Selective Ring-Opening of N-Alkyl Pyrrolidines with Chloroformates to

Jun 8, 2017 - *E-mail: [email protected]., *E-mail: [email protected]., *E-mail: [email protected]. ... Selective ring-opening reactions of N-methyl and N-e...
0 downloads 9 Views 1MB Size
Download PDF
Article pubs.acs.org/joc

Selective Ring-Opening of N‑Alkyl Pyrrolidines with Chloroformates to 4‑Chlorobutyl Carbamates Chunghyeon Yu,†,∇ Mahbubul Alam Shoaib,‡,∇ Naeem Iqbal,§ Jun Soo Kim,*,‡ Hyun-Joon Ha,*,∥ and Eun Jin Cho*,⊥ †

Department of Bionanotechnology, Hanyang University, Ansan 15588, Republic of Korea Department of Chemistry & Nanoscience, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea § National Institute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan ∥ Department of Chemistry, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Yongin 17053, Republic of Korea ⊥ Department of Chemistry, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea ‡

S Supporting Information *

ABSTRACT: Our study shows that among aza-heterocycles of various ring sizes, including aziridines, azetidines, pyrrolidines, and piperidines, only N-alkyl pyrrolidines undergo competitive reaction pathways with chloroformates to yield N-dealkylated pyrrolidines and 4-chlorobutyl carbamates. The pathway taken depends on the substituent on the nitrogen, i.e., ring-opening with methyl and ethyl substituents and dealkylation with a benzyl substituent. Computational calculations support the substituent-dependent product formation by showing the energy difference between the transition states of both reaction pathways. Selective ring-opening reactions of N-methyl and N-ethyl pyrrolidine derivatives with chloroformates were utilized to prepare various 4-chlorobutyl carbamate derivatives as valuable 1,4-bifunctional compounds.

1. INTRODUCTION Reaction of N-alkyl-substituted cyclic amines with chloroformates can adopt two different pathways: N-dealkylation and ring-opening. Both pathways involve the formation of a common ammonium ion intermediate arising from a nucleophilic acyl substitution and differ at the subsequent reaction of the chloride ion at two different sites of the intermediate (Scheme 1).1 Interestingly, it has been shown that the preference to either N-dealkylation or ring-opening processes varies with the size of the aza-ring. In general, reactions of N-alkyl aziridines and azetidines (three- and fourmembered rings, respectively) generate 2-chloroethyl and 3chloropropyl carbamates, respectively, through a ring-opening pathway with the release of ring strain [pathway (i), Scheme 1a].2,3 Instead, N-alkyl piperidines (six-membered rings) give the corresponding N-cyclic carbamates via the dominant dealkylation pathway [pathway (ii), Scheme 1b].4 In contrast, N-alkyl pyrrolidines (five-membered rings) may take both dealkylation and ring-opening pathways.5 Since the scopes of the earlier studies on N-alkyl pyrrolidines are limited to a few reaction examples, systematic studies of a selective transformation of N-alkyl pyrrolidines are needed. This report describes the selective ring-opening reactions of N-methyl and N-ethyl pyrrolidines with chloroformates to generate various 4chlorobutyl carbamate derivatives as valuable 1,4-bifunctional butane compounds [Scheme 1c]. Corroborated evidence for the selective transformation was found in the energy difference between the transition states of both reaction pathways © 2017 American Chemical Society

obtained from computational calculations based on density functional theory (DFT). Synthesis of 1,4-bifunctional chloroalkyl carbamates is challenging due to the presence of both nucleophilic and electrophilic moieties in the molecule. 4-Chlorobutyl carbamates are valuable compounds and can be utilized in many synthetic transformations, such as coupling reactions. They can also be easily converted to isocyanates and amine derivatives.

2. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION To understand the dependence of selectivity on the N-alkyl substituent, we initiated our studies by investigating the reaction of several N-alkyl pyrrolidines (1) with isopropyl chloroformate (2a) (Scheme 2). The reaction of N-1cyclohexenyl pyrrolidine (1a) with 2a in CH2Cl2 was unselective and generated a mixture of dealkylated and ringopened products [Scheme 2(1)], and the reaction of N-benzyl pyrrolidine (1b) with 2a in CH2Cl2 gave mainly the debenzylated product [Scheme 2(2)].3a On the contrary, the reactions of N-ethyl (1c) and N-methyl pyrrolidines (1d) with 2a selectively provided the corresponding 4-chlorobutyl carbamates (4) via the ring-opening pathway [Scheme 2(3) and (4)]. These results suggest that the preference to either the N-dealkylation or ring-opening pathway is highly dependent on the N-alkyl substituent. Received: March 22, 2017 Published: June 8, 2017 6615

DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.7b00681 J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 6615−6620

Article

The Journal of Organic Chemistry Scheme 1. (a) Ring-Opening Reactions of N-Alkyl Aziridines and Azetidines via Pathway (i), (b) N-Dealkylation of NAlkyl Piperidines via Pathway (ii), and (c) Our Strategy for the Selective Ring-Opening Reaction of N-Alkyl Pyrrolidines

Scheme 2. Reactions of N-Alkyl Pyrrolidines (1) with Isopropyl Chloroformate (2a)a

Figure 1. Energy profiles for the stationary points corresponding to the reaction of 2a with 1d (1) and 1b (2).

a

and isopropyl chloroformate (2a). Starting from the intermediate complex (I-1d/2a) of the ammonium intermediate and the chloride ion, two reaction pathways can be hypothesized: one leading to the ring-opened product and the other to the demethylated product. The relative energies of the transition states and products in both pathways were calculated. Demethylated product 3 was obtained through transition state TS-1d/2a, and ring-opened product 4da was obtained through transition state TS′-1d/2a. The difference in energy between the two transition states is 3.92 kcal/mol, corresponding to a 100/0 ratio of products 4da/3. Thus, the ring-opening pathway yielding product 4da is kinetically more favorable than the demethylation pathway yielding 3. This result is in good agreement with the observed exclusive formation of 4da shown in Scheme 2(4).11 The same trend was observed in the DFT calculation results for the reaction between N-ethyl pyrrolidine (1c) and isopropyl chloroformate (2a) (Figure S1 in Supporting Information). Figure 1(2) shows the preference of the dealkylation pathway in the reaction of N-benzyl pyrrolidine (1b) with isopropyl chloroformate (2a). The debenzylated product (3) is both kinetically and thermodynamically more favorable than the ring-opened product (4ba); this result also fits with the experimental results shown in Scheme 2(2). This favorable Ndebenzylation was previously reported in the work of Couty, Evano, and co-workers by experiments and DFT calculations for the reaction of N-benzyl pyrrolidine with methyl chloroformate.3a

Yields of isolated products.

We assumed that the different reaction pathways taken by the N-alkyl pyrrolidines are strongly influenced by the conformation of the ammonium intermediates with chloride ion, which is determined by the N-alkyl substituent. This idea was supported by a computational approach through DFT calculations,6 showing that the energies of the transition states of two reaction pathways significantly depend on the N-alkyl substituent. DFT calculations were performed using Gaussian 09 program7 with the hybrid B3LYP8 exchange−correlation functional and the 6-31++G(d,p)9 basis set. The solvation effect by CH2Cl2 was taken into account by the polarization continuum model using IEFPCM.10 Figure 1(1) shows the possible reaction pathways between N-methyl pyrrolidine (1d) 6616

DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.7b00681 J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 6615−6620

Article

The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Table 2. Substrate Scope for Ring-Opening Pathway of NMethyl and N-Ethyl Pyrrolidine Derivativesa

Having recognized the dependence of reactivity with the Nalkyl substituent of the pyrrolidines, the ring-opening process was utilized for the selective formation of valuable 4chlorobutyl carbamate derivatives using N-methyl or N-ethylsubstituted pyrrolidines. First, we studied the solvent and concentration effect on the selective ring-opening reaction of N-methyl pyrrolidine (1d) and isopropyl chloroformate (2a) as model substrates (Table 1). While chlorinated solvents including CH2Cl2, CHCl3 Table 1. Optimization Studies with 1da

entry

solvent

concentration (M)

yield (%)c

1 2 3 4 5 6

CH2Cl2 CHCl3 C2H4Cl2 CH3CN CH2Cl2 CH2Cl2

0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.05

86 83 81 31 79 70

a

Reaction conditions: 1d (0.1 mmol), 2a (0.14 mmol). b2a (1.0 M in toluene). cThe yields were determined by gas chromatography with dodecane as an internal standard.

