considerably.47 In general, salinity effects are mostly negligible in extracts

295

with EC readings of 2000 µS/cm or less.48 This critical level was exceeded in poultry litter biochar

296

at 40 g/L. The toxicity of inorganic nitrogen results mainly from ammonia (NH3) which affects

297

plant growth and metabolism at low concentration levels at which NH4+ is not harmful.47 At

298

concentrations of 0.15-0.20 mM, which are comparable to those calculated in the 40 g/L

299

biochar/water mixtures, NH3 could be toxic.49

300

The effect of the biochar suspensions on seed germination of cress (Lepidium sativum L.) is

301

presented in Table 4 in terms of relative seed germination percentage with respect to control

302

(deionised water only).

303

The assay results in this work suggested that all the cornstalk biochar suspensions had little impact

304

on seed germination as one-way ANOVA analysis showed no significant difference between

305

control group and test groups (p > 0.05). Noticeably, CS400 was almost non-toxic to germination

306

even if used as the growth substrate (UNI test, Table 3).

307

On the contrary, all the biochar samples from poultry litter inhibited significantly the seed

308

germination at the highest level of 40 g/L in water suspensions. At the harsh conditions of the UNI

309

test the germination was totally suppressed.

310

The comparison with cornstalk suggested that the toxicity of biochar from poultry litter could be

311

explained by some distinctive chemical components originated from this feedstock. Compounds

312

derived from lignin and cellulose/hemicellulose could be excluded on the ground that biochar

313

samples from corn stalk did not suppress seed germination in water suspensions. The biochars 12 Environment ACS Paragon Plus


314

suspensions from both substrates presented similar pH values, thus this parameter is not involved in

315

toxicity. This is in accordance to Gell et al.50 findings who did not evidenced clear trends of pH and

316

short term phytotoxicity in biochars of different origins, at least under neutral/basic conditions.

317

Similarly, the solvent extractable PAHs concentration was similar in PL and CS biochars, thus

318

PAHs cannot be responsible of the observed toxicity. The calculated concentrations of VFAs in

319

biochar suspensions (from data of Table 2) are at levels that may cause detrimental effects, for

320

instance calculated PL400 VFAs at 40 g/L (374 µg/g) was higher than 252 µg/g EC50 values for

321

plant growth.46 However, different factors are governing the physiological response of VFAs

322

including pH and bio-availability.51,52Acetic acid was present in all the biochars, partly due to the

323

decomposition of cellulose/hemicellulose. In addition, the occurrence of benzoic acid and other

324

aromatic acids was identified by DI-SPME along with VFAs. Benzoic acid is reported to inhibit

325

hydraulic conductivity and nutrient uptake by plant roots, thus resulting in growth inhibition.53

326

However, no significant effect of benzoic acid on Orobanche crenata seed germination was

327

observed by Fernández-Aparicio et al.54

328

The suite of alkanes/alkenes characterising the Py-GC-MS pyrolysates of poultry litter biochar

329

samples would suggest the presence of a lipid fraction producing shorter chain fatty acids by

330

thermal degradation as confirmed by SPME-GC-MS on PL400.

331

The main differences between the CS and PL biochars were the higher content of elemental

332

nitrogen (Table 1) and ammonium (Table 2), and the presence of a thermally labile fraction derived

333

from proteins and lipids (Py-GC-MS data).

334

Germination tests after biochar post-treatment. A selected sample of poultry litter biochar

335

(PL400) was extracted with water followed by methanol extraction; the extracts and the residue

336

were utilized in germination tests. Germination tests were also performed to PL400 after treatment

337

with sewage sludge to assess the effect of biodegradation. The quantity of extracts and the residues

338

corresponded to the biochar loading level of 40 g/L. The results are presented in Figure 3. The cress

339

germination rate in the water extracts was similar to that of the original biochar suspensions 13 Environment ACS Paragon Plus

Page 14 of 28

Page 15 of 28


340

indicating inhibition due to some components in the water extracts. The germination rates increased

341

significantly to values similar to the control when the suspension was made with the biochar left

342

after solvent extraction. These observations are supported by the results of Rogovska et al.21, who

343

showed that growth inhibition no longer occurred when biochars were washed prior to germination.

