Stability, Cellular Uptake and in Vivo Tracking of Zwitterion Modified

Stability, Cellular Uptake and in Vivo Tracking of Zwitterion Modified Graphene Oxide as Drug Carrier. Jing Zhang ... Publication Date (Web): August 8...
0 downloads 0 Views 5MB Size
Article Cite This: Langmuir XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX

pubs.acs.org/Langmuir

Stability, Cellular Uptake, and in Vivo Tracking of Zwitterion Modified Graphene Oxide as a Drug Carrier Jing Zhang,*,† Liqun Chen,† Jiada Chen,† Quan Zhang,‡ and Jie Feng*,† †

College of Materials Science & Engineering and ‡Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology for Industrial Pollution control of Zhejiang Providence, College of Environment, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310014, China

Langmuir Downloaded from pubs.acs.org by STOCKHOLM UNIV on 09/30/18. For personal use only.

S Supporting Information *

ABSTRACT: In this paper, a novel kind of zwitterion modified graphene oxide (GO) for promoting stability and reducing aggregation of GO as a drug carrier was proposed and demonstrated. Specifically, the GO was functionalized with a kind of zwitterion based silane, 3-(dimethyl(3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl)ammonio)propane-1-sulfonate (SBS). After zwitterion modification, the SBS functionalized GO (GO-SB) shows significantly enhanced stability in both serum-free and serum-containing solution, especially after loading doxorubicin hydrochloride (DOX). According to drug release profiles, the drug-loaded GOSB exhibits thermosensitive and sustained release behavior. Meanwhile, in vitro studies show that the DOX loaded GO-SB could be easily internalized by HepG2 cells and exhibit obvious cytotoxicity on the cells. And, in vivo studies demonstrate that the GO-SB drug carrier is capable of being taken by the larvae of zebrafish and can be eliminated from the body within several days.



sodium alginate (SA),18,19 chitosan,20,21 albumin,22 R9 peptide,23 and PEG24 to modify GO. The results have shown that these methods could enhance the solubility of GO based materials in water. But long-term stability of the GO carriers in biomedia or after drug loading has rarely been investigated in the above works. Liu and co-workers reported a naphthalene-terminated PEG (NP) modified GO nanosystem.25 In their study, they found PEG could improve the stability of the GO nanosystem in serum-free and serumcontaining media. But PEGylated materials are found to generate anti-PEG antibodies when used in vivo,26,27 which causes worry about the future of PEGylated therapeutics. To overcome deficiency of PEG, zwitterionic materials emerged as a class of biomaterials with superhydrophilic characteristics, mediated by electrostatic interactions between zwitterions and surrounding water molecules.28,29 Zwitterionic materials bear simultaneously a pair of oppositely charged ions in the same moiety while maintaining an overall neutral charge. Here, we tried to use zwitterions to modify GO in order to prolong the stability of the GO based drug carrier. As shown in Figure 1, we synthesized a kind of zwitterion based silane and anchored the zwitterionic ligand on planes and edges of the GO. The results demonstrated that zwitterions coated on the GO greatly enhanced the stability of the GO in serumcontaining solution even after drug loading, and zwitterion

INTRODUCTION Graphene, a two-dimensional highly ordered lattice of sp2 hybridized carbon atoms, has attracted the great interest of researchers since it was first reported in 2004.1 Because of its prominent mechanical, electronic, and optical properties,2−4 it has been widely used in various fields. Unfortunately, the hydrophobic property of pure graphene and its tendency to agglomerate due to van der Waals interaction and strong π−π stacking between the nanosheets hinders application of graphene in biological fields, such as application in loading antineoplastic drugs and genes. As a graphene derivative, graphene oxide (GO) also has a large two-dimensional plane which provides ultrahigh specific surface area to load drugs through surface adsorption, π−π interaction, hydrogen bonding, and so on.5 Furthermore, it has been well documented that GO is biocompatible and nontoxic, making GO a promising candidate for construction of drug carriers.6−10 GO can yield stable suspensions in water initially after being exfoliated into monolayer sheets, but it suffers from aggregation with time. And GO may aggregate immediately in biomedia, especially after loading with anticancer drugs, which would strongly limit exploration of GO based materials in biological environments. Therefore, GO may need to be properly functionalized. Fortunately, hydrophilic oxygenated functional moieties on basal planes and edges of GO11,12 not only provide it with water solubility but also enable GO to be further functionalized.13,14 In the past decade, various hydrophilic polymers have been utilized to modify GO to promote its stability and reduce its aggregation, including natural and synthetic ones. For example, some research groups have used dextran, cyclodextrin,15−17 © XXXX American Chemical Society

Special Issue: Zwitterionic Interfaces: Concepts and Emerging Applications Received: June 13, 2018 Revised: August 1, 2018 Published: August 8, 2018 A

DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01995 Langmuir XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX

Article

Langmuir

After that, 100 μL of culture medium with various concentrations of the samples were added separately. The cells were incubated for another 48 h. Then, all the culture mediums were refreshed, followed by the addition of 20 μL of MTT (5 mg/mL) in each well. And the cells were further incubated for 4 h. Finally, the culture medium in each well was replaced by 150 μL of DMSO. The optical density (OD) was determined by microplate reader (DG5033A, Huadong electronics) at 490 nm. The relative cell viability was calculated by following formula: cell viability (%) =

ODcontrol − ODblank

× 100%

where ODsample was obtained in the presence of the samples, ODcontrol was obtained in absence of the samples, and ODblank was obtained in blank well. All the samples were sterilized previously. In Vivo Tracking and Biosafety Evaluation of the GO-SBFITC in Zebrafish Embryos and Larvae. Fertilized eggs were obtained from natural mating of adult zebrafish (Danio rerio AB line) bred at the Animal Center of Zhejiang University. Embryos were collected within 2 h after spawning. Newly fertilized eggs, approximately at a stage of 12 cells, were exposed to the GO-SBFITC (100 μg/mL) for 5 days. One egg was placed in each well of a 96-well plate. During the exposure, 50% of solution in each well was displaced with fresh GO-SB-FITC solution every day. After 5 days of static exposure, the larvae or embryos were washed with water and incubated in aerating water for further observation; meanwhile, 90% of the water was replaced daily. The embryos and larvae were incubated at approximately 27 °C for 14 h under daylight and 10 h in the dark each day. Each experiment was repeated three times. At the same time, embryos and larvae incubated in aerating water were used as control. FITC is used as a fluorescent tracer, which helps us understand the distribution and metabolism of the GO-SB-FITC in the body.31 All observations were done by Axio Observer A1 fluorescent inverted microscope. Ethics Statement on the Use of Animals. The research animals are provided with the best possible care and treatment and are under the care of a specialized technician. All procedures were approved by Zhejiang University of Technology and were conducted in accord with the Guiding Principles for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Figure 1. (A) Synthesis of the DOX@GO-SB and GO-SB-FITC. (B) In vitro cellular uptake of the DOX@GO-SB complex. (C) In vivo tracking of the GO-SB-FITC in zebrafish embryos and larvae.

modified GO exhibited favorable biocompatibility both in vitro and in vivo. We hope that the zwitterion modified GO will be applicable for most hydrophobic aromatic drugs other than anticancer drugs and thereby promote development of graphene based nanomaterial in biomedical applications.



ODsample − ODblank

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials. Doxorubicin hydrochloride (DOX) was brought from Beijing HVSF united chemical materials Co., Ltd. Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. The embryos were purchased from Zhejiang University. Sample Preparation. The details of the synthesis of GO, GO-SB, DOX@GO-SB, and GO-SB-FITC are described in the Supporting Information. In Vitro Drug Release from DOX@GO-SB. A 6 mL portion of the above DOX@GO-SB solution was divided into three parts equally and was transferred to three dialysis tubes (MWCO: 8000−14 000 Da). After that, the tubes were immersed in 10 mL of 0.1 M PBS solution (pH = 7.4) and incubated at 37, 40, and 45 °C, respectively. At predetermined time intervals, 2 mL of dialysate was withdraw from the solution, and another 2 mL of fresh PBS solution was added to keep the volume invariable. The accumulative drug released was determined by fluorescence spectrophotometer (FL-4600, Hitachi) with an excitation wavelength of 470 nm and a slit width of 5 nm. Stability Tests of the GO, GO-SB, DOX@GO, and DOX@GOSB. The concentrations of all the samples were determined by fluorescence spectrophotometer, and all of them were diluted to 1 mg/mL. For each sample, 4 mL of solution was transferred into a vial and subjected to ultrasonic oscillation for 10 min. Meanwhile, equivalent volume of DI water or 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS) was added to the vial, respectively. Thus, the final concentration of all the samples was 0.5 mg/mL. Results about the stability of these samples were recorded by digital camera. In Vitro Cellular Internalization of the DOX@GO-SB. To check cellular uptake of the DOX@GO-SB, HepG2 cells were seeded in a 24-well plate (8000 cells per well) and incubated with 1 mL of DMEM containing 10% FBS for 24 h (37 °C, 5% CO2). Subsequently, the DOX@GO-SB was added into culture medium at a concentration of 50 μg/mL. The cells were coincubated with the DOX@GO-SB for 30 min, 1, and 2 h, respectively. Then, after the culture medium was removed, the cells were washed with PBS for several times and observed by fluorescent inverted microscope (Axio Observer A1, Carl Zeiss). In Vitro Cytotoxicity Study. In vitro cytotoxicity of the GO-SB, DOX@GO-SB and free DOX were measured by studying viabilities of HepG2 cells with MTT assay.30 In brief, the cells were seeded in 96well plates with a density of 5000 cells each well and incubated with 100 μL of DMEM containing 10% FBS for 24 h (37 °C, 5% CO2).



