Sacrificing water quality for quantity

May 1, 2008 - National WaterQuality Assessment ... quality in study areas that sup ... River basin, evident in drops in the level of Lake Mead, the re...
0 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size
Sacrificing water quality for quantity

Interview

resource management that will impact both quality and quantity, including saltwater intrusion in coastal regions, wastewater treat­ ment infrastructure issues, and contamination from surface runoff in urban and rural areas. To pay for an inventory of water use in the U.S. (the first national NASA /RHONDA SAUNDERS

The western U.S. has faced a fullblown drought for the past 5 years, and last fall’s shocking drought in the Southeast U.S. may be a harbin­ ger of future problems. So it’s not too surprising that in the proposed budget for fiscal year 2009 (FY ’09), the Bush Administration has asked Congress to provide $3 million to

USGS water scientists have tracked water losses during the 5-year drought in the Colorado River basin, evident in drops in the level of Lake Mead, the recreational reservoir and water source created by the Hoover Dam for hydroelectric power. The red band shows water level decreases between 2000 and 2003.

the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) to assess water use nationwide. At the same time, however, the ad­ ministration has proposed slashing funding for USGS’s well-established National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) program. Water experts are concerned about money being taken away from programs that assess water quality, even if it is to focus more on water quantity. “Water avail­ ability is, frankly, a growing im­ pending crisis in this country,” says George Hallberg of the Cad­ mus Group, but he adds that both quality and quantity must be con­ sidered together. Hallberg notes several concerns for future water

assessment since the 1980s), other programs must be cut. NAWQA stands to lose 15% of its current funding, or nearly $10 million. That could lead to the elimination of 70 positions, mainly geochem­ ists, according to USGS. “Such reductions in NAWQA staff would be a major loss of intel­ lectual capital with many years of experience assessing water quality over broad regions and long peri­ ods of time,” USGS officials wrote in a synopsis of the cuts. Implica­ tions of the cuts also include the loss of testing for drinking-water quality in study areas that sup­ ply regions in seven states as well as the loss of data collection on 10

3126 ■ Environmental Science & Technology / May 1, 2008

aquifers that feed drinking-water wells across the U.S. “NAWQA is unique and irre­ placeable,” says Eileen O’Neill of the Water Environment Federa­ tion. “The USGS proposed budget is down $38 million from the 2008 budget,” she comments. Other USGS programs facing budget cuts include three core areas for the Toxic Substances Hydrology Pro­ gram: emerging environmental contaminants, pesticides in the en­ vironment, and watershed effects from hard-rock mining. “Water is becoming a key management issue, and one that is going to put limits on social and economic growth,” Hall­ berg says. New modeling re­ sults published online in Water Resources Research (2008, DOI 10.1029/2007WR006704) estimate a 50% chance that Lake Mead will be completely dry by 2021, as a result of drought, evaporation, expected growth in demand for Colorado River water, and climate change. The researchers calculate that the amount of water lost would be enough to serve 8 million people. “In the water management are­ na, we have never had a good da­ tabase,” comments Tracy Mehan, a former U.S. EPA administrator who is now a consultant with the Cadmus Group. “Whether it’s am­ bient water-quality data or a water census, we need data to under­ stand where the water uses are, so we can regulate them or man­ age” water properly. At odds with this mission, USGS has been losing stream gauges for many years, Me­ han points out. Even in states like Michigan, which issued a $45 mil­ lion state bond to collect 15 years of stream monitoring data, funding is running out. On a more positive note, the administration’s FY ’09 budget re­ quest adds $5 million for USGS stream gauges. The question now becomes whether Congress will feel enough pressure to set money aside for NAWQA while also fund­ ing the much-needed national wa­ ter census. —NAOMI LUBICK