Document not found! Please try again

Super-Resolution Imaging and Plasmonics - Chemical Reviews

In this review, we describe both how super-resolution imaging is used to ...... Interestingly, sometimes we get the answer wrong. ...... https://chemp...
0 downloads 0 Views 23MB Size
Review pubs.acs.org/CR

Super-Resolution Imaging and Plasmonics Katherine A. Willets,* Andrew J. Wilson, Vignesh Sundaresan, and Padmanabh B. Joshi Department of Chemistry, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122, United States ABSTRACT: This review describes the growing partnership between super-resolution imaging and plasmonics, by describing the various ways in which the two topics mutually benefit one another to enhance our understanding of the nanoscale world. First, localization-based super-resolution imaging strategies, where molecules are modulated between emissive and nonemissive states and their emission localized, are applied to plasmonic nanoparticle substrates, revealing the hidden shape of the nanoparticles while also mapping local electromagnetic field enhancements and reactivity patterns on their surface. However, these results must be interpreted carefully due to localization errors induced by the interaction between metallic substrates and single fluorophores. Second, plasmonic nanoparticles are explored as image contrast agents for both superlocalization and super-resolution imaging, offering benefits such as high photostability, large signal-tonoise, and distance-dependent spectral features but presenting challenges for localizing individual nanoparticles within a diffraction-limited spot. Finally, the use of plasmontailored excitation fields to achieve subdiffraction-limited spatial resolution is discussed, using localized surface plasmons and surface plasmon polaritons to create confined excitation volumes or image magnification to enhance spatial resolution.

CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Localization-Based Super-Resolution Imaging of Plasmonic Nanostructures 2.1. Introduction 2.2. Molecular Photophysics near Plasmonic Nanostructures 2.2.1. Modulating Molecular Emission near Plasmonic Nanostructures 2.2.2. Impact of Plasmonic Metals on Molecular Photophysics 2.3. Localization Errors in Super-Resolution Imaging near Plasmonic Substrates 2.3.1. Impact of Plasmonic Nanostructures on Localization Errors 2.3.2. Appropriateness of the Two-Dimensional Gaussian Model 2.3.3. Dealing with the Luminescence Background 2.4. Super-Resolution Imaging of Plasmon-Enhanced Electromagnetic Fields 2.5. Reconstruction of Nanoparticle Shape by Super-Resolution Imaging 2.6. Super-Resolution Imaging of Reactions on Plasmonic Nanoparticle Surfaces 2.7. Summary 3. Plasmonic Nanostructures As Image Contrast Agents 3.1. Introduction 3.2. Superlocalization of Plasmonic Nanoparticles: Position and Orientation 3.2.1. Dark-Field Scattering © 2017 American Chemical Society

3.2.2. Interference Scattering (iSCAT) 3.2.3. Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) 3.3. Resolving Subdiffraction Interparticle Distances through Plasmon Coupling 3.4. Super-Resolution Imaging with Plasmonic Nanoparticles 3.4.1. Dark-Field Scattering 3.4.2. Plasmon Saturation 3.4.3. Nonlinear Photothermal Imaging 3.4.4. Plasmon Photoswitches 3.5. Summary 4. Tailoring Excitation Fields via Plasmon Excitation 4.1. Introduction 4.2. Using Electromagnetic Hot Spots As NearField Excitation Sources 4.2.1. Hot Spot Arrays 4.2.2. Dynamically Addressable Hot Spots 4.3. Improving Resolution with Surface Plasmon Polaritons 4.4. Plasmon-Assisted Super-Resolution Imaging 4.4.1. Structured Illumination Microscopy (SIM) 4.4.2. Stimulated Emission Depletion (STED) 4.5. Super- and Hyperlenses 4.6. Summary 5. Conclusions and Outlook Author Information Corresponding Author

7539 7541 7541 7541 7541 7542 7544 7544 7547 7547 7548 7549 7551 7553 7553 7553

7556 7556 7557 7558 7558 7560 7561 7562 7563 7563 7563 7563 7563 7566 7566 7567 7567 7569 7570 7572 7572 7573 7573

Special Issue: Super-Resolution and Single-Molecule Imaging

7554 7554

Received: August 13, 2016 Published: January 13, 2017 7538

DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00547 Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 7538−7582

Chemical Reviews

Review

Figure 1. (A) Schematic of a localized surface plasmon showing the displacement and resulting oscillation of the surface conduction electrons in response to light. (B) Schematic of a surface plasmon polariton (SPP), showing the propagation of a charge density wave down a thin metal film. (C) Near-field electromagnetic field intensity distribution around plasmonic nanostructures of varying shapes (sphere, cube, and triangle) excited by plane wave excitation at their plasmon resonance. The sphere on the left has radius 50 nm, and the remaining particles have the same total volume as the sphere. The color scale represents the intensity of the local electromagnetic field relative to the incident intensity. Adapted with permission from ref 25. Copyright 2005 Materials Research Society. (D) Electric field distribution of a propagating plasmon along a nanowire at an interface. Adapted from ref 24. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society.

