Substrate Specificity Combined with Stereopromiscuity in Glutathione

Jan 19, 2010 - Abbreviations: HNE, 4-hydroxynonenal; GST, glutathione transferase; GSH, glutathione; GSHNE, glutathionyl 4-hydroxynonanal; GSDHN, ...
0 downloads 0 Views 4MB Size
Download PDF
Biochemistry 2010, 49, 1541–1548 1541 DOI: 10.1021/bi902038u

Substrate Specificity Combined with Stereopromiscuity in Glutathione Transferase A4-4-Dependent Metabolism of 4-Hydroxynonenal† )

)

Larissa M. Balogh,‡ Isolde Le Trong,§ Kimberly A. Kripps,‡ Laura M. Shireman,‡ Ronald E. Stenkamp,§ Wei Zhang, Bengt Mannervik, and William M. Atkins*,‡ Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Box 357610, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, §Department of Biological Structure, Biomolecular Structure Center, Box 357420, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, and Department of Biochemistry and Organic Chemistry, Uppsala University, Biomedical Center, Box 576, SE-751 23 Uppsala, Sweden )

‡

Received November 29, 2009; Revised Manuscript Received January 18, 2010 ABSTRACT: Conjugation to glutathione (GSH) by glutathione transferase A4-4 (GSTA4-4) is a major route of elimination for the lipid peroxidation product 4-hydroxynonenal (HNE), a toxic compound that contributes to numerous diseases. Both enantiomers of HNE are presumed to be toxic, and GSTA4-4 has negligible stereoselectivity toward them, despite its high catalytic chemospecificity for alkenals. In contrast to the highly flexible, and substrate promiscuous, GSTA1-1 isoform that has poor catalytic efficiency with HNE, GSTA4-4 has been postulated to be a rigid template that is preorganized for HNE metabolism. However, the combination of high substrate chemoselectivity and low substrate stereoselectivity is intriguing. The mechanism by which GSTA4-4 achieves this combination is important, because it must metabolize both enantiomers of HNE to efficiently detoxify the biologically formed mixture. The crystal structures of GSTA4-4 and an engineered variant of GSTA1-1 with high catalytic efficiency toward HNE, cocrystallized with a GSH-HNE conjugate analogue, demonstrate that GSTA4-4 undergoes no enantiospecific induced fit; instead, the active site residue Arg15 is ideally located to interact with the 4-hydroxyl group of either HNE enantiomer. The results reveal an evolutionary strategy for achieving biologically useful stereopromiscuity toward a toxic racemate, concomitant with high catalytic efficiency and substrate specificity toward an endogenously formed toxin.

4-Hydroxynonenal (HNE)1 is a major lipid peroxidation product of oxidative stress, and it plays a causal role in several neurodegenerative diseases, including diabetes, atherosclerosis, asthma, cataracts, cancer, and aging (1-4). HNE is an electrophilic toxin, formed as a racemic mixture from arachidonic acid or linoleic acid, which covalently modifies numerous proteins and DNA (5). HNE also acts as a second messenger in signal transduction pathways related to apoptosis (6, 7). Cellular processes that control HNE concentrations likely influence susceptibility to toxic effects of oxidative stress and related diseases (8). Hypothetically, metabolic processes that evolved to clear HNE would, individually or collectively, eliminate both 4R-HNE and 4S-HNE, because although stereoselective interactions occur, both enantiomers are chemically reactive toward cellular macromolecules (9-11). Interestingly, any individual enzyme that evolved to eliminate HNE would need to uncouple substrate chemospecificity from substrate stereoselectivity to provide an efficient detoxification pathway. This is a fascinating challenge for an enzyme, to the extent that substrate chemospecificity is presumed to coevolve with catalytic efficiency; evolutionary steps that enhance interactions with the diastereomeric transition state formed from one HNE enantiomer would † This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants GM62284 and GM32165 and the Swedish Research Council. *To whom correspondence should be addressed. Telephone: (206) 685-0379. Fax: (206) 685-3252. E-mail: [email protected]. 1 Abbreviations: HNE, 4-hydroxynonenal; GST, glutathione transferase; GSH, glutathione; GSHNE, glutathionyl 4-hydroxynonanal; GSDHN, glutathionyl 1,4-dihydroxynonanol; MR, molecular replacement; PDB, Protein Data Bank; rmsd, root-mean-square deviation.

disfavor interactions with the diastereomeric transition state derived from the other HNE enantiomer. The structural basis for this behavior with enzymes that recognize HNE has not been determined. A major route of HNE elimination is glutathione transferase (GST)-catalyzed adduction to glutathione (GSH) to form the diastereomeric 3S-glutathionyl 4-hydroxynonanal (3S-GSHNE) conjugates (Figure 1). The GSTA4-4 isoform exhibits remarkable chemoselectivity and high catalytic efficiency toward HNE (12-15), and expression of GSTA4-4 is a critical determinant of an organism’s susceptibility to disease and aging. In contrast, the structural homologue GSTA1-1 is an archetypal, substrate promiscuous, detoxification enzyme with a 50-fold lower kcat/Km for HNE compared to that of GSTA4-4 (16). Whereas many crystallographic structures of GSTA1-1 reveal binding interactions with different ligands (17-22), very few structures are available for GSTA4-4, and none include HNE or a GSH-HNE conjugate relevant to the ternary substrate complex (13, 23). Thus, the structural basis for the specificity of GSTA4-4 for HNE is not completely understood. However, rationally engineered mutants of GSTA1-1, including the GSTA1-1 “GIMFhelix” mutant that contains 14 amino acid substitutions (6% of the sequence), have implicated structural elements that contribute; the GIMFhelix mutant is dramatically more active toward HNE than GSTA1-1, but still less efficient than GSTA4-4 (24). The GIMFhelix protein has served as a valuable model for the possible evolution of the HNE specificity of GSTA4-4 from the promiscuous GSTA1-1 (24-27). Although low-amplitude, fast, dynamics are a clear necessity for effective

r 2010 American Chemical Society

Published on Web 01/19/2010

pubs.acs.org/Biochemistry

1542

Biochemistry, Vol. 49, No. 7, 2010

Balogh et al.