344

Biochar suspensions treated with an active sludge for almost two weeks displayed a germination

345

rate similar to the extracted biochar (Figure 3). The reduced toxicity could be ascribed to microbial

346

degradation of some noxious components as suggested by Bargmann et al.28

347

The results showed in Figure 3 indicated that the relative seed germination of water extracts is low

348

and comparable to that of the original biochar strongly supporting the hypothesis that the polar/ionic

349

constituents ending up in water are responsible to the observed biochar toxicity. Similarly,

350

Bargmann et al.28 applying germination tests to hydrochars from various origin demonstrated that

351

the inhibiting effects were caused by some water soluble substances. These authors hypothesized

352

that organic acids could be possibly responsible of the water extractable fractions toxicity. The

353

potential of microbial detoxification was evidenced by Busch et al.26 who observed that the

354

genotoxicity of hydrochar mixed with compost became lower than that of pure hydrochar.

355

Gell et al.50 showed that the short term phytotoxicity of biochar is dependent on the feedstock and is

356

probably associated to ionic water soluble constituents rather than the less polar organic compounds

357

composing tars. In accordance, the methanolic extract of biochar after water extraction exhibited a

358

seed germination rate of 93% (not reported in Figure 3) higher than that measured in the water

359

extracts. Interestingly, among the various biochars investigated by Gell et al.50 those obtained from

360

poultry biochar exhibited positive effects (radish root elongation) and acted in decreasing

361

phytotoxicity of digestates.

362

The results of this study suggested that toxic compounds responsible for the toxicity of PL400 were

363

water extractable and biodegradable. The SPME analysis of the water extracts (Figure 2) evidenced

364

that aliphatic and aromatic carboxylic acids were the dominant compounds. Py-GC-MS and HS-



365

SPME analyses evidenced the presence of NNCs that seemingly were not partitioned into the water

366

phase.

367

Biochar has a potential as a soil amendment for improving soil quality, decrease fertilizers losses

368

and store carbon into the soil. Nevertheless, as soil additive, the absence of phytotoxicity is the

369

minimal requirement. Biochar from poultry litter may exert negative effect at least at the relatively

370

high level of soil amendment (40 t/ha) due to the presence of water soluble and biodegradable

371

components, probably derived from the thermal decomposition of proteins and lipids. However, the

372

toxicity can be drastically reduced by means of washing with water or mixing with biologically

373

active material. Whereas leaching (accompanied by wastewater generation) would be not an

374

applicable option, biological treatment (e.g. composting or mixing with activated sludge) of

375

phytotoxic biochars could be a simple and economic solution for increase the agronomic

376

performance of biochar characterized by toxicity issues. Results obtained shows that biochar are not

377

an “intrinsically safe” material, and every biochar (from different process and/or feedstock) has to

378

be evaluated, checked and eventually treated before the agronomic application.

379 380

381

Corresponding Author

382

*Alessandro G. Rombolà. Fax: +39 0544 937411. E-mail: [email protected]

383

Notes

384

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

AUTHOR INFORMATION

385 386

387

This study was partly conducted within the framework of the APQ Ricerca Intervento a “Sostegno

388

dello sviluppo dei Laboratori di ricerca nei campi della nautica e dell’energia per il Tecnopolo di

389

Ravenna” “Energia, parte Biomasse” between Università di Bologna and Regione Emilia Romagna

390

(Italy). The authors acknowledge Denis Zannoni University of Bologna for ammonium analysis.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS


Page 16 of 28

Page 17 of 28


391

Part of this study was based on the master thesis by Giovanni Marisi at the University of Bologna

392

Ravenna Campus. The SPME study was conducted in the framework of the Fraunhofer UMSICHT

393

- University of Bologna Collaboration Agreement.

