Aug 1, 1971 - Science Education and the National Science Foundation. J. Chem. Educ. , 1971, 48 (8), p 514. DOI: 10.1021/ed048p514. Publication Date: ...
Science Education and the National Science Foundation. J. Chem. Educ. , 1971, 48 (8), p 514. DOI: 10.1021/ed048p514. Publication Date: August 1971.
EDITORIAL - National Science Foundation Philosophy. Walter J. Murphy. Ind. Eng. Chem. , 1949, 41 (5), pp 869â869. DOI: 10.1021/ie50473a001. Publication ...
Foundation (Instrument Grant CHE 81-09064) for the. 300-MHz NMR spectrometer used in these studies and the. National Institutes of Health that supported ...
of accountability.â The outcome, they suggest, would be a. âseamlessâ Kâ16 education system developed through atten- tion to instructional materials, teacher ...
National Science Education Standards. J. J. Lagowski. J. Chem. Educ. , 1995, 72 (4), p 287. DOI: 10.1021/ed072p287. Publication Date: April 1995. Cite this:J.
Cora B. Marrett has been acting director at NSF since March when Subra Suresh left to become president of Carnegie Mellon University. Córdova, 66, has ...
National Science Foundation Materials Chemistry Workshop. Chem. Mater. , 1998, 10 (5), pp 13â13. DOI: 10.1021/cm981001h. Publication Date (Web): April 16, ...
Apr 1, 1995 - National Science Education Standards. J. J. Lagowski. J. Chem. Educ. , 1995, 72 (4), p 287. DOI: 10.1021/ed072p287. Publication Date: April ...
National Science Foundation Materials Chemistry Workshop October 12â15, 2000 Portland, Oregon. Chem. Mater. , 2000, 12 (3), pp 12â12. DOI: 10.1021/ ...
We thank the National Science. Foundation and the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foun- dation (WARF) for support of this research. Supplementary Material ...
Science Education and the National Science Foundation
encourage the determination of the level of funding of science education on the basis of the value of science education to our society and the determination of the level of funding of research programs on the basis of the value of research to our society. The action of the House Authorization Subcommittee seems to place research and education in direct competition for funds. In this type of competition the total scientific community must invariably lose. There is the very real question of the relation of the support to science education to the number and the quality of professional scientists produced.. This depends
514
/
lournol o f Chemical Educafion
entirely upon the way the support is used. To focus exclusively on the production of professional scientists is to negate a very significant function of science education in our society. Only strong program in science education can justify a consistent, high level of support through NSF. Opportunities and responsibilities have been surveyed in "Science Education-The Task Ahead for The National Science Foundation" (NSF publication 7113). It remains to develop the programs to attain the goals appropriate to the changing needs of our society.
