Singlet Oxygen Production and Biological Activity ... - ACS Publications

Oct 9, 2017 - applications such as blue-light photodynamic therapy. However, their singlet ... PDT) is a widely used method to treat actinic keratosis...
9 downloads 0 Views 6MB Size
Article Cite This: Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 13491-13499

pubs.acs.org/IC

Singlet Oxygen Production and Biological Activity of Hexanuclear Chalcocyanide Rhenium Cluster Complexes [{Re6Q8}(CN)6]4− (Q = S, Se, Te)

Downloaded via UNIV OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA on July 4, 2018 at 19:59:24 (UTC). See https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines for options on how to legitimately share published articles.

Anastasiya O. Solovieva,†,‡ Kaplan Kirakci,§ Anton A. Ivanov,†,∥ Pavel Kubát,⊥ Tatiana N. Pozmogova,‡,# Svetlana M. Miroshnichenko,‡ Elena V. Vorontsova,∇ Anton V. Chechushkov,† Kristina E. Trifonova,& Maria S. Fufaeva,† Evgeniy I. Kretov,$ Yuri V. Mironov,∥,# Alexander F. Poveshchenko,‡ Kamil Lang,*,§ and Michael A. Shestopalov*,†,‡,∥,# †

Research Institute of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, 2 Timakova st., 630117 Novosibirsk, Russian Federation Research Institute of Clinical and Experimental Lymphology−Branch of the ICG SB RAS, 2 Timakova st., 630060 Novosibirsk, Russian Federation § Institute of Inorganic Chemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, v.v.i., Husinec-Ř ež 1001, 250 68 Ř ež, Czech Republic ∥ Nikolaev Institute of Inorganic Chemistry SB RAS, 3, Acad. Lavrentiev Ave., Novosibirsk 630090, Russian Federation ⊥ J. Heyrovský Institute of Physical Chemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, v.v.i., Dolejškova 3, 182 23 Praha 8, Czech Republic # Novosibirsk State University, 2 Pirogova Str., Novosibirsk 630090, Russian Federation ∇ The Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, 2/12 Timakova st., 630117 Novosibirsk, Russian Federation & The State Research Center of Virology and Biotechnology VECTOR, 630559 Koltsovo, Russian Federation $ Meshalkin Siberian Federal Biomedical Research Center, 15 Rechkunovskaya st., 630055 Novosibirsk, Russian Federation ‡

S Supporting Information *

ABSTRACT: Octahedral rhenium cluster complexes have recently emerged as relevant building blocks for the design of singlet oxygen photosensitizing materials toward biological applications such as blue-light photodynamic therapy. However, their singlet oxygen generation ability as well as biological properties have been studied only superficially. Herein we investigate in detail the singlet oxygen photogeneration, dark and photoinduced cytotoxicity, cellular uptake kinetics, cellular localization and in vitro photoinduced oxidative stress, and photodynamic cytotoxicity of the series of octahedral rhenium cluster complexes [{Re6Q8}(CN)6]4−, where Q = S, Se, Te. Our results demonstrate that the selenium-containing complex possesses optimal properties in terms of absorption and singlet oxygen productivity. These features coupled with the cellular internalization and low dark toxicity lead to the first photoinduced cytotoxic effect observed for a molecular [{M6Q8}L6] complex, making it a promising object for further study in terms of blue-light PDT.



INTRODUCTION

The octahedral metal cluster complexes with general formula [{M6Q8}L6]n−, (M = Mo, W, Q = Cl, Br, I; M = Re, Q = S, Se, Te; L = apical organic or inorganic ligand) have recently emerged as relevant photosensitizers for blue-light PDT. Such clusters exhibit bright red luminescence that is efficiently quenched by oxygen to generate O2(1Δg) under UV/blue light irradiation (up to 500 nm).2−13 As opposed to commonly used organic photosensitizers such as porphyrins which lose their sensitizing activity upon aggregation, mostly due to π−π stacking interactions,14 the Mo6 complexes remain good O2(1Δg) sensitizers even in the solid state.15−17 Moreover, these complexes constitute versatile theranostic tools thanks to additional features such as high radiopacity,

