Simple Approach for the Rapid Detection of Alternariol in Pear Fruit by

Subscriber access provided by AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIV

Article

A simple approach for rapid detection of alternariol in pear fruit by SERS with pyridine modified silver nanoparticles Tingtiao Pan, Da-Wen Sun, Hongbin Pu, and qing-yi wei J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b05664 • Publication Date (Web): 14 Feb 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on February 19, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 28

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

A simple approach for rapid detection of alternariol in pear fruit by

2

SERS with pyridine modified silver nanoparticles

3

Ting-tiao Pan1,2,3, Da-Wen Sun1,2,3,4∗, Hongbin Pu1,2,3, Qingyi Wei1,2,3

4 5 6

1

School of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China 2

7

Academy of Contemporary Food Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou 510006, China

8 3

9

Engineering and Technological Research Centre of Guangdong Province on Intelligent Sensing and Process Control of Cold Chain Foods, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou 510006, China

10 4

11

Food Refrigeration and Computerized Food Technology (FRCFT), Agriculture and Food Science Centre, University College Dublin, National University of Ireland, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland

12 13 14

Abstract: A simple method based on surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) was developed for

15

rapid determination of alternariol (AOH) in pear fruit by using an easily prepared silver nanoparticles

16

(AgNPs) substrate. The AgNPs substrate was modified by pyridine to circumvent the weaker affinity

17

of AOH molecular on sliver surface and improve the sensitivity of detection. Quantitative analysis

18

was performed in AOH solutions at concentrations over a range of 3.16-316.0 µg/L, and the limit of

19

detection was 1.30 µg/L. The novel method was also applied to detect AOH residues in pear fruit

20

purchased from market and those were artificially inoculated with A. alternata. AOH was not found

21

in any of the fresh fruit, while it resided in the rotten and inoculated fruits. Finally, the SERS method

22

was cross validated against HPLC. It was revealed that SERS method have great potential utility in

23

rapid detection of AOH in pear fruit and other agricultural products.

24

Keywords: Mycotoxins, alternariol, pear, SERS, AgNPs ∗

Corresponding author. Tel: +353-1-7167342; Fax: +353-1-7167493.

E-mail address: [email protected]. Website: www.ucd.ie/refrig; www.ucd.ie/sun.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment


25 26

1. Introduction

27

Alternaria is a cosmopolitan fungal genus that includes saprophytic, endophytic and pathogenic

28

species. Many Alternaria species are plant pathogens that can damage crops in the field. Moreover,

29

they are capable of causing significant postharvest decay of fruits, vegetables, and cereals, resulting

30

in quality degradation of the infected products.1 Even worse, some Alternaria species can generate

31

diverse toxic secondary metabolites, known as Alternaria mycotoxins, contaminating agricultural

32

products during storage.2,3 The occurrence of Alternaria mycotoxins has been reported in fruits,

33

vegetables, cereals, and beverages.4-12

34

More than 30 Alternaria mycotoxins belonging to different structural groups have been isolated

35

from Alternaria species, among which, one of the dibenzopyrone derivatives, alternariol (AOH,

36

3,7,9-trihydroxy-1-methyl-6H-dibenzo(b,d)pyran-6-one) is considered to be the most important

37

mycotoxins produced in alternata infected pear fruit and other products.13-15 From a toxicological

38

point of view, Alternaria mycotoxins are associated with a variety of adverse health effects, and

39

AOH is genotoxic, carcinogenic, mutagenic, and cytotoxic in microbial and mammalian cell

40

systems.16-19 To date, no in vivo toxicology researches in experimental animals for Alternaria

41

mycotoxins have been carried out, however, some symptoms of precancerous changes in esophageal

42

mucosa of mice have been presented.20 Although the acute toxicity of Alternaria toxins is low in

43

animals, limited evidences are available for long term toxicity effects of them and their synergistic

44

effect with other toxins or contaminants.1,20 In addition, many researchers believe that the

45

incremental incidence of human esophageal cancer in China was related to the contamination of

46

Alternaria toxins, and A. alternata might be one of the etiological factors.17,21

47

The traditional methods reported in the literatures for AOH and other Alternaria mycotoxins

48

analysis include thin-layer chromatography,22 gas chromatography (GC),23 liquid chromatography

49

(LC),13,24,25 and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).11,14,26-34 Among them, HPLC is


Page 2 of 28

Page 3 of 28


50

the most commonly used method. Even though these chromatographic methods are specific, accurate,

51

they are laborious, time-consuming, and need skilled staff due to a series of complex clean-up and

52

pre-concentration steps are required prior to analysis. Besides, these methods are insufficiently

53

sensitive to detect nanogram amounts of Alternaria mycotoxins.

54

Recently, some emerging analytical techniques, such as stable isotope dilution assays (SIDAs),5-8

55

polymerase chain reaction (PCR),27,33,35 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA),26 and

56

molecularly imprinted polymer,36 offer alternative tools for the detection of Alternaria species in

57

agricultural products, and could be used as an indirect marker of the presence of toxins. These novel

58

techniques usually have the advantage of a high sensitivity, low limit of detection (LOD), and high

59

selectivity. However, they also require complex preparation steps prior to analysis. For example,

60

PCR method based on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) genetic marker needs a complex DNA

61

extraction and PCR amplification process before analysis.33 In using SIDAs for the determination of

62

alternata mycotoxins, the deuterated mycotoxins are first synthesized by palladium catalyzed

63

protium-deuterium exchange from the unlabeled toxins.6,7 While in ELISA, polyclonal or (and)

64

monoclonal antibodies need to be prepared in advance, which is a complex process that takes a long

65

time.26 In the process of molecularly imprinted polymer analysis, template selection and preparation

66

is a necessary step, but also an extremely complex step.36

67

Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) is a powerful analytical technique that provides

68

molecular-structural information of the target molecule adsorbed on the nanostructured metals. Due

69

to the surface plasmon resonance in the visible electromagnetic range, metal nanoparticles, such as

70

gold and silver, provide a considerable enhancement of the SERS signal from a molecule located in

71

the close vicinity of nanoparticles surface.37 Recent studies showed that SERS based on novel

72

nanoparticles substrates have increased in popularity as important tools in toxin detection.38-43

73

Therefore, it is our intention to develop a SERS method for the detection of Alternaria mycotoxins,

74

considering the advantages such as rapidness, high sensitivity and low cost that the technique can



75

offer.