FIGURE 1: Reaction of racemic HNE with GSH. 1,4-Addition reaction of HNE with GSH as catalyzed by human GSTA4-4, followed by intramolecular cyclization or reduction by NaBH4.

enzyme catalysis, the available data suggest that GSTA1-1 utilizes the induced fit of a conformationally flexible scaffold to achieve promiscuous catalysis, whereas GSTA4-4 is a relatively rigid preformed template poised to bind and conjugate the lipid aldehyde HNE. The stereochemical course of the GSTA4-4 reaction with HNE is paradoxical because it exhibits negligible substrate stereoselectivity, accepting either 4R- or 4S-HNE, but it is completely stereoselective at the level of product formation, allowing attack of GSH from only the si face of the prochiral carbon 3 of HNE (28) (Figure 1). Thus, each enantiomeric HNE is efficiently cleared by GSTA4-4, as expected for an enzyme that may have evolved to eliminate a toxic racemic mixture. The difference in the kinetic parameters between nonenal and HNE suggests that the HNE hydroxyl group is exploited within the GSTA4-4 active site (24, 29). However, while the protein flexibility found with GSTA1-1 is easily rationalized as a device for achieving substrate promiscuity, including stereochemical aspects, it is unclear how the presumed rigid scaffold of GSTA4-4 achieves high substrate specificity without stereoselectivity, if it does not rearrange to accommodate stereoisomeric substrates. The striking lack of substrate stereoselectivity for HNE could, hypothetically, be due to (1) a symmetrically placed active site group that interacts with the 4-hydroxyl group in either configuration to yield diastereomeric transition states of equal energy or (2) two distinct active site groups that each form diastereospecific interactions with the 4-hydroxy group in one of the diastereomeric, energetically degenerate, transition states. To understand the structural basis for the high substrate specificity of GSTA4-4 for HNE, coupled with the biologically useful substrate stereopromiscuity, we determined the structures of human GSTA4-4 and the GIMFhelix mutant in a complex with the open chain form of the 3S-GSHNE conjugate, 3S-glutathionyl 1,4-dihydroxynonanol (3S-GSDHN). The structures are the first ones of GSTA4-4 in a complex with a biologically relevant ligand that reveals how conformational dynamics of the C-terminus have been completely remodeled to accommodate endogenous alkenal substrates in GSTA4-4 compared to GSTA1-1, and they provide a structural rationalization for the biologically optimal combination of high substrate specificity and catalytic efficiency for racemic HNE without substrate stereoselectivity. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES Protein Expression and Purification. Recombinant human GSTA4-4, GSTA1-1, GSTA4-4 Y9F, and GSTA1-1 GIMFhelix were expressed in Escherichia coli and purified via GSH-agarose

affinity chromatography as described previously (12, 24) with an additional purification step using a Sephadex G-75 column washed with 10 mM NaPO4 (pH 6.9) and 2 mM EDTA, prior to exchange into 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.0) for crystallization screens. Stereoselectivity Analysis. GSH was preincubated with GSTA4-4, GSTA1-1, GSTA4-4 Y9F, GSTA1-1 GIMFhelix, or buffer alone, followed by reaction with racemic HNE. Diastereomer formation was analyzed by liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry (LC-MS) as described previously (28). Enzyme Kinetics. The metabolism of racemic HNE (0160 μM) by GSTA4-4 Y9F (58 nM) was monitored by a LC-MS product formation activity assay that allows for the concurrent detection of the GSHNE diastereomers derived from S- and R-HNE. The activity assay, preparation and quantification of the GSHNE standards, and LC-MS analyses were performed using previously described methods (28). The apparent catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) of the GSTA1-1 GIMFhelix mutant (600 pM) was also determined for comparison using the product formation assay with replicates conducted at [HNE] , Km. Reduction of GSHNE by NaBH4. The diastereomeric 3S-GSHNE conjugates were prepared via incubation of GSTA4-4 with GSH and racemic HNE to provide the uncyclized and stereochemically relevant 3S-conjugate. 3S-GSHNE was then reduced by NaBH4, and 3S-GSDHN was purified by HPLC and characterized by LC-MS and NMR as described previously (28). Crystallization and X-ray Diffraction Data Collection. Crystallization screens were conducted using the sitting drop vapor diffusion method at room temperature with conditions based on published protocols (13, 19, 23) as well as using the Hampton crystallization screen kits, HR2-110 and HR2-112, with protein concentrations of 10 mg/mL in 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.0). Data sets were collected for samples crystallized from (i) 2 μL of GSTA4-4 with a 10-fold molar excess of 3S-GSDHN per subunit mixed with 2 μL of reservoir solution containing 24% PEG 4000, 0.1 M sodium acetate trihydrate (pH 4.6), and 0.2 M ammonium sulfate and (ii) 2 μL of GSTA1-1 GIMFhelix with a 10-fold molar excess of 3S-GSDHN per subunit and 0.5 μL of EtOH mixed with 3 μL of reservoir solution containing 16% PEG mme 5000, 0.1 M HEPES (pH 7.5), and 10% isopropyl alcohol. Paraffin oil was used as a cryoprotectant in the case of the 3SGSDHN-GSTA1-1 GIMFhelix complex, and diffraction data were collected at SSRL beamline 11-1 (λ = 0.9795) and processed with HKL2000 (30). Data collection and processing statistics are presented in Table 1.