The research of novel photosensitizers for generation of singlet oxygen, O2(1Δg), has attracted broad interest in the last decades for health-related applications, mainly the treatment of diseased tissue by photodynamic therapy. Indeed, this highly cytotoxic form of oxygen is generated by the interaction of molecular oxygen with the triplet states of a photosensitizer excited by visible light. Such a feature, coupled with the limited lifetime of O2(1Δg) in water, allow for a high selectivity in the killing of pathologic cells, as only the close vicinity of the zone containing the irradiated photosensitizer will be affected. In dermatology and cosmetology, blue-light photodynamic therapy (blue-light PDT) is a widely used method to treat actinic keratosis, basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and acne using a photosensitizer activated by blue light.1 © 2017 American Chemical Society

Received: August 28, 2017 Published: October 9, 2017 13491

DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02212 Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 13491−13499

Article

Inorganic Chemistry

laser. Bimolecular quenching rate constants, kO2, were evaluated using the Stern−Volmer equation, i.e., 1/τT = 1/τT0 + kO2[O2], and oxygen solubility in air-saturated water (0.28 mM), where τT and τT0 are triplet state lifetimes at the specific oxygen concentration [O2] and under oxygen-free conditions, respectively. The kinetics of O2(1Δg) luminescence was recorded at 1270 nm at the right angle to 425 nm laser pulses (FL3002 dye laser, pulse width ∼28 ns) using a homemade Ge detector. Decay traces recorded at 1270 nm were averaged (1000−5000 traces) to improve the signal to noise ratio. The initial parts of the signals were omitted to eliminate light scattering and luminescence of cluster complexes. In addition, all measurements were carried out in oxygen-saturated D2O, where the luminescence lifetimes of cluster complexes are quite short ( K4-3 indicate that cluster complexes quench O2(1Δg) themselves and that the effectiveness of this process increases in the series K4-1 < K4-2 < K4-3. On the basis of these data, K4-3 exhibits the most effective self-quenching effect. Using data presented in Table 1, we can qualitatively analyze ΦΔ values in physiological fluids such as the cell cytoplasm, not accessible by the direct measurements. The quantum yield of O2(1Δg) formation is given by the equation ΦΔ = ΦTFTSΔ, where ΦT is the quantum yield of triplet state formation, FT is the fraction of the triplet states quenched by oxygen under experimental conditions, i.e, oxygen trapping efficiency, and SΔ is the efficiency of O2(1Δg) formation during oxygen quenching of triplet states, which is not affected in solvents of very similar polarity.37 Thus, efficient solvent-mediated deactivation of the triplet states (low FT values) in air-saturated H2O in comparison to D2O indicates that the title cluster complexes have lower ΦΔ values in cells in comparison to those measured in D2O. Cell Viability, Proliferation, and Cellular Uptake. Two of the main requirements for photosensitizers are low toxicity and high phototoxicity. Thus, the cytotoxicity of the cluster complexes on three different cell linesnamely the two cancer cell lines human larynx carcinoma (Hep-2) and human epithelioid cervix carcinoma (HeLa) and the normal cell line fetal lung fibroblasts (MRC-5)was evaluated using the MTT colorimetric assay (Figure 2). In order to eliminate toxic effects of K+ ions and in order to minimize cation effect on the radiopacity of the compounds in CT-scan experiments the sodium salts of the cluster complexes were used. The cells were incubated with Na4-1 and Na4-2 within a wide concentration range from 3.9 to 1000 μM. The results show some variations in the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) depending on the cell lines (Table 2). The reported IC50

Figure 2. Effects of Na4[{Re6Q8}(CN)6] (Q = S, Se) on the viability of Hep-2, HeLa, and MRC-5 cells (determined using the MTT assay). Data are presented as mean ± SEM.

values for Na4-3 on Hep-2 and MRC-5 cells30 are presented for comparison. According to the results, the cytotoxicity depends on the chalcogen atoms in the cluster compounds and 13494

DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02212 Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 13491−13499

