The Quest
for Quality in the Laboratory R. Α. Nadkarni Exxon Chemical Company PARAMINS Technology Division Chemical Analytical Laboratory—Linden P. O. Box 536 Linden, ΝJ 07036
"The improvement of quality in products and the improvement of quality in ser vice—these are national priorities as never before. " — George Bush, 1990 Analytical c h e m i s t r y h a s always been used to measure the quality of manufactured products, particularly in the chemical industry. In view of the e v e r - i n c r e a s i n g e m p h a s i s on quality, analytical science has a piv otal role to play in the crusade for 0003-2700/91 /0363-675A/$02.50/0 © 1991 American Chemical Society
quality. In this REPORT, I will de scribe the modern concepts of quali ty, including the Japanese standards of quality and the teachings of major quality pioneers; methods for statis tical quality control and assurance;
REPORT and, finally, total quality manage ment practices used to run a success ful business. What is quality?
There are several ways to define "quality." Webster's Ninth New Colle giate Dictionary defines it as "the de gree of excellence or superiority in kind." Deming (1) defines it as a pre
dictable degree of uniformity and dependability, attainable at low cost and suited to the market. J u r a n (2) defines it as fitness for use and con f o r m a n c e to s p e c i f i c a t i o n s , a n d Crosby (3) calls it conformance to requirements. Ishikawa (4) says it is t h e d e v e l o p m e n t , design, a n d supply of a product and service t h a t is economical, useful, and always satisfactory to the customer. Exxon Chemical Company's quality council h a s adopted the following defini tion: "Quality is understanding the customer's expectations, agreeing on performance and value require ments, and providing products and services t h a t meet the expectations 100% of the time." Quality can thus be s u m m a r i z e d as satisfying t h e customer's needs.
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, VOL. 63, NO. 13, JULY 1, 1991 · 675 A
REPORT We need quality to stay competitive, to satisfy customer r e q u i r e ments, and to improve our products and processes. It also provides a measure of our efforts to achieve improvement of a process or product, to achieve a system in control, to understand the variability in natural systems, to reduce overall costs, and to guide efforts to increase productivity and innovation.
matic, Kaizen is often subtle, and its results are seldom immediately visible. Kaizen is everybody's business, including top managers, supervisors, and workers, and the Japanese say t h a t not a day should go by without some kind of i m p r o v e m e n t being made somewhere in the company. Table I contrasts Japanese Kaizen with Western innovation.
The Japanese quality culture
In every process, companies must define the characteristics that indicate quality so that they will know what to change and how to measure success. They must identify their most critical quality problems, and management must take the lead in solving them. They must achieve quality by understanding and improving the system, and by preventing problems, rather than by reducing defects through inspection and correction, and they must develop a statistical understanding of processes, and use statistics to solve problems. The quality movement traces its origins to a group of people inspired by a common goal but having distinctly different theories, percepts, and styles: Edward Deming, Joseph J u r a n , Philip Crosby, Bill Conway, Kaoru Ishikawa, and Genichi Taguchi. Despite their differences, each one believes (7) that every organization needs to have a commitment to quality, from top to bottom. Deming and J u r a n are the most prominent among these quality pio-
In recent years, Japanese goods have become synonymous with quality, durability, consistency, and reasonable prices. During postwar reconstruction, the Union of Japanese Science & Engineering and the Japan Management Association appreciated the link between quality and productivity. These organizations undertook the task of educating industry leaders in methods for quality improvement. "Quality circles" appeared by 1960. The success of these small groups of workers in eliminating special cases of product variability, and in improving the system through changes in tools, design, scheduling, and other factors, convinced Japanese industry of the usefulness of quality circles. Soon thousands of these groups started working throughout the country. They continue to flourish (5). The Japanese concept of "Kaizen" (6), or continuous improvement, opposes the Western philosophy of rapid technological progress. Whereas Western innovation is often dra-
Pioneers of quality
Table 1. Features of Kaizen and Western innovation9 Feature
Kaizen
Western Innovation
Effect
Long-term, long-lasting,
Short-term and dramatic
Pace Time frame
Small steps Continuous and incremental Gradual and constant All personnel Collectivism, team efforts
Big steps Intermittent and nonincremental Abrupt and volatile A few champions Rugged individualism, individual ideas and efforts Scrapping and rebuilding
Change Involvement Approach Mode Spark Needs Effort orientation Evaluation criteria Advantage
Maintenance and improvement Conventional know-how and state-of-the-art Little investment, but great efforts to maintain People Process and effort for better results Works well in slow growth economy
Technology breakthrough Large investment, but little effort to maintain Technology Results for profits Better suited for fast growth economy
"Adapted with permission from Reference 6.