Article

Biochemistry, Vol. 49, No. 7, 2010

1543

Table 1: Data Collection and Processing Statistics

space group unit cell dimensions resolution limit (A˚) no. of reflections completeness (%) redundancy Rmergea ÆIæ/Æσ(I)æ P P a Rmerge = |(I - ÆIæ)|/ I.

GSTA4-4-GSDHN

GIMFhelix-GSDHN

P21 59.02 A˚, 153.04 A˚, 60.83 A˚, 90.0, 103.1, 90.0 1.90 79642 96.7 4.7 0.129 11.8

P21 95.88 A˚, 114.65 A˚, 96.23 A˚, 90.0, 117.7, 90.0 2.10 97225 89.6 4.5 0.107 12.7

Table 2: Model and Refinement Statistics GSTA4-4-GSDHN

GIMFhelix-GSDHN

PDB entry 3IK7 3IK9 resolution limit (A˚) 1.97 2.20 R valuea 0.21 0.23 Rfreeb 0.25 0.28 rmsd for bonds (A˚) 0.012 0.011 rmsd for angles (deg) 1.33 1.30 no. of atoms protein 7178 14241 solvent 208 59 other 129 248 average B value (A˚2) protein 39.2 45.2 solvent 36.0 28.8 ligand 51.1 46.2 P P a b R = ||Fo| - |Fc||/ |Fo|. Rfree is R over the 5% of the data not included in the model refinement.

Molecular Replacement and Refinement. The 3SGSDHN-GSTA4-4 and 3S-GSDHN-GSTA1-1 GIMFhelix crystal structures were determined using Phaser (31) and the molecular replacement (MR) pipeline, BALBES (32), respectively, with GSTA4-4 and GSTA1-1 structures (PDB entries 1GUL and 1K3Y, respectively) selected as the search models. The MR solutions were used to build models that were refined with REFMAC5 (33) in the CCP4 program suite (34) using rigid body refinement followed by restrained refinement. Entire models were checked and adjusted in Xfit (35) after each cycle of refinement, and the 3S,4R-GSDHN ligands as well as water molecules were fit to the difference density. The structures were evaluated with Molprobity (36). Coordinates for the GSDHNGSTA4-4 and GSDHN-GSTA1-1 GIMFhelix models have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank as entries 3IK7 and 3IK9, respectively. Refinement and model statistics are presented in Table 2. RESULTS Stereoselectivity of Product Formation. The stereoselectivities of GSTA4-4 and GSTA1-1 were compared with that of the GIMFhelix mutant using LC-MS. While all four diastereomeric products are generated in approximately equal amounts by the nonenzymatic reaction of racemic HNE with GSH, the 3S,4R-GSHNE and 3S,4S-GSHNE diastereomers are stereoselectively derived from the GSTA4-4-catalyzed reaction (28). Shown in Figure 2 are results acquired with the GIMFhelix mutant, which indicate that, although it is more product stereoselective than wild-type GSTA1-1 with regard to the chirality at C3 in the product, it is less product stereoselective than wild-type

FIGURE 2: Comparison of stereoselectivity of product formation. The GSHNE diastereomers were prepared by incubation of GSH and (A) buffer alone, (B) GSTA4-4, (C) GSTA1-1 GIMFhelix, or (D) GSTA1-1, with racemic HNE, and analyzed by LC-MS (ESIþ, m/z 464). The corresponding spontaneous reaction (gray line) is also shown for the sake of comparison.

GSTA4-4. Whereas these experiments indicate that the product stereoselectivity of the GIMFhelix mutant is different from that of GSTA4-4, enzymatic activity assays indicate that the GIMFhelix mutant is not less substrate stereoselective than GSTA4-4. On the basis of the ratio of the apparent catalytic efficiencies (kcat/Km), the GIMFhelix mutant exhibits a preference for

1544

Biochemistry, Vol. 49, No. 7, 2010

Balogh et al.

FIGURE 3: Overall structure of human GSTA4-4 in complex with 3S,4R-GSDHN (PDB entry 3IK7). The views are aligned perpendicular to the 2-fold axis of symmetry for the dimer. (A) Structure emphasizing the active site region within one subunit (β-strands colored cyan, R-helices colored gray, except for the C-terminal and R4-R5 tower regions, which are highlighted in orange throughout all figures). (B) Semitransparent view of the dimer.

