Subscriber access provided by ALBRIGHT COLLEGE
Letter
Stiffened nanocomposite hydrogels by using modified cellulose nanofibers via plug flow reactor method Xianpeng Yang, Subir K. Biswas, Hiroyuki Yano, and Kentaro Abe ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/ acssuschemeng.9b01322 • Publication Date (Web): 30 Apr 2019 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 1, 2019
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
1
Title:
2
Stiffened nanocomposite hydrogels by using modified cellulose nanofibers via plug flow reactor
3
method
4
Authors:
5
Xianpeng Yang†*, Subir K. Biswas†, Hiroyuki Yano†, Kentaro Abe† *
6
†Affiliation: Research Institute for Sustainable Humanosphere, Kyoto University, Gokasho, Uji,
7
Kyoto, 611-0011, Japan
8
*Corresponding author:
9
Xianpeng Yang:
[email protected];
10
Kentaro Abe:
[email protected] 1 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
11
Abstract
12
Cellulose nanofibers (CNFs), hydrophilic natural nanomaterials, are widely used to reinforce the
13
stiffness of hydrogels, which have wet properties similar to those of human tissues. Interactions
14
between the nanofibers and polymer matrix play an important role in reinforcing hydrogels. Here,
15
we used a CNF cake as a reactor to modify the surface of CNFs, which was based on the principle
16
of a plug flow reactor (PFR), excepting to enhance interfacial interactions. As a result, the degree
17
of substitution of maleic acid monoester-modified CNFs reached 0.14 at room temperature within
18
25 min. The crystallinity and morphology of modified CNFs were well maintained. The modified
19
CNFs were used to form composites with poly(acrylamide-co-acrylic acid) networks, followed
20
by ionic cross-linking. The elastic modulus of the nanocomposite hydrogels increased
21
considerably from 10.27 ± 0.48 MPa to 24.67 ± 0.53 MPa after the CNF modification process.
22
This PFR method shows great potential for preparing a range of CNF-based functional
23
nanocomposite materials.
24
Key words: hydrogels, cellulose nanofibers, stiffness, modification, plug flow, engineering
25
approach
2 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 2 of 14
Page 3 of 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
26
Introduction
27
Hydrogels are wet and soft materials, comprising hydrophilic polymer networks, which hold large
28
amounts of water.1 Hydrogels have attracted considerable research attention in recent years owing
29
to their similar wet properties to human tissues.2-3 However, the majority of synthesized hydrogels
30
are softer than human tissues, such as skin, cartilage, and ligament.3-4 Cellulose nanofibers (CNFs)
31
are hydrophilic natural materials, which are extremely stiff and strong and are thus widely used
32
to reinforce hydrogels.5-6 The addition of a small amount of CNFs markedly improves the stiffness
33
of hydrogels; however, the stiffness remains much lower than that of human tissues for three
34
reasons.7 First, the stiffness of CNF networks in wet condition is lost because of disengagement
35
of interfibrillar hydrogen bonds. Second, it is difficult to increase the CNF content owing to the
36
high viscosity. Third, physical interactions between CNFs and the polymer matrix are weak under
37
wet conditions. We recently reported on stiff hydrogels with a high CNF content formed by
38
filtering a CNF suspension to form a wet cake.8-9 Modification of the surface of CNFs represents
39
another way to introduce covalent or non-covalent bonds between nanofibers and polymer matrix
40
to give stiffer hydrogels.5-6
41
Although CNFs, which are made up cellulose, are amenable to a range of modifications,10-11 it
42
remains difficult to develop a simple and efficient method to modify the surface of CNFs.
43
Modification processes typically require the CNFs to be present at low concentrations, which
44
limits the reaction efficiency and increases solvent consumption. Furthermore, pre-treatment and
45
post-treatment by solvent-exchange are required, making the modification process tedious and
46
environmentally unfriendly.10 Additionally, under severe reaction conditions, the crystallinity
47
and/or morphology of CNFs might change.10 On the other hand, the difficulties of CNF
48
modification can be addressed through engineering approaches rather than chemistry alone. For
49
example, chemical modification is performed before nanofabrication to reduce energy
50
consumption.12-13 New groups have also been induced during nanofabrication by ball milling or
3 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
51
with the use of nanocellulose sheets.14-15
52
Here, we report a new CNF modification method, inspired by the fluid in a plug flow reactor
53
(PFR). The fluid in the PFR is not mixed in the axial direction and thus no back-mixing occurs.
