the activated-sludge method of sewage purification ... - ACS Publications

THE ACTIVATED-SLUDGE METHOD OF SEWAGE PURIFICATION: AERATION OF SEWAGE IN THE PRESENCE OF ACTIVATED SLUDGE. E. J. Fort. Ind. Eng...
1 downloads 0 Views 517KB Size
July, 1916

T H E J O U R N A L OF I N D U S T R I A L A N D ENGINEERIYG CHEMISTRY

process in winter have therefore shown that about 90 per cent of suspended matter and bacteria were removed, t h a t t h e sludge can be dried by pressing from 98 to 75 per cent moisture, thereby converting the sludge into a small volume which can be easily handled, and t h a t t h e sludge has sufficient value t o ensure a constant market. MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN

AERATION OF SEWAGE IN THE P ~ S E N C EOF ACTIVATED SLUDGE BY

E. 5 . FORT

Chief Engineer of Sewers, Borough of Brooklyn

The engineering profession for a number of years has been looking for a method of sewage treatment based on biological and biochemical principles and employing air dnder pressure applied directly t o the sewage. The advantages t h a t such a method promises of very intensive treatment with relatively small expense for land and elimination of extensive filter beds and the entire septic cycle, thus doing away with the offensive odors t h a t evolve from the putrefaction of sewage and sludge, have rendered it a very attractive subject for investigation and experiment. Until recently the results of many investigations and studies have been little more than suggestive of unrealized possibilities. The experiments of Black and Phelps a t the Brooklyn Sewage Disposal Plant in 1910 were about the first t h a t indicated t h e possibility that there had been discovered a method of treatment with compressed air, which might on further study and development prove to be the one sought so long. These experimenters found it possible to reduce the demand of sewage for oxygen 33 to j o per cent in a retention period of about three hours by using about two volumes of air per volume of sewage. As the scale on which these experiments were made was small and the apparatus was rather crude a more thorough investigation obviously was necessary before their results and the principles could be utilized in designing and operating full-sized plants. In I 912, sewage-treatment experiments were authorized by the City of Kew York on a rather liberal scale, and several units were proiided in t h e design of the experimental plant to carry on studies of sewage aeration. A 16,000-gal. tank arranged for aeration experiments and named the tank aerator, the design of which met the approval of Professor Phelps, was put in service in the fall of 1913 as a continuously flowing sewage aerator. This tank was so connected to the system t h a t it could be operated either by the continuous flow or by the fill-and-draw method and could be supplied either with crude sewage or with the effluent from Imhoff tanks. Sewage was introduced a t the top and withdrawn from the bottom, though this method of operation could easily be reversed by a slight change of pipe. The crude sewage was supplied by gravity from the sewage supply, or quieting tank, t h a t served the entire experimental work of the station. It was pumped from the sewer by a reciprocating pump and was detained less than five minutes in the quieting tank. Compressed air was supplied by a duplex air compressor of ample size, installed as part of the experimental plant. The tank was 12 ft. in diameter and z j f t . 8 in. in depth. A grid for supplying compressed air, which was placed a t the bottom of the tank, was supported by 7 I , / 2 in. of broken stone which passed a 2-in. b u t was retained by a 1-in. ring. An equal depth of broken stone of the same size was placed over the grid, so t h a t the air first passed upward through the voids in the broken stone. The outlet of the tank, as originally installed for sewage-aeration experiments, was about one foot above the surface of the broken stone, so t h a t one-twentieth to one-twelfth of the contents of the tank was retained a t each emptying. A lower outlet was provided for draining the lowest level of the tank. The compressed-air grid consisted of two 11/2-in. pipes crossed a t right angles in the center. The arms of the cross