394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403

REFERENCES (1) Glaser, B.; Lehmann, J.; Zech, W. Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly

weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal e a review. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2002, 35, 219–230. (2) Lehmann, J.; Gaunt, J.; Rondon, M. Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems - a review. Mitigation Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 2006, 11, 403–427. (3) Sohi, S.P.; Krull, E.; Lopez-Capel, E.; Bol, R. A review of biochar and its use and Function in Soil. Adv. Agron. 2010, 105, 47–82. (4) Manyà, J.J. Pyrolysis for biochar purposes: a review to establish current knowledge gaps and research needs. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 7939–7954.

404

(5) Jeffery, S.; Verheijen, F.G.A.; van der Velde, M.; Bastos, A.C. A quantitative review of the

405

effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agric., Ecosyst.

406

Environ. 2011, 144, 175–187.

407

(6) Mukherjee, A.; Lal, R.; Zimmerman, A.R. Effects of biochar and other amendments on the

408

physical properties and greenhouse gas emissions of an artificially degraded soil. Sci. Total

409

Environ. 2014, 487, 26–36

410 411

(7) Chan, K.Y.; Van Zwieten, L.; Meszaros, I.; Downie , A.; Joseph, S. Using poultry litter biochars as soil amendments. Aust. J. Soil Res. 2008, 46, 437–444

412

(8) Van Zwieten, L.; Kimber, S.W.L.; Morris, S.G.; Singh, B.P.; Grace, P.R.; Scheer, C.;.

413

Downie, A.E; Cowie, A.L.; Rust, J. Pyrolysing poultry litter reduces N2O and CO2 ﬂuxes. Sci. Total

414

Environ. 2013, 465, 279–287.



415

(9) Novak, J. M.; Cantrell, K.B.; Watts, D.W.; Busscher, W.J.; Johnson, M.G. Designing

416

relevant biochars as soil amendments using lignocellulosic-based and manure-based feedstocks. J.

417

Soils Sediments 2014, 14, 330–343.

418

(10) Ameloot, N.; Sleutel, S.; Das, K.C.; Kanagaratnam, J.; De Neve, S. Biochar amendment to

419

soils with contrasting organic matter level: effects on N mineralization and biological soil

420

properties. GCB Bioenergy 2015, 7, 135–144.

421

(11) Hosseini Bai, S.; Xu, C.-Y.; Xu, Z.; Blumfield, T.J.; Zhao, H.; Wallace, H.; Reverchon, F.;

422

Van Zwieten, L. Soil and foliar nutrient and nitrogen isotope composition (δ15N) at 5 years after

423

poultry litter and green waste biochar amendment in a macadamia orchard. Environ. Sci. Pollut.

424

Res. 2015, 22, 3803– 3809.

425

(12) Huang, Y.; Anderson, M.; McIlveen-Wright, D.; Lyons, G.A.; McRoberts, W.C.; Wang,

426

Y.D.; Roskilly, A.P.; Hewitt, N.J. Biochar and renewable energy generation from poultry litter

427

waste: A technical and economic analysis based on computational simulations. Appl. Energy 2015,

428

In press, DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.029.

429 430

(13) Wang, Y.; Lin, Y; Chiu, P.C.; Imhoff, P.T.; Guo, M. Phosphorus release behaviors of poultry litter biochar as a soil amendment. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 512–513, 454–463.

431

(14) Oleszczuk, P.; Hale, S.E.; Lehmann, J.; Cornelissen, G. Activated carbon and biochar

432

amendments decrease pore-water concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in

433

sewage sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 111, 84–91.

434

(15) Smith, C.R.; Sleighter, R.L.; Hatcher, P.G.; Lee, J.W. Molecular Characterization of

435

Inhibiting Biochar Water Extractable Substances Using Electrospray Ionization Fourier Transform

436

Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 13294–13302.

437

(16) Bastos, A.C.; Keizer, J.J.; Prodana, M.; Abrantes, N.; Soares, A.M.V.M.; Loureiro, S.

