Subscriber access provided by UNIV AUTONOMA DE COAHUILA UADEC
Note
Synthetic Access to Secondary Propargylamines via CopperCatalyzed Oxidative Deamination-Alkynylation Cascade Huiqiong Li, Huangdi Feng, Jingxian Zhang, Erik V. Van der Eycken, and Liliang Huang J. Org. Chem., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.9b01431 • Publication Date (Web): 26 Jul 2019 Downloaded from pubs.acs.org on July 27, 2019
Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. ACS cannot be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts.
is published by the American Chemical Society. 1155 Sixteenth Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036 Published by American Chemical Society. Copyright © American Chemical Society. However, no copyright claim is made to original U.S. Government works, or works produced by employees of any Commonwealth realm Crown government in the course of their duties.
Page 1 of 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
The Journal of Organic Chemistry
Synthetic Access to Secondary Propargylamines via Copper-Catalyzed Oxidative Deamination-Alkynylation Cascade Huiqiong Li,† Huangdi Feng,*† Jingxian Zhang † Erik V. Van der Eycken‡,§ and Liliang Huang† †College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, 333 Longteng Road, Shanghai, 201620, China ‡Laboratory for Organic and Microwave-Assisted Chemistry (LOMAC), Department of Chemistry, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200F, Leuven 3001, Belgium §Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 6 Miklukho-Maklaya Street, Moscow 117198, Russia. *E-mail:
[email protected];
Graphical Abstract H 2N H 2N
+
R1 Homo Deamination R1
(i)
(ii)
TBHP R3
NH
R3
Cross Deamination R1
Cu
R1
R1
25 examples
R2
NH
R2
+
NH2 NH2
R3
R1 9 examples
Abstract A novel and selective cascade reaction of primary amines and alkynes for the synthesis of the corresponding secondary propargylamines is described. This protocol proceeds with a CuBr2/TBHP system through a process of oxidative deamination of primary amines to imine and alkynylation, featuring a wide scope of substrates with good functional-group tolerance and operational-simplicity. Additionally, the use of two different primary amines could also work smoothly using this protocol.
Introduction Propargylamines are robust substrates widely valued for the generation of diverse heterocycles in organic synthesis.1 A number of these compounds also exhibit intrinsic biological activities in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases.2 Owing to their apparent importance, significant efforts have been done for the synthesis of propargylamines. In particular, the transition metal-catalyzed three-component coupling of an amine, an aldehyde, and a terminal alkyne, known as the A3coupling, is now broadly employed for the synthesis of propargylamines (Scheme 1, eq 1).3 Also, a decarboxylative A3-coupling process has been developed as an alternative approach for accessing 1
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
The Journal of Organic Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
propargylamines.4
In
addition,
transition
metal-catalyzed
Page 2 of 19
tandem
hydroamination
of
alkynes/alkynylation has been firmly established by Li, Hammond, Dyson, Blecherta, Larsen and others, leading to the construction of functionalized propargylamines (Scheme 1, eq 2).5 At the same time, tertiary amines have emerged as direct precursors that can undergo oxidative crossdehydrogenative coupling (CDC) with alkynes to produce a series of tertiary propargylamines (Scheme 1, eq 3).6,7 However, the lower reactivity of primary amines mostly makes the reported strategies not ideally suitable for the yielding of secondary propargylamines which have revealed a broader range of transformations than tertiary propargylamines.8 Therefore, the exploration of a new and efficient protocol for the synthesis of secondary propargylamines is still highly desirable. R R
R
2 NH
+
O R
R1 2 NH
R R
1
transition metal
R4
+
3
R +
R
R3
1
R3
R NH2 R
NH2
R3
R4
(1) R3 R1 N R2
or R3
Cu, Fe, Zn
R4
+
R1 N R2
3
Cu, Zn, etc
2N
R1
3
R1 N R2
R3 Me R1 N R2
R4
oxidants
(3) R3
R1 R
+
3
Cu, oxidant
R1
N
or Homo-
NH2 R
R1
NH
R3
R
1
R3
(2)
NH
R3 Cross-
R
(4)
(this work)
Scheme 1. Representative routes to propargylamines: (1) Transition metal-catalyzed A3-coupling, (2) Cross-dehydrogenative coupling, (3) Tandem hydroamination/alkynylation; (4) Present work: deamination/alkynylation cascade. It has been well established that oxidative deamination of amines can be performed to form imines in the presence of metal catalysts.9 For example, the copper/oxidant dual system was successfully applied for the reaction of a primary amine.10 In pursuit of expanding our knowledge about A3coupling reactions,11 we speculated that the imines resulting from direct oxidation of primary amines, could be trapped by alkynes in the presence of a copper catalyst (Scheme 1, eq 4). To the best of our knowledge this is the first report of an efficient synthesis of secondary propargylamines from primary amines and alkynes, through a catalytic oxidative deamination/alkynylation cascade process. This strategy poses significant challenges, not just because of the propensity of overoxidation of the imine to the nitrile,12 but also because of the rapid homocoupling of alkynes under
2
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 3 of 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
The Journal of Organic Chemistry
oxidative conditions13 Moreover, another impediment is the competing over-oxidation of the final propargylamines.
Results and Discussion An optimization campaign ascertained suitable reaction conditions opting for a model reaction of benzylamine 1a and phenylacetylene 2a in the presence of CuBr2. Employing 12.5 mol% Cu with 1.25 equiv tert-butyl hydroperoxide (70% TBHP) in toluene, a 70% yield of propargylamine 3a was obtained after 3 h at 100 °C (Table 1, entry 1). The importance of water for the yield was pronounced when TBHP-decane was introduced instead of aqueous 70% TBHP (entry 2). Using H2O2, no desired product was observed (entry 3). Different copper catalysts such as CuCl2, Cu(OTf)2, CuI and CuBr as well as various catalyst loadings showed lower catalytic efficacy, giving 3a in 18−58% yields (entries 4−9). Switching the solvent to DCE, CH3CN or omitting it, resulted in lower yields (entries 10−12). Further, tuning the reaction parameters such as ratio of substrates, temperature and time had a positive effect on the yield (entries 13−16). A 79% yield of product was observed when 2.5 equiv of phenylacetylene 2a was applied at 110 oC for 4 h (entry 16). Table 1. Oxidative Deaminative Reaction with Alkynes NH2
+
1a (0.8 mmol)
Ph
12.5 mol% CuBr2 70% TBHP (12.5 equiv)
HN
toluene (1 mL), 100 oC, 3 h 2a (0.8 mmol)
3a
standard conditions
entry
deviation from the “standard conditions”
yielda (%)
1
none
70
2
TBHP-decane instead of 70% TBHP
53
3
H2O2 instead of 70% TBHP
NDb
4
CuCl2 instead of CuBr2
46
5
Cu(OTf)2 instead of CuBr2
18
6
CuI instead of CuBr2
51
7
CuBr instead of CuBr2
58
8
8 mol% of CuBr2
56
9
20 mol% of CuBr2
39
10
DCE instead of toluene
55
11
CH3CN instead of toluene
28
12
omit toluene
64
13
1a (1.0 mmol)
69
14
2a (1.0 mmol)
74
15
2a (1.0 mmol), reaction time prolonged to 4 h
76
16
2a (1.0 mmol), temperature increased to 110 °C, 4 h
79
aIsolated
yields.
