Seasonal and annual source appointment of carbonaceous ultrafine

7 hours ago - Wood burning was a significant source of PM0.1 organic carbon (OC) during the winter months in northern California (17-47%) but made ...
2 downloads 0 Views 725KB Size
Subscriber access provided by University of Winnipeg Library

Characterization of Natural and Affected Environments

Seasonal and annual source appointment of carbonaceous ultrafine particulate matter (PM0.1) in polluted California cities Jian Xue, Wei Xue, Mohammad Sowlat, Constantinos Sioutas, Annabelle Lolinco, Alam S. Hasson, and Michael J. Kleeman Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b04404 • Publication Date (Web): 19 Nov 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on November 20, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 27

Environmental Science & Technology

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California – Davis, Davis, California, USA, 95616 bDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA, 90089 cDepartment of Chemistry, California State University – Fresno, Fresno, California, USA, 93740

25

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering

26

University of California

27

Davis, CA 95616

28

Phone: 530 752 8386

Seasonal and annual source appointment of carbonaceous ultrafine particulate matter (PM0.1) in polluted California cities Jian Xuea, Wei Xuea, Mohammad H. Sowlatb, Constantinos Sioutasb, Annabelle Lolincoc, Alam Hassonc, and Michael J. Kleemana,* a

*corresponding author: [email protected]

29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 2 of 27

42 43 44

Abstract

45

in California: Los Angeles, East Oakland, San Pablo, and over six months at Fresno. Molecular

46

markers adjusted for volatility and reactivity were used to calculate PM0.1 source contributions.

47

Wood burning was a significant source of PM0.1 organic carbon (OC) during the winter months in

48

northern California (17-47%) but made smaller contributions in other months (0-8%) and was

49

minor in all seasons in Los Angeles (0-5%), expect December (17%) during holiday celebrations.

50

Meat cooking was the largest source of PM0.1 OC across all sites (13-29%), followed by gasoline

51

combustion (7-21%). Motor oil and diesel fuel combustion made smaller contributions to PM0.1

52

OC (3-10% and 3-7%, respectively). Unresolved sources accounted for 22-56% of the PM0.1 OC.

53

The lack of a clear seasonal profile for this unresolved OC suggests that it may be a primary source

54

rather than secondary organic aerosol (SOA). PM0.1 elemental carbon (EC) was dominated by

55

diesel fuel combustion with less than 15% contribution from other sources. All sources besides

56

wood smoke exhibited relatively constant seasonal source contributions to PM0.1 OC reflecting

57

approximately constant emissions over the annual cycle. Annual-average source contributions to

58

PM0.1 OC calculated with traditional molecular markers were similar to the source contributions

59

calculated with the modified molecular markers that account for volatility and reactivity.

60 61 62 63

Samples of ultrafine particle matter mass (PM0.1) were collected over twelve months at three cities

Key word: Ultrafine particles, PM0.1, MOUDI, source apportionment

350 -3

PM0.1 EC/OC (ng m )

Average of four sampling sites across California PM0.1

250

OC EC

200 150 100

-3

64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73

PM2.5 EC/OC (µg m )

300

50 0

Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul

TOC

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 27

Environmental Science & Technology

74 75 76

1. Introduction

77

because of their high surface area that can adsorb toxic substances, which may then be translocated

78

to different regions of the body.1-4 The 1998 US National Research Council blueprint for

79

particulate matter (PM) research identified ultrafine particles as a research priority5. Fifteen years

80

later, the 2013 HEI Perspective on the Health Effects of Ultrafine Particles6 confirmed the robust

81

evidence for the toxicity of ultrafine particles but noted that epidemiological studies were

82

inconclusive due to inconsistencies and limitations in the findings from both short- and long-term

83

studies.7 The lack of consistent epidemiologic results was also a factor in the 2009 US-EPA

84

Integrated Science Assessment which concluded that the evidence was suggestive but not yet

85

sufficiently developed to infer a causal relationship between ultrafine particles and human health.8

86

A major limitation inherent in many epidemiological studies for ultrafine particles is simply

87

lack of consistent long-term measurements necessary to support an accurate exposure assessment

88

for all the features of interest. Ultrafine particle concentrations are typically quantified using

89

number concentration (NX; number of particles with diameter ≥ X nm) or mass (PM0.1; mass of

90

particles with diameter ≤ 0.1 µm). Total particle number concentration (NX) is continuously

91

measured at multiple locations in major California cities9,

92

ultrafine particle source contributions have been limited to shorter time periods (< 1 year) at a

93

smaller number of sites. 11-23 Recent epidemiological studies have found multiple adverse health

94

outcomes associated with PM0.1.

95

broader range of cities would help to fully test the relevant hypotheses about the potential health

96

effects of ultrafine particles.