438

Potential risk of biochar-amended soil to aquatic systems: an evaluation based on aquatic bioassays.

439

Ecotoxicology 2014, 23, 1784–1793.

440 441

(17) Solaiman, Z.M.; Murphy, D.V.; Abbott, L.K. Biochars influence seed germination and early growth of seedlings. Plant Soil 2012, 353, 273–287.


Page 18 of 28

Page 19 of 28


442

(18) Zimmerman, A.R.; Gao, B.; Ahn, M.Y. Positive and negative carbon mineralization

443

priming effects among a variety of biochar-amended soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2011, 43, 1169–

444

1179.

445

(19) Kuriakose, S.V.; Prasad, M.N.V. Cadmium stress affects seed germination and seedling

446

growth in Sorghum bicolor L. Moench by changing the activities of hydrolyzing enzymes. Plant

447

Growth Regul. 2008, 54, 143–156.

448 449 450 451

(20) Wollan, E.; Davis, R.D.; Jenner, S. Effects of sewage sludge on seed germination. Environ. Pollut. 1978, 17, 195–205. (21) Rogovska, N.; Laird, D.; Cruse, R.M.; Trabue, S.; Heaton, E. Germination tests for assessing biochar quality. J. Environ. Qual. 2012, 41, 1014–1022.

452

(22) Wong, M.H.; Cheung, Y.H.; Cheung, C.L. The effects of ammonia and ethylene oxide in

453

animal manure and sewage sludge on the seed germination and root elongation of Brassica

454

parachinensis. Environ. Pollut., Ser. A 1983, 30, 109–123.

455 456

(23) Adriano, D.C.; Chang, A.C.; Pratt, P.F.; Sharpless, R. Effect of soil application of dairy manure on germination and emergence of some selected crops. J. Environ. Qual. 1973, 2, 396–399.

457

(24) Zucconi, F.; Monaco, A.; Forte, M.; De Bertoldi, M. Phytotoxins during the stabilization of

458

organic matter. In Composting of Agricultural and Other Wastes; Gasser, J.K.R., Eds.; Publisher:

459

Elsevier, London, UK, 1985, pp. 73–86.

460 461

(25) Free, H.F.; McGill C.R.; Rowarth J.S.; Hedley M.J. The effect of biochars on maize (Zea mays) germination. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 2010, 53, 1–4.

462

(26) Busch, D.; Stark, A.; Kammann, C.I.; Glaser, B. Genotoxic and phytotoxic risk assessment

463

of fresh and treated hydrochar from hydrothermal carbonization compared to biochar from

464

pyrolysis. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2013, 97, 59–66.

465

(27) Alburquerque, J.A.; Calero, J.M.; Barrón, V.; Torrent, J.; del Campillo, M.C.; Gallardo, A.;

466

Villar, R. Effects of biochars produced from different feedstocks on soil properties and sunflower

467

growth. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2014, 177, 16–25. 18 Environment ACS Paragon Plus


468 469

(28) Bargmann, I.; Rillig, M.C.; Buss, W.; Kruse, A.; Kuecke, M. Hydrochar and biochar effects on germination of spring barley. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2013, 199, 360–373.

470

(29) Buss, W.; Masek, O. Mobile organic compounds in biochar – A potential source of

471

contamination – Phytotoxic effects on cress seed (Lepidium sativum) germination. J. Environ.

472

Manage. 2014, 137, 111–119.

473

(30) Bernardo, M.; Lapa, N.; Gonçalves, M.; Barbosa, R.; Mendes, B.; Pinto, F.; Gulyurtlu, I.

474

Toxicity of char residues produced in the co-pyrolysis of different wastes. Waste Manage. 2010, 30,

475

628–635.

476 477

(31) Kołtowski, M.; Oleszczuk, P. Toxicity of biochars after polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons removal by thermal treatment. Ecol. Eng. 2015, 75, 79–85.