54
Similarly, filtering a CNF suspension results in a wet CNF cake where nanochannels form with a
55
large aspect ratio.16 Fluid moves through the nanochannels under the force of a vacuum may show
56
negligible back-mixing phenomenon. The water in the CNF cake can be readily replaced by a
57
mixture of solvent and reactant. At the same time, the reaction between the CNFs and reactant
58
mixture occurs and the surface of CNFs is modified. We examined the reaction of CNFs and
59
maleic anhydride (MA) using a CNF cake as reactor.17 Notably, Fe3+-cross-linked
60
poly(acrylamide-co-acrylic acid) [poly(AM-co-AA)] is widely used to prepare tough
61
hydrogels.18-19 We used the maleic acid monoester modified CNFs (MACNFs) to form composites
62
with poly(AM-co-AA), followed by ionic cross-linking. Here, the MACNFs, containing double
63
bonds and carboxyl groups, were grafted through poly(AM-co-AA) chains and ionically cross-
64
linked with AA units, which improved interactions between the nanofibers and matrix. We
65
performed tensile testing to compare the mechanical properties of the nanocomposite hydrogels
66
reinforced by modified CNFs having different degree of substitution (DS).
67
Experimental section
68
All the chemicals were laboratory grade and used as received. The CNFs were prepared according
69
to our previously reported method.9, 20 The MACNF cake was prepared using the PFR method. In
70
a typical procedure (Entry 4, Table 1), a total of 200 mL of CNF suspension (0.1 wt%) was
71
vacuum filtered to form a wet CNF cake with a water content of approximately 90 wt%. A mixed
72
solution, containing 1.16 g of MA, 1.6 mL of triethylamine (TEA), and 30 mL of
73
dimethylacetamide (DMAc), was filtered through the cake. Then, 10 mL of ethanol and 50 mL
74
of water were filtered through the cake in turn to obtain the purified MACNF cake. In the whole
75
process, the degree of vacuum, produced by a circulating water aspirator, was kept constant at 2.5 4 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 4 of 14
Page 5 of 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
76
kPa.
77
The resulting MACNF cake was immersed in a mixture containing the monomers (AM and AA),
78
the initiator (ammonium persulphate, APS), and the cross-linker (N,N’-methylenebisacrylamide,
79
MBA). The concentration of AM and AA was fixed at 2 and 0.3 mol/L corresponding to the
80
volume of water. The moles of APS and MBA were fixed to be 0.001 times the monomer content.
81
After immersion at 4 °C for 24 h, the cake was fixed between two glass slides and sealed with a
82
silica cushion. The polymerization was performed at 80 °C for 12 h to form the poly(AM-co-AA)
83
networks. The polymerized cake was immersed in FeCl3 aqueous solution (0.06 M) for 24 h to
84
ionically cross-link the poly(AM-co-AA) network. Finally, the ionically cross-linked hydrogel
85
was immersed in a large amount of water to remove excess FeCl3 and reach an equilibrium state,
86
resulting in MACNF hydrogels. The composition of the MACNF hydrogels was tested by weight
87
method. The MACNF hydrogels were named as DSn according to the DS of the used nanofibers.
88
For example, DS0.063 means that the MACNF hydrogel was prepared from the MACNFs with a
89
DS of 0.063. DS0 means that the hydrogel was prepared from the CNFs without modification.
90
The DS of MACNFs was measured by a titration method.21 Simply, a MACNF suspension (20 g,
91
0.05 wt%) was neutralized with NaOH aqueous (0.02 M), which was repeated twice. Fourier
92
transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were recorded on a Spectrum Two spectrometer (PerkinElmer
93
Inc., Waltham, MA) in the range of 400–4000 cm−1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were
94
performed with CuKα radiation (40 kV and 300 mA) from 5° to 40° in reflection mode.9 The
95
SEM images were obtained at an acceleration voltage of 1.5 kV. Samples were dried at room
96
temperature overnight and at 110 °C for 10 min, and then coated with platinum by sputtering for
97
90 s.9 For thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), dried samples of 5-mg weight were heated under a
98
nitrogen atmosphere from 110 °C to 600 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1.9 The tensile testing
99
was performed at a stretch velocity 20 mm·min−1 using dumbbell-shaped samples (width: 2 mm,
100
length: 35 mm, gauge length: 20 mm). Five specimens were tested for each sample.9
5 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
101
Results and discussions
102
Modification of CNFs via PFR method
103
First, a CNF suspension (200 ml, 0.1 wt%) was filtered to form a CNF cake where there exist
104
nanochannels (Fig. 1a).16 The nanochannels had a large aspect ratio because the thickness of the
105
CNF cake was about 0.5 mm, much larger than the diameter of nanochannels (tens of nanometers).