(chloroform), and C2H4Cl2 (dichloroethane) worked well (Table 1, entries 1−3), CH3CN (acetonitrile) showed a relatively low reactivity (Table 1, entry 4) despite the same regioselectivity for the ring-opening process.12 The reaction concentration did not show a significant effect on the reactivity (Table 1, entries 1, 5, and 6). It is noted that the selective transformation proceeds under extremely mild conditions of room temperature and in the absence of any additional additives. Next, we explored the reaction scope of the ring-opening process under the optimized conditions (0.2 M concentration in CH2Cl2) (Table 2). Several N-methyl and N-ethyl pyrrolidine derivatives (1) reacted efficiently with isopropyl chloroformate (2a) or isobutyl chloroformate (2b) to give the corresponding (4-chlorobutyl) (alkyl) carbamate derivatives in moderate to good yields. Notably, the abundant and wellknown small natural product nicotine (1e) was utilized as a substrate toward the selective ring-opening process, providing highly functionalized chiral compounds (Table 2, entries 5 and 6). N-methyl indoline (1f) and N-ethyl indoline (1g) were also suitable substrates for the transformation (Table 2, entries 7− 10). The reaction of N-ethyl ethyl prolinate (1h) provided a mixture of regioisomeric ring-opened products (Table 2, entries 11 and 12). Interestingly, the reaction of the substrate containing a hydroxyl group, N-methyl-2-pyrrolidine ethanol (1i), generated ring-expanded oxepane-product 4ia′ by a further consecutive intramolecular nucleophilic substitution between the chloride and hydroxyl group of the ring-opened product (4ia) (Scheme 3). The generality of the ring-opening process was further investigated using 1d with various acid chloride derivatives, including benzyl chloroformate (5), allyl chloroformate (7), 4chlorobenzoyl chloride (9), and p-toluenesulfonyl chloride (11) (Scheme 4). Despite the high regioselectivity of the ringopening process, the reactions provided low yields of products

a

Reaction conditions: 1a (1 mmol), 2a (1.4 mmol). b2a (1.0 M in toluene). cIsolated yield. d48 h reaction time. e30 h reaction time. f0.5 mmol scale. gThe minor regioisomeric position is labeled with “*”.

Scheme 3. Reaction of 1i with 2a

with large amounts of acid chloride substrates remaining unreacted. Nevertheless, increasing the reaction temperature to 80 °C did not improve the reactivity, and similar yields were obtained. Given the selectivity dependence of ring-opening and dealkylation pathways on the size of the aza-rings, the reaction 6617

DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.7b00681 J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 6615−6620

