Stiffened Nanocomposite Hydrogels by Using Modified Cellulose

Apr 30, 2019 - Interactions between the nanofibers and polymer matrix play an important ... Microwave-Assisted Reduction of Electric Arc Furnace Dust ...
4 downloads 0 Views 691KB Size
Subscriber access provided by ALBRIGHT COLLEGE

Letter

Stiffened nanocomposite hydrogels by using modified cellulose nanofibers via plug flow reactor method Xianpeng Yang, Subir K. Biswas, Hiroyuki Yano, and Kentaro Abe ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/ acssuschemeng.9b01322 • Publication Date (Web): 30 Apr 2019 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 1, 2019

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

1

Title:

2

Stiffened nanocomposite hydrogels by using modified cellulose nanofibers via plug flow reactor

3

method

4

Authors:

5

Xianpeng Yang†*, Subir K. Biswas†, Hiroyuki Yano†, Kentaro Abe† *

6

†Affiliation: Research Institute for Sustainable Humanosphere, Kyoto University, Gokasho, Uji,

7

Kyoto, 611-0011, Japan

8

*Corresponding author:

9

Xianpeng Yang: [email protected];

10

Kentaro Abe: [email protected]

1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

11

Abstract

12

Cellulose nanofibers (CNFs), hydrophilic natural nanomaterials, are widely used to reinforce the

13

stiffness of hydrogels, which have wet properties similar to those of human tissues. Interactions

14

between the nanofibers and polymer matrix play an important role in reinforcing hydrogels. Here,

15

we used a CNF cake as a reactor to modify the surface of CNFs, which was based on the principle

16

of a plug flow reactor (PFR), excepting to enhance interfacial interactions. As a result, the degree

17

of substitution of maleic acid monoester-modified CNFs reached 0.14 at room temperature within

18

25 min. The crystallinity and morphology of modified CNFs were well maintained. The modified

19

CNFs were used to form composites with poly(acrylamide-co-acrylic acid) networks, followed

20

by ionic cross-linking. The elastic modulus of the nanocomposite hydrogels increased

21

considerably from 10.27 ± 0.48 MPa to 24.67 ± 0.53 MPa after the CNF modification process.

22

This PFR method shows great potential for preparing a range of CNF-based functional

23

nanocomposite materials.

24

Key words: hydrogels, cellulose nanofibers, stiffness, modification, plug flow, engineering

25

approach

2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 14

Page 3 of 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

26

Introduction

27

Hydrogels are wet and soft materials, comprising hydrophilic polymer networks, which hold large

28

amounts of water.1 Hydrogels have attracted considerable research attention in recent years owing

29

to their similar wet properties to human tissues.2-3 However, the majority of synthesized hydrogels

30

are softer than human tissues, such as skin, cartilage, and ligament.3-4 Cellulose nanofibers (CNFs)

31

are hydrophilic natural materials, which are extremely stiff and strong and are thus widely used

32

to reinforce hydrogels.5-6 The addition of a small amount of CNFs markedly improves the stiffness

33

of hydrogels; however, the stiffness remains much lower than that of human tissues for three

34

reasons.7 First, the stiffness of CNF networks in wet condition is lost because of disengagement

35

of interfibrillar hydrogen bonds. Second, it is difficult to increase the CNF content owing to the

36

high viscosity. Third, physical interactions between CNFs and the polymer matrix are weak under

37

wet conditions. We recently reported on stiff hydrogels with a high CNF content formed by

38

filtering a CNF suspension to form a wet cake.8-9 Modification of the surface of CNFs represents

39

another way to introduce covalent or non-covalent bonds between nanofibers and polymer matrix

40

to give stiffer hydrogels.5-6

41

Although CNFs, which are made up cellulose, are amenable to a range of modifications,10-11 it

42

remains difficult to develop a simple and efficient method to modify the surface of CNFs.

43

Modification processes typically require the CNFs to be present at low concentrations, which

44

limits the reaction efficiency and increases solvent consumption. Furthermore, pre-treatment and

45

post-treatment by solvent-exchange are required, making the modification process tedious and

46

environmentally unfriendly.10 Additionally, under severe reaction conditions, the crystallinity

47

and/or morphology of CNFs might change.10 On the other hand, the difficulties of CNF

48

modification can be addressed through engineering approaches rather than chemistry alone. For

49

example, chemical modification is performed before nanofabrication to reduce energy

50

consumption.12-13 New groups have also been induced during nanofabrication by ball milling or

3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

51

with the use of nanocellulose sheets.14-15

52

Here, we report a new CNF modification method, inspired by the fluid in a plug flow reactor

53

(PFR). The fluid in the PFR is not mixed in the axial direction and thus no back-mixing occurs.