bND
= not detected
3
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
The Journal of Organic Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 4 of 19
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, a series of propargylamines 3 were generated from their corresponding amines and alkynes (Table 2). Firstly, a range of benzylamines was examined demonstrating that both electron-donating and electron-withdrawing substrates could react with 2a smoothly to deliver the corresponding products (3a−3e, 3g−3j) in good to excellent yields. Surprisingly, meta-substituted benzylamines provided lower yields (3c and 3e) than ortho-and parasubstituted ones (3b and 3d) together with the corresponding aldehydes as byproducts (monitored by GC-MS). However, when the 3,4-dimethoxybenzylamine was used, no desired product (3f) was obtained. Remarkably, for aliphatic primary amines involving cyclohexylmethanamine, n-butylamine and phenethylamine, only cyclohexylmethanamine could be successfully converted into the desired product (3k). This might be owing to the fact that most aliphatic amines are more difficult converted into the corresponding imine as compared to benzylamine employing the standard conditions.14 It is also worth noting that a secondary amine tolerates the reaction conditions, giving the tertiary propargylamine 3n. The result suggests that the final secondary propargylamine is potential to further transformation. Furthermore, the scope of alkynes was evaluated using benzylamine 1a. To our delight, all the target products (3aa−3an) were obtained with very good yields when reacted with different phenylacetylenes. However, it turned out that the reaction efficiency was susceptible to electronic effects. In general, phenylacetylenes containing electron-donating groups including methyl, methoxy, ethyl, butyl, amyl and t-butyl afforded higher yields (3aa−3ag) than those with electron-withdrawing groups, including Cl, F, CF3 (3ah−3an). No product (3ao) was obtained with ethynylcyclopropane. Table 2. Applicable Amines and Alkynes to Homo-Deaminative Couplinga. R1
R2
+
NH2
CuBr2(12.5 mol%),TBHP(1.25 equiv) toluene,110 oC, 4 h
2
1
R1 HN
R2
R1
3
Amines OMe
HN
HN
HN
HN
HN
MeO
3a, 79% yield
3b, 87% yield
OMe
3c, 63% yield
Cl
3d, 81% yield
Cl
HN
F
Br
HN
OMe
3e, 57% yield HN
HN
HN Cl
MeO MeO
Br
Cl
4
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
F
Page 5 of 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
The Journal of Organic Chemistry
3f, 0% yield
3g, 59% yield
HN
3h, 70% yield
3i, 61% yield
3j, 72% yield
N
HN HN
3k, 57% yield
3l, 0% yield
3m, 0% yield
3n, 66% yield
Alkynes HN
HN
HN
HN OMe
3aa, 88% yield
3ab, 82% yield
3ac, 90% yield
HN
HN
3ae, 87% yield HN
3ad, 79% yield
HN
HN
tBu
nBu
Et
Cl
nAm
3af, 86% yield
3ag, 86% yield
HN
3ah, 73% yield
HN
HN F
F
F3C
F
3ai, 73% yield HN
3aj, 78%yield
3ak, 71% yield
HN
3al, 51% yield
HN CF3
CF3
3am, 84% yield
3an, 67% yield
3ao, 0% yield
aReaction
scale: 0.8 mmol of amine 1, 1.0 mmol of alkyne 2, 12.5 mmol% of CuBr2, 1.25 equiv of 70% TBHP, 1 mL toluene. Reported yields are isolated yields. It is well-known that the cross-deamination of two different amines is more difficult. In order to further demonstrate the synthetic practicality of our protocol, a three-component tandem reaction of a benzylamine, an amine and a phenylacetylene was tested under slightly improved conditions. The initial study started using benzylamine 1a and n-butylamine under the standard conditions, but only
39% yield of the corresponding products 4a was isolated. An increased yield to 48% was obtained when 2.0 equiv. TBHP was introduced. (Table 3). Subsequently, different amines 1’ were evaluated, and moderate yields of the desired products (4b−4e) were obtained, because the homo-deamination of benzylamine 1a could not be fully avoided, giving 3a as a main isolated byproduct. Notably, when two different benzylamines were employed in the reaction, the desired product 4b was isolated
5
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
The Journal of Organic Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 6 of 19
in 56% yield. Furthermore, various benzylamines 1 and phenylacetylenes 2 with common functional groups could also be applied, resulting in the formation of the corresponding propargylamines (4f−4i) in moderate yields. Table 3. Applicable Amines and Alkynes to Cross-Deaminative Couplinga. NH2
R1
CuBr2(15 mol%), TBHP(2.0 equiv)
3
+
1
R2
R + NH 1'
2
toluene,110 oC, 4 h
R4
OMe
HN
4a, 48% yield HN
R1
O
N
N
HN
4b, 50% yield
4c, 49% yield
HN
R4
4
OMe
OMe
HN
R3 R2 N
4d, 30% yield
HN
4e, 39% yield HN OMe
CF3
F
4f, 41% yield
4g, 40% yield
4h, 46% yield
aReaction
scale: 0.5 mmol of benzylamine 1, 0.3 mmol of amine 2, 1 mL toluene. Reported yields are isolated yields.
1’,
4i, 43% yield
1.0 mmol of phenylacetylenes
A plausible mechanism is depicted in Scheme 2. Key intermediate methanimine A2 is generated with the regeneration of the copper catalyst via CuBr2/TBHP initiated dehydrogenative oxidation of primary amine 1 through the intermediate A1.15 Subsequently, the imine A3 could be produced through two pathways:8 1) partial hydrolysis of intermediate A2 resulting in the corresponding aldehyde, followed by a condensation reaction with another molecule of amine 1 or 1’, 2) direct deaminative reaction of A2 with another molecule of amine 1 or 1’. Meanwhile, the copper acetylide B2 is in situ formed from an alkyne 2 and a copper catalyst through the intermediate B1, followed by the reaction with the imine intermediate A3, leading to the desired homo-deamination product 3 or cross-deamination product 4.
6
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 7 of 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
The Journal of Organic Chemistry
CuII B1
R1 1
R3
NH2
CuII B2
CuII R1 A1
TBHP
R3 R3
HN
2
CuII
R
R1
R2
HN
3
3 or 4 R
1
R
2
N
A3
NH
A2
NH2 2 R1 R 1'
Scheme 2. Mechanistic Hypothesis.