76

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report dealing with the determination of AOH by

77

using SERS, and the aim of this study was thus to develop a simple and rapid SERS approach to

78

detect AOH in pear fruit. An important issue in the development of the SERS approach is the low

79

affinity of target molecules for metallic surfaces. Therefore, a new strategy, which could modify the

80

silver nanoparticles (AgNps) by pyridine, was developed to avoid above limitation and improve the

81

detection sensitivity in the current study. Finally, the proposed method was tested on the detection of

82

AOH. In addition, the occurrence of AOH in pear fruit was analyzed by HPLC method to validate

83

the feasibility of the SERS method to identify the samples contaminated with AOH.

84 85

2. Materials and methods

86

2.1. Chemicals and reagents

87

Silver nitrate (99.9%), trisodium citrate (dihydrate, 98%), pyridine, sodium nitrate, sodium

88

chloride, anhydrous sodium sulfate, acetonitrile, methanol, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate,

89

methanoic acid, and acetic acid were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Bio-Chem Technology Co.

90

Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Both acetonitrile and methanol are of HPLC grade and the other chemicals

91

are of analytical grade. AOH (>98.5%) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Shanghai, China).

92

Ultrapure water was prepared by a Milli-Q system (EMD Millipore Co., Billerica, MA, USA). The

93

pear fruit were collected from local retail shops in Guangzhou, China.

94 95

2.2. Silver nanoparticles synthesis and characterization

96

AgNPs were synthesized with slight modification based on the method available.44 Briefly, 90.0

97

mg of silver nitrate was dissolved in 500.0 mL of milli-Q water in a clean flask, the solution was

98

stirred and heated to boiling point in a constant temperature heating magnetic whisk (DF-101S,

99

Yuhua Instrument Co. Ltd., Yiwu, China). The solution was kept boiling and stirring, 5.0 mL solution


Page 4 of 28

Page 5 of 28


100

of trisodium citrate (1%, m/v) was quickly added to the boiling solution. The resulting solution was

101

continued to boil and stir for 1 h, and then cooled to 25oC.

102

A UV-1800 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan) was applied to measure the visible

103

adsorption spectra from 300 to 700 nm with a 1 nm interval. The newly synthesized AgNps were

104

diluted five times and detected. The transmission electron microscope (TEM) images were obtained

105

on a field-emission high-resolution JEM-1400Plus (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at an acceleration

106

voltage of 120 kV. The samples for TEM analysis were prepared by dropping the diluted solution of

107

freshly synthesized AgNPs on carbon film (T11023, Beijing Xinxing Braim Technology Co. Ltd,

108

Beijing, China) and air dried at 60 oC. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements were

109

performed using a two angle particle and molecular size analyzer (Zetasizer Nano ZS, Malvern

110

Instruments Ltd., Worcestershire, UK) at 25 °C under a scattering angle of 173° at λ = 633 nm.

111 112

2.3. Standard preparation for SERS

113

The AOH stock solution of 1.0×106 µg/L was prepared by diluting AOH standard with methanol

114

and kept in darkness at -20 oC. A working solution (1.0×105 µg/L) was prepared by diluting the AOH

115

stock solution with methanol. Standards for SERS detection were obtained by diluting working

116

solutions with milli-Q water. A series of standards with the concentrations of 3.16, 10.0, 31.6, 100.0,

117

and 316.0 µg/L were prepared.

118 119

2.4. Detection of AOH in standard solution by SERS

120

In order to provide a reference for the SERS spectra of AOH, 1.0 mL of 1.0×105 µg/L AOH

121

standard solution was loaded into a cuvette, and then scanned by a Raman microscope (LabRAM HR,

122

HORIBA Scientific, Longjumeau, France) with a 633 nm laser as the excitation source. The SERS

123

measurement was carried out within the wavelength range of 300-1800 cm-1. Two accumulations

124

were used, and the acquisition time was set to 30 s.



125

Prior to the SERS measurement, 80.0 µL of aqueous pyridine solution (0.1 M) was added to 400.0

126

µL of AgNps in the centrifuge tube and the mixed solution was stirred for 5 s, and then 400.0 µL of

127

standard solution was dropped into the tube and the solution in the tube was mixed for 5 s. Next step,

128

80.0 µL of sodium nitrate solution (1 M) was also added to the tube and mixed for 5 s to facilitate

129

AgNps aggregation. Finally, the mixed solution was analyzed after these preparations. For SERS

130

detection, the SERS spectrum was collected within the range of 300-1800 cm-1 using the Raman

131

microscope with a 532 nm laser source at 50 mW laser power for excitation. Two accumulations

132

were used, and the acquisition time was set to 30 s. Baseline correction and denoising were fulfilled

133

for all measurements. SERS measurement was repeated 3 times for each concentration. The intensity

134

value of the peak at 1252 cm-1 was plotted against the log concentration of AOH.

135 136

2.5. Spiked samples determination by SERS

137

The applicability and reliability of the proposed SERS method were evaluated by performing a

138

recovery test using blank pear fruit. The fruit purchased were confirmed to be negative for AOH by

139

China Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau (Guangzhou, China). AOH standard solution

140

was injected into the blank pear fruit and the spiked fruit were stored at room temperature for 2 h

141

before initiating the extraction process. The fortification levels in the recovery test were 20.0, 50.0,

142

and 100.0 µg/kg, and five replicates were performed for each level. AOH extraction procedure was

143

adapted based on previously published methods.26,32 Briefly, 5.0 g of sample was transferred into a

144

50-mL centrifuge tube, and then 4.0 g of sodium chloride, 10.0 mL of water and 15.0 mL of

145

acetonitrile (with 1% acetic acid) were added. The tube was first shaken in an oscillator for 10 min,

146

then was centrifuged for 5 min at 5000 rpm. The upper organic solvent was transferred into a flask,

147

while the underlying substance was re-extracted two times with the same solvent composition. All of

148

the upper organic solvent portions were pooled and evaporated (vacuum-rotary evaporation, 40 oC)

149

to nearly dry, then was concentrated to dryness using a nitrogen flow, and the residue was dissolved


Page 6 of 28

Page 7 of 28


150

in 1.0 mL of methanol, and this solution was diluted by 9.0 mL of milli-Q water, the diluted solution

151

was detected directly by SERS method as described above, without further purification. The recovery

152

(%) was calculated as measured concentration divided by fortification level.