676 A · ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, VOL. 63, NO. 13, JULY 1, 1991
neers. Deming defines management's five deadly diseases (1) as lack of constancy of purpose, emphasis on short-term profits, personnel performance evaluation, job hopping by management, and use of visible figures by a management that has little u n d e r s t a n d i n g of t h e m . Deming's philosophy (8) is summarized in his famous "14 Points for Management" (see box on p. 677 A.) Whereas Deming demands a revolution in the way managers think, J u r a n tries to make quality a discipline of management. Juran's quality theory (2, 9) is that quality planning is analogous to financial planning, budgeting, and cost reduction. His 10 steps for quality improvement are summarized in the box on p. 677 A. Statistical quality control Statistical quality control (SQC) is essential to improving the quality of products and processes. Walter Shewhart is considered the father of modern SQC methods. Working in the 1920s at Western Electric, he constructed the first control chart in 1924 and published a classic work on SQC in 1931 (10). Among the areas to which SQC techniques can be applied are manufacturing, purchasing, m a r k e t i n g , analytical science, and customer services. The seven basic tools of SQC are the flow chart, the cause and effect diagram, the Pareto diagram, the histogram, the correlation chart, the run chart, and the control chart (Figure 1). F l o w chart. A flow chart is a picture of the activities that take place in a process and is used to make interdependencies apparent. A flow chart should describe the process and identify each function, and it should be kept simple and current to maintain its utility. When constructing a flow chart, it is essential to determine boundaries and level of detail and to involve all appropriate people. Cause-effect diagram. Causeeffect diagrams are also called fishb o n e d i a g r a m s b e c a u s e of t h e i r shape, or Ishikawa diagrams after their inventor. The major causes of a problem generally are designated as 4 Ps—policies, procedures, people, and plant, or 4 Ms—materials, machines, m e t h o d s , a n d m a n p o w e r . From these major groups, branches are drawn listing the components of variation within each group. A cause can fall under more than one major area. To construct a cause-effect diagram, identify the effect and enter it in the box, write four major causes in boxes and connect them with lines
and arrows, and write minor causes on the chart around the major causes to which they relate. In building a cause-effect diagram, Pareto diagrams and brainstorming are useful. Cause-effect diagrams provide visual documentation of potential causes, which can be updated as learning occurs. Creating a cause-effect diagram is usually an educational process for all involved. P a r e t o d i a g r a m . Pareto diagrams, named after Count Vilfredo Pareto, an Italian economist who made extensive studies on unequal distribution of wealth, are a special form of vertical bar graph in which data classifications are arranged in descending order from left to right. Pareto diagrams are used to focus on problems in priority order. For construction, data are collected for appropriate causes or problems, a bar graph is set up with classification along the horizontal axis, and the bars are arranged from most to least frequent. Greater focus can be achieved by performing Pareto analysis on the largest bar of a previous Pareto chart. Repeating this macro -
t o - m i c r o P a r e t o a n a l y s i s several times can often identify the part of the process that requires a detailed examination. H i s t o g r a m . A h i s t o g r a m is a graph that shows the distribution of occurrences. Products are usually designed to be produced to a specified value, and a histogram depicts how the actual measurements of different units of the product vary from this desired value. The frequency of occurrence of any given measurement is represented by the height of the vertical columns on the graph. Ideally a histogram should have a normal distribution or a bell-shaped curve. Histograms are easy to plot and understand, and they concisely and effectively summarize the data. They aid in spotting outliers and problems by providing simple estimates of process d i s t r i b u t i o n , p e r c e n t w i t h i n specifications, and other information. Different people may plot the same data in different fashions, however, and histograms do not provide sophisticated numerical details. An alternative approach to a classical histogram is a stem-and-leaf
