Species Sensitivity Distributions for Nonylphenol to Estimate Soil

Nov 8, 2017 - Nonylphenol is an endocrine-disrupting chemical that mimics estrogenic activity. Few studies have investigated the soil ecotoxicity of ...
0 downloads 0 Views 17MB Size
Subscriber access provided by READING UNIV

Article

Species Sensitivity Distributions for Nonylphenol to Estimate Soil Hazardous Concentration Jin Il Kwak, Jongmin Moon, Dokyung Kim, Rongxue Cui, and Youn-Joo An Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b04433 • Publication Date (Web): 08 Nov 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on November 9, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 31

Environmental Science & Technology

1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Species Sensitivity Distributions for Nonylphenol to Estimate Soil Hazardous Concentration Jin Il Kwak, Jongmin Moon, Dokyung Kim, Rongxue Cui, Youn-Joo An* Department of Environmental Health Science, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea * Corresponding author. Tel.: +82-2-2049-6090 Fax: +82-2-2201-6295 E-mail: [email protected]

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 2 of 31

2

13 14

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 3 of 31

Environmental Science & Technology

3 15

Abstract

16

Nonylphenol is an endocrine-disrupting chemical that mimics estrogenic activity. Few studies

17

have investigated the soil ecotoxicity of nonylphenol in the environment, based on

18

probabilistic approaches. The present study generated soil toxicity data for nonylphenol

19

through bioassays that determined the acute and chronic species sensitivity distributions and

20

estimated the hazardous concentrations of nonylphenol in soil in order to protect soil

21

ecosystems. We used eight soil-based organisms from six taxonomic groups for acute assays

22

and five soil-based organisms from four taxonomic groups for chronic assays. The hazardous

23

concentration values of nonylphenol in soil, based on acute and chronic species sensitivity

24

distributions, were estimated using compiled data from the present study, as well as previous

25

studies. This is the first study that generated sufficient data to develop species sensitivity

26

distributions for nonylphenol in soil, and to determine hazardous concentrations of

27

nonylphenol for soil environments.

28 29

Keywords; Nonylphenols; 4-nonylphenol; endocrine-disrupting chemical; species sensitivity

30

distribution; soil; terrestrial species

31

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 4 of 31

4 32

INTRODUCTION

33

Nonylphenols are used in pesticides, packaging, surfactant cleaners, and detergents1,

34

with high production volumes2. Nonylphenols are endocrine-disrupting chemicals classified

35

as xenoestrogens3,4. Due to increasing concerns about the release of nonylphenols in the

36

environment and their endocrine-disrupting properties, the use of nonylphenol in items such

37

as domestic cleaning products has been restricted in Europe5 and Korea6.

38

Nonylphenols (CAS No. 25154–52–3, C6H4(OH)C9H19) include isomers with a straight

39

chain, such as p-nonylphenol and 4-n-nonylphenol (CAS No. 104-40-5), and those with

40

branched chains, such as 4-nonylphenol (CAS No. 84852-103), among others1,4,7,8. In the

41

environment, the most common form is branched 4-nonylphenol1,7, which is detected more

42

frequently than nonylphenols with straight chains4.

43

Nonylphenols are classified as H400 (very toxic to aquatic life) and H410 (very toxic to

44

aquatic life, with long-lasting effects) according to the United Nations’ globally harmonized

45

system of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS)8,9. There are considerable data on

46

the toxic effects of nonylphenol on aquatic species, including fish10,11, water fleas12,13, and

47

freshwater algae14,15.

48

However, there have been few studies using environmental risk assessments of soil

49

ecotoxicity of nonylphenols, as shown in Tables 1 and 2, even though nonylphenols can be

50

released into the soil environment and persist there8,16. Nonylphenol concentrations have been

51

measured at 68–8834 µg/kg soil in the United States17, 2720 µ/kg soil in Canada16, and < 0.5

52

µg/kg soil in Korea18.

53

The present study aimed to estimate the hazardous concentration of nonylphenol in soil

54

ecosystems, according to environmental risk assessments. Because previous soil ecotoxicity

55

data are not sufficient to determine reliable hazardous concentrations based on probabilistic

56

approaches, we conducted a battery of bioassays using soil-based organisms of taxonomically

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 5 of 31

Environmental Science & Technology

5 57

similar groups, including species that coexist in a community, and then generated datasets to

58

derive species sensitivity distributions. Finally, we estimated acute and chronic hazardous

59

concentrations for nonylphenol in soil. This is the first study evaluating the hazardous

60

concentration of nonylphenol in soil using probabilistic ecological risk assessment

61

approaches.

62 63

MATERIALS AND METHODS

64

Test Nonylphenol and Soil Preparation

65

Nonylphenol (4-n-nonylphenol ≥ 98 % purity) in powder form was obtained from Alfa

66

Aesar (Alfa Aesar, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Seoul, Korea). The test soil was organic

67

natural soil LUFA 2.2 (Landwirtschaftliche Untersuchungs und Forschungsanstalt).

68

Physicochemical soil properties were pH 6.17, organic matter 4.7%, total nitrogen 1188

69

mg/kg, total phosphate 265 mg/kg, cation exchange capacity 7 Cmol+/kg, and water-holding

70

capacity (WHC) 0.473 mL/g. Dried soil was spiked with nonylphenol solution in acetone

71

(99.9% purity, DUCKSAN, Daejeon, Korea) to make a stock soil concentration of 2000

72

mg/kg dry soil, after which the acetone was allowed to evaporate at least overnight, with a

73

maximum evaporation time of 24 h. Subsequently, each test concentration was prepared by

74

diluting the stock soil using solvent control soil. The solvent control soil was prepared by

75

spiking dried soil with acetone only, after which the acetone was allowed to evaporate at least

76

overnight (maximum evaporation time of 24 h). Each test soil for test species was thoroughly

77

mixed with a roller mixer at least overnight (maximum mixing time of 24 h) before bioassays

78

were conducted. Control soil was spiked with deionized water.