Conclusion In summary, we have developed a novel protocol to generate a diverse array of secondary propargyl amines starting from two amines and an alkyne. The reaction proceeds via a copper-catalyzed aerobic deamination/alkynylation cascade, in which the [Cu]-acetylide is postulated to capture the imine intermediate. This homo- or cross-deaminative coupling reaction complements disconnections in traditional synthetic routes to secondary propargyl amines.
Experimental Sections General information. Unless otherwise noted, all commercial reagents were used directly as purchased. All work-up and purification procedures were carried out with reagent-grade solvents that had not been pre-dried under ambient atmosphere. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed and visualization of the compounds was accomplished with UV light (254 nm) or iodine. Flash column chromatography was performed on silica gel (200–300 mesh). All 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance III instrument (400 MHz and 100 MHz, respectively). Chemical shifts (δ) are reported in ppm relative to the tetramethylsilane (TMS) signal or residual protio solvent signal. Data for 1H NMR are recorded as follows: chemical shift (δ, ppm), multiplicity (s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, m = multiplet or unresolved, coupling constant (s) in Hz, integration). Data for
13C
NMR is reported in terms of chemical shift (δ, ppm). High
resolution mass spectra were obtained on a Waters GC-TOFMS mass spectrometer with an electron impact ionization (EI) probe. General Procedure for the synthesis of secondary propargylamines 3. Amines 1 (0.8 mmol), CuBr2 (11.16 mg, 12.5 mol%), 70% TBHP (64 mg, 0.5 mmol) and toluene (1 mL) were charged
7
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
The Journal of Organic Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
into a 10 mL tube along with a magnetic stir bar. The mixture was stirred in oil bath at 110 oC for 4-5 min, then alkynes 2 (1.0 mmol) were added into the reaction system, and the resulting mixture was stirred at 110 oC for another 4 h until amines 1 were completely consumed, monitoring with TLC. Subsequently, the mixture was cooled to room temperature), and purified by running column chromatography on silica gel using petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (v/v, 30:1) as eluent to afford the desired products 3. General Procedure for the synthesis of secondary propargylamines 4. Benzylamine 1 (0.5 mmol), another amines (0.3 mmol), CuBr2 (10 mg, 15 mol%), 70% TBHP (77 mg, 0.6 mmol) and toluene (1 mL) were charged into a 10 mL tube along with a magnetic stir bar. The mixture was stirred in oil bath at 110 ℃ for 4-5 min, phenylacetylenes 2 (1.0 mmol) was then added into the reaction system. After that, the reaction was performed again and refluxed at 110 oC for 4 h. Subsequently, the mixture was cooled to room temperature, and purified by running column chromatography on silica gel using petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (v/v, 30:1-20:1) as eluent to afford the desired products 4. N-benzyl-1, 3-diphenylprop-2-yn-1-amine (3a)16. yellow oil; 94.1 mg; 79% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.62–7.60 (m, 2H), 7.50–7.47 (m, 2H), 7.44–7.27 (m, 10H), 7.27–7.21 (m, 1H), 4.80 (s, 1H), 4.09–3.86 (m, 2H), 1.77 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 140.4, 139.9, 131.8, 128.6, 128.5, 128.3, 128.2, 127.8, 127.7, 127.1, 123.2, 89.3, 85.8, 77.4, 53.7, 51.2. N-(2-methylbenzyl)-3-phenyl-1-(o-tolyl)prop-2-yn-1-amine (3b). yellow oil; 113.2 mg; 87% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.82–7.67 (m, 1H), 7.57–7.43 (m, 2H), 7.41–7.26 (m, 4H), 7.24–7.18 (m, 2H), 7.18–7.15 (m, 4H), 4.93 (s, 1H), 4.07 (d, J = 12.6 Hz, 1H), 3.94 (d, J = 12.6 Hz, 1H), 2.38 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H), 1.53 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 138.3, 137.8, 137.0, 136.4, 131.8, 130.7, 130.4, 129.3, 128.4, 128.2, 127.8, 127.5, 127.3, 126.1, 125.9, 123.4, 89.6, 85.7, 51.5, 49.5, 19.0, 18.9. HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C24H23N [M]+ 325.1830, found 325.1828. N-(3-methylbenzyl)-3-phenyl-1-(m-tolyl)prop-2-yn-1-amine (3c). milk white oil; 82.0 mg; 63% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.57–7.55 (m, 2H), 7.46 (s, 2H), 7.40–7.35 (m, 3H), 7.34–7.25 (m, 4H), 7.18–7.12 (m, 2H), 4.85 (s, 1H), 4.10–3.93 (m, 2H), 3.04 (s, 1H), 2.41 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 6H). 13C{1H}
NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 139.6, 138.9, 138.3, 138.1, 131.8, 129.4, 128.8, 128.5, 128.5,
128.4, 128.3, 128.3, 128.1, 125.7, 124.9, 123.2, 88.8, 86.1, 53.7, 51.0, 21.5, 21.4. HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C24H23N [M]+ 325.1830, found 325.1829. 8
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 8 of 19
Page 9 of 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
The Journal of Organic Chemistry
N-(4-methylbenzyl)-3-phenyl-1-(p-tolyl)prop-2-yn-1-amine (3d). milk white oil; 105.0 mg; 81% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.59–7.51 (m, 4H), 7.40–7.35 (m, 5H), 7.26–7.21 (m, 4H), 4.83 (s, 1H), 4.06–3.97 (m, 2H), 2.42 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 6H), 1.95 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 137.5, 137.4, 136.8, 136.6, 131.8, 129.2, 129.1, 128.4, 128.3, 128.1, 127.6, 123.3, 89.6, 85.5, 53.3, 50.8, 21.1, 21.1. HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C24H23N [M]+ 325.1830, found 325.1830. N-(3-methoxybenzyl)-1-(3-methoxyphenyl)-3-phenylprop-2-yn-1-amine (3e). milk white oil; 81.4 mg; 57% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.58–7.52 (m, 2H), 7.41–7.29 (m, 5H), 7.29– 7.24 (m, 2H), 7.09–7.02 (m, 2H), 6.94–6.84 (m, 2H), 4.86 (s, 1H), 4.08–4.00 (m, 2H), 3.88 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 6H), 2.15 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.8, 141.8, 141.3, 131.8, 129.5, 129.4, 128.3, 128.2, 123.1, 120.8, 120.1, 113.9, 113.4, 112.7, 89.1, 85.8, 55.3, 55.2, 53.6, 51.1. HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C24H23NO2 [M]+ 357.1729, found 357.1728. N-(2-chlorobenzyl)-1-(2-chlorophenyl)-3-phenylprop-2-yn-1-amine (3g). yellow oil; 86.6 mg; 59% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.86–7.83 (m, 1H), 7.50–7.47 (m, 3H), 7.38–7.30 (m, 6H), 7.25–7.18 (m, 3H), 5.22 (s, 1H), 4.14 (d, J = 13.5 Hz, 1H), 4.05 (d, J = 13.5 Hz, 1H), 2.04 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 137.6, 137.0, 134.1, 133.4, 131.8, 131.8, 130.7, 129.8, 129.5, 129.2, 128.6, 128.3, 127.7, 127.2, 126.9, 123.0, 88.2, 85.7, 51.3, 49.2. HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C22H17Cl2N [M]+ 365.0738, found 365.0730. N-(4-chlorobenzyl)-1-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-phenylprop-2-yn-1-amine (3h). yellow soild; 102.3 mg; 70% yield; MP: 64.1–67.2 oC. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.54 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.49– 7.46 (m, 2H), 7.35–7.30 (m, 7H), 7.30–7.26 (m, 2H), 4.73 (s, 1H), 3.93 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 2H), 1.74 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 138.8, 138.2, 133.6, 132.9, 131.8, 129.8, 129.1, 128.7, 128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 122.9, 88.5, 86.3, 53.0, 50.4. HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C22H17Cl2N [M]+ 365.0738, found 365.0726. N-(4-bromobenzyl)-1-(4-bromophenyl)-3-phenylprop-2-yn-1-amine (3i). white soild; 110.4 mg; 61% yield; MP: 86.8–87.6 oC. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.58–7.39 (m, 8H), 7.35–7.32 (m, 3H), 7.29–7.22 (m, 2H), 4.72 (s, 1H), 3.92 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 2H), 1.78 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 139.2, 138.6, 131.8, 131.6, 131.6, 130.2, 129.4, 128.5, 128.4, 122.8, 121.8, 121.0, 88.3, 86.4, 53.0, 50.4. HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C22H17Br2N [M]+ 452.9728, found 452.9729. N-(4-fluorobenzyl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-3-phenylprop-2-yn-1-amine (3j). colorless oil; 96.0 mg; 72% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.60–7.55 (m, 2H), 7.54–7.44 (m, 2H), 7.39–7.30 (m, 9
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
The Journal of Organic Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
5H), 7.09–6.98 (m, 4H), 4.75 (s, 1H), 4.02–3.87 (m, 2H), 1.77 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 163.6, 163.3, 161.0 (d, J C, F = 30.9 HZ), 136.1 (d, J C, F = 2.5 HZ), 135.5 (d, J C, F = 2.7 HZ), 131.8, 130.0 (d, J C, F = 7.8 HZ), 129.3 (d, J C, F =8.1 HZ), 128.4, 123.0, 115.4 (d, J C, F = 5.7 HZ), 115.2 (d, J
C, F
= 5.5 HZ), 88.8, 86.1, 52.9, 50.4. HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C22H17F2N [M]+
333.1329, found 333.1327. 1-cyclohexyl-N-(cyclohexylmethyl)-3-phenylprop-2-yn-1-amine (3k). yellow oil; 70.2 mg; 57% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.44–7.41 (m, 2H), 7.32–7.27 (m, 3H), 3.36 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 1H), 2.75–2.70 (m, 1H), 2.51–2.46 (m, 1H), 1.78–1.56 (m, 8H), 1.55–1.39 (m, 3H), 1.33–1.15 (m, 10H), 0.99–0.88 (m, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 131.9, 128.8, 128.4, 122.0, 56.4, 52.7, 40.3, 35.1, 31.2, 30.4, 30.1, 27.9, 26.1, 26.0, 25.8, 25.6, 25.5. HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C22H31N [M]+ 309.2457, found 309.2450. N-benzyl-N-methyl-1, 3-diphenylprop-2-yn-1-amine (3n)17. yellow oil; 82.1 mg; 66% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.68 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.58–7.56 (m, 2H), 7.42 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.39–7.22 (m, 9H), 4.92 (s, 1H), 3.73 (d, J = 13.1 Hz, 1H), 3.64 (d, J = 13.1 Hz, 1H), 2.24 (s, 3H). 13C{1H}
NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 139.4, 139.1, 132.0, 129.1, 128.4, 128.4, 128.3, 128.2, 127.6,
127.2, 123.4, 88.8, 84.8, 77.4, 59.7, 59.0, 38.1. N-benzyl-1-phenyl-3-(m-tolyl)prop-2-yn-1-amine (3aa)18. colorless oil; 109.5 mg; 88% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.60 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.40 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.37–7.26 (m, 7H), 7.26–7.21 (m, 1H), 7.20–7.14 (m, 1H), 7.10 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 4.78 (s, 1H), 4.04–3.89 (m, 2H), 2.31 (s, 3H), 1.79 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 140.6, 140.0, 138.1, 132.5, 129.2, 129.0, 128.6, 128.6, 128.6, 128.3, 127.9, 127.8, 127.2, 123.1,89.1, 86.5, 53.8, 51.3, 21.3. N-benzyl-1-phenyl-3-(p-tolyl)prop-2-yn-1-amine (3ab). colorless oil; 102.5 mg; 82% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.60 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.43–7.37 (m, 3H), 7.37–7.19 (m, 7H), 7.10 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 4.78 (s, 1H), 4.03–3.92 (m, 2H), 2.32 (s, 3H), 1.77 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 140.6, 140.0, 138.3, 131.7, 129.1, 128.6, 128.5, 127.8, 127.1, 120.2, 88.6, 85.9, , 53.8, 51.2, 21.5. HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C23H21N [M]+ 311.1674, found 311.1673. N-benzyl-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1-phenylprop-2-yn-1-amine (3ac)18. colorless oil; 117.8 mg; 90% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.60 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.43–7.37 (m, 4H), 7.36–7.21 (m, 6H), 6.86–6.78 (m, 2H), 4.78 (s, 1H), 4.03–3.91 (m, 2H), 3.76 (s, 3H), 2.21 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.6, 140.6, 139.9, 133.2, 128.6, 128.5, 128.5, 127.8, 127.7, 127.1, 115.4, 10
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 10 of 19
Page 11 of 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
The Journal of Organic Chemistry
114.0, 87.8, 85.7, 55.3, 53.8, 51.2. N-benzyl-3-(4-ethylphenyl)-1-phenylprop-2-yn-1-amine (3ad). yellow oil; 102.8 mg; 79% yield. 1H
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.60 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.44–7.19 (m, 10H), 7.13 (d, J = 8.1 Hz,
2H), 4.78 (s, 1H), 4.05–3.89 (m, 2H), 2.64–2.59 (m, 2H), 1.80 (s, 1H), 1.23–1.19 (m, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 144.7, 140.6, 140.0, 131.9, 128.6, 128.6, 128.6, 128.0, 127.8, 127.2, 120.5, 88.7, 86.1, 53.8, 51.3, 29.0, 15.6. HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C24H23N [M]+ 325.1830, found 325.1829. N-benzyl-3-(4-butylphenyl)-1-phenylprop-2-yn-1-amine (3ae). yellow oil; 122.9 mg; 87% yield. 1H