Deming's 14 points for management8
plot, in which data are grouped into contiguous subsets. Stem-and-leaf diagrams are easy to plot by hand, and the raw data are always available, whereas in a histogram they are usually lost. C o r r e l a t i o n c h a r t . Also known as a scatter diagram, a correlation chart is used to determine whether two measurements agree with each other, or whether a relationship exists between two sets of data. The xand >>-axes represent the measurement values of the two variables. A correlation can originate from a cause-effect relationship, a relationship between two causes, or a relationship between one cause and two other causes. The direction and tightness of the cluster indicate the strength of the relationship between two variables. The closer this cluster is to a straight line, the stronger the relationship between the variables. R u n chart. A run chart, or trend chart, is a graphic record of quality characteristics measured over time and is the simplest quality control tool to construct and use. The points are plotted on the graph in the order in which they become available. C o n t r o l c h a r t . Like t h e r u n chart, a control chart is used to study variation in a repetitive process. It is
1. Create constancy of purpose toward improvement of product and service, with a plan to become competitive and stay in business. 2. Adopt the philosophy that we are in a new economic age. We can no longer live with commonly accepted levels of delays, mistakes, defective materials, and defective workmanship. 3. Cease dependence on mass inspections; instead, build in the quality through statistical evidence. 4. End the practice of awarding business on the basis of price; instead, depend on measure of quality along with price.
Juran's 10 steps for quality improvement0 1. Build awareness of the need and opportunity for improvement. 2. Set goals for improvement.
6. Institute modern methods of training on the job.
3. Organize to reach the goals (establish a quality council, identify problems, select projects, appoint teams, designate facilitators).
7. Institute modern methods of supervision of production workers.
4. Provide training.
8. Drive out fear, so that everyone may work effectively for the company.
5. Carry out projects to solve problems.
5. Improve constantly and forever every activity in the company, to improve quality and productivity, and thus constantly decrease costs.
9. Break down barriers between departments, between, for example, research and design and sales and production. All must work as a team.
6. Report progress.
10. Eliminate numerical goals, posters, and slogans for the work force.
7. Give recognition.
11. Eliminate work standards that prescribe numerical quotas.
8. Communicate results.
12. Remove barriers that stand between the hourly worker and his right to pride of workmanship.
9. Keep score.
13. Institute a vigorous program of education and retraining. 14. Create a structure in top management that will push everyone to improve by changing as described by the above 13 points. "Adapted with permission from References 1 and 8.
10. Maintain momentum by making annual improvement part of the regular systems and processes of the company. "Adapted with permission from Reference 2.
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, VOL. 63, NO. 13, JULY 1, 1991 · 677 A
REPORT simply a run chart with statistically determined upper and lower control limit (UCL and LCL, respectively) lines drawn on either side of the pro cess average. A control chart is used for continu ously improving and tightening a process. When the data measuring a process reflect stable conditions, the process is considered "in control"; when the data fluctuate widely and unpredictably, the process is consid ered "out of control." Because a data point rarely falls outside the control limits in a process t h a t is in statisti cal control, such an outlier generates immediate suspicion that something has gone wrong. "Control" in this sense does not necessarily mean that the product will meet the specifica tions; it only means t h a t the process is consistent (sometimes, consistently bad). The different types of control charts are discussed in detail below.