643

were connected with quarter circles pipe to form five concentric rings, each of which was perforated a t 6-in. intervals with 1/16-in. holes. The air, entering through 11/%-in.pipes, was thus distribuied t o the rings and discharged into the broken stone surrounding the grid. . Nine deflector discs, supported by a vertical 4-in. pipe in the center of the tank, formed a feature of the tank. The discs were in form not unlike wheels; the supporting pipe passed through their hubs. The surface of each disc was horizontal, and occupied the entire cross-section of the tank, which was thus divided into story-like compartments. They were designed t o deflect the downward flow of sewage in order t o prevent downward streaming and t o equalize and give a sinuous motion t o the upward flow of air; thus more even distribution of both air and sewage were secured. As stated above they were each made in the form of a wheel, supported on six arms, between which were slats, radiated from the iron hub of each disc. The slats were set in grooves in the arms with a dip of 45 '. The slats in alternate discs were set sloping from and toward the center. The first experiments, in 1913, on the continuous-flow plan with plain aeration of sewage in the tank aerator, were made with a n air supply of 0.7 j volume per volume of sewage and 2-hr. retention period. This i t was considered would be the minimum treatment. I t was insufficient to produce any marked result. The retention period was, therefore, doubled, but with little improvement. A greater volume of air was then applied b u t the result was not satisfactory, and the results secured were not even promising during the winter and early spring of 1914. As it was thought t h a t the tank would work better after it had been thoroughly - . seeded with aerobic bacteria, the continuousflow method was suspended, and the sewage was retained in the tank under aeration fot 24-hr. periods, the fill-and-draw method of operation being followed. Some phenomena of activated sludge were observed at this stage of the experiment, but the principle was not then recognized as being important. This method of ripening was carried on until June 14, when apparently the tank had ripened, and a fine clear effluent could be obtained with certainty from crude sewage or Imhoff tank effluent on the fill-and-draw plan with 24 hrs. aeration. Return was then made t o the continuous-flow method, and operation was commenced with 3.25 volumes of air per volume of sewage with j-hr. tank retention. This did not produce an effluent of satisfactory stability. The retention period was increased t o 24 hrs., with the same rate of air flow per minute, the air supply being thus increased t o 18 volumes per volume of sewage. The effluent after passing a settling tank with 3-hr. retention then showed a quality comparable with that from a sprinkling filter. Its average relative stability was 84 per cent. The quantity of air was later reduced one-half, or to 9 volumes per volume of sewage treated, the continuous-flow plan being retained. IJnder these conditions the relative stability of the settled effluent fell to j 9 per cent. This work was continued until it seemed t o be demonstrated completely that though a fairly satisfactory effluent could be obtained the cost of air made the treatment considerably more expensive than treatment by the sprinkling filter. Table I shows the average of results of operating the tank aerator to October I , 1914, on the continuous-flow plan without the employment of activated sludge. Of course, some activated sludge may have been present, but if so it was not recognized as such, and we had then no knowledge of t h a t method, which was not announced until this series of experiments was about completed. As experiments in sewage aeration with activated sludge characterized our work during 191j, the aerator tank was rearranged in March for use as an activated-sludge tank. The accumulation of activated sludge, which had been commenced about the middle of March, was sufficient t o permit regular