79 80

Bioassays

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 6 of 31

6 81

A battery of bioassays was performed to estimate the hazardous concentrations of

82

nonylphenol in soil, using probabilistic approaches. To investigate short-term effects of

83

nonylphenol, eight soil species, including plants, algae, and invertebrates, were tested: mung

84

bean (Vigna radiata), rice (Oryza sativa), two green algae species (Chlorococcum infusionum

85

and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii), nematode (Caenorhabditis elegans), earthworm (Eisenia

86

andrei), and two springtail species (Lobella sokamensis and Folsomia candida). These

87

organisms represent six taxonomic groups: Magnoliopsida, Liliopsida, Chlorophyceae,

88

Secernentea, Clitellata, and Collembola. To investigate long-term effects of nonylphenol, five

89

soil species were assessed: V. radiata, O. sativa, C. infusionum, C. reinhardtii, and F.

90

candida. These species represent four taxonomic groups: Magnoliopsida, Liliopsida,

91

Chlorophyceae, and Collembola. Ecotoxicity test methods followed the OECD guidelines19-21

92

and SCI articles22-25.

93 94

Plant Assays

95

The crop plants mung bean (V. radiate, Magnoliopsida, Namyangju, Korea) and rice (O.

96

sativa, Liliopsida, Chungju, Korea) were tested to assess the phytotoxicity of nonylphenol.

97

Plant assays were conducted according to the modified OECD test guidelines20. Acute and

98

chronic effects of nonylphenol were investigated after 14 d and 21 d, respectively20. The tests

99

used nonylphenol at concentrations of 100, 500, 1000, 1500, or 2000 mg/kg dry soil for both

100

plant species. A 200-g amount of each test soil was added to a square pot (9 × 9 × 9 cm), and

101

deionized water was added up to 67% of the WHC. Five seeds were placed in each pot, and

102

each treatment was tested in triplicate. Test pots were maintained in a plant growth chamber

103

(Vision Scientific Co. Ltd., Daejeon, Korea) at 25°C, 70% humidity, and a 16:8 h light:dark

104

cycle. During exposure, deionized water was replenished every two or three days. Changes in

105

shoot growth of mung bean and rice were measured after 14 d and 21 d.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 7 of 31

Environmental Science & Technology

7 106 107

Soil Algae Assays

108

Soil algae are producers and food sources in soil ecosystems and are used in soil

109

ecotoxicity studies26,27. Test species for the soil algae assays were Chlorococcum infusionum

110

(Chlorophyceae) and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (Chlorophyceae), which inhabit soil

111

environments. C. infusionum and C. reinhardtii were purchased from the University of

112

Göttingen (Germany) and the University of Texas (Austin, USA), respectively. Toxicity of

113

nonylphenol to soil algae in the soil media was investigated following methods that were

114

previously developed in our laboratory. In brief, 0.5 g of each test soil was added to a 12-well

115

plate, and then deionized water was added up to 65% of the WHC. Subsequently, algae cell

116

suspensions were placed on the soil surface. The initial algal cell density was 3×106 cells/mL,

117

and final moisture content was 90% of the WHC. C. infusionum was exposed to nonylphenol

118

at 25, 50, 100, 200, and 300 mg/kg dry soil. C. reinhardtii was exposed to nonylphenol at 300,

119

400, 500, 600, 800, and 1000 mg/kg dry soil. Test well plates were maintained in the

120

incubator at 24°C, 100 rpm, 16:8 h light:dark cycle, and 4400–8900 lux. The change in

121

chlorophyll-a, which indicates changes in soil algal growth, was measured after 6 d. After 6 d

122

of exposure, ethanol (DUCKSAN, Daejeon, Korea) was spiked to each well to extract the

123

chlorophyll-a from soil algae. Chlorophyll-a was extracted for 3 h at 24°C in darkness.

124

Chlorophyll-a was measured using a fluorescence microplate reader (Gemini, Molecular

125

Devices, USA; excitation 420 nm and emission 671 nm). The levels of 50% effect

126

concentration (EC50) and 10% effect concentration (EC10) were considered to constitute acute

127

effects and chronic effects, respectively28.

128 129

Soil Nematode Assay

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 8 of 31

8 130

Caenorhabditis elegans, a soil nematode in the class Secernentea, is a common chemical

131

test organism29-31. Soil nematode assays were modified and performed according to Kim et

132

al.24. C. elegans were exposed to nonylphenol at concentrations of 10, 100, 500, 1000 and

133

2000 mg/kg dry soil. There were four replicates for each concentration. First, 3 g of each test

134

soil was added to a 24-well plate, followed by 0.2 mL of K-medium (0.032 M KCl, 0.051 M

135

NaCl). Subsequently, 10 young adult C. elegans were added to each well. After 24 h of

136

exposure, soils in each well were moved to an NGM agar plate (NaCl, 3 g/L; peptone, 2.5

137

g/L; agar, 17 g/L; 1 M potassium phosphate, 25 mL; 1 M CaCl2·2H2O, 1 mL; 1 M

138

MgSO4·7H2O, 1 mL; cholesterol, 1 mL). After an additional 6 h, the number of offspring

139

was counted. Test units were maintained in an incubator at 20°C under dark conditions. In the

140

soil nematode assay, 24 h exposure was considered acute exposure, based on the ASTM

141

(American Society for Testing and Materials) international standards31.

142 143

Earthworm Assay

144

Earthworms are an indicator organism for soil ecotoxicity32. In the earthworm assay,

145

Eisenia andrei (Clitellata) was tested based on modified OECD test guidelines19,23.

146

Earthworms were exposed to nonylphenol at concentrations of 1000, 1300, 1500, 1700, and

147

2000 mg/kg dry soil. Each concentration was tested with 20 replicates. First, 10 g of each test

148

soil was added to a glass vial (ID 25 mm, H 50 mm, volume 20 mL), followed by deionized

149

water up to 60% of the WHC. An adult earthworm (300–600 mg) was added to each test vial

150

and the vial was capped with a silicon stopper. Test units were maintained in an incubator at

151

20°C in dark conditions for 7 d. Normalcy of earthworms (survival, mucous secretion,

152

bleeding, swelling, thinning, and fragmentation) was measured at 7 d. In the earthworm assay,

153

7 d of exposure was considered acute exposure23.

154

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 31

Environmental Science & Technology

9 155

Collembola Assay

156

In the Collembola assay, the soil-dwelling species Lobella sokamensis and Folsomia

157

candida were selected as test species. Collembola chronic and acute exposure assays were

158

conducted according to the OECD test guidelines21 and followed An et al.22. Both

159

Collembola species were exposed to nonylphenol at concentrations of 25, 50, 100, 150, and

160

250 mg/kg dry soil. Each concentration was tested in triplicate. First, 24 g of each test soil

161

was added to a flat-bottom glass vial (volume 80 mL), followed by 6 mL of deionized water.