S-HNE versus R-HNE of 1.6, compared to that of 1.5 previously reported for hGSTA4-4 (28). Overall Structure and Model Quality. The 3S-GSDHNbound human GSTA4-4 and GIMFhelix structures were determined at 1.97 and 2.20 A˚, respectively. The final model of the GSTA4-4 complex is composed of two dimers in the asymmetric unit, with a 3S-GSDHN molecule bound to each of the four corresponding active sites. Crystals of the GIMFhelix complex have four dimers in the asymmetric unit, with a 3S-GSDHN molecule bound to each of the eight corresponding actives sites. Each subunit exhibits the canonical GST fold consisting of the βRβRββR motif in the N-terminal domain that yields the highly conserved GSH binding site (G-site) followed by the C-terminal R-helical domain, which contains many of the principal determinants involved in the electrophilic substrate binding site (H-site) (22, 37, 38). Further evaluation of the structures using MolProbity indicates >99% of the residues lie in the allowed region of the Ramachandran plot, with the majority of outliers identified as Gln67 residues, which recognize the γ-glutamyl portion of GSH and adopt similar dihedral angles in previously characterized GST structures (13, 21, 37). Views of a single subunit and the overall dimer are presented in Figure 3. The subunits in the dimers are related through noncrystallographic pseudo-2-fold rotation axes that give average root-mean-square deviation values of 0.35 and 0.46 A˚ for the CR atoms between the pairs of subunits in the GSTA4-4 and GIMF asymmetric units, respectively. Similar to the previously described GSTA4-4 structures, PDB entries 1GUM and 1GUL (13), and the first structures of apo and GSH-bound GIMFhelix (PDB entries 3I69 and 3I6A) (26), the 3S-GSDHN-bound GSTA4-4 and GIMFhelix structures described here also exhibit C-terminal regions defined in electron density that extend to at least residues 219 and 220 for all subunits. They also contain the edge-on-face aromatic-aromatic interaction between Phe111 and Tyr217 that reduces local and global dynamics, which aids in the preorganization of the C-terminus for HNE binding as discussed below (14). Binding of 3S-GSDHN. The GSH portion of 3S-GSDHN maintains all the important contacts with previously described G-site residues (13, 19, 37). The most noticeable difference

between the GSTA4-4 and GIMFhelix G-site relates to the glycyl moiety. This portion of the tripeptide extends farther in the GSTA4-4 G-site due to the interaction with Gln45, while the position of the glycyl moiety in GIMFhelix still reflects the presence of the GSTA1-1-derived Arg45 residue. The features of the β1-R1 region, the end of helix R4, and the C-terminus have all been proposed to confer specificity of GSTA4-4 toward alkenals and were targeted to afford high alkenal activity to the GIMFhelix mutant (13, 24). The GSTA4-4 crystal structurebased model proposed by Bruns et al., as well as mutagenesis, indicates Tyr212 is essential for activating alkenals (13, 29). As predicted, the hydroxyl group derived from reduction of the aldehyde is positioned at the bottom of the H-site near the hydroxyl group of Tyr212 in helix R9 of both the GSTA4-4 and GIMFhelix structures. Here the hydroxyl group is actually situated between both the Tyr212 and Tyr9 active site residues. The sulfur atom of the ligand resides near the Tyr9 hydroxyl group and the Arg15 ε-nitrogen, while the long alkyl chain that lies in a hydrophobic binding cavity (primarily delineated by Ile107, Met108, and Phe111 in helix R4 and Tyr212, Val216, and Tyr217 in helix R9) extends into the H-site in a manner that orients the 4-hydroxy substituent toward Arg15 (Figure 4). Although the 3S-GSDHN ligand appears to bind in a similar manner in the GSTA4-4 and GIMFhelix structures (Figure 5A), comparisons of the residues contributing to the active site illustrate an aromatic network of interactions resulting from the presence of a GSTA1-1-derived Phe10 residue in the active site of the GIMFhelix mutant. This residue, which is replaced with a proline in human GSTA4-4, alternates between apo and ligand-bound forms of wild-type GSTA1-1 (18, 19, 21). However, in GSTA4-4, the presence of Tyr212 near the alternate Phe10 position ultimately results in a shift of Phe220 toward the periphery of the active site due to steric hindrance with Phe10 in the region normally occupied by Phe220 in the ligand-bound form of GSTA1-1 (Figure 5B). The locations of Phe10 as well as the 4-hydroxy substituent mentioned above are presumed to have important functional consequences as discussed below. Stereoselectivity of the GSTA4-4 Y9F Mutant. Tyr9 is an established active site residue with catalytic importance in GSTA1-1 and GSTA4-4. Although it is generally categorized

Article

Biochemistry, Vol. 49, No. 7, 2010

1545

site Tyr9 residue exerts any affect on the stereoselectivity observed in GSTA4-4, we examined both substrate stereoselectivity and stereoselectivity of product formation using the GSTA4-4 Y9F mutant. LC-MS analyses show that the Y9F mutant conjugates GSH with C3 of HNE in the same stereoselective manner as the wild-type enzyme (Figure 1 of the Supporting Information). As expected, given the catalytic role of Tyr9 in the G-site, a 71-fold decrease in the kcat was observed compared with that of the wild-type enzyme (28). However, the apparent kcat/Km for 4S-HNE is 1.5-fold greater than for 4R-HNE with both the GSTA4-4 Y9F mutant and wild-type enzymes (Figure 2 of the Supporting Information and ref 28), indicating that Tyr9 is not a determinant of either substrate or product stereoselectivity, despite its importance in catalysis. DISCUSSION

FIGURE 4: Human GSTA4-4 active site. GSTA4-4 is shown in complex with 3S,4R-GSDHN (PDB entry 3IK7, blue ligand). The conserved G-site is toward the bottom half of the figure, with Y9 colored cyan. The 4-hydroxyl group is orientated toward R15, while the aldehyde-derived hydroxyl is in the proximity of Y212 at the bottom of the H-site. Other important active site residues are labeled and shown as spheres to illustrate the hydrophobic cavity.