106
Therefore, the flow in the nanochannels under the force of vacuum might show negligible back-
107
mixing phenomenon (Fig. 1b). Then, a reactant mixture containing MA, TEA as the activator/H+
108
scavenger,17 and DMAc as the solvent was passed through the CNF cake. It was assumed that the
109
water in the CNF cake was replaced by the reactant mixture gradually ( I to III, Fig. 1c). At same
110
time, the reaction between the surface of CNFs and MA occurred (Fig. 1d). After the reaction, the
111
cake was washed by passing ethanol and water through the cake. The translucent CNF cake
112
became much more transparent after modification (Fig. 1a), owing to the negative charge of the
113
maleic acid monoester.21 Fig. 1e illustrates how the concentration of nanofibers changed in
114
preparation of MACNF cake by using the PFR method and the conventional solvent exchange
115
(SE) method. For PFR method, pre-treatment process was not required and the concentration of
116
nanofibers almost kept constant after filtering a CNF suspension. In addition, the reaction was
117
performed at high concentration and the purification process was also simplified. In contrast, the
118
SE method was more tedious and less effective.
6 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 6 of 14
Page 7 of 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
119 120
Fig. 1. PFR inspired modification of CNFs. (a) Illustration of the modification process: CNF suspension
121
was vacuum filtered and the reactant solution was passed through the wet CNF cake. (b) Model of PFR: no
122
back-mixing occurs in the axial direction. (c) Fluid and reactions in the CNF cake. Orange dashed arrows
123
show the path of the reactant. Blue dashed arrows show ethanol. I to III: water was gradually replaced by
124
the reactant mixture; III to V: the reactant mixture was gradually replaced by ethanol. (d) Reaction between
125
CNFs and MA. (e) Concentration of nanofibers during different steps. Step I: pre-treatment. Several times
126
of solvent exchange are required for SE method. Step Ⅱ: reaction. Step III: purification. Several times of
127
solvent exchange are required for SE method. Step Ⅳ: preparation of MACNF cake. SE method was
128
described according to reported process.21
129
Fig. 2a shows the normalized FTIR spectra of CNFs and MACNFs, confirming the successful
130
modification. Absorption peaks of the maleic acid monoester group attached to CNFs appeared
131
at 1722, 1637, 1578 and 1423 cm−1. We attributed the peak at 1722 cm−1 to stretching vibrations
132
of the C=O groups in the ester linkage and the peaks at 1578 and 1423 cm−1 to carboxylate groups
133
with a conjugated form.13, 21 We assigned the peak at 1637 cm−1 to characteristic C=C stretching
134
vibrations. Within 25 min at room temperature, the DS reached 0.14 (Table 1, No. 4), indicating
135
that the modification was effective. The DS was controlled by changing the volume and/or
136
composition of reactant solution (Table 1). The volume of solvent had a more pronounced effect
7 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 8 of 14
137
on the DS than did the concentration of MA, indicating that residence time was the controlling
138
factor. A lower vacuum force also prolongs the residence time, which may result in a higher DS
139
for the same reactant mixture.