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.60 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.41–7.38 (m, 4H), 7.37–7.19 (m, 6H), 7.11
(d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 4.78 (s, 1H), 4.08–3.89 (m, 2H), 2.57 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 1.77 (s, 1H), 1.64– 1.48 (m, 2H), 1.37–1.28 (m, 2H), 0.91 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 143.4, 140.7, 140.1, 131.8, 128.6, 128.6, 128.6, 128.5, 127.8, 127.2, 120.5, 88.7, 86.1, 53.8, 51.3, 35.7, 33.5, 22.4, 14.1. HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C26H27N [M]+ 353.2143, found 353.2143. N-benzyl-3-(4-(tert-butyl)phenyl)-1-phenylprop-2-yn-1-amine (3af). yellow oil; 121.5 mg; 86% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.61 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.44 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.39 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.37–7.18 (m, 8H), 4.79 (s, 1H), 4.07–3.91 (m, 2H), 1.77 (s, 1H), 1.30 (s, 9H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 151.5, 140.6, 140.1, 131.6, 128.6, 128.5, 127.8, 127.2, 125.4, 120.3, 88.7, 86.0, 53.8, 51.3, 34.8, 31.3. HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C26H27N [M]+ 353.2143, found 353.2145. N-benzyl-3-(4-pentylphenyl)-1-phenylprop-2-yn-1-amine (3ag). yellow oil; 125.8 mg; 86% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.60 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.41–7.38 (m, 4H), 7.36–7.21 (m, 6H), 7.12 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 4.78 (s, 1H), 4.08–3.89 (m, 2H), 2.68–2.47 (m, 2H), 1.77 (s, 1H), 1.68–1.47 (m, 2H), 1.36–1.21 (m, 4H), 0.88 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 143.4, 140.6, 140.0, 131.8, 128.6, 128.6, 128.5, 127.8, 127.2, 120.5, 88.7, 86.1, 53.8, 51.3, 36.0, 31.5, 31.1, 22.7, 14.2. HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C27H29N [M]+ 367.2300, found 367.2303. N-benzyl-3-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-phenylprop-2-yn-1-amine (3ah). colorless oil; 97.1 mg; 73% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.58 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.42–7.21 (m, 12H), 4.78 (s, 1H), 4.03–3.88 (m, 2H), 1.84 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 140.2, 139.8, 134.3, 133.1, 128.7, 128.7, 128.6, 128.5, 128.0, 127.7, 127.2, 121.7, 90.4, 84.7, 53.7, 51.3. HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C22H18ClN [M]+ 331.1128, found 331.1124. N-benzyl-3-(2-fluorophenyl)-1-phenylprop-2-yn-1-amine (3ai). Colorless oil; 92.5 mg; 73% 11
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
The Journal of Organic Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 12 of 19
yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.63 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.50–7.24 (m, 10H), 7.11–7.06 (m, 2H), 4.83 (s, 1H), 4.08–3.95 (m, 2H), 1.80 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 164.3, 161.8, 139.8 (d, J C, F = 21.4 HZ), 133.6, 129.9 (d, J C, F = 7.9 HZ), 128.6, 128.5, 128.5, 127.9, 127.7, 127.1, 123.9 (d, J C, F = 37.1 HZ), 115.5 (d, J C, F = 20.8 HZ), 111.8 (d, J C, F = 16.7 HZ), 94.6 (d, J C, F = 3.0 HZ), 79.3, 53.8, 51.1. HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C22H18FN [M]+ 315.1423, found 315.1422. N-benzyl-3-(3-fluorophenyl)-1-phenylprop-2-yn-1-amine (3aj). yellow oil; 98.2 mg; 78% yield. 1H
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.58 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.40–7.29 (m, 7H), 7.27–7.21 (m, 3H), 7.17
(d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.03–6.95 (m, 1H), 4.78 (s, 1H), 4.05–3.86 (m, 2H), 1.79 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 163.7, 161.2, 140.0 (d, J
C, F
= 35.5 HZ), 130.0 (d, J
C, F
= 8.5 HZ), 128.7,
128.6, 128.5, 128.0, 127.8, 127.7, 127.2, 125.1 (d, J C, F = 9.5 HZ), 118.7 (d, J C, F = 22.6 HZ), 115.6 (d, J C, F = 21.0 HZ), 90.5, 84.6 (d, J C, F = 3.3 HZ), 53.7, 51.3. HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C22H18FN [M]+ 315.1423, found 315.1421. N-benzyl-3-(4-fluorophenyl)-1-phenylprop-2-yn-1-amine (3ak). yellow oil; 89.5 mg; 71% yield. 1H
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.59 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.46–7.43 (m, 2H), 7.40–7.23 (m, 8H), 6.99
(t, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 4.78 (s, 1H), 4.04–3.86 (m, 2H), 1.86 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 163.7, 161.3, 140.1 (d, J
C, F
= 50.3 HZ), 133.6 (d, J
C, F
= 8.2 HZ), 128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 127.8,
127.7, 127.2, 119.3 (d, J C, F = 3.5 HZ), 115.6 (d, J C, F = 21.9 HZ), 89.0, 84.7, 53.7, 51.2. HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C22H18FN [M]+ 315.1423, found 315.1420. N-benzyl-1-phenyl-3-(2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)prop-2-yn-1-amine (3al). yellow oil; 74.5 mg; 51% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.66 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.64–7.59 (m, 3H), 7.48 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.43–7.25 (m, 9H), 4.84 (s, 1H), 4.11–3.96 (m, 2H), 1.79 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 140.0, 139.9, 134.3, 131.4, 128.5, 128.5, 128.0, 127.9, 127.7, 127.1, 126.5, 125.9 (q, J C, F = 15.1 HZ), 125.1, 122.4, 121.5 (dd, J C, F = 6.0 HZ), 95.4, 81.8, 53.8, 51.1. HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C23H18F3N [M]+ 365.1391, found 365.1390. N-benzyl-1-phenyl-3-(3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)prop-2-yn-1-amine (3am). yellow oil; 122.1 mg; 84% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.73 (s, 1H), 7.63–7.58 (m, 3H), 7.53 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.42–7.34 (m, 6H), 7.33–7.29 (m, 2H), 7.28–7.23 (m, 1H), 4.80 (s, 1H), 4.05–3.92 (m, 2H), 1.82 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 140.1, 139.8, 135.0, 131.0 (d, J C, F = 32.4 HZ), 128.9, 128.7, 128.6, 128.5, 128.0, 127.7, 127.3, 125.2, 124.8 (q, J C, F =10.9 HZ), 124.2, 122.5, 91.2, 84.3, 53.7, 51.3. HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C23H18F3N [M]+ 365.1391, found 365.1393. 12
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 13 of 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
The Journal of Organic Chemistry