54

Similarly, filtering a CNF suspension results in a wet CNF cake where nanochannels form with a

55

large aspect ratio.16 Fluid moves through the nanochannels under the force of a vacuum may show

56

negligible back-mixing phenomenon. The water in the CNF cake can be readily replaced by a

57

mixture of solvent and reactant. At the same time, the reaction between the CNFs and reactant

58

mixture occurs and the surface of CNFs is modified. We examined the reaction of CNFs and

59

maleic anhydride (MA) using a CNF cake as reactor.17 Notably, Fe3+-cross-linked

60

poly(acrylamide-co-acrylic acid) [poly(AM-co-AA)] is widely used to prepare tough

61

hydrogels.18-19 We used the maleic acid monoester modified CNFs (MACNFs) to form composites

62

with poly(AM-co-AA), followed by ionic cross-linking. Here, the MACNFs, containing double

63

bonds and carboxyl groups, were grafted through poly(AM-co-AA) chains and ionically cross-

64

linked with AA units, which improved interactions between the nanofibers and matrix. We

65

performed tensile testing to compare the mechanical properties of the nanocomposite hydrogels

66

reinforced by modified CNFs having different degree of substitution (DS).

67

Experimental section

68

All the chemicals were laboratory grade and used as received. The CNFs were prepared according

69

to our previously reported method.9, 20 The MACNF cake was prepared using the PFR method. In

70

a typical procedure (Entry 4, Table 1), a total of 200 mL of CNF suspension (0.1 wt%) was

71

vacuum filtered to form a wet CNF cake with a water content of approximately 90 wt%. A mixed

72

solution, containing 1.16 g of MA, 1.6 mL of triethylamine (TEA), and 30 mL of

73

dimethylacetamide (DMAc), was filtered through the cake. Then, 10 mL of ethanol and 50 mL

74

of water were filtered through the cake in turn to obtain the purified MACNF cake. In the whole

75

process, the degree of vacuum, produced by a circulating water aspirator, was kept constant at 2.5 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 14

Page 5 of 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

76

kPa.

77

The resulting MACNF cake was immersed in a mixture containing the monomers (AM and AA),

78

the initiator (ammonium persulphate, APS), and the cross-linker (N,N’-methylenebisacrylamide,

79

MBA). The concentration of AM and AA was fixed at 2 and 0.3 mol/L corresponding to the

80

volume of water. The moles of APS and MBA were fixed to be 0.001 times the monomer content.

81

After immersion at 4 °C for 24 h, the cake was fixed between two glass slides and sealed with a

82

silica cushion. The polymerization was performed at 80 °C for 12 h to form the poly(AM-co-AA)

83

networks. The polymerized cake was immersed in FeCl3 aqueous solution (0.06 M) for 24 h to

84

ionically cross-link the poly(AM-co-AA) network. Finally, the ionically cross-linked hydrogel

85

was immersed in a large amount of water to remove excess FeCl3 and reach an equilibrium state,

86

resulting in MACNF hydrogels. The composition of the MACNF hydrogels was tested by weight

87

method. The MACNF hydrogels were named as DSn according to the DS of the used nanofibers.

88

For example, DS0.063 means that the MACNF hydrogel was prepared from the MACNFs with a

89

DS of 0.063. DS0 means that the hydrogel was prepared from the CNFs without modification.

90

The DS of MACNFs was measured by a titration method.21 Simply, a MACNF suspension (20 g,

91

0.05 wt%) was neutralized with NaOH aqueous (0.02 M), which was repeated twice. Fourier

92

transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were recorded on a Spectrum Two spectrometer (PerkinElmer

93

Inc., Waltham, MA) in the range of 400–4000 cm−1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were

94

performed with CuKα radiation (40 kV and 300 mA) from 5° to 40° in reflection mode.9 The

95

SEM images were obtained at an acceleration voltage of 1.5 kV. Samples were dried at room

96

temperature overnight and at 110 °C for 10 min, and then coated with platinum by sputtering for