140
Table 1. Composition of reactant mixtures and corresponding DS of MACNFs. Reactant mixture Entry
DS of MACNFs MA/g
TEA/mL
DMAc/mL
1
0.29
0.4
15
0.045
2
0.29
0.4
20
0.054
3
1.16
1.6
20
0.073
4
1.16
1.6
30
0.14
141
The XRD spectra in Fig. 2b show that both the CNFs and MACNFs had cellulose I crystal
142
structures. Unlike CNF modification processes performed under more severe conditions, no
143
broadening of the CNF peaks was observed in our case.21 The crystallinity index (CrI), calculated
144
by the Segal method,22 increased from 63.2% to 68.4% as the DS of MACNFs increased from 0
145
to 0.17 (Fig. 2b). Furthermore, the MACNFs and CNFs shared a 15–40-nm diameter and a length
146
of several micrometers (Fig. 3). The MACNFs showed the more distinct appearance than that of
147
CNFs. We suggest that the changes of crystallinity and appearance occurred through partial
148
degradation of amorphous regions. The mild conditions had minor effects on both the crystallinity
149
and morphology. In terms of thermal stability, as the DS increased to 0.17, the initial
150
decomposition temperature (i.e., the 5%-degradation temperature) of the MACNFs decreased to
151
229.8 °C, which was lower than that of the CNFs (257.5 °C). This decrease might be attributed
152
to the larger surface areas and the presence of less stable carboxyl groups in the MACNFs.10, 13
153
To illustrate the versatility of current method, we performed modifications with various other
154
kinds of groups. The current method is applicable for different types of modifications in both
155
organic solvents and aqueous conditions. We will build mathematical models of CNF cake-based 8 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 9 of 14
156
reactor and report in another paper. We expect that other nanocelluloses, including cellulose
157
nanocrystals and bacterial cellulose might be modified based on this wet cake reactor principle. (a)
1722
1578
(b)
1423
200
CNFs MACNFs
1800
1700
1600
1500
Intensity
Absorbance
1637
1400
CNFs MACNFs
CrI=68.4% CrI=63.2%
4000
3200
2400 1600 Wavelength (cm-1)
800
(c)100
10
15
20 25 2 [deg.]
30
35
(d)1.5
CNFs MACNFs
60 40 20
40
CNFs MACNFs
1.2
80
0 100
158
5
Deriv. (%/oC)
Mass remaining (%)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
0.9 0.6 0.3 0.0
200
300
400
500
600
Temperature (oC)
200
300
400
500
600
Temperature (oC)
159
Fig. 2. (a). FT-IR spectra of CNFs and MACNFs. (b). XRD spectra of CNFs and MACNFs.
160
Thermogravimetric analysis of CNFs and MACNFs: integral curves (c); differential curves (d).
161 162
Fig. 3. SEM images of CNFs (a) and MACNFs (b).
163
Stiffened nanocomposite hydrogels
164
We applied our MACNF cake to prepare nanocomposite hydrogels, which we expected to
165
improve the stiffness of the resulting composite. As shown in Fig. 4a, after modification and
166
purification, the MACNF cake was immersed in monomer solution containing 2 mol/L of AM,
9 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
167
0.3 mol/L of AA and a small amount of covalent cross-linker and initiator. Poly(AM-co-AA)
168
networks were formed after polymerization (Fig. 4a-2). MACNFs could be grafted through
169
poly(AM-co-AA) chains, through double bonds on the maleic acid ester groups. Then, the
170
carboxyl groups on the acrylic acid groups of poly(AM-co-AA) and the surface of MACNFs were
171
further cross-linked by Fe3+. Finally, the resulting hydrogels were immersed in water until
172
equilibrium to form MACNF hydrogels (Fig. 4a-3). Three samples of MACNF hydrogels were
173
prepared by using the nanofibers with different DS, as shown in Table 2. DS0.063 and DS0 had
174
almost the same compositions while DS0.17 showed a little decrease in water content. When
175
slightly modified MACNFs (DS = 0.063) were used, the elastic modulus increased from 10.27 to
176
17.53 MPa and the fracture stress increased from 6.08 to 7.32 MPa, compared with that of the
177
DS0 hydrogels (Fig. 4b-c). When the DS of the MACNFs reached 0.17, the stiffness and strength
178
increased to 24.67 and 7.68 MPa, respectively. Considering that the samples possessed very
179
similar compositions, the differences of the interactions between the nanofibers and matrix might
180
be the main reason for the increasement of elastic modus and fracture strength. For DS0 sample,
181
the layered CNFs were firmly surrounded by tough polymer matrix which might enable the
182
orientation of nanofibers. As a result, the elongation was relatively high. However, the main
183
interactions between CNFs and matrix were hydrogen bonds and entanglements, which were
184
relatively weak. For DS0.063 and DS0.17 samples, covalent and ionic bonds were introduced
185
between nanofibers and matrix. The additional cross-linking enhanced the friction force between
186
nanofibers and matrix, resulting in increased modulus and strength. The decreased elongation of
187
MACNF hydrogels probably arose from the rigidity of additional ionic cross-linking,23 which
188
restrained the orientation of nanofibers.