FIGURE 5: Position of residues 10 and 220 within human A-class GST active sites. (A) Structural superposition of 3S,4R-GSDHNbound GSTA4-4 (PDB entry 3IK7, blue ligand) and 3S,4RGSDHN-bound GSTA1-1 GIMFhelix (PDB entry 3IK9, green ligand). (B) Structural superposition contrasting the side chain of F/P10 and F220. The ball-and-stick representations of residues from the GSTA4-4- and GSTA1-1-GIMFhelix complexes are colored blue and orange, respectively. The ligands are not shown for the sake of clarity in panel B.

among G-site residues, Tyr9 is near the β1-R1 loop that can contribute to the H-site and could in principle also interact with the 4-hydroxyl group of HNE. To establish whether the active

Differences in Stereoselectivity of Product Formation. The extra C-terminal helix R9 plays an important role in the different specificities achieved in the structurally related alphaclass GSTs (13, 14, 24, 27). In general, the C-terminus and the R4-R5 helix-turn-helix “tower” are two of the most dynamic regions in these enzymes. However, the human GSTA4-4 enzyme contains an edge-to-face aromatic-aromatic interaction between Phe111 in helix R4 and Tyr217 in helix R9, which contributes to the closer packing and stability of these regions and increased specificity for HNE (14). Previous results have also implicated this aromatic-aromatic interaction in stereoselectivity, as conformational heterogeneity was found to be inversely correlated with stereoselective product formation in a number of related alpha-class GSTs (28). Interestingly, while the GSTA4-4 enzyme is completely stereoselective at the level of product formation, the GIMFhelix mutant, which incorporates the Phe111-Tyr217 aromatic-aromatic interaction into the GSTA1-1 scaffold, as well as other key GSTA4-4 active site region interactions, shows intermediate stereoselectivity of product formation that is comparable with that of the previously described GSTA1-1 V111F/ R217Y tower mutant. Given the reported catalytic properties of GIMFhelix and the tower mutant (14, 24, 27), comparisons of the LC-MS results indicate that, while the other H-site mutations present in GIMFhelix are also necessary for increasing activity with alkenals, the single Phe111-Tyr217 interaction is sufficient for achieving the level of product stereoselectivity observed, presumably because it limits local and global dynamics to achieve a higher level of steric control within the active site. There is no corresponding interaction in wild-type GSTA1-1, which exhibits a great deal of variation in the ordering of helix R9 (18, 19, 21). The identity and packing of key residues also lead to a differently shaped cavity as illustrated by structural superposition of the 3SGSDHN ligand within the context of the wild-type GSTA1-1 structure (Figure 3 of the Supporting Information). However, in light of these results, it is also interesting that simply the removal of this interaction in the previously described GSTA4-4 F111 V/Y217R mutant did not result in a drastic decrease in stereoselectivity (28), suggesting that some level of nonadditive redundancy important for maintaining the stereoselectivity of production formation is distributed throughout the structure of GSTA4-4. Importantly, however, the difference in product stereoselectivity of wild-type GSTA4-4 and GIMFhelix is not correlated with any differences in substrate stereoselectivity: both enzymes exhibit a slight, and equivalent, stereoselectivity for 4S-HNE (ref 28 and vide infra).

1546

Biochemistry, Vol. 49, No. 7, 2010

Analysis of the 3S-GSDHN-GIMFhelix crystal structure offers an explanation for why GSTA4-4 is completely stereoselective in product formation, while the GIMFhelix mutant is not. Initial comparisons of the residues lining a hydrophobic cavity in GSTA4-4 (PDB entries 1GUM and 1GUL) and GIMFhelix (PDB entries 3I69 and 3I6A) suggested that an altered conformation of the Met108 side chain may hinder ligand binding in the putative H-site of GIMFhelix (26). However, superpositions with the 3S-GSDHN-GSTA4-4 structure reported here indicate Met108 is able to occupy alternate locations to accommodate different H-site ligands. Our initial comparisons of GIMFhelix with GSTA4-4 also revealed a unique aromatic network within the mutant’s active site that may be responsible for the remaining differences in the catalytic efficiencies of GIMFhelix and GSTA4-4, which is confirmed by the ligandbound structures reported here. Phe220 is a conserved residue in helix R9 and has been proposed to play a key role in orienting the reacting substrates and guiding them to the transition state (39). However, while Phe220 appears to be positioned to perform this function without any significant reorganization of active site residues in GSTA4-4, the side chain of Phe10 of GSTA1-1 alternates between apo and ligand-bound forms and upon ligand binding moves to allow Phe220 to drive C-terminal closure over the active site (19, 21, 39, 40). Position 10 was not among the residues selected for mutation in the construction of GIMFhelix, and analogous to the situation recently described for the first GIMFhelix structures (26), the presence of both Phe10 and Tyr212 within the active site causes Phe10 to maintain its “apo” position, even with both the G- and H-sites now occupied by the 3S-GSDHN ligand. In this context, Phe10 sterically hinders the optimal preorganization of the C-terminus of GIMFhelix. This would prevent the maintenance of a consistent HNE orientation with respect to GSH, which is presumably linked with the high substrate specificity of both the H- and G-sites, and the corresponding transition state interactions. Apparently, preorganized helix R9 is necessary for complete steric control of the nucleophilic attack that produces only the S-configuration at the site of conjugation in GSTA4-4. Structural Basis for Coupled Substrate Specificity and Stereopromiscuity. Murine GSTA4-4 was previously cocrystallized with GSHNE [PDB entry 1B48 (23)], but the extrapolation of interactions important for catalysis is complicated not only by key sequence differences between the human and murine proteins but also more importantly by the cyclized structure of the GSHNE ligand. The 3S-GSDHN ligand discussed herein was generated from the NaBH4 reduction of 3S-GSHNE, which was produced using the GSTA4-4-catalyzed conjugation of GSH and racemic HNE (Figure 1). Hence, the uncyclized 3S-GSDHNbound GSTA4-4 crystal structure provides insight into the ternary substrate complex and is the first structural model for the relevant product complex of GSTA4-4 with GSHNE prior to the intramolecular cyclization. Structural superpositions of the apo (PDB entries 1GUM and 3I69) and 3S-GSDHN-bound GSTA4-4 and GIMFhelix structures indicate that substrate and product binding cause negligible structural reorganization. The C-terminus assumes a similar localized structure regardless of ligand occupancy (Figure 6), further emphasizing the preorganization that specifically accommodates the physiologically relevant ligand within a constricted active site, in contrast to the highly dynamic C-terminus observed in the more promiscuous GSTA1-1 enzyme (18, 21). Such rigid preorganization of the GSTA4-4 C-terminus suggests that the observed substrate

Balogh et al.