162

A total of 10 adult L. sokamensis were exposed for 5 d, after which survival was recorded. In

163

this assay, 5 d exposure was considered acute exposure. In the F. candida assay, acute effects

164

and chronic effects of nonylphenol were evaluated at 14 d and 21 d, respectively21. A total of

165

10 juvenile F. candida (aged 9–10 days) were exposed, and adult survival was recorded after

166

14 d. Subsequently, the number of F. candida offspring was observed after 28 d. Test vials

167

were maintained in an incubator at 20°C under dark conditions.

168 169

Statistical Analysis

170

To estimate the endpoint values, the solvent control normalized datasets of all test

171

species were analyzed using Probit analysis33, Trimmed Spearman-Karber methods34,35, and

172

Dunnett’s tests36. EC10 values and EC50 values with 95% significance level (p < 0.05) were

173

estimated by Probit analysis and Trimmed Spearman-Karber analysis, respectively. Dunnett’s

174

tests were used for calculating no-observed-effect concentration (NOEC) values based on

175

multiple comparisons33.

176 177

Estimation of Hazardous Concentration (HC) of Nonylphenol in Soil

178

HCx refers to the concentration that protects (100 - x)% of species in an ecosystem. The

179

acute and chronic hazardous concentrations for x% (HCx) were estimated based on species

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 10 of 31

10 180

sensitivity distributions (SSD)28. In the present study, HCx for nonylphenol based on SSD

181

were derived from two different sources: (1) using only our data and (2) using compiled data

182

(ours and previous data), using the USEPA SSD generator (ver. 1.0)37. Previous soil toxicity

183

results of nonylphenols are presented in Table 1. Direct comparisons between data from the

184

present and previous studies were not possible because soil toxicity depends on soil

185

properties such as organic matter, pH, and clay and moisture content38. Therefore, the soil

186

organic matter normalized endpoint value was used to generate soil SSD38. In the present

187

study, the common organic matter content of Korean soil (3.11%)39 was applied to normalize

188

toxicity results.

189 190

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

191

Plant Assays

192

No inhibition of germination in mung bean (≥ 93% germination) or rice (≥ 87%

193

germination) was observed. In the acute plant assay, after 14 d exposure (Fig. 1), shoot

194

growth of mung bean was not affected by nonylphenol at concentrations below 2000 mg/kg,

195

while shoot growth of rice was reduced by 31% at 2000 mg/kg dry soil based on solvent

196

control normalized results. Shoot growth-EC50 (14 d) values for mung bean V. radiata and

197

rice O. sativa were calculated as > 2000 and 1793 mg/kg dry soil, respectively (Table 3).

198

Shoot growth of mung bean was also inhibited after chronic exposure for 21 d. Shoot growth

199

of rice was reduced by 38% at 2000 mg/kg dry soil after chronic exposure for 21 d. As shown

200

in Table 3, the shoot growth-EC10 and NOEC values (21 d) for mung bean V. radiata were

201

estimated as 1822 and > 2000 mg/kg dry soil, respectively. For rice, the shoot growth-EC10

202

and NOEC values (21 d) were estimated as 1433 and 1500 mg/kg dry soil, respectively. In

203

this plant assay, rice showed a more sensitive response to nonylphenol than did mung bean.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 11 of 31

Environmental Science & Technology

11 204

Previously, phytotoxicity of nonylphenol was investigated in soil40-42 as well as in

205

solution42-47. Soil phytotoxicity tests were conducted in lettuce Lactuca sativa42, wheat

206

Triticum aestivum, rape Brassica napus41, bok choy Brassica rapa, and perennial ryegrass

207

Lolium perenne40 (Table 1). These previous studies showed that 14 to 15 d exposure to

208

nonylphenol in soil caused an acute phytotoxicity response. The weight of L. sativa was

209

reduced, and the EC50 (14 d) value for L. sativa was estimated to be 625 mg/kg soil42. Roberts

210

et al.41 observed that nonylphenol caused inhibition to shoot height of wheat (T. aestivum) at

211

10000 mg/kg soil, and rape (B. napus) at 1000 mg/kg dry soil. Domene et al.40 observed

212

adverse effects of nonylphenol on germination and growth of bok choy (B. rapa) and

213

perennial ryegrass (L. perenne). More recent studies found that these phytotoxicities of

214

nonylphenol were associated with vacuolar fragmentation, a decrease in chlorophyll and root

215

hair, an increase in oxidative stress, and damage to plasma membrane and chloroplasts43-45,47.

216 217

Soil Algae Assay

218

Exposure to nonylphenol affected both soil algae species. Both C. infusionum and C.

219

reinhardtii showed inhibition of growth compared with controls, as shown in Figure 1C and

220

1D. Based on solvent control normalized data, growth of C. infusionum was significantly

221

stunted by nonylphenol at 200 and 300 mg/kg dry soil (p < 0.05). Exposure to nonylphenol

222

significantly suppressed growth of C. reinhardtii at 800 and 1000 mg/kg dry soil (p < 0.05).

223

Therefore, the growth-EC50 (6 d) values for soil algae C. infusionum and C. reinhardtii were

224

calculated as 108 and 907 mg/kg dry soil, respectively. The growth-EC10 and NOEC values

225

(6 d) for C. infusionum were estimated as 17 and 100 mg/kg dry soil, respectively. For C.

226

reinhardtii, the growth-EC10 and NOEC values (6 d) were estimated as 449 and 600 mg/kg

227

dry soil, respectively (Table 3). In this soil algal assay, C. infusionum appeared to be more

228

susceptible to nonylphenol than did C. reinhardtii. A previous study also showed that C.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 12 of 31

12 229

infusionum was more sensitive than C. reinhardtii to silver nanoparticles48. These differences

230

in sensitivity between the soil algae C. infusionum and C. reinhardtii are due to differences in

231

cell walls49 and exopolymeric substances50. Previous studies evaluated the toxicity of

232

nonylphenol to freshwater algae and confirmed that the toxicity was related to antioxidant

233

responses15 and photosynthesis inhibition14,15. However, the mode of actions of effects of

234

nonylphenol on soil algae must be investigated further, as no previous studies have evaluated

235

the toxicity of nonylphenol on soil algae in soil media.

