Synergistic effects of nitrogen and potassium on ... - ACS Publications

limitations to photosynthesis in rice (Oryza sativa L.) 2. Wenfeng Hou,1 Jinyao Yan,1 Bálint Jákli,2 Jianwei Lu,1 Tao Ren,1 Rihuan Cong,1. 3. Xiaoku...
1 downloads 4 Views 1MB Size
Subscriber access provided by Kaohsiung Medical University

Agricultural and Environmental Chemistry

Synergistic effects of nitrogen and potassium on quantitative limitations to photosynthesis in rice (Oryza sativa L.) Wenfeng Hou, Jinyao Yan, Bálint Jákli, Jianwei Lu, Tao Ren, Rihuan Cong, and Xiaokun Li J. Agric. Food Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b01135 • Publication Date (Web): 01 May 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on May 4, 2018

Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.

is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.

Page 1 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

1

Synergistic effects of nitrogen and potassium on quantitative

2

limitations to photosynthesis in rice (Oryza sativa L.)

3

Wenfeng Hou,1 Jinyao Yan,1 Bálint Jákli,2 Jianwei Lu,1 Tao Ren,1 Rihuan Cong,1

4

Xiaokun Li*1

5

1

6

Yangtze River), Ministry of Agriculture/Microelement Research Center/College of

7

Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070,

8

China

9

2

10

Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation (Middle and Lower Reaches of

Institute of Applied Plant Nutrition, University of Göttingen, Carl-Sprengel-Weg 1,

37075 Göttingen, Germany

1

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

11

ABSTRACT: The inhibition of the net CO2 assimilation (A) during photosynthesis is

12

one of the major physiological effects of both nitrogen (N) and potassium (K)

13

deficiencies on rice growth. Whether the reduction in A arises from a limitation in

14

either the diffusion and biochemical fixation of CO2 or photochemical energy

15

conversion is still debated in relation to N and K deficiencies. In this study, the gas

16

exchange parameters of rice under different N and K levels were evaluated, and

17

limitations within the photosynthetic carbon capture process were quantified. A was

18

increased by 17.3% and 12.1% for the supply of N and K. The suitable N/K ratio

19

should be maintained from 1.42 to 1.50. The limitation results indicated that A is

20

primarily limited by biochemical process. The stomatal conductance (LS), mesophyll

21

conductance (LM) and biochemical (LB) limitations were regulated by 26.6-79.9%,

22

24.4-54.1% and 44.1-75.2%, respectively, with the N and K supply.

23

KEYWORDS: nitrogen, potassium, rice, photosynthesis, limitation

2

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 2 of 33

Page 3 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

24

1. INTRODUCTION

25

The global demand for food is expected to increase by 85% by 2050 relative to 2013,

26

implying a need to improve the efficiency of agricultural production.1 Rice (Oryza

27

sativa L.) is the staple food for more than 50% of the global population.2 To ensure

28

future food security in Asia, Africa and Latin America, the production of rice is of

29

central importance.1,3 Improving photosynthetic efficiency is regarded as one of the

30

major targets for enhancing yield potentials, because over 90% of the crop biomass is

31

derived from the products of photosynthesis.4-6 Photosynthesis is sensitive to the

32

availability of essential mineral nutrients.7 Among them, nitrogen (N) and potassium

33

(K) are present in the highest quantities within photosynthetic tissues.7-8 A deficiency

34

of either N or K eventually results in a substantial decline in photosynthetic carbon

35

assimilation.9-11

36

More than half of the leaf N is allocated to the photosynthetic apparatus, and

37

deficient N concentrations in the photosynthetic tissues limit the net CO2 assimilation

38

rate (A). Several mechanisms contribute to the overall decline in A under N deficiency.

39

N is a substantial part of the chlorophyll molecule and is therefore involved in the

40

photochemical absorbance of light energy that is utilized during photosynthesis.12-13 N

41

is crucial for the production of proteins and the regulation of enzyme activity. 14-15 As

42

a consequence, N deficiency inhibits the activity of the CO2-fixing enzyme ribulose

43

bisphosphate

44

accelerates leaf senescence, reducing the effective carbon assimilation period of each

45

leaf and therefore the accumulation of photosynthetic products.15, 18-19 Additionally, N

46

deficiency is associated with reduced stomatal conductance and an inhibition of the

47

leaf area expansion.20

48

carboxylase/oxygenase

(Rubisco).16-17

Moreover,

N

deficiency

In contrast to N, K is not covalently bound in organic molecules, but it is the most 3

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

49

abundant cellular cation and therefore mediates plant homeostasis by regulating

50

stomatal movement, osmotic adjustment, the electric charge balance and enzyme

51

activation.21-22 Furthermore, K is critically involved in the maintenance of

52

photosynthesis. It has frequently been shown that the leaf stomatal conductance (gs) is