FIGURE 6: C-Terminal regions of apo and ligand-bound human GSTA4-4. Structural superposition of apo (PDB entry 1GUM, orange) and 3S,4R-GSDHN-bound GSTA4-4 (PDB entry 3IK7, blue) illustrating the localized structure of helix R9 regardless of ligand occupancy. Only residues 208-220 are shown for the sake of clarity.

stereopromiscuity does not result from a flexible active site and must depend on other mechanisms of degenerate substrate recognition. In addition to the extra helix R9, a distinguishing feature of alpha-class GSTs is incorporation of a conserved Arg15 residue in a position near the GSH sulfur, which helps to stabilize the thiolate and aids in lowering the pKa value of Tyr9 (22, 41). Beyond its role in the G-site, Arg15 has also been proposed to interact with at least one enantiomer of HNE. Although there is no existing crystal structure with HNE bound to the H-site, a model for the binding of HNE was proposed by Bruns et al. on the basis of GSTA4-4 in complex with the inhibitor S-(2-iodobenzyl)-GSH (13). This model assumed a chirality that would permit hydrogen bonding between the 4-hydroxy substituent and Arg15, though it also anticipates that either enantiomer of HNE should fit into the binding pocket. Likewise, despite a very small preference for 4S-HNE as a substrate, our previously reported kinetic characterization demonstrated GSTA4-4 still exhibits remarkably high apparent efficiencies for both enantiomers (28). The 3S-GSDHN-bound crystal structures reported here offer the first crystallographic look at a biologically relevant ligand bound to GSTA4-4 and illustrate how the hydroxyl group of either 4R- or 4S-HNE can be positioned equidistant from Arg15 (Figure 4). Because racemic HNE was used to generate the 3SGSDHN ligand, both configurations at C4 are possible and both 3S,4R-GSDHN and 3S,4S-GSDHN were considered in all the subunits. However, on the basis of the experimental data, a strong preference was not observed for either configuration at C4 so 3S,4R-GSDHN was modeled and refined in all subunits for the sake of consistency. Interestingly, even within the constricted and rigid active site, the extension of the GSDHN alkyl chain beyond position 3 could be rotated in a manner that places it toward the “right” side of the hydrophobic binding groove in the H-site cavity (without disrupting the interaction of the aldehydederived oxygen with Tyr212 or a 2,3-trans-like arrangement for the ligand). Whereas the binding mode observed in the crystal structure allows the hydroxyl groups of both 4R- and 4S-HNE to approach Arg15 without any nearby residues between which to

Article discriminate, or disfavor binding of either enantiomer, the additional binding mode reflected in the rotated model would favor an interaction with only 4S-HNE. Occasional binding in this mode could yield the small preference observed for the S-enantiomer in the kinetic assay (28). Whereas an emerging paradigm assumes that catalytic promiscuity requires protein flexibility, the stereopromiscuity of GSTA4-4 reveals an alternative strategy. Collectively, these results illustrate the structural basis underlying the ability of GSTA4-4 to exploit the hydroxyl group of either 4R- or 4S-HNE, while specifically binding HNE and GSH to maintain high catalytic efficiency linked with stereoselective product formation for both enantiomeric substrates. The symmetrical location of Arg15 between the possible 4-OH orientations of HNE ensures that the biologically formed racemate will be effectively metabolized. The rigid preformed structural scaffold, including the symmetrically poised Arg15, allows GSTA4-4 to orchestrate this intriguing combination of high substrate specificity and high product stereoselectivity, coupled with low substrate stereoselectivity, that effectively eliminates the toxic racemic mixture produced as a consequence of oxidative stress, while simultaneously achieving complete stereoselectivity of product formation that yields specific GSHNE diastereomers. It is unclear whether the product stereoselectivity has biological utility or whether it is only a consequence of the rigid environment that optimally aligns reactants for high catalytic efficiency. Interestingly, previous results suggest the GSHNE diastereomers will have different effects and fates in biological tissues (42), which underscores a possible role for the stereoselectivity of GSH conjugation of GSTA4-4. Therefore, in addition to metabolizing both HNE enantiomers, the stereoselectivity exhibited during the generation of the conjugate will conceivably influence other metabolite bioactivity (43) and has further implications regarding stereochemical coordination of the overall detoxification scheme.