equal to S/X, where S is the standard deviation and X is the average value. There are two causes of variance: special or assignable causes such as those resulting from, for example, differences between workers, m a chines, materials, and methods, and the common or chance causes t h a t underlie the assignable causes. When assignable causes are present, variations in data do not follow ex pected patterns and the process is said to be out of statistical control. Variance in a process can be mea sured through the accuracy, bias, and precision of the measurements. Accu racy is the extent to which the aver age of several measurements on a product agrees with the "true" value for that product. Bias is the system atic error either inherent in a meth od or caused by some artifact of the measurement system. Bias can be positive or negative, and several
kinds can coexist concurrently, so t h a t only net bias can be evaluated. Precision is the ability of an instru ment or method to reproduce its own measurement. The American Society for Testing M a t e r i a l s (ASTM) recognizes two levels of precision (13): repeatability, the random error associated with a single test operator in a given labora tory with the same apparatus under c o n s t a n t o p e r a t i n g conditions on identical test material, and reproduc ibility, the random error associated with test operators in different labo ratories using different apparatuses to analyze identical test material. Generally, reproducibility is two to three times larger than repeatability. People often equate good precision with accuracy, but this should not be done. A result can be consistent, but consistently biased or e r r o n e o u s . This is illustrated in the well-known
Quality assurance and quality control Although these two terms are used interchangeably, they entail subtle differences. Taylor (11) defines quali ty assurance (QA) as a system of ac tivities whose purpose is to provide, with a stated level of confidence, the producers and users of a product or service the assurance t h a t it meets defined standards of quality. Quality control (QC) is the overall system of activities designed to control the quality of a product or service so t h a t it meets the needs of users. Inspection can play an important role in QC. Inspection steps during sampling, calibration, and measure ment can detect defects, malfunc tions, or other problems that could jeopardize the analytical process. Variance, accuracy, bias, a n d precision. Measurement is perhaps the most important tool in the quali ty process. It is often said that you can't control what you can't measure and you can't improve what you can't control. Measurements help to verify cause-and-effect relationships, to de termine the effect of changes in an operation, and to allow a before-andafter comparison. Every process or system is beset with variation and noise, and the only way to control and reduce varia tion is by identifying its cause, estimating its extent, and inter preting its meaning (12). Variability arises because no two things are exactly alike, either in nature or in laboratory measurements. Variance is expressed as the coeffi cient of variation (CV) or relative standard deviation (RSD), which is
Flow chart
Cause-effect diagram
Effect
Causes
Histogram
Pareto diagram
*M
ffil·
Measurement
Category
Correlation chart
Run chart
Variable Β
Time Control chart UCL X LCL
Figure 1. Seven statistical quality control tools.
678 A · ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, VOL. 63, NO. 13, JULY 1, 1991
bull's eye analogy in Figure 2 (14). In medieval t i m e s everyone believed t h a t t h e sun a n d s t a r s revolved around the earth. The precision of public opinion was superb, but the accuracy was terrible. Control c h a r t s . The h e a r t of a quality control or quality assurance program is the control c h a r t . Its overwhelming advantage over n u merical d a t a is t h a t a picture is worth a thousand words. However, control charts cannot tell the cause of the upset, only that there is an upset; it is up to the operator to investigate, identify, and eliminate the cause(s) and bring the process into a state of statistical control. A control chart must be viewed as a living docu ment; any indicated problem must be fixed rather than not fixed and the chart merely filed away. For a labora tory, the only thing worse than not having one plot a control chart is to
ignore its message. A minimum of 12 and an optimum of 30 data points should be collected before plotting a control chart. Data must be plotted in the exact sequence in which they are collected, and the upper and lower control limits must be statistically calculated from these data. A control chart should be re vised only when the existing limits are no longer appropriate. When interpreting a control chart, remember that the points that fluc tuate within the control limits are a natural reflection of the inherent vari ability or noise of the process. If the process is in control, leave it alone! There are several statistical rules for identifying out-of-control results (15, 16). For example, a single point outside the control limits; a run of 8, 9, or more points in a row above or below the center line; 6 consecutive points increasing or decreasing; 14
Precise, contains bias
Not precise, contains bias
Precise, no bias
Not precise, no bias
Figure 2. Illustration of the fact that precision and accuracy are not always equivalent. (Adapted with permission from Reference 14.)