97

90 s.9 For thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), dried samples of 5-mg weight were heated under a

98

nitrogen atmosphere from 110 °C to 600 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1.9 The tensile testing

99

was performed at a stretch velocity 20 mm·min−1 using dumbbell-shaped samples (width: 2 mm,

100

length: 35 mm, gauge length: 20 mm). Five specimens were tested for each sample.9

5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

101

Results and discussions

102

Modification of CNFs via PFR method

103

First, a CNF suspension (200 ml, 0.1 wt%) was filtered to form a CNF cake where there exist

104

nanochannels (Fig. 1a).16 The nanochannels had a large aspect ratio because the thickness of the

105

CNF cake was about 0.5 mm, much larger than the diameter of nanochannels (tens of nanometers).

106

Therefore, the flow in the nanochannels under the force of vacuum might show negligible back-

107

mixing phenomenon (Fig. 1b). Then, a reactant mixture containing MA, TEA as the activator/H+

108

scavenger,17 and DMAc as the solvent was passed through the CNF cake. It was assumed that the

109

water in the CNF cake was replaced by the reactant mixture gradually ( I to III, Fig. 1c). At same

110

time, the reaction between the surface of CNFs and MA occurred (Fig. 1d). After the reaction, the

111

cake was washed by passing ethanol and water through the cake. The translucent CNF cake

112

became much more transparent after modification (Fig. 1a), owing to the negative charge of the

113

maleic acid monoester.21 Fig. 1e illustrates how the concentration of nanofibers changed in

114

preparation of MACNF cake by using the PFR method and the conventional solvent exchange

115

(SE) method. For PFR method, pre-treatment process was not required and the concentration of

116

nanofibers almost kept constant after filtering a CNF suspension. In addition, the reaction was

117

performed at high concentration and the purification process was also simplified. In contrast, the

118

SE method was more tedious and less effective.

6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 14

Page 7 of 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

119 120

Fig. 1. PFR inspired modification of CNFs. (a) Illustration of the modification process: CNF suspension

121

was vacuum filtered and the reactant solution was passed through the wet CNF cake. (b) Model of PFR: no

122

back-mixing occurs in the axial direction. (c) Fluid and reactions in the CNF cake. Orange dashed arrows

123

show the path of the reactant. Blue dashed arrows show ethanol. I to III: water was gradually replaced by

124

the reactant mixture; III to V: the reactant mixture was gradually replaced by ethanol. (d) Reaction between

125

CNFs and MA. (e) Concentration of nanofibers during different steps. Step I: pre-treatment. Several times

126

of solvent exchange are required for SE method. Step Ⅱ: reaction. Step III: purification. Several times of

127

solvent exchange are required for SE method. Step Ⅳ: preparation of MACNF cake. SE method was

128

described according to reported process.21

129

Fig. 2a shows the normalized FTIR spectra of CNFs and MACNFs, confirming the successful

130

modification. Absorption peaks of the maleic acid monoester group attached to CNFs appeared

131

at 1722, 1637, 1578 and 1423 cm−1. We attributed the peak at 1722 cm−1 to stretching vibrations

132

of the C=O groups in the ester linkage and the peaks at 1578 and 1423 cm−1 to carboxylate groups

133

with a conjugated form.13, 21 We assigned the peak at 1637 cm−1 to characteristic C=C stretching

134

vibrations. Within 25 min at room temperature, the DS reached 0.14 (Table 1, No. 4), indicating

135

that the modification was effective. The DS was controlled by changing the volume and/or

136

composition of reactant solution (Table 1). The volume of solvent had a more pronounced effect

7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

Page 8 of 14

137

on the DS than did the concentration of MA, indicating that residence time was the controlling

138

factor. A lower vacuum force also prolongs the residence time, which may result in a higher DS

139

for the same reactant mixture.

