Research and chemistry teaching - Journal of Chemical Education

Improving Teaching and Learning through Chemistry Education Research: A Look to the Future. Journal of Chemical Education. Gabel. 1999 76 (4), p 548...
0 downloads 0 Views 940KB Size
DOUGLAS D. SMITH Guillord High School Rockford. Illinois 61 11 1

Odd Man Out-A

Chemical Game

G. M. Armitage Jordanhill College School Glasgow, Scotland As teachers, we are always on the lookout for ideas or games to liven up or vary our routine chemistry courses. A word elimination game can be used to urovide an intertainine and

Each word is used once only. An essential feature of the idea is to build in some dearee of ambiguity-mercury is a metal and could he placed in C, hut this makes solution of the puzzle impossible. Bromine might perhaps be included in A as a colored gas but this, again, makes solution imoossible. Inclusion of a m b i a u i t ~compels students to consider more than one attribute of asuhstance in makina their classification. Here i;a more demanding example. 1. cerium

chemical significance. For example 1. argon 2. bromine 3. iron 4. nitrogen 5. sulfur

2. potassium 3. francium 4. gold 5. silver 6. einsteinium 7. chromium 8. nickel 9. teehneeium 10. calcium

6. mercury 7. chlorine 8. copper 9. fluorine

They are also provided with a list of clue designed to allow them to arrange the above words in pairs. The clues could

I I. radium 12. cobalt 13. lead 14. tungsten 15. germanium Ifi. curium 17. magnesium 18. sodium 19. zinc

T h e clues:

A. colored gases R. liquids C. metals D. colorless gases The four (4) clues allow eight(8) of the words to be paired and hence eliminated leaving one (1)over. The object of the game is to be left with the correct word a t the end of the game. The pairing are A. R. C. D.

The odd man out is 14-tungsten

7,9

2,6 3,8 1.4 5-sulfur-remains;

radioactive used for jewelry used to protect imn highly reactive E. magnetic F. named for scientists G. named for European countries H. alkaline earths I. can be tetravalent A. R. C. D.

the solution to the puzzle.

Research and Chemistry Teaching I.

Inductive versus Deductive Teaching Approaches

Herman and Hinchsman' conclude from their research study that for bigh school chemistry that there is little support for grouping students for inductive or deductive teaching if grouping is based on "IQ, gender, or trait anxiety." This seemed especially true if you are interested in long term retention (2 wk). Instruction in the study was to 299 ninth-grade advanced level sciencestudents from nine Sydney, Australia, high srhools. Stvichiometry was presented with linear programmed instruction booklets nnd audio tapes. Il