Source and Biological Response of Biochar Organic Compounds

Apr 24, 2017 - Fraunhofer Institute for Environmental, Safety, and Energy Technology UMSICHT, Institute Branch Sulzbach-Rosenberg, An der Maxhütte 1,...
0 downloads 0 Views 954KB Size
Subscriber access provided by University of Colorado Boulder

Article

Source and biological response of biochar organic compounds released into water. Relationships with bio-oil composition and carbonization degree Michele Ghidotti, Daniele Fabbri, Ond#ej Mašek, Colin Logan Mackay, Marco Montalti, and Andreas Hornung Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • Publication Date (Web): 24 Apr 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on April 26, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 32

Environmental Science & Technology

1

Source and biological response of biochar organic

2

compounds released into water. Relationships with

3

bio-oil composition and carbonization degree

4

Michele Ghidotti,*,†, ¶ Daniele Fabbri,†, ¶ Ondřej Mašek,‡ Colin Logan Mackay,§ Marco

5

Montalti,¶ Andreas Hornung,⊥

6



7

Chemistry “Giacomo Ciamician”, University of Bologna, via S. Alberto 163, I-48123 Ravenna,

8

Italy, [email protected], +39 0544 937388; ‡ UK Biochar Research Centre, School of

9

GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Crew Building, Alexander Crum Brown Road,

10

Edinburgh, United Kingdom; § SIRCAMS, School of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh,

11

Joseph Black Building, King's Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, United Kingdom;

12



13

⊥Fraunhofer

14

Branch Sulzbach-Rosenberg, An der Maxhütte 1, 92237 Sulzbach-Rosenberg, Germany

15

ABSTRACT

16

Water-soluble organic compounds (WSOCs) were extracted from corn stalk biochar produced at

17

increasing pyrolysis temperatures (350-650°C) and from the corresponding vapors, collected as

18

bio-oil. WSOCs were characterized by gas chromatography (semi-volatile fraction), negative

Interdepartmental Centre for Industrial Research “Energy and Environment” and Department of

Department of Chemistry “G. Ciamician”, University of Bologna, Via Selmi 2, Bologna, Italy; Institute for Environmental, Safety, and Energy Technology UMSICHT, Institute

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

1

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 2 of 32

19

electron spray ionization high resolution mass spectrometry (hydrophilic fraction) and

20

fluorescence spectroscopy. The pattern of semi-volatile WSOCs in bio-oil was dominated by

21

aromatic products from lignocellulose, while in biochar was featured by saturated carboxylic

22

acids from hemi/cellulose and lipids with concentrations decreased with decreasing H/C ratios.

23

Hydrophilic species in poorly carbonized biochar resembled those in bio-oil, but the increasing

24

charring intensity caused a marked reduction in the molecular complexity and degree of

25

aromaticity. Differences in the fluorescence spectra were attributed to the predominance of fulvic

26

acid-like structures in biochar and lignin-like moieties in bio-oil. The divergence between

27

pyrolysis vapors and biochar in the distribution of WSOCs with increasing carbonization was

28

explained by the hydrophobic carbonaceous matrix acting like a filter favoring the release into

29

water of carboxylic and fulvic acid-like components. The formation of these structures was

30

confirmed in biochar produced by pilot plant pyrolysis units. Biochar affected differently shoot

31

and root length of cress seedlings in germination tests highlighting its complex role on plant

32

growth.

33

INTRODUCTION

34

Biochar (BC) research has made consistent progress since it was proposed as a sustainable

35

strategy for the abatement of greenhouse gases in terrestrial ecosystems.1 However, the

36

ameliorating effect of BC in soil applications is highly dependent on its physical and chemical

37

properties, in turn affected by production technology and biomass feedstocks. The definition of

38

BC quality is therefore fundamental, and different criteria were proposed for its classification,

39

like carbon content, aromaticity, and the presence of harmful chemical species such as heavy

40

metals or polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).2 Apart from priority contaminants, the role of BC

41

mobile organic compounds is being evaluated as potentially affecting its performance in soil.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

2

Page 3 of 32

Environmental Science & Technology

42

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and water soluble organic compounds (WSOCs) were

43

deemed responsible for the positive3 and negative4,5 effects on plants, microorganisms6 and

44

aquatic organisms7,8. BC labile carbon structures could also affect the composition of soil

45

derived dissolved organic matter, in turn influencing soil ecosystem processes. The presence of

46

organic species leached from BC was confirmed in soil application. Riedel et al.9 evidenced a

47

compositional change in the molecular fingerprint of the organic matter released from a soil

48

mixed with BC compared to untreated soil in column experiments. The amendment caused a

49

marked reduction of the organic matter mobilization from the soil, but a net increase in the

50

intensities of black carbon-type and lignin-type compounds was observed. Uchimiya et al.10

51

demonstrated the existence of polyaromatic moieties in the dissolved organic carbon (DOC)

52

extracted from a BC-amended soil, attributed to unique structures of pyrogenic DOC. Vapors re-

53

condensation and pyrolysis temperature were found to be of primary importance for the

54

production of BC suitable for soil application5,8,11. The contact of the pyrolysis vapors with the

55

carbonized biomass inside the reactor and their removal is critical to prevent BC

56

contamination5,8. Temperature and residence time are crucial process parameters. At

57

temperatures higher than 400°C a sharp decrease in VOCs adsorbed on BC was evidenced8,11.

58

High nitrogen flow can reduce the content of PAHs12,13. The effect of process conditions on the

59

composition of WSOCs has not been widely investigated, nonetheless WSOCs may play an

60

important role in BC environmental impact due to their mobility in water. WSOCs were

61

investigated by means of two dimensional GC8 and liquid chromatography3,14,15, while ultrahigh

62

resolution mass spectrometry (Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry

63

FT-ICR-MS) revealed the presence of thousands hydrophilic species, non-detectable with other

64

techniques 8,9,16. Fluorescence spectroscopy with Parallel Factor Analysis (PARAFAC) was used

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

3

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 4 of 32

65

as rapid and sensitive technique to investigate its aromatic fraction10,17–19. These studies have

66

noticeably increased our understanding on the chemical composition of BC WSOCs, however,

67

the relationship with production parameters and especially with the composition of the pyrolysis

68

vapors are poorly known. The present study was primary focused on the comprehensive

69

characterization of BC WSOCs with spectroscopic, chromatographic and mass spectrometry

70

techniques in relation to the composition of the water-soluble fraction of the pyrolysis vapors,

71

condensed (bio-oils) during the pyrolyses for BC production. The linkage between WSOC

72

patterns, BC bulk properties and their implications on seeds germination, could eventually shed

73

light on the role of BC mobile organic compounds in the determination of its quality for

74

environmental applications, possibly leading to the proposal of threshold levels.

75

MATERIALS AND METHODS

76

Samples

77

BC were produced from pelletized corn stalks at 350, 400, 450, 500, 550, 600, 650°C and

78

characterized in a previous study.11 The vapors carried by the nitrogen flow at the outlet of the

79

reactor presented temperatures ranging from 195°C (pyrolysis at 350°) to 310°C (pyrolysis at

80

650°C), measured with a thermocouple. These values were considered sufficiently high to

81

minimize vapors re-condensation in the part of the reactor where the biochar was synthesized.

82

Vapors leaving the reactor were condensed in two ice/salt cold traps at -14°C to collect the

83

pyrolysis liquids. The content of the two traps was merged to produce one bio-oil (OL) sample

84

per temperature. In this study, the samples produced at the temperature XXX °C are named

85

BCXXX and OLXXX.

86

Lipid extraction from corn stalk biomass

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

4

Page 5 of 32

Environmental Science & Technology

87

The total lipid fraction of the corn stalk biomass used in the pyrolysis experiments was

88

determined by sequentially extracting the feedstock with CHCl3-MeOH 2:1 (v/v) at 50°C for 1.5

89

hours (triplicate analysis). The profile of fatty acids was determined by GC-MS after

90

methanolysis followed by the production of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME)20.

91

Extraction of biochar WSOCs

92

An amount of BC was weighed (1 g ± 0.01 mg) into 20 ml vials and 10 ml of deionized water

93

(DW, HPLC grade) was added. The vials were sealed with aluminum crimp seals with

94

PTFE/rubber septa. The sealed vials were then placed on a mechanical shaker (IKA KS 260)

95

covered with an aluminum foil, and left shaking at 150 rpm for 72 hours at ambient temperature.

96

The resulting solutions were centrifuged at 3800 rpm for 10 min (ALC4232 centrifuge) to

97

separate the solid material and filtered with PTFE syringe filters 0.45µm (Sartorius Minisart

98

SRP) thereafter.

99

Analysis of BC WSOCs by direct immersion (DI)-SPME-GC-MS

100

Each BC extract (1ml) was added with 0.5 ml of 2M phosphate buffer (KH2PO4/Na2HPO4) at pH

101

5.7 in 1.5 ml vials. Carboxen-PDMS (Car-PDMS) SPME fiber was exposed to the solution under

102

magnetic stirring for 30 minutes.4 The thermal desorption of the analytes and GC-MS analysis

103

were performed with the method developed in a previous study11. The amounts of WSOCs were

104

expressed as peak area counts normalized by the sample weight (NA). Blank analyses of

105

phosphate buffer and DW were performed to check procedural contaminations. A calibration

106

curve of volatile fatty acids (VFA) was performed with a standard VFA solution (0.1% Sigma-

107

Aldrich) containing acetic acid, propanoic acid, methyl propanoic acid, butanoic acid, 3-methyl

108

butanoic acid and pentanoic acid in DW. Serial dilutions were prepared at 10, 5, 1 and 0.1 mg/l

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

5

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 6 of 32

109

in phosphate buffer, spiked with 2-ethyl butyric acid 5mg/l in DW (internal standard) and

110

analyzed in triplicate. The concentration of each VFA was calculated using the response factors

111

from the calibration curve and expressed as (µg/gBC).

112

Analysis of BC WSOCs by ESI(-)FT-ICR-MS

113

BC extracts were diluted 1:10 in methanol and analyzed by negative electrospray ionization

114

(capillary voltage 4kV) on a Bruker solariX 12T FT-ICR-MS. 500 scans were acquired for each

115

spectrum (syringe infusion, 200µL·h-1) using an 8 MW acquisition size (broadband). Ion

116

accumulation time was set at 0.8sec. Samples were spiked with ES tuning mix (Agilent) and a

117

starting calibration list was developed from single point correction on the m/z 301.998139. Mass

118

spectra were analyzed using Data Analysis software (Bruker Daltonics). Peaks were assigned

119

with a signal to noise threshold of 4 and absolute intensity threshold of 2·106. Calibration lists

120

were developed over the m/z range 100-600 by Kendrick mass analysis. Mass spectra without

121

the calibrant were recalibrated with a quadratic equation with a standard deviation < 100ppb (67

122

points). Calibrated mass lists were processed with PetroOrg software. Peaks were assigned with

123

a threshold of 100ppb and molecular formulas within the range: C1-100, H4-200, O1-20, N0-4.

124

Analysis of BC WSOCs by fluorescence spectroscopy and PARAFAC

125

BC extracts were diluted in DW until the absorbance in the UV-Vis wavelength range 200-800

126

nm was 0.9, p