644

T H E J O L T R N A L O F I K D C S T R I A L d S D E-VGI,VEERIlYG C H E M I S T R Y

T‘ol. 8. NO.7

by blowing it very rapidly a t the beginning and less rapidly as the treatment proceeds. “-A drop in efficiency is noticeable during August in all points under obserw.tion. This is very possibly due to accumulations of sludge in the bottom of the t a ~ which k are not lifted by the air and consequently interfere with nitrification. The presence of the defkctors makes direct observation of this point impossilsle TABLE I-IIESVLTS OF OPSR.ITISG TASKAERATORO N COXTIXJOLWFI,OW without interruption of the experiment, but indirect cvidence r’LAN WITHOUT ACTIVATED SLUDGE supports this theory. [Parts per LIillion Except a s Otherwise Designated] Period of retention in tank aerator, 24 hours. Amount of crude seii.age “The phenomena attending the sedimentation of well-activated treated in 24 houri, 16,000 gallons. Air applied, 2.3 cu. Et. per gallon. sludge are very interesting. When the quantity is considerable Settlernrnt period of effluent in settling tank h-o. I , 3 hrs. 12 min. (about 20 per cent a t complete subsidence) the behavior in a Crude Tank Settling settling cylinder i s much the same as that of the precipitate resewage aerator Tank KO. 1 sulting from the addition of manganous sulfate and alkaline Settling matter (cc. per liter), . 2.3 5.4 0.2 Total suspended solids . . . . . . . i 6 1 103 40 iodide to water in the determination of dissolved oxygen. The \-olatile suspended solids . , . 130 79 30 material subsides as if it were a mass of loose cotton undergoing Total oxygen consumed.. . . . . . 5 8 39 26 compression, with a sharp line of demarcation between the sus. 37 27 22 Dissolved oxygen consumed. pensa and the supernatant, and not like an aggregation of free Total dissolred oxygen.. . . . . . . . . 1.4 3.1 1.1 Dissolved oxygen demand . . . . . . 191 55 31 falling particles with xidely varying rates of subsidence, giving Relative stability (percentage) , , , . , . . ... ... rise to a shading off into clear supernatant. The initial rate of Undiluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 43 a4 settling in a test recently made was a trifle over an inch per minute, Diluted I : 10 with distd. water. 35 94 100 which rate rapidly dimiuished as the process of compacting w n t tinued I I , 2 hrs., when refilling began and the air was turned on. forward, ’ ’ Refilling continued for I ~ ) ’ hrs., ? and aeration was continued for Experiments were also successfully made with a continuousa period of 20 hrs., when the cycle began again. The air mas flow activated-sludge aerator tank, but these have not yet been measured by a ‘I’enturi meter devised for the purpose. Both fully completed, and Eurther work will he done this sumincr. influent and effluent sewage were measured. The results in I n economy of operation the results so far obtained are fully averages for June, July and August, 1915, are shown in Table 11. equal to those obtained by the fill-and-draw method. One of T A B LII--RESULTS ~ O F S E W A G E A E R A T I O N I N PRESEKCE O F .kCTIVATED the main drawbacks of the process seems t o be its unreliability SLCDGE o s FILL-AND-DRAW PLAN or the tendency toward deterioration of the effluent as treatment [Parts per Million] continues unless const,ant vigilance is exercised. Crude HOCRSl F T B R REFILL DETERMINATION MOKTH sewage 0 2 5 20 The problems met in the operation of a full-sized sewage180 24 Suspended solids.. . . . . . . June 35 20 14 4 147 12 21 8 July treatment plant are not identical n-ith those in an experimental 154 12 August 24 a 6 laboratory. The vast mass of seimge to be treated cannot be Dissolved oxygen.. . . . . . . June 1,? 0.0 0.1 0.4 2.5 Tulv 0.1 0 . 0 0.2 0.0 1.7 handled in a full-sized plant with the exactness and facility :kugLlst 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.9 31 Relative stability.. . . . . . . June . . . . . 14 76 100 afforded in experimental work. Our main object in designing T --_ irlv 34 ..... 81 100 sewage treatment works (from an engineering standpoint) ... 28 August 63 88 Oxygen d e m a n d . . . . . . . . . June 230 53 38 7 is to provide methods of treatment that shall at all times afford 173 63 38 4 July 211 August 53 34 . . . . . 11 satisfactory effluents for discharge into local waters. An iYitrite.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J u n e . . . . . 0.08 0.11 0 . 4 9 1.50 effluent need not necessarily be clear and sparkling, nor need Tulv . . . . . 0.01 0.07 0.25 0.53 .. ~, August . . . . . 0.00 0.07 0.12 0.66 it be of a higher degree of stability than is locally required, S i t r a t e . . . . . . . . . . June . . . . . 0 . 10 0 . 6 0 1 . 2 0 I .30 0.00 0.25 1.5i 7.80 July but it must always be satixfactory and never subject to such de0.00 0.10 August 2.55 2.80 Volumes oi air per volurne oi semage 1.17 3.50 , . O O 24.55 terioration t h a t the plant provided may lor a time €ail from any I t i d be observed that a very good effluent was obtained cause against which pro\-ision can be made. The plant that n 4 l give the most certain result under all on the fill-and-draw method oi operation after j hrs.’ aeration with 7 volumes of air per volume of sewage. This may be com- local and general conditions of practical care with the ordinary pared with the work of t h e tank aerator in 1914 under the con- risk of carelessness considered must, of course, commend itscll tinuous-flow method without activated sludge, with 9 volumes t o t.he engineer responsible for the work. Explanations and cxof air and 2 1 hrs.’ retention; and also with 18 volumes of air in cuses do not produce results or absolve the designcr for taking chances with methods that have not proved entirely reliable. the same period. The following extract from our laboratory record is of interest: The attitude of the designer must necessarily differ from that of the experimentm. -kt the same time, though these considera“The rapidity with which the organisms present reduce the demand for oxygen is noteworthy, During the process of re- tions in all their force may be admitted, the attitude o l the engifiiling, the demand falls from about zoo parts per million on the neer ought not to be so conseri7ative t h a t his employer may lose average to about 60 parts per million. Part of this drop is, of the ad\-antage of any real advance. course, due to dilution with purified liquid from the previous ]’