Article

The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Supporting Information. 1H NMR experiments are reported in units, parts per million (ppm), and were measured relative to residual chloroform (7.26 ppm) and dimethyl sulfoxide (2.50 ppm) in the deuterated solvent. 13C NMR spectra are reported in ppm relative to deuterochloroform (77.23 ppm), and all were obtained with 1H decoupling. Coupling constants were reported in Hz. FT-IR spectra were recorded on a Nicolet iS 10 ThermoFisher FT-IR spectrometer. Reactions were monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) and GC-MS using the Agilent GC 7890B/5977A inert MSD with TripleAxis Detector. Mass spectral data of all unknown compounds were obtained from the Korea Basic Science Institute (Daegu) on a Jeol JMS 700 high-resolution mass spectrometer. The mass analyzer type used for HRMS measurements is quadrupole. The chiralities of 4ea and 4eb were determined by polarimeter using the Rudolph Research Analytical Autopol IV. Method for DFT Calculation. DFT was used with hybrid B3LYP exchange−correlation functional and 6-31++G(d,p) basis set. Using the Gaussian 09 program, all the molecules were optimized within the polarizable continuum model. The absence of vibrational normal modes with imaginary frequencies was checked to verify the quality of minimization procedure except for the transition state (TS) calculations. The TS geometries were verified by confirming the presence of vibrational normal modes with an imaginary frequency. General Experimental Procedure for the Synthesis of 4Chlorobutyl Carbamate (4). A tube equipped with a magnetic stirring bar was charged with N-alkyl pyrrolidine 1 (1 mmol). Then, CH2Cl2 (5 mL, 0.20 M) and isopropyl chloroformate 2a (1.0 M in toluene, 1.4 mmol) were added, and the mixture was allowed to stir at room temperature for 2−10 h. The reaction was monitored by TLC. Upon completion, the reaction mixture was concentrated using a rotary evaporator and purified by silica gel column chromatography to give the corresponding 4-chlorobutyl carbamate 4. 3:3a 102 mg, 65%, colorless oil; 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.90 (hept, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H), 3.39−3.34 (m, 2H), 3.32−3.27 (m, 2H), 1.88− 1.78 (m, 4H), 1.23 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 155.2, 68.1, [46.2 and 45.9 (rotamers)], [25.9 and 25.2 (rotamers)], 22.6; MS m/z (EI) calcd for C8H15NO2 [M+] 157.1103, found 157.0; Rf 0.66 (hex/EtOAc, 4/1). 4ba:3a 59 mg, 21%, colorless oil; 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.32 (dd, J = 7.5, 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.29−7.18 (m, 3H), 4.98 (hept, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H), 4.47 (s, 2H, rotamers), 3.56−3.46 (m, 2H), 3.32−3.14 (m, 2H), 1.80−1.55 (m, 4H), 1.26 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 6H, rotamers); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 156.6, 138.3, 128.7, 128.0, 127.5, 69.0, [50.4 and 50.2 (rotamers)], [46.0 and 45.3 (rotamers)], [44.9 and 44.8 (rotamers)], 29.9, [25.6 and 25.3 (rotamers)], 22.4; MS m/z (EI) calcd for C15H22ClNO2 [M+] 283.1339, found 283.1; Rf 0.47 (hex/ EtOAc, 4/1). 4ca: 201 mg, 91%, colorless oil; 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.88 (hept, J = 6.2 Hz 1H), 3.52 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 3.28−3.16 (m, 4H), 1.74 (tt, J = 6.8, 6.6 Hz, 2H), 1.64 (tt, J = 7.0, 6.8 Hz, 2H), 1.20 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 6H), 1.07 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ [156.1 and 155.8 (rotamers)], 68.3, [46.1 and 45.5 (rotamers)], 44.8, [42.0 and 41.7 (rotamers)], 29.9, [26.1 and 25.9 (rotamers)], 22.4, [14.0 and 13.5 (rotamers)]; IR (neat): νmax = 2977, 2934, 1684, 1421, 1265, 1176, 1111, 910, 728 cm−1; HRMS m/z (EI) calcd for C10H20ClNO2 [M+] 221.1183, found 221.1180; Rf 0.52 (hex/EtOAc, 4/1). 4cb: 219 mg, 93%, colorless oil; 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.83 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 3.53 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 3.32−3.12 (m, 4H), 1.90 (hept of t, J = 6.8, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 1.75 (tt, J = 6.8, 6.4 Hz, 2H), 1.66 (tt, J = 7.1, 6.8 Hz, 2H), 1.10 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.91 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ [156.6 and 156.3 (rotamers)], 71.5, [46.2 and 45.9 (rotamers)], 44.8, [42.2 and 41.8 (rotamers)], 29.9, 28.2, [26.3 and 25.8 (rotamers)], 19.3, [14.0 and 13.5 (rotamers)]; IR (neat): νmax = 2960, 1693, 1423, 1265, 1177, 1074, 1005, 770 cm−1; HRMS m/z (EI) calcd for C11H22ClNO2 [M+] 235.1339, found 235.1336; Rf 0.51 (hex/EtOAc, 4/1). 4da: 176 mg, 85%, colorless oil; 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.83 (hept, J = 6.3 Hz 1H), 3.50 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 3.27−3.17 (m, 2H), 2.81 (s, 3H), 1.70 (tt, J = 6.5, 6.0 Hz, 2H), 1.61 (tt, J = 6.5, 6.5

Scheme 4. Reaction of 1d with Various Acid Chloride Derivatives

of the natural product tropine (13) is of particular interest because the amine in 13 is part of a five- and a seven-membered ring at the same time. As an N-methyl-substituted fivemembered ring amine, it would be expected to undergo a ring-opening process. Instead, a selective demethylation occurs, and 14 is exclusively obtained, together with unreacted 13; the ring-opened product is not observed (Scheme 5). The energy profiles of both reaction pathways are shown in Figure S2 (Supporting Information). Scheme 5. Reaction of Tropine (13) with 2a