Biochemistry, Vol. 49, No. 7, 2010

4. 5. 6. 7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT Portions of this research were conducted at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory (SSRL), a national user facility operated by Stanford University on behalf of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences. The SSRL Structural Molecular Biology Program is supported by the Department of Energy, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, and by the National Institutes of Health, National Center for Research Resources, Biomedical Technology Program. We also gratefully acknowledge Prof. Philip Board (Australian National University, Canberra, Australia) for providing the construct for expressing hGSTA4-4. SUPPORTING INFORMATION AVAILABLE Supporting Figures 1-3. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org. REFERENCES 1. Ansari, N. H., Wang, L., and Srivastava, S. K. (1996) Role of lipid aldehydes in cataractogenesis: 4-Hydroxynonenal-induced cataract. Biochem. Mol. Med. 58, 25–30. 2. Grimsrud, P. A., Picklo, M. J., Sr., Griffin, T. J., and Bernlohr, D. A. (2007) Carbonylation of adipose proteins in obesity and insulin resistance: Identification of adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein as a cellular target of 4-hydroxynonenal. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6, 624– 637. 3. Hu, W., Feng, Z., Eveleigh, J., Iyer, G., Pan, J., Amin, S., Chung, F. L., and Tang, M. S. (2002) The major lipid peroxidation product,

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

1547

trans-4-hydroxy-2-nonenal, preferentially forms DNA adducts at codon 249 of human p53 gene, a unique mutational hotspot in hepatocellular carcinoma. Carcinogenesis 23, 1781–1789. Zarkovic, K. (2003) 4-Hydroxynonenal and neurodegenerative diseases. Mol. Aspects Med. 24, 293–303. Carini, M., Aldini, G., and Facino, R. M. (2004) Mass spectrometry for detection of 4-hydroxy-trans-2-nonenal (HNE) adducts with peptides and proteins. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 23, 281–305. Awasthi, Y. C., Ansari, G. A., and Awasthi, S. (2005) Regulation of 4-hydroxynonenal mediated signaling by glutathione S-transferases. Methods Enzymol. 401, 379–407. Yang, Y., Sharma, R., Sharma, A., Awasthi, S., and Awasthi, Y. C. (2003) Lipid peroxidation and cell cycle signaling: 4-Hydroxynonenal, a key molecule in stress mediated signaling. Acta Biochim. Pol. 50, 319–336. Cheng, J. Z., Sharma, R., Yang, Y., Singhal, S. S., Sharma, A., Saini, M. K., Singh, S. V., Zimniak, P., Awasthi, S., and Awasthi, Y. C. (2001) Accelerated metabolism and exclusion of 4-hydroxynonenal through induction of RLIP76 and hGST5.8 is an early adaptive response of cells to heat and oxidative stress. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 41213–41223. Hashimoto, M., Sibata, T., Wasada, H., Toyokuni, S., and Uchida, K. (2003) Structural basis of protein-bound endogenous aldehydes. Chemical and immunochemical characterizations of configurational isomers of a 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal-histidine adduct. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 5044–5051. Hiratsuka, A., Hirose, K., Saito, H., and Watabe, T. (2000) 4-Hydroxy-2(E)-nonenal enantiomers: (S)-Selective inactivation of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and detoxification by rat glutathione S-transferase A4-4. Biochem. J. 349, 729–735. Wakita, C., Maeshima, T., Yamazaki, A., Shibata, T., Ito, S., Akagawa, M., Ojika, M., Yodoi, J., and Uchida, K. (2009) Stereochemical configuration of 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal-cysteine adducts and their stereoselective formation in a redox-regulated protein. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 28810–28822. Board, P. G. (1998) Identification of cDNAs encoding two human alpha class glutathione transferases (GSTA3 and GSTA4) and the heterologous expression of GSTA4-4. Biochem. J. 330, 827–831. Bruns, C. M., Hubatsch, I., Ridderstrom, M., Mannervik, B., and Tainer, J. A. (1999) Human glutathione transferase A4-4 crystal structures and mutagenesis reveal the basis of high catalytic efficiency with toxic lipid peroxidation products. J. Mol. Biol. 288, 427–439. Hou, L., Honaker, M. T., Shireman, L. M., Balogh, L. M., Roberts, A. G., Ng, K. C., Nath, A., and Atkins, W. M. (2007) Functional promiscuity correlates with conformational heterogeneity in A-class glutathione S-transferases. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 23264–23274. Hubatsch, I., Ridderstrom, M., and Mannervik, B. (1998) Human glutathione transferase A4-4: An alpha class enzyme with high catalytic efficiency in the conjugation of 4-hydroxynonenal and other genotoxic products of lipid peroxidation. Biochem. J. 330, 175–179. Zhao, T., Singhal, S. S., Piper, J. T., Cheng, J., Pandya, U., ClarkWronski, J., Awasthi, S., and Awasthi, Y. C. (1999) The role of human glutathione S-transferases hGSTA1-1 and hGSTA2-2 in protection against oxidative stress. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 367, 216–224. Adman, E. T., Le Trong, I., Stenkamp, R. E., Nieslanik, B. S., Dietze, E. C., Tai, G., Ibarra, C., and Atkins, W. M. (2001) Localization of the C-terminus of rat glutathione S-transferase A1-1: Crystal structure of mutants W21F and W21F/F220Y. Proteins 42, 192–200. Cameron, A. D., Sinning, I., L’Hermite, G., Olin, B., Board, P. G., Mannervik, B., and Jones, T. A. (1995) Structural analysis of human alpha-class glutathione transferase A1-1 in the apo-form and in complexes with ethacrynic acid and its glutathione conjugate. Structure 3, 717–727. Grahn, E., Novotny, M., Jakobsson, E., Gustafsson, A., Grehn, L., Olin, B., Madsen, D., Wahlberg, M., Mannervik, B., and Kleywegt, G. J. (2006) New crystal structures of human glutathione transferase A1-1 shed light on glutathione binding and the conformation of the Cterminal helix. Acta Crystallogr. D62, 197–207. Kuhnert, D. C., Sayed, Y., Mosebi, S., Sayed, M., Sewell, T., and Dirr, H. W. (2005) Tertiary interactions stabilise the C-terminal region of human glutathione transferase A1-1: A crystallographic and calorimetric study. J. Mol. Biol. 349, 825–838. Le Trong, I., Stenkamp, R. E., Ibarra, C., Atkins, W. M., and Adman, E. T. (2002) 1.3-A˚ resolution structure of human glutathione S-transferase with S-hexyl glutathione bound reveals possible extended ligandin binding site. Proteins 48, 618–627. Sinning, I., Kleywegt, G. J., Cowan, S. W., Reinemer, P., Dirr, H. W., Huber, R., Gilliland, G. L., Armstrong, R. N., Ji, X., and Board, P. G.; et al. (1993) Structure determination and refinement of human

1548

23.

