Shallow Gas Migration along Hydrocarbon Wells–An Unconsidered

Switzerland. Environ. Sci. Technol. , 2017, 51 (17), pp 10262–10268. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b02732. Publication Date (Web): August 1, 2017. Copyr...
0 downloads 9 Views 3MB Size
Subscriber access provided by UNIVERSITY OF THE SUNSHINE COAST

Article

Shallow gas migration along hydrocarbon wells – An unconsidered, anthropogenic source of biogenic methane in the North Sea Lisa Vielstädte, Matthias Haeckel, Jens Karstens, Peter Linke, Mark Schmidt, Lea Steinle, and Klaus Wallmann Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b02732 • Publication Date (Web): 01 Aug 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on August 5, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 27

Environmental Science & Technology

1

Shallow gas migration along hydrocarbon wells – An unconsidered,

2

anthropogenic source of biogenic methane in the North Sea

3

Lisa Vielstädte1,2,*, Matthias Haeckel1, Jens Karstens1, Peter Linke1, Mark Schmidt1, Lea

4

Steinle1,3, and Klaus Wallmann1

5

1

GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Germany

6

2

Department for Earth System Science, Stanford University, USA

7

3

Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel, Switzerland

8

9

Keywords: methane emissions │ abandoned wells │ oil and gas │ North Sea

10

11

Abstract

12

Shallow gas migration along hydrocarbon wells constitutes a potential methane emission

13

pathway that currently is not recognized in any regulatory framework or greenhouse gas

14

inventory. Recently, the first methane emission measurements at three abandoned offshore wells

15

in the Central North Sea (CNS) were conducted showing that considerable amounts of biogenic

16

methane originating from shallow gas accumulations in the overburden of deep reservoirs were

17

released by the boreholes. Here, we identify numerous wells poking through shallow gas pockets

18

in 3-D seismic data of the CNS indicating that about one third of the wells may leak, potentially

19

releasing a total of 3-17 kt of methane per year into the North Sea. This poses a significant

20

contribution to the North Sea methane budget. A large fraction of this gas (~42 %) may reach the

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

21

atmosphere via direct bubble transport (0-2 kt yr-1) and via diffusive exchange of methane

22

dissolving in the surface mixed layer (1-5 kt yr-1), as indicated by numerical modeling. In the

23

North Sea and in other hydrocarbon-prolific provinces of the world shallow gas pockets are

24

frequently observed in the sedimentary overburden and aggregate leakages along the numerous

25

wells drilled in those areas may be significant.

26

27

Introduction

28

Gas leakage from hydrocarbon infrastructure is a major concern because the primary fugitive

29

component of petroleum and natural gas is methane (CH4), which has a significant global

30

warming potential1. However, regular monitoring of wells is only mandatory during the active

31

life time of the well and is solely targeted at the leakage of thermogenic gas and formation fluids

32

from the deep reservoir2-3. As such, emissions reported by the industry currently can only provide

33

a lower estimate of atmospheric CH4 emissions because not all leakages are identified and

34

quantitative data on release rates are rare. This is supported by growing evidence for increased

35

CH4 emissions in hydrocarbon production areas4-11 that are generally attributed to leakage of the

36

produced fossil fuel from several infrastructure parts during various operation steps4,11 and after

37

well abandonment12-15.

38

Conventionally, the petroleum industry considers the potential failure of well material (e.g.

39

casing steel, cement), typically identified by sustained casing pressure (SCP)16, that is expected to

40

lead to uncontrolled migration of reservoir gas to the surface installations (wellhead, pumps,

41

controllers etc.). Available data on such well integrity issues provides an uncertain estimate of 2-

42

75% of all wells2 being compromised and potentially at risk for leakage (Fig. 1). Additional

43

emissions of reservoir gas arise through the millions of abandoned wells10-15 and/or via gas ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 27

Page 3 of 27

Environmental Science & Technology

44

migration along the well paths which is known to occur due to certain soil/sediment conditions or

45

cementing issues in both active and abandoned sites. Both of these emission sources are not

46

addressed in conventional well integrity surveys, so that the number of leakages and their

47

emission rates are highly uncertain. In the Province of Alberta Canada, the only region where

48

testing for gas migration through the soil is obligatory17, 0.6-45% of wells showed soil gas

49

leakage18-19, but solely the discharge of reservoir fluids is targeted.