Article

Inorganic Chemistry

dependent on the cluster core composition and increases in the order S < Se < Te. The study of the cellular internalization of the investigated cluster complexes was carried out using CLSM and TEM. According to CLSM imaging (Figure 4) of treated Hep-2 cells, we observed the red luminescence, and the Z-stack analysis (from 0 to 16 μm) (Figure S8 in the Supporting Information) revealed that this luminescence comes from inside the cells: namely, from the cell cytoplasm in a punctate manner. It should be noted that the luminescent intensity of the cells treated with Na4-2 is significantly higher than the intensity after the treatment with Na4-1 because of better uptake and higher brightness of emission of Na4-2 (Figure 4 and Figure S8). For a detailed definition of the subcellular localization within Hep-2 cells, the sample preparation for TEM images was carried out under conditions identical with those for the CLSM assay. TEM images of the cells incubated with Na4-2 show more contrast than the images of the cells incubated with Na4-1. This difference is in agreement with the better uptake of Na4-2 and with the fact that Na4-2 with heavier elements in the cluster core has higher electron density (Figures 5 and 6) and, as a consequence, higher electron beam attenuation. As shown in Figures 5 and 6, the mitochondria and heterochromatin of the cells treated with Na4-2 display significantly higher electron beam attenuation. The elemental analysis showed a homogeneous distribution of Na4-2 within these intracellular structures (Figure 5). These data indicate that Na4-2 has tropism to these structures. The cluster concentration in the nucleus is the highest near the nuclear membrane, suggesting the penetration of the cluster from the endoplasmic reticulum into the nuclear pores. Such localization

Table 2. Half-Maximal Inhibitory Concentration (IC50) of Cluster Complexes for Different Cell Linesa IC50, μM

a

cluster complex

Hep-2

HeLa

MRC-5

Na4-1 Na4-2 Na4-3b

417 ± 4 478 ± 8 721 ± 36

401 ± 7 410 ± 5

471 ± 13 551 ± 21 815 ± 41

Data are presented as mean ± SEM. bReference 30.

decreases in the series S > Se ≫ Te. Summing up, the cancer HeLa and Hep-2 cell lines appear less resistant to the cluster complexes than normal cells MRC-5. However, the differences are small and do not allow any discussion about selective toxicity between tumor and normal cells. In addition to the cytotoxicity evaluation, a quantitative analysis of the cellular uptake kinetic for Na4-1 and Na4-2 on Hep-2 cells was carried out using flow cytometry (FACS). Figure 3 displays the results as the proportion of luminescent events versus incubation time. The results document that the proportion of luminescent cells is negligible for Na4-1 after incubation for 15 min (5 ± 3%) whereas it reaches 30 ± 12% for Na4-2. After 30 min of incubation, the proportion of luminescent cells increased to 21 ± 9% (Na4-1) and 45 ± 10% (Na4-2). The maximum of accumulation was reached after 24 h and reached 61 ± 10 and 90 ± 10% for Na4-1 and Na4-2, respectively. Note that these parameters are 57 ± 7 (15 min), 79 ± 5 (30 min), and 97 ± 3% (24 h) for Na4-3.30 Thus, the analysis of cellular uptake kinetics for Hep-2 cells documents that the accumulation rate in cells is

Figure 3. Kinetics of Na4-1 and Na4-2 uptake by Hep-2 cells. Percentage of cells positive (top) and flow cytometry histogram (bottom) for Na4-1 and Na4-2 after 0.25, 0.5, 2, 8, and 24 h incubation. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean percentage of fluorescent positive cells. 13495

DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02212 Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 13491−13499

Article

Inorganic Chemistry

Figure 4. Laser confocal microscopy images of Hep-2 cells incubated with Na4-1 and Na4-2 for 24 h (magnification ×100, λex = 405 nm).