53

reduced when the K concentrations in the leaf tissue are low.23-24, 26 However, recent

54

studies indicate that A is not primarily limited by gs, but rather by the reduced

55

conductance of the leaf mesophyll to CO2 diffusion (i.e., mesophyll conductance, gm),

56

limiting the quantity of CO2 that is available for carboxylation.23-26 In addition to the

57

constraints on CO2 diffusion, K deficiency limits the biochemical capacity for

58

photosynthesis by reducing the activity of Rubsico.26-28 Additionally, increased

59

production rates of reactive oxygen species accelerate chloroplast degradation and

60

therefore reduce the overall capacity for photochemical energy conversion, the rate of

61

electron transport and eventually carboxylation.23, 26, 29

62

Apart from photosynthesis, numerous studies report significant interaction effects

63

for N and K on the crop growth and yield.30-31 Although their individual functions in

64

photosynthesis are intensively studied, the synergistic effects of N and K on A are still

65

not well understood. As described above, A can be limited by CO2 diffusion (gs, gm),

66

by the biochemical capacity or by a combination of these factors. Previous studies

67

have systematically addressed the individual effects of N and K on photosynthesis,

68

and they have quantified the stomatal, mesophyll and biochemical limitations to

69

A.23-24, 26 However, the fractional contribution of each individual factor to the overall

70

limitation of photosynthesis has not been quantified to date with respect to the

71

interactions of N and K nutrition.

72

Therefore, to improve the current knowledge of synergistic N and K effects on rice

73

photosynthesis, a field experiment was conducted with different combinations of N 4

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 4 of 33

Page 5 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

74

and K fertilization to evaluate the combined effects of the N and K tissue status on the

75

specific limitations in photosynthesis in a quantitative manner. This knowledge will

76

help investigators to develop a better understanding of the mechanisms by which the

77

combined use of N and K could have different effects compared with the supply of

78

only N or K. In addition, this knowledge will enable better guidance in relation to rice

79

photosynthesis and productivity to the supply of N and K. The primary objectives of

80

the current study were to (1) evaluate the synergistic effects of N and K on the A of

81

rice leaves; (2) quantify the photosynthetic limitation by using the gs, gm and the

82

biochemical capacity; and (3) identify the optimal ratio of N to K concentrations in

83

the photosynthetically active tissue that will minimize the limitation in A.

84

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

85

2.1. Study Site. In 2016, rice (Oryza sativa L. var. Shenliangyou 5814) was

86

grown as part of a field experiment that was conducted in Wuxue county, Hubei

87

province, central China (30°06'46''N, 115°36'9''E), which is the major production area

88

for rice. The average temperature and total precipitation during the rice growing

89

season were 27.7 °C and 1118.3 mm, which are typical for a subtropical monsoon

90

climate. The plants were grown in a sandy loam soil with the following characteristics:

91

clay 16.4%, silt 36.8%, sand 46.8%, pH 5.8 (soil: water = 1: 2.5), organic matter

92

content 32.1 g kg-1, total N 1.8 g kg-1, Olsen-P 13.4 mg kg-1, readily available K 44.5

93

mg kg-1, slowly available K 302.5 mg kg-1, and cation exchange capacity 4.0 cmol

94

kg-1.

95

2.2. Experimental Design. The field experiment was designed as a spilt-plot

96

experiment with different N and K fertilizer rates. The N treatments were 0 kg N ha-1

97

(NL), 180 kg N ha-1 (NM) and 270 kg N ha-1 (NH). The K treatments were 0 kg K2O

98

ha-1 (KL), 120 kg K2O ha-1 (KM) and 180 kg K2O ha-1 (KH). The N fertilizer was 5

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

99

applied in three doses, with 50% as basal fertilizer, 25% at the tillering stage and 25%

100

at the filling stage. The P fertilizer for all the treatments was applied as basal fertilizer

101

in a single dose of 90 kg P2O5 ha-1. The K fertilizer was applied in two doses, with 75%

102

as basal fertilizer and 25% at the filling stage. Urea (46% N), superphosphate (12%

103

P2O5) and potassium chloride (60% K2O) were used as N, P and K fertilizers. All the

104

plots were plowed and leveled after the application of basal fertilizer. The plot area

105

was 20 m2 (4 × 5 m). All the possible combinations of the N and K fertilization levels

106

were present in the experiment, resulting in a total number of 9 individual treatments,

107

with each of them repeated three times.