N-benzyl-1-phenyl-3-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)prop-2-yn-1-amine (3an). colorless oil; 98.1 mg; 67% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.63–7.53 (m, 6H), 7.41–7.31 (m, 7H), 7.30–7.24 (m, 1H), 4.81 (s, 1H), 4.08–3.88 (m, 2H), 1.81 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 140.0, 139.7, 132.1, 130.2 (d, J
C, F
= 32.8 HZ), 128.7, 128.6, 128.5, 128.0, 127.7, 127.3, 127.0, 125.4-
125.2 (m), 122.7, 92.0, 84.5, 53.7, 51.3. HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C23H18F3N [M]+ 365.1391, found 365.1391. N-(1,3-diphenylprop-2-yn-1-yl)butan-1-amine (4a)19. yellow oil; 38.2 mg; 48% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.59 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.48–7.45 (m, 2H), 7.37 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.34– 7.28 (m, 4H), 4.80 (s, 1H), 2.93–2.79 (m, 1H), 2.79–2.64 (m, 1H), 1.61 (s, 1H), 1.57–1.46 (m, 2H), 1.41–1.35 (m, 2H), 0.92 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 140.7, 131.7, 128.5, 128.2, 128.1, 127.7, 127.6, 123.3, 89.7, 85.3, 54.8, 47.0, 32.1, 20.5, 14.0. N-(3, 4-dimethoxybenzyl)-1, 3-diphenylprop-2-yn-1-amine (4b). yellow oil; 53.6 mg; 50% yield. 1H
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.70–7.61 (m, 2H), 7.54 (d, J = 3.4 Hz, 2H), 7.46–7.31 (m, 6H),
6.96–7.01 (m, 2H), 6.85–6.88 (m, 1H), 4.83 (d, J = 3.4 Hz, 1H), 3.98 (s, 2H), 3.90–3.94 (m, 6H), 1.78 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 149.1, 148.3, 140.5, 132.5, 131.7, 128.5, 128.3, 128.2, 127.7, 127.6, 123.2, 120.6, 111.8, 111.3, 89.3, 85.7, 56.0, 55.9, 53.6, 51.0. HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C24H23NO2 [M]+ 357.1729, found 357.1728. N-(3-methoxyphenethyl)-1, 3-diphenylprop-2-yn-1-amine (4c). yellow oil; 50.1 mg; 49% yield. 1H
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.55 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.49–7.42 (m, 2H), 7.36 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H),
7.31–7.27 (m, 4H), 7.20 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.79–6.67 (m, 2H), 4.83 (s, 1H), 3.76 (s, 3H), 3.16–3.09 (m, 1H), 3.04–2.98 (m, 1H), 2.90–2.77 (m, 2H), 1.58 (s, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.7, 141.5, 140.4, 131.7, 129.4, 128.5, 128.3, 128.1, 127.7, 127.6, 123.1, 121.2, 114.4, 111.6, 89.3, 85.4, 55.1, 54.6, 48.2, 36.3. HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C24H23NO [M]+ 341.1780, found 341.1778. 1-(1, 3-diphenylprop-2-yn-1-yl)pyrrolidine (4d)17. yellow oil; 23.0 mg; 30% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.61 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.48 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 2H), 7.38–7.31 (m, 6H), 4.88 (s, 1H), 2.69 (s, 4H), 1.80 (s, 4H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 139.2, 131.8, 128.4, 128.3, 128.1, 128.0, 127.7, 123.2, 87.0, 86.8, 59.1, 50.2, 23.5. 4-(1, 3-diphenylprop-2-yn-1-yl)morpholine (4e)17. yellow oil; 32.3 mg; 39% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.63 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.54–7.48 (m, 2H), 7.39–7.29 (m, 6H), 4.79 (s, 1H), 3.79– 13
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
The Journal of Organic Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Page 14 of 19
3.66 (m, 4H), 2.63 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 4H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 137.9, 131.8, 128.6, 128.3, 128.3, 128.2, 127.8, 123.0, 88.5, 85.1, 67.2, 62.1, 49.9. N-(1-(4-fluorophenyl)-3-phenylprop-2-yn-1-yl)butan-1-amine (4f)19. yellow oil; 35.2 mg; 41% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.62–7.52 (m, 2H), 7.47–7.45 (m, 2H), 7.41–7.27 (m, 4H), 7.05 (t, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 4.79 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 2.90–2.78 (m, 1H), 2.76–2.65 (m, 1H), 1.58–1.45 (m, 3H), 1.38 (t, J = 11.1 Hz, 2H), 0.92 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 162.3 (d, J C, F = 244.3 HZ), 136.5 (d, J C, F = 3.0 HZ), 131.7, 129.2 (d, J C, F = 8.1 HZ), 128.3, 127.6, 123.1, 115.2 (d, J C, F = 21.3 HZ), 89.3, 85.5, 54.0, 47.0, 32.1, 20.5, 14.0. N-(3-phenyl-1-(o-tolyl)prop-2-yn-1-yl)butan-1-amine (4g). yellow oil; 33.3 mg; 40% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.70–7.64 (m, 1H), 7.48–7.42 (m, 2H), 7.32–7.27 (m, 3H), 7.24–7.14 (m, 3H), 4.90 (s, 1H), 2.99–2.87 (m, 1H), 2.79–2.66 (m, 1H), 2.47 (s, 3H), 1.54–1.50 (m, 3H), 1.42– 1.34 (m, 2H), 0.92 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 138.7, 136.1, 131.7, 130.7, 128.2, 128.0, 127.6, 127.2, 126.1, 123.4, 89.8, 84.9, 52.0, 47.6, 32.2, 20.6, 19.0, 14.0. HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C20H23N [M]+ 277.1830, found 277.1829. N-(1-phenyl-3-(3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)prop-2-yn-1-yl)butan-1-amine (4h). yellow oil; 46.2 mg; 46% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.71 (s, 1H), 7.62 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 7.44 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.39 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.32 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 4.80 (s, 1H), 2.88–2.82 (m, 1H), 2.75–2.68 (m, 1H), 1.58 (s, 1H), 1.56–1.48 (m, 2H), 1.42–1.35 (m, 2H), 0.92 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 140.3, 134.8 (d, J C, F = 0.8 HZ), C, F
= 32.5 HZ), 128.8, 128.6, 128.5, 128.5, 127.8, 127.5, 124.7 (dd, J
C, F
130.9 (d, J
= 7.1 HZ), 124.2, 91.4,
83.7, 54.7, 47.1, 32.1, 20.5, 14.0. HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C20H20F3N [M]+ 331.1548, found 331.1551. N-(3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1-phenylprop-2-yn-1-yl)butan-1-amine (4i). yellow oil; 37.8 mg, 43% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.58 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.40–7.36 (m, 3H), 7.33–7.27(m, 2H), 6.84 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.78 (s, 1H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 2.87–2.81 (m, 1H), 2.74–2.67 (m, 1H), 1.54–1.49 (m, 3H), 1.43–1.34 (m, 2H), 0.91 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.5, 140.9, 133.1, 128.5, 128.4, 128.4, 127.6, 113.9, 88.1, 85.1, 55.3, 54.8, 47.1, 32.1, 20.5, 14.0. HRMS (EI) m/z calcd for C20H23NO [M]+ 293.1780, found 293.1776.