points in a row alternating up and down; 2 out of 3, or 4 out of 5 succes sive points in the area near the outer control limit; a sawtoothed pattern; or sudden shifts in data can all indi cate the need for appropriate action. There are different kinds of control charts based on the type of data be ing measured (Table II). Most com monly used in the analytical labora tory are individual, average, and range charts. The average (X) and the range (R) charts are almost al ways plotted together; X is the aver age of several observations, and R is the absolute difference between the highest and lowest values within a subgroup. In the individual (I) chart, individ ual values are plotted in the form of an average control chart for the sub group size η = 1. This control chart is widely used in the chemical industry because of the cost of testing, test turnaround time, and time interval between independent samples. The individual chart is often the practical choice because only single observa tions are available. More complex control charts in clude cumulative s u m m a t i o n (CUSUM) and exponentially weight ed moving average (EWMA) charts. A new chart that combines the ad vantages of many of the traditional charts has been in use for three years in several Exxon Chemical and Re finery laboratories worldwide. The control/performance (C/P) chart was developed by Gerald Shea of Exxon (17), and is more popularly called the "Swiss army knife" of control charts because it provides almost all the in formation that can be derived from average, range, CUSUM, and indi vidual charts with run rules as well as t h e s u m m a r y h i s t o g r a m . The chart limits are calculated from 2 0 30 data points as well as their mean value and the standard deviation by determining the average range be tween the measurements. The con trol limits are drawn as the mean ± 1σ, 2σ, or 3σ as bias, warning, and action lines, respectively. Individual points are plotted on the I chart and on the histogram, and a 20% trend line is drawn through the points, which m a k e s it equivalent to an EWMA plot. The 20% t r e n d line smooths the data to show either a constant average or a shift in the av erage. When interpreting the C/P chart, the following questions are consid ered: Is a reading beyond the action or warning line? Is the trend line be yond or approaching the bias lines? Does the histogram display the cor-
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, VOL. 63, NO. 13, JULY 1, 1991 · 679 A
REPORT rect bell shape? Figure 3 shows a typical C/P chart with data obtained for the sulfated ash test (ASTM D874) on a gasoline additive. Colored sigma zones make the changes readily visible, with col ors similar to traffic lights. The bias lines (1σ) are green; d a t a within these lines are under control. The warning lines (2σ) are yellow; data within these lines are OK, but should be watched carefully so that any outof-control tendencies will be spotted as soon as they develop. The action lines (3σ) are red; data within these lines are out of statistical control,
panies to evaluate their own quality activities as well as those of their vendors, licensees, and agents. Regu latory agencies also use quality au dits to judge the quality activities of the organizations they are assigned to regulate. For example, a number of automotive manufacturers have instituted TQM audits of petrochem ical producers to ensure consistent quality. The International Standards Or ganization (ISO) is a Geneva-based body consisting of member bodies from 90 countries, including ANSI (American National Standards Insti tute) from the United States, AFNOR (Association Française de Normalisation) from France, BSI (British Standards Institution) from the United Kingdom, and DIN (Deutsche Instit u t fur Normung) from Germany. ISO issued its standards for TQM in 1986, based on existing standards in the U n i t e d Kingdom, t h e U n i t e d States, and the F a r East. Sixteen western nations have accepted these ISO standards in toto, changing only the designation numbers. The ISO individual standards look for documented quality in all aspects of business, including purchasing,
and corrective action must be taken to bring the analyses under control. Total quality management The keystone of total quality man agement (TQM) is the concept of a customer and a supplier working to gether for mutual advantage. Audit certification by an independent body is an effective means by which an or ganization can demonstrate to its customers that it is operating under a quality system. Audits compare a c t u a l practice with some concept of good practice. Most quality audits are used by com-
Table II. Types of control charts Type of data
Subgroup size*
Chart to use
Classification Count Count Measurement Measurement Measurement
Variable Variable Constant 1 Constant (>1) Variable
Percent defective Incidences per unit Number of incidences I, C/P X, R X,R
"The subgroup is a small group of measurements, usually four or five, taken at nearly the same time.