Na4-3 are approximately 1.4 and 2.3 times more radiopaque than the sulfur derivate, Na4-1, respectively. Photodynamic Treatment on Hep-2 Cells. Since the title hexarhenium cluster complexes produce O2(1Δg) and are internalized by the cells, the evaluation of the photoinduced cytotoxicity of sodium salts Na4-1, Na4-2 ,and Na4-3 on Hep-2 cells was performed. First, we quantified the level of intracellular oxidative stress induced by cluster complexes in Hep-2 cells after photoirradiation using cell-permeable 5,6carboxy-2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA). This fluorescence probe is sensitive to oxidation by ROS, including O2(1Δg). The cells incubated in free media and with H2O2, i.e., an irradiation-independent ROS, as negative and positive controls, respectively, were investigated. In the presence of H2O2, the fluorescence intensity of DCFH-DA indicates a high ROS level, whereas the ROS level in the cells incubated in the free media is negligible both before and after irradiation (Figure 7). The cells incubated with Na4-1 and Na4-2 demonstrated bright green fluorescence after irradiation that is a clear indication of the ROS photoproduction. Comparison of mean fluorescence intensities shows that Na4-2 generates an approximately 3 times higher ROS level than Na4-1, whereas the photoproduction of ROS by Na4-3 is within the level of negative control (Figure 7). Such a difference between Na4-1 and Na4-2 can be related to more effective light absorption in the visible region (Figure 1) and more efficient accumulation of Na4-2 in the cells (Figure 6). The negligible generation of ROS by Na4-3, while having by far the best absorption properties in Na4-2 can be related to more effective light absorption in the visible region, can be correlated with the lowest ΦΔ and the most effective self-quenching of O2(1Δg) from the series.

Figure 5. TEM images of Hep-2 cells incubated with Na4-1 (left) and Na4-2 (right): white arrows, mitochondria; red arrows, heterochromatin (nucleus) (magnification ×8000).

indicates that Na4-2 (and presumably Na4-1) accumulates in the area with highest protein density. The same localization was proved for Na4-330 and other hexarhenium clusters.9,38,39 Because these cluster complexes are attractive contrast agents thanks to the heavy cluster core and the low dark toxicity, we assessed the effect of the composition on the radiopacity, by performing CT and angiography studies of H2O solutions of Na4-1−Na4-3 (Figure S9 and Table S1 in the Supporting Information). Figure S10 in the Supporting Information demonstrates the dependence of radiopacity in the Hounsfield unit scale vs concentration. The graphs evidence that, for all of the clusters studied, the radiopacity has a linear dependence on the concentration. The slope of the plot is a characteristic of the molar radiopacity and can be used to compare X-ray attenuations of different compounds. Evidently, Na4-2 and 13496

DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02212 Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 13491−13499

Article

Inorganic Chemistry

Figure 6. TEM images of Hep-2 cells incubated with Na4-1 (A) and Na4-2 (B): asterisk, mitochondria; arrows, heterochromatin (nucleus) (magnification ×12000). Elemental analysis indicates the subcellular localization of Re atoms.

< 0.01). These are the first molecular complexes of the general formula [{M6Q8}L6]n− with photocytotoxic effects that make them promising for further study in terms of blue-light PDT.



CONCLUSIONS

In the context of blue-light PDT, we investigated the singlet oxygen production and biological activity of the hexarhenium cluster complexes [{Re6Q8}(CN)6]4−, where Q = S, Se, Te. Even when they have low luminescence quantum yields, the studied complexes exhibit singlet oxygen productivity comparable to that of commonly used photosensitizers (0.22 < ΦΔ < 0.59 in D2O). The complex with tellurium as inner ligands displays the most advantageous light absorption in the visible region; however, a low fraction of the triplet states quenched by oxygen leading to a lower ΦΔ value and efficient self-quenching of O2(1Δg) seem to be detrimental to the overall photosensitizing activity of this cluster complex. On the other hand, the complex with selenium inner ligands appears to have optimal properties in terms of absorption and O2(1Δg) productivity. These findings are reflected in the oxidative stress and photocytotoxic effects on Hep-2 cells, which are the most preeminent for the complex with selenium inner ligands, while the complex with sulfur showed a somewhat lower activity and the complex with tellurium did not provide any measurable effect. It worth noting that the last two complexes are unique among other M6 cluster-based molecular photosensitizers due to the phototoxic effect on tumor cells. These results make these complexes relevant objects for further studies on their use for blue-light PDT.

Figure 7. Detection and quantification of ROS levels induced by Na41, Na4-2, and Na4-3 on Hep-2 cells before (black columns) and after (blue columns) photoirradiation, respectively. Data represent the mean DCF fluorescence intensity ± SD.