ORCID Notes Biographies Acknowledgments References

A plasmon is a quasi-particle, based upon a light-driven, coherent multielectron oscillation in materials with negative real and small positive imaginary dielectric constants.10−15 Put another way, the electric field component of light interacts with the surface conduction electrons in a plasmonic material, driving those electrons into a collective oscillation at the frequency of the incident field (Figure 1, panels A and B). In the visible region of light, the dielectric condition for plasmon excitation (i.e negative real and small positive imaginary dielectric constant) is met by coinage metals such as gold and silver, which are the most common plasmonic materials, although metals such as aluminum and copper have recently generated significant interest due to improved control over oxide formation.16−18 In the near IR, doped semiconductors such as aluminum-doped zinc oxide and tin-doped indium oxide have recently emerged as a new class of plasmonic materials, indicating the diversity of materials capable of supporting plasmons.19−23 Plasmons are typically separated into two categories, localized surface plasmons and propagating surface plasmons (or SPP), based on the dimensions of the underlying structures. Localized surface plasmons are excited on nanoparticles with dimensions smaller than the wavelength of the excitation light and can be thought of as standing electron density waves trapped near the surface of the nanoparticle (Figure 1A).15,24,25 Alternatively, propagating plasmons are excited in materials with at least one dimension smaller than the wavelength of light and another larger than the wavelength of light (for example, a thin metal film or a micron-length nanowire), such that the electron density wave travels along the extended dimension of the structure over distances much longer than the wavelength of light (Figure 1B). In both cases, the concentration of

7573 7573 7573 7573 7573

1. INTRODUCTION Super-resolution imaging has largely been recognized for its contributions to biological imaging (and to demonstrate this, one need look no further than the 2014 Nobel Prize in Chemistry announcement),1 but the technique is quickly gaining popularity for addressing problems in materials science, finding utility in studying polymer dynamics, catalysis, and plasmonics.2−9 Super-resolution imaging encompasses a range of far-field optical microscopies, which have the common ability to produce images with resolution below the diffraction-limit of light. Plasmonics and super-resolution imaging are natural partners, given that plasmonics provides a simple strategy to achieve subdiffraction-limited excitation volumes using a farfield excitation source, by exploiting the natural ability of plasmonic nanostructures to focus light to subwavelength dimensions. Moreover, plasmonic nanoparticles are attractive alternatives to organic dyes or quantum dots as image contrast agents for optical microscopy, due to their large extinction cross sections, high photostability, and lack of blinking (which can be both an asset and a liability in super-resolution imaging applications). Lastly, plasmonic nanostructures are by their very nature nanoscale in dimension, requiring subdiffraction-limited imaging tools to explore many of the subtle relationships between structure and function. 7539

DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00547 Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 7538−7582

Chemical Reviews

Review

are beyond the scope of this review). For the former class, individual emitters are controllably modulated between emissive (“on”) and nonemissive (“off”) states such that only a single emitter is “on” within a diffraction-limited spot at a given time.56,63,64 The diffraction-limited emission from that single emitter is then fit to a model function, such as a twodimensional (2D) Gaussian, in order to localize its position based on finding the peak of the fit. The fitting process is repeated multiple times as different molecules are switched between the “on” and “off” states, allowing the position of each emitter to be independently localized. Superimposing the positions of the individual emitters creates a composite reconstructed image. This approach to super-resolution imaging has many associated acronyms (STORM, PALM, PAINT, and GSDIM), typically distinguished by the mechanism with which molecules are modulated between emissive and nonemissive states; in this review, we will group these techniques as localization-based super-resolution imaging strategies. Alternatively, techniques such as stimulated emission depletion (STED) or structured illumination microscopy (SIM) achieve improved resolution by modification of the far-field excitation profile through the introduction of phase masks or interference grids. Unlike localization-based superresolution imaging, tailored excitation approaches do not require specialized emitters but do require the introduction of additional imaging elements and, in some cases, significant image processing. In combination, super-resolution imaging and plasmonics enjoy a mutually beneficial relationship. In this review, we describe both how super-resolution imaging is used to enhance our understanding of plasmonic nanostructures by probing structure/function relationships at nanoscale dimensions, as well as how plasmonic nanostructures are integrated into superresolution imaging techniques to improve their performance. In the first section, we discuss how localization-based superresolution imaging strategies allow us to map local electromagnetic field enhancements on plasmonic nanostructures, optically determine the shapes of plasmonic nanostructures, and even follow reactions happening on the surface of plasmonic nanostructures. We also describe the major challenges of using localization-based super-resolution imaging in combination with plasmonic nanostructures, specifically the various sources of localization error that can occur due to the proximity of metallic substrates. In the second section, we discuss how plasmonic nanostructures are used as probes for a suite of different super-resolution imaging techniques. Here, we make careful note of the distinction between super-resolution, in which two nearby emitters are spatially discriminated, and superlocalization, in which the position of a single emitter is determined with