189
We previously reported that a high CNF content, formed by filtering a CNF suspension to form a
190
wet cake, facilitates the improvement of stiffness.8-9 Here, we conclude that generating strong
191
interactions between the nanofibers and polymer matrix is also essential for preparing stiff
192
hydrogels. Although the importance of interfacial interactions has received considerable 10 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 14
Page 11 of 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
193
attention,24-25 extremely stiff hydrogels have rarely been achieved with CNF reinforcement, as
194
analyzed in the Introduction section. In the next work, we will study on the role of covalent and
195
ionic bonds separately by different modification of CNFs. In addition, the use of a wet nanofiber
196
cake as a reactor represents a simple and versatile method for modifying CNFs with various kinds
197
of groups. We predict that our PFR method will be applicable to other CNF-based functional
198
materials, such nanopapers and aerogels.26-27
199 200
Fig. 4. (a) Preparation and structure of MACNF hydrogels. Tensile properties: (b) stress-strain curves; (c)
201
fracture stress and elastic moduli of different samples.
202
Table 2. Composition of MACNF hydrogels MACNF hydrogels
Water, %
Nanofibers, %
Polymer/Fe3+, %
DS0
73.1%
6.2%
20.7%
DS0.063
72.9%
6.5%
20.6%
11 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
DS0.17
71.7%
6.8%
Page 12 of 14
21.5%
203
Conclusion
204
In summary, we used a CNF cake as a reactor to modify CNFs. The reaction between CNFs and
205
MA indicated that this novel modification method was simple but effective. We used the modified
206
CNF cake to prepare nanocomposite hydrogels with reinforced stiffness. The increased stiffness
207
resulted from reinforcing interactions between the nanofibers and polymer matrix. We propose
208
that this PFR method is effective for nanocomposite hydrogels and might also be applicable to
209
other CNF-based functional materials.
210
References
211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242
1. Caccavo, D.; Cascone, S.; Lamberti, G.; Barba, A. A., Hydrogels: experimental characterization and mathematical modelling of their mechanical and diffusive behaviour. Chem Soc Rev 2018, 47 (7), 2357-2373. 2. Wang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, W., Bioinspired fabrication of high strength hydrogels from non-covalent interactions. Progress in Polymer Science 2017, 71, 1-25. 3. Zhang, Y. S.; Khademhosseini, A., Advances in engineering hydrogels. Science 2017, 356 (6337), eaaf3627. 4. Rauner, N.; Meuris, M.; Zoric, M.; Tiller, J. C., Enzymatic mineralization generates ultrastiff and tough hydrogels with tunable mechanics. Nature 2017, 543 (7645), 407-410. 5. Nascimento, D. M.; Nunes, Y. L.; Figueirêdo, M. C. B.; de Azeredo, H. M. C.; Aouada, F. A.; Feitosa, J. P. A.; Rosa, M. F.; Dufresne, A., Nanocellulose nanocomposite hydrogels: technological and environmental issues. Green Chemistry 2018, 20 (11), 2428-2448. 6. De France, K. J.; Hoare, T.; Cranston, E. D., A Review of Hydrogels and Aerogels Containing Nanocellulose. Chemistry of Materials 2017, 29 (11), 4609-4631. 7. Wegst, U. G. K.; Ashby, M. F., The mechanical efficiency of natural materials. Philosophical Magazine 2004, 84 (21), 2167-2186. 8. Abe, K.; Yano, H., Cellulose nanofiber-based hydrogels with high mechanical strength. Cellulose 2012, 19 (6), 1907-1912. 9. Yang, X.; Abe, K.; Biswas, S. K.; Yano, H., Extremely stiff and strong nanocomposite hydrogels with stretchable cellulose nanofiber/poly(vinyl alcohol) networks. Cellulose 2018, 25 (11), 6571-6580. 10. Rol, F.; Belgacem, M. N.; Gandini, A.; Bras, J., Recent advances in surfacemodified cellulose nanofibrils. Progress in Polymer Science 2018, 88, 241-264. 