Synthesis and Preliminary Biophysical and Cellular Evaluation of

7 hours ago - acronycine may interact with DNA, either by intercalation or by some other noncovalent ... days, the cells were then incubated with MTS ...
0 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size
This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License, which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.

Article Cite This: ACS Omega 2019, 4, 6106−6113

http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf

Synthesis and Preliminary Biophysical and Cellular Evaluation of Some Ring-Enlarged Analogues of the Anti-Tumor Plant Alkaloid Acronycine Jeet Banerjee,† Indranil Kundu,† Shengyi Zhang,‡ Shijun Wen,‡ and Shital K. Chattopadhyay*,† †

Department of Chemistry, University of Kalyani, Kalyani 741235, West Bengal, India Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China



Downloaded via 109.94.221.209 on April 1, 2019 at 19:23:54 (UTC). See https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines for options on how to legitimately share published articles.

S Supporting Information *

ABSTRACT: Three oxepinoacridine analogues of the important anti-cancer pyranoacridine natural product acronycine have been synthesized using a combined Claisen rearrangement ring-closing metathesis sequence as key steps to install the oxacyclic ring. Preliminary biophysical studies of these proposed oxepino analogues revealed that they interact with ct-DNA in a manner similar to the pyranoacridones but not possibly as intercalators. Cellular evaluations of these analogues in two human leukemic cell lines have also been carried out. These studies indicate that the ring-enlarged analogues have somewhat lower activity than the naturally occurring ones in the cell lines studied.

1. INTRODUCTION

unreported compounds and their preliminary biological evaluations.

The pyranoacridone alkaloid Acronycine (1, Figure 1) was isolated1 from an Australian scrub, which exhibited broad spectrum antitumor activity with moderate to good potency.2 This alkaloid was in clinical trials3 for some time, but because of its poor aqueous solubility, physicochemical properties, and slight toxicity, the trial was discontinued. In quest for a drug with better properties, several analogues of this compound have been prepared and biologically evaluated.4 For example, the cis-1,2-dihydroxyacronycine derivative 5, its diacetate derivative 6, and the epoxy acronycine derivative 4 having a modified pyran ring were all shown to possess improved activity and better pharmacological properties.5 It has also been noticed that compounds lacking the pyran ring are devoid of any useful level of biological activity.6 Additionally, the linear- and angularly benzofused acronycines 2, 3, and 7 were synthesized and evaluated.7 It was observed that the benzoanalogue diacetate derivative 7 possesses remarkable activity and it is found to have comparable efficiency to some wellknown anti-cancer drugs. It is now undergoing clinical trials. On the other hand, ring-enlarged acronycine derivatives remain to be explored as possible analogues. We became interested to evaluate the oxepine derivatives 8−10 in this regard, wherein other parameters of the successful drugs, that is, a 1-methoxyacridone unit, an endocyclic-conjugated double bond, a gemdimethyl unit, a vicinal diol, or a diacetate unit in 1,2-relation all have been kept unaltered excepting replacement of the pyran ring by a seven-membered oxacyclic ring. Herein, we describe synthesis of these hitherto © 2019 American Chemical Society

2. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 2.1. Synthesis. Medium-ring-sized oxacycle synthesis has greatly advanced with the advent of the powerful ring-closing metathesis reaction.8 We, 9 and others,10 have earlier demonstrated the efficacy of a combined Claisen rearrangement-ring closing metathesis sequence for the synthesis of benz-annulated oxepine derivatives. We adopted our methodology for the synthesis of the projected oxepinoacridine derivatives 8−10. Thus, the known 1,3-dihydroxyacridone derivative 11 (Scheme 1) was selectively allylated at the 3hydroxy group under mild conditions to provide the corresponding 3-allyloxy derivative 12 in a moderate yield of 64%. It was then N,O-dimethylated under conventional conditions to give the N,O,O-trialkylated compound 13 in good yield. The Claisen rearrangement of 13 was found to proceed better in refluxing N,N-diethylaniline within 6 h to provide the angularly rearranged product 14 (64%) together with some unreacted ether (15%). Prolonged heating results in complete conversion but formation of some unwanted linearly rearranged regio-isomer was noticed. Installation of the gemdimethylallyl unit in the phenolic oxygen in 14 was achieved using a two-step sequence involving alkylation with 3-chloro-3methyl-but-1-yne leading to the propargyl derivative 15 Received: December 30, 2018 Accepted: March 13, 2019 Published: April 1, 2019 6106

DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b03673 ACS Omega 2019, 4, 6106−6113

ACS Omega

Article

Figure 1. Anti-cancer natural product acronycine and its analogues.

Scheme 1. (i) Allyl Bromide, K2CO3, DMF, rt, 6 h, 64%; (ii) NaH, Me2SO4, DMF, 0 °C to rt, 3 h, 86%; (iii) N,NDiethylaniline, Reflux, 1 h, 65%; (iv) 3-Chloro-3-methyl-1-butyne, KI, K2CO3, DMF, 65−130 °C, 22 h, 69%; (v) H2, Lindlar’s Catalyst, THF, rt, 6−8 h, 72%; (vi) Grubbs’ 2nd Generation Catalyst 17, Toluene, 80 °C, 74%; (vii) Ru(CO)HCl(PPh3)3, Toluene, 80 °C, 24 h, 79%; (viii) OsO4, NMMO, Acetone−Water, rt, 18 h, 74%; (ix) Ac2O, DMAP, DCM, rt, 18 h, 84%

Scheme 2. Preparation of Acronycine and Its Derivatives

the Grubbs second generation catalyst [(1,3-bis-(2,4,6trimethylphenyl)-2-imidazolidinylidene)dichloro (phenylmethylene) (trichlorohexylphosphne) ruthenium, 17]in toluene at elevated temperature and prolonged reaction time provided the desired ring-closed product 18 in an acceptable yield of 74%. The 3,4-double bond of the oxepine ring in 18 was brought to conjugation employing another ruthenium catalyst to obtain the desired ring-enlarged acronycine derivative 8 in good yield. Compound 8 could also be

followed by semi-hydrogenation of the triple bond in the latter to provide the desired dimethylallyl ether 16 in good yield. Although a great variety of pyran and furan rings have been constructed11 by RCM methodology using Grubbs’ 1st or 2nd generation catalysts, examples of formation of the higher ring with a gem-dimethyl unit,12 are indeed less documented. The RCM reaction of compound 16 was first attempted with the GI catalyst under a range of conditions. However, very little conversion was observed in all such attempts. Pleasingly, use of 6107

DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b03673 ACS Omega 2019, 4, 6106−6113

ACS Omega

Article

Figure 2. Absorption spectra of 1 (50 μM) in presence of ct-DNA (0−373 μM) and absorption spectra of 8 (50 μM) in presence of ct-DNA (0− 373 μM).

obtained in a one-pot manner without isolation of 18 with similar overall yield. Osmium teroxide-catalyzed dihydrolyxation of the alkene 8 proceeded uneventfully to provide the diol 9 in good yield. Subsequent diacetylation of the later smoothly provided the proposed analogue 10. Acronycine (1), its diol 5 and the corresponding diacetate derivative 6 were prepared following literature13 as outlined in Scheme 2. These were used in subsequent biological studies for comparison under identical conditions. 2.2. Biophysical Studies. Dorr and Liddil studied14 the interaction of acronycine with DNA and concluded that acronycine may interact with DNA, either by intercalation or by some other noncovalent process. Subsequent studies revealed15 that 1,2-dioxygenated acronycine derivatives 4−6 behave as DNA-alkylating agent and interact with amino group of guanine N-2 in the minor groove. The diacetate derivative 6 exhibited comparable/better activity than taxol against human ovarian, lung, and colon cancers. The oxygenated pentacyclic compounds of the type 7 behave similarly or even better. We studied the interaction of the oxepino compounds 8−10 and compared their behavior with those of the pyran derivatives 1, 5, and 6 under an identical setup to understand if any subtlety is associated in the change from pyran to oxepine ring. The results are presented below. At first, we measured the absorption and emission spectra (in the absence and presence of ct-DNA) of the abovementioned compounds. Compound 1 showed absorption maxima at λ = 270 nm with a shoulder at 279 nm while compound 8 showed absorption maxima at λ = 272 nm. Now, with increasing the concentration of ct-DNA the peak intensity of both the compounds gradually decreased (Figure 2). At higher concentration of DNA, the peak at λ = 270 nm became blue-shifted at λ = 250 nm, while the overlapping one shifted at λ = 285 nm. Whereas, in the case of compound 8, at higher concentration of DNA, the peak at λ = 272 nm disappeared and two distinct peaks appeared at λ = 236 and 288 nm. Thus, at higher concentration of ct-DNA the visualization of two distinct peaks of compound 1 and compound 8 indicates strong perturbation of the electronic states of the compound in presence of DNA in a similar fashion. The diol pair 5 & 9 and the diacetate pair 6 & 10 behaved similarly (see Supporting Information for graphs) both showing similar trends in shifting of absorption maxima. The data are appended below (Table 1). We then studied16 the DNA interaction of the two sets of compounds with respect to emission behavior. In aqueous buffer medium emission maxima appears at λ = 450 nm for compound 1 and λ = 467 nm for compound 8 (Figure 3).

Table 1. UV Data for Compounds 5, 6, 9, and 10 compound

λmax (nm)

pyranodiol 5 oxepinodiol 9 pyranodiacetate 6 oxepinodiacetate 10

274 265, 270 (shoulder) 273 269

new peak values (nm) 243 238 241 245

and and and and

279 283 282 276

Here, again with increasing concentration of ct-DNA the emission intensity drops down. The fluorescence quenching by DNA indicated that the compounds had binding with DNA. The binding constant was found to be Ka = 0.146 × 104 M−1 for compound 1, while Ka = 1.026 × 104 M−1 for compound 8. Similar behavior of the diol pair 5 & 9 and the diacetate pair 6 & 10 were observed. A tabular comparison of the photophysical behavior of all the compounds are presented in Table 2. To predict the possible mode of binding, we performed the thermal denaturation study of our synthesized compound with ct-DNA. Significant stabilization of the double helix is commonly observed for intercalating ligands, whereas groove binders may lead to stabilization or destabilization or negligible change in the melting temperature (Tm) of double-stranded DNA.17 For ct-DNA, in 1 mM sodium cacodylate buffer the melting temperature (Tm) was measured to be 56 °C. Melting temperatures of all the compounds are listed in Table 3 (see the Supporting Information for the graphs). These studies indicate that the mode of binding is other than intercalation. 2.3. Cell Viability Analysis. Most of the earlier studies on acronycine derivatives and their benz-annulated analogues have been carried out on murine leukemia cell line L1210 and human epidermoid carcinoma cell line KB 3-1. The present study was carried out on two human leukemic cell lines MV411(acute myeloid leukemia) and ML-1(acute myeloblastic leukemia). Drug-related effects on cell viability were assessed by the MTS cell proliferation assay (Promega, Madison, WI). Cancer cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 3.0 × 103 cells/well for drug treatment. After the treatment for 3 days, the cells were then incubated with MTS (3-(4,5dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium) for 3−4 h at 37 °C. The spectrophotometric absorbance in each well at 490 nm to record the relevant cell viability was measured using a microplate reader (SpectraMax M5, Molecular Devices). The cell viability data is presented in the Table 4. It is observed that the data for the pyran derivatives are somewhat better than those for the oxepine derivatives, and the acetates are the best among the three in each series. The 6108

DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b03673 ACS Omega 2019, 4, 6106−6113

ACS Omega

Article

Figure 3. (A) Emission spectra of compound 1 in the presence of ct-DNA (0−42.6 μM) with excitation at λmax = 270 nm. (B) Emission spectra of compound 8 in presence of ct-DNA (0−82.7 μM) with excitation at λmax = 272 nm.