Associated Content 14
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 15 of 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
The Journal of Organic Chemistry
Supporting Information The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: NMR spectra for compounds 3a−3e, 3g−3k, 3n, 3aa−3an, 4a-4i (PDF)
Author Information Corresponding Authors *E-mail:
[email protected].
ORCID Huangdi Feng: 0000-0002-5500-8283 Notes The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Hua Wei for assistance. This research was supported by the Innovation Research Projects of Shanghai University of Engineering Science (201810856017, cs1704006, A1-0601-19-01017), and the Opening Project of Shanghai Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology for financial support. We also acknowledge the support of the RUDN University Program 5-100.
References (1) For focused reviews on reactivity of propargylamines, see: (a) Lauder, K.; Toscani, A.; Scalacci, N.; Castagnolo, D. Synthesis and reactivity of propargylamines in organic chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 14091–14200. (b) Peshkov, V. A.; Pereshivko, O. P.; Nechaev, A. A.; Peshkov, A. A.; Van der Eycken, E. V. Reactions of secondary propargylamines with heteroallenes for the synthesis of diverse heterocycles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 3861–3898. (c) Zhang, B.; Wang, T. Gold-catalyzed transformations of propargyl alcohols and propargyl amines. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2018, 7, 1758–1783. (2) (a) Baranyi, M.; Porceddu, P. F.; Gölöncsér, F.; Kulcsár, S.; Otrokocsi, L.; Kittel, Á.; Pinna, A.; Frau, L.; Huleatt, P. B.; Khoo, M. -L.; Chai, C. L. L.; Dunkel, P.; Mátyus, P.; Morelli, M.; Sperlágh, B. Novel (hetero)arylalkenyl propargylamine compounds are protective in toxininduced models of Parkinson’s disease. Mol. Neurodegener. 2016, 11, 6. (b) Bolea, I.; Gella, 15
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
The Journal of Organic Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
A.; Unzeta, M. Propargylamine-derived multitarget-directed ligands: fighting Alzheimer’s disease with monoamine oxidase inhibitors. J. Neural. Transm. 2013, 120, 893–902. (c) Zindo, F. T.; Joubert, J.; Malan, S. F. Propargylamine as functional moiety in the design of multifunctional drugs for neurodegenerative disorders: MAO inhibition and beyond. Future Med. Chem. 2015, 7, 609–629. (3) (a) For selected reviews on A3-coupling, see: (a) Zani, L.; Bolm, C. Direct addition of alkynes to imines and related C=N electrophiles: A convenient access to propargylamines. Chem. Commun. 2006, 0, 4263–4275. (b) Peshkov, V. A.; Pereshivko, O. P.; Van der Eycken, E. A walk around the A3-coupling. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 3790–3807. (c) Seidel, D. The redoxA3 reaction. Org. Chem. Front. 2014, 1, 426–429. (d) Yoo, W. J.; Zhao, L.; Li, C.-J. The A3coupling (aldehyde-alkyne-amine) reaction: A versatile method for the preparation of propargyl amines. Aldrichim. Acta. 2011, 44, 43–51. (e) Wei, C.; Li, Z.; Li, C.-J. The development of A3-coupling (aldehyde-alkyne-amine) and AA3-coupling (asymmetric aldehyde-alkyne-amine). Synlett. 2004, 9, 1472-1483. (4) (a) Zhang, C.; Seidel, D. Nontraditional reactions of azomethine ylides: Decarboxylative threecomponent couplings of α-amino acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1798–1799. (b) Zhao, P. F.; Feng, H. D.; Pan, H. R.; Sun, Z. H.; Tong, M. C. Controlling chemoselectivity in coppercatalyzed decarboxylative A3/A3 cross-couplings: Direct formation of unsymmetrical 1,4diamino-2-butynes. Org. Chem. Front. 2017, 4, 37–41. (c) Bi, H.-P.; Teng, Q. F.; Guan, M.; Chen, W. W.; Liang, Y.-M.; Yao, X. J.; Li, C.-J. Aldehyde- and ketone-induced tandem decarboxylation-coupling (Csp3−Csp) of natural α-amino acids and alkynes. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 783–788. (d). Feng, H. D.; Jia, H. H.; Sun, Z. H. A metal-free approach toward saturated N-propargyl heterocycles via an annulation/decarboxylative coupling sequence. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2015, 357, 2447–2452. (e) Park, K.; Heo, Y.; Lee, S. Metal-free decarboxylative three-component coupling reaction for the synthesis of propargylamines. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 3322–3325. (5) (a) Zhou, L.; Shuai, Q.; Jiang, H.-F.; Li, C.-J. Copper-catalyzed amine-alkyne-alkyne addition reaction: An efficient method for the synthesis of γ, δ-alkynyl-β-amino acid derivatives. Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 11668–11674. (b) Han, J.; Xu, B.; Hammond, G. B. Highly efficient Cu(I)catalyzed synthesis of N-heterocycles through a cyclization-triggered addition of alkynes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 916–917. (c) Biyikal, M.; Porta, M.; P. W.; Blecherta, S. Zinc-
16
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 16 of 19
Page 17 of 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
The Journal of Organic Chemistry
catalyzed domino hydroamination-alkyne addition. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 1870–1875. (d) Pierce, C. J.; Yoo, H.; Larsen, C. H. A Unique route to tetrasubstituted propargylic amines by catalytic markovnikov hydroamination-alkynylation. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2013, 355, 3586– 3590. (e) Periasamy, M.; Reddy, P. O.; Satyanarayana, I.; Mohan, L.; Edukondalu, A. Diastereoselective synthesis of tetrasubstituted propargylamines via hydroamination and metalation of 1-alkynes and their enantioselective conversion to trisubstituted chiral allenes. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 987–999. (6) For reviews: see: (a) Li, C.-J. Cross-dehydrogenative coupling (CDC): Exploring C-C bond formations beyond functional group transformations. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 335–344. (b) Yeung, C. S.; Dong, V. M. Catalytic dehydrogenative cross-coupling: Forming carbon–carbon bonds by oxidizing two carbon−hydrogen bonds. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 1215–1292. (7) For selected examples, see: (a) Li, W.; Liu, J.; Ogawa, D.; Nishihara, Y.; Guo, X.; Li, Z. Ironcatalyzed oxidation of tertiary amines: Synthesis of β-1,3-dicarbonyl aldehydes by threecomponent C−C couplings. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 6272–6275. (b) Niu, M.; Yin, Z.; Fu, H.; Jiang, Y.; Zhao, Y. Copper-catalyzed coupling of tertiary aliphatic amines with terminal alkynes to propargylamines via C−H activation. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 3961–3963. (c) Rao Volla, C. M.; Vogel, P. Chemoselective C−H bond activation: Ligand and solvent free iron-catalyzed oxidative C−C cross-coupling of tertiary amines with terminal alkynes: Reaction scope and mechanism. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1701−1704. (d) Li, Z.; Yu, R.; Li, H. Iron-catalyzed C−C bond formation by direct functionalization of C−H bonds adjacent to heteroatoms. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7497−7500. (8) For alternative reviews, see: (a) Arshadi, S.; Vessally, E.; Sobati, M.; Hosseinian, A.; Bekhradnia, A. Chemical fixation of CO2 to N-propargylamines: A straightforward route to 2oxazolidinones. J. CO2 Util. 2017, 19, 120–129. (b) Zhang, Z.; Ye, J.-H.; Wu, D.-S.; Zhou, Y.Q.; Yu, D.-G. Synthesis of oxazolidin-2-ones from unsaturated amines with CO2 via homogeneous catalysis. Chem. Asian J. 2018, 13, 2292−2306. (9) (a) Golime, G.; Bogonda, G.; Kim, H. Y.; Oh, K. Biomimetic oxidative deamination catalysis via ortho-naphthoquinone-catalyzed aerobic oxidation strategy. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 4986– 4990. (b) Girish, Y. R.; Biswas, R.; De, M. Mixed-phase 2D-MoS2 as an effective photocatalyst for selective aerobic oxidative coupling of amines under visible-light irradiation. Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 13871–13878. (c) Wang, J. Q.; Lu, S. L.; Cao, X. Q.; Gu, H. W. Common metal
17
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
The Journal of Organic Chemistry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
of copper(0) as an efficient catalyst for preparation of nitriles and imines by controlling additives. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 5637−5640. (d) Rodríguez-Lugo, R. E.; Chacón-Terán, M. A.; De León, S.; Vogt, M.; Rosenthald, A. J.; Landaeta, V. R. Synthesis, characterization and Pd (ii)-coordination chemistry of the ligand tris (quinolin-8-yl) phosphite: Application in the catalytic aerobic oxidation of amines. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 2061–2072. (e) Brišar, R.; Unglaube, F.; Hollmann, D.; Jiao, H. J.; Mejía, E. Aerobic oxidative homo- and cross-coupling of amines catalyzed by phenazine radical cations. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 13481–13490. (10) (a) Al-Hmoud, L.; Jones, C. W. Reaction pathways over copper and cerium oxide catalysts for direct synthesis of imines from amines under aerobic conditions. J. Catal. 2013, 301, 116–124. (b) Murray, A. T.; King, R.; Donnelly, J. V. G.; Dowley, M. J. H.; Tuna, F.; Sells, D.; John, M. P.; Carbery, D. R. Symbiotic transition-metal and organocatalysis for catalytic ambient amine oxidation and alkene reduction reactions. ChemCatChem. 2016, 8, 510–514. (11) (a) Zhang, Y. Z.; Huang, L. L.; Li, X. Y.; Wang, L.; Feng, H. D. Chemo- and diastereoselective synthesis of N-propargyl oxazolidines through a copper-catalyzed domino A3 reaction. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 5046-5055. (b) Feng, H. D.; Ermolat'ev, D. S.; Song, G. H.; Van der Eycken, E. Regioselective Cu(I)-catalyzed tandem A3-coupling/decarboxylative coupling to 3-amino1,4-enynes. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 1942–1945. (c) Feng, H. D.; Ermolat'ev, D. S.; Song, G. H.; Van der Eycken, E. Synthesis of symmetric 1,4-diamino-2-butynes via a Cu(I)-catalyzed onepot A3-coupling/decarboxylative coupling of a propiolic acid, an aldehyde, and an amine. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 5149−5154. (12) (a) Yamaguchi, K.; Mizuno, N. Efficient heterogeneous aerobic oxidation of amines by a supported ruthenium catalyst. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1480–1483. (b) Kim, J.; Stahl, S. S. Cu/Nitroxyl-catalyzed aerobic oxidation of primary amines into nitriles at room temperature. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 1652–1656. (13) (a) Sienmsen, P.; Livingston, R. C.; Diederich, F. Acetylenic coupling: A powerful tool in molecular construction. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2632–2657. (b) Su, L.; Dong, J.; Liu, L.; Sun, M.; Qiu, R.; Zhou, Y.; Yin, S.-F. Copper catalysis for selective heterocoupling of terminal alkynes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 12348– 12351. (c) Dai, H. M.; Li, C. X.; Yu, C.; Wang, Z. H.; Yan, H.; Lu, C. S. Copper(II) catalyzed domino synthesis of quinoline derivatives from arylamines and alkynes. Org. Chem. Front. 2017, 4, 2008–2011. (14) (a) Hu, Z. Z.; Kerton, F. M. Simple copper/TEMPO catalyzed aerobic dehydrogenation of
18
ACS Paragon Plus Environment
Page 18 of 19
Page 19 of 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
The Journal of Organic Chemistry
benzylic amines and anilines. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 1618−1624. (b) Patil, R. D.; Adimurthy, S. Copper(0)-catalyzed aerobic oxidative synthesis of imines from amines under solvent-free conditions. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 5119–5122. (15) (a) Li, Z.; Bohle, D. S.; Li, C.-J. Cu-catalyzed cross-dehydrogenative coupling: A versatile strategy for C-C bond formations via the oxidative activation of sp3 C−H bonds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103, 8928–8933. (b) Alonso, F.; Arroyo, A.; Martín-García, I.; Moglie, Y. Cross-dehydrogenative coupling of tertiary amines and terminal alkynes catalyzed by copper nanoparticles on zeolite. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2015, 357, 3549–3561. (16) Samai, S.; Nandi, G. C.; Singh, M. S. An efficient and facile one-pot synthesis of propargylamines by three-component coupling of aldehydes, amines, and alkynes via C-H activation catalyzed by NiCl2. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 5555–5558. (17) Lim, J.; Park, K.; Byeun, A.; Lee, S. Copper-catalyzed decarboxylative coupling reactions for the synthesis of propargyl amines. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014, 55, 4875–4878. (18) Tong, S.; Wang, Q.; Wang, M-X.; Zhu J. P. Tuning the Reactivity of Isocyano Group: Synthesis of Imidazoles and Imidazoliums from Propargylamines and Isonitriles in the Presence of Multiple Catalysts. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 1293-1297. (19) Wang, H.; Ying, J.; Lai, M.; Qi, X. X.; Peng, J-B.; Wu, X-F. Base-Promoted Carbonylative Cyclization of Propargylic Amines with Selenium under CO Gas-free Conditions. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018, 360, 1693-1703.
19
ACS Paragon Plus Environment