3. CONCLUSIONS In summary, we have described the selective ring-opening reactions of N-methyl and N-ethyl pyrrolidine derivatives with chloroformates to generate 4-chlorobutyl carbamate derivatives. The selectivity of the pathway is highly dependent on the Nalkyl substituent on the pyrrolidine ring, and the results are supported by DFT calculations. Readily available substituted Nalkyl pyrrolidines including nicotine and indoline could be utilized to generate highly 1,4-bifunctionalized 4-chlorobutyl carbamate derivatives via the ring-opening process. We believe that this method will provide a wide range of applications in organic synthesis and medicinal chemistry. 4. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION General Information. CH2Cl2, CHCl3, C2H4Cl2, and CH3CN were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich chemical company in Sure-Seal bottles. All other reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Alfa Aesar, or TCI companies. Flash column chromatography was performed using Merck silica gel 60 (70−230 mesh). General Analytical Information. The (4-chlorobutyl) (alkyl) carbamate products were characterized by 1H, 13C NMR, and FT-IR spectroscopy. NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian 600 MHz instrument (600 MHz for 1H NMR and 151 MHz for 13C NMR). Copies of 1H and 13C NMR spectra can be found at the end of the 6618

DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.7b00681 J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 6615−6620

Article

The Journal of Organic Chemistry Hz, 2H), 1.17 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 156.2, 68.4, [47.8 and 47.6 (rotamers)], [44.7 and 44.6 (rotamers)], [34.3 and 33.7 (rotamers)], 29.6, [25.2 and 24.9 (rotamers)], 22.3; IR (neat): νmax = 2978, 2934, 1687, 1177, 1111, 923, 729 cm−1; HRMS m/z (EI) calcd for C9H18ClNO2 [M+] 207.1026, found 207.1026; Rf 0.51 (hex/EtOAc, 4/1). 4db: 201 mg, 91%, colorless oil; 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.83 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 2H), 3.57−3.52 (m, 2H), 3.32−3.24 (m, 2H), 2.88 (s, 3H), 1.91 (hept of t, J = 6.7, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 1.75 (tt, J = 6.7, 6.4 Hz, 2H), 1.67 (tt, J = 7.1, 6.7 Hz, 2H), 0.92 (d, J = 6.7, Hz, 6H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 156.8, 71.7, 48.1, [44.9 and 44.7 (rotamers)], [34.6 and 33.9 (rotamers)], 29.8, 28.2, [25.5 and 25.0 (rotamers)], 19.3; IR (neat): νmax = 2958, 1694, 1465, 1186, 1127, 770 cm−1; HRMS m/z (EI) calcd for C10H20ClNO2 [M+] 221.1183, found 221.1184; Rf 0.43 (hex/EtOAc, 4/1). 4ea: 168 mg, 59%, light yellow oil; 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.42 (s, 1H), 8.35 (d, J = 4.9 Hz, 1H), 7.55 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (dd, J = 7.9, 4.9 Hz, 1H), 4.82 (hept, J = 5.9 Hz, 1H), 4.76−4.64 (m, 1H), 3.26−3.15 (m, 1H), 3.11−3.02 (m, 1H), 2.64 (s, 3H), 1.96−1.86 (m, 1H), 1.85−1.75 (m, 1H), 1.60−1.49 (m, 1H), 1.47−1.32 (m, 1H), 1.01 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ [156.0 and 155.7 (rotamers)], 149.3, 148.1, [137.2 and 137.0 (rotamers)], 134.2, 123.4, 68.2, 60.0, [47.3 and 47.2 (rotamers)], 36.5, [34.0 and 33.3 (rotamers)], [25.0 and 24.5 (rotamers)], 22.0; IR (neat): νmax = 2979, 1683, 1401, 1199, 1111, 908, 726 cm−1; HRMS m/z (EI) calcd for C14H21ClN2O2 [M+] 284.1292, found 284.1289; [α]25 = +4.55 (c 1.0, CHCl3); Rf 0.46 (hex/EtOAc, 2/1). 