Second, we evaluated the in vitro photodynamic toxicity of cluster complexes toward Hep-2 cells. Hep-2 cells were treated with Na4-1, Na4-2, and Na4-3 in the concentration range 12.5− 100 μM: i.e., using concentrations with negligible dark cellular toxicity (Figure 2). Both treated cells and untreated control cells were then irradiated with a 500 W halogen lamp (λ ≥400 nm) (Figure 8). According to our data, Na4-1 and Na4-2 are moderately phototoxic toward Hep-2 cells, whereas Na4-3 did not show any phototoxicity (Figure 8). Note that Na4-2 is more phototoxic than Na4-1. Thus, the cell viability after the treatment with 50 μM Na4-1 and irradiation was 87 ± 9% (94 ± 9.7% without irradiation, p ≥ 0.01), but Na4-2 reduced the cell viability up to 77 ± 6.3% (95 ± 7.5% without irradiation, p < 0.01). A much more significant effect can be achieved after the treatment with 100 μM Na4-2 (63 ± 1.5% vs. 90 ± 0.4% without irradiation, p 13497

DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02212 Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 13491−13499

Article

Inorganic Chemistry ORCID

Kaplan Kirakci: 0000-0002-1068-5133 Anton A. Ivanov: 0000-0003-2026-8568 Pavel Kubát: 0000-0002-7861-9212 Yuri V. Mironov: 0000-0002-8559-3313 Kamil Lang: 0000-0002-4151-8805 Michael A. Shestopalov: 0000-0001-9833-6060 Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (Grant Number 15-15-10006) and by the Czech Science Foundation (No. 16-15020S). Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.



ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work involved the use of equipment from the MultiAccess Center “Proteomics” of the Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics (Novosibirsk, Russia) and Multi-Access Center “Modern optical systems” of the Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine (Novosibirsk, Russia).



Figure 8. In vitro photodynamic toxicity of Na4-1−Na4-3.



ASSOCIATED CONTENT

S Supporting Information *

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02212. Luminescence decay curves, transient absorption decay curves, Stern−Volmer analysis of the triplet state quenching, Z-stacked image of Hep-2 cells incubated with Na4[{Re6Q8}(CN)6] (Q = S, Se) by confocal fluorescence microscopy, X-ray computed tomography and angiography images, and radiopacity of aqueous solutions (PDF)



REFERENCES

(1) van Straten, D.; Mashayekhi, V.; de Bruijn, H. S.; Oliveira, S.; Robinson, D. J. Oncologic photodynamic therapy: basic principles, current clinical status and future directions. Cancers 2017, 9 (2), 19. (2) Amela-Cortes, M.; Paofai, S.; Cordier, S.; Folliot, H.; Molard, Y. Tuned red NIR phosphorescence of polyurethane hybrid composites embedding metallic nanoclusters for oxygen sensing. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 8177−8180. (3) Cordier, S.; Molard, Y.; Brylev, K. A.; Mironov, Y. V.; Grasset, F.; Fabre, B.; Naumov, N. G. Advances in the engineering of near infrared emitting liquid crystals and copolymers, extended porous frameworks, theranostic tools and molecular junctions using tailored Re6 cluster building blocks. J. Cluster Sci. 2015, 26, 53−81. (4) Gao, L.; Peay, M. A.; Gray, T. G. Encapsulation of phosphineterminated rhenium(III) chalcogenide clusters in silica nanoparticles. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22 (23), 6240−6245. (5) Kirakci, K.; Fejfarová, K.; Kuče rák ová, M.; Lang, K. Hexamolybdenum cluster complexes with pyrene and anthracene carboxylates: ultrabright red emitters with the antenna effect. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 2014, 2331−2336. (6) Kirakci, K.; Kubát, P.; Langmaier, J.; Polívka, T.; Fuciman, M.; Fejfarová, K.; Lang, K. A comparative study of the redox and excited state properties of (nBu4N)2[Mo6X14] and (nBu4N)2[Mo6X8(CF3COO)6] (X = Cl, Br, or I). Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 7224−7232. (7) Kirakci, K.; Šícha, V.; Holub, J.; Kubát, P.; Lang, K. Luminescent hydrogel particles prepared by self-assembly of β-cyclodextrin polymer and octahedral molybdenum cluster complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53 (24), 13012−13018. (8) Riehl, L.; Ströbele, M.; Enseling, D.; Jüstel, T.; Meyer, H.-J. Molecular oxygen modulated luminescence of an octahedrohexamolybdenum iodide cluster having six apical thiocyanate ligands. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2016, 642 (5), 403−408. (9) Shestopalov, M. A.; Zubareva, K. E.; Khripko, O. P.; Khripko, Y. I.; Solovieva, A. O.; Kuratieva, N. V.; Mironov, Y. V.; Kitamura, N.; Fedorov, V. E.; Brylev, K. A. The first water-soluble hexarhenium cluster complexes with a heterocyclic ligand environment: synthesis, luminescence, and biological properties. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53 (17), 9006−9013. (10) Sokolov, M. N.; Mikhailov, M. A.; Brylev, K. A.; Virovets, A. V.; Vicent, C.; Kompankov, N. B.; Kitamura, N.; Fedin, V. P. Alkynyl complexes of high-valence clusters. Synthesis and luminescence properties of [Mo6I8(CCC(O)OMe)6]2−, the first complex with exclusively organometallic outer ligands in the family of octahedral {M6X8} clusters. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52 (21), 12477−12481.