236 237

Soil Nematode Assays

238

In the soil nematode acute assays, adverse effects were observed in the control and

239

solvent control groups after 24 h. The number of offspring in the controls (deionized water

240

amended) and solvent controls (acetone amended) were 162 ± 23 and 158 ± 23, respectively.

241

However, in the exposed groups, a nonylphenol concentration–dependent decrease in

242

reproduction was observed. The number of offspring was significantly reduced starting at 100

243

mg/kg dry soil of nonylphenol (Fig. 2A). The numbers of offspring were 133 ± 25, 95 ± 8, 12

244

± 4, 4 ± 2, and 0.3 ± 0.5 at 10, 100, 500, 1000, and 2000 mg/kg dry soil, respectively.

245

Reproduction-EC50 (24 h) value for C. elegans was calculated as 140 mg/kg dry soil (Table

246

3).

247

Our results are consistent with a previous study that reported a reduction in nematode

248

reproduction in response to alkylphenol and organotin compounds51. Tominaga et al.51

249

performed a multigenerational study and observed a decrease in reproduction and fecundity

250

in C. elegans. The reduction in reproduction and fecundity in nematodes exposed to

251

nonylphenol appeared to be associated with inhibition of estrogen binding52. In contrast, Höss

252

et al.53 reported increases in growth and reproduction of C. elegans due to hormesis at lower

253

concentrations of nonylphenol. In other previous studies on nematodes30, including early

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 13 of 31

Environmental Science & Technology

13 254

studies that used experiments with solution or sediment, nonylphenol exposure caused

255

decreased survival54, changes in growth, reduced rates of reproduction, and reproductive

256

system abnormalities51,53, as well as alterations in nematode species composition55.

257 258

Earthworm Assays

259

In the earthworm soil acute test (7 d of exposure), earthworms appeared to tolerate

260

nonylphenol concentrations up to 1700 mg/kg dry soil, and no toxicological effects were

261

observed in the control and solvent control groups. However, earthworm abnormalities,

262

including mortality and mucous excretion, were observed at 1700 mg/kg dry soil of

263

nonylphenol (Fig. 2B). The normalcy-EC50 (7 d) value for E. andrei was calculated as 1828

264

mg/kg dry soil (Table 3). As shown in Tables 1 and 2, there have been some studies on

265

toxicity or bioaccumulation of nonylphenol in earthworms (Dendrobaena octaedra, Eisenia

266

fetida, and E. andrei) and white worms (Enchytraeus albidus and Enchytraeus crypticus) in

267

soil media. In a previous study56, a lower survival-LC50 value (14 d, 308 mg/kg soil) was

268

estimated for the earthworm D. octaedra, than we estimated using our data, because Jensen et

269

al.56 tested soil with lower organic matter content and a longer exposure period. Hu et al.57

270

observed no mortality and no changes in cellulose, ATPase, acetylcholinesterase, glutathione

271

reductase, and glutathione content at nonylphenol concentrations of 10 mg/kg soil. However,

272

significant damage to the DNA in coelomocytes of E. fetida was observed after 7 d exposure

273

at 10 mg/kg soil. Domene et al.40 conducted a long-term exposure test and observed a

274

decrease in reproductive activity of E. andrei after 56 d of exposure to nonylphenol. It was

275

also reported that nonylphenol may accumulate in earthworms and white worms58-61.

276

However, it remains unclear what the mode of action of nonylphenol is (for example, through

277

endocrine-mediated responses in earthworm species).

278

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 14 of 31

14 279

Collembola Assays

280

Figure 3 shows acute and chronic effects of nonylphenol on two collembola species (L.

281

sokamensis and F. candida). In the adult collembola L. sokamensis acute test, a 5-d exposure

282

of adult L. sokamensis to nonylphenol did not induce mortality up to 250 mg/kg dry soil (Fig.

283

3A). However, the number of surviving F. candida declined, starting at nonylphenol

284

concentrations of 150 mg/kg dry soil and 14 d exposure (acute). In addition, reproduction of

285

F. candida was affected, starting at nonylphenol concentrations of 150 mg/kg dry soil after

286

28 d of exposure (chronic) (Fig. 3B). At concentrations of 200 mg/kg dry soil, very severe

287

effects of nonylphenol on F. candida were observed. The survival-EC50 (5 d) value for L.

288

sokamensis and survival-EC50 (14 d) value for F. candida were calculated as > 250 and 123

289

mg/kg dry soil, respectively. The reproduction-EC10 and NOEC values (28 d) for F. candida

290

were estimated as 88 and 100 mg/kg dry soil, respectively (Table 3). Because the tested F.

291

candida (juvenile) were younger than the L. sokamensis (adult), and the exposure duration of

292

F. candida (28 d) was longer than that of L. sokamensis (5 d), lower toxicity values were

293

estimated for F. candida than for L. sokamensis.

294

As shown in Tables 1 and 2, the collembola F. candida and F. fimetaria were used to

295

evaluate soil toxicity of nonylphenol. Like our study, previous studies reported that

296

nonylphenol inhibited reproduction of collembola40,62-65 with similar ranges of reproduction-

297

EC10 values.

298 299

Estimation of the Soil Hazardous Concentration (HC) for Nonylphenol

300

Based on soil organic matter normalized toxicity data, acute and chronic SSDs are

301

described in Figure 4. Figure 4A shows acute SSD of nonylphenol using the compiled soil

302

data from Tables 1 and 3. Figure 4B shows chronic SSD of nonylphenol using the compiled

303

soil data from Tables 2 and 3. Total species data on 14 species from six taxonomic groups

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 15 of 31

Environmental Science & Technology

15 304

were used to determine acute SSD (Fig. 4A), and total species data on seven species from

305

five taxonomic groups were used to determine chronic SSD (Fig. 4B). The soil alga C.

306

infusionum and the collembola F. candida were the two species that were most sensitive to

307

nonylphenol. However, plant species such as wheat (T. aestivum) and mung bean (V. radiate)

308

tolerated nonylphenol in the soil tests, as shown in Fig. 4A and 4B, possibly because the

309

biomass of these plants was larger than that of soil algae and Collembola.

310

Regarding HC values, acute and chronic HC for nonylphenol based on SSD were

311

generated using two sources: (1) using only our data and (2) using compiled data (ours and

312

previous data) in order to estimate soil HC for nonylphenol using as much available data as

313

possible. Each estimated acute and chronic hazardous concentration (HC5, HC10, HC20, and

314

HC50) for soil ecosystem protection is shown in Table 4. Goodness of fit was also confirmed.