478

(32) Cordella, M.; Torri, C.; Adamiano, A.; Fabbri, D.; Barontini, F.; Cozzani, V. Bio-oils from

479

biomass slow pyrolysis: a chemical and toxicological screening. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 231–232,

480

26–35.

481

(33) Conti, R.; Rombolà, A.G.; Modelli, A.; Torri, C.; Fabbri, D. Evaluation of the thermal and

482

environmental stability of switchgrass biochars by Py-GC-MS. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2014, 110,

483

239–247.

484 485 486 487 488 489

(34) Fabbri, D.; Rombolà, A.G.; Torri, C.; Spokas, K.A. Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biochar and biochar amended soil. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2013, 103, 60–67. (35) Torri, C.; Fabbri, D. Biochar enables anaerobic digestion of aqueous phase from intermediate pyrolysis of biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 172, 335–341 (36) Spokas, K., Novak., J., Stewart, C., Cantrell., K., Uchimiya, M., DuSaire, M., Ro, K., Qualitative analysis of volatile organic compounds on biochar. Chemosphere 2011, 85, 869–882.

490

(37) Cimo’, G.; Kucerik, J.; Berns, A.E.; Schaumann, G.E.; Alonzo, G.; Conte; P. Eﬀect of

491

Heating Time and Temperature on the Chemical Characteristics of Biochar from Poultry Manure. J.

492

Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 1912–1918.


Page 20 of 28

Page 21 of 28


493

(38) Hale, S.E.; Lehmann, J.; Rutherford, D.; Zimmerman, A.R.; Bachmann, R.T.;

494

Shitumbanuma, V.; O’Toole, A.; Sundqvist, K.L.; Arp, H.P.H.; Cornelissen, G. Quantifying the

495

total and bioavailable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and dioxins in biochars. Environ. Sci.

496

Technol. 2012, 46, 2830–2838.

497

(39) Hilber, I.; Blum, F.; Leifeld, J.; Schmidt, H.P.; Bucheli, T.D. 2012. Quantitative

498

determination of PAHs in biochar: a prerequisite to ensure its quality and safe application. J. Agric.

499

Food Chem. 2012, 60, 3042–3050.

500 501

(40) Bucheli, T.D.; Blum, F.; Desaules, A.; Gustafsson, O. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, black carbon, and molecular markers in soils of Switzerland. Chemosphere 2004, 56, 1061–1076.

502

(41) Mante, O.D.; Babu, S. P.; Amidon, T. E. A comprehensive study on relating cell-wall

503

components of lignocellulosic biomass to oxygenated species formed during pyrolysis. J. Anal.

504

Appl. Pyrolysis 2014, 108, 56–67.

505

(42) Higman, E.B.; Schmeltz, I.; Higman, H.C.; Chortyk, O.T. Studies on thermal degradation

506

of naturally occurring materials. II. Products from pyrolysis of triglycerides at 400 degrees. J.

507

Agric. Food Chem. 1973, 21 (2), 202–204.

508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517

(43) Asomaning, J.; Mussone, P.; Bressler, D.C. Thermal deoxygenation and pyrolysis of oleic acid. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2014, 105, 1–7. (44) Kaal, J.; Rumpel, C. Can pyrolysis-GC/MS be used to estimate the degree of thermal alteration of black carbon? Org. Geochem. 2009, 40, 1179–1187. (45) Song, W.P.; Guo, M.X. Quality variations of poultry litter biochar generated at different pyrolysis temperatures. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2012, 94, 138–145. (46) Cely, P.; Gascó, G.; Paz-Ferreiro, J.; Méndez, A. Agronomic properties of biochars from different manure wastes. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2015, 111, 173–182. (47) Mengel, K.; Kirkby, E.A. Principles of Plant Nutrition, 4th Edition. International Potash Institute, Bern, 1987, 745.