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Corresponding Authors

*E-mail for K.L.: [email protected]. *E-mail for M.A.S.: [email protected]. 13498

DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02212 Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 13491−13499

Article

Inorganic Chemistry (11) Szczepura, L. F.; Cedeño, D. L.; Johnson, D. B.; McDonald, R.; Knott, S. A.; Jeans, K. M.; Durham, J. L. Substitution of the terminal chloride ligands of [Re6S8Cl6]4‑ with triethylphosphine: photophysical and electrochemical properties of a new series of [Re6S8]2+ based clusters. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 11386−11394. (12) Wilson, W. B.; Stark, K.; Johnson, D. B.; Ren, Y.; Ishida, H.; Cedeño, D. L.; Szczepura, L. F. Photophysical properties of a series of rhenium selenide cluster complexes containing nitrogen-donor ligands. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 2014, 2254−2261. (13) Aubert, T.; Cabello-Hurtado, F.; Esnault, M.-A.; Neaime, C.; Lebret-Chauvel, D.; Jeanne, S.; Pellen, P.; Roiland, C.; Le Polles, L.; Saito, N.; Kimoto, K.; Haneda, H.; Ohashi, N.; Grasset, F.; Cordier, S. Extended investigations on luminescent Cs2[Mo6Br14]@SiO2 nanoparticles: physico-structural characterizations and toxicity studies. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117 (39), 20154−20163. (14) Lang, K.; Mosinger, J.; Wagnerová, D. M. Photophysical properties of porphyrinoid sensitizers non-covalently bound to host molecules; models for photodynamic therapy. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2004, 248 (3−4), 321−350. (15) Solovieva, A. O.; Vorotnikov, Y. A.; Trifonova, K. E.; Efremova, O. A.; Krasilnikova, A. A.; Brylev, K. A.; Vorontsova, E. V.; Avrorov, P. A.; Shestopalova, L. V.; Poveshchenko, A. F.; Mironov, Y. V.; Shestopalov, M. A. Cellular internalisation, bioimaging and dark and photodynamic cytotoxicity of silica nanoparticles doped by {Mo6I8}4+ metal clusters. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4, 4839−4846. (16) Vorotnikov, Y. A.; Efremova, O. A.; Vorotnikova, N. A.; Brylev, K. A.; Edeleva, M. V.; Tsygankova, A. R.; Smolentsev, A. I.; Kitamura, N.; Mironov, Y. V.; Shestopalov, M. A. On the synthesis and characterisation of luminescent hybrid particles: Mo6 metal cluster complex/SiO2. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 43367−43375. (17) Kirakci, K.; Kubát, P.; Dušek, M.; Fejfarová, K.; Šícha, V.; Mosinger, J.; Lang, K. A highly luminescent hexanuclear molybdenum cluster − a promising candidate toward photoactive materials. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 2012, 3107−3111. (18) Evtushok, D. V.; Melnikov, A. R.; Vorotnikova, N. A.; Vorotnikov, Y. A.; Ryadun, A. A.; Kuratieva, N. V.; Kozyr, K. V.; Obedinskaya, N. R.; Kretov, E. I.; Novozhilov, I. N.; Mironov, Y. V.; Stass, D. V.; Efremova, O. A.; Shestopalov, M. A. Comparative study of optical properties and X-ray induced luminescence of octahedral molybdenum and tungsten cluster complexes. Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 11738−11747. (19) Kirakci, K.; Kubát, P.; Fejfarová, K.; Martinčík, J.; Nikl, M.; Lang, K. X-ray inducible luminescence and singlet oxygen sensitization by an octahedral molybdenum cluster compound: a new class of nanoscintillators. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55 (2), 803−809. (20) Elistratova, J. G.; Brylev, K. A.; Solovieva, A. O.; Pozmogova, T. N.; Mustafina, A. R.; Shestopalova, L. V.; Shestopalov, M. A.; Syakayev, V. V.; Karasik, A. A. Supporting effect of polyethylenimine on hexarhenium hydroxo cluster complex for cellular imaging applications. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2017, 340, 46−52. (21) Svezhentseva, E. V.; Solovieva, A. O.; Vorotnikov, Y. A.; Kurskaya, O. G.; Brylev, K. A.; Tsygankova, A. R.; Edeleva, M. V.; Gyrylova, S. N.; Kitamura, N.; Efremova, O. A.; Shestopalov, M. A.; Mironov, Y. V.; Shestopalov, A. M. Water-soluble hybrid materials based on {Mo6X8}4+ (X = Cl, Br, I) cluster complexes and sodium polystyrene sulfonate. New J. Chem. 2017, 41, 1670−1676. (22) Vorotnikova, N. A.; Efremova, O. A.; Tsygankova, A. R.; Brylev, K. A.; Edeleva, M. V.; Kurskaya, O. G.; Sutherland, A. J.; Shestopalov, A. M.; Mironov, Y. V.; Shestopalov, M. A. Characterization and cytotoxicity studies of thiol-modified polystyrene microbeads doped with [{Mo6X8}(NO3)6]2− (X = Cl, Br, I). Polym. Adv. Technol. 2016, 27, 922−928. (23) Beltrán, A.; Mikhailov, M.; Sokolov, M. N.; Pérez-Laguna, V.; Rezusta, A.; José Revillo, M.; Galindo, F. A photobleaching resistant polymer supported hexanuclear molybdenum iodide cluster for photocatalytic oxygenations and photodynamic inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4, 5975−5979. (24) Cheplakova, A. M.; Solovieva, A. O.; Pozmogova, T. N.; Vorotnikov, Y. A.; Brylev, K. A.; Vorotnikova, N. A.; Vorontsova, E. V.;