140

Table 1. Composition of reactant mixtures and corresponding DS of MACNFs. Reactant mixture Entry

DS of MACNFs MA/g

TEA/mL

DMAc/mL

1

0.29

0.4

15

0.045

2

0.29

0.4

20

0.054

3

1.16

1.6

20

0.073

4

1.16

1.6

30

0.14

141

The XRD spectra in Fig. 2b show that both the CNFs and MACNFs had cellulose I crystal

142

structures. Unlike CNF modification processes performed under more severe conditions, no

143

broadening of the CNF peaks was observed in our case.21 The crystallinity index (CrI), calculated

144

by the Segal method,22 increased from 63.2% to 68.4% as the DS of MACNFs increased from 0

145

to 0.17 (Fig. 2b). Furthermore, the MACNFs and CNFs shared a 15–40-nm diameter and a length

146

of several micrometers (Fig. 3). The MACNFs showed the more distinct appearance than that of

147

CNFs. We suggest that the changes of crystallinity and appearance occurred through partial

148

degradation of amorphous regions. The mild conditions had minor effects on both the crystallinity

149

and morphology. In terms of thermal stability, as the DS increased to 0.17, the initial

150

decomposition temperature (i.e., the 5%-degradation temperature) of the MACNFs decreased to

151

229.8 °C, which was lower than that of the CNFs (257.5 °C). This decrease might be attributed

152

to the larger surface areas and the presence of less stable carboxyl groups in the MACNFs.10, 13

153

To illustrate the versatility of current method, we performed modifications with various other

154

kinds of groups. The current method is applicable for different types of modifications in both

155

organic solvents and aqueous conditions. We will build mathematical models of CNF cake-based 8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 9 of 14

156

reactor and report in another paper. We expect that other nanocelluloses, including cellulose

157

nanocrystals and bacterial cellulose might be modified based on this wet cake reactor principle. (a)

1722

1578

(b)

1423

200

CNFs MACNFs

1800

1700

1600

1500

Intensity

Absorbance

1637

1400

CNFs MACNFs

CrI=68.4% CrI=63.2%

4000

3200

2400 1600 Wavelength (cm-1)

800

(c)100

10

15

20 25 2 [deg.]

30

35

(d)1.5

CNFs MACNFs

60 40 20

40

CNFs MACNFs

1.2

80

0 100

158

5

Deriv. (%/oC)

Mass remaining (%)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

0.9 0.6 0.3 0.0

200

300

400

500

600

Temperature (oC)

200

300

400

500

600

Temperature (oC)

159

Fig. 2. (a). FT-IR spectra of CNFs and MACNFs. (b). XRD spectra of CNFs and MACNFs.

160

Thermogravimetric analysis of CNFs and MACNFs: integral curves (c); differential curves (d).

161 162

Fig. 3. SEM images of CNFs (a) and MACNFs (b).

163

Stiffened nanocomposite hydrogels

164

We applied our MACNF cake to prepare nanocomposite hydrogels, which we expected to

165

improve the stiffness of the resulting composite. As shown in Fig. 4a, after modification and

166

purification, the MACNF cake was immersed in monomer solution containing 2 mol/L of AM,

9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

167

0.3 mol/L of AA and a small amount of covalent cross-linker and initiator. Poly(AM-co-AA)

168

networks were formed after polymerization (Fig. 4a-2). MACNFs could be grafted through

169

poly(AM-co-AA) chains, through double bonds on the maleic acid ester groups. Then, the

170

carboxyl groups on the acrylic acid groups of poly(AM-co-AA) and the surface of MACNFs were

171

further cross-linked by Fe3+. Finally, the resulting hydrogels were immersed in water until

172

equilibrium to form MACNF hydrogels (Fig. 4a-3). Three samples of MACNF hydrogels were

173

prepared by using the nanofibers with different DS, as shown in Table 2. DS0.063 and DS0 had

174

almost the same compositions while DS0.17 showed a little decrease in water content. When

175

slightly modified MACNFs (DS = 0.063) were used, the elastic modulus increased from 10.27 to

176

17.53 MPa and the fracture stress increased from 6.08 to 7.32 MPa, compared with that of the

177

DS0 hydrogels (Fig. 4b-c). When the DS of the MACNFs reached 0.17, the stiffness and strength

178

increased to 24.67 and 7.68 MPa, respectively. Considering that the samples possessed very

179

similar compositions, the differences of the interactions between the nanofibers and matrix might

180

be the main reason for the increasement of elastic modus and fracture strength. For DS0 sample,

181

the layered CNFs were firmly surrounded by tough polymer matrix which might enable the

182

orientation of nanofibers. As a result, the elongation was relatively high. However, the main

183

interactions between CNFs and matrix were hydrogen bonds and entanglements, which were

184

relatively weak. For DS0.063 and DS0.17 samples, covalent and ionic bonds were introduced

185

between nanofibers and matrix. The additional cross-linking enhanced the friction force between

186

nanofibers and matrix, resulting in increased modulus and strength. The decreased elongation of

187

MACNF hydrogels probably arose from the rigidity of additional ionic cross-linking,23 which

188

restrained the orientation of nanofibers.