11. Habibi, Y., Key advances in the chemical modification of nanocelluloses. Chem Soc Rev 2014, 43 (5), 1519-1542. 12. Iwamoto, S.; Endo, T., 3 nm Thick Lignocellulose Nanofibers Obtained from Esterified Wood with Maleic Anhydride. ACS Macro Letters 2015, 4 (1), 80-83. 13. Sehaqui, H.; Kulasinski, K.; Pfenninger, N.; Zimmermann, T.; Tingaut, P., Highly Carboxylated Cellulose Nanofibers via Succinic Anhydride Esterification of Wheat Fibers and Facile Mechanical Disintegration. Biomacromolecules 2017, 18 (1), 242-248. 12 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 13 of 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
14. Huang, P.; Wu, M.; Kuga, S.; Wang, D.; Wu, D.; Huang, Y., One-step dispersion of cellulose nanofibers by mechanochemical esterification in an organic solvent. ChemSusChem 2012, 5 (12), 2319-2322. 15. Ifuku, S.; Yano, H., Effect of a silane coupling agent on the mechanical properties of a microfibrillated cellulose composite. Int J Biol Macromol 2015, 74, 428-432. 16. Koga, H.; Namba, N.; Takahashi, T.; Nogi, M.; Nishina, Y., Renewable Wood Pulp Paper Reactor with Hierarchical Micro/Nanopores for Continuous-Flow Nanocatalysis. ChemSusChem 2017, 10 (12), 2560-2565. 17. McCormick, C. L.; Dawsey, T. R., Preparation of cellulose derivatives via ringopening reactions with cyclic reagents in lithium chloride/N, N-dimethylacetamide. Macromolecules 1990, 23 (15), 3606-3610. 18. Hu, Y.; Du, Z.; Deng, X.; Wang, T.; Yang, Z.; Zhou, W.; Wang, C., Dual Physically Cross-Linked Hydrogels with High Stretchability, Toughness, and Good SelfRecoverability. Macromolecules 2016, 49 (15), 5660-5668. 19. Lin, P.; Zhang, T.; Wang, X.; Yu, B.; Zhou, F., Freezing Molecular Orientation under Stretch for High Mechanical Strength but Anisotropic Hydrogels. Small 2016, 12 (32), 4386-4392. 20. Abe, K.; Iwamoto, S.; Yano, H., Obtaining cellulose nanofibers with a uniform width of 15 nm from wood. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8 (10), 3276-3278. 21. Kobe, R.; Iwamoto, S.; Endo, T.; Yoshitani, K.; Teramoto, Y., Stretchable composite hydrogels incorporating modified cellulose nanofiber with dispersibility and polymerizability: Mechanical property control and nanofiber orientation. Polymer 2016, 97, 480-486. 22. Segal, L.; Creely, J.; Martin Jr, A.; Conrad, C., An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Textile Research Journal 1959, 29 (10), 786-794. 23. Shimizu, M.; Saito, T.; Isogai, A., Water-resistant and high oxygen-barrier nanocellulose films with interfibrillar cross-linkages formed through multivalent metal ions. Journal of Membrane Science 2016, 500, 1-7. 24. Yang, J.; Xu, F., Synergistic Reinforcing Mechanisms in Cellulose Nanofibrils Composite Hydrogels: Interfacial Dynamics, Energy Dissipation, and Damage Resistance. Biomacromolecules 2017, 18 (8), 2623-2632. 25. Yang, J.; Zhang, X.; Ma, M.; Xu, F., Modulation of Assembly and Dynamics in Colloidal Hydrogels via Ionic Bridge from Cellulose Nanofibrils and Poly(ethylene glycol). ACS Macro Letters 2015, 4 (8), 829-833. 26. Klemm, D.; Kramer, F.; Moritz, S.; Lindstrom, T.; Ankerfors, M.; Gray, D.; Dorris, A., Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2011, 50 (24), 5438-5466. 27. Kontturi, E.; Laaksonen, P.; Linder, M. B.; Nonappa; Groschel, A. H.; Rojas, O. J.; Ikkala, O., Advanced Materials through Assembly of Nanocelluloses. Adv Mater 2018, 30 (24), e1703779.
13 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
285
For Table of Contents Use Only
286 287
Synopsis: A sustainable material, cellulose nanofiber, was quickly modified with a simple
288
procedure and less solvent.
14 ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 14 of 14