24.

25. 26.

27.

28.

29.

30. 31. 32.

Biochemistry, Vol. 49, No. 7, 2010

alpha class glutathione transferase A1-1, and a comparison with the mu and pi class enzymes. J. Mol. Biol. 232, 192–212. Xiao, B., Singh, S. P., Nanduri, B., Awasthi, Y. C., Zimniak, P., and Ji, X. (1999) Crystal structure of a murine glutathione S-transferase in complex with a glutathione conjugate of 4-hydroxynon-2-enal in one subunit and glutathione in the other: Evidence of signaling across the dimer interface. Biochemistry 38, 11887–11894. Nilsson, L. O., Gustafsson, A., and Mannervik, B. (2000) Redesign of substrate-selectivity determining modules of glutathione transferase A1-1 installs high catalytic efficiency with toxic alkenal products of lipid peroxidation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 9408–9412. Babbitt, P. C. (2000) Reengineering the glutathione S-transferase scaffold: A rational design strategy pays off. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 10298–10300. Balogh, L. M., Le Trong, I., Kripps, K. A., Tars, K., Stenkamp, R. E., Mannervik, B., and Atkins, W. M. (2009) Structural analysis of a glutathione transferase A1-1 mutant tailored for high catalytic efficiency with toxic alkenals. Biochemistry 48, 7698–7704. Blikstad, C., Shokeer, A., Kurtovic, S., and Mannervik, B. (2008) Emergence of a novel highly specific and catalytically efficient enzyme from a naturally promiscuous glutathione transferase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1780, 1458–1463. Balogh, L. M., Roberts, A. G., Shireman, L. M., Greene, R. J., and Atkins, W. M. (2008) The stereochemical course of 4-hydroxy2-nonenal metabolism by glutathione S-transferases. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 16702–16710. Hubatsch, I., and Mannervik, B. (2001) A highly acidic tyrosine 9 and a normally titrating tyrosine 212 contribute to the catalytic mechanism of human glutathione transferase A4-4. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 280, 878–882. Otwinowski, Z., and Minor, W. (1997) Processing of X-ray Diffraction Data Collected in Oscillation Mode. Methods Enzymol. 276, 307– 326. McCoy, A. J. (2007) Solving structures of protein complexes by molecular replacement with Phaser. Acta Crystallogr. D63, 32–41. Long, F., Vagin, A. A., Young, P., and Murshudov, G. N. (2008) BALBES: A molecular-replacement pipeline. Acta Crystallogr. D64, 125–132.

Balogh et al. 33. Murshudov, G. N., Vagin, A. A., and Dodson, E. J. (1997) Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr. D53, 240–255. 34. Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4 (1994) The CCP4 suite: Programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D50, 760–763. 35. McRee, D. E. (1992) A Visual Protein Crystallographic Software System for X11/Xview. J. Mol. Graphics 10, 44–46. 36. Davis, I. W., Leaver-Fay, A., Chen, V. B., Block, J. N., Kapral, G. J., Wang, X., Murray, L. W., Arendall, W. B., III, Snoeyink, J., Richardson, J. S., and Richardson, D. C. (2007) MolProbity: Allatom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W375–W383. 37. Armstrong, R. N. (1997) Structure, catalytic mechanism, and evolution of the glutathione transferases. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 10, 2–18. 38. Hayes, J. D., Flanagan, J. U., and Jowsey, I. R. (2005) Glutathione transferases. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 45, 51–88. 39. Nilsson, L. O., Edalat, M., Pettersson, P. L., and Mannervik, B. (2002) Aromatic residues in the C-terminal region of glutathione transferase A1-1 influence rate-determining steps in the catalytic mechanism. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1598, 199–205. 40. Ibarra, C., Nieslanik, B. S., and Atkins, W. M. (2001) Contribution of aromatic-aromatic interactions to the anomalous pKa of tyrosine-9 and the C-terminal dynamics of glutathione S-transferase A1-1. Biochemistry 40, 10614–10624. 41. Bjornestedt, R., Stenberg, G., Widersten, M., Board, P. G., Sinning, I., Jones, T. A., and Mannervik, B. (1995) Functional significance of arginine 15 in the active site of human class alpha glutathione transferase A1-1. J. Mol. Biol. 247, 765–773. 42. Gueraud, F., Crouzet, F., Alary, J., Rao, D., Debrauwer, L., Laurent, F., and Cravedi, J. P. (2005) Enantioselective metabolism of (R)- and (S)-4-hydroxy-2-nonenal in rat. BioFactors 24, 97–104. 43. Ramana, K. V., Bhatnagar, A., Srivastava, S., Yadav, U. C., Awasthi, S., Awasthi, Y. C., and Srivastava, S. K. (2006) Mitogenic responses of vascular smooth muscle cells to lipid peroxidation-derived aldehyde 4-hydroxy-trans-2-nonenal (HNE): Role of aldose reductasecatalyzed reduction of the HNE-glutathione conjugates in regulating cell growth. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 17652–17660.