4eb: 200 mg, 67%, light yellow oil; 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.57 (s, 1H), 8.52 (d, J = 4.7 Hz, 1H), 7.70 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.28 (dd, J = 7.8, 4.7 Hz, 1H), 4.99−4.80 (m, 1H), 3.81 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 3.42−3.21 (m, 2H), 2.83 (s, 3H), 2.12−2.02 (m, 1H), 2.02−1.92 (m, 1H), 1.92−1.82(m, 1H), 1.74 (t of hept, J = 6.6, 5.9 Hz, 1H), 1.64− 1.51 (m, 1H), 0.88(d, J = 5.9 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ [156.8 and 156.6 (rotamers)], 149.7, 148.5, [137.5 and 137.3 (rotamers)], 134.5, 123.7, 71.7, 60.4, [47.9 and 47.8 (rotamers)], [37.1 and 36.9 (rotamers)], [34.6 and 33.8 (rotamers)], 28.2, [25.5 and 25.0 (rotamers)], 19.2; IR (neat): νmax = 2959, 1694, 1427, 1195, 1137, 713 cm−1; HRMS m/z (EI) calcd for C15H23ClN2O2 [M+] 298.1448, found 298.1450; [α]25 = +22.50 (c 1.0, CHCl3); Rf 0.44 (hex/EtOAc, 1/1). 4fa: 115 mg, 45%, light yellow oil; 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3, rotamers major:minor = 2:1) δ 7.31−7.24 (m, 3H), 7.20−7.06 (m, 1H), 5.00−4.87 (m, 1H), 3.81−3.62 (m, 2H), 3.19 (s, 3H), 3.04−2.95 (m, 2H), 1.36−1.02 (m, 6H); 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, rotamers major:minor = 2:1) δ 7.42−7.37 (m, 1H), 7.31−7.26 (m, 2H), 7.25−7.18 (m, 1H), 4.86−4.74 (m, 1H), 3.82 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 3.34 (s, 3H), 2.96−2.90 (m, 2H), 1.34−0.94 (m, 6H); 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, 358 K) δ 7.37 (dd, J = 6.2, 3.3 Hz, 1H), 7.32−7.24 (m, 2H), 7.18 (dd, J = 6.4, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 4.82 (hept, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H), 3.81 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 3.13 (s, 3H), 2.97 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.25− 1.01 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 155.8, [142.7 and 142.2 (rotamers)], [136.0 and 135.6 (rotamers)], 130.2, [128.3 and 128.2 (rotamers)] 128.0, 127.8, 69.2, 43.7, 38.1, [34.9 and 34.5 (rotamers)], 22.1; IR (neat): νmax = 2978, 1694, 1373, 1300, 1163, 1107, 981, 913, 768, 713 cm−1; HRMS m/z (EI) calcd for C13H18ClNO2 [M+] 255.1026, found 255.1023; Rf 0.46 (hex/ EtOAc, 4/1). 4fb: 108 mg, 40%, light yellow oil; 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3, rotamers major:minor = 2:1) δ 7.32−7.24 (m, 3H), 7.20−7.10 (m, 1H), 4.02−3.62 (m, 4H), 3.21 (s, 3H), 3.01 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.72 (m, 1H), 1.05−0.65 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 156.3, [142.7 and 142.1 (rotamers)], [136.0 and 135.7 (rotamers)], 130.3, [128.4 and 128.2 (rotamers)], 128.0, 127.9, 72.0, 43.8, 38.2, [34.8 and 34.5 (rotamers)], [28.2 and 28.0 (rotamers)], [19.3 and 19.0 (rotamers)]; IR (neat): νmax = 2960, 1698, 1352, 1155, 1003, 907, 729, 648 cm−1; HRMS m/z (EI) calcd for C14H20ClNO2 [M+] 269.1183, found 269.1183; Rf 0.49 (hex/EtOAc, 4/1). 4ga: 183 mg, 68%, light yellow oil; 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.32−7.22 (m, 3H), 7.20−7.02 (m, 1H), 5.02−4.87 (m, 1H), 3.91− 3.68 (m, 2H), 3.69−3.63 (m, 1H), 3.43−3.33 (m, 1H), 3.09−3.02 (m,