315

As expected, chronic HC values were lower than acute HC values. According to our data, we

316

estimated HC values of 16, 29, 61, and 252 mg/kg soil for 95%, 90%, 80%, and 50% soil

317

species protection, respectively. In addition, we estimated HC values of 58, 93, 165, and 496

318

mg/kg soil for 95%, 90%, 80%, and 50% soil species protection, respectively, for acute

319

exposure to nonylphenol in soil.

320

In conclusion, we propose that HC values from compiled data are more reliable than HC

321

values from our data alone because of the improved quantity and quality of the larger dataset.

322

Previously, predicted no-effect-concentrations (PNEC) for bisphenol A66,67 and triclosan68,

323

which are known to be endocrine-disrupting chemicals, were suggested to protect terrestrial

324

species. Although there have been concerns regarding the release of nonylphenol in soil

325

environments, there are no studies evaluating hazardous concentrations of nonylphenol for

326

soil ecosystem protection.

327

We conducted a battery of bioassays using soil algae, invertebrates, and plants, and

328

then estimated HC values of nonylphenol based on probabilistic approach methods (species

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 16 of 31

16 329

sensitivity distribution approach). The chronic HC5, HC10, HC20, and HC50 values were

330

estimated to be 16, 29, 61, and 252 mg/kg soil, respectively. The acute HC5, HC10, HC20, and

331

HC50 values were estimated to be 58, 93, 165, and 496 mg/kg soil, respectively.

332

Recently, the Canadian government established soil quality guidelines on nonylphenol

333

and its ethoxylates to protect environmental and human health69 as follows: 5.7 mg/kg dry

334

weight for agricultural, residential, and parkland soil, and 14 mg/kg mg/kg dry weight for

335

commercial and industrial soil. However, some countries (including Korea, Japan, USA,

336

Australia, and New Zealand) have no guideline values on nonylphenol in soil for ecosystem

337

protection. Therefore, we propose that the soil HC values for nonylphenol based on our SSDs

338

be used as fundamental data for conducting environmental risk assessments, and that the

339

results of the present study be applied to establish nonylphenol soil guideline values for soil

340

ecosystem protection.

341

There are some limitations in the present study. Future investigations should move

342

beyond taxonomically similar groups to include coexisting species in a community73 that

343

might be affected by nonylphenol concentrations in the soil environment.

344 345

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

346

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National

347

Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and future

348

planning (2016R1A2B3010445). This study was funded by the Korea Ministry of

349

Environment (MOE) as the Environmental Health Action Program (1485014458).

350 351

REFERENCES

352 353 354

(1) USEPA, Nonylphenol (NP) and nonylphenol ethoxylates (NPEs) actio plan. RIN 2070ZA09. 2010. (2) OECD, The 2004 OECD List of High Production Volume Chemicals. 2004.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 17 of 31

Environmental Science & Technology

17 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403

(3) Jung, E.-M.; Choi, K.-C.; Yu, F. H.; Jeung, E.-B., Effects of 17β-estradiol and xenoestrogens on mouse embryonic stem cells. Toxicol. in Vitro 2010, 24, (6), 15381545. (4) ECB, European Union Risk Assessment Report. 4-Nonylphenol (branched) and Nonylphenol. 2nd priority list, Volume 10. 2002. (5) ECHA, Annex XVII to REACH, Entry 46. In: Substances Restricted Under REACH. https://echa.europa.eu/addressing-chemicals-of-concern/restrictions/substancesrestricted-under-reach/-/dislist/details/0b0236e1807e2b6e. Last accessed in 10-Aug-2017 2017. (6) MOE, Chemicals Control Act. Public Notification 2017-76. . 2017. (7) Careghini, A.; Mastorgio, A. F.; Saponaro, S.; Sezenna, E., Bisphenol A, nonylphenols, benzophenones, and benzotriazoles in soils, groundwater, surface water, sediments, and food: a review. Environ.Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, (8), 5711-5741. (8) NICNAS, Environment tier II assessment for nonylphenols. https://www.nicnas.gov.au/chemical-information/imap-assessments/imapassessments/tier-ii-environment-assessments/nonylphenols#EnvironmentalExposure. Last accessed in 10-Aug-2017. 2017. (9) UNECE, Gobally harmonised system of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS), 3rd revised edition. . 2009. (10) Shelley, L. K.; Ross, P. S.; Kennedy, C. J., The effects of an in vitro exposure to 17βestradiol and nonylphenol on rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) peripheral blood leukocytes. Comp. Biochem. Physiol., Part C: Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2012, 155, (3), 440446. (11) Huang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Jia, X.; Ma, X.; Li, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, P.; Lu, D.; Zhao, H.; Luo, W.; Yi, S.; Liu, X.; Lin, H., Distinct expression of three estrogen receptors in response to bisphenol A and nonylphenol in male Nile tilapias (Oreochromis niloticus). Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 36, (2), 237-249. (12) Baldwin, W. S.; Graham, S. E.; Shea, D.; LeBlanc, G. A., Metabolic androgenization of female Daphnia magna by the xenoestrogen 4-nonylphenol. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1997, 16, (9), 1905-1911. (13) Hannas, B. R.; Wang, Y. H.; Thomson, S.; Kwon, G.; Li, H.; LeBlanc, G. A., Regulation and dysregulation of vitellogenin mRNA accumulation in daphnids (Daphnia magna). Aquatic Toxicology 2011, 101, (2), 351-357. (14) Perron, M.-C.; Juneau, P., Effect of endocrine disrupters on photosystem II energy fluxes of green algae and cyanobacteria. Environ. Res. 2011, 111, (4), 520-529. (15) Gao, Q. T.; Tam, N. F. Y., Growth, photosynthesis and antioxidant responses of two microalgal species, Chlorella vulgaris and Selenastrum capricornutum, to nonylphenol stress. Chemosphere 2011, 82, (3), 346-354. (16) CCME, Canadian soil quality guidelines for the protection of environmental and human health: Nonylphenol and its ethoxylates. 2002. (17) Xia, K.; Hundal, L. S.; Kumar, K.; Armbrust, K.; Cox, A. E.; Granato, T. C., Triclocarban, triclosan, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, and 4-nonylphenol in biosolids and in soil receiving 33-year biosolids application. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2010, 29, (3), 597-605. (18) NIER, Environmental monitoring of endocrine disrupting chemicals. 2006. (19) OECD, OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals No. 207. Earthworm acute toxicity tests. 1984. (20) OECD, OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals No. 208. Terrestrial plant test seedling emergence and seedling growth test. 2006.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 18 of 31

18 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453

(21) OECD, OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals No. 232. Collembolan reproduction test in soil. 2009. (22) An, Y.-J.; Kim, S. W.; Lee, W.-M., The collembola Lobella sokamensis juvenile as a new soil quality indicator of heavy metal pollution. Ecol. Indic. 2013, 27, 56-60. (23) Kwak, J. I.; Kim, S. W.; An, Y.-J., A new and sensitive method for measuring in vivo and in vitro cytotoxicity in earthworm coelomocytes by flow cytometry. Environ. Res. 2014, 134, 118-126. (24) Kim, S. W.; Moon, J.; An, Y.-J., A highly efficient non-chemical method for isolating live nematodes (Caenorhabditis elegans) from soil during toxicity assays. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2014, 34, (1), 208-213. (25) Nam, S.-H.; An, Y.-J., A rapid screening method to assess soil algal toxicity; Nondestructive sampling of algal cells using culture medium extraction. App. Soil Ecol. 2017, 120, 143-152. (26) Nam, S.-H.; An, Y.-J., An efficient and reproducible method for improving growth of a soil alga (Chlorococcum infusionum) for toxicity assays. J. Microbiol. Methods 2015, 119, 59-65. (27) Nam, S.-H.; An, Y.-J., Paper-disc method: An efficient assay for evaluating metal toxicity to soil algae. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 216, 1-8. (28) ECB, Common implementation strategy for the water framework directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance document No. 27. Technical guidance for deriving environmental quality standards. 2011. (29) Félix, M.-A.; Braendle, C., The natural history of Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr.Biol. 2010, 20, (22), R965-R969. (30) Höss, S.; Weltje, L., Endocrine disruption in nematodes: effects and mechanisms. Ecotoxicology 2007, 16, (1), 15-28. (31) ASTM, E2172-01 Standard guide for conducting laboratory soil toxicity tests with the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. 2008. (32) ISO, ISO 11268-1. Soil quality-Effects of pollutants on earthworm. Part 1: Determination of acute toxicity to Eisenia fetida/Eisenia andrei. 2012. (33) Finney, D. J., Probit analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. 1952. (34) Hamilton, M. A.; Russo, R. C.; Thurston, R. V., Trimmed Spearman-Karber method for estimating median lethal concentrations in toxicity bioassays. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1977, 11, (7), 714-719. (35) USEPA, Trimmed Spearman-Karber estimation of LC50 values users' manual, in, U. S. EPA, Office of research and development, National exposure research laboratoryecosystems research division, Center for exposure assessment modeling (CEAM), Athens, Georgia. 1999. (36) USEPA, Dunnett program version 1.5 users' manual, in, U. S. EPA, Environmental monitorign systems laboratory, Ecological monitoring research division, Cincinnati, Ohio. 1999. (37) USEPA, SSD Generator (ver. 1). 2005. (38) ECB, Technical guidance document on risk assessment. 2003. (39) MOE, Establishment of ecological risk assessment frame for soil pollution and its application scheme in Korea. 2014. (40) Domene, X.; Ramírez, W.; Solà, L.; Alcañiz, J. M.; Andrés, P., Soil pollution by nonylphenol and nonylphenol ethoxylates and their effects to plants and invertebrates. J. Soils Sediments 2009, 9, (6), 555. (41) Roberts, P.; Roberts, J. P.; Jones, D. L., Behaviour of the endocrine disrupting chemical nonylphenol in soil: Assessing the risk associated with spreading contaminated waste to land. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2006, 38, (7), 1812-1822.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 19 of 31

Environmental Science & Technology

19 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501

(42) Hulzebos, E. M.; Dirven-Van Breemen, E. M.; van Dis, W. A.; Herbold, H. A.; Hoekstra, J. A.; Baerselman, R.; van Gestel, C. A. M.; Adema, D. M. M.; Henzen, L., Phytotoxicity studies with Lactuca sativa in soil and nutrient solution. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1993, 12, (6), 1079-1094. (43) De Bruin, W.; Kritzinger, Q.; Bornman, M. S.; Korsten, L., Nonylphenol, an industrial endocrine disrupter chemical, affects root hair growth, shoot length and root length of germinating cos lettuce (Lactuca sativa). Seed Sci. Technol. 2016, 44, (1), 43-52. (44) De Bruin, W.; van der Merwe, C.; Kritzinger, Q.; Bornman, R.; Korsten, L., Ultrastructural and developmental evidence of phytotoxicity on cos lettuce (Lactuca sativa) associated with nonylphenol exposure. Chemosphere 2017, 169, 428-436. (45) De Bruin, W.; van der Merwe, C. F.; Kritzinger, Q.; Bornman, R. M. S.; Korsten, L., Morphological characterisation of lettuce plasma membrane ultrastructure and vesicle formation caused by nonylphenol: A scanning electron microscopy study. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2017, 111, 176-181. (46) Esteban, S.; Llamas, P. M.; García-Cortés, H.; Catalá, M., The endocrine disruptor nonylphenol induces sublethal toxicity in vascular plant development at environmental concentrations: A risk for riparian plants and irrigated crops? Environ. Pollut. 2016, 216, 480-486. (47) Zhang, Q.; Wang, F.; Xue, C.; Wang, C.; Chi, S.; Zhang, J., Comparative toxicity of nonylphenol, nonylphenol-4-ethoxylate and nonylphenol-10-ethoxylate to wheat seedlings (Triticum aestivum L.). Ecotoxicol. Environ.l Saf. 2016, 131, 7-13. (48) Kwak, J. I.; Cui, R.; Nam, S.-H.; Kim, S. W.; Chae, Y.; An, Y.-J., Multispecies toxicity test for silver nanoparticles to derive hazardous concentration based on species sensitivity distribution for the protection of aquatic ecosystems. Nanotoxicology 2016, 10, (5), 521-530. (49) Domozych, D.; Ciancia, M.; Fangel, J.; Mikkelsen, M.; Ulvskov, P.; Willats, W., The Cell Walls of Green Algae: A Journey through Evolution and Diversity. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, (82). (50) Zhou, K.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yang, K.; Lin, D., The role of exopolymeric substances in the bioaccumulation and toxicity of Ag nanoparticles to algae. 2016, 6, 32998. (51) Tominaga, N.; Tomoeda, M.; Kohra, S.; Takao, Y.; Nagae, M.; Ueda, K.; Ishibashi, Y.; Kai, T.; Arizono, K., A convenient sublethal assay of alkylphenol and organotin compounds using the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Health Sci. 2002, 48, (6), 555-559. (52) Hood, T. E.; Calabrese, E. J.; Zuckerman, B. M., Detection of an estrogen receptor in two nematode species and inhibition of binding and development by environmental chemicals. Ecotoxicol. Environ.l Saf. 2000, 47, (1), 74-81. (53) Höss, S.; Jüttner, I.; Traunspurger, W.; Pfister, G.; Schramm, K.-W.; Steinberg, C. E. W., Enhanced growth and reproduction of Caenorhabditis elegans (Nematoda) in the presence of 4-Nonylphenol. Environ. Pollut. 2002, 120, (2), 169-172. (54) Ura, K.; Kai, T.; Sakata, S.; Iguchi, T.; Arizono, K., Aquatic acute toxicity testing using the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Health Sci. 2002, 48, (6), 583-586. (55) Höss, S.; Traunspurger, W.; Everin, G. F. S.; Jüttner, I.; Pfister, G.; Schramm, K.-W., Influence of 4-nonylphenol on the structure of nematode communities in freshwater microcosms. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2004, 23, (5), 1268-1275. (56) Jensen, D.; Bayley, M.; Holmstrup, M., Synergistic interaction between 4-nonylphenol and high but not low temperatures in Dendrobaena octaedra. Ecotoxicol. Environ.l Saf. 2009, 72, (1), 10-16.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 20 of 31

20 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550

(57) Hu, C.; Cai, Y.; Wang, W.; Cui, Y.; Li, M., Toxicological effects of multi-walled carbon nanotubes adsorbed with nonylphenol on earthworm Eisenia fetida. Environ. Sci.: Proc. Impacts 2013, 15, (11), 2125-2130. (58) Yang, C.-W.; Tang, S.-L.; Chen, L.-Y.; Chang, B.-V., Removal of nonylphenol by earthworms and bacterial community change. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2014, 96, 917. (59) Shan, J.; Wang, T.; Li, C.; Klumpp, E.; Ji, R., Bioaccumulation and bound-residue formation of a branched 4-nonylphenol isomer in the geophagous earthworm Metaphire guillelmi in a rice paddy soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, (12), 4558-4563. (60) Shan, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Yan, X.; Ji, R., Effects of the geophagous earthworm Metaphire guillelmi on sorption, mineralization, and bound-residue formation of 4nonylphenol in an agricultural soil. Environ. Pollut. 2014, 189, 202-207. (61) Patrício Silva, A. L.; Amorim, M. J. B.; Holmstrup, M., Uptake and elimination of 4nonylphenol in the enchytraeid Enchytraeus albidus. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 2016, 96, (2), 156-161. (62) Skovlund, G.; Damgaard, C.; Bayley, M.; Holmstrup, M., Does lipophilicity of toxic compounds determine effects on drought tolerance of the soil collembolan Folsomia candida? Environ. Pollut. 2006, 144, (3), 808-815. (63) Sørensen, T. S.; Holmstrup, M., A comparative analysis of the toxicity of eight common soil contaminants and their effects on drought tolerance in the collembolan Folsomia candida. Ecotoxicol. Environ.l Saf. 2005, 60, (2), 132-139. (64) Gejlsbjerg, B.; Klinge, C.; Samsøe-Petersen, L.; Madsen, T., Toxicity of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates and nonylphenol in sludge-amended soil. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2001, 20, (12), 2709-2716. (65) Scott-Fordsmand, J. J.; Krogh, P. H., The influence of application form on the toxicity of nonylphenol to Folsomia fimetaria (Collembola: Isotomidae). Ecotoxicol. Environ.l Saf. 2004, 58, (3), 294-299. (66) Staples, C.; Friederich, U.; Hall, T.; Klečka, G.; Mihaich, E.; Ortego, L.; Caspers, N.; Hentges, S., Estimating potential risks to terrestrial invertebrates and plants exposed to bisphenol A in soil amended with activated sludge biosolids. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2010, 29, (2), 467-475. (67) Kwak, J. I.; Moon, J.; Kim, D.; Cui, R.; An, Y.-J. Determination of the soil hazardous concentrations of bisphenol A using the species sensitivity approach. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, In press. (68) Amorim, M. J. B.; Oliveira, E.; Soares, A. M. V. M.; Scott-Fordsmand, J. J., Predicted No Effect Concentration (PNEC) for triclosan to terrestrial species (invertebrates and plants). Environ. Int. 2010, 36, (4), 338-343. (69) CCME, http://st-ts.ccme.ca/en/index.html. Last accessed in 10-Aug-2017. 2017. (70) Kwak, J. I.; Moon, J.; Kim, D.; An, Y.-J., Soil ecotoxicity of seven endocrine-disrupting chemicals: A review. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2017, 68, 621-649. (71) Widarto, T. H.; Holmstrup, M.; Forbes, V. E., The influence of nonylphenol on lifehistory of the earthworm Dendrobaena octaedra Savigny: linking effects from the individual- to the population-level. Ecotoxicol. Environ.l Saf. 2004, 58, (2), 147-159. (72) Widarto, T. H.; Krogh, P. H.; Forbes, V. E., Nonylphenol stimulates fecundity but not population growth rate (λ) of Folsomia candida. Ecotoxicol. Environ.l Saf. 2007, 67, (3), 369-377. (73) Belanger, S., Barron, M., Craig, P., Dyer, S., Galay-Burgos, M., Hamer, M., Marshall, S., Posthuma, L., Raimondo, S., Whitehouse, P., Future needs and recommendations in the development of species sensitivity distributions: Estimating toxicity thresholds for

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 21 of 31

Environmental Science & Technology

21 551 552 553

aquatic ecological communities and assessing impacts of chemical exposures. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2017. 13(4), 664-674.

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 22 of 31

22 554 555 556 557

Table 1. List of acute endpoint values from previous studies. Each endpoint value was normalized using the soil organic matter value of 3.11%. Species sensibility distributions were created using the species geomean values. This table was adapted from Kwak et al.70. Test soil species

Test Soil organic duration matter (%) 21 d 3

Endpoints (mg/kg soil)

References

Survival

64

7d 14 s 14 d

1.4

Growth

Soil A: 2.9 Soil B: 8.9 Soil C: 7.96 Soil D: 5.61

Growth Soil A Growth Soil B Growth Soil C Growth Soil D Growth Soil A Growth Soil B Growth Soil C Growth Soil D Survival Reproduction Reproduction Weight

NOEC: 50 LOEC: 100 LC10: 67 LC50: 133 EC50: 559 EC50: 625 EC50: >10000 EC50: >10000 EC50: >10000 EC50: 9500 EC50: 800 EC50: 650 EC50: 1000 EC50: 3500 LC50: 308 EC50: 53 LOEC: 30 EC10: 739 EC50: 4012 EC10: 1386 EC50: 7501 EC10: 575 EC50: 1449 EC10: 696 EC50: 8159 OECD EC10: 664 EC50: 907 EC10: 24 EC50: 226 PRA EC10: 215 EC50: 316 EC10: 456 EC50: 640 UAB EC10: 227 EC50: 615 EC10: 197 EC50: 213 LC50: 90 EC50: 50 NOEC: 75 LOEC: 100 LC50: 124 NOEC: 2000

-

-

O. sativa

14-d

EC50

1793

-

1645 b

C. elegans

24-h

Shoot growth inhibition Shoot growth inhibition Reproduction

EC50

140

-

128 b

E. andrei

7-d

Normalcy

EC50

1828

(1779-1878)

1677 b

L. sokamensis

5-d

Survival

EC50

> 250

-

-

F. candida

14-d

Survival

EC50

123

(115-132)

113 b

C. infusionum

6-d

Growth inhibition

EC10

17

(2.7-37)

16 b

NOEC

100

-

92

EC10

449

(249-548)

412 b

NOEC

600

-

552

EC10

1822

-

1671 b

NOEC

> 2000

-

-

EC10

1433

(1315-1515)

1314 b

NOEC

1500

-

1376

EC10

88

(1.2-125)

81 b

NOEC

100

-

92

C. reinhardtii Chronic V. radiata

568 569 570

95% confidence interval

Normalized a value (mg/kg dry soil)

6-d 21-d

Growth inhibition Shoot growth inhibition

O. sativa

21-d

Shoot growth inhibition

F. candida

28-d

Reproduction

a

Soil organic matter normalized value. Soil organic matter normalized value = endpoint value × 3.11% / 3.39% b Values used for estimating species sensitivity distribution.

571

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 25 of 31

Environmental Science & Technology

25 572 573 574 575 576 577

Table 4. The acute and chronic hazardous concentrations for x% (HCx) were estimated based on species sensitivity distributions (SSD). HCx for nonylphenol based on SSD were derived from two sources: (1) using only our data and (2) using compiled data (ours and previous data), using the USEPA SSD generator (ver. 1.0)37. We estimated the HCx with lower and upper prediction intervals based on the compiled data from the current and previous studies. HCx represents the concentration that protects (100 - x) % of species in an ecosystem.

578 Data from the present study

Compiled data from this study and previous research

Acute

Chronic

Acute

Chronic

HC5

31 (4–242)

9 (1–66)

58 (28–118)

16 (6–42)

HC10

53 (8–363)

18 (3–119)

93 (46–186)

29 (11–73)

HC20

105 (18–617)

45 (8–254)

165 (84–323)

61 (25–145)

HC50

386 (74–2000)

259 (52–1289)

496 (258–953)

252 (110–576)

(mg/kg soil)

579 580

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 26 of 31

26 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588

Fig. 1. Shoot growth inhibition of (A) mung bean (Vigna radiate) and (B) rice (Oryza sativa). Biomass inhibition of (C) soil algae (Chlorococcum infusionum) and (D) soil algae (Chlamydomonos reinhardtii) due to nonylphenol exposure. (A–B) Plants were exposed to nonylphenol in soil for 14 days (acute) and 21 days (chronic). (C–D) Soil algae were exposed to nonylphenol in soil for 6 days. The asterisks (*) indicate significant differences from the solvent control (p < 0.05).

589 590 591 592 593

Fig. 2. Inhibition of (A) reproduction of soil nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and (B) normalcy of earthworm Eisenia andrei after nonylphenol exposure. (A) Nematodes were exposed to nonylphenol in soil for 21 hours (acute). (B) Earthworms were exposed to nonylphenol in soil for 7 days (acute). The asterisks (*) indicate significant differences from solvent control (p < 0.05).

594 595 596 597 598 599

Fig. 3. Inhibition of (A) survival of Collembola Lobella sokamensis and (B) survival (acute) and reproduction (chronic) of Collembola Folsomia candida exposed to nonylphenol in soil. (A) L. sokamensis was exposed to nonylphenol in soil for 5 days (acute). Adult L. sokamensis tolerated nonylphenol well. (B) F. candida was exposed to nonylphenol in soil for 14 days (acute) and 28 days (chronic). The asterisks (*) indicate significant differences from solvent control (p < 0.05).

600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609

Fig. 4. Species sensitivity distributions (SSDs) of nonylphenol based on the soil toxicity data. (A) Acute SSD of nonylphenol using the compiled data from Tables 1 and 3. A total of 14 species from six taxonomic groups were used, and acute HCx values (Table 4) were estimated based on acute SSD. Blue dots indicate data from the present study, and green dots indicate data from previous studies. (B) Chronic SSD of nonylphenol using the compiled data from Tables 2 and 3. A total of seven species from five taxonomic groups were used, and chronic HCx values (Table 4) were estimated based on chronic SSD. Red dots indicate data from the present study and yellow dots indicate data from previous studies. The 95% confidence interval is shown by a dashed line around the curve.

Figure Captions

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 27 of 31

Environmental Science & Technology

27 610 611

Figure 1.

612

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 28 of 31

28 613 614

Figure 2.

615

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 29 of 31

Environmental Science & Technology

29 616 617 618

Figure 3.

619

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

Page 30 of 31

30 620

Figure 4.

621

622

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 31 of 31

Environmental Science & Technology

90x60mm (150 x 150 DPI)

ACS Paragon Plus Environment