50

Here, we focus on the so far unconsidered migration of biogenic CH4 gas along the borehole

51

originating from shallow gas accumulations that are penetrated when drilling into the underlying

52

deep hydrocarbon reservoirs20. Drilling disturbs and fractures the sediment around the wellbore

53

mechanically, thereby creating highly permeable pathways for the buoyancy-driven migration of

54

the gas21. We present new and important data on the probability of shallow gas migration along

55

hydrocarbon wells in the North Sea, including the extensive analysis of an industrial 3-D seismic

56

data set that covers an area of ~ 2,000 m2, and provide the first estimates on its regional

57

relevance, including comprehensive modelling, literature review and GIS analysis. Based on this,

58

we reinvestigated the CH4 budget of the North Sea, indicating that shallow gas migration is likely

59

of regional significance.

60

Material and Methods

61

Data analysis in the Central North Sea (CNS). Evidence for shallow gas migration along

62

offshore hydrocarbon wells was first reported by Vielstädte et al.20 who investigated three leaky

63

abandoned wells (15/9-13, 16/4-2, and 16/7-2) located in water depth of 81-93 m in the CNS. For

64

the extrapolation analysis of CH4 leakage to the North Sea scale presented here, we used relevant

65

data on shallow gas migration that has been published in this earlier study20 including

66

geochemical data that characterized the origin of the emanating gases, leakage rates, initial gas

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

67

bubble size distributions (Tab. 1), and the analysis of industrial 3-D seismic data (ST98M3,

68

Statoil ASA) for shallow gas pockets in the area around the three wells by mapping high

69

amplitude anomalies22 in the upper 1,000 m of sediment using Petrel (Schlumberger). We

70

additionally analyzed CH4 oxidation rates in the water column at wells 15/9-13 and 16/7-2 (Tab.

71

1) and total organic carbon and sulfate concentrations in near surface sediments obtained during

72

cruise CE12010 (July-August 2012; Fig. S4). In addition, we estimated the leakage probability of

73

wells in an area of ~2,000 km2 in the Norwegian Sector of the CNS by identifying 18 out of 55

74

wells (i.e. 33%) that poke through shallow gas pockets in 3-D seismic data (ST98M3, Statoil

75

ASA). Assuming a binomial distribution from a Bernoulli process, a sample size of 55 wells,

76

investigated during seismic analysis, produces an uncertainty in the leakage frequency of wells of

77

6% (1-σ). A summary of relevant results published in an earlier study20 and additional

78

geochemical and seismic data are provided in the Supporting Information (SI Appendix, Section

79

2.1).

80

Extrapolation of CH4 leakage to the North Sea scale. CH4 leakage from wells into the North

81

Sea and the atmosphere, was calculated by applying results of a numerical bubble dissolution

82

model20 to the EMODnet North Sea bathymetry (available at http://www.emodnet-

83

bathymetry.eu) and combining publicly available data on drilled wells (see SI Appendix, Table S3

84

for details) using the geographical information system software ArcGIS 10.1. In total, 11,122

85

active and inactive wells were selected for the CH4 flux quantification excluding sidetracks of

86

wells (see SI Appendix, Table S4). The North Sea was subdivided into equal area polygons of 25

87

km2 using a Cylindric Equal Area projection and the seabed CH4 flow (QSF) was calculated for

88

each of these polygons multiplying the determined leakage probability of 33±6% for the wells,

89

the number of wells located inside each polygon, and the range of per-well CH4 leakage rates of

90

1-4 t yr-1 (sample range, N=2) observed in the CNS20. Note, we only consider the two lower gas ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 27

Page 5 of 27

Environmental Science & Technology

91

flows measured at wells 15/9-13 and 16/4-220 because they are believed to be more typical for

92

shallow gas migration than the larger gas flow measured at well 16/7-2, which has been drilled

93

through a seismic chimney20 (for details see discussion and SI Appendix, Section 2.1.1). For each

94

polygon, the resulting CH4 flow from the surface water into the atmosphere was then estimated

95

applying a transfer function describing the CH4 bubble transport efficiency to the sea surface and

96

to the SML of the North Sea as a function of the seabed CH4 flow and water depth (SI Appendix,

97

Section 2.2.2). All determined flow estimates and the effective uncertainty in the leakage

98

frequency of wells were added to calculate the potential range of total CH4 ebullition from the

99

seafloor and into the atmosphere. Reported values of CH4 leakage into the North Sea and the

100

atmosphere are expressed in kilo tonnes of CH4 per year (kt yr-1 of CH4), considering the

101

potential range of per-well leakage rates of 1-4 t yr-1 of CH4 (sample range, N=2)20 and an

102

uncertainty in the leakage frequency of 6% for the wells (N=55). Full methodology and a

103

discussion of associated uncertainties are provided in the Supporting Information.

104

Results and Discussion

105

In the North Sea, Pleistocene and Pliocene organic-rich sediments are the most prominent

106

stratigraphic units containing biogenic gas accumulations that are widespread in 300-750 m

107

sediment depth23-24. Vielstädte et al.20 identified these units as potential source areas for the CH4

108

emitted along three leaky, abandoned wells investigated in the Norwegian Sector of the CNS.