RESULTS AND DISCUSSION In this work, a kind of zwitterion based silane, SBS, is used to modify GO to improve its stability. First, GO was synthesized via a modified Hummer method and characterized by XRD. As shown in Figure S1, the diffraction peak at about 2θ = 26° is graphite’s characteristic d002 peak. After graphite is oxidized, the peak disappears completely whereas a new, sharp diffraction peak appears at 2θ = 8.5°, confirming that GO is prepared successfully. In fact, the diffraction peak of GO is usually near 2θ = 10°.32 The difference between them may result from the preparation process. During the washing process of GO, water molecules penetrate into and thereby increase the space between the GO sheets via ultrasound. And, the structure of the GO is fixed by freeze-drying which leads to the left-shifting of diffraction peak of GO. Afterward, the GO was reacted with SBS to obtain GO-SB. Zeta potential values of the materials were characterized. Compared with the zeta potential of graphite (−18.3 mV), that of GO decreases a lot to −33.64 mV (Table S1). During the oxidation process, a large amount of hydroxyl and carboxyl groups are generated on planes and edges of the GO, resulting in a significant decrease of its zeta potential.33 Meanwhile, it should be noted that these hydrophilic oxygenated groups are the basis for further functions of GO. After the GO is modified with SBS, its zeta potential changes to −23.28 mV. B

DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01995 Langmuir XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX

Article

Langmuir

Figure 2. HRTEM image (A) and AFM images (B, C) of the GO-SB.

successfully. After modification of the GO with the SBS, a new absorption band at 1037 cm−1 attributed to stretching vibrations of Si−O appeared (Figure 3B), confirming that the zwitterion based silane is connected to the GO sheet. Then, a kind of aromatic drug, DOX, which is often used for cancer treatment, was loaded on the GO-SB though π−π interaction to obtain DOX@GO-SB. According to the spectrum of DOX@GO-SB (Figure 3C), absorption peaks at 1211 and 1281 cm−1 prove the existence of DOX on GO-SB. Since it has been reported that graphene has an efficient fluorescence quenching effect,34 thus to further investigate preparation of the DOX@GO-SB complexes, we tried to measure fluorescence of the DOX@GO-SB complexes and free DOX of corresponding amount loaded on the DOX@GO-SB. First, the amount of the DOX in the DOX@GO-SB complexes was calculated. Results show that DLE of the DOX@GO-SB is about 23.8%. Then, we prepared a solution with an equivalent amount of free DOX as a control. As shown in Figure S2, the fluorescence intensities of the DOX@GO-SB complexes decrease about 59.3% compared with that of free DOX. This further confirms that the DOX has been successfully attached onto surface of the GO-SB. Afterward, the size distributions of the GO, GO-SB, and DOX@GO-SB were characterized by dynamic light scattering (DLS, Zetasizer Nano ZS90), and results are displayed in Figure S3. As shown, average hydrated sizes of the GO, GOSB, and DOX@GO-SB are 190.1, 164.2, and 220.0 nm, respectively. Correspondingly, the PDI of GO, GO-SB, and DOX@GO-SB are 0.387, 0.365, and 0.475, respectively. According to the results, we find that after the GO was modified with zwitterion ligand, its hydrated particle size is slightly reduced. This indicates that dispersion of the GO in water is improved after modifying of GO with zwitterion. And it should be noted that because of the zwitterion coating, a hydration layer is formed around the GO-SB. And this may cause the obtained hydrated size of the GO-SB given by DLS to become larger than its actual size. In addition, we find that size of the DOX@GO-SB complexes increases a bit after the DOX is loaded. To some extent, DOX plays the role of a bridge and narrows the distance between the nanosheets. Consequently, the nanosheets are easy to aggregate, resulting in increase of average size of the DOX@GO-SB complexes. Then, to study effect of the zwitterion modification, we tested stabilities of the GO, GO-SB, DOX@GO, and DOX@ GO-SB in aqueous solution. As shown in Figure 4A, at the beginning, the GO and GO-SB solution are stable while their color darkens and light transmittance decreases with time due to their gradual agglomeration. But until the 24th day, no

Considering that the SBS is neutrally charged, the zeta potential of the resulting GO-SB increases after part of the negatively charged hydroxyl groups on the GO are reacted with the SBS. This suggests that modification of the GO is successful. The amount of zwitterion ligand in the GO-SB was determined by element analysis. Results are exhibited in Table S2. The amount of SB in the GO-SB is calculated via the following formulas: WSB = MSB/(MN /WN )

or

WSB = MSB/(MS /WS)

