Survey of black scientists in the United States

of Block Scientists in the United States. Affirmative action policies and equal employment op- portunities have caused the hiring of qualified Blackst...
1 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size
Herman A. Young University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky 4 0 x 8

Survey of Black Scientists in the United States

Affirmative action policies and equal employment opportunities have caused the hiring of qualified Blacks to become a problem for many colleges and universities. Many institutions seeking to fill a vacancy in their science department with a Black who has a PhD in one of the disciplines of science have questions that they undoubtedly would like to have answered. One is: Where does one find such persons? Most likely in the South. Sixty percent of all Black American scientists with the doctoral degree are teachine hlack colleges - and universities, "a t nredominantlv . which are mostly in the south. Althounh 75% of all Black students now enrolled in college are at predominantly white colleges and universities, the majority of those students who go on to do graduate work still come from the predominantly Black colleges. It is estimated that about 600,000 Blacks are enrolled in American colleges and universities today. A recent study hy the Educational Testing Service (1) indicated that 15,400 Blacks were in graduate schools; this constitutes 5.4% of all graduate school enrollments. The areas of concentrations related to science were 6% in the physical sciences, 4.3% in the biological sciences, and 3% in engineering. One can calculate this 13.4% of the 15,500 who were in the physical and biological sciences to be 1977 students of natural sciences now in graduate schools. Fred Crossland's (2) study in 1968 for the Ford Foundation showed that only 1.7% of all graduate enrollees were Black and only 0.78% of those go on to complete doctoral studies. When the attrition rate a t the doctoral level is taken into consideration, one sees the significance of this study and a different pattern emerges. The number of Blacks with doctoral degrees in the natural sciences is alarmingly low. Jay's study (31 in 1969 estimnted the .....-..-that . - ~ ~ - number -~ ~ ~ of science doctorates at that time was about 700. The estimated increase of 30 to 40 per year hv dav and the studv bv. Bwant - ( 4 ) for the Ford Foundation in 1970 did not diifer significantly from this approximation. This would indicate conservatively about 1000 doctorates today; this figure includes those in biology, chemistry, physics, engineering, mathematics, agricultural sciences, pharmacy, and the fields of health sciences and their contingency areas, hut does not include physicians or dentists. The study conducted by Young (5) of Black doctorates, nationwide, showed presently employed doctorates to he 45% in biology, 25% in chemistry, 7% in physics and the remaining 10% in other areae of science. Eighty-nine percent were employed in academic institutions, while 11% were employed in government, industry, etc. Eighty-nine percent were male and 11% female. The rank of positions ranged from assistant professors, to research project directors, to presidents of colleges, and also included vice presidents of predominantly white universities. The institutions of employment were throughout the U.S.A., 60% predominantly Southern and 40% non-Southern predominantly white institutions. The average age was 49, ranging from 28 to 74 with 1% a t the age 28 and 1%at 71. Seventy percent of these scientists were born in the South, 13.6% in the East, 8.6% in the Midwest, 0.5% in ~

~.. ~

the West, and 4.5% in the border states; 3% were foreign born. Seventy-five percent did their undergraduate work a t predominantly Black colleges. However, 53% obtained their doctoral degrees from institutions in the Midwest. Another question is: Why are the majority of Black PhD's working at small predominantly Black institutions when they could be working a t large prestigious universities? One might assume that racial pride would he the factor. However, most of these scientists felt that discrimination in employment was the major factor. At the heginning of their post doctoral work experience, most felt very optimistic about employment on the open market. They felt that their ability and doctorate degree ("union card") would provide the proper job opportunity. Seventy-four percent preferred to be employed in a situation where they could teach and do research. Since most Black institutions have few research facilities, they would have accepted offers from predominantly white institutions. Coincidentally only 11% wanted to do pure research. Others would have referred management, development, ap. plied research, or governmental applications, etc. But institutions where teaching and research both occur refused to hire them a t that time, so most accepted jobs where they were needed and could he employed, a t predominantly Black colleges. No difference was found in those scientists who attended Black undergraduate schools. Most of those coming from black schools attributed their success to five factors 1) The small schools allowed for more personal attention and

personal development.

