Simplified Modeling of Organic Contaminant Adsorption by Activated

Aug 15, 2017 - Cyclohexanol, phenol, benzoic acid, and phenanthrene fractional removal (italicized words are defined within the main text) by pulveriz...
0 downloads 12 Views 700KB Size
Subscriber access provided by UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE LIBRARIES

Article

Simplified modeling of organic contaminant adsorption by activated carbon and biochar in the presence of dissolved organic matter and other competing adsorbates Kyle Koyu Shimabuku, Julian M Paige, Marisol Luna Agüero, and R. Scott Summers Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b00758 • Publication Date (Web): 15 Aug 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on August 17, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 31

Environmental Science & Technology

1

Simplified modeling of organic contaminant adsorption by activated carbon

2

and biochar in the presence of dissolved organic matter and other competing

3

adsorbates

4

Kyle K. Shimabuku*, Julian M. Paige, Marisol Luna-Aguero, and R. Scott Summers

5 6 7

Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, 428 UCB, University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA * Corresponding author: [email protected]

8

Abstract

9

Cyclohexanol, phenol, benzoic acid, and phenanthrene fractional removal (italicized

10

words are defined within the main text) by pulverized granular activated carbon and biochar

11

adsorption in deionized water and stormwater was independent of target-adsorbate initial

12

concentrations (C0) when C0s were below concentration thresholds. This permits a simple-

13

modeling approach. C0-independent removal in deionized water at low-target-adsorbate

14

concentrations potentially suggests that DOM in the deionized water induce a competitive effect

15

that causes deviations from the Freundlich model. The Ideal Adsorbed Solution Theory-

16

Equivalent Background Compound model was used to determine the magnitude of concentration

17

thresholds and the competitive effect of stormwater DOM and possibly deionized water DOM.

18

These competing substances’ competitive effects were influenced by target-compound

19

adsorbability and structure. Concentration thresholds positively correlate with competing

20

substances’ competitive effect and negatively correlate with target-adsorbate-Freundlich 1/n

21

values. In deionized water, concentration thresholds increase as target-compound adsorbability

22

decreases. In stormwater, concentration thresholds do not correlate with adsorbability,

23

potentially because stormwater DOM is better suited to compete for aromatic-compound-

24

adsorption sites. The extent known-competitor adsorbates decrease target-adsorbate removal in

1 Environment ACS Paragon Plus

Environmental Science & Technology

25

the presence of DOM is investigated, which depends on the competing adsorbates’ relative

26

adsorbabilities and if they adsorb to a different subpopulation of adsorption sites.

27

Introduction

28

Organic contaminants (OCs) can have harmful human- and ecological-health effects and

29

can be challenging to remove from drinking-water sources, wastewater, and stormwater.1

30

Activated carbon is one of the best available technologies to remove many OCs, and biochar can

31

be a more sustainable, low-cost alternative.2-4 Due to the heterogeneity of activated carbon- and

32

biochar-adsorption sites, as well as the diverse physicochemical properties of OCs, commonly

33

used models in some instances cannot adequately model single-solute isotherms.5 For instance,

34

under single-solute conditions, adsorption data can deviate from the empirical Freundlich model

35

because isotherms can exhibit curvature whereas the Freundlich model falls on a straight line

36

when presented on a plot with log-scale coordinates for both axes.5 Also, when background

37

dissolved organic matter (DOM), which is ubiquitous in natural and anthropogenic waters, is

38

present, different solid-to-liquid-phase-concentration relationships arise depending on the

39

experimental approach, i.e., varying the adsorbent dose or target-adsorbate initial concentration

40

(C0).6 Moreover, DOM’s competitive effect, which is the extent to which it decreases target-

41

compound adsorption by competing for adsorption sites, can vary with different target

42

adsorbates, which further complicates adsorption modeling.7,8 By evaluating the adsorption of

43

compounds that have some similar attributes (e.g., in size) but differ in other properties (e.g., in

44

aromaticity), previous studies have isolated how compound properties influence OC-sorption

45

capacities.5,9 Such an approach could also be useful in studying other OC-sorption behaviors,

46

such as OC susceptibility to DOM competition. It has also been recognized that DOM can be

2 Environment ACS Paragon Plus

Page 2 of 31

Page 3 of 31

Environmental Science & Technology

47

present in deionized water, and that high target-adsorbate concentrations can limit competition

48

from DI-water DOM.10,11

49

The fractional removal of a target adsorbate (i.e., the initial concentration of the target

50

adsorbate minus the final concentration normalized by the initial concentration of the target

51

adsorbate) at a given dose is not influenced by the target adsorbate C0 if the competitive-DOM-

52

solid-phase concentration is significantly greater than target-adsorbate-solid-phase

53

concentration.10-14 (See the section “IAST-EBC model and simplification” for a mathematical

54

description of this phenomena.) C0-independent removal (i.e., when the fractional removal of a

55

target adsorbate at a given dose remains the same at different target-adsorbate C0s) occurs when

56

adsorption isotherms are linear (i.e., the Freundlich 1/n is equal to unity). Sander and Pignatello5

57

showed that hydrophobic-normalized isotherms describing the sum of benzene and toluene

58

sorption in a bi-solute system are highly nonlinear and are nearly identical to these compounds’

59

single-solute isotherms. When they plotted the isotherms of these compounds individually in a

60

bi-solute system, the isotherms approached linearity at high competitor concentrations, which

61

they suggested occurs as a result of presenting the adsorption of one solute individually, and not

62

the sum. They also noted that linear adsorption does not necessarily signify a change in the

63

sorption mechanism (e.g., from adsorption to absorption).5

64

C0-independent removal provides the basis for a simple modeling approach to predict OC

65

removal at different target-adsorbate C0s.10-14 However, there is a maximum C0 below which

66

fractional removal remains independent of the target-adsorbate C0, termed herein the

67

concentration threshold. The concentration threshold is exceeded when the target-adsorbate C0 is

68

great enough that it causes the target adsorbate to impact the competitive-DOM-solid-phase

69

concentration.10,14 If the concentration threshold is exceeded, a complex modeling approach is

3 Environment ACS Paragon Plus

Environmental Science & Technology

70

required to predict removal at different target-adsorbate C0s.10,14 Thus, there is a great practical

71

advantage when C0-independent removal occurs because equilibrium and kinetic modeling is

72

greatly simplified.10,14 Many studies assume C0-independent removal without validating that

73

target-adsorbate C0s are below concentration thresholds,15-20 and the influence of adsorbate type,

74

the DOM concentration, and adsorbent dose on the magnitude of concentration thresholds has

75

not been systematically investigated. Also, known-competitor compounds (i.e., compounds

76

whose identity is known, unlike DOM which is largely an unknown mixture of compounds) can

77

impact the removal of a target adsorbate,5 but at what concentration such compounds impact the

78

fractional removal of a target adsorbate in the presence of DOM has not been investigated.

79

The objectives of this study are to (i) evaluate how competing substances influence

80

isotherms in deionized water and stormwater, (ii) quantify the DOM-competitive effect with

81

different adsorbates, (iii) model the impact of adsorbate type, adsorbent dose, and DOM

82

concentration on the magnitude of the concentration threshold with biochar and pulverized

83

granular activated carbon (pGAC), and (iv) evaluate at what concentration known-competitor

84

compounds impact the fractional removal of a target adsorbate in the presence of DOM. The

85

approach was to adsorb cyclohexanol, phenol, benzoic acid, and phenanthrene with pGAC and

86

biochar in phosphate-buffered deionized water and stormwater with initial dissolved organic

87

carbon concentrations (DOC0) of 1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg/L. Adsorption data was collected by

88

varying the target-adsorbate C0 and adsorbent dose, and modeled using the Ideal Adsorbed

89

Solution Theory-Equivalent Background Compound model (IAST-EBC), which was originally

90

developed by Najm et al.21 The IAST-EBC model has been used to mathematically explain why

91

C0-independent removal arises.10,14 It has also been used to predict whether or not C0-

92

independent removal occurs using solid-phase concentrations and single-solute Freundlich 1/n

4 Environment ACS Paragon Plus

Page 4 of 31

Page 5 of 31

Environmental Science & Technology

93

values of target adsorbates and the EBC.10,14 The IAST-EBC was used here to determine the

94

magnitude of concentration thresholds and background-competing substances’ competitive

95

effect.

96

Materials and Methods

97

Target adsorbates. Cyclohexanol, phenanthrene, benzoic acid, and phenol were selected

98

as target adsorbates because they (i) have environmental relevance or share chemical structures

99

with compounds that have environmental relevance,22 (ii) exhibit a wide range of

100

hydrophobicities (see Supporting Information (SI) Table S1) while having an experimentally

101

accessible range of adsorbabilities (see the section “DOM competition” for a definition) in batch

102

tests, (iii) have limited volatilities that allow for open-air batch studies, and (iv) are structurally

103

different while also being roughly similar in size (except phenanthrene), which allows the

104

influence of different properties (e.g., aromaticity) on adsorption to be isolated. The SI discusses

105

reasons for adsorbate selection further.

106

phenanthrene were obtained from American Radiolabeled Chemicals, Inc. (St. Louis, MO) and

107

combined with respective unlabeled compounds [Sigmga Alrich, (St. Louis, MO)] to target

108

different specific activities between 20 and 0.0014 mCi/mmol. Detection limits ranged between

109

10 and 100,000 ng/L using a Packard Tri Carb 2300 liquid-scintillation analyzer (Downers

110

Grove, IL) with a 30-min counting time. C0s were targeted at 100 ng/L when adsorption data was

111

collected by varying the adsorbent dose. For data collected when the adsorbent dose was held

112

constant, target-adsorbate C0s were varied between 165 and 12,000,000 ng/L.

14

C cyclohexanol, 3H benzoic acid, 3H phenol, and 3H

113

Adsorbents. Biochar was produced by heating pelletized-pine-forestry waste (Black

114

Hills GOLD, Spearfish Pellet Company LLC, Spearfish, SD) at 850 °C for two hours in a

115

covered ceramic crucible under oxygen-limited conditions by filling the crucible to the top with

5 Environment ACS Paragon Plus

Environmental Science & Technology

116

pine-pellets to minimize headspace. The heating rate was 10°C/min. The biochar and a

117

bituminous-coal-based GAC (Norit 1240) (Atlanta, GA) were ground to pass a 325 U.S.

118

standard-mesh sieve. They were dried at least overnight at 105 °C prior to their use in batch

119

experiments. The pGAC- and biochar-BET surface areas are 1062 and 346 m2/g, respectively,

120

and their average pore widths are 42.9 and 39.4 Å, respectively. These properties were measured

121

with a Micrometrics Gemini VII Series Surface Area Analyzer (Norcross, GA). A few

122

experiments were also conducted with these adsorbents that underwent a cleaning procedure as

123

described in the SI.

124

Waters. Experiments were conducted in deionized water produced with a Sartorius

125

Arium® pro UV-system (DOC