Table 2. Summary of Photophysical Data of the Projected Compounds compound

absorption (nm) 270 272 274 265 273 269

1 8 5 9 6 10

emission (nm)

ε (M−1 L−1)

450 467 453 463 445 453

× × × × × ×

2.5 3.2 4.7 3.7 3.6 3.8

Tm (°C)

ΔTm (°C)

1 8 5 9 6 10

59.8 54.7 50 53 50.5 45.4

3.8 −1.3 −6 −3 −5.5 −10.6

0.146 1.026 1.98 0.64 1.37 1.44

10 104 104 104 104 104

× × × × × ×

quantum yield (φ)

104 104 104 104 104 104

0.40 0.32 0.55 0.62 0.54 0.56

further studies are required to fully explore the potential of the prepared oxepinoacridine derivatives in other cell lines.

Table 3. DNA Melting Temperature Data for the Three Pairs of Targeted Compounds Compound with ct-DNA

binding constant (M−1)

4

4. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION 4.1. General. Infrared spectra were recorded with a PerkinElmer Infrared Spectrometer model No L120−000A. 1 H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded with a Bruker400 MHz Ultrashield NMR spectrometer purchased through a DST-PURSE grant. Mass spectra were recorded with a Water Xevo QTOF mass spectrometer purchased through the DSTFIST grant. Elemental analysis was performed with a PerkinElmer 2400 series II Instrument. All solvents obtained from commercial sources were dried with appropriate drying agents and were immediately distilled before use. Column chromatography was performed with silica gel (230−400) purchased from Spectrochem India Pvt. Ltd. Thin-layer chromatography was performed with precoated silica plates and was visualized under a UV lamp or with an iodine spray. Melting points were determined in open capillaries and are uncorrected. 4.1.1. 3-Allyloxy-1-hydroxy-10H-acridin-9-one (12). To a stirring solution of 1,3-dihydroxy-10H-acridin-9-one (5 g, 22 mmol) (1) in dry DMF (35 mL), potassium carbonate (6.1 g, 44 mmol) was added in a single portion. The reaction mixture was allowed to stir for 15−20 min at room temperature under nitrogen atmosphere. Allyl bromide (3.45 mL, 40 mmol) was added slowly to the reaction mixture over twenty minutes and stirring continued for 3 h. It was then poured in a beaker over ice with constant stirring and then extracted with chloroform (2 × 50 mL). The combined organic layer was washed with

inhibitory rates of MV411 and ML1 by the pyran derivative 6 are best, being 63.1 and 57.03% at 30 μM.

3. CONCLUSIONS Oxepinoacridone analogues of the important anti-cancer pyranoacridone alkaloid acronycine have been prepared for the first time, involving our previously developed domino Claisen rearrangement-RCM sequence as key steps. Preliminary biophysical evaluation of three such analogues involving the interaction with ct-DNA by UV and fluorescence studies has been carried out in a comparative basis with the corresponding pyranoacridine natural product and two of its derivatives. The studies further corroborate that the apparently flat molecules perhaps are not DNA intercalators. Cellular evaluation of the two series of compounds with two human leukemic cell lines MV411 and ML1 have also been carried out. Cellular data indicate that the activities of the pyran compounds are better than those of the oxepine compounds in the particular cell lines studied. However,

Table 4. Cell Viability Data of the Three Pairs of Targeted Compounds against Cell Lines MV4-11 and ML-1 1

5

6

8

9

10

cell line

10 μm

30 μm

10 μm

30 μm

10 μm

30 μm

10 μm

30 μm

10 μm

30 μm

10 μm

30 μm

MV4-11 ML-1

0.9089 0.7355

0.7757 0.8618

1.1889 1.1526

1.2379 1.1048

0.8471 0.7150

0.6032 0.4807

1.2829 1.1095

0.7908 0.7363

1.3389 1.1086

1.0058 1.0304

1.1893 1.0550

0.7045 0.6982

6109

DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b03673 ACS Omega 2019, 4, 6106−6113