CONTROL-PERFORMANCE CHART DFTFRMINATIOC
SULFATED ASH
PfRIOD COVFRF.D
SAMPLE
(SASH)
4/4/90
METHOD
LUBRICANT
D874 UNIT OF MEASUREMENT
x=
WT.%
1
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
—
ΞΞ =
-
18
19
20
21
23
7.08
24
25
26
σ . 27
28
29
30
31
0.114 32
33
34
35
nΞ
7.2 7.1
4
Φ, '*>
/
=
^
Zj
7.0
6.8
=
" .
RUN
-
Ξ
1 - - —
6.7
-
—
6.9
*
Ξ ΞΞ
ΞΞ 1
2
3
4
5
Β
8
10
7.09
7.20
7.23
7.02
7.16
6.95
6.85
7.01
6.80
6.90
DATE
4/4 CLG
4/4 CLG
4/4 CLG
4/4 CLG
4/4 CLG
4/6 CLG
4/6 CLG
4/6 CLG
4/6 CLG
4/6 CLG
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
7.07 4/26 CLG
7.14 4/26 CLG
7.01 5/10 CLG
7.10 5/16 CLG
6.93 5/17 CLG
7.15 5/22 CLG
RUN READING DATE INITIALS
=
— ΞΞ =
ΞΞ 7
READING
INITIALS
-·-·
7.26 5/25 CLG
7.12 6/14 NEH
7.41 6/25 NEH
28
6.95 7/25 CLG
11
12
7.12
7.15
13
7.1 7
14
7.11
4/9 CLG
4/9 CLG
4/9 CLG
4/9 CLG
29
30
31
32
6.88 8/2 CLG
7.12 R/7 CLG
7.0 ) 8/8 NEH
7.14 8/13 NEH
REMARKS:
Figure 3. Control/performance chart for the sulfated ash test (ASTM D874) on a gasoline additive. 680 A · ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, VOL. 63, NO. 13, JULY 1, 1991
36
ΪΖ
—:
'ΞΙΞ —
S
8/30/90
~
-
7.3
22
= ~
==
7.4
h
17
-
ΞΞ
= - PERFORMANCE HISTOGRAM -
6
-
ADDITIVE
15
6
17
1
7.13
7.19
7.08
7.04
4/9 CLG
4/20 NEH
4/20 NEH
4/20 NEH
33
6.98 8716 CLG
34
35
36
6.98 8/16 CLG
7.14 8/21 NEH
7.10 8/30 NEH
designing, manufacturing, analyzing, testing, shipping, storage, after-sales service, document control, personnel t r a i n i n g , u s e of s t a t i s t i c a l t e c h niques, and quality management. A properly documented system is the h e a r t of an ISO audit. ISO stresses taking timely and effective corrective action, so that nonconforming products are not shipped to customers. Commitment, active support, and involvement at all levels of management and staff are required for ISO accreditation. Several teams must generally work for several years to plan, identify, and allocate resources for improving key areas before an organization feels confident that it can pass an ISO audit. ISO-authorized auditors (e.g., BSI in Europe or U n d e r w r i t e r s Laboratories in t h e United States) audit the plant intensively to verify t h a t actual practice is consistent with documented standards. Obtaining ISO accreditation is not an end in itself, but only the beginning of a quality spiral with continuous improvement. Accreditation may be withdrawn if the system is found substandard in subsequent audits. The quality system is maintained by
regular internal audits and reviews, plus up to four unannounced external audits per year. ISO 9000 Series standards do not restrict change or innovation; rather, they ensure t h a t change is controlled and properly documented. The manpower involved in these efforts is significant. TQM activities r e q u i r e f u l l - t i m e a t t e n t i o n from some personnel, and all personnel must devote some time to meeting the documented protocol. The advantages of ISO certification, however, outweigh the efforts required to achieve it. It provides tangible evidence to customers and suppliers of an organization's commitment to quality. It also encourages customers to reduce their own materials testing, and it provides leverage on suppliers to improve their quality standards. The disciplines of ISO are designed to eliminate the likelihood of expensive errors and to provide the means for prompt and effective corrective action. Economic benefits accrue from better use of raw materials, reduced inspection costs, continuous improvement, and elimination of waste. Quality is free once you have invested in doing it