189

We previously reported that a high CNF content, formed by filtering a CNF suspension to form a

190

wet cake, facilitates the improvement of stiffness.8-9 Here, we conclude that generating strong

191

interactions between the nanofibers and polymer matrix is also essential for preparing stiff

192

hydrogels. Although the importance of interfacial interactions has received considerable 10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 10 of 14

Page 11 of 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

193

attention,24-25 extremely stiff hydrogels have rarely been achieved with CNF reinforcement, as

194

analyzed in the Introduction section. In the next work, we will study on the role of covalent and

195

ionic bonds separately by different modification of CNFs. In addition, the use of a wet nanofiber

196

cake as a reactor represents a simple and versatile method for modifying CNFs with various kinds

197

of groups. We predict that our PFR method will be applicable to other CNF-based functional

198

materials, such nanopapers and aerogels.26-27

199 200

Fig. 4. (a) Preparation and structure of MACNF hydrogels. Tensile properties: (b) stress-strain curves; (c)

201

fracture stress and elastic moduli of different samples.

202

Table 2. Composition of MACNF hydrogels MACNF hydrogels

Water, %

Nanofibers, %

Polymer/Fe3+, %

DS0

73.1%

6.2%

20.7%

DS0.063

72.9%

6.5%

20.6%

11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

DS0.17

71.7%

6.8%

Page 12 of 14

21.5%

203

Conclusion

204

In summary, we used a CNF cake as a reactor to modify CNFs. The reaction between CNFs and

205

MA indicated that this novel modification method was simple but effective. We used the modified

206

CNF cake to prepare nanocomposite hydrogels with reinforced stiffness. The increased stiffness

207

resulted from reinforcing interactions between the nanofibers and polymer matrix. We propose

208

that this PFR method is effective for nanocomposite hydrogels and might also be applicable to

209

other CNF-based functional materials.

210

References

211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242

1. Caccavo, D.; Cascone, S.; Lamberti, G.; Barba, A. A., Hydrogels: experimental characterization and mathematical modelling of their mechanical and diffusive behaviour. Chem Soc Rev 2018, 47 (7), 2357-2373. 2. Wang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, W., Bioinspired fabrication of high strength hydrogels from non-covalent interactions. Progress in Polymer Science 2017, 71, 1-25. 3. Zhang, Y. S.; Khademhosseini, A., Advances in engineering hydrogels. Science 2017, 356 (6337), eaaf3627. 4. Rauner, N.; Meuris, M.; Zoric, M.; Tiller, J. C., Enzymatic mineralization generates ultrastiff and tough hydrogels with tunable mechanics. Nature 2017, 543 (7645), 407-410. 5. Nascimento, D. M.; Nunes, Y. L.; Figueirêdo, M. C. B.; de Azeredo, H. M. C.; Aouada, F. A.; Feitosa, J. P. A.; Rosa, M. F.; Dufresne, A., Nanocellulose nanocomposite hydrogels: technological and environmental issues. Green Chemistry 2018, 20 (11), 2428-2448. 6. De France, K. J.; Hoare, T.; Cranston, E. D., A Review of Hydrogels and Aerogels Containing Nanocellulose. Chemistry of Materials 2017, 29 (11), 4609-4631. 7. Wegst, U. G. K.; Ashby, M. F., The mechanical efficiency of natural materials. Philosophical Magazine 2004, 84 (21), 2167-2186. 8. Abe, K.; Yano, H., Cellulose nanofiber-based hydrogels with high mechanical strength. Cellulose 2012, 19 (6), 1907-1912. 9. Yang, X.; Abe, K.; Biswas, S. K.; Yano, H., Extremely stiff and strong nanocomposite hydrogels with stretchable cellulose nanofiber/poly(vinyl alcohol) networks. Cellulose 2018, 25 (11), 6571-6580. 10. Rol, F.; Belgacem, M. N.; Gandini, A.; Bras, J., Recent advances in surfacemodified cellulose nanofibrils. Progress in Polymer Science 2018, 88, 241-264. 11. Habibi, Y., Key advances in the chemical modification of nanocelluloses. Chem Soc Rev 2014, 43 (5), 1519-1542. 12. Iwamoto, S.; Endo, T., 3 nm Thick Lignocellulose Nanofibers Obtained from Esterified Wood with Maleic Anhydride. ACS Macro Letters 2015, 4 (1), 80-83. 13. Sehaqui, H.; Kulasinski, K.; Pfenninger, N.; Zimmermann, T.; Tingaut, P., Highly Carboxylated Cellulose Nanofibers via Succinic Anhydride Esterification of Wheat Fibers and Facile Mechanical Disintegration. Biomacromolecules 2017, 18 (1), 242-248. 12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 13 of 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