ACS Omega

Article

94.0, 55.4, 44.6, 31.5. MS (QTOF ES+): found, 296.1274 [M+ + H]; calcd for C18H18NO3, 296.1287. 4.1.4. 4-Allyl-3-(1,1-dimethyl-prop-2-ynyloxy)-1-methoxy10-methyl-10H-acridin-9-one (15). A solution of compound 14 (0.50 g, 1.7 mmol) in dry DMF (10 mL) was stirred and heated at 65 °C under nitrogen atmosphere in presence of K2CO3 (0.47 g, 3.4 mmol) for 15 min. Then KI (0.56 g, 3.4 mmol) and 3-chloro-3-methyl-1-butyne (0.5 mL, 4.3 mmol) were sequentially added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 22 h before being cooled. It was diluted with water and extracted with CH2Cl2 (2 × 20 mL). The combined organic layer was washed with water (25 mL), brine (25 mL), and then dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. It was filtered and the filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure to leave a crude mass that was purified by column chromatography over silica gel using a mixture of ethyl acetate and petroleum ether (1:4) to give the product as a yellowish solid (0.424 g, 69%). Melting point: 200−202 °C. IR (KBr): ν 3185, 2934, 2098, 1637, 1600, 1579, 1495 cm−1.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.24 (1H, dd, J = 7.6, 1.2 Hz, −ArH), 7.53 (1H, dt, J = 1.2, 8.0 Hz, −ArH), 7.24 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.19 (1H, s, −ArH), 7.12 (1H, t, J = 7.6 Hz, −ArH), 6.02 (1H, m, CH), 5.03 (2H, m, CH2), 3.92 (3H, s, −OMe), 3.66 (3H, s, −NMe), 3.42 (2H, t, J = 2.8 Hz, −CH2), 2.65 (1H, s, acetylenic), 1.67 (6H, s, −C(Me)2). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 178.3, 160.2, 160.0, 149.9, 145.7, 137.3, 132.6, 126.9, 125.3, 121.4, 116.3, 115.2, 111.9, 109.8, 95.9, 85.8, 74.6, 72.3, 56.2, 45.1, 32.6, 29.7. MS (QTOF ES+): found, 362.1754 [M+ + H]; calcd for C23H24NO3, 362.1756. 4.1.5. 4-Allyl-3-(1,1-dimethyl-allyloxy)-1-methoxy-10methyl-10H-acridin-9-one (16). A heterogeneous mixture of the compound 15 (0.25 g,0.69 mmol) and 10 mol % Lindler’s catalyst (15 mg, 10 mol %) in dry tetrahydrofuran (THF) (10 mL) was vigorously stirred in a hydrogen atmosphere at room temperature for 6−8 h under balloon pressure. The reaction mixture was filtered through a bed of Celite, the filter cake was washed with THF (10 mL) and the combined filtrate was concentrated in vacuo to afford the product as a yellowish crude, which was purified by column chromatography over silica gel (100−200 mesh) (ethyl acetate:petroleum ether = 40:60) to give the product as an yellow gum (0.18 g, 72%). IR (KBr): 2921, 1623, 1602 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.23 (1H, dd, J = 8.0, 1.6 Hz, −ArH), 7.58 (1H, m, −ArH), 7.30 (1H, m, −ArH), 7.19 (1H, t, J = 7.2 Hz, −ArH), 6.69 (1H, s, −ArH), 6.24 (1H, dd, J = 10.8, 17.6 Hz, CH), 6.13 (1H, m, CH), 5.31−5.24 (2H, m, CH2), 5.13−5.08 (2H, m, CH2), 3.87 (3H, s, −OMe), 3.73 (3H, s, −NMe), 3.51 (2H, d, J = 5.2 Hz, −ArCH2), 1.57 (6H, s, −C(Me)2). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 178.2, 160.9, 160.0, 149.9, 145.7, 145.0, 137.5, 132.6, 126.9, 125.2, 121.3, 116.3, 115.0, 113.3, 111.4, 109.6, 96.1, 80.8, 56.1, 45.2, 32.8, 27.3. MS (QTOF ES+): found, 364.1929 [M+ + H]; calcd for C23H26NO3, 364.1913. 4.1.6. 7-Methoxy-4,4,13-trimethyl-1,13-dihydro-4H-5-oxa13-aza-cyclohept[a]anthracen-8-one (18). To a solution of the diene 16 (0.110 g, 0.30 mmol) in dry toluene (5 mL) catalyst 17 (8 mg, 3 mol %) was added under argon atmosphere and the resulting reaction mixture was stirred at 90 °C for 24 h. It was allowed to come to rt and then concentrated in vacuo to afford a brownish crude, which was purified by column chromatography over silica gel using a mixture of ethyl acetate and petroleum ether (40:60) to give the product as yellow solid (0.073 g,74%). Melting point: 102

water (25 mL), brine (25 mL), and then dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. It was filtered and the filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure to leave a crude mass that was purified by column chromatography over silica gel using a mixture of chloroform and methanol (5:1) to give the product as a yellow solid (3.56 g, 64%). Melting point: 250−252 °C. IR (KBr): ν 3150, 2957, 1655, 1609, 1587, 1479 1455, 1181 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 14.23 (1H, s, −OH), 11.95 (1H, s, −NH), 8.17 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, −ArH), 7.75 (1H, s, −ArH), 7.50 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, −ArH), 7.29 (1H, d, J = 7.2 Hz, −ArH), 6.40 (1H, s, −ArH), 6.19 (1H, s, −ArH), 6.18− 6.02 (1H, m, CH), 5.45 (1H, d, J = 17.2 Hz, CH2), 5.32 (1H, d, J = 10.8 Hz, CH2), 4.68 (2H, d, J = 4.4 Hz, −OCH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 180.2, 164.1, 163.4, 143.0, 140.7, 134.0, 133.0, 125.0, 121.4, 118.9, 118.0, 117.0, 104.0, 94.8, 90.9, 68.4. HRMS (QTOF ESMS+): found, 268.0966 [M+ + H]; calcd for C16H14NO3, 268.0974. 4.1.2. 3-Allyloxy-1-methoxy-10-methyl-10H-acridin-9-one (13). To a stirred suspension of NaH (60%, 1.55 g, 67.4 mmol) dry DMF (15 mL) under nitrogen atmosphere at 0 °C, compound 12 (4.0 g, 15.0 mmol) was added in a portion wise manner over 15 min. The resulting greenish mixture was allowed to stir for another 20−30 min at 0 °C followed by drop wise addition of dimethyl sulfate (2.8 mL, 29.5 mmol). The reaction mixture was allowed to come to room temperature and stirred for an additional 2 h. It was then quenched by adding cold saturated solution (10 mL) of ammonium chloride at 0 °C before being extracted with CHCl3 (2 × 50 mL). The combined organic layer was washed with water (25 mL), brine (25 mL), and then dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. It was filtered and the filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure to leave a crude mass that was purified by column chromatography over silica gel using a mixture of chloroform and methanol (97:3) to give the product as a yellow solid (3.81 g, 86%). Melting point: 170− 172 °C. IR (KBr): ν 2925, 2854, 1597, 1499 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.40 (1H, d, J = 8 Hz, −ArH), 7.53 (1H, m, −ArH), 7.28 (1H, d, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.14 (1H, t, J = 7.4 Hz, −ArH), 6.32 (1H, d, J = 2 Hz, −ArH), 6.22 (1H, d, J = 2 Hz, −ArH), 6.00 (1H, m, CH), 5.40 (1H, dd, J = 17.2, 1.2 Hz, CH), 5.29 (1H, dd, J = 10.4, 1.2 Hz, CH), 4.58 (2H, d, J = 5.6 Hz, −CH2), 3.90 (3H, s, −OMe), 3.67 (3H, s, −NMe). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 176.7, 163.2, 163.0, 146.7, 141.7, 132.6, 132.5, 127.6, 124.5, 121.2, 118.4, 114.1, 108.5, 92.6, 91.1, 69.0, 56.2, 34.7. HRMS (QTOF MSES+): found, 296.1276 [M+ + H]; calcd for C18H18NO3, 296.1287. 4.1.3. 4-Allyl-3-hydrooxy-1-methoxy-10-methyl-10H-acridin-9-one (14). A solution of the allyl ether 13 (1.0 g, 3.4 mmol in N,N diethyl aniline (8 mL)) was refluxed for 1 h under nitrogen atmosphere. It was then allowed to come to rt when the precipitated yellow product was filtered, washed with petroleum ether and the crude product was purified by column chromatography over silica gel using a mixture of chloroform− methanol (90:10) to give the product as a yellow solid (0.65 g, 65%). Melting point: 240−242 °C. IR (KBr): ν 3072, 1621, 1594, 1558, 1396 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 10.52 (1H, s, −OH), 8.02 (1H, dd, J = 8, 1.2 Hz, −ArH), 7.88 (1H, m, −ArH), 7.48 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, −ArH), 7.19 (1H, t, J = 7.4 Hz, −ArH), 6.44 (1H, s, −ArH), 6.09 (1H, m, CH), 5.09−5.05 (2H, m, CH), 3.79 (3H, s, −OMe), 3.71 (3H, s, −NMe), 3.48 (2H, d, J = 5.2 Hz, −CH2). 13C NMR (100 MHz, 25 °C, DMSO-d6): δ 175.9, 161.8, 160.0, 149.7, 145.1, 137.4, 132.4, 125.5, 124.4, 121.0, 117.0, 114.8, 109.7, 105.1, 6110

DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b03673 ACS Omega 2019, 4, 6106−6113

ACS Omega

Article

°C. IR (KBr): 2920, 1630, 1604 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.27 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, −ArH), 7.54 (1H, m, −ArH), 7.26 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, −ArH), 7.15 (1H, t, J = 7.6 Hz, −ArH), 6.40 (1H, s, −ArH), 5.93 (1H, m, CH), 5.43 (1H, d, J = 11.2 Hz, CH), 3.79 (3H, s, −OMe), 3.69 (3H, s, −NMe), 3.40 (2H, d, J = 6 Hz, −CH2), 1.38 (6H, s, CMe)2. 13 C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 178.3, 161.5, 160.5, 147.7, 145.2, 137.3, 132.8, 127.2, 125.2, 122.7, 121.6, 117.8, 116.1, 113.1, 101.6, 81.1, 56.4, 44.9, 28.8, 26.4. MS (QTOF ES+): found, 335.1594 [M+ + H]; calcd for C21H22NO3, 336.1599. 4.1.7. 7-Methoxy-4,4,13-trimethyl-3,13-dihydro-4H-5-oxa13-aza-cyclohepta[a]anthracen-8-one (8). To a solution of the oxepine 18 (0.20 g, 0.60 mmol) in the dry toluene (5 mL) catalyst Ru(CO)HCl(PPh3)3 (40 mg, 7 mol %) was added and the reaction mixture was heated at 90 °C for 24 h under argon atmosphere. It was then allowed to come to rt and then concentrated in vacuo to afford a brownish crude which was purified by column chromatography over silica gel using a mixture of ethyl acetate and petroleum ether (40:60) as eluent to give the product as a yellow solid. (0.156 g, 79%). Melting point: 107 °C. IR (KBr): ν 2976, 1629, 1575, 1492 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.31−8.29 (1H, m, −ArH), 7.57−7.53 (1H, m, −ArH), 7.30 (1H, d, J = 8.4, −ArH), 7.19− 7.15 (1H, m, −ArH), 6.35 (1H, d, J = 10.8 Hz, −ArH), 6.31 (1H, s, −ArH), 6.01−5.97 (1H, m, CH), 3.91 (3H, s, −OMe), 3.69 (3H, s, −NMe), 2.44 (2H, d, J = 5.6 Hz, −CH2), 1.42 (6H, s, > C(Me)2). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 177.9, 161.3, 161.0, 148.7, 145.2, 132.7, 128.0, 127.1, 125.6, 124.7, 121.9, 116.3, 112.6, 110.9, 99.9, 88.0, 56.3, 44.8, 41.5, 29.7, 28.0. HRMS (QTOF MSES+): found, 336.1596[M+ + H]; calcd for C21H22NO3, 335.1599. 4.1.8. 1,2-Dihydroxy-7-methoxy-4,4,13-trimethyl-1,3,4,13tetrahydro-2H-5-oxa-13-aza-cyclohepta[a]anthracen-8-one (9). To a solution of the olefin 8 (0.10 g (0.30 mmol) in a mixture of acetone and water (4:1, 1 mL), osmium tetroxide solution (1% in water, 0.1 mL), and N-methylmorpholine-Noxide (85 mg, 0.73 mmol) were sequentially added at room temperature. The reaction mixture was allowed to stir for 18 h before being quenched with aqueous saturated solution of sodium bisulfate (1 mL), and then extracted with dichloromethane (2 × 10 mL). The combined organic layer was washed successively with water (10 mL), brine (10 mL), and then dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. It was filtered and the filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure to leave a crude mass, which was purified by column chromatography over silica gel using a mixture of methanol and chloroform (3:97) to give the product as a pale white solid (0.082g, 74%). Melting point: 180 °C. IR (KBr): ν 3419, 2922, 2852, 1626, 1601 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.21 (1H, d, J = 8 Hz, −ArH), 7.56−7.52 (1H, m, −ArH), 7.25 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, −ArH), 7.19−7.14 (1H, m, −ArH), 6.25 (1H, s, −ArH), 5.06 (1H, d, J = 5.6 Hz, −CH), 3.89 (3H, s, −OMe), 3.79 (3H, s, −NMe), 2.90 (1H, d, J = 8 Hz, −CH), 2.46−2.39 (1H, m, −CH), 2.02−1.97 (1H, m, −CH), 1.54 (6H, s, > C(Me)2. 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 177.9, 162.3, 161.8, 150.2, 145.3, 132.9, 126.8, 125.2, 121.9, 116.6, 114.0, 113.2, 102.1, 80.8, 74.1, 69.0, 56.3, 45.9, 44.1, 32.2, 29.6, 23.6. HRMS (QTOF MSES+): found, 392.1476 (M + Na); calcd for C21H23NaNO5, 392.1474. 4.1.9. 1,2-Diacetoxy-7-methoxy-4,4,13-trimethyl-1,3,4,13tetrahydro-2H-5-oxa-13-aza-cyclohepta[a]anthracen-8-one (10). To a solution of the diol 9 (0.05 g,0.135 mmol) in dry dichloromethane (2 mL) under nitrogen atmosphere,