Mironov, Y. V.; Poveshchenko, A. F.; Kovalenko, K. A.; Shestopalov, M. A. Nanosized mesoporous metal−organic framework MIL-101 as a nanocarrier for photoactive hexamolybdenum cluster compounds. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2017, 166, 100−107. (25) Krasilnikova, A. A.; Solovieva, A. O.; Ivanov, A. A.; Brylev, K. A.; Pozmogova, T. N.; Gulyaeva, M. A.; Kurskaya, O. G.; Alekseev, A. Y.; Shestopalov, A. M.; Shestopalova, L. V.; Poveshchenko, A. F.; Efremova, O. A.; Mironov, Y. V.; Shestopalov, M. A. A comparative study of hydrophilic phosphine hexanuclear rhenium cluster complexes’ toxicity. Toxicol. Res. 2017, 6, 554−560. (26) Kirakci, K.; Kubát, P.; Kučeráková, M.; Šícha, V.; Gbelcová, H.; Lovecká, P.; Grznárová, P.; Ruml, T.; Lang, K. Water-soluble octahedral molybdenum cluster compounds Na2[Mo6I8(N3)6] and Na2[Mo6I8(NCS)6]: Syntheses, luminescence, and in vitro studies. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2016, 441, 42−49. (27) Imoto, H.; Naumov, N. G.; Virovets, A. V.; Saito, T.; Fedorov, V. E. Primitive cubic packing of anions in Cs4[Re6Te8(CN)6]•2H2O and Ba2[Re6Te8(CN)6]•12H2O srystals. J. Struct. Chem. 1998, 39 (5), 720−727. (28) Naumov, N. G.; Virovets, A. V.; Mironov, Y. V.; Artemkina, S. B.; Fedorov, V. E. Synthesis and crystal structure of new layered cluster cyanides Cs2M[Re6S8(CN)6]•2H2O (M = Mn2+, Fe2+, Co2+, Cd2+): size control over framework dimension. Ukr. Khim. Zh. 1999, 65, 21− 27. (29) Naumov, N. G.; Virovets, A. V.; Podberezskaya, N. V.; Federov, V. E. Synthesis and crystal structure of K4[Re6Se8(CN)6]•3.5H2O. J. Struct. Chem. 1997, 38 (5), 857−862. (30) Krasilnikova, A. A.; Solovieva, A. O.; Ivanov, A. A.; Trifonova, K. E.; Pozmogova, T. N.; Tsygankova, A. R.; Smolentsev, A. I.; Kretov, E. I.; Sergeevichev, D. S.; Shestopalov, M. A.; Mironov, Y. V.; Shestopalov, A. M.; Poveshchenko, A. F.; Shestopalova, L. V. Comprehensive study of hexarhenium cluster complex Na4[{Re6Te8}(CN)6] − in terms of a new promising luminescent and X-ray contrast agent. Nanomedicine 2017, 13 (2), 755−763. (31) Wilkinson, F.; Helman, W. P.; Ross, A. B. Quantum yields for the photosensitized formation of the lowest electronically excited singlet-state of molecular oxygen in solution. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1993, 22, 113−262. (32) Brydson, R. Electron energy loss spectroscopy; BIOS: Oxford, U.K., 2001; Vol. 48. (33) Lee, Y.-J.; Shacter, E. Bcl-2 does not protect Burkitt’s lymphoma cells from oxidant-induced cell death. Blood 1997, 89, 4480−4492. (34) Efremova, O. A.; Vorotnikov, Y. A.; Brylev, K. A.; Vorotnikova, N. A.; Novozhilov, I. N.; Kuratieva, N. V.; Edeleva, M. V.; Benoit, D. M.; Kitamura, N.; Mironov, Y. V.; Shestopalov, M. A.; Sutherland, A. J. Octahedral molybdenum cluster complexes with aromatic sulfonate ligands. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 15427−15435. (35) Yoshimura, T.; Ishizaka, S.; Sasaki, Y.; Kim, H.-B.; Kitamura, N.; Naumov, N. G.; Sokolov, M. N.; Federov, V. E. Unusual capping chalcogenide dependence of the luminescence quantum yield of the hexarhenium(III) cyano complexes [Re6(μ3-E)8(CN)6]4−, E2− = Se2− > S2− > Te2−. Chem. Lett. 1999, 28 (10), 1121−1122. (36) Bregnhoj, M.; Westberg, M.; Jensen, F.; Ogilby, P. R. Solventdependent singlet oxygen lifetimes: temperature effects implicate tunneling and charge-transfer interactions. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 22946−22961. (37) Schweitzer, C.; Schmidt, R. Physical mechanisms of generation and deactivation of singlet oxygen. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103 (5), 1685− 1758. (38) Choi, S.-J.; Brylev, K. A.; Xu, J.-Z.; Mironov, Y. V.; Fedorov, V. E.; Sohn, Y. S.; Kim, S.-J.; Choy, J.-H. Cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of octahedral rhenium cluster complexes. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2008, 102 (11), 1991−1996. (39) Echeverría, C.; Becerra, A.; Nuñez-Villena, F.; Muñoz-Castro, A.; Stehberg, J.; Zheng, Z.; Arratia-Perez, R.; Simon, F.; Ramírez-Tagle, R. The paramagnetic and luminescent [Re6Se8I6]3‑ cluster. Its potential use as an antitumoral and biomarker agent. New J. Chem. 2012, 36, 927−932.

13499

DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02212 Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 13491−13499