Susceptibility of Goethite to Fe2+-Catalyzed Recrystallization over

Sep 12, 2017 - Recent work has shown that iron oxides, such as goethite and hematite, may recrystallize in the presence of aqueous Fe2+ under anoxic c...
1 downloads 8 Views 1MB Size
Subscriber access provided by University of Sussex Library

Article 2+

Susceptibility of goethite to Fe -catalyzed recrystallization over time Prachi Joshi, Matthew Fantle, Philip Larese-Casanova, and Christopher A. Gorski Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b02603 • Publication Date (Web): 12 Sep 2017 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on September 12, 2017

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a free service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are accessible to all readers and citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

Environmental Science & Technology is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 35

Environmental Science & Technology

Susceptibility of goethite to Fe2+-catalyzed recrystallization over time Prachi Joshi,† Matthew S. Fantle,‡ Philip Larese-Casanova,¶ and Christopher A. Gorski∗,† †Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, 212 1

Sackett Building, University Park, PA 16802 ‡Department of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, 212 Deike Building, University Park, PA 16802 ¶Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, Snell Engineering Center, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115 E-mail: [email protected] Phone: 814-865-5673. Fax: 814-863-7304

2

Abstract

3

Recent work has shown that iron oxides, such as goethite and hematite, may recrystal-

4

lize in the presence of aqueous Fe2+ under anoxic conditions. This process, referred to

5

as Fe2+ -catalyzed recrystallization, can influence water quality by causing the incor-

6

poration/release of environmental contaminants and biological nutrients. Accounting

7

for the effects of Fe2+ -catalyzed recrystallization on water quality requires knowing

8

the time scale over which recrystallization occurs. Here, we tested the hypothesis that

9

nanoparticulate goethite becomes less susceptible to Fe2+ -catalyzed recrystallization

10

over time. We set up two batches of reactors in which

11

different time points, and tracked the

55

55

Fe2+ tracer was added at two

Fe partitioning in the aqueous and goethite

1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

55

12

phases over 60 days. Less

Fe uptake occurred between 30 and 60 days than between

13

0 and 30 days, suggesting goethite recrystallization slowed with time. Fitting the data

14

with a box model indicated that 15% of the goethite recrystallized after 30 days of

15

reaction, and an additional 2% recrystallized between 30 and 60 days. The decreasing

16

susceptibility of goethite to recrystallize as it reacted with aqueous Fe2+ suggested that

17

recrystallization is likely only an important process over short time scales.

18

Introduction

19

Iron oxides and hydroxides are ubiquitous in natural systems, where they can act as sinks for

20

and sources of nutrients, metals, and environmental contaminants. 1–13 Iron oxides also serve

21

as geological proxies, as their isotopic and elemental compositions are used to reconstruct

22

the conditions under which they formed and subsequently weathered. 14–23 Recently, several

23

studies reported evidence of a new process by which iron oxides can interact with dissolved

24

species in aqueous environments. Iron oxides, such as goethite and hematite, may recrystal-

25

lize in anoxic aqueous systems in the presence of Fe2+ , as evidenced by rapid and extensive

26

changes in their Fe and O isotopic compositions and/or the structural incorporation or release

27

of trace elements. 24–36 This process, commonly referred to as Fe2+ -catalyzed recrystalliza-

28

tion, has been observed under apparent chemical equilibrium conditions that do not result

29

in overt changes to the solution chemistry 24,26–28,32,33,36 or the mineral structure, 26,32,33,36

30

morphology, 26,32,33 or dissolution behavior. 32,33 Since Fe2+ -catalyzed recrystallization can af-

31

fect the fate and mobility of micro nutrients (e.g., Zn and Ni) 28,31,37–40 and contaminants

32

(e.g., radionuclides) 41 as well as the isotopic compositions of iron oxides, it has important

33

implications for groundwater quality, contaminant remediation, biogeochemical cycling, and

34

paleoenvironmental reconstructions. Accounting for Fe2+ -catalyzed recrystallization in these

35

research areas is currently difficult, as it remains unclear how the susceptibility of iron oxides

36

to recrystallization changes over time.

37

Constraining the susceptibility of iron oxides to Fe2+ -catalyzed recrystallization is not 2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 35

Page 3 of 35

Environmental Science & Technology

38

straightforward due to conflicting observations and difficulties in modeling data. In a typi-

39

cal experiment, an iron oxide is exposed to an aqueous solution containing dissolved Fe2+ .