1H), 2.99−2.92 (m, 1H), 1.40−1.00 (m, 9H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 155.4, 140.5, 136.1, 130.1, 129.4, 128.1, 127.8, 69.0, 45.4, 43.6, [34.8 and 34.4 (rotamers)], 29.8, 22.2, [14.2 and 13.5(rotamers)]; MS m/z (EI) calcd for C14H20ClNO2 [M+] 269.1183, found 269.1; Rf 0.45 (hex/EtOAc, 3/1). 4gb: 218 mg, 77%, light yellow oil; 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.35−7.22 (m, 3H), 7.20−7.06 (m, 1H), 4.03−3.60 (m, 5H), 3.47− 3.28 (m, 1H), 3.09−3.03 (m, 1H), 3.03−2.96 (m, 1H), 1.80−1.65 (m, 1H), 1.40−0.50 (m, 9H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 155.8, 140.3, [136.2 and 136.0 (rotamers)], 130.0, 129.3, 127.8, 127.7, 71.6, 45.2, 43.5, [34.4 and 34.2 (rotamers)], 28.0, [19.1 and 19.0 (rotamers)], 14.1, 13.4; MS m/z (EI) calcd for C15H22ClNO2 [M+] 283.1339, found 283.1; Rf 0.49 (hex/EtOAc, 3/1). 4ha: 126 mg, 86%, light yellow oil; Regioisomer major:minor = 2:1; Major isomer: 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.91 (hept, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 4.38−4.18 (m, 1H), 4.23 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.37−3.15 (m, 4H), 2.06−1.96 (m, 1H), 1.96−1.87 (m, 1H), 1.76−1.69 (m, 1H), 1.69−1.60 (m, 1H), 1.32−1.07 (m, 12H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 169.6, [156.5 and 156.1 (rotamers)], 68.4, 62.1, 59.2, [45.9 and 45.4 (rotamers)], [42.6 and 42.0 (rotamers)], 32.1, 29.6, [25.3 and 25.0 (rotamers)], 22.3, 14.1; minor isomer: 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.94 (hept, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 4.54−4.47 (m, 1H), 4.21−4.08 (m, 2H), 3.62−3.52 (m, 2H), 3.52−3.31 (m, 1H), 3.19−3.03 (m, 1H), 2.18−2.10 (m, 1H), 2.03−1.87 (m, 1H), 1.87−1.80 (m, 2H), 1.32− 1.08 (m, 12H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ [171.5 and 171.4 (rotamers)], [155.8 and 155.4 (rotamers)], 69.0, 61.2, [59.3 and 59.0 (rotamers)], 44.6, [41.7 and 40.9 (rotamers)], [30.0 and 29.8 (rotamers)], [25.3 and 25.0 (rotamers)], 22.2, 14.2, [13.9 and 13.4 (rotamers)]; MS m/z (EI) calcd for C13H24ClNO4 [M+] 293.1394, found 293.1; Rf 0.47 (hex/EtOAc, 4/1). 4hb: 138 mg, 90%, light yellow oil; Regioisomer major:minor = 2:1; major isomer: 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.40−4.20 (m, 1H), 4.21 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.83 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 3.56−2.91 (m, 4H), 2.10−1.81 (m, 3H), 1.80−1.55 (m, 2H), 1.28 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.10 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.92 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 169.7, [156.6 and 156.3 (rotamers)], 71.6, 62.2, 57.3, [46.1 and 45.8 (rotamers)], [42.3 and 41.8 (rotamers)], 32.3, 28.2, [25.5 and 25.0 (rotamers)], 19.4, 14.2, [14.0 and 13.5 (rotamers)]; minor isomer: 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.30−4.08 (m, 3H), 3.91 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 3.52 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 3.54−3.34 (m, 1H), 3.23−3.03 (m, 1H), 2.26−2.09 (m, 1H), 2.03−1.82 (m, 4H), 1.26 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.18 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.99−0.85 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ [171.6 and 171.4 (rotamers)], 157.1, 72.0, 61.4, [59.4 and 59.2 (rotamers)], 44.6, 41.0, 29.6, 28.3, [27.7 and 27.1 (rotamers)], 19.31, 19.29, [14.0 and 13.5 (rotamers)]; MS m/z (EI) calcd for C14H26ClNO4 [M+] 307.1550, found 307.1; Rf 0.52 (hex/ EtOAc, 4/1). 4ia′: 170 mg, 79%, light yellow oil; 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.51 (hept, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H), 4.02−3.93 (m, 1H), 3.87−3.81 (m, 1H), 3.45−3.36 (m, 1H), 3.10−3.02 (m, 1H), 2.85−2.78 (m, 1H), 2.58 (s, 3H), 2.11−2.00 (m, 2H), 2.00−1.87 (m, 1H), 1.87−1.75 (m, 2H), 1.65−1.55 (m, 1H), 0.96 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.70, 71.8, 65.4, 63.5, [55.3 and 55.2 (rotamers)], 38.4, 29.1, 28.8, 21.2, 21.0; IR (neat): νmax = 2983, 1736, 1261, 1093, 907, 723 cm−1; HRMS m/z (EI) calcd for C11H21NO3 [M+] 215.1521, found 215.1522; Rf 0.44. (hex/EtOAc, 1/1).