109

CH4 in the seep gas was isotopically light (δ13CCH4 < -70‰ VPDB) and contained only minor

110

amounts of higher hydrocarbons (C1/ΣC2+ > 1,000), clearly pointing towards a biogenic origin20

111

(Tab. 1, SI Appendix, Figure S2). The shallow origin is supported by bright spots (e.g. reverse

112

polarity high-amplitude seismic anomalies) and zones of chaotic signatures in the seismic data

113

surrounding the three well paths20 (Fig. 2b).

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

114

Here, we further hypothesize that leakage from existing wells in the North Sea is likely to

115

constitute an important part of the respective regional CH4 budget due to the large number of

116

wells (i.e. ~11,122, discounting extra sidetracked wellbores) and ubiquitous gas accumulations in

117

the shallow subsurface23,

118

assess CH4 leakage along wells into the North Sea and estimate the resulting emission into the

119

atmosphere. Tracking the subsurface well paths of 55 wells in an area of ~2,000 km2 in the

120

Norwegian Sector of the CNS, where shallow gas accumulations have been identified by bright

121

spots in industrial 3-D seismic data, we examine the likelihood of wells to leak shallow gas: 18

122

out of 55 wells in this area (about 33±6%) were drilled through shallow gas accumulations and

123

are thus believed to leak CH4 (Fig. 2). Individual leakage rates along three wells (15/9-13, 16/4-2,

124

and 16/7-2) in this area were highly variable, amounting to 1, 4, and 19 t yr-1 of CH4,

125

respectively20 (Tab. 1, SI Appendix, Table S1). These rates are in the upper range of gas emissions

126

measured from soils around wells in Alberta (i.e. ~0.03-16 t yr-1 of CH4)18. The highest release

127

rate in the North Sea was measured at well 16/7-2, which was drilled through a seismic chimney

128

(Fig. 2b), typically believed to be more permeable than the surrounding sediment20. Assuming

129

that the high gas flow at this well is representative for only a small fraction of leaky wells in the

130

North Sea and that the two lower rates of wells 15/9-13 and 16/4-220 are more typical for shallow

131

gas migration, we solely consider the two lower rates in our extrapolation analysis (i.e. sample

132

range, N=2). Given the small sample size of only three measured wells in the North Sea and the

133

unknown spatial and temporal variability of the ebullition (i.e. CH4 flow measurements at the

134

three wells covered only a few minutes)20, we emphasize that the uncertainties in our per-well

135

leakage rates are high.

136

Using publicly available wellbore data and extrapolating our results to the North Sea scale, we

137

estimate that shallow gas migration along wells may release around 3-17 kt of CH4 from the

25-26

(Fig. 2, SI Appendix, Table S4). In the following, we will thus,

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 27

Page 7 of 27

Environmental Science & Technology

138

North Sea seafloor per year, assuming that 33±6% of the 11,122 wells in the North Sea are

139

leaking. In comparison to other major sources of CH4 in the North Sea, i.e. rivers (0.5 kt yr-1)27-30,

140

the Wadden Sea area (1.1-2.1 kt yr-1)27, and known natural seep sites (0.2 kt yr-1)31-34, leaky wells

141

may constitute a significant input to the CH4 budget of the North Sea (Fig. 3 and SI Appendix,

142

Table S5). It should, however, be noted that also numerous additional natural gas seeps have been

143

observed at the seabed of the North Sea31, but their abundance and contribution to the CH4

144

budget are poorly constrained23,35. Despite the poor characterization of the North Sea CH4

145

sources, the patchiness and high spatial variability of CH4 super-saturation in the surface mixed

146

layer (SML) of the open North Sea with respect to atmospheric partial pressure, i.e. 103-

147

50,000%27,30,36, suggest that ubiquitous point sources at the seabed (wells and natural seeps)

148

dominate the regional CH4 budget. The high super-saturation of the North Sea surface waters

149

drives a diffusive CH4 loss to the atmosphere of 10 - 50 kt yr-1 30,36, which constitutes the major

150

sink in the marine CH4 budget (Fig. 3). An additional amount of 8 kt yr-1 is exported to the

151

Atlantic30.

152

To examine the extent to which emissions from leaky wells may contribute to the CH4 budget of

153

the North Sea, we apply a numerical bubble dissolution model to the North Sea scale. Each of the

154

three key fates of leaking CH4 is considered: 1) dissolution in the deep stratified layer (>50 m

155

water depth)37, 2) dissolution in the surface mixed layer (SML,