Nadkarni's 10 standards for total quality management 1. Commitment. Believe in the new philosophy of quality and show constancy of purpose because it's the right thing to do; it is here to stay for the foreseeable future. 2. Leadership. Show quality behavior by example. Leadership is for everyone, not just managers.
Electrochemistry and Biochemistry —a Growing Relationship Although biochemists have long appreciated the value of electrochemical techniques, at EG&G Princeton Applied Research, we're taking the relationship to its next level. With our Model 273 potentiostat, you can now investigate biochemical systems using microelectrodes at low current levels or at high scan rates!
SmV/sec 10 P m GCE electrode Model 270 4 mM Norepinephrine
Using our Model 270 software, you can measure currents at 8 picoamps—or lower! And there's no need for extra hardware—our software takes the superb technical specifications of the Model 273 to their limits and beyond. 1000 V/sec ! 0 um GCE etoctrodo Model 273 « irM Norei).
3. Customer orientation. Be nice to your customers; they are the reason you are here. Determine their needs and educate them to help them better understand their needs. 4. Teamwork. We are all in this together—subgroups, departments, suppliers, customers, chemists, engineers, service staff, and research staff. Build on each other's ideas and strengths. 5. Communication. Appreciate other viewpoints. Communication is vital to all business, whether global or close to home. 6. Empowerment. As a boss, take the blame and pass on the credit. Give people power, responsibility, pride of workmanship, and recognition. 7. Statistical quality assurance. Employ statistical tools to identify causes and resolve problems. Quality assurance is an integral part of manufacturing and laboratory operations, not an added chore. 8. Training. Use continuing education for continuous improvement. Refresh what you know with further training.
POTENTIAL (VS. Ao/AgCl)
Are you studying kinetics? The Model 273 has the analog specifications to let you run at scan rates of u p to 10,000 volts per second! Electrochemistry and biochemistry. Through our applications research and technical support, we're dedicated to making this relationship grow. For more information call us at 609-530-1000.
9. Style. Believe in your own quality philosophy. Learn from quality pioneers, taking the best from each to suit your circumstances. 10. Pride of workmanship. Enjoy your work. However bleak things may look, you can hold your head high knowing that you did the job your way, that you did it the right way, and that you did it the quality way.
EG&G
PARC
P.O. BOX 2565 · PRLNCETON, NJ 08543-2565 (609) 530-1000 · TELEX: 843409 «FAX: (609) 883-7259
Circle 32 for literature.
Circle 33 for Sales Ren.