108

2.3. Crop Cultivation. The seeds were sown on May 22 and transplanted on June

109

29 with a hill space of (24×15) cm. The plots were separated by soil banks, which

110

were covered with plastic film to prevent the exchange of water and fertilizer between

111

neighboring plots. The seeds and plants were treated with fungicides, insecticides and

112

herbicides to avoid yield losses. No obvious diseases, pests or weeds occurred during

113

the rice growing season. The plants were harvested on October 1.

114

2.4. Leaf Gas Exchange Measurements. To study the effects of the N and K

115

supply on the diffusional and biochemical limitations to CO2 assimilation, the leaf gas

116

exchange of flag leaves was measured in the field with a Li-6400XT portable

117

photosynthesis system (Li-6400XT, Li-Cor, Inc, Lincoln, USA) at the jointing stage,

118

at 65 days after sowing. The measurements were performed during the morning

119

(8:00-11:00) of a sunny day. The cuvette conditions were set to 1200 µmol m-2 s-1

120

photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD), 400 µmol m-2 s-1 CO2 in the leaf chamber

121

(Ca), 60% relative humidity, and 500 µmol s-1 flow rate. The temperature was not

122

controlled, and it was 30.0 °C.

123

The CO2 response curves (A-Ci curves, where A is the net photosynthesis rate and 6

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Page 6 of 33

Page 7 of 33

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

124

Ci is the CO2 concentration in the leaf internal air space) were measured after the

125

leaves had been adapted to the cuvette conditions for twenty minutes. Then, the Ca in

126

the gas exchange cuvette was reduced stepwise from 400 to 300, 200, 100 and 50

127

µmol m-2 s-1, and then increased again from 50 to 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200 and 1500.

128

The A, Ci and stomatal conductance (gs) were recorded for each step of the CO2

129

response curves once a steady value for A was reached. The mesophyll conductance

130

(gm), CO2 concentration in the chloroplast stroma (Cc) and the transformation of the

131

A-Ci curves into A-Cc curves were computed as described by Sharkey.35 The

132

maximum rate of Rubisco-catalyzed carboxylation (Vcmax) and the maximum rate of

133

electron transport (Jmax) were calculated as defined by Farquhar, von Caemmerer and

134

Berry.36

135

Based on the limitation analyses presented by Jones36, the limitations to A were

136

separated into the stomatal diffusion (LS), mesophyll diffusion (LM) and biochemical

137

capacity (LB).37-38 The limitation of A can be approximated as follows:

138 139

ls =

140

lm =

141

lb =

142

where gtot is the total conductance to CO2 diffusion from ambient air into the

143

chloroplast, as defined as follows:

. LS, LM and LB are stomatal,

144

mesophyll and biochemical limitations to A, respectively, and ls, lm, and lb are the

145

corresponding relative limitations (with values from 0 to 1). All the limitations are

146

expressed on the basis of the deviation of the observed A from non-limited A (i.e., the

147

average A of the optimal fertilized NHKH treatment, where the total limitation is 0). 7

ACS Paragon Plus Environment

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

148

2.5.

Determination

of

Rubisco

Enzyme

Activity.

Page 8 of 33

The

extraction

of

149

ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco, EC 4.1.1.39) was

150

prepared according to Lu et al.30 Fresh leaves (0.15 g) were ground into powder in a

151

chilled mortar with some liquid N2 and quartz sand. The powders were homogenized

152

with 4 ml of cool extraction buffer containing 1 mM EDTA, 1% PVP (w/v), 10 mM

153

β-mercaptoethanol (v/v), 10 mM MgCl2, 12.5% glycerol (v/v) and 50 mM Tris-HCl

154

(pH 7.5) at 4 °C. The homogenates were transferred from the mortar into centrifuge

155

tubes and centrifuged for 15 min at 4 °C and 15000 g. The supernatant was

156

immediately tested for Rubisco activity using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

157

method with a Rubisco assay kit (Beijing Solarbio Science and Technology Co., Ltd,

158

China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

159

2.6. Nitrogen and Potassium Concentration Measurements. Three representative

160

hills were sampled from each plot directly after the measurement of the gas exchange.

161

The leaves of each plant were cut off and the leaf area was measured using ImageJ

162

software.39 The plant samples were desiccated at 105 °C for half an hour and then

163

dried at 65 °C for 48 h. The dried samples were weighed and milled. Then, 0.10 g of

164

each sample was digested with H2SO4-H2O2.40 The N concentration in the digestion

165

solution was determined with a continuous flow analyzer (AA3, Seal Analytical Inc.,

166

Southampton, UK), and the K concentration in the digestion solution was determined

167

with a flame photometer (M-410, Cole-Parmer, Chicago, USA).

168

2.7. Statistical Analysis. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was calculated using

169

SPSS 18.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). The differences between the mean values were

170

compared using Duncan's multiple range test at a P