dimethtylaminopyridine (5 mg, catalytic) and acetic anhydride (0.05 mL) were sequentially added, and the resulting reaction mixture was allowed to stir at room temperature for 18 h. It was then poured into ice-cold water (25 mL) and extracted with dichloromethane (2 × 10 mL). The combined organic layer was washed successively with Fwater (10 mL), brine (10 mL), and then dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. It was filtered and the filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure to leave a crude mass, which was purified by column chromatography over silica gel using a mixture of ethyl acetate and petroleum ether (60:40) to give the product as a colourless solid (0.048 g, 84%). Melting point: 192 °C. IR (KBr): ν 2923, 2852, 1739, 1638, 1602, 1578 cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.33−8.31 (1H, m, −ArH), 7.67−7.63 (1H, m, −ArH), 7.44 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.28−7.24 (1H, m, −ArH), 6.53 (1H, s, −ArH), 6.35 (1H, s, −CH), 5.68−5.64 (1H, m, −CH), 3.98 (3H, s, −OMe), 3.91 (3H, s, −NMe), 2.74 (1H, t, J = 12.8 Hz, −CH), 2.13 (3H, s, −Me), 2.00−1.99 (1H, m, −CH2), 1.97 (3H, s, −Me), 1.64 (6H, s, > C(Me)2), 1.28 (3H, s, −CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 177.9, 170.5, 170.3, 163.4, 163.1, 151.2, 145.1, 133.0, 126.8, 125.5, 122.2, 117.0, 107.5, 100.9, 79.8, 71.6, 69.6, 56.3, 46.9, 40.5, 32.4, 29.7, 23.1, 21.2, 20.9. HRMS (QTOF MSES+): found, 454.1863 [M + H]; calcd for C25H28NO7, 454.1866.



ASSOCIATED CONTENT

S Supporting Information *

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b03673. 1 H NMR and 13C NMR data and spectra of all new compounds; characterization data for compounds leading to acronycine derivatives; and UV, fluorescence, and melting temperature graphs for compounds 1, 5, 6, 8, 9, and 10 (PDF)



AUTHOR INFORMATION

Corresponding Author

*E-mail: [email protected]. ORCID

Shijun Wen: 0000-0002-9347-8243 Shital K. Chattopadhyay: 0000-0001-5972-6891 Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.



ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are thankful to DST, New Delhi, for funds (EMR/2017/ 001336), and University of Kalyani for support under PURSE program, and also for a fellowship to one of us (J.B.).



REFERENCES

(1) (a) Hughes, G. K.; Lahey, F. N.; Price, J. R.; Webb, L. J. Alkaloids of the Australian Rutacae. Nature 1948, 162, 223−224. (b) Macdonald, P.; Robertson, A. The structure of acronycine. Aust. J. Chem. 1966, 19, 275−281. (c) Govindachary, T. R.; Pai, B. R.; Subramaniam, P. S. Alkaloids of glycosmis pentaphylla (Retz.) correa. Tetrahedron 1966, 22, 3245−3254. (2) (a) Svoboda, G. H.; Poore, G. A.; Simpson, P. J.; Boder, G. B. Alkaloids of Acronychia Baueri Schott I. J. Pharm. Sci. 1966, 55, 758− 768. (b) Dorr, R. T.; Liddil, J. D.; Von Hoff, D. D.; Soble, M.; Osborne, C. K. Antitumor Activity and Murine Pharmacokinetics of Parenteral Acronycine. Cancer Res. 1989, 49, 340−344. (c) Tillequin, 6111

DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b03673 ACS Omega 2019, 4, 6106−6113