153 154

2.6. SERS determination of AOH in real samples

155

The validated SERS method was then used for determination the presence of the AOH and

156

quantification its amount in the pear fruit. In total, 10 pear fruit (5 fresh fruit and 5 rotten fruit) were

157

analyzed. All the samples were stored at 4 oC prior to analysis. Moreover, AOH production

158

measurement was performed on the 10 pear fruit artificially inoculated with A. alternata at the

159

concentration of 1.0×106 cfu/mL, which were kept at room temperature for 2 and 8 days.45 The

160

extraction of AOH from the fruit samples was performed as per procedure described previously.

161 162

2.7. Comparative analysis by HPLC

163

2.7.1 Extraction and cleanup

164

The extraction of AOH from the fruits was performed following the same procedure described for

165

SERS analysis. The cleanup was conducted by using the extract solution by gravity onto an Oasis

166

HLB 3 cc (60 mg) extraction cartridge (Waters Co., Milford, MA, USA), and the cartridge was first

167

conditioned and equilibrated by 5.0 mL of methanol and milli-Q water, respectively, then washed

168

with 2.0 mL of methanol:water (1:4, v/v). 2.0 g of sodium sulfate was injected into a 3 mL/500 mg

169

Supelclean LC-NH2 SPE Tubes (Supelco Inc., Bellefonte, PA, USA). After that, the tubes were

170

conditioned with 5.0 mL of dichloromethane and the lower end of the HLB cartridge was connected

171

to the tubes, this series was then washed with 5.0 mL of dichloromethane. Finally, AOH was eluted

172

with 7.0 mL of 1% methanoic acid in methanol:ethyl acetate (1:1, v/v). The eluent was transferred

173

into a flask and evaporated (vacuum-rotary evaporation, 40 oC) to nearly dry, which was then

174

concentrated to dryness using a nitrogen flow, and the residue was reconstituted in 5.0 mL of



175

acetonitrile:water (2:3, v/v). The reconstituted solution was filtrated through 0.22 µm PTFE filters

176

(EMD Millipore Co., Bedford, MA, USA) and moved to the autosampler vials for the instrumental

177

analysis by an Acquity® ArcTM HPLC system (Waters Co., Milford, MA, USA).

178 179

2.7.2. Standard preparation

180

A stock solution of 1.0×106 µg/L was prepared by diluting AOH standard with methanol and kept

181

in darkness at -20 oC. A working solution (1.0×104 µg/L) was prepared by diluting the AOH stock

182

solution with methanol. AOH standard solutions for HPLC calibration and recovery test were

183

prepared by diluting the working solution with methanol. A series of standard solutions with the

184

concentrations of 10.0, 50.0, 100.0, 200.0, and 400.0 µg/L were prepared.

185 186

2.7.3 HPLC conditions

187

All analyses were conducted using the HPLC system equipped with a 2475 FLR detector (Waters

188

Co., Milford, MA, USA), which excites at wavelength of 339 nm and emits at wavelength of 404 nm.

189

ChromQuest software (Version 4.2, ThermoQuest Italia S.p.A., Milano, Italy) was used to manage

190

the HPLC data acquisition and processing. An XBridge® BEH-C18 (Waters Co., Milford, MA, USA)

191

column (100 × 2.1 mm, 2.5 µm) was used as chromatographic column. The mobile phase consisted

192

of two eluents (eluent A: water and eluent B: acetonitrile). A gradient program with a flow rate of

193

0.204 mL/min was used, starting with 85% A and 15% B, reaching 70% B after 8.82 min and then

194

maintained for 1.47 min. Afterward, the gradient was returned to 15% B in 0.3 min and allowed to

195

equilibrate for 4.41 min. The column temperature was set to 35 oC and the injection volume was set

196

to 10 µL. For quantitative analysis, an external calibration curve was used. AOH standard solutions

197

with the concentrations of 10.0, 50.0, 100.0, 200.0, and 400.0 µg/L were used for construction of

198

five-point calibration curves, and the peak areas versus concentrations were plotted.

199


Page 8 of 28

Page 9 of 28

200


2.7.4 Recovery test

201

Blank pear fruits, previously analyzed with negative result for the presence of AOH, were injected

202

with working solutions to reach 20.0, 50.0, and 200.0 µg/kg of AOH. Spiked pear fruit were prepared

203

and analyzed using the same procedure described for the pear fruit, i.e., extraction, cleanup and

204

HPLC analysis. Recovery tests were based on quintuplicate spiking and triplicate analysis. The fruit

205

samples detected by SERS previously were also analyzed by HPLC.

206 207

3. Results and discussion

208

3.1. Characterization of AgNPs

209

AgNPs are widely used as SERS substrate because they are easier to synthesize, in addition,

210

different batches of AgNPs are basically the same in shape, size, and size dispersion. As illustrated in

211

the UV-visible spectra of AgNPs (Fig. 1a), the wavenumber of maximum absorption peak was

212

414.6±0.9 nm and the full width at half-maximum was 116.1±0.1 nm, which suggesting that the

213

shape and size of AgNPs were similar from batch to batch. Besides, the UV-visible spectra were

214

overlapped, which indicated an excellent repeatability of AgNPs synthesis in various batches. DLS

215

analysis was performed to measure the diameter of AgNPs and the result is shown in Fig. 1b,

216

indicating that the average hydrodynamic diameter of the bare AgNPs was 48.9 nm, and the diameter

217

increased to 49.7 nm after pyridine modification (Fig. 1c). The TEM images of the bare AgNPs and

218

the modified AgNPs are shown in Fig. 1d, e and Fig. 1f. As shown in Fig. 1e, the diameters of bare

219

AgNPs range from 26.8 nm to 63.3 nm. Compared with the bare AgNPs (Fig. 1e), the modified