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, VOL. 63, NO. 13, JULY 1,1991 · 681 A
REPORT right the first time (3). Although 16,000 European businesses have been ISO accredited, only 30 or so have been accredited in the United States. In view of the increasing unification of E u r o p e a n economies, ISO 9000 accreditation will be an important requirement for doing business in the post-1992 European Economic Community. Some are even calling it a nonbenign trade b a r r i e r in post-'92 Europe. N o r t h American industries that ignore the ISO 9000 movement do so at peril of their future business in Europe. T h e r e is no d e n y i n g t h a t t o t a l quality management can be a tough pill to swallow. But if American industries and businesses are to survive and prosper, this is a medicine they have to take. The essential ingredients of TQM are shown in the box on p. 681 A. To compete in the global village of today and tomorrow, there is no alternative to quality. Total quality management is here to stay for the foreseeable future! To quote Edward Deming (i), "Charles Darwin's law of survival of the fittest . . . holds in the free enterprise as well as in the natural selection. It is a cruel law, unrelenting. Actually,
JAIMA
sion Data for ASTM Methods of Petroleum Products and Lubricants; (RR-D-2-1007, Annual Book of ASTM Standards); ASTM: Philadelphia, PA, 1989: Vol. 5.03. (14) ASTM Standardization News, January 1985, 45. References (15) Nelson, L. S. /. Qual. Technol. 1984, (1) Deming, W. E. Out of the Crisis; MIT 16(4), 100. Press: Cambridge, MA, 1989. (16) Nelson, L. S. / Qual. Technol. 1985, (2) Juran, J. M. Quality Control Handbook; 17(2), 114. McGraw Hill Co.: New York, 1974. (17) Shea, G. Presented at the American (3) Crosby, P. B. Quality Is Free; New Society for Quality Control Annual American Library: New York, 1979. Meeting, Oct. 1987, Atlantic City, NJ. (4) Ishikawa, K. Quality Progress, September 1989, 70. (5) Kregoski, R.; Scott, B. Quality Circles; Dartnell Press: Chicago, IL, 1982. (6) Imai, M. Kaizen; Random House: New York, 1986. (7) Wood, R. C. Quality Review, Winter 1988 18 (8) Sch'erkenbach, W. W. The Deming Route to Quality and Productivity; Leep Press Books: Washington, DC, 1988. (9) Juran, J. M. Quality Progress, August 1986, 19. (10) Shewhart, W. A. Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Products; Van Nostrand: New York, 1931. R.A. Nadkarni received his Ph.D. from (11) Taylor, J. K. Quality Assurance of the University of Bombay. Prior to joining Chemical Measurements; Lewis Publish- Exxon, he was a research associate at the ers: Chelsea, MI, 1988. University of Kentucky and a research (12) Nelson, L. S. Presented at the MIT Conference on Managing Systems of manager of the Materials Science Center People and Machines for Improved Qualanalytical facility at Cornell University. ity and Productivity, 1983, Cambridge, He currently coordinates the analytical MA. QC activity and long-range analytical di(13) American Society for Testing and Materials. Manual on Determining Preci- rections of 20 laboratories worldwide. the problem will solve itself. The only survivors will be companies with constancy of purpose for quality, productivity, and service."
SHOW'91
SHOW
JAPAH«lABW*1
wrmmm
Hours: 10:00a.m.~5:00p.m. Venue: Makuhari Messe[Nippon Convention Center] 1, Nakase 2-chome, Chiba, Japan. Phone:0472-96-0001(Representative) Admission: Free Exhibits: Analytical instruments for research laboratories, process control, pollution monitoring, occupational safety and medical applications. Exhibit Space: 654 booths. Supported by: Ministry of International Trade and Industry Agency of Industrial Science and Technology(MITI) The Chemical Society of Japan. The Japan Society of Analytical Chemistry.
Sponsored by Japan Analytical Instruments Manufacturers Association Taimei Bldg., 3-22 Kanda-Ogawamachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan 101 Phone:(03)3292-0642 Fax:(03)3292-7157 CIRCLE 72 ON READER SERVICE CARD
682 A · ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, VOL 63, NO. 13, JULY 1, 1991