Ultrafine particles (with aerodynamic diameter ≤ 0.1 µm) have toxic properties, possibly

24-26

10

but measurements for PM0.1 and

Longer-term (≥ 1 year) PM0.1 measurements spanning a

97

Here we describe a network of PM0.1 measurements and source apportionment calculations

98

carried out in four polluted California cities: Los Angeles (twelve months), East Oakland in the

99

San Francisco Bay Area (SFBA) (twelve months), San Pablo in the SFBA (twelve months), and

100

Fresno in the San Joaquin Valley (SJV) (six months). We focus on PM0.1 organic carbon (OC)

101

and elemental carbon (EC) concentrations at all locations since these two components are expected

102

to comprise +90% of the total PM0.1 mass.13 Source contributions to PM0.1 OC and EC are

103

calculated using molecular markers. Semi-volatile PM0.1 source profiles are developed to account

104

for partial evaporation of OC and molecular markers after dilution in the atmosphere. A method

105

to account for photochemical reaction is developed to account for the observed seasonal variation.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

106

The effects of these modifications on calculated PM0.1 source contributions are evaluated and

107

trends in PM0.1 concentrations and source contributions are discussed as a function of season and

108

location. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of an annual PM0.1 sampling

109

network with source apportionment in the world.

110

concentrations and source contributions will be a useful resource for testing PM0.1 exposure models

111

that can support future epidemiological studies.

The resulting dataset describing PM0.1

112 113 114

2. Sampling and analysis

115

2.1 Sampling sites and periods

116

The PM0.1 sampling network was deployed across four polluted cities spanning the wide range

117

of air quality issues experienced in California. Los Angeles is the largest city in California and the

118

second largest city in the United States. The Los Angeles (LA) site was located, on the campus of

119

the University of Southern California (USC), approximately 3 km to the south of downtown Los

120

Angeles. The LA site was 1 km from a major, heavily congested, interstate freeway (i.e., I-110)

121

and approximately 13 km from the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). Fresno is the largest

122

city in California’s heavily polluted San Joaquin Valley (SJV). The Fresno (FR) site was located

123

on the campus of California State University, Fresno, which is within 3 km of a moderately busy

124

highway (i.e., State Highway 99). The FR site was bounded by commercial/residential

125

neighborhoods on 3 sides and agricultural fields on the remaining side. The San Francisco Bay

126

Area has the highest population density in California. The San Pablo (SP) and East Oakland (EO)

127

monitoring sites were approximately 30 km apart in the Bay Area. Both SP and EO were

128

influenced by traffic, commercial, and residential sources, but their proximity to industrial sources

129

differed. Most notably, the SP location is within 5 km of a major chemical refinery, while the EO

130

location is within 5km of the Oakland International Airport and within 15 km of the Port of

131

Oakland. All the sampling locations are shown in Figure S4 in supporting information (SI).

132

The sampling period covered one year from August 2015 to July 2016 at the SP, EO and

133

LA sites, and 6 months (January-April, June-July 2016) at the FR site. Each sample collection

134

event lasted for 70-71 hours to collect sufficient PM0.1 mass for chemical analysis. Quality control

135

/ quality assurance checks were performed at the conclusion of each sample collection event prior

136

to the collection of the subsequent sample. Overall, 102, 110, 95 and 42 valid samples were

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 27

Page 5 of 27

Environmental Science & Technology

137

collected at SP, EO, LA and FR sites, respectively, covering 70-90% of the total sampling periods.

138

2.2 Sampling Methods

139

The detailed PM0.1 measurement methods used in this study have been described previously13,

140

14

141

(MOUDIs) were operated in parallel to collect PM0.1 samples that could be tested for both

142

carbonaceous speciation and elemental analysis. The first MOUDI was equipped with pre-baked

143

aluminum substrates (Foil 0100-96-0573A-X; MSP Corp., Shoreview, MN, USA) and quartz fiber

144

after-filters (Tissuquartz filters; Pall Corp., Port Washington, NY, USA) that were analyzed for

145

elemental carbon (EC), organic compounds (OC), and organic molecular markers, such as

146

cholesterol, levoglucosan, alkanes, etc. The second MOUDI was equipped with Teflon membrane

147

substrates (Teflo R2PJ047; Pall Corp., Port Washington, NY, USA) that were analyzed for trace

148

elements. Measurements from the aluminum MOUDI substrates are used for the analysis in the

149

current paper.

and so only a brief summary is presented here. Two Micro-Orifice Uniform Deposit Impactors

150

Each MOUDI was operated at the flow rate recommended by the manufacturer (30 L min-1)

151

with an AIHL-design cyclone placed upstream to remove particles with diameter larger than 1.8

152

µm due to their tendency to bounce off uncoated impaction stages.27 Ultrafine particles (DpEO>SP>FR. PM0.1 EC concentrations in downtown LA were higher than those

287

measured at other sites (p