518

(48) Hoekstra, N.J.; Bosker, T.; Lantinga, E.A. Effects of cattle dung from farms with different

519

feeding strategies on germination and initial root growth of cress (Lepidium sativum L.). Agric.,

520

Ecosyst. Environ. 2002, 93, 189–196.

521 522 523 524 525 526

(49) Bennet, A.C.; Adams, F. Concentration of NH3(aq) required for incipient NH3 toxicity to seedlings. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 1970, 34, 259–263. (50) Gell, K.; van Groenigen, J.W.; Cayuela, M.L. Residues of bioenergy production chains as soil amendments: Immediate and temporal phytotoxicity. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 186, 2017–2025. (51) Himanen, M.; Prochazka, P.; Hänninen, K.; Oikari, A. Phytotoxicity of low-weight carboxylic acids. Chemosphere 2012, 88, 426–431.

527

(52) Paavola, T.; Rintala, J. Effects of storage on characteristics and hygienic quality of

528

digestates from four co-digestion concepts of manure and biowaste. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99,

529

7041–7051.

530

(53) Blum, U. The value of model plant–microbe–soil systems for understanding processes

531

associated with allelopathic interactions: one example. In Allelopathy: Organisms, Processes, and

532

Applications; Inderjit, K.M.M., Dakshini, F.A., Eds.; Publisher: American Chemical Society,

533

Washington, DC, 1995, pp. 127–131.

534

(54) Fernández-Aparicio, M.; Cimmino, A.; Evidente, A.; Rubiales, D. Inhibition of Orobanche

535

crenata seed germination and radicle growth by allelochemicals identified in cereals. J. Agric. Food

536

Chem. 2013, 61, 9797−9803.

537 538 539


Page 22 of 28

Page 23 of 28


TABLES AND FIGURE

Table 1. Yields, water-holding capacity, elemental analysis and ash (% wt dry weight mean values ± s.d. n=4) and elemental molar ratios of biochars from the pyrolysis of corn stalk (CS) and poultry litter (PL) at different conditions (400 °C/20 min, 500 °C/10 min and 600 °C/5 min).

Yield (% wt)

waterholding capacity (%)

CS400

38.3±0.9

CS500

Biochar

Elemental content (%)

Ash (%)

Molar ratios H/C

C

H

N

O

S

69.5

50±2.1

3.3±0.1

0.96±0.03

15±1.9

0.07±0.01

28.95±0.01

0.79

33±1.6

81.1

51±1.6

2.7±0.1

0.91±0.04

14.9±0.1

0.03±0.04

30.14±0.02

0.63

CS600

31.4±0.5

73.7

50.7±0.3

2.4±0.1

0.81±0.03

13±1.6

-

32.30±0.02

0.57

PL400

49±3.4

88.6

33±4.7

2.7±0.5

3.6±0.8

11±2.1

1.7±0.5

46.64±0.01

0.98

PL500

41.4±0.9

94.1

33±1.0

2.1±0.1

3.4±0.1

6.5±0.9

2.2±0.1

52.29±0.04

0.76

PL600

39.5±0.5

92.3

31.4±0.5

1.7±0.1

3.2±0.5

4.6±0.3

2.3±0.1

56.82±0.01

0.65



Page 24 of 28

Table 2. Molecular analysis of extractable compounds and volatile matter by Py-GC-MS of biochar from corn stalk (CS) and poultry litter (PS) (mean values and s.d. from two replicates, T/N toluene/naphthalene ratio). Extractable Biochar

PAHs

VFAs

Py-GC-MS NH4+

mg/kg mg/g mg/kg CS400 0.72±0.06 3.8±1.2

% charred 53±3

T/N 8.5±0.7

CS500 1.09±0.05 0.9±0.3

-

80±3

5.4±1.5

CS600 0.84±0.01 2.6±0.1

-

92±3

3.0±1.7

1.7±0.2

9.3±0.3

45

88±9

13±10

PL500 0.88±0.05 4.3±2.0

25

90±3

12±6

PL600 0.79±0.01 6.8±1.8

14

88±3

11±2

PL400

Table 3. Results from chemical analysis of biochars and relative water suspensions.