40

Initially, either the solid or aqueous Fe phase is enriched with an isotopic tracer (typically

41

55

Fe or

57

Fe) and isotopic mixing between the aqueous and solid phases is measured over

42

time. 24,26–29,31–33,36 Prior studies have observed that (1) isotopic mixing stopped within the

43

experimental period (400) in four samples: (i) unreacted goethite (ii) goethite reacted with aqueous

404

Fe2+ for 30 days, (iii) goethite reacted with aqueous Fe2+ for 60 days, and (iv) goethite in

405

Fe2+ -free buffer for 60 days. The results were consistent with our previous work that looked

406

at goethite particles over 30 days, 36 and therefore we only summarize the key findings here

407

(more details can be found in SI Section S3). In all four samples, the goethite consisted

408

of acicular nanoparticles. The particles became significantly wider between Day 0 (mean

409

width = 7.9±0.2 nm, ±standard error) and Day 60 (mean width = 9.1±0.1 nm). The length

410

of the particles was statistically similar at Day 0 (mean length = 60.3±1.4 nm) and Day

411

30 (mean length = 56.6±1.2 nm), but slightly lower at Day 60 (mean length = 51.3±1.3

412

nm). Overall, the anisotropic changes in the dimensions of the nanoparticles suggested that

413

recrystallization may have occurred through preferential growth on the edges (leading to the

414

increase in width) coupled to preferential dissolution from the tips.

415

We used mediated potentiometry to identify if ∆G0f,goethite changed over the course of 60

416

days when reacted with aqueous Fe2+ using conditions identical to those used for the

417

tracer experiments (details in SI Section S6). In an initial set of experiments, we determined

418

the ∆G0f,goethite of the original goethite by measuring reduction potential (EH ) values of

419

goethite and aqueous Fe2+ suspensions at pH 6.0 and 7.5 as a function of aqueous Fe2+

20

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

55

Fe

Page 21 of 35

420

Environmental Science & Technology

activity (SI Section S6.4). The relevant half reaction is: 55 α−FeOOH(s) + e− + 3 H+ ⇀ ↽ Fe2+ (aq) + 2 H2 O

(6)

421

The measured EH values depend on solution pH and aqueous Fe2+ activity, as described by

422

the following Nernst equation (SI Section S6.4): EH = EH0 −

RT RT ln{Fe2+ ln{H+ } (aq) } + 3 F F

(7)

423

where R is the ideal gas constant, T is absolute temperature, F is the Faraday constant, EH0

424

is the standard reduction potential, and curly brackets denote activity. We fit the data by

425

0 floating the EH0 and the slopes of the {Fe2+ aq } activity and pH. The best fit resulted in an EH

426

value of 897 mV, a slope of –53.9 for the Fe2+ aq term, and a slope of –183.8 for the pH term

427

(χ2 =94.2, SI Section S6.4). The slope values for Fe2+ aq and pH are in good agreement with

428

◦ the theoretical values (-59 mV for the Fe2+ aq term and –177 mV for the pH term at 25 C),

429

consistent with our previous work on micron-scale goethite. 55 The deviations between the

430

measured and theoretical slopes were most likely due to experimental error; therefore, we

431

fit the data assuming using the theoretical slopes, yielding a EH0 value of 861±1 mV for the

432

original nanoparticulate goethite and a ∆G0f,goethite value of –481.2±0.1 kJ/mol (SI Section

433

S6.5).

434

The ∆G0f,goethite of nanoparticulate goethite in this study was more positive than reported

435

values for micron-scale goethite (–490.6±1.5 kJ/mol, 69 –490.2±0.1 kJ/mol 55 ), which was

436

consistent with the fact that nanoparticles have higher surface energies. 69–72 We calculated

437

a theoretical ∆G0f,goethite that accounted for surface enthalpy using reference values from

438

the literature, 69 which yielded a value of –485.9±1.7 kJ/mol based on the BET measured

439

specific surface area and a value of –475.4±1.6 kJ/mol based on TEM estimated specific

440

surface area (SI Section S6.7). The relatively good agreement between the theoretical and

441

measured ∆G0f,goethite values coupled with the ability of the Nernst equation to describe the 21

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Environmental Science & Technology

442

EH data suggested that the goethite-Fe2+ suspensions were at a metastable equilibrium state.

443

We then measured how the ∆G0f,goethite changed over the course of the 60 day experiment

444

to identify if recrystallization induced any detectable thermodynamic changes. The measured

445

∆G0f,goethite on Day 1 (–481.1±0.1 kJ/mol) and Day 60 (–480.9±0.2 kJ/mol) were the same

446

within error, but the ∆G0f,goethite at intermediate time points slightly differed (