■

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

S Supporting Information *

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.7b00681. Additional DFT calculation results, 1H and 13C NMR spectra of products (PDF)

■

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Corresponding Authors

*E-mail: [email protected]. *E-mail: [email protected]. 6619

DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.7b00681 J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 6615−6620

Article

The Journal of Organic Chemistry *E-mail: [email protected].

(9) Hehre, W. J.; Radom, L.; Schleyer, P. v. R.; Pople, J. A. Ab initio Molecular Orbital Theory; Wiley: New York, 1986. (10) Tomasi, J.; Mennucci, B.; Cammi, R. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 2999. (11) The selectivity can be better explained based on kinetic and thermodynamic control than by the concept of hard and soft acids and bases theory, see: Mayr, H.; Breugst, M.; Ofial, A. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 6470. (12) The energy profiles of the reaction in CH3CN are shown as Figure S3 in the Supporting Information.

ORCID

Jun Soo Kim: 0000-0001-8113-0605 Eun Jin Cho: 0000-0002-6607-1851 Author Contributions ∇

These authors contributed equally.

Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

■

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea [2014R1A5A1011165 (Science Research Center), NRF-2012M3A7B4049657 and NRF-2012M3A7B4049645 (Nano Material Technology Development Program)].

■

REFERENCES

(1) (a) Cooley, J. H.; Evain, E. J. Synthesis 1989, 1989, 1. (b) Synthesis of 4- to 7-membered heterocycles by ring expansion; D’hooghe, M.; Ha, H.-J., Eds.; Springer: Heidelberg, 2016. (2) Examples of reactions of N-alkyl aziridines with chloroformates, see: (a) Sim, T. B.; Kang, S. H.; Lee, K. S.; Lee, W. K.; Yun, H.; Dong, Y.; Ha, H.-J. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 104. (b) Kim, Y.; Ha, H.-J.; Yun, H.; Lee, B. K.; Lee, W. K. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 8844. (3) Examples of reactions of N-alkyl azetidines with chloroformates, see: (a) Vargas-Sanchez, M.; Lakhdar, S.; Couty, F.; Evano, G. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5501. (b) Ma, S.-h.; Yoon, D. H.; Ha, H.-J.; Lee, W. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 269. (4) Examples of reactions of N-alkyl piperidines with chloroformates, see: (a) Hobson, J. D.; McCluskey, J. G. J. Chem. Soc. C 1967, 2015. (b) Rice, K. C. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40, 1850. (c) Olofson, R. A.; Schnur, R. C.; Bunes, L.; Pepe, J. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 18, 1567. (d) Olofson, R. A.; Martz, J. T.; Senet, J. P.; Piteau, M.; Malfroot, T. J. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 2081. (e) Miller, M. W.; Vice, S. F.; McCombie, S. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 3429. (f) Bhat, R. G.; Ghosh, Y.; Chandrasekaran, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 7983. (g) Igarashi, J.; Kobayashi, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 6381. (h) Č asar, Z.; Mesar, T. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2015, 19, 378. (5) Examples of reactions of N-alkyl pyrrolidines, see refs 3a and 4f: (a) Bleicher, L. S.; Cosford, D. P. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 5299. (b) Cocquet, G.; Ferroud, C.; Guy, A. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 2975. (c) Kroon, M. C.; Buijs, W.; Peters, C. J.; Witkamp, G. Green Chem. 2006, 8, 241. (d) Tayama, E.; Takedachi, K.; Iwamoto, H.; Hasegawa, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 1373. (6) (a) Parr, R. G.; Yang, W. Density Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules; Oxford University Press: New York, 1989. (b) Ziegler, T. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91, 651. (7) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Caricato, M.; Li, X.; Hratchian, H. P.; Izmaylov, A. F.; Bloino, J.; Zheng, G.; Sonnenberg, J. L.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Vreven, T.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Peralta, J. E.; Ogliaro, F.; Bearpark, M.; Heyd, J. J.; Brothers, E.; Kudin, K. N.; Staroverov, V. N.; Kobayashi, R.; Normand, J.; Raghavachari, K.; Rendell, A.; Burant, J. C.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Cossi, M.; Rega, N.; Millam, J. M.; Klene, M.; Knox, J. E.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken, V.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Martin, R. L.; Morokuma, K.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Farkas, Ö .; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cioslowski, J.; Fox, D. J. Gaussian 09, Revision B.01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford CT, 2009. (8) (a) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648. (b) Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1988, 37, 785. 6620

DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.7b00681 J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 6615−6620