Biochar

Electrical conductivity (mS/cm)

pH 2 g/L 5 g/L 40 g/L

2 g/L

5 g/L 40 g/L

CS400

7.6

8.0

8.5

16

75

1.8 103

CS500

8.2

8.5

9.3

72

76

1.9 103

CS600

8.4

8.9

10.1

1.9 102 3.5 102 1.9 103

PL400

8.0

9.0

9.7

7.1 102 1.3 103 7.3 103

PL500

8.4

9.3

10.2

8.7 102 1.5 103 7.7 103

PL600

9.4

9.8

10.3

9.3 102 2.0 103 8.1 103


Page 25 of 28


Table 4. Relative seed germination (% of control) of cress (Lepidium sativum L.) in biochar:deionized water suspensions (2, 5, 40 g/L) and phytotoxicity tests (% seed germination with respect to control) according to UNI 11357:2010 (mean values and s.d. from four replicates). The percent seed germination in pure deionised water (control) is also reported. *Indicates differences at the 0.05 level compared with the control by Dunnett’s tests. Germination (%)

Biochar Id. Control

2 g/L 96±2

5 g/L 97±2

40 g/L 98±2

UNI 94±2

CS400

98±2

93±1*

96±4

81±3*

CS500

97±5

98±1

96±2

41±3*

CS600

95±4

95±2

96±1

14±4*

Control

92±2

92±2

92±2

94±1

PL400

83±4*

74±3*

52±19*

no germination

PL500

77±2*

73±2*

47±10*

no germination

PL600

77±3*

74±3*

53±7*

no germination



Page 26 of 28

Figure 1. Total ion chromatograms from Py-GC-MS of poultry litter (PL) and cornstalk (CS) biochars.

OH

C2

MCounts 20

N H

PL 400

CN OH

CH3 C2

N N N H

10

n-alkanes/n-alkenes

CH3

N H

PL 500

5.0 N H

PL 600

N

1.0

N H

5

10

15

20 OH

C2

MCounts

25

30 min

35

OH

OH

OCH3

CH3

CS 400 OH OCH3 OCH3 OH

OH

5.0 C2

OCH3

CS 500 O

5.0

CS 600 O

5.0

5

10

15

20

25

30 min


35

Page 27 of 28


Figure 2. Total ion chromatograms obtained after (A) HS-SPME of volatile organic compounds and (B) DI-SPME of water extract of poultry litter biochar (PL400).

O O

Counts

O OH

OH

OH

O

2.6e+07

MeO

OH

2.4e+07

i.s.

O

2.2e+07

B

OH

O OH

i.s.

2e+07

OH

O

1.8e+07

OH

O

1.6e+07

OH

O

1.4e+07

O

COOH

OH

1.2e+07

OH O

1e+07

COOH OH

8e+06

O

6e+06

COOH

OH

4e+06 2e+06 10.00

12.00

14.00

16.00

18.00

20.00

22.00

24.00

26.00

28.00 Minutes

OH

N

O

N

6e+07

i.s.

C5

A

C2

S

5.5e+07

O O

O

N

S

5e+07 4.5e+07

MeO

CHO

O

Counts

OH

C2

O

O

C6-C10 hydrocarbons

N N

4e+07

O

O

N

NH2 N

3.5e+07 3e+07

OH

O

2.5e+07

O

OH C3

OH

2e+07 1.5e+07 1e+07 5e+06 2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

24


26

28

Minutes


Figure 3. Seed germination rates relative to control of original poultry litter biochar (PL400), water extracts and PL400 after post-treatments (solvent extraction and treatment with active sludge). Germination tests referred to a biochar load of 40 g/L. The germination rate of control (water only) is reported for comparison. *Indicates differences at the 0.05 level compared with the control by Dunnett’s tests.


Page 28 of 28

Relationships between Chemical Characteristics and Phytotoxicity of

Recommend Documents