2) Most were greatly influenced hy one science instructor. 3) Students saw science instructors who had achieved on their

own at Black campuses, but they did not necessarily want to emulate them. Instead they wanted to attain their own new heights in the dominant society. 4) The special push by one science instructor was a factor. This instructor, on spotting a student of unusual ability, earmarked that student for scholarship and graduate school. He was wided, advised, and challenged to his fullest potential. 5) Role model: While admitting that their science instructor was mostly responsible for directing their careers, most had aspired to be physicians or dentists. Doctors, lawyers, and ministers are the professionals of the highest repute in the black community. Only 30% never considered the field of medicine. (There are six times more holders of doctorates in medicine than in natural sciences.) But with the change of the social structure of the dominant society and the advent of affirmative action programs, demands for Black scientists have been created in the market place. Sixty percent of these scientists have had job offers to come to predominantly white institutions while only 12% never received such offers. The 11% employed in the non-academic areas all have had multiple offers from government and industry. Of the 89% employed in academia, 97% have had offers from other black as well as white institutions. The next major concern about the prospective Black candidate is: How well does he get along with non-Blacks Volume 51, Number 12, December 1974 / 781

or what is his level of Black awareness. Most of the scientists had great loyality to their discipline. Thirty-six percent felt that their personal contributions toward helping in the Black struggle could best be done through increasing the general store of knowledge (helping to increase the bank of all knowledee throueh science). Thev felt thev should be good scientkts whoLappen to'he lack. ~ h i r t i four percent believed in beine e w d Black scientists. he first group preferred t o b e referred to simply as scientists, while the second group preferred to be considered Blacks who are scientists. Seventeen percent believed their contributions to Blacks can best be done through being role models for other Blacks. This was felt by almost all of those in industry. The socio-political dogmas of the young were not significantly different from those of the old, nor did there seem to be any greater demand for younger scientists than older scientists. The greatest demand ages were between 32 and 56. Most had socio-political attachments to moderate organizations like NAACP and Urban League. Salary? Although the law of supply and demand does have its effects. the salarv scale for Blacks is not unreasonahle-most are negotiaied from average salary levels at the recruiting institution plus a couple of thousand dollars for sweeteners necessary to warrant relocating a family of a wife and two children to a community amenable to middle class Blacks, And finally: What are the possibilities for getting Black scientists to change iobs todav? Of those em~lovedin eovernment and ind;stry, 42%'would prefer both t e a c h g and research (these could be attracted). Of those already

782

/ Journal of ChemicalEducation

teaching in both black and white universities, 78% are quite happy with their work. Nine percent of this group prefer industrial research, and 11% prefer university research without teaching (5). These are the facts on the black doctorate; to attract one to an institution, you might do well to consider the following alternatives: In light of the most recent figures of the Educational Testing Service which showed close to 2000 Blacks enrolled in graduate schools in the natural sciences, three approaches could be used to increase the supply of doctorates. (1) See that a higher percentage of those enrolled are encouraged to finish. (2) Encourage a graduate student to enroll in a doctoral program in a department (with an adequate stipend) with prospects of his . . staying on for a limited time d t e r he has completed the terminal degree in order for him to attain top calibre university experience. (3) Hire someone with a Masters degree and subsidize him to go back to school to obtain his doctorate. By the latter method most predominantly black schools obtained their present supply of Black doctorates. And in the process of getting a Black science doctorate, you can also chalk one u p for altruism; you'd be adding to the pool of available Black doctorates. Uterature Cited i l l "Concentrstos," C. B E . N e w 51.47. 13 (No". 5. 19731. (21 Cmssland, F. E.. "Graduate Education and Black Americans," Ford Foundation. New YWk. (31 Jay, James, "Negoeain Science: Natural Seienee Dwtorates 1876-1969.'' (4) Bryant. J. W.. "A Survey of Black American Doctorates." Ford Foundation, New York. (5) Young, H. A . "An Educational and Professional Pmfile of Black American D m M a% in the Natural Scicnec~," Indians University, 1973 (unpublished dimrtstion!.