Where WSB represents weight percentage of SB in the GO-SB, while WN and WS represent weight percentage of N and S in the GO-SB. And MSB, MN, and MS represent molar mass of SB, N, and S. The results calculated by the above two formulas are 67.3% and 67.5% respectively, which strongly prove that the zwitterion ligand is modified on the GO successfully. Then we utilized high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) to study morphology of the GO-SB. As shown in Figure 2A, we find that the GO-SB is almost transparent when observed by HRTEM, implying that the GO-SB nanosheets are extremely thin. Their thickness was about 1.0 nm measured by AFM (Figure 2B and C). As reported, the thickness of monolayer graphene is approximately 0.335 nm.1 This indicates that the GO-SB prepared in this study contains 2−3 layers. Meanwhile, all functionalization steps were monitored by FTIR to verify their success. As presented in Figure 3A, a sharp band at 1730 cm−1 corresponding to stretching vibrations of CO in carboxyl groups indicates that graphite is oxidized

Figure 3. FTIR spectra of the GO (A), GO-SB (B), and DOX@GOSB (C). C

DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01995 Langmuir XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX

Article

Langmuir

Figure 4. Digital photos of dispersion of the GO, GO-SB, DOX@GO, and DOX@GO-SB in water and 10% FBS solution.

precipitate is found from both samples. In general, there is no remarkable difference between stability of the GO and the GOSB in water. However, the situation is quite different after the GO and the GO-SB load with DOX. We find that the DOX@ GO starts to precipitate immediately at the very beginning (Figure 4B). A period of 30 min later, the precipitation is obvious and the DOX@GO has precipitated completely after being placed statically for 1 day. Conversely, the DOX@GOSB solution is still stable. As shown, the color of the DOX@ GO-SB solution becomes darker at the sixth day. Nevertheless, until the 24th day, no obvious precipitation is observed in the DOX@GO-SB solution. Hence, we come to conclusion that after modified with zwitterion, GO would be more stable in water as a drug carrier. Previous studies have reported that a protein coating termed “protein corona” would be around the surface of nanomaterials after the nanomaterials are absorbed by human or other mammalian organisms,35,36 which may lead to immune response or cause damage to cells and tissues bringing about health risks. Since drug carriers need to be used in biomedia, we subsequently tried to investigate stability of the GO and the GO-SB in 10% FBS solution. As Figure 4C shows, the GO could not be well dispersed in 10% FBS solution initially and its dispersion is very turbid. Not surprisingly, the GO in 10% FBS solution starts to precipitate at the third day. The poor stability of GO in 10% FBS solution is due to the inherently high adsorption capacity of the GO.37 On the one hand, the diameter of the GO becomes bigger because of the absorption of protein. On the other hand, similar to DOX, serum components in FBS act as bridges between separate GO sheets, which decreases the distance between them and induces them to aggregate. On the contrary, the GO-SB could be well dispersed in 10% FBS solution at the beginning. And the solution was clear for several days. With time, it becomes a little turbid at the seventh day and it is not until the 12th day, a little precipitate is observed at the bottom of the vial. Whether these samples could be stable in FBS

solution or not depends on their antifouling properties. Zwitterionic materials could bind water molecules via electrostatic induction to form a hydration layer which could separate proteins from surface of materials,37 and thus, the distance between the GO-SB sheets is also widened. That is why the GO-SB is much more stable than pure GO in serumcontaining solution. As shown in Figure 4D, the stabilities of the DOX@GO and the DOX@GO-SB in 10% FBS solution are also studied. More obvious distinction is found between them. The DOX@GO has precipitated completely at the first day. As for the DOX@ GO-SB, although the color of the solution is very dark, no precipitate is observed at the bottom until the seventh day. And, the precipitate is extremely little. Additionally, the situation does not become worse until the 12th day, implying that most of the DOX@GO-SB still remains dispersed in 10% FBS solution. From these results, we find that after loading of drugs, the stability of the DOX@GO-SB in 10% FBS solution is decreased compared with that of the GO-SB without drugs. As already stated, we speculate that the GO sheets approach each other through DOX which act as a bridge. In spite of this, generally speaking, modification of GO with zwitterion indeed effectively improves stability of GO in serum owing to antifouling property of zwitterion. In this study, to investigate release behavior of DOX from the DOX@GO-SB, in vitro drug release experiment was carried out at 37, 40, and 45 °C, respectively. As represented (Figure 5), profiles show sustained DOX release at all three temperatures whereas release rates of the drugs at 40 and 45 °C are higher than that of 37 °C during observing period. After about 80 h, the drug release rate is dramatically decreased for all temperatures and only a very small amount of drug was released. Over a 6 day period, about 70% of the drug could be released at 40 and 45 °C while 54% was released at 37 °C. According to previous literature,38 there are many hydrogen bonds between the DOX and the GO sheets besides π−π stacking. Virtual π−π stacking interaction decreases the D

DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01995 Langmuir XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX

Article

Langmuir

increases and the distribution of DOX in the cell changes obviously with incubation time. For example, after 0.5 h coincubation, DOX is evenly distributed inside the cell. However, with time, DOX begins to concentrate in nuclei. And after 2 h, almost no red fluorescence of DOX could be observed outside nuclei. All these results strongly demonstrate that GO-SB could be efficiently taken by tumor cells when used as a drug carrier. To evaluate the tumor therapy efficacy of our graphene based drug carrier, in vitro cell viability was studied in HepG2 cells by MTT assays and the corresponding data are displayed in Figure 7. As shown, unloaded GO-SB does not exhibit an

Figure 5. In vitro drug release profiles of the DOX@GO-SB at different temperatures.

distance between the GO sheets and drug molecules thus making them easy to form hydrogen bonds. Herein, both interactions of π−π stacking and hydrogen bonds attach the DOX molecules tightly on surface of the GO sheets. Since hydrogen bonding would be weakened with increase of temperature, the drug molecules could move easier and the diffusion rate of the solution also become faster, resulting in a difference in release rate of the DOX at different temperatures. These results indicate that the DOX@GO-SB complexes are sensitive to temperature and more drug can be released when temperature is slightly higher. Furthermore, many studies have reported that graphene and GO have strong near-infrared absorption with excellent photothermal effects;39−43 thus the synthesized DOX@GO-SB complexes hold potential for synergistic therapy. With a view to demonstrate potential biomedical application of the DOX@GO-SB complexes, first in vitro uptake experiments were carried out. As Figure 6 shows, red fluorescence (due to the DOX) could clearly be observed for HepG2 cells after 0.5 h incubation with the DOX@GO-SB complexes. Meanwhile, intracellular red fluorescence intensity

Figure 7. Viabilities of HepG2 cells after incubation with different concentrations of GO-SB, DOX@GO-SB, and free DOX for 48 h, respectively.

obvious inhibition effect on the cells for all concentration range. However, after DOX is loaded, DOX@GO-SB shows pronounced cytotoxic effect on HepG2 cells. That is to say that cytotoxicity of DOX@GO-SB is mainly due to the loaded DOX. And, the IC50 of DOX@GO-SB was calculated to be

Figure 6. Fluorescent inverted microscope images of HepG2 cells after incubation with the DOX@GO-SB for different time: bright field images (left), fluorescence field images (mid), and overlap of bright field and fluorescence field (right). The scale bar is 20 μm. E

DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01995 Langmuir XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX

Article

Langmuir 1.675 μg/mL (containing 0.05 μg/mL DOX). Furthermore, from Figure 7, it can be seen that DOX@GO-SB is more toxic than free DOX at the same DOX concentration. This may be caused by the proton pump effect of the cells. When the intracellular DOX concentration is too high, the DOX would be pumped out by the cells.44 Since DOX loaded on the GOSB could be released gradually in the cells, the effective time of DOX is greatly extended, which therefore achieves a better inhibition effect on the cells. Another possibility is that free DOX is easier to degrade by intracellular enzymes than that which is loaded on drug carrier. Thus, cytotoxic effects of free DOX are reduced. A lot of researches related to graphene as a drug carrier have focused on its antitumor effect efficacy yet ignoring their metabolic problems which is crucial to the fate of the drug carrier in the body. Thus, a biosafety evaluation of GO-SB in vivo was carried out and demonstrated in the zebrafish model. Zebrafish is a kind of animal with similar physiological and pharmacological properties to humans; thus, it is widely used in test of different biomaterials, genetics, and auxology. Moreover, its tiny and transparent body along with strong fecundity is beneficial for zebrafish to be used as a model animal to study the properties of various materials.45,46 FITC, a fluorescent label, was modified on GO-SB for observation. In this study, zebrafish was treated with GO-SB-FITC for 5 days from embryo stage. Data show that viability of zebrafish incubated with the GO-SB-FITC is 86.7% while that of control group treated with water is 87.8% (n = 30). There is no significant difference between them. Meanwhile, no deformed individual is observed in both of those groups. That means that GO-SB has no obvious toxicity on embryos and of zebrafish, indicating that the GO-SB is very biocompatible. And this is consistent with results given by the in vitro study of cytotoxicity on HepG2 cells. According to Figure 8, it could be seen that there was green fluorescence stuck on the membrane of the embryos at the first day (Figure 8A1 and A2). After the embryos were hatched at the third day, green fluorescence was transferred into the body of larvae, proving that the GO-SB could be taken by the larvae (Figure 8B1 and B2). Subsequently, the larvae were transferred to fresh water at the end of the fifth day. By observing daily, we find out that fluorescence in the body of the larvae fades gradually and almost disappears at the ninth day due to excretion (Figure 8C1 and C2), suggesting that the GO-SB drug carrier can be eliminated from body of zebrafish within 5 days. This is favorable with a view to drug release time of the DOX@GOSB that about 70% of the drug loaded can be released within 5 days (Figure 5). More importantly, the current study shows that GO-SB could be removed from the body after the drug was released.