220

AgNPs had a silver core with a diameter of about 49 nm and about 2 nm thick shell (Fig. 1f) due to

221

that the multilayer pyridine molecules were tightly adsorbed on nanostructured surfaces of sliver. The

222

adsorption is favored by the heteroatom of nitrogen in the molecular structure.46,47 Pyridine is a

223

functional Raman reporter, its molecular structure contains nitrogen atom, which cannot only interact

224

with the AgNPs but can also conjugate with the AOH molecule, leading to the tight adsorption on the



225

surface of AgNPs and as many as possible number of the AOH molecules adsorbed on AgNPs.40,48

226

Therefore, the surface of AgNPs with a thin pyridine shell could circumvent the weak affinity of

227

AOH on metallic surfaces and to improve the sensitivity of detection. Moreover, due to that the shell

228

was thin enough, AOH molecules tightly adsorbed on the surface of AgNPs.

229 230

3.2. SERS activity of AOH on pyridine modified AgNPs

231

In order to confirm the SERS activity of pyridine modified AgNPs for the sensitive detection of

232

AOH, the SERS spectra of various solutions were given and compared. As shown in Fig. 2, the

233

SERS spectra of AOH added to the bare AgNPs (a) and to the modified AgNPs (b) without the

234

addition of sodium nitrate did not elicit distinctive SERS bands, and their intensities were extremely

235

low. Comparing Fig. 2b with Fig. 2c (the spectrum of the modified AgNPs), it can be seen that the

236

addition of AOH did not introduce a new Raman peak, that is to say, the modified AgNPs without the

237

addition of sodium nitrate cannot be used directly for the detection. The spectra of AOH added to the

238

bare and modified AgNPs with adding sodium nitrate were also collected (Fig. 2d, e). Sodium nitrate

239

was added to promote the AgNps close together, which could increase the signal of target.48

240

Although an apparent spectral change could not be discerned after the AgNPs was modified by

241

pyridine, some new peaks appeared, especially the ones at 1002 and 1033 cm-1 (in black dotted line),

242

these two peaks also appeared in the spectrum of pyridine solution (Fig. 2f). Thus, they are likely

243

assigned to pyridine ring breathing vibrational mode and in-plane deformation vibrational mode,

244

respectively.40 These two peaks showed different intensities in Fig. 2e and Fig. 2g (the spectrum of

245

the modified AgNPs with the addition of sodium nitrate), probably due to the different fluorescence

246

backgrounds of these two solutions, which have different effects on the spectra. As shown in Fig. 2d,

247

low SERS signal of AOH was obtained when detecting AOH with the bare AgNPs, while the

248

modified AgNPs exhibited very strong enhancement effect (Fig. 2e). The reasons may be attributed

249

to the weak affinity of AOH molecules on the surface of AgNPs. Compared to the Fig. 2g, the


Page 10 of 28

Page 11 of 28


250

spectra of pyridine modified AgNPs showed very strong characteristic bands about 1173, 1252, 1298,

251

1367, and 1615 cm-1 after the addition of AOH solution, which could be attributed to the vibration

252

modes of AOH molecules by comparison with the spectrum of AOH solution (Fig. 2h). The band at

253

1173 cm-1 is assigned to the β (C-H) ring.49 The intense peaks at 1298 cm-1 corresponds to the

254

stretching C-H vibration of benzene ring, while the band at 1252 cm-1 is assigned to the vibration of

255

O-H and C-H.43 The bands at 1486 cm-1 is assigned to the bending vibration of CH3, and it was

256

enhanced and displays clear peaks in comparison with the bands in the spectrum of AOH added to

257

the bare AgNPs with adding sodium nitrate.38,41 The bands at 1367 cm-1 is attributed to CH3

258

symmetric bending vibrations.38 The band at 1615 cm-1 is related to the ring stretching mode of

259

C-C.50 These results suggested that the sensitivity of determination was advanced through the

260

modification of the AgNps surface by using pyridine. The improvement of the efficiency of the

261

pyridine modified AgNPs to bind AOH is ascribed to the interaction of the aromatic rings of

262

adsorbed pyridine and AOH. Moreover, due to the formation of a covalent bond through the lone pair

263

of electrons of the nitrogen atom, pyridine interact strongly with metal.48 In addition, it is helpful for

264

the determination of phenols because the formation of hydrogen bonds between the nitrogen atoms

265

of pyridine and the hydroxyl functions contained in phenol.51,52 These above results indicated that the

266

characteristic fingerprint of band at 1252 cm-1 could be used to identify the presence of AOH using

267

the pyridine modified AgNPs substrate.

268 269

3.3. SERS detection of AOH standard solution

270

In this part, the LOD was confirmed by using a series of AOH standard solutions with various

271

concentrations. Fig. 3 shows the concentration-dependent SERS spectra of AOH standard solutions

272

ranging from 3.16 to 316.0 µg/L. As shown in Fig. 3a, the locations and the intensities of the

273

pyridine peaks (1002 cm-1 and 1033 cm-1) remain invariable, which meant that the addition of AOH

274

had no effect on pyridine adsorption and the pyridine was steadily adsorbed on the AgNPs, while the



Page 12 of 28

275

SERS signal intensities of the fingerprint Raman bands of AOH was increased with the increase in

276

the concentrations. This was because higher concentrations of AOH standard solutions caused

277

increase in the amount of the AOH molecules conjugated on the AgNPs. For obtaining the

278

quantitative relation of SERS signal intensities with the concentrations, a curve with the SERS

279

intensity at 1252 cm-1, which was one of the most intensive bands was plotted in Fig. 3b, and it was

280

observed that there existed a linear relationship between the intensity and the log concentration of

281

AOH solution in the range of 3.16-316.0 µg/L, which can be described as

282

I = 1453.7 log c - 553.4

(1)

283

where c is the concentration of AOH solution, I is the SERS intensity. The correlation coefficient (R2)

284

of Eq. (1) is 0.9926.

285 286

The limit of detection can be calculated by53 LOD = 3(σ / k)

(2)

287

where LOD is limit of detection, σ is the predicted error in the y-intercept and k is the slope of the

288

regression line based on Eq. (1), LOD could thus be calculated as 1.30 µg/L.

289 290

3.4. Linearity and LOD of HPLC analysis

291

The HPLC method with the 2475 FLR detector was able to measure AOH in less than 15 min,

292

with retention time of 8.7 min (Fig. 4a). The linearity was assessed under the chromatographic

293

conditions described by preparing calibration curve using standard solutions with concentrations of

294

10.0, 50.0, 100.0, 200.0 and 400.0 µg/L. Calibration curve was drawn by linear regression of the

295

least-squares method based on the plotting of peak areas at 8.7 min against concentrations (Fig. 4b).

296

As a result, satisfactory linearity was observed with R2 value as high at 0.9995. The LOD was

297

defined as three times the ratio of the standard deviation of the blank over the slope of the calibration

298

graph, and the LOD of HPLC method was 6.96 µg/L, which was much higher than that of the SERS

299

method.


Page 13 of 28


300 301

3.5. Detection of AOH in pear fruit

302

3.5.1 Recovery of AOH spiked in pear fruit

303

To confirm the feasibility of the proposed SERS method, pear fruits were used as a substrate to

304

perform recovery tests and the results are summarized in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, the recovery

305

ranged from 70.22% to 111.10%, and the average recovery of the three spiked levels were greater

306

than 84.05%. The accuracy as expressed as the relative standard deviation (RSD) was assessed using

307

five replicates with the same spiked samples (14.13%-18.46%). The results demonstrated that the

308

SERS method had a good potential for rapid detection of AOH in pear fruit. The results of recovery

309

experiments of HPLC method are also given in Table 1, showing the recoveries of 73.70%-90.00%,

310

the average recovery being higher than 74.70%, and the RSD ranging from 1.89% to 9.76%. These

311

excellent results confirmed that the traditional HPLC method would be useful for the detection of

312

AOH residues in pear fruit. Comparing the results of these two methods, it was easy to find that the

313

determined concentrations of AOH in the spiked samples by SERS method were close to their added

314

concentrations. However, by the HPLC method, the determined concentrations of AOH were much

315

lower than those of AOH added, this was probably due to the loss of AOH in the process of clean up.

316

However the RSD of the HPLC method was far less of that of the SERS method, indicating the

317

HPLC method was more accurate than the SERS method. The reason may be ascribed to that the

318

AOH extract usually contains various impurities, thus introducing difficulties in AOH detection by

319

the SERS method, due to the matrix effect.

320 321

3.5.2 Determination of AOH in real samples

322

To validate the availability of the SERS method for real samples, three kinds of pear fruit were

323

detected by the SERS method. All pear fruit were processed and detected by the procedure above,

324

and the results are presented in Table 2, clearly indicating that AOH was not found in any of the fresh



325

fruit, while the rotten fruit and inoculated fruit were positive. For further confirming the above

326

results, HPLC was performed and the results are also shown in Table 2. The comparison of these the

327

two methods showed the consistency, with the RSD of less than 10% between the two methods in

328

detecting the same samples.

329

It was found that the performance of the developed SERS method had some variation in detecting

330

AOH, which probably attributed to the variation in sample treatments and matrix effects. Although

331

the traditional HPLC method had better accuracy, the proposed SERS method still possessed good

332

accuracy with the advantages of high sensitivity, speed and low LOD, cost. SERS took less than 1

333

min to collect the spectra, while HPLC required several minutes for obtaining the results. In addition,

334

a series of complex purification processes were required before HPLC detection. Therefore, the

335

proposed SERS method is advantageous for detecting AOH residues with very low concentration,

336

especially it is suitable for trace detection.

337 338

4. Conclusions

339

A simple SERS method was developed in the current study for rapid detection of AOH in pear

340

fruit based on an accessible AgNPs substrate. AgNPs were modified with pyridine to circumvent the

341

weak affinity of AOH on metallic surface and to improve the sensitivity of detection. To the best of

342

our knowledge, the proposed SERS method has, for the first time, realized the detection of hazardous

343

Alternaria mycotoxins contaminated fruit sample. The SERS method performed satisfactorily with

344

the LOD of 1.30 µg/L in the detection range of 3.16 to 316.0 µg/L. In addition, the established SERS

345

method was successfully used to detect AOH in pear fruit and the results were cross validated against

346

the traditional HPLC method. Furthermore, the proposed method is rapid and results can be available

347

within the hour. Therefore, this SERS detection technique could be a valuable tool for rapid

348

detection of AOH in pear fruit and other agricultural products.

349


Page 14 of 28

Page 15 of 28

350


Acknowledgments

351

The authors are grateful to the National Key Technologies R&D Program (2015BAD19B03). This

352

research was also supported by the Collaborative Innovation Major Special Projects of Guangzhou

353

City (201604020007, 201604020057, 201508020097,), the International S&T Cooperation Program

354

of China (2015DFA71150) for its support, the Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Plan

355

Projects (2015A020209016, 2016A040403040), the Key Projects of Administration of Ocean and

356

Fisheries of Guangdong Province (A201401C04), the International and Hong Kong – Macau -

357

Taiwan Collaborative Innovation Platform of Guangdong Province on Intelligent Food Quality

358

Control and Process Technology & Equipment (2015KGJHZ001), the Guangdong Provincial R & D

359

Centre for the Modern Agricultural Industry on Non-destructive Detection and Intensive Processing

360

of Agricultural Products, the Common Technical Innovation Team of Guangdong Province on

361

Preservation and Logistics of Agricultural Products (2016LM2154) and the Innovation Centre of

362

Guangdong Province for Modern Agricultural Science and Technology on Intelligent Sensing and

363

Precision Control of Agricultural Product Qualities.

364 365

References

366

(1) Logrieco, A.; Moretti, A.; Solfrizzo, M. Alternaria toxins and plant diseases: an overview of origin, occurrence

367 368 369 370 371 372 373

and risks. World Mycotoxin J. 2009, 2, 129-140. (2) Andersen, B.; Frisvad, J. C. Natural occurrence of fungi and fungal metabolites in moldy tomatoes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 7507-7513. (3) Scott, P. M.; Zhao, W.; Feng, S.; Lau, B. P. Y. Alternaria toxins alternariol and alternariol monomethyl ether in grain foods in Canada. Mycotoxin Res. 2012, 28, 261-266. (4) Andersen, B.; Nielsen, K. F.; Pinto, V. F.; Patriarca, A. Characterization of Alternaria strains from Argentinean blueberry, tomato, walnut and wheat. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015, 196, 1-10.

374

(5) Asam, S.; Konitzer, K.; Rychlik, M. Precise determination of the Alternaria mycotoxins alternariol and

375

alternariol monomethyl ether in cereal, fruit and vegetable products using stable isotope dilution assays.



376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384

Mycotoxin Res. 2011, 27, 23-28. (6) Asam, S.; Konitzer, K.; Schieberle, P.; Rychlik, M. Stable isotope dilution assays of Alternariol and Alternariol Monomethyl Ether in Beverages. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 5152-5160. (7) Asam, S.; Liu, Y.; Konitzer, K.; Rychlik, M. Development of a stable isotope dilution assay for tenuazonic acid. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 2980-2987. (8) Asam, S.; Rychlik, M. Recent developments in stable isotope dilution assays in mycotoxin analysis with special regard to Alternaria toxins. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015, 407, 7563-7577. (9) da Motta, S.; Soares, L. M. V. Simultaneous determination of tenuazonic and cyclopiazonic acids in tomato products. Food Chem. 2000, 71, 111-116.

385

(10) Lopez-Maestresalas, A.; Keresztes, J. C.; Goodarzi, M.; Arazuri, S.; Jaren, C.; Saeys, W. Non-destructive

386

detection of blackspot in potatoes. by Vis-NIR and SWIR hyperspectral imaging. Food Control 2016, 70,

387

229-241.

388 389 390 391

(11) Patriarca, A.; Azcarate, M. P.; Terminiello, L.; Pinto, V. F. Mycotoxin production by Alternaria strains isolated from Argentinean wheat. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 119, 219-222. (12) Siegel, D.; Merkel, S.; Koch, M.; Nehls, I. Quantification of the Alternaria mycotoxin tenuazonic acid in beer. Food Chem. 2010, 120, 902-906.

392

(13) Lau, B. P. Y.; Scott, P. M.; Lewis, D. A.; Kanhere, S. R.; Cleroux, C.; Roscoe, V. A. Liquid

393

chromatography-mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry of the

394

Altemaria mycotoxins alternariol and alternariol monomethyl, ether in fruit juices and beverages. J.

395

Chromatogr. A. 2003, 998, 119-131.

396

(14) Myresiotis, C. K.; Testempasis, S.; Vryzas, Z.; Karaoglanidis, G. S.; Papadopoulou-Mourkidou, E.

397

Determination of mycotoxins in pomegranate fruit and juices using a QuEChERS-based method. Food

398

Chem. 2015, 182, 81-88.

399 400 401 402

(15) Raistrick, H.; Stickings, C. E.; Thomas, R. Studies in the biochemistry of microorganisms. 90. Alternariol and alternariol monomethyl ether, metabolic products of Alternaria tenuis. Biochem. J. 1953, 55, 421-433. (16) Brugger, E. M.; Wagner, J.; Schumacher, D. M.; Koch, K.; Podlech, J.; Metzler, M.; Lehmann, L. Mutagenicity of the mycotoxin alternariol in cultured mammalian cells. Toxicol. Lett. 2006, 164, 221-230.

403

(17) Dong, Z. G.; Liu, G. T.; Dong, Z. M.; Qian, Y. Z.; An, Y. H.; Miao, J. A.; Zhen, Y. Z. Induction of mutagenesis

404

and transformation by the extract of Alternaria alternata isolated from grains in Linxian, China.


Page 16 of 28

Page 17 of 28

405 406 407


Carcinogenesis 1987, 8, 989-991. (18) Lehmann, L.; Wagner, J.; Metzler, M. Estrogenic and clastogenic potential of the mycotoxin alternariol in cultured mammalian cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2006, 44, 398-408.

408

(19) Schrader, T. J.; Cherry, W.; Soper, K.; Langlois, I.; Vijay, H. M. Examination of Alternaria alternata

409

mutagenicity and effects of nitrosylation using the Ames Salmonella test. Teratogen. Carcin. Mut. 2011, 21,

410

261-274.

411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422

(20) Ostry, V. Alternaria mycotoxins: an overview of chemical characterization, producers, toxicity, analysis and occurrence in foodstuffs. World Mycotoxin J. 2008, 1, 175-188. (21) Liu, G. T.; Qian, Y. Z.; Zhang, P.; Dong, W. H.; Qi, Y. M.; Guo, H. T. Etiological role of Alternaria alternata in human esophageal cancer. Chinese Med. J. 1992, 105, 394-400. (22) Scott, P. M. Analysis of agricultural commodities and foods for Alternaria mycotoxins. J. Aoac Int. 2001, 84, 1809-1817. (23) Scott, P. M.; Weber, D.; Kanhere, S. R. Gas chromatography mass spectrometry of Alternaria mycotoxins. J. Chromatogr. A. 1997, 765, 255-263. (24) Azaiez, I.; Giusti, F.; Sagratini, G.; Manes, J.; Fernandez-Franzon, M. Multi-mycotoxins analysis in dried fruit by LC/MS/MS and a modified QuEChERS procedure. Food Anal. Method. 2014, 7, 935-945. (25) Prelle, A.; Spadaro, D.; Garibaldi, A.; Gullino, M. L. A new method for detection of five alternaria toxins in food matrices based on LC-APCI-MS. Food Chem. 2013, 140, 161-167.

423

(26) Ackermann, Y.; Curtui, V.; Dietrich, R.; Gross, M.; Latif, H.; Martlbauer, E.; Usleber, E. Widespread

424

occurrence of low levels of Alternariol in apple and tomato products, as determined by comparative

425

immunochemical assessment using monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59,

426

6360-6368.

427

(27) Andersen, B.; Smedsgaard, J.; Jorring, I.; Skouboe, P.; Pedersen, L. H. Real-time PCR quantification of the

428

AM-toxin gene and HPLC qualification of toxigenic metabolites from Alternaria species from apples. Int.

429

J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 111, 105-111.

430 431

(28) Delgado, T.; Gomez-Cordoves, C. Natural occurrence of alternariol and alternariol methyl ether in Spanish apple juice concentrates. J. Chromatogr. A. 1998, 815, 93-97.

432

(29) Delgado, T.; Gomez-Cordoves, C.; Scott, P. M. Determination of alternariol and alternariol methyl ether in

433

apple juice using solid-phase extraction and high performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A.



434

1996, 731, 109-114.

435

(30) Dzuman, Z.; Zachariasova, M.; Lacina, O.; Veprikova, Z.; Slavikova, P.; Hajslova, J. A rugged

436

high-throughput analytical approach for the determination and quantification of multiple mycotoxins in

437

complex feed. Talanta 2014, 121, 263-272.

438 439

(31) Koesukwiwat, U.; Sanguankaew, K.; Leepipatpiboon, N. Evaluation of a modified QuEChERS method for analysis of mycotoxins in rice. Food Chem. 2014, 153, 44-51.

440

(32) Magnani, R. F.; De Souza, G. D.; Rodrigues, E. Analysis of alternariol and alternariol monomethyl ether on

441

flavedo and albedo tissues of tangerines (Citrus reticulata) with symptoms of alternaria brown spot. J.

442

Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 4980-4986.

443

(33) Pavon, M. A.; Luna, A.; de la Cruz, S.; Gonzalez, I.; Martin, R.; Garcia, T. PCR-based assay for the detection

444

of Alternaria species and correlation with HPLC determination of altenuene, alternariol and alternariol

445

monomethyl ether production in tomato products. Food Control 2012, 25, 45-52.

446

(34) Vaclavik, L.; Zachariasova, M.; Hrbek, V.; Hajslova, J. Analysis of multiple mycotoxins in cereals under

447

ambient conditions using direct analysis in real time (DART) ionization coupled to high resolution mass

448

spectrometry. Talanta 2010, 82, 1950-1957.

449

(35) Pavon, M. A.; Gonzalez, I.; Rojas, M.; Pegels, N.; Martin, R.; Garcia, T. PCR detection of Alternaria spp. in

450

processed foods, based on the internal transcribed spacer genetic marker. J. Food Protect. 2011, 74,

451

240-247.

452

(36) Abou-Hany, R. A. G.; Urraca, J. L.; Descalzo, A. B.; Gomez-Arribas, L. N.; Moreno-Bondi, M. C.; Orellana, G.

453

Tailoring molecularly imprinted polymer beads for alternariol recognition and analysis by a screening with

454

mycotoxin surrogates. J. Chromatogr. A. 2015, 1425, 231-239.

455

(37) Gao, R.; Choi, N.; Chang, S. I.; Kang, S. H.; Song, J. M.; Cho, S. I.; Lim, D. W.; Choo, J. Highly sensitive

456

trace analysis of paraquat using a surface-enhanced Raman scattering microdroplet sensor. Anal. Chim.

457

Acta. 2010, 681, 87-91.

458 459

(38) Hassanain, W. A.; Izake, E. L.; Schmidt, M. S.; Ayoko, G. A. Gold nanomaterials for the selective capturing and SERS diagnosis of toxins in aqueous and biological fluids. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 91, 664-672.

460

(39) Li, A. K.; Tang, L. J.; Song, D.; Song, S. S.; Ma, W.; Xu, L. G.; Kuang, H.; Wu, X. L.; Liu, L. Q.; Chen, X.;

461

Xu, C. L. A SERS-active sensor based on heterogeneous gold nanostar core-silver nanoparticle satellite

462

assemblies for ultrasensitive detection of aflatoxinB1. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 1873-1878.


Page 18 of 28

Page 19 of 28


463

(40) Liu, J. Z.; Hu, Y. J.; Zhu, G. C.; Zhou, X. M.; Jia, L.; Zhang, T. Highly sensitive detection of zearalenone in

464

feed samples using competitive surface-enhanced Raman scattering immunoassay. J. Agric. Food Chem.

465

2014, 62, 8325-8332.

466

(41) Muller, C.; Glamuzina, B.; Pozniak, I.; Weber, K.; Cialla, D.; Popp, J.; Pinzaru, S. C. Amnesic shellfish

467

poisoning biotoxin detection in seawater using pure or amino-functionalized Ag nanoparticles and SERS.

468

Talanta 2014, 130, 108-115.

469

(42) Temur, E.; Zengin, A.; Boyaci, I. H.; Dudak, F. C.; Torul, H.; Tamer, U. Attomole sensitivity of staphylococcal

470

enterotoxin B detection using an aptamer-modified surface-enhanced Raman scattering probe. Anal. Chem.

471

2012, 84, 10600-10606.

472 473 474 475

(43) Yuan, J.; Sun, C. W.; Guo, X. Y.; Yang, T. X.; Wang, H.; Fu, S. Y.; Li, C. C.; Yang, H. F. A rapid Raman detection of deoxynivalenol in agricultural products. Food Chem. 2017, 221, 797-802. (44) Lee, P. C.; Meisel, D. Adsorption and surface-enhanced Raman of dyes on silver and gold sols. J. Phys. Chem.1982, 86, 3391-3395.

476

(45) Pan, T. T.; Pu, H. B.; Sun, D.-W. Insights into the changes in chemical compositions of the cell wall of pear

477

fruit infected by Alternaria alternata with confocal Raman microspectroscopy. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 2017,

478

132, 119-129.

479

(46) Hu, J. W.; Zhao, B.; Xu, W. Q.; Li, B. F.; Fan, Y. G. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy study on the

480

structure changes of 4-mercaptopyridine adsorbed on silver substrates and silver colloids. Spectrochim.

481

Acta A. 2002, 58, 2827-2834.

482

(47) Pagliai, M.; Bellucci, L.; Muniz-Miranda, M.; Cardini, G.; Schettino, V. A combined Raman, DFT and MD

483

study of the solvation dynamics and the adsorption process of pyridine in silver hydrosols. Phys. Chem.

484

Chem. Phys. 2006, 8, 171-178.

485 486

(48) Malynych, S.; Luzinov, I.; Chumanov, G. Poly(vinyl pyridine) as a universal surface modifier for immobilization of nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2002, 106, 1280-1285.

487

(49) Voiciuk, V.; Valincius, G.; Budvytyte, R.; Matijoska, A.; Matulaitiene, I.; Niaura, G. Surface-enhanced Raman

488

spectroscopy for detection of toxic amyloid β oligomers adsorbed on self-assembled monolayers.

489

Spectrochim. Acta A. 2012, 95, 526-532.

490

(50) Li, R. P.; Yang, G. H.; Yang, J. L.; Han, J. H.; Liu, J. H.; Huang, M. J. Determination of melamine in milk

491

using surface plasma effect of aggregated Au@SiO2 nanoparticles by SERS technique. Food Control. 2016,



492

68, 14-19.

493

(51) Chien, W. L.; Yang, C. M.; Chen, T. L.; Li, S. T.; Hong, J. L. Enhanced emission of a pyridine-based

494

luminogen by hydrogen-bonding to organic and polymeric phenols. Rsc Adv. 2013, 3, 6930-6938.

495

(52) De Bleye, C.; Dumont, E.; Hubert, C.; Sacre, P. Y.; Netchacovitch, L.; Chavez, P. F.; Hubert, P.; Ziemons, E. A

496

simple approach for ultrasensitive detection of bisphenols by multiplexed surface-enhanced Raman

497

scattering. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2015, 888, 118-125.

498 499

(53) Schmit, V. L.; Martoglio, R.; Carron, K. T. Lab-on-a-bubble surface enhanced Raman indirect immunoassay for Cholera. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 4233-4236.


Page 20 of 28

Page 21 of 28


Table 1. Detection of AOH spiked in pear fruit by SERS and HPLC

500

Methods

SERS

HPLC

Spiked concentration (µg/kg)

Detected concentration (µg/kg)

Recovery (%)

RSD (%)

20 50 100 20 50 200

16.81 42.61 89.49 14.94 42.10 171.25

71.30-94.00 70.80-100.36 70.22-111.10 73.70-75.70 78.38-90.00 81.01-89.24

14.13 16.28 18.46 1.89 9.76 4.13

501



502

Table 2. Comparison of AOH detection by SERS and HPLC in real samples

AOH content (µg/kg)

Fruit types (n=5)

503

Page 22 of 28

1

2

3

4

5

S

H

S

H

S

H

S

H

S

H

Fresh

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

2 days infected 8 days infected

8.31 8.62

ND 8.40

9.42 9.63

7.55 ND

9.31 11.12

7.69 10.68

6.08 9.40

ND 8.90

6.70 12.92

ND 11.24

Rotten

13.93

11.47

17.81

17.41

18.35

19.48

13.14

13.03

22.96

22.62

Note: ND represents not detected, S and H represent SERS method and HPLC method, respectively.


Page 23 of 28


504

Figure caption

505

Fig. 1. (a) The UV-visible spectra acquired from 300 to 700 nm for three different batches of AgNps. The average

506

maximum absorption value was 403 ± 1.8 nm and the FWHM was 74 ± 4.4 nm, (b) & (c) the average

507

hydrodynamic diameter of the bare AgNPs and the pyridine modified AgNPs detected by dynamic light

508

scattering, (d) & (e) the TEM images of the bare AgNPs at low and high magnification, and (f) the TEM

509

images of the pyridine modified AgNPs at high magnification.

510

Fig. 2. (a) & (b) Raman spectra of AOH added to the bare and pyridine modified AgNPs, (c) Raman spectrum of

511

the pyridine modified AgNPs, (d) & (e) Raman spectra of AOH added to the bare and pyridine modified

512

AgNPs with adding sodium nitrate, (f) Raman spectrum of pyridine solution, (g) Raman spectrum of the

513

pyridine modified AgNPs with adding sodium nitrate, and (h) Raman spectrum of AOH solution.

514

Fig. 3. AOH detection based on SERS with pyridine modified AgNPs (n=3). (a) SERS spectra of AOH standard

515

solutions with various concentrations ranging from 3.16 to 316.0 µg/L, and (b) calibration curve of SERS

516

peak intensities at 1251.88 cm-1 with the concentrations.

517 518

Fig. 4. (a) HPLC analysis of AOH standard solution; and (b) calibration curve of the peak area at 8.7 min with the concentrations.



519 520 521

Fig. 1. (a) The UV-visible spectra acquired from 300 to 700 nm for three different batches of AgNps. The average

522

maximum absorption value was 403 ± 1.8 nm and the FWHM was 74 ± 4.4 nm, (b) & (c) the average

523

hydrodynamic diameter of the bare AgNPs and the pyridine modified AgNPs detected by dynamic light scattering,

524

(d) & (e) the TEM images of the bare AgNPs at low and high magnification, and (f) the TEM images of the

525

pyridine modified AgNPs at high magnification.


Page 24 of 28

Page 25 of 28


526 527 528

Fig. 2. (a) & (b) Raman spectra of AOH added to the bare and pyridine modified AgNPs, (c) Raman spectrum of

529

the pyridine modified AgNPs, (d) & (e) Raman spectra of AOH added to the bare and pyridine modified AgNPs

530

with adding sodium nitrate, (f) Raman spectrum of pyridine solution, (g) Raman spectrum of the pyridine modified

531

AgNPs with adding sodium nitrate, and (h) Raman spectrum of AOH solution.



532 533 534 535

Fig. 3. AOH detection based on SERS with pyridine modified AgNPs (n=3). (a) SERS spectra of AOH standard

536

solutions with various concentrations ranging from 3.16 to 316.0 µg/L, and (b) calibration curve of SERS peak

537

intensities at 1251.88 cm-1 with the concentrations.


Page 26 of 28

Page 27 of 28


538 539 540 541

Fig. 4. (a) HPLC analysis of AOH standard solution; and (b) calibration curve of the peak area at 8.7 min with the

542

concentrations.



Graphic 146x113mm (220 x 220 DPI)


Page 28 of 28

Simple Approach for the Rapid Detection of Alternariol in Pear Fruit by

Recommend Documents