The Roles of Fluid Properties, Half-Cycle Slug Size, and

Adidharma, Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Wyoming ... The best timing to inject miscible CO2 WAG is when the ...
4 downloads 11 Views 129KB Size
The Roles of Fluid Properties, Half‐Cycle Slug Size, and Timing of Cyclic Injection on Water  Alternating Gas Injection Performance in Near‐Miscible and Miscible CO2 Flooding Hertanto Adidharma Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering University of Wyoming Laramie WY 82071 Hertanto Adidharma, Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071 The overall goal of this project is to experimentally study the effects of fluid properties, CO2 and water half‐cycle slug size (HCSS), and timing of cyclic injection on the performance of Water Alternating Gas (WAG) injection in near‐miscible and miscible conditions. The effects of timingg of cyclic y injections j on WAG p performance in miscible CO2 floodingg have been investigated. g A crude oil from South Slattery field in Wyoming is used. The core flooding experiments in Berea sandstone core are conducted at the formation temperature of South Slattery field, i.e., 57oC, and at miscible condition, i.e., at a pressure of 2960 psi (20% above the minimum miscible pressure of the oil sample). WAG injection is introduced at different stages of water flooding, i.e., when secondary water flooding recoveries (WFR) are 0%, 20%, 40%, and 55% of original oil in place (OOIP). Ten cycles are injected with an HCSS of 0.1 PV and a WAG ratio of 1:1. The results show that injecting WAG too early or too late results in either low macro sweep efficiency ff or low l micro displacement d l efficiency. ff The h best b timing to inject miscible bl CO2 WAG is when h the h water flood fl d front f roughly passes through the middle of the core, i.e., when water flooding has produced roughly half of the oil that could be recovered by secondary water flooding. By using the best timing, the oil recovery achieves an optimum value. 100%

100% Total reco overy [% OOIP]

90% Recoveryy [% OOIP]

80% 70% Stage 4, Tertiary mode

60% 50% Stage 3, WFR = 40%

40% 30%

Water flooding

Stage 2, WFR = 20%

20%

95% 90% 85% 80% 75%

10%

Stage 1, Secondary mode

0%

70% 0

1

2 3 Injected PV

4

5

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Stage at which WAG is introduced (%water flooding oil recovery)

60%