ACS Omega

Article

F. New antitumor agents in the acronycine series. Ann. Pharm. Fr. 2002, 60, 246−252. (3) Scarffe, J. H.; Beaumont, A. R.; Crowther, D. Phase I-II evaluation of acronycine in patients with multiple myeloma. Cancer Treat. Rep. 1983, 67, 93−94. (4) (a) Dheyongera, J. P.; Geldenhuys, W. J.; Dekker, T. G.; Van der Schyf, C. J. Synthesis, biological evaluation, and molecular modeling of novel thioacridone derivatives related to the anticancer alkaloid acronycine. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005, 13, 689−698. (b) Nguyen, Q.; Nguyen, T.; Yougnia, R.; Gaslonde, T.; Dufat, H.; Michel, S.; Tillequin, F. Acronycine Derivatives: A Promising Series of AntiCancer Agents. Adv. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 2009, 9, 804−815. (d) Michel, S.; Seguin, E.; Tillequin, F. Structure-Activity Relationships in the Acronycine Series. Curr. Med. Chem. 2002, 9, 1689−1700. (5) (a) Elomri, A.; Mitaku, S.; Michel, S.; Skaltsounis, A.-L.; Tillequin, F.; Koch, M.; Pierré, A.; Guilbaud, N.; Léonce, S.; KrausBerthier, L.; Rolland, Y.; Atassi, G. Synthesis and cytotoxic and antitumor activity of esters in the 1,2-dihydroacronycine Series. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 4762−4766. (b) Schneider, J.; Evans, E. L.; Grunberg, E.; Fryer, I. R. Synthesis and biological activity of acronycine analogs. J. Med. Chem. 1972, 15, 266. (c) Magiatis, P.; Mitaku, S.; Skaltsounis, A.-L.; Tillequin, F.; Koch, M.; Pierré, A.; Atassi, G. Synthesis and Biological Activity of Esters in the trans-1,2Dihydroxy-1,2-dihydroacronycine Series. J. Nat. Prod. 1998, 61, 198− 201. (6) Do, Q.; Thi Mai, H. D.; Gaslonde, T.; Pfeiffer, B.; Léonce, S.; Pierré, A.; Michel, S.; Tillequin, F.; Dufat, H. Structure−activity relationships in the acronycine and benzo[b]acronycine series: role of the pyran ring. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 43, 2677−2687. (7) (a) Mai, H. D. T.; Gaslonde, T.; Michel, S.; Tillequin, F.; Koch, M.; Bongui, J.-B.; Elomri, A.; Seguin, E.; Pfeiffer, B.; Renard, P.; David-Cordonnier, M.-H.; Laine, W.; Bailly, C.; Kraus-Berthier, L.; Léonce, S.; Hickman, J. A.; Pierré, A.; Pierre, A. Structure−activity relationships and mechanism of action of antitumor benzo[b]pyrano[3,2-h]acridin-7-one acronycine analogues. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 3072−3082. (b) Kluza, J.; Lansiaux, A.; Wattez, N.; Hildebrand, M.P.; Léonce, S.; Pierré, A.; Hickman, J. A.; Bailly, C. Induction of apoptosis in HL-60 leukemia and B16 melanoma cells by the acronycine derivative S23906-1. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2002, 63, 1443− 1452. (c) Rocca, C. J.; Soares, D. G.; Bouzid, H.; Henriques, J. A. P.; Larsen, A. K.; Escargueil, A. E. BRCA2 is needed for both repair and cell cycle arrest in mammalian cells exposed to S23906, an anticancer monofunctional DNA binder. Cell Cycle 2015, 14, 2080−2090. (d) Tian, W.; Yougnia, R.; Depauw, S.; Lansiaux, A.; DavidCordonnier, M.-H.; Pfeiffer, B.; Kraus-Berthier, L.; Léonce, S.; Pierré, A.; Dufat, H.; Michel, S. Synthesis, Antitumor Activity, and Mechanism of Action of Benzo[b]chromeno[6,5-g][1,8]naphthyridin7-one Analogs of Acronycine. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 10329−10342. (e) Soares, D. G.; Battistella, A.; Rocca, C. J.; Matuo, R.; Henriques, J. A. P.; Larsen, A. K.; Escargueil, A. E. Ataxia telangiectasia mutatedand Rad3-related kinase drives both the early and the late DNAdamage response to the monofunctional antitumour alkylator S23906. Biochem. J. 2011, 437, 63−73. (8) For some reviews on medium ring formation by RCM, see: (a) Chattopadhyay, S. K.; Karmakar, S.; Biswas, T.; Majumdar, K. C.; Rahaman, H.; Roy, B. Formation of medium-ring heterocycles by diene and enyne metathesis. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 3919−3952. (b) Rainier, J. D. Synthesis of natural products containing mediumsize oxygen heterocycles by ring-closing alkene metathesis In Metathesis in Natural Product Synthesis: Strategies, Substrates and Catalysts; Cossy, J., Arseniyadis, S., Meyer, C., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Germany, 2010, pp 87−127. For some reviews on metathesis mediated synthesis of heterocycles, see: (c) Van Otterlo, W. A. L.; de Koning, C. B. Metathesis in the synthesis of aromatic compounds. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 3743−3782. (d) Villar, H.; Frings, M.; Bolm, C. Ring closing enyne metathesis: A powerful tool for the synthesis of heterocycles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 55−66. (e) Deiters, A.; Martin, S. F. Synthesis of Oxygen- and Nitrogen-Containing

Heterocycles by Ring-Closing Metathesis. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 2199−2238. (9) (a) Chattopadhyay, S. K.; Maity, S.; Panja, S. Combined Claisen rearrangement and ring-closing metathesis as a route to oxepin- and oxocin-annulated coumarins. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 7781−7783. (b) Chattopadhyay, S. K.; Pal, B. K.; Maity, S. Combined Multiple Claisen Rearrangement and Ring-closing Metathesis as a Route to Naphthalene, Anthracene, and Anthracycline Ring Systems. Chem. Lett. 2003, 32, 1190−1191. (c) Chattopadhyay, S. K.; Roy, S. P.; Ghosh, D.; Biswas, G. Synthesis of oxepine-, oxocine- and azepineannulated carbazole derivatives by combined Claisen rearrangement and diene/enyne metathesis. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 6895−6898. (d) Chattopadhyay, S.; Biswas, T.; Maity, S. Sequential double Claisen rearrangement and two-directional ring-closing metathesis as a route to various benzofused bisoxepin and bisoxocin derivatives. Synlett 2006, 2211−2214. (e) Chattopadhyay, S.; Neogi, K.; Singha, S.; Dey, R. Sequential Claisen rearrangement and intramolecular Heck reaction as a route to medium-ring oxacycle-fused heterocycles. Synlett 2008, 1137−1140. (f) Ghosh, D.; Thander, L.; Ghosh, S. K.; Chattopadhyay, S. K. Sequential aza-Claisen rearrangement and ringclosing metathesis as a route to 1-benzazepine derivatives. Synlett 2008, 3011−3015. (g) Chattopadhyay, S. K.; Dey, R.; Biswas, S. Regioselective synthesis of oxepin- and oxocin-Annulated 2quinolones. Synthesis 2005, 403−406. (h) Chattopadhyay, S. K.; Biswas, T.; Neogi, K. Synthesis of polycyclic coumarin derivatives by combined Claisen rearrangement, ring-closing metathesis, and Diels− Alder Reaction. Chem. Lett. 2006, 35, 376−377. (i) Chattopadhyay, S.; Ghosh, D.; Mondal, P.; Ghosh, S. A new route to pyrano[3,2a]carbazole ring Systems and annulated derivatives thereof. Synthesis 2012, 44, 2448−2454. (j) Chattopadhyay, S.; Mondal, P.; Ghosh, D. A new route to pyranocoumarins and their benzannulated derivatives. Synthesis 2014, 46, 3331−3340. (10) (a) Piedra, E.; Francos, J.; Nebra, N.; Suárez, F. J.; Díez, J.; Cadierno, V. Access to unusual polycyclic spiro-enones from 2,2′bis(allyloxy)-1,1′-binaphthyls using Grubbs’ catalysts: an unprecedented one-pot RCM/Claisen sequence. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 7866−7868. (b) Song, L.; Huang, F.; Guo, L.; Ouyang, M.-A.; Tong, R. A cascade Claisen rearrangement/o-quinone methide formation/ electrocyclization approach to 2H-chromenes. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 6021−6024. (c) Rotzoll, S.; Gorls, H.; Langer, P. Regioselective synthesis of oxepin- and oxocin-annulated quinolines by combined ‘Claisen-rearrangement/olefin-metathesis’ reactions. Synthesis 2008, 45−52. (d) Chang, M.-Y.; Chen, Y.-C.; Chan, C.-K. Synthesis of vinylcyclopropanes by allylation/ring-closing metathesis/Claisen rearrangement. Tetrahedron 2014, 70, 8908−8913. (e) Litinas, K. E.; Mangos, A.; Nikkou, T. E.; Hadjipavlou-Litina, D. J. Synthesis and biological evaluation of fused oxepinocoumarins as free radicals scavengers. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2011, 26, 805−812. (f) Pain, C.; Célanire, S.; Guillaumet, G.; Joseph, B. Synthesis of quinolonefused multi-ring-sized heterocycles via combined Claisen Rearrangement/ring-closing metathesis reactions. Synlett 2003, 2089−2091. (g) Kotha, S.; Mandal, K.; Deb, A. C.; Banerjee, S. Microwave-assisted Claisen rearrangement on a silica gel support. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 9603−9605. (h) Majumdar, K.; Maji, P.; Rahaman, H.; Roy, B. Synthesis of Oxepin- and Oxocin- Annulated Pyrimidine Derivatives by Claisen Rearrangement and Ring Closing Metathesis/Ring Closing Enyne Metathesis (SUPORTING DATA). Lett. Org. Chem. 2006, 3, 845−847. (11) For some reviews, see: (a) Jacques, R.; Pal, R.; Parker, N. A.; Sear, C. E.; Smith, P. W.; Ribaucourt, A.; Hodgson, D. M. Recent applications in natural product synthesis of dihydrofuran and -pyran formation by ring-closing alkene metathesis. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016, 14, 5875−5893. (b) Nasir, N. M.; Ermanis, K. Strategies for the construction of tetrahydropyran rings in the synthesis of natural products. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014, 12, 3323. (12) (a) Kishuku, H.; Shindo, M.; Shishido, K. Enantioselective total synthesis of (-)-heliannuol A. Chem. Commun. 2003, 350−351. (b) Stefinovic, M.; Snieckus, V. Connecting Directed Ortho Metalation and Olefin Metathesis Strategies. Benzene-Fused Multir6112

DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b03673 ACS Omega 2019, 4, 6106−6113

ACS Omega

Article

ing-Sized Oxygen Heterocycles. First Syntheses of Radulanin A and Helianane. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 2808−2809. (c) Hanessian, S.; Auzzas, L. Alternative and Expedient Asymmetric Syntheses of L(+)-Noviose. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 261−264. (d) Chang, S.; Grubbs, R. H. A Highly Efficient and Practical Synthesis of Chromene Derivatives Using Ring-Closing Olefin Metathesis. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 864−866. (13) (a) Hlubucek, J.; Ritchie, E.; Taylor, W. A synthesis of acronycine. Aust. J. Chem. 1970, 23, 1881−1889. (b) Blechert, S.; Fichter, K.-E.; Winterfeldt, E. Eine flexible und regioselektive Acronycin Synthese. Chem. Ber. 1978, 111, 439−450. (c) Adams, J. H.; Margaret Brown, P.; late Padma Gupta, t.; Shafig Khan, M.; Lewis, J. R. Rutaceous constituents-13. Tetrahedron 1981, 37, 209−217. (d) Bahar, M. H.; Sabata, B. K. A two-step synthesis of 1-hydroxy-3methoxy-10-methylacridone an acridone alkaloid. Ind. J. Chem. 1987, 26B, 782. (e) Loughhead, D. G. Synthesis of des-N-methylacronycine and Acronycine. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 2245−2246. (f) Anand, R. C.; Selvapalam, N. A practical regiospecific approach towards acronycine and related alkaloids. Chem. Commun. 1996, 199−200. (g) Hari, G. S.; Lee, Y.-R.; Wang, X.; Lyoo, W.-S.; Kim, S.-H. New synthetic routes to acronycine, noracronycine, and their analogues. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2010, 31, 2406−2409. (14) Dorr, R. T.; Liddil, J. D. Development of a parenteral formulation for the anti-tumour agent acronycine. J. Drug Dev. 1988, 1, 31−39. (15) (a) David-Cordonnier, M.-H.; Laine, W.; Lansiaux, A.; Kouach, M.; Briand, G.; Pierré, A.; Hickman, J. A.; Bailly, C. Alkylation of Guanine in DNA by S23906-1, a Novel Potent Antitumor Compound Derived from the Plant Alkaloid Acronycine. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 9911−9920. (b) Do, Q.; Tian, W.; Yougnia, R.; Gaslonde, T.; Pfeiffer, B.; Pierré, A.; Léonce, S.; Kraus-Berthier, L.; David-Cordonnier, M.H.; Depauw, S.; Lansiaux, A.; Mazinghien, R.; Koch, M.; Tillequin, F.; Michel, S. Synthesis, cytotoxic activity, and DNA binding properties of antitumor cis-1,2-dihydroxy-1,2-dihydrobenzo[b]acronycine cinnamoyl esters. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 1918−1927. (16) For our earlier work, see: (a) Dufat, S. K.; Maitra, R.; Kundu, I.; Jana, M.; Mandal, S. K.; Khuda-Bukhsh, A. R. Acridone−Pterocarpan conjugate: a hybrid molecular probe for recognition of nucleic acids. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 2013, 8145−8153. (b) Chattopadhyay, S. K.; Kundu, I.; Maitra, R. The coumarin−pterocarpan conjugate − a natural product inspired hybrid molecular probe for DNA recognition. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014, 12, 8087−8093. (17) Sahoo, D.; Bhattacharya, P.; Chakravorti, S. Quest for Mode of Binding of 2-(4-(Dimethylamino)styryl)-1-methylpyridinium Iodide with Calf Thymus DNA. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 2044−2050.

6113

DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b03673 ACS Omega 2019, 4, 6106−6113