14. Huang, P.; Wu, M.; Kuga, S.; Wang, D.; Wu, D.; Huang, Y., One-step dispersion of cellulose nanofibers by mechanochemical esterification in an organic solvent. ChemSusChem 2012, 5 (12), 2319-2322. 15. Ifuku, S.; Yano, H., Effect of a silane coupling agent on the mechanical properties of a microfibrillated cellulose composite. Int J Biol Macromol 2015, 74, 428-432. 16. Koga, H.; Namba, N.; Takahashi, T.; Nogi, M.; Nishina, Y., Renewable Wood Pulp Paper Reactor with Hierarchical Micro/Nanopores for Continuous-Flow Nanocatalysis. ChemSusChem 2017, 10 (12), 2560-2565. 17. McCormick, C. L.; Dawsey, T. R., Preparation of cellulose derivatives via ringopening reactions with cyclic reagents in lithium chloride/N, N-dimethylacetamide. Macromolecules 1990, 23 (15), 3606-3610. 18. Hu, Y.; Du, Z.; Deng, X.; Wang, T.; Yang, Z.; Zhou, W.; Wang, C., Dual Physically Cross-Linked Hydrogels with High Stretchability, Toughness, and Good SelfRecoverability. Macromolecules 2016, 49 (15), 5660-5668. 19. Lin, P.; Zhang, T.; Wang, X.; Yu, B.; Zhou, F., Freezing Molecular Orientation under Stretch for High Mechanical Strength but Anisotropic Hydrogels. Small 2016, 12 (32), 4386-4392. 20. Abe, K.; Iwamoto, S.; Yano, H., Obtaining cellulose nanofibers with a uniform width of 15 nm from wood. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8 (10), 3276-3278. 21. Kobe, R.; Iwamoto, S.; Endo, T.; Yoshitani, K.; Teramoto, Y., Stretchable composite hydrogels incorporating modified cellulose nanofiber with dispersibility and polymerizability: Mechanical property control and nanofiber orientation. Polymer 2016, 97, 480-486. 22. Segal, L.; Creely, J.; Martin Jr, A.; Conrad, C., An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Textile Research Journal 1959, 29 (10), 786-794. 23. Shimizu, M.; Saito, T.; Isogai, A., Water-resistant and high oxygen-barrier nanocellulose films with interfibrillar cross-linkages formed through multivalent metal ions. Journal of Membrane Science 2016, 500, 1-7. 24. Yang, J.; Xu, F., Synergistic Reinforcing Mechanisms in Cellulose Nanofibrils Composite Hydrogels: Interfacial Dynamics, Energy Dissipation, and Damage Resistance. Biomacromolecules 2017, 18 (8), 2623-2632. 25. Yang, J.; Zhang, X.; Ma, M.; Xu, F., Modulation of Assembly and Dynamics in Colloidal Hydrogels via Ionic Bridge from Cellulose Nanofibrils and Poly(ethylene glycol). ACS Macro Letters 2015, 4 (8), 829-833. 26. Klemm, D.; Kramer, F.; Moritz, S.; Lindstrom, T.; Ankerfors, M.; Gray, D.; Dorris, A., Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2011, 50 (24), 5438-5466. 27. Kontturi, E.; Laaksonen, P.; Linder, M. B.; Nonappa; Groschel, A. H.; Rojas, O. J.; Ikkala, O., Advanced Materials through Assembly of Nanocelluloses. Adv Mater 2018, 30 (24), e1703779.

13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60

285

For Table of Contents Use Only

286 287

Synopsis: A sustainable material, cellulose nanofiber, was quickly modified with a simple

288

procedure and less solvent.

14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 14 of 14