Figure 8. Images of zebrafish embryo exposure to GO-SB-FITC (A1, A2), larva after treatment with GO-SB-FITC for 5 days (B1, B2), and then treated with fresh water for 4 days (9th day) (C1, C2): (left) fluorescence field, (right) bright field.

evaluation of GO-SB on the zebrafish model indicates that the GO-SB has good biocompatibility in vivo and can be excreted from the body within several days. Moreover, it deserves to be mentioned that the GO-SB drug carrier has considerable capability to load various therapeutic substances. Such a facile, efficient, yet low-cost approach offers extraordinary potential for a graphene-based nanosystem in biochemical applications.



ASSOCIATED CONTENT

S Supporting Information *

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01995. Detailed preparation of the GO, GO-SB, DOX@GO-SB, and GO-SB-FITC complexes, additional figures and tables (PDF)





AUTHOR INFORMATION

Corresponding Authors

*E-mail: [email protected] (J.Z.). *E-mail: [email protected] (J.F.).

CONCLUSIONS In this paper, we have proposed a novel kind of zwitterion modified GO for promoting stability and reducing aggregation of GO used as a drug carrier. After SBS modification, the drug loaded GO-SB demonstrates significantly enhanced stability in serum-free and serum-containing solution compared with pure GO. The in vitro studies show that the DOX loaded GO-SB could be effectively internalized by HepG2 cells and exhibited an obvious inhibition effect on the cells which is more effective than free DOX. Meanwhile, without drug loading, the GO-SB shows negligible cytotoxicity on HepG2 cells, revealing the favorable biocompatibility of the GO-SB. And, in vivo biosafety

ORCID

Jing Zhang: 0000-0002-0245-7149 Quan Zhang: 0000-0001-9112-0662 Jie Feng: 0000-0001-7228-117X Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.



ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was funded by Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LY17E030005) and the National F

DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01995 Langmuir XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX

Article

Langmuir

(19) Lei, H.; Xie, M.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, F.; Xu, Y.; Xie, J. Chitosan/ Sodium Alginate Modificated Graphene Oxide-Based Nanocomposite as a Carrier for Drug Delivery. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 17798−17805. (20) Liu, L.; Li, C.; Bao, C.; Jia, Q.; Xiao, P.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Q. Preparation and Characterization of Chitosan/Graphene Oxide Composites for the Adsorption of Au(III) and Pd(II). Talanta 2012, 93, 350−357. (21) Zhao, X.; Wei, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Miao, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Yang, W.; Jia, X.; Liu, Z.; Hou, H. Design and Development of Ggraphene Oxide Nanoparticle/Chitosan Hybrids Showing pH-Sensitive Surface Charge-Reversible Ability for Efficient Intracellular Doxorubicin Delivery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 6608−6617. (22) Jokar, S.; Pourjavadi, A.; Adeli, M. Albumin-Graphene Oxide Conjugates; Carriers for Anticancer Drugs. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 33001− 33006. (23) Hashemi, M.; Yadegari, A.; Yazdanpanah, G.; Jabbehdari, S.; Omidi, M.; Tayebi, L. Functionalized R9−Reduced Graphene Oxide as an Efficient Nano-Carrier for Hydrophobic Drug Delivery. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 74072−74084. (24) Yang, L.; Wang, F.; Han, H.; Yang, L.; Zhang, G.; Fan, Z. Functionalized Graphene Oxide as a Drug Carrier for Loading Pirfenidone in Treatment of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Colloids Surf., B 2015, 129, 21−29. (25) Liu, C. W.; Xiong, F.; Jia, H. Z.; Wang, X. L.; Cheng, H.; Sun, Y. H.; Zhang, X. Z.; Zhuo, R. X.; Feng, J. Graphene-Based Anticancer Nanosystem and Its Biosafety Evaluation Using a Zebrafish Model. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 358−366. (26) Garay, R. P.; Elgewely, R.; Armstrong, J. K.; Garratty, G.; Richette, P. Antibodies Against Polyethylene Glycol in Healthy Subjects and in Patients Treated with PEG-Conjugated Agents. Expert Opin. Drug Delivery 2012, 9, 1319−1323. (27) Zhang, P.; Sun, F.; Tsao, C.; Liu, S.; Jain, P.; Sinclair, A.; Hung, H. C.; Bai, T.; Wu, K.; Jiang, S. Zwitterionic Gel Encapsulation Promotes Protein Stability, Enhances Pharmacokinetics, and Reduces Immunogenicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2015, 112, 12046− 12051. (28) Sun, F.; Hung, H. C.; Sinclair, A.; Zhang, P.; Bai, T.; Galvan, D. D.; Jain, P.; Li, B.; Jiang, S.; Yu, Q. Hierarchical Zwitterionic Modification of a SERS Substrate Enables Real-Time Drug Monitoring in Blood Plasma. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13437. (29) Chou, Y. N.; Sun, F.; Hung, H. C.; Jain, P.; Sinclair, A.; Zhang, P.; Bai, T.; Chang, Y.; Wen, T. C.; Yu, Q.; et al. Ultra-Low Fouling and High Antibody Loading Zwitterionic Hydrogel Coatings for Sensing and Detection in Complex Media. Acta Biomater. 2016, 40, 31−37. (30) Zhang, B.; Yang, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhai, G. Heparin Modified Graphene Oxide for pH-Sensitive Sustained Release of Doxorubicin Hydrochloride. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 2017, 75, 198−206. (31) Lv, Y.; Tao, L.; Annie Bligh, S. W.; Yang, H.; Pan, Q.; Zhu, L. Targeted Delivery and Controlled Release of Doxorubicin into Cancer Cells Using a Multifunctional Graphene Oxide. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 2016, 59, 652−660. (32) An, J.; Gou, Y.; Yang, C.; Hu, F.; Wang, C. Synthesis of A Biocompatible Gelatin Functionalized Graphene Nanosheets and Its Application for Drug Delivery. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 2013, 33, 2827− 2837. (33) Sahu, A.; Kim, M.; Ryu, J.; Son, J. G.; Lee, E.; Noh, D. Y.; Tae, G. Nanographene Oxide as a Switch for CW/Pulsed NIR Laser Triggered Drug Release from Liposomes. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 2018, 82, 19−24. (34) Zhang, H.; Zhang, H.; Aldalbahi, A.; Zuo, X.; Fan, C.; Mi, X. Fluorescent Biosensors Enabled by Graphene and Graphene Oxide. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 89, 96−106. (35) Pitek, A. S.; et al. Nanomedicine: The Protein Corona of Plant Virus Nanoparticles Influences their Dispersion Properties, Cellular Interactions, and In Vivo Fates. Small 2016, 12, 1682−1682. (36) Pederzoli, F.; Tosi, G.; Genovese, F.; Belletti, D.; Vandelli, M. A.; Ballestrazzi, A.; Forni, F.; Ruozi, B. Qualitative and Semi-

Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 21404091 and 21404089).



REFERENCES

(1) Novoselov, K. S.; Geim, A. K.; Morozov, S. V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S. V.; Grigorieva, I. V.; Firsov, A. A. Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films. Science 2004, 306, 666−669. (2) Xia, F.; Farmer, D. B.; Lin, Y.; Avouris, P. Graphene Field-Effect Transistors with High On/Off Current Ratio and Large Transport Band Gap at Room Temperature. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 715−718. (3) Wu, Q.; Xu, Y.; Yao, Z.; Liu, A.; Shi, G. Supercapacitors Based on Flexible Graphene/Polyaniline Nanofiber Composite Films. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 1963−1970. (4) Chang, H.; Tang, L.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, J.; Li, J. Graphene Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Aptasensor for the Thrombin Detection. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 2341−2346. (5) Yang, X.; Wang, Y.; Huang, X.; Ma, Y.; Huang, Y.; Yang, R.; Duan, H.; Chen, Y. Multi-Functionalized Graphene Oxide Based Anticancer Drug-Carrier with Dual-Targeting Function and pHSensitivity. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 3448−3454. (6) Yang, H.; Bremner, D. H.; Tao, L.; Li, H.; Hu, J.; Zhu, L. Carboxymethyl Chitosan-Mediated Synthesis of Hyaluronic AcidTargeted Graphene Oxide for Cancer Drug Delivery. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 135, 72−78. (7) Xu, G.; Xu, P.; Shi, D.; Chen, M. Modification of Graphene Oxide by a Facile Coprecipitation Method and Click Chemistry for Use as a Drug Carrier. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 28807−28813. (8) Zhao, X.; Liu, L.; Li, X.; Zeng, J.; Jia, X.; Liu, P. Biocompatible Graphene Oxide Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery Platform for Tumor Microenvironment- Responsive Triggered Release of Doxorubicin. Langmuir 2014, 30, 10419−10429. (9) Zhao, H.; Ding, R.; Zhao, X.; Li, Y.; Qu, L.; Pei, H.; Yildirimer, L.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, W. Graphene-Based Nanomaterials for Drug and/ or Gene Delivery, Bioimaging, and Tissue Engineering. Drug Discovery Today 2017, 22, 1302−1317. (10) He, D.; He, X.; Wang, K.; Zou, Z.; Yang, X.; Li, X. RemoteControlled Drug Release from Graphene Oxide-Capped Mesoporous Silica to Cancer Cells by Photoinduced Ph-Jump Activation. Langmuir 2014, 30, 7182−7189. (11) Tang, L. C.; Wan, Y. J.; Yan, D.; Pei, Y. B.; Zhao, L.; Li, Y. B.; Wu, L. B.; Jiang, J. X.; Lai, G. Q. The effect of Graphene Dispersion on the Mechanical Properties of Graphene/Epoxy Composites. Carbon 2013, 60, 16−27. (12) Zhu, Y.; Murali, S.; Cai, W.; Li, X.; Suk, J. W.; Potts, J. R.; Ruoff, R. S. Graphene and Graphene Oxide: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 3906−3924. (13) Yang, X.; Tu, Y.; Li, L.; Shang, S.; Tao, X. M. Well-Dispersed Chitosan/Graphene Oxide Nanocomposites. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2010, 2, 1707−1713. (14) Li, Y.; Yang, J.; Zhao, Q.; Li, Y. Dispersing Carbon-Based Nanomaterials in Aqueous Phase by Graphene Oxides. Langmuir 2013, 29, 13527−13534. (15) Meng, N.; Su, Y. T.; Zhou, N.; Zhang, M.; Shao, M.; Fan, Y.; Zhu, H.; Yuan, P.; Chi, C.; Xiao, Y. Carboxylated Graphene Oxide Functionalized with β-CyclodextrinEngineering of a Novel Nanohybrid Drug Carrier. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 93, 117−122. (16) Tan, J.; Meng, N.; Fan, Y.; Su, Y.; Zhang, M.; Xiao, Y.; Zhou, N. Hydroxypropyl-β-Cyclodextrin-Graphene Oxide Conjugates: Carriers for Anti-Cancer Drugs. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 2016, 61, 681− 687. (17) Wei, G.; Dong, R.; Wang, D.; Feng, L.; Dong, S.; Song, A.; Hao, J. Functional Materials from the Covalent Modification of Reduced Graphene Oxide and β-Cyclodextrin as a Drug Delivery Carrier. New J. Chem. 2014, 38, 140−145. (18) Fan, L.; Ge, H.; Zou, S.; Xiao, Y.; Wen, H.; Li, Y.; Feng, H.; Nie, M. Sodium Alginate Conjugated Graphene Oxide as a New Carrier for Drug Delivery System. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 93, 582−590. G

DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01995 Langmuir XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX

Article

Langmuir quantitative Analysis of the Protein Coronas Associated to Different Functionalized Nanoparticles. Nanomedicine 2018, 13, 407−422. (37) Qin, W.; Li, X.; Bian, W. W.; Fan, X. J.; Qi, J. Y. Density Functional Theory Calculations and Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Adsorption of Biomolecules on Graphene Surfaces. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 1007−1016. (38) Cao, Z.; Jiang, S. Super-Hydrophilic Zwitterionic Poly(Carboxybetaine) and Amphiphilic Non-Ionic Poly(Ethylene Glycol) for Stealth Nanoparticles. Nano Today 2012, 7, 404−413. (39) Wu, J.; Wang, Y. S.; Yang, X. Y.; Liu, Y. Y.; Yang, J. R.; Yang, R.; Zhang, N. Graphene Oxide Used as a Carrier for Adriamycin Can Reverse Drug Resistance in Breast Cancer Cells. Nanotechnology 2012, 23, 355101. (40) Yang, K.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, G.; Sun, X.; Lee, S. T.; Liu, Z. Graphene in Mice: Ultrahigh in Vivo Tumor Uptake and Efficient Photothermal Therapy. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 3318−3323. (41) Meng, D.; Yang, S.; Guo, L.; Li, G.; Ge, J.; Huang, Y.; Bielawski, C. W.; Geng, J. The Enhanced Photothermal Effect of Graphene/ Conjugated Polymer Composites: Photoinduced Energy Transfer and Applications in Photocontrolled Switches. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 14345−14348. (42) Yao, X.; Tian, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Hanagata, N. Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Capped with Graphene Quantum Dots for Potential Chemo-Photothermal Synergistic Cancer Therapy. Langmuir 2017, 33, 591−599. (43) Chauhan, G.; Chopra, V.; Tyagi, A.; Rath, G.; Sharma, R. K.; Goyal, A. K. ″Gold Nanoparticles Composite-Folic Acid Conjugated Graphene Oxide Nanohybrids″ for Targeted Chemo-Thermal Cancer Ablation: in Vitro Screening and in Vivo Studies. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 96, 351−361. (44) Akyuz, L.; Sargin, I.; Kaya, M.; Ceter, T.; Akata, I. A New Pollen-Derived Microcarrier for Pantoprazole Delivery. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 2017, 71, 937−942. (45) Basnet, R. M.; Guarienti, M.; Memo, M. Zebrafish Embryo as an in Vivo Model for Behavioral and Pharmacological Characterization of Methylxanthine Drugs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 596. (46) Li, Y.; Miao, X.; Chen, T.; Yi, X.; Wang, R.; Zhao, H.; Lee, S. M.; Wang, X.; Zheng, Y. Zebrafish as a Visual and Dynamic Model to Study the Transport of Nanosized Drug Delivery Systems Across the Biological Barriers. Colloids Surf., B 2017, 156, 227